Presentation 4.1c Citizens' engagement
-
Upload
johnabutterworth -
Category
Technology
-
view
302 -
download
1
Transcript of Presentation 4.1c Citizens' engagement
Module 4 Taking Action
Session 4.1
Building accountability through citizens’ engagement
ACRA training workshop, Nov 2010
Strengthening transparency, integrity and accountability: preventing corruption in water and natural resources projects
IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre
Accountability routesSource – “Making services work for poor people” the World Development Report, World Bank, 2004
Objectives
• To introduce a range of tools
• To highlight examples– Which can be used singly
or in combination
• Key point – there are many methods known but probably as many which are not
• Set scene for discussion
Raising citizens voice
• Low feedback: low performance
• Empowers citizens to give feedback and seek improvements
• Build capacity, analyse performance, understand entitlements, dialogue with providers
Objective: structured, institutionalised dialogue & engagement of communities and providers
Tools
Citizens voice– Report cards – Community scorecards– Access mapping– Expenditure/performance
tracking & monitoring– Participatory budgeting– Public hearings– Freedom of Information
(covered later today)
Citizens’ needs
Seeking Accountability
• Community wide picture of current service levels
• Understanding of what it should be
• Who is responsible?• Then – people are in
position to ask why, seek solutions
Information needs
• Regular reports and accounts• But often not produced, or
accessible• Key indicators e.g. no. of
connections, charges, response to complaints
• Simple summaries of key information can be more widely distributed
• Using utility bills, media...
Report cards
• Public Affairs Centre (PAC), Bangalore
• Rank performance of public service agencies (including water)
• Monitored through survey research (equiv: polling):– Satisfaction with staff, – Quality of service, – Information provision,– Corruption.
• Revealed:
Low levels of public satisfaction,
Agencies not citizen friendly, lacked customer orientation,
Corruption: serious problem.
Report cards (2)
• Report cards influenced key officials in understanding perceptions of ordinary citizens
• Public agencies launched reforms to improve the infrastructure and services
• Government agencies showed greater transparency and more responsiveness
• RCs acted as a catalyst in the transformation of services in Bangalore
• Role of strong media• Extractive data capture
Community scorecards
• Community members decide on service aspects to incorporate
• Input tracking matrix developed (understanding of entitlements, budgets, constraints etc)
• Discuss and then score aspects of service • Service providers encouraged to do the
same• “Interface meeting” held (District Forum?)• Low score items addressed and action
plan produced• Directness of approach valued, rural
setting more appropriate?
Mapping Access
• Valuable, visual tool:• Rural waterpoints
Unequal distribution –
skewed funding...– Officials confronted by
inequity, corruption
• Slum enumeration & mapping– Poor on the map for the first time– Corrupt reporting, – practices identified...
Public hearings/meetings
• A normal function of government
• Provide information and solicit views
• Flow of information• Enables scrutiny• Use collective power against
vested interest• Better relationships• People’s Juries one example –
from India• Locally generated info to plug
gaps• Basis for discussion, planning
Public expenditure tracking
• Tracks flow of funds• Do public funds end up where they are
supposed to?• Compare central disbursement of funds with
local expenditure• Requires:
– high level of literacy,
– independent research capacity
• Example in Bangladesh showed subsidy capture by elite
– Entailed diversion to “connected” people
• CBOs motivated to learn to do it themselves– Process developed to participatory budgeting
12
Participatory budgeting
• A further step….giving communities specific control over some budgets
• Involve citizens in investment setting and oversight of expenditure
• In Belo Horizonte, 40% investment now spent this way– resulted in shift towards
sanitation and basic infrastructure (roads)
Thanks!
Participants’ experiences
• Participants – what are your experience(s)?
• This can be citizen or regulator led
• Experience from other sectors welcome too