PRESENTATION #3

53
PRESENTATION #3 Electric Bike Charging and Docking Station: ECE Group 7

Transcript of PRESENTATION #3

Page 1: PRESENTATION #3

PRESENTATION #3Electric Bike Charging and Docking Station: ECE Group 7

Page 2: PRESENTATION #3

Presentation Introduction

● Project Introduction

● Locking System Overview & Testing Results

● Charging System Overview & Testing Results

● Control System Overview & Testing Results

● Prototype Demonstration

● Budget Review

● Conclusions

● Questions

Page 3: PRESENTATION #3

Project IntroductionJustin Hatcher

Page 4: PRESENTATION #3

Project Sponsor

● Bicycle Capital

● Background Information

○ Developing an electric bike sharing

program for the local area and beyond

○ Focused on providing a reliable,

efficient method of transportation

○ Currently have eBike sharing programs

in South America

Justin Hatcher

Page 5: PRESENTATION #3

Problem Statement

● To create a docking station capable of automatically charging and locking the

eBike being utilized by Bicycle Capital

● Major Challenges:

○ How to charge the eBike?

○ How to secure the eBike?

○ How to minimize user interaction with the station?

Justin Hatcher

Page 6: PRESENTATION #3

Needs Analysis

● The eBike charging and docking station should:

○ Be able to efficiently charge an eBike

○ Be able to securely lock an eBike

○ Utilize a front facing docking method

○ Require minimal user interaction

○ Be able to operate in adverse weather conditions

○ Be modular by design and aesthetically pleasing

○ Be cost-effective

Justin Hatcher

Page 7: PRESENTATION #3

Areas of Focus

● Locking System

○ The locking system encompasses how the eBike will be kept secure

○ Includes the station and bracket design

● Charging System

○ The charging system encompasses how the eBike will be charged

○ Includes all electrical components required to charge the eBike

● Control System

○ The control system encompasses how a user will check out an eBike

○ Includes the RFID module that will control the locking system

Justin Hatcher

Page 8: PRESENTATION #3

Locking System Overview Elijah Goodson

Page 9: PRESENTATION #3

Final Station Design

● Height: 37 9/16 inches

● Width: 12 1/8 inches

● Depth: 21 inches

● Weight: 50 pounds

Eli Goodson

Page 10: PRESENTATION #3

Final Station Design

Eli Goodson

Page 11: PRESENTATION #3

Final Station Design

Eli Goodson

Parts List from Top to Bottom:

● Insulation Cover

● Female Charger Connection

● Charging Support

● Latch Support

● Base Plate

● Latch Solenoid

● Wheel Well

Page 12: PRESENTATION #3

Final Station Design Overview

● Initial designs were focused around a linear actuator based design

● Final design uses a latch type solenoid as the locking mechanism

● Why the latch solenoid was chosen:

○ has a fail-safe locked position if no power is supplied

○ less expensive than linear actuators

○ quicker reaction time than linear actuators

○ smaller in size than linear actuators

● The final station design is more simple and more efficient with only eight parts

Eli Goodson

Page 13: PRESENTATION #3

Final Bracket

● Height: 3 inches

● Width: 2 21/32 inches

● Depth: 6 1/8 inches

● Weight: 3.22 pounds

Eli Goodson

Page 14: PRESENTATION #3

Parts listed from top to bottom:

● Insulation Cover

● Male Charger Connection

● Charger Support

● eBike Bracket Attachment

Final Bracket

Eli Goodson

Page 15: PRESENTATION #3

Final Bracket Alterations

● Removed a stability peg to create room

for the electrical components

● Added additional space to run electrical

wires to the lithium-ion battery

● Increased the overhead clearance for the

electrical components

Eli Goodson

Page 16: PRESENTATION #3

Final Bracket Overview

● Bracket has been fabricated from a donated piece of billet aluminum

● Design keeps electrical components hidden from elements

● Design has a more streamlined shape that is aesthetically pleasing

● Electrical components are housed in 3-D printed plastic to keep them insulated

and protected from tampering and weather

Eli Goodson

Page 17: PRESENTATION #3

Final Station Design with eBike Attachment

Eli Goodson

Page 18: PRESENTATION #3

Locking System Testing ResultsHunter Harrison

Page 19: PRESENTATION #3

Station Base Testing

Simulation Testing

● Simulation testing was performed on the station base using Solidworks 2014

● Strength tests and deformation tests were simulated

● Base material used in the simulation testing: AISI 321 Annealed Stainless Steel

Hunter Harrison

Page 20: PRESENTATION #3

Types of Testing Overview

● Strength testing:

○ Applying a load to the component while grounding a specified surface and

seeing how much stress occurs and where the stress occurs

● Deformation testing:

○ Applying a load to the component and seeing how the component will

deform and where the component will deform

Hunter Harrison

Page 21: PRESENTATION #3

Station Base Strength Test Results

● The testing force applied: 2000N (450 lbf)

● The force was applied to the top of the station

● The station was grounded at the base

● Blue coloring indicates low values of stress

● Red coloring indicates higher values of stress

● The station base is sufficiently strong

Hunter Harrison

Page 22: PRESENTATION #3

Station Base Deformation Test Results

● The testing force applied: 2000N (450 lbf)

● The force was applied to the top of the station

● The station was grounded at the base

● Blue coloring indicates low values of stress

● Red coloring indicates higher values of stress

● The station base is sufficiently strong

Hunter Harrison

Page 23: PRESENTATION #3

Bracket Strength Test

● The testing force applied: 2000N (450 lbf)

● The force was applied to the top of the bracket

● The station was grounded at the base

● Blue coloring indicates low values of stress

● Red coloring indicates high values of stress

● Stress is higher around bolt holes as expected

● The bracket is sufficiently strong

Hunter Harrison

Page 24: PRESENTATION #3

Future Testing

● Full scale prototype made of AISI 321 Annealed Stainless Steel tubing should be

subjected to tests such as the ones simulated to validate simulation results

● These tests have not been performed due to the fact that our prototype

station base was created using wood to reduce cost

● The strength of the latching solenoid should also be tested to ensure it can

withstand the proper amounts of stress expected

Hunter Harrison

Page 25: PRESENTATION #3

Charging System OverviewGabriel Sejas

Page 26: PRESENTATION #3

Final Charging System Connection Device

● Final Connection Device:

EZGO Charger Plug

● The EZGO charger is commonly used to

charge golf carts

● This connector was selected because it

can handle the voltage and current

output needed

● The device has internal components that

are easy to connect and disconnect

Gabriel Sejas

Page 27: PRESENTATION #3

Female Charging Connection

Parts List from Top to Bottom:

● Insulation Cover

● Female Charger Connection

● Charging Support

● Latch Support

● Base Plate

● Latch Solenoid

● Wheel Well

Gabriel Sejas

Page 28: PRESENTATION #3

Key Charging System Components:

● Insulation Cover (red piece)

● Male Charger Connection

● Charger Support (yellow peice)

Male Charging Connection

Gabriel Sejas

Page 29: PRESENTATION #3

Charging System Testing ResultsXiaoRui Liu

Page 30: PRESENTATION #3

Charging System Testing

● Testing Goal: To ensure the lithium-ion battery charges at the same rate with

the created Charging System as it does with the standard charger

● Specific Tests:

● Voltage Output Test

● Charge Time Test

XiaoRui Liu

Page 31: PRESENTATION #3

Voltage Output Test

● Test Purpose: To ensure the output voltage coming from the created Charging

System is the same output voltage from the standard charger

● Test Results: Under the same testing conditions the output voltage of the

Charging System was equal to the output voltage of the standard lithium-ion

battery charger

Tested System Charging System Standard Charger

Expected Voltage 42.5 V 42.5 V

Measured Voltage 42.5 V 42.5 V

XiaoRui Liu

Page 32: PRESENTATION #3

Charge Time Test

● Test Purpose: To ensure the total charging time when using the Charging

System is the same as the total charging time when using the standard lithium-

ion battery charger

● Test Procedure: Under the same testing conditions, test the time it takes to

fully charge the lithium-ion battery with the Charging System and with the

standard lithium-ion battery charger; compare the results

● A full charge time test has not yet been completed

XiaoRui Liu

Page 33: PRESENTATION #3

Charging System Testing Conclusions

● The voltage output test was successful as previously shown

● When the eBike was connected to the station, the standard lithium-ion battery

charger recognized the eBike’s lithium-ion battery

● This confirmed that a solid safe connection was made between the charger and

the lithium-ion battery

● The limit to charge time will be how fast the standard charger charges the

eBike’s lithium-ion battery

XiaoRui Liu

Page 34: PRESENTATION #3

Control System Review Hassan Aftab

Page 35: PRESENTATION #3

Control System Components

● 12 Volt DC latching solenoid

● Solenoid driver circuit

● Arduino Uno microcontroller

● Arduino Protoshield

● RC522 Mifare RFID reader/writer

● RFID swipe cards and access fobs

Hassan Aftab

Page 36: PRESENTATION #3

Control Components Flow Chart

Microcontroller Solenoid Driver DC Latching Solenoid

RFID Sensor12 V DC Supply

Hassan Aftab

Page 37: PRESENTATION #3

Solenoid Driver Schematic

Hassan Aftab

Page 38: PRESENTATION #3

Microcontroller Pins Table

Hassan Aftab

Arduino Uno Input/Output Pins Function

Digital I/O 5 RFID RST - Reset control

Digital I/O 8 Output signal to solenoid driver

Digital I/O 10 RFID SDA - I2C-bus serial data line input/output

Digital I/O 11 RFID MOSI - SPI master out, slave in

Digital I/O 12 RFID MISO - SPI master in, slave out

Digital I/O 13 RFID SCK- SPI serial clock input

3.3 V RFID 3.3 V Input

GND RFID GND

Page 39: PRESENTATION #3

Input/Output Pins Schematic

Hassan Aftab

Page 40: PRESENTATION #3

Control System Test ResultsHassan Aftab

Page 41: PRESENTATION #3

Microcontroller Testing

● Testing was done to ensure the Arduino Uno was full functionality

○ Board powered on when connected to power source (USB or DC source)

○ Ran various sample code sets and validated the results

○ Checked all input and output ports to ensure full functionality

○ Reset button functioned when pressed; system was reset

Hassan Aftab

Page 42: PRESENTATION #3

RFID Module and Reader Testing

● RFID module was placed on the top right corner of the prototype station

● The RFID module is sensitive to the amount of distance in which it will read a

RFID card or fob (the closer the better)

● We found that when the card or fob is almost touching the RFID module is

when the system performs the best

● RFID module clearly detects which RFID card or fob is being used

● RFID cards and fobs are passive which can sometimes cause a delay in solenoid

retraction time; we believe switching to active tags in the future will fix this

Hassan Aftab

Page 43: PRESENTATION #3

Solenoid Testing

● Connected DC latching solenoid to a 12V 2A DC

power supply

● The solenoid latch retracted and remained

retracted as long as power was being supplied

● The test was successful:

○ The solenoid retracted quickly

○ Default position was in the locked position

Hassan Aftab

Page 44: PRESENTATION #3

Solenoid Driver Testing

● Constructed solenoid driver circuit and ran a basic blink program on the Arduino

Uno using an output pin to drive the solenoid

● The program provided a signal to the latching solenoid whenever LED1 on the

Arduino Uno microcontroller blinked

● Test successful; solenoid latch would retract whenever LED1 blinked and would

remain retracted in correspondence to the LED1 blinking frequency

● For example, if the LED1 blinking delay was set for 5 seconds, the latch would

remain compressed for 5 seconds before releasing

Hassan Aftab

Page 45: PRESENTATION #3

Full Control System Testing

● When an RFID card or fob is swiped,

the solenoid will actuate allowing a

user to remove the eBike from the

station

● The station will only unlock for the RFID

cards or fobs that have been specified

in the code supplied to the

microcontroller

● The control system is fully functional

Hassan Aftab

Page 46: PRESENTATION #3

Prototype DemonstrationJustin Hatcher

Page 47: PRESENTATION #3

Project BudgetGabriel Sejas

Page 48: PRESENTATION #3

Items Purchased

Gabriel Sejas

Page 49: PRESENTATION #3

Project Budget Breakdown

Gabriel Sejas

● Control System: $221.73

● Charging System: $136.43

● Locking System: $89.10

● Total Spent: $447.26

Page 50: PRESENTATION #3

ConclusionJustin Hatcher

Page 51: PRESENTATION #3

Project Conclusion

● A fully functional charging and docking station was designed and prototyped

● All major goals of the project were achieved:

○ The station securely locks the eBike

○ The station efficiently charges the eBike

○ The station requires minimal user interaction

● The station provides a solid base in which more sophisticated station can be

built upon in the future

Justin Hatcher

Page 52: PRESENTATION #3

Path Forward

● Weatherproofing of the station

● Aesthetically pleasing shell/cover

● Updated RFID module with active cards and fobs

● Cloud based user and eBike identification system

● Solar panel canopy

Justin Hatcher

Page 53: PRESENTATION #3

Questions?