Presentation 1 If

download Presentation 1 If

of 41

Transcript of Presentation 1 If

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    1/41

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    2/41

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    3/41

    1.1 Why Study International

    Finance In today's world finance cannot beanything but international

    Enormous growth in the volume ofinternational trade

    Cross border capital flows and, in

    particular, direct investment have alsogrown enormously

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    4/41

    1.1 Why Study InternationalFinance (contd.)

    Veritable revolution has been taking place

    in the money and capital markets around the

    world

    Liberalization, integration and innovation

    have created a giant international financialmarket which is extremely dynamic and

    complex

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    5/41

    Multilateral negotiations regarding phased

    removal of trade barriers have made

    considerable progress and WTO had emerged as

    a meaningful platform

    Post war, World trade has grown faster than

    World GDP

    Almost all countries getting integrated with

    the global economy

    1.1 Why Study InternationalFinance (contd.)

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    6/41

    1.1 Why Study InternationalFinance (contd.)

    Indian economy needs substantial amountsof foreign capital to augment domesticsavings

    Technology up-gradation in India willrequire continuing import of foreigntechnology, hardware and software

    Indias increasing recourse to commercialborrowings and direct and portfolioinvestments by nonresidents

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    7/41

    1.1 Why Study InternationalFinance (contd.)

    The efforts of Indian companies to diversifyinto exports of engineering equipment andturnkey projects will have to be supported

    by the ability to offer long term financing tobuyers

    A number of companies particularly in theIndian IT sector have begun venturingabroad for strategic reasons either aspartners in joint ventures or by establishingforeign subsidiaries

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    8/41

    GLOBALIZATIONOn or Off?

    Economic "globalization" refers to the increasing integration

    of economies around the world, particularly through the

    movement of goods, services, and capital across borders. The

    term sometimes also refers to the movement of people (labor)

    and knowledge (technology) across international borders.

    The term "globalization" began to be used more commonly in

    the 1980s, reflecting technological advances that made it

    easier and quicker to complete international transactions

    both trade and financial flows.

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    9/41

    There are countless indicators that illustrate how goods, capital,

    and people, have become more globalized.

    The value of trade (goods and services) as a percentage of worldGDP increased from 42.1 percent in 1980 to 62.1 percent in 2007.

    Foreign direct investment increased from 6.5 percent of world

    GDP in 1980 to 31.8 percent in 2006. The stock of international

    claims (primarily bank loans), as a percentage of world GDP,increased from roughly 10 percent in 1980 to 48 percent in 2006.

    All these trends have continued beyond 2006 but some reversal

    is predicted after the current crisis and economic slowdown

    The number of foreign workers has increased from 78 million

    people (2.4 percent of the world population) in 1965 to

    191 million people (3.0 percent of the world population) in 2005.

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    10/41

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    11/41

    FOREX MARKET TURNOVER (NET)

    DAILY AVERAGE, APRIL 2011

    (US$ BILLION)TOTAL 3988

    SPOT 1305

    OUTRIGHT FORWARDS 433

    SWAPS 2250

    US$ vs. OTHERS 2660.262

    EURO vs. OTHERS 1139.406

    JPY vs. OTHERS 509.731

    GBP vs. OTHERS 460.779

    CHF vs. OTHERS 208.790

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    12/41

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    13/41

    2.1 Objectives of The Firm

    In modern theory of finance the

    objective of the management of a firm is

    to maximize the current value of

    shareholders' wealth. Are we sure that:

    Current value maximization objective does

    not ignore the multi-period character of

    financial (and other) decisionsIt incorporates uncertainty in some way

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    14/41

    2.1 Objectives of The Firm

    (contd.)The concept of wealth maximization

    incorporates a multi-period horizon with any

    combination of dividends and capital gainsEquity shares are risky assets

    The modern theory of finance as represented

    by the famous Capital Asset Pricing Model

    (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory

    (APT) rests on the following three

    propositions

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    15/41

    2.1 Objectives of The Firm(contd.)

    Investors are "risk-averse"

    A risky asset has two types of risksassociated with it viz. the unsystematic,

    firm- specific risk and thesystematicriskRisk-averse investors will not worry about

    firm-specific, unsystematic risks sincethese risks are diversifiable

    Hence according to CAPMmitigating unsystematic risk wouldnot add shareholder value.

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    16/41

    2.2 Risk Management and Wealth

    MaximizationWhat should be the attitude of the firm'smanagement regarding firm-specific risks?

    Risks arising out of fluctuations in exchange

    rates, interest rates and commodity prices arepervasive, however they affect different firms in

    different ways and are therefore firm-specific or

    idiosyncratic

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    17/41

    2.2 Risk Management and WealthMaximization (contd.)

    The investment-financing inter-linkage predicts

    that firms with more growth opportunities are

    more likely to be hedgers than those with more

    stable businessesUnsystematic risks like exchange rate risks, if

    left unmanaged, increase the probability of the

    firm getting into financial distress

    This can have adverse long term consequences

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    18/41

    2.2 Risk Management and Wealth

    Maximization (contd.)In the case of a multinational firm whoseshareholders are scattered around the world, it

    is not clear exactly how hedging serves

    shareholder interests.Different shareholders have different currency

    habitats. A US multinational protecting its

    income measured in US dollars may actually

    hurt its German stockholders

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    19/41

    SOME TYPICAL CURRENCYRISK SITUATIONS

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    20/41

    It is December 1, 2009. An Indian pharmaceutical company

    has cleared a shipment of imported chemicals. The invoice is

    for $500,000 payable on March 3, 2010. The current

    exchange rate is Rs.46.60 per dollar. The recent history of

    the exchange rate shows a mixed trend with moderate

    volatility. During the latter half of 2007 dollar had shown

    considerable weakness against all currencies including the

    rupee. During early 2008, the rate was almost flat around

    Rs.40.00. Dollar was rising against the rupee in early 2009.

    An adverse movement in exchange rate will affect the firms

    cash flows. There is also the problem of how to value theimports for the purpose of product costing and pricing

    decisions. What should the firm do?

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    21/41

    A US firm has exported some computer peripherals to

    a German buyer. For customer relationship reasons the

    sale has been invoiced in buyers currency viz. Euro.The invoice is for1,000,000 to be settled 90 days from

    now. The current exchange rate is $1.4715 per Euro. The

    recent history of the dollar-euro rate shows a mixed

    down - up trend with some fluctuations. The firmsbankers are fairly bullish about the Euro despite the

    recessionary conditions in the major European

    economies viz. Germany and France. However US

    treasury secretary has expressed concern about the

    weak dollar.

    What should the firm do?

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    22/41

    Caterpillar is an American firm which manufactures

    heavy construction equipment. At the start of the

    1980s all its manufacturing operations were located

    in the US while it sold its products around the world

    priced in local currencies. Its nearest competitor was

    Komatsu of Japan. Around mid-1981 the US dollar

    started rising against all currencies and continuedrising month after month. Caterpillar found that its

    revenues measured in dollars were shrinking while

    costs kept pace with US inflation. Margins shrank. It

    could not compensate by raising local currency pricesin export markets because Komatsu was holding the

    price line.

    How could Caterpillar cope with this?

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    23/41

    3.1 The Nature of Exposure andRisk

    Macroeconomic environmentalrisks

    Core business risks

    While core business risks are specific to afirm, macroeconomic uncertainties affect allfirms in the economy

    Extent and nature of impact of even

    macroeconomic risks crucially depend uponthe nature of a firm's business

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    24/41

    3.1 The Nature of Exposure andRisk (contd.)

    The firm is "exposed" to uncertain changes in

    a number of variables in its environment -

    Risk Factors

    Long run response of the firm to these risks

    can involve significant changes in the firm's

    strategic posture

    Exchange rates and interest rates are two ofthe key macroeconomic risk factors

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    25/41

    3.1 The Nature of Exposure andRisk (contd.)

    Exchange rates, interest rates and inflation ratesare intimately interrelated

    Exposure and Risk

    Exposure is a measure of the sensitivity ofthe value of a performance measure tochanges in the relevant risk factor

    risk is a measure of the variability of the

    value of the performance measure attributableto the risk factor

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    26/41

    3.1 The Nature of Exposure and

    Risk (contd.)The magnitude of risk is determined by the

    magnitude of exposure and the degree of

    variability in the relevant risk factor e.g.Exchange rate risk depends on how sensitive

    is the performance indicator to exchange rate

    fluctuations and what is the extent of likely

    fluctuations in the exchange rate.

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    27/41

    Risk Management and WealthMaximization

    What should be the attitude of the firm'smanagement regarding firm-specificrisks?

    Risks arising out of fluctuations inexchange rates, interest rates andcommodity prices are pervasive; howeverthey affect different firms in different waysand are therefore firm-specific oridiosyncratic.

    Should the firm spend resources to

    manage such risks?

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    28/41

    Why Hedge?

    The value of a firm, according to financial

    theory, is the net present value of all

    expected future cash flows.

    Currency risk is defined roughly as thevariance in expected cash flows arising from

    unexpected exchange rate changes.

    A firm that hedges these exposures reducessome of the variance in the value of its

    future expected cash flows.

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    29/41

    Arguments against active hedging:

    Removing unsystematic risks does not add value.

    Stockholders can diversify

    M&M thesis: Shareholders can do it themselves

    Firm cannot beat efficient markets

    Risk removal is costlythose who take on the risk

    must be compensated. Will there be value addition

    after paying these costs?

    Active risk management must alter character of cash

    flows in a manner beneficial to shareholders and do it

    cheaper than what they can do on their own.

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    30/41

    Why Hedge? Reasons not to hedge

    However, is a reduction in the variability ofcash flows sufficient reason for currency risk

    management? Opponents of hedging state

    (among other things):

    Currency risk management reduces the varianceof the cash flows of the firm, but also usesvaluable resources.

    Management often conducts hedging activities

    that benefit management at the expense of theshareholders (agency conflict), i.e., large FX loss

    are more embarrassing than the large cost of

    hedging.

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    31/41

    Arguments for Hedging:

    Investment-Internal Finance linkage

    Costs of being perceived as being in financial distress

    Agency theoretic arguments

    Convex tax schedules

    Managers have better information and access to

    various financial markets than shareholders

    For an MNC with global shareholders with differentcurrency habitats it is not clear that hedging benefits

    allshareholders

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    32/41

    Why Hedge? Reasons to hedge

    Proponents of hedging cite:

    Reduction in risk in future cash flows improves the

    planning capability of the firm

    Reduction of risk in future cash flows reduces the

    likelihood that the firms cash flows will fall below

    a necessary minimum (the point offinancial

    distress)

    Management has a comparative advantage over the

    individual shareholder in knowing the actualcurrency risk of the firm

    Management is in better position to take advantage

    of disequilibrium conditions in the market

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    33/41

    Is Exchange Rate Risk Relevant?

    Purchasing Power Parity Argument:Exchange rate movements will be matched by

    price movements.

    PPP does not necessarily hold.

    The Investor Hedge Argument:

    MNC shareholders can hedge against exchange

    rate fluctuations on their own.The investors may not have complete

    information on corporate exposure. They may

    not have the capabilities to correctly insulate

    themselves too.

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    34/41

    Is Exchange Rate Risk Relevant?

    Currency Diversification Argument:An MNC that is well diversified should not be

    affected by exchange rate movements because of

    offsetting effects.

    This is a naive presumption.

    Stakeholder Diversification Argument:

    Well diversified stakeholders will be somewhatinsulated against losses experienced by an MNC

    due to exchange rate risk.

    MNCs may be affected in the same way because

    of exchange rate risk.

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    35/41

    An Example : A company has a US$ 500000 receivable from an

    American customer to be received 3 months from today. The

    current rupee-dollar rate is 47.50; The market is quoting a 3-

    month forward rate at 48.00;The forward rate can be taken as markets expectation of what

    the rupee-dollar rate will be 3 months from now. Thus the

    expected change in exchange rate is (48.00-47.50) or +0.50.

    Three months later, the rupee-dollar rate falls to 46.80.

    Total change: (46.80-47.50) = -0.70; Expected change : +0.50

    Unexpected change : -1.20

    Change in the value of receivable: (46.80-48.00)(500000)

    Exposure : [(46.80-48.00)($500000)]/(-1.20) = $500000

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    36/41

    Taxonomy of Currency Exposure

    Contractual(Transactions)

    Anticipated

    Cash Flow Accounting(Translation)

    Short Term

    Strategic Operating

    LongTerm

    Currency Exopsure

    C C i f i

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    37/41

    Moment in time when

    exchange rate changes

    Translation exposure

    Transaction exposure

    Operating exposure

    Time

    Changes in reported owners equity

    in consolidated financial statements

    caused by a change in exchange rates

    Change in expected future cash flows

    arising from an unexpected change in

    exchange rates

    Impact of settling outstanding obligations entered into before change

    in exchange rates but to be settled after change in exchange rates

    Conceptual Comparison of Transaction,

    Operating and Accounting Foreign Exchange

    Exposure

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    38/41

    t1 t2 t3 t4Seller quotes

    a price to buyer(in verbal or

    written form)

    Buyer places

    firm order withseller at price

    offered at time t1

    Seller ships

    product andbills buyer

    (becomes A/R)

    Buyer settles A/R

    with cash inamount of currency

    quoted at time t1

    QuotationExposure

    BacklogExposure

    BillingExposure

    Time between quoting

    a price and reaching a

    contractual sale

    Time it takes to

    fill the order after

    contract is signed

    Time it takes to

    get paid in cash after

    A/R is issued

    Time and Events

    The life span of a transaction exposure

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    39/41

    3.4 Classification of Foreign ExchangeExposure and Risk (contd.)

    Transactions Exposures result from anunanticipated change in the exchange rate

    which has an impact - favorable or adverse - on

    thefirms

    cash flows during the upcomingaccounting period. Most often, the term is used

    to denote exposures on items the foreign

    currency values of which are contractually fixed

    export receivables, import payables, interestpayable etc.

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    40/41

    3.4 Classification of Foreign ExchangeExposure and Risk (contd.)

    Transaction risk can be defined as a measureof variability in the value of assets and liabilities

    when they are liquidated

    Points to be noted areTransactions exposures usually have short

    time horizons;

    Operating cash flows are affected; exchange

    gains/losses have tax implications

  • 7/31/2019 Presentation 1 If

    41/41

    3.4 Classification of Foreign ExchangeExposure and Risk (contd.)

    Translation exposure arises when a firm has

    A foreign operation such as a branch, a joint venture or

    100% subsidiary in a foreign currency.

    The home country law requires that the parent must

    translate financial statements of foreign operations from

    foreign to home currency and consolidate with parent

    financial statements. Foreign currency fluctuations lead to translation gains

    or losses. No cash flow implications