Presentación de PowerPoint · Learning Factory : The path to Industry 4.0 Felipe Baenaa*, Alvaro...
Transcript of Presentación de PowerPoint · Learning Factory : The path to Industry 4.0 Felipe Baenaa*, Alvaro...
1
¿Why?
Learning Factory : The path to Industry 4.0
Felipe Baenaa*, Alvaro Guarina, Julian Moraa ,Joel Sauzab Sebastian Retatc
aTechnologies for Production Research Group EAFIT University, Carrera 49#7 sur-50
Medellin , Colombia 2
Agenda
1. Introduction:Engineering Education and Engineering challenges
Learning Factories
3
2.Research processIdentification of literature
Quantitative text analysis
Qualitative text analysis
4. Conclusions
3.Transformation model: From lab to Learning Factory
The Pillars
The four transformations
Our experience
The Context : World
12 of the first 18 countries in the innovation index are from EUROPE
¿What is the role of the Engineering and Engineering Education
in a nations development?
Introduction
4
Engineers and the development of empires
First school of engineering France 1747.(Lucena & Schneider, 2008)
Engineers and the development of
independent nation-states1820 the U.S. government began training military
engineers.
(Lucena 2007)
Engineers And international
developmentThe dominant concern in the competences of engineers has
been mastery of engineering science 1945.(Lucena & Schneider, 2008)
Introduction
5
Engineering Education
Engineers and the development of empires
First school of engineering France 1747.(Lucena & Schneider, 2008)
Engineers and the development of
independent nation-states1820 the U.S. government began training military engineers.
(Lucena 2007)
Engineers andinternational development
The dominant concern in the competences of engineers has been mastery of engineering science 1945.
(Lucena & Schneider, 2008)
Introduction
And Now?
6
Engineering and Engineering Education 2017:
Introduction
The industry 4.0 The challenges Training and continuing professional development as
priority areas for actions within industry 4.0
implementation. (Kagermann,
Helbig, Hellinger, & Wahlster, 2013)
New learning approaches are needed (Abele et al., 2015)
Sustainable Development and sustainability(WFEO
2016),(UNESCO,2010)
Strong skills in human relations (Male, Bush, & Chapman,
2010) (WFEO 2016),(UNESCO,2010)7
-Sustainable Development and sustainability(WFEO 2016),(UNESCO,2010)
-New teaching-learning methods(WFEO 2016),((Abele & Reinhart, 2011), (Crawley, Malmqvist, Ostlund, &
Brodeur, 2007)
Strong skills in human relations(Male, Bush, & Chapman, 2010)
Balance between practice and
theory.(Litzinger, Lattuca, Hadgraft, &
Newstetter, 2011)
Engineering Education: Challenges
¿What initiatives have been proposed to address these challenges?
Introduction
8
Learning Factories
Introduction
9
*Highly complex learning environments that allow a high-quality, self-contained
competency development (teaching learning perspective)
Idealized replicas
learning
Introduction
10
Learning Factory Penn State University
Toyota LAB -Rochester Institute of
Technology
Center for Industrial Productivity (CiP)
Darmstadt
1995 2006 2007 2008
Tu-Dortmund Industrial Engineering-
Training centre
Lean Center Volkswagen
2008
Experimental and Digital Factory (EDF)
TU Chemnitz
20092011
McKinsey Capability Center (MCC) Atlanta
Many more
11
Learning Factory Penn State University
Toyota LAB -Rochester Institute of
Technology
Center for Industrial Productivity (CiP)
Darmstadt
1995 2006 2007 2008
Tu-Dortmund Industrial Engineering-
Training centre
Lean Center Volkswagen
2008
Experimental and Digital Factory (EDF)
TU Chemnitz
20092011
McKinsey Capability Center (MCC) Atlanta
Many more
12
¿How to build a learning factory to our university??
13
¿What?To Develop the EAFIT University Learning Factory(LF)
¿How?1.Identifying the main characteristics of the developed
Learning Factories and 2.Implementing a model to build
the main aspects of a LF.
¿For what?To develop competences through the Integration of
industrial trends, academic contents and experiential learning strategies under a didactic framework.
Project
¿What are the main characteristics of the developed learning factories?
Problem
14
Research process
¿What are the main characteristics of the developed learning factories?
Identification of literature
Quantitative text analysis
(Roberts, 2000)
Qualitative text analysis
(Marshall & Rossman, 2014)
15
• Identification of literature: Key phrases used for this search were
composed by the terms "learning factories" and "learningfactory", obtaining a result of 123 papers( July -2016).
42%
33%
7%
6%6%
6%
Country/territory
Germany
United States
62%10%
9%
8%
5%6%
Subject area
EngineeringBusiness, Management and Accounting
Social Sciences
Research process
65%30%
Documents by type
Conference PaperArticleConference Review
16
• Quantitative text analysis (Roberts, 2000):
Research process
78
46 4441 41
3733 33
30 29
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Nu
mb
er
of
oc
cu
rre
nc
es
Words list: Educational purposes
Quantitative text analysis
79
65
59
48 47 45 43
2319 17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Nu
mb
er
of
oc
cu
rre
nc
es
Words list: Engineering purposes
Quantitative text analysis
17
• Quantitative text analysis:
Research process
78
46 4441 41
3733 33
30 29
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Nu
mb
er
of
oc
cu
rre
nc
es
Words list: Educational purposes
Quantitative text analysis
79
65
59
48 47 45 43
2319 17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Nu
mb
er
of
oc
cu
rre
nc
es
Words list: Engineering purposes
Quantitative text analysis
Engineering Education + Manufacture
18
Cluster1: Target group
Universities
Graduates
Undergraduates
Engineering Education
19
Cluster2: Educational goal
Project development
Research
Knowledge development
Development of experience
Cluster3: Learning strategies
Based- practice
Action oriented
Active learning
Experiential learning
Cluster4: Value chain areas
Manufacture
Production
Design
Management
Logistics
Cluster5: Technologies
ICT
Software
Additive manufacturing
RFID
Cyberphysical
IoT
Cluster6: Engineering goals
Efficiency
Technologies
Sustainable
Cluster7: Strategies
Changeable systems
Management
Lean
Adaptable Manufacturing
Industry 4.0
• Qualitative text analysis(Marshall & Rossman, 2014):Research process
¿How to transform the engineering practices towards learning factory concept?
Problem
20
Tree Pillars of Transformation
Model
Did
acti
c P
illa
r
Inte
gra
tio
n P
illa
r
En
gin
eeri
ng
Pilla
r
Learning Factory EAFIT University
• Target group• Educational goal• Learning strategies
• Value chain areas
• Technologies• Engineering goals• Strategies
21
Product
Production
ICT Factory
Industry 4.0
1.Transformation: Creating Value
2.Transformation: Creation of the value chain
3.Transformation: Development of information and Communication technologies infrastructure for the Learning Factory
4.Transformation: Convergence of the real world and cyber physical systems
Learning Factory EAFIT University
Inte
gration
Pillar
Engin
ee
ring P
illar
Did
actic Pillar
Model
22
Product
• Manufacturing processes are related by the introduction of a product.
• Emphasis on evidence value added concept
• Evaluation of cost, quality and time variables individually as the set of operations
• Linking CAD, CAM and CAE tools.
Production
• Emphasis to evidence the concept of value chain.
• Linking some of the value chain activities for the Learning Factory (production planning and control, quality control, internal and external logistics, customer service, manufacturing and assembly operations)
• Related Tools: CAD, CAM, CAE, Process Simulation, ERP, PLM, Lean Manufacturing, DFX and Process Virtualization and Linking additive manufacturing
ICT Factory
• Real-time acquisition and storage of data (sensors, RFID systems, artificial vision, augmented reality, cloud)
• Automation of some production processes through industrial robotics.
• Infrastructure to control and communicate machines, operators and resources remotely. (IoT)
Industry 4.0
• Interconnection of the physical world and the cyber world
• Virtual copy of the productive systems.
• Decentralized and autonomous decisions of the productive system
• Analysis, simulation and optimization of the value chain in real time.
1.Transformation: Creating Value
2.Transformation: Creation of the value chain
3.Transformation: Development of information and communication technologies infrastructure for the Learning Factory
4.Transformation: Convergence of the real world and cyber physical systems
Did
actic Pillar
Learning Factory EAFIT University
Inte
gration
Pillar
Engin
ee
ring P
illar
Model
23
Our Experience
Our Experience
24
First Transformation: Creating ValueOur Experience
What?
• To Integrate the manufacturing resources in a didactic environment
How?
• Product introduction
• Active and experientiallearning activities
• Identifying the productive chain
• Linking CAD, CAM and CAE tools
For what?
• To develop the value added concept in a real environment
25
First Transformation: Creating Value Our Experience
26
First Transformation: Creating ValueOur Experience
27
First Transformation: Creating ValueOur Experience
28
First Transformation: FeedbackOur Experience
• Cost of the practices
• Low production rates
• Fixed production processes
29
• Realistic environment
• Hands on experience
• Course evaluations
• Integration of topics
Our Experience
What?
• Integration of real sections of the production chain in a didactic environment .
How?
• Assembly Line introduction
• Product introduction
• Active and experientiallearning activities
• Identifying the industrial chain
• Introducing value chain activities
To do what?
• To develop the value chain concept in a real environment
• Integration of value chain activities in a real environment
Second Transformation: Creation of the value chain
30
31
Chess Manufacturing
Second Transformation: Creation of the value chain
The Chess Chess Manufacturing Line
Supplier vehicle
Raw material warehouse
Finished product warehouse
Simulation workstations
Assembly work stations
Conveyor
Our ExperienceSecond Transformation: Creation of the value chain
32
Our Experience
Second Transformation: Creation of the value chain
CAD, CAM, 3D Printing and PLM
Process SimulationInbound logistic
Reconfigurable assembly line
33
Operations
Second Transformation: FeedbackOur Experience
•Low teacher training in active and experiential learning strategies.
• Integration value chain
•Flexibility
34
Third TransformationOur Experience
ICT Factory
What?
• To integrate ICT infrastructure in the LF
How?
Based on 5C architecture for implementation of Cyber-Physical System. (Lee 2015)
39
Th
e F
ou
rth
Tra
nsfo
rmati
on Our Experience
36
Th
e F
ou
rth
Tra
nsfo
rmati
on Our Experience
37
LF 4.0EAFIT University
Virtualization
IoT
Additive manufacturing
Robotics
Augmented reality
Th
e F
ou
rth
Tra
nsfo
rmati
on Our Experience
38
LF 4.0EAFIT University
Virtualization
IoT
Additive manufacturing
Robotics
Cloud Computing
Augmented reality
Artificial intelligence
CPS
?
?
??
Big Data
Cybersecurity
Conclusions of our experience
39
LF EAFIT University
M. Tisch, C. Hertle, E. Abele, J. Metternich, and R. Tenberg, “Learning factory
design: a competency-oriented approach integrating three design levels,”
Learning Factory : The path to Industry 4.0
Felipe Baenaa*,
Alvaro Guarina, Julian Moraa ,Joel Sauzab Sebastian Retatc
aTechnologies for Production Research Group EAFIT University, Carrera 49#7 sur-50
Medellin , Colombia 40
Mail: [email protected]
Bibliography• [1] WorldBank, World Development Indicators 2016. World Bank Publications, 2016.
• [2]J. E. S. Castro, P. N. P. Pérez, and G. S. Pérez, “Concentración de la industria manufacturera en Colombia, 2001-2010: una aproximación a partir del indice de Herfindahl-Hirschman,” Diálogos de saberes: investigaciones y ciencias sociales, no. 40, pp. 115–138, 2014.
• [3] U. Wagner, T. AlGeddawy, H. ElMaraghy, and E. Müller, “Developing products for changeable learning factories,” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 9, pp. 146–158, 2015.
• [4] J. Posada, C. Toro, I. Barandiaran, D. Oyarzun, D. Stricker, R. de Amicis, E. B. Pinto, P. Eisert, J. Dollner, and I. Vallarino, “Visual Computing as a Key Enabling Technology for Industrie 4.0 and Industrial Internet,” Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 26–40, 2015.
• [5] M. Hermann, T. Pentek, and B. Otto, “Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios,” in 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2016, pp. 3928–3937.
• [6] H. Kagermann, J. Helbig, A. Hellinger, and W. Wahlster, Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion, 2013.
• [7] M. Tisch, C. Hertle, E. Abele, J. Metternich, and R. Tenberg, “Learning factory design: a competency-oriented approach integrating three design levels,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, pp. 1–21, 2015.
• [8] E. Abele, J. Metternich, M. Tisch, G. Chryssolouris, W. Sihn, H. ElMaraghy, V. Hummel, and F. Ranz, “Learning Factories for research, education, and training,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 32, pp. 1–6, 2015.
• [9] J. Lucena and J. Schneider, “Engineers, development, and engineering education: From national to sustainable community development,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 247–257, 2008.
• [10] UNESCO, “Engineering: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Development,” 2010.
• [11]I. Phase and others, Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academies Press, 2005.
41
• [12 ]S. Male, M. Bush, and E. Chapman, “Perceptions of competency deficiencies in engineering graduates,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 55–68, 2010.
• [13] T. Litzinger, L. R. Lattuca, R. Hadgraft, and W. Newstetter, “Engineering education and the development of expertise,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 123–150, 2011.
• [14]J. C. Cañón Rodriguez and J. Salazar Contreras, “La calidad de la educación en ingenieria: un factor clave para el desarrollo,” Ingenieria e Investigación, vol. 31, pp. 40–50, 2011.
• [15] J. Cachay, J. Wennemer, E. Abele, and R. Tenberg, “Study on action-oriented learning with a Learning Factory approach,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 55, pp. 1144–1153, 2012.
• [16 ]S. Kreitlein, A. Hӧft, S. Schwender, and J. Franke, “Green Factories Bavaria: A Network of Distributed Learning Factories for Energy Efficient Production,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 32, pp. 58–63, 2015.
• [17] L. Morell and M. Trucco, “A Proven Model to Re-Engineer Engineering Education in Partnership with Industry,” in World Engineering Education Forum, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2012.
• [18]"Brazil Model Factory (BMF) Salvador, “| McKinsey Capability Center Network", Capability-center.mckinsey.com, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://capability-center.mckinsey.com/brazil-model-factory-bmf-salvador-0. [Accessed: 04- Nov-2016 ].,” 2016.
• [19] “Ministry of Economy. Crafting the Future: a roadmap for Industry 4.0 in Mexico.,” 2016.
• [20] “National Confederation of Industry of Brazil. Industry 4.0 : a new challenge for Brazilian industry, Special Suvey ,” no. 2, 2016.
• [21] C. Roberts, “A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Text Analysis,” Quality and Quantity, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 259–274, 2000.
• [22] C. Marshall and G. B. Rossman, Designing qualitative research. Sage publications, 2014.
• [23] J. Mora-Orozco, Á. Guarin-Grisales, J. Sauza-Bedolla, G. D’Antonio, and P. Chiabert, “PLM in a Didactic Environment: The Path to Smart Factory,” in IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, 2015, pp. 640–648.
• [24]J. Lee, B. Bagheri, and H.-A. Kao, “A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems,” Manufacturing Letters, vol. 3, pp. 18–23, 2015.
42
Bibliography