PREPARED FOR ESTELL MANOR S DISTRICT CAPE M A ESTELL A R … · This audit is performed in...

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM: ENERGY AUDIT REPORT

PREPARED FOR: ESTELL MANOR SCHOOL DISTRICT 128 CAPE MAY AVENUE ESTELL MANOR, NJ 08319 ATTN: ROSE MILLAR

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR PREPARED BY: CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

520 S. BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NJ 08043 TELEPHONE: (856) 427-0200 FACSIMILE: (856) 427-6529 WWW.CONCORD-ENGINEERING.COM

CEG CONTACT: KEVIN BLANKENBUEHLER

PROJECT MANAGER EMAIL: [email protected]

REPORT ISSUANCE: FINAL, FEBRUARY 25, 2014

PROJECT NO: 1C13529

Estell Manor School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C13529 February 25, 2014 – FINAL Page 1 of 83

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 3

II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 9

III. METHOD OF ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 11

IV. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ............................................................... 13

A. ENERGY USAGE / TARIFFS .................................................................................................. 13

B. ENERGY USE INDEX (EUI) .................................................................................................. 20

C. EPA ENERGY BENCHMARKING SYSTEM ............................................................................. 22

V. FACILITY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 23

VI. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 26

VII. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 27

VIII. RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES ................................................ 70

IX. ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY .................................. 74

X. INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS.......................................................................... 79

XI. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 79

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations

Appendix G – High Efficiency Transformer Calculations



REPORT DISCLAIMER

The information contained within this report, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this report, in whole or in part, without written authorization from Concord Engineering Group, Inc., 520 S. Burnt Mill Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043.

This report may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this report in error, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.



I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the findings of the energy audit conducted for:

Estell Manor School Disitrct 128 Cape May Avenue

Estell Manor New Jersey 08319 District Contact Person: Rose Millar, Business Administrator

Facility Contract Person: James Pettit, Building & Grounds Supervisor

This audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program for the Estell Manor School District. The purpose of this analysis is to provide the owner insight into the energy savings potential that exists within the facility. Energy Efficiency changes and upgrades requires support from the building occupants, operations personnel and the administrators of the building in order to maximize the savings and overall benefit. The efficiency improvement of public buildings provides a benefit for the environment and the residents of New Jersey. The Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) identified within the report represent the potential annual savings at the facility. It is recommended to consider all ECMs as part of the District’s initiative to save energy, reduce emissions, and lower operating costs. The District should review and be familiar with all measures presented in the report prior to making a decision on which projects to move forward with. The annual energy costs at this facility are as follows: The potential annual energy cost savings for each energy conservation measure (ECM) and renewable energy measure (REM) are shown below in Table 1. Be aware that all ECM’s and REM’s are not additive because of the interrelation of some of the measures. This audit is consistent with an ASHRAE level 2 audit. The cost and savings for each measure is ± 20%. The evaluations are based on engineering estimations and industry standard calculation methods. More detailed analyses would require engineering simulation models, hard equipment specifications, and contractor bid pricing.

Electricity $ 89,580

Fuel Oil #2 Propane

$ 10,085 $ 2,147

Total $ 101,812



Table 1 Financial Summary Table

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade - Interior $825 $550 1.5 900.0%

ECM #2Lighting Upgrade - T8 to

LED$103,250 $5,008 20.6 -27.2%

ECM #3 Lighting Upgrade - Exterior $8,025 $1,392 5.8 160.2%

ECM #4 Lighting Controls $17,865 $2,386 7.5 100.3%

ECM #5 Refrigerator Replacement $780 $62 12.6 19.2%

ECM #6 CRT Monitor Replacement $375 $44 8.5 76.0%

ECM #7Computer Power

Optimization$10,000 $1,665 6.0 149.8%

ECM #8 De-stratification Fans $5,000 $412 12.1 23.6%

ECM #9 High Efficiency XFMR $26,000 $2,218 11.7 28.0%

ECM #10Fuel Conversion to Natural

Gas$9,000 $7,156 1.3 1092.7%

ECM #11 Electric to HW Conversion $190,000 $4,188 45.4 -55.9%

ECM #12 Rooftop HP Replacement $68,000 $1,030 66.0 -77.3%

ECM #13 Rooftop HP to Natural Gas $73,826 $1,332 55.4 -72.9%

ECM #14 Air to Air HP to Geothermal $194,900 $3,964 49.2 -59.3%

ECM #15Energy Star Kitchen

Equipment$14,000 $833 16.8 -10.8%

REM #1 95 kW Solar Array $425,787 $40,089 10.6 41.2%

Notes:

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTIONNET

INSTALLATION COST

ANNUAL

SAVINGSB

ANNUAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTIONSIMPLE

PAYBACK (Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)



Table 2 Energy Savings Summary Table

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade - Interior 1.0 3,549 0 0 0


LED12.0 25,860 0 0 0

ECM #3 Lighting Upgrade - Exterior 2.0 8,982 0 0 0

ECM #4 Lighting Controls 0.0 10,546 0 0 0

ECM #5 Refrigerator Replacement 0.0 399 0 0 0

ECM #6 CRT Monitor Replacement 0.2 287 0 0 0


Optimization0.0 10,744 0 0 0

ECM #8 De-stratification Fans 0.0 2,656 0 0 0

ECM #9 High Efficiency XFMR 2.8 14,312 0 0 0


Gas0.0 0 3,290 567 -5,092

ECM #11 Electric to HW Conversion 0.0 67,282 -2,033 0 0

ECM #12 Rooftop HP Replacement 2.9 6,645 0 0 0

ECM #13 Rooftop HP to Natural Gas 3.7 25,069 0 0 -2,553

ECM #14 Air to Air HP to Geothermal 8.7 25,574 0 0 0


Equipment0.0 0 0 220 0

REM #1 95 kW Solar Array 77.2 115,836 0 0 0

Notes: Utility reductions denoted with a "0" mean there are no associated savings for that measure.

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

FUEL OIL #2 (GALLONS)

PROPANE (GALLONS)


ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

FUEL OIL #2 (GALLONS)

PROPANE (GALLONS)



Table 3 Emissions Summary Table

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade - Interior 5,394 10 23


LED39,307 72 168

ECM #3 Lighting Upgrade - Exterior 13,653 25 58

ECM #4 Lighting Controls 16,030 30 69

ECM #5 Refrigerator Replacement 606 1 3

ECM #6 CRT Monitor Replacement 436 1 2


Optimization16,331 30 70

ECM #8 De-stratification Fans 4,037 7 17

ECM #9 High Efficiency XFMR 21,754 40 93


Gas21,321 (47) 0

ECM #11 Electric to HW Conversion 56,729 188 437

ECM #12 Rooftop HP Replacement 10,100 19 43

ECM #13 Rooftop HP to Natural Gas 8,235 47 163

ECM #14 Air to Air HP to Geothermal 38,872 72 166


Equipment0 0 0

Notes: A. Emissions Reduction based on NJCEP published factors for electric & gas.


ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION

CO2

EMISSIONS (LBS)

NOX

EMISSIONS (LBS)

SO2

EMISSIONS (LBS)



Table 4 Facility Project Summary Table

If natural gas becomes available to the facility additional cost savings could be realized altering the project scope and funding capability. Measures with a strike through represent projects not able to be funded in a potential ESIP Program; however this should not discourage consideration by the district with use of alternative funding mechanisms.

Lighting Upgrade - Interior $550 $1,025 $200 $825 1.5

Lighting Upgrade - T8 to LED

$5,008 $128,000 $24,750 $103,250 20.6

Lighting Upgrade - Exterior $1,392 $10,000 $1,975 $8,025 5.8

Lighting Controls $2,386 $18,000 $135 $17,865 7.5

Refrigerator Replacement $62 $780 $0 $780 12.6

CRT Monitor Replacement $44 $375 $0 $375 8.5

Computer Power Optimization

$1,665 $10,000 $0 $10,000 6.0

De-stratification Fans $412 $5,000 $0 $5,000 12.1

High Efficiency XFMR $2,218 $26,000 $0 $26,000 11.7

Fuel Conversion to Natural Gas

$7,156 $9,000 $0 $9,000 1.3

Electric to HW Conversion $4,188 $190,000 $0 $190,000 45.4

Rooftop HP Replacement $1,030 $68,000 $0 $68,000 66.0

Rooftop HP to Natural Gas

$1,332 $75,000 $1,174 $73,826 55.4

Air to Air HP to Geothermal

$3,964 $203,000 $8,100 $194,900 49.2

Energy Star Kitchen Equipment

$833 $14,500 $500 $14,000 16.8

Total Project $9,759 $139,180 $2,310 $136,870 14.0

FACILITY PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

SMART START

INCENTIVES

CUSTOMER COST

SIMPLE PAYBACK



Overall Assessment: Overall, the Estell Manor School is operating inefficiently for K-12 type buildings based on the national average. The District is also paying an average cost of energy at $2.35 per square-foot above the typical average costs of $2.00 per square-foot. On the whole, Concord Engineering recommends the District review and be familiar with all measures presented in the report prior to making a decision on which projects to move forward with. This will enable the District to effectively align report recommendations with those outlined in their mid/long range facility plans and financial plans, as well as the current referendum. The District should also review all conventional and unconventional funding, along with all NJCEP funding opportunities for these projects and determine which options fit the District’s budget most positively in the short and long term. The combination of this information will enable the District to put together an effective Energy Savings Improvement Strategy that maximizes the received benefits of the selected projects. Other Considerations: Renewable Energy Conservation Measures: Renewable Energy Measures (REMs) were also reviewed for implementation at the Estell Manor School. Concord Engineering utilized a roof mounted array to house a PV system. There is a total estimated solar system potential of 95 kW DC that could generate 115,836 kilowatt-hours annually offsetting 20% of the total energy purchased from the grid. The system’s calculated simple payback of 10.6 years is above the standard 10 year simple payback threshold; however, with alternative funding this payback could be lessened. Concord Engineering recommends the Owner review all funding options available with the implementation of this renewable energy measure. Energy Procurement Recommendations: The District is currently contracted with a third party supplier for the school for electric. It is recommended the District continue utilizing a 3rd party purchasing approach to energy. The District should consider trying to change the main electric account rate tariff from Monthly to Annual General Service to realize delivery cost savings. Further recommendations are outlined in the Energy Procurement Section. Maintenance and Operational Recommendations: In addition to the ECMs and REMs, there are maintenance and operational measures that can provide significant energy savings and provide immediate benefit. The ECMs listed above represent investments that can be made to the facility which are justified by the savings seen overtime. However, the maintenance items and small operational improvements are typically achievable with onsite staff or maintenance contractors and in turn have the potential to provide substantial operational savings compared to the costs associated. The recommendations outlined in Section XI should be considered a priority in achieving an energy efficient building.



II. INTRODUCTION

The comprehensive energy audit covers the 43,366 square foot Estell Manor School at 128 Cape May Avenue, owned by the Estell Manor School District. This audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program. The energy audit is conducted to promote the mission of the office of Clean Energy, which is to use innovation and technology to solve energy and environmental problems in a way that improves the State’s economy. This can be achieved through the wiser and more efficient use of energy. Electrical and fuel oil utility information is collected and analyzed for one full year’s energy use of the building. The utility information allows for analysis of the building’s operational characteristics; calculate energy benchmarks for comparison to industry averages, estimated savings potential, and baseline usage/cost to monitor the effectiveness of implemented measures. A computer spreadsheet is used to calculate benchmarks and to graph utility information (see the utility profiles below). The Energy Use Index (EUI) is established for the building. Energy Use Index (EUI) is expressed in British Thermal Units/square foot/year (BTU/ft2/yr), which is used to compare energy consumption to similar building types or to track consumption from year to year in the same building. The EUI is calculated by converting the annual consumption of all energy sources to BTU’s and dividing by the area (gross square footage) of the building. Blueprints (where available) are utilized to verify the gross area of the facility. The EUI is a good indicator of the relative potential for energy savings. A low EUI indicates less potential for energy savings, while a high EUI indicates poor building performance therefore a high potential for energy savings. Existing building architectural and engineering drawings (where available) are utilized for additional background information. The building envelope, lighting systems, HVAC equipment, and controls information gathered from building drawings allow for a more accurate and detailed review of the building. The information is compared to the energy usage profiles developed from utility data. Through the review of the architectural and engineering drawings a building profile can be defined that documents building age, type, usage, major energy consuming equipment or systems, etc. The preliminary audit information is gathered in preparation for the site survey. The site survey provides critical information in deciphering where energy is spent and opportunities exist within a facility. The entire site is surveyed to inventory the following to gain an understanding of how each facility operates:

Building envelope (roof, windows, etc.) Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment (HVAC) Lighting systems and controls Facility-specific equipment



The building site visit is performed to survey all major building components and systems. The site visit includes detailed inspection of energy consuming components. Summary of building occupancy schedules, operating and maintenance practices, and energy management programs provided by the building manager are collected along with the system and components to determine a more accurate impact on energy consumption.



III. METHOD OF ANALYSIS This audit is consistent with an ASHRAE level 2 audit. The cost and savings for each measure is ± 20%. The evaluations are based on engineering estimations and industry standard calculation methods. More detailed analyses would require engineering simulation models, hard equipment specifications, and contractor bid pricing. Post site visit work includes evaluation of the information gathered, researching possible conservation opportunities, organizing the audit into a comprehensive report, and making recommendations on HVAC, lighting and building envelope improvements. Data collected is processed using energy engineering calculations to anticipate energy usage for each of the proposed energy conservation measures (ECMs). The actual building’s energy usage is entered directly from the utility bills provided by the owner. The anticipated energy usage is compared to the historical data to determine energy savings for the proposed ECMs. It is pertinent to note, that the savings noted in this report are not additive. The savings for each recommendation is calculated as standalone energy conservation measures. Implementation of more than one ECM may in some cases affect the savings of each ECM. The savings may in some cases be relatively higher if an individual ECM is implemented in lieu of multiple recommended ECMs. For example implementing reduced operating schedules for inefficient lighting will result in a greater relative savings. Implementing reduced operating schedules for newly installed efficient lighting will result in a lower relative savings, because there is less energy to be saved. The project / Entity summary tables are based on the implementation of multiple measures. The analysis is reviewed and determined if the nature of the ECMs will cause a major conflict of the overall savings. When additive measures do not cause a major effect on the overall savings the ECMs are included. Where a major conflict is identified, the combined savings is evaluated appropriately to ensure the overall estimates are ± 20%. ECMs are determined by identifying the building’s unique properties and deciphering the most beneficial energy saving measures available that meet the specific needs of the facility. The building construction type, function, operational schedule, existing conditions, and foreseen future plans are critical in the evaluation and final recommendations. Energy savings are calculated based on industry standard methods and engineering estimations. Energy consumption is calculated based on manufacturer’s cataloged information when new equipment is proposed. Cost savings are calculated based on the actual historical energy costs for the facility. Installation costs include labor and equipment costs to estimate the full up-front investment required to implement a change. Costs are derived from Means Cost Data, industry publications, and local contractors and equipment suppliers. The NJ Smart Start Building® program incentives savings (where applicable) are included for the appropriate ECM’s and subtracted from the installed cost. Maintenance savings are calculated where applicable and added to the energy savings for each ECM. The life-time for each ECM is estimated based on the typical life of the equipment being replaced or altered. The costs and savings are applied and a simple payback, simple lifetime savings, and simple return on investment are calculated. See below for calculation methods:



ECM Calculation Equations:

SavingsYearly

CostNetPaybackSimple

LifetimeECMSavingsYearlySavingsLifetimeSimple

CostNet

Cost)NetSavingsLifetime(SimpleROILifetimeSimple

LifetimeECMSavingseMaintenancYearlySavingseMaintenancLifetime

N

0nnIRR1

PeriodofFlowCashReturnofRateInternal

N

0nnDR1

PeriodofFlowCashValuePresentNet

Net Present Value calculations are based on Discount Rate of 3%.



IV. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST

A. Energy Usage / Tariffs The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The facility receives electric distribution service through Atlantic City Electric (ACE) under their Monthly General Service (MGS) rate structure. The District has contracted Amerada Hess, and most recently First Energy, a Third Party Supplier (TPS), to provide electric commodity supply (generation) service. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The oil usage profile shows the actual oil consumption for the facility normalized over an entire year. Oil is provided by Pedroni and Riggins to the facility. The oil provider measures consumption in gallons. One Gallon of #2 oil is equivalent to 140,000 BTUs of energy. The propane usage profile shows the actual propane consumption for the facility normalized over an entire year. Propane is provided by Suburban Propane and Modern Gas to the facility. The propane provider measures consumption in gallons. One Gallon of propane is equivalent to 91,600 BTUs of energy. The overall cost for utilities is calculated by dividing the total cost by the total usage. Based on the utility history provided, the average cost for utilities at this facility is as follows: Description Average

Electricity 15.5¢ / kWh Fuel Oil #2 $3.07 / gallon

Propane $3.79 / gallon



Table 5 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Atlantic City ElectricRate: Monthly General Service

Meter No: 7635099; 58696530Account No: 0219 4119 9990; 0219 4129 9998

Third Party Utility Provider: Amerada Hess, First Energy TPS Meter / Acct No: -

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION KWH TOTAL BILL

Jan-13 63,444 $8,725

Feb-13 66,438 $9,148

Mar-13 60,925 $8,387

Apr-13 36,137 $5,005

May-13 32,230 $5,919

Jun-13 32,764 $6,204

Jul-13 44,473 $8,101

Aug-13 36,301 $6,999

Sep-13 38,221 $7,534

Oct-13 33,758 $2,872

Nov-13 47,231 $7,397

Dec-13 85,351 $13,289

Totals 577,273 116.3 Max $89,580

AVERAGE DEMAND 69.5 KW average

AVERAGE RATE $0.155 $/kWh

50.1

49.6

56.3

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

DEMAND KW

48.2

49.1

47.6

49.7

116.3

115.5

115.6

58.8

57.7



Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile



Table 6 Fuel Oil #2 Billing Data

Utility Provider: Pedroni, RigginsAccount No: 1263J; 18660032

Rate: Based on Time of Delivery Price

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

(GALLONS)TOTAL BILL

Jan-13 485.71 $1,536.80

Feb-13 514.29 $1,627.20

Mar-13 500.00 $1,405.00

Apr-13 500.00 $1,405.00

May-13 0.00 $0.00

Jun-13 0.00 $0.00

Jul-13 0.00 $0.00

Aug-13 0.00 $0.00

Sep-13 0.00 $0.00

Oct-13 349.40 $1,123.31

Nov-13 349.40 $1,123.31

Dec-13 591.17 $1,864.31

TOTALS 3,289.96 $10,084.94

AVERAGE RATE: $3.07 $/Gallon

FUEL OIL USAGE SUMMARY



Figure 2 Fuel Oil #2 Usage Profile



Table 7 Propane Billing Data

Utility Provider: Suburban Propane, Modern GasAccount No: 2115-000233057-001

Rate: Based on Time of Delivery Price

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

(GALLONS)TOTAL BILL

Jan-13 19.21 $64.66

Feb-13 42.70 $142.90

Mar-13 79.80 $256.43

Apr-13 57.62 $185.10

May-13 55.76 $179.13

Jun-13 57.62 $185.10

Jul-13 0.00 $0.00

Aug-13 0.00 $0.00

Sep-13 62.80 $274.40

Oct-13 47.10 $205.80

Nov-13 67.94 $308.24

Dec-13 76.17 $345.60

TOTALS 566.73 $2,147.37

AVERAGE RATE: $3.79 $/Gallon

PROPANE USAGE SUMMARY



Figure 3 Propane Usage Profile



B. Energy Use Index (EUI) Energy Use Index (EUI) is a measure of a building’s annual energy utilization per square foot of building. This calculation is completed by converting all utility usage consumed by a building for one year, to British Thermal Units (BTU) and dividing this number by the building square footage. EUI is a good measure of a building’s energy use and is utilized regularly for comparison of energy performance for similar building types. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Buildings Technology Center under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy maintains a Benchmarking Building Energy Performance Program. The ORNL website determines how a building’s energy use compares with similar facilities throughout the U.S. and in a specific region or state. Source use differs from site usage when comparing a building’s energy consumption with the national average. Site energy use is the energy consumed by the building at the building site only. Source energy use includes the site energy use as well as all of the losses to create and distribute the energy to the building. Source energy represents the total amount of raw fuel that is required to operate the building. It incorporates all transmission, delivery, and production losses, which allows for a complete assessment of energy efficiency in a building. The type of utility purchased has a substantial impact on the source energy use of a building. The EPA has determined that source energy is the most comparable unit for evaluation purposes and overall global impact. Both the site and source EUI ratings for the building are provided to understand and compare the differences in energy use. The site and source EUI for this facility is calculated as follows:

FootageSquareBuilding

kBtuinUsageGaskBtuinUsageElectricEUISiteBuilding

)(

FootageSquareBuilding

RatioSSXkBtuinUsageGasRatioSSXkBtuinUsageElectricEUISourceBuilding

)(



Table 8 Facility Energy Use Index (EUI) Calculation

Figure 3 below depicts a national EUI grading for the source use of Elementary Schools.

Figure 4

Source Energy Use Intensity Distributions: Elementary Schools

Based on the above source energy comparison the Estell Manor School is operating inefficiently, compared to buildings of similar type.

kWh Therms Gallons kBtu kBtu

ELECTRIC 577,273.0 1,970,810 3.140 6,188,343

FUEL OIL 3,290.0 457,305 1.010 461,878

PROPANE 566.7 51,759 1.010 52,277

TOTAL 2,479,874 6,702,498

BUILDING AREA 43,366 SQUARE FEET

BUILDING SITE EUI 57.18 kBtu/SF/YR

BUILDING SOURCE EUI 154.56 kBtu/SF/YR

ENERGY USE INTENSITY CALCULATION

ENERGY TYPESITE-

SOURCE RATIO

BUILDING USESITE

ENERGYSOURCE ENERGY

*Site - Source Ratio data is provided by the Energy Star Performance Rating Methodology for Incorporating Source Energy Use document issued Dec 2007.

SOURCE EUI = 154

NAT’L MEDIAN SOURCE EUI = 130



C. EPA Energy Benchmarking System The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in an effort to promote energy management has created a system for benchmarking energy use amongst various end users. The benchmarking tool utilized for this analysis is entitled Portfolio Manager. The Portfolio Manager tool allows tracking and assessment of energy consumption via the template forms located on the ENERGY STAR website (www.energystar.gov). The importance of benchmarking for local government municipalities is becoming more important as utility costs continue to increase and emphasis is being placed on carbon reduction, greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts. Based on information gathered from the ENERGY STAR website, Government agencies spend more than $10 billion a year on energy to provide public services and meet constituent needs. Furthermore, energy use in commercial buildings and industrial facilities is responsible for more than 50 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. It is vital that local government municipalities assess facility energy usage, benchmark energy usage utilizing Portfolio Manager, set priorities and goals to lessen energy usage and move forward with priorities and goals. In accordance with the Local Government Energy Audit Program, Concord has created an ENERGY STAR account for the municipality to access and monitoring the facility’s yearly energy usage as it compares to facilities of similar type. The login page for the account can be accessed at the following web address; the username and password are also listed below:

https://www.energystar.gov/istar/pmpam/index.cfm?fuseaction=login.login

The utility bills and other information gathered during the energy audit process are entered into the Portfolio Manager. The following is a summary of the results for the facility:

Table 8 ENERGY STAR Performance Rating

ENERGY STAR PERFORMANCE RATING

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

ENERGY PERFORMANCE

RATING

NATIONAL AVERAGE

Estell Manor School 32 50

Refer to Statement of Energy Performance Appendix for the detailed energy summary.



V. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The 43,366 square-foot Estell Manor School is a one story building located at 128 Cape May Avenue, Estell Manor, New Jersey. The building was built in 1955 with three additions one in 1975 that added classrooms and a cafeteria, another in 1995 that added classrooms and the main office, and the more recent in 2004 that added the gymnasium and two classrooms. The school serves students grades kindergarten through 8th. The space types in the facility consist of classrooms, offices, a cafeteria, a gymnasium, restrooms, a library, a boiler room, and utility/storage rooms.

Occupancy Profile

The building is occupied from approximately 6:00 am till 9:00 pm Monday through Friday, with limited occupancy hours on the weekend. However the school is beginning to see increased use through community activities. Students occupy the facility for approximately 10 months out of the year, and the Offices located in the facility are occupied year round. There are approximately 200 students and 40 staff in the building.

Building Envelope

The exterior of the building is masonry brick throughout the building with concrete block interior walls, with insulation ranging from 1 to 2 inches. Windows through the building are double pane glass with aluminum frames. The roof is a flat built up rubber roof with insulation ranging from 2 to 5 inches.

HVAC Systems

The school consists of multiple system types including steam, electric heating, air to air heat pump, and geothermal that were installed during each addition made to the building.

The 1955 wing is conditioned by a steam unit ventilators and radiators located in each classroom. These units are manufactured by Nesbitt and provide limited control. Each classroom and office in this wing also has a window air conditioning unit to provide cooling, each with a rated capacity of 12,000 Btu/hour and an efficiency rating of 9.8 EER or less. Steam is provided by a single oil fired Weil McLain boiler cast iron sectional boiler with an input rating of 1080 MBH and efficiency of 81%. The boiler is fitted with outside air controls to modulate the boiler on and off.

The 1975 wing is conditioned by heating on unit ventilators with electric heating coils. The units have electric coils with an estimated size of 10 to 15 kilowatts. Along with the unit ventilator each classroom has a window air conditioning unit with a rated capacity of 12,000 Btu/hour and an efficiency rating of 9.8 EER.

The 1995 wing is conditioned by air to air heat pump unit ventilators in the classrooms and rooftop heat pump units that serve the main office and a single classroom. The unit ventilators are manufactured by Trane with a cooling capacity of 3.5 tons and an electric backup heating coil of 13.2 kilowatts. These units have a cooling efficiency of 9.5 SEER and a heating



performance of 3.2 COP. The main office and classroom 109 are conditioned by Trane rooftop heat pumps ranging in cooling capacity from 3 to 6.5 tons with electric heating coils from 6 to 18 kilowatts. The units have a cooling efficiency of 9 EER and heating efficiency of 3 COP.

The 2004 wing is conditioned by geothermal heat pump units. The classroom, restrooms, corridors, and gym office are conditioned by three horizontal ceiling units and one vertical unit. These units are manufactured by Florida Heat pump with capacities ranging from 1 ton to 6 tons and cooling efficiencies of 14 EER and above. The heating capacities in these units range from 12,000 to 50,000 Btu/hour with an efficiency of 3.4 COP and above. The gymnasium is conditioned by a single rooftop geothermal unit coupled with a SEMCO energy recovery wheel unit. The rooftop is rated for 20 tons of cooling and 180,000 Btu/hour of heating with efficiencies of 14 EER and 3.4 COP. The SEMCO unit provides pre-conditioned air to the rooftop unit by recovering energy from treated air that is exhausted from the space. Geothermal loop water is circulated via a single pair of constant volume distribution pumps rated at 10 horsepower each with a flow rate of 150 gallons per minute at 125 foot of head pressure.

Exhaust System

General and toilet exhaust air is removed through roof mounted exhaust fans manufactured by Penn Ventilator. These units are switch controlled located in the Building and Grounds Office. Some of the personal bathrooms contain in room exhaust fans that are light switch controlled. The kitchen hood has a single large up blast exhaust fan that is controlled by the disconnect switch. The kitchen hood has no make-up system and the fan only operates when cooking is occurring.

HVAC System Controls The school consists of two control systems, one being an antiquated pneumatic system with occupied and unoccupied mode based on a Honeywell time-clock panel, and newer Siemens Apogee direct digital control system. The pneumatic system operates the HVAC equipment located in the 1955 and 1975 wings of the building. Each classroom unit ventilator has a pneumatic control valve and room thermostat; however the thermostat provided limited control. The 1995 and 2004 wing HVAC systems are controlled by the Siemens Apogee DDC system. The control system has a graphical user interface that allows global control of the units from a single networked computer. The system has occupied and unoccupied scheduling capability for each wing. The steam boiler fires based on outside air temperature and modulates based on the steam pressure reading in the system. The boiler will generate steam at 7 PSI and once system pressure reduces to 3 PSI the boiler will fire again until the pressure rises back to 7 PSI.

Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water is supplied to the 1955 wing with a single Bock oil-fired hot water heater with a 32 gallon storage tank. The 1975 and 1995 wing is supplied domestic hot water with a Bradford and White Hydrojet electric heater rated at 18 kilowatts and 119 gallons of storage. The 2004 wing is supplied domestic hot from an Addyson water to water geothermal heat pump



coupled with an A.O. Smith 80 gallon storage tank. Each storage tank maintains a domestic water temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Kitchen Equipment The kitchen is equipped with a cooking hood that has propane-fired cooking equipment underneath which includes a Vulcan ten burner combination dual oven, electric warmer, and Blodgett convection oven. There also one propane fired warming station in the food line. The kitchen also has five reach in style commercial refrigerators and freezers. There is a single Hobart Dishwasher door type coupled with an electric booster heater both of these pieces of equipment are no longer in service.

Lighting A space by space breakdown of the lighting throughout the facility is provided in the Investment Grade Lighting Appendix.



VI. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix.

Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.



VII. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade – Interior Description: The lighting throughout the Estell Manor School is comprised of fluorescent fixtures with standard T8 lamps and electronic ballasts, and some T12 lamps with magnetic ballasts. Fixtures within the building vary from 2 to 4 lamps in most instances and are a mix of recessed and surface mounted style fixtures. There are also many incandescent and compact fluorescent (CFL) medium base style lamps used for general lighting. This ECM includes fixture retrofits for replacement of CFL lamps and incandescent screw in lamps to equivalent LED fixtures and lamps. Energy Savings Calculations: A detailed Investment Grade Lighting Audit can be found in Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix that outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods.

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 1.0Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 3,549

Electric Cost Savings ($) $550

LIGHTING UPGRADE SAVINGS SUMMARY



Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $1,025

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $200

Net Installation Cost ($): $825

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $550

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $550

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 10

Simple Payback 1.5

Simple Lifetime ROI 566.7%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $5,500

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 66%

Net Present Value (NPV) $3,866.61

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY



ECM #2: Lighting Upgrade – T8 to LED Description: The lighting throughout the Estell Manor School is comprised of fluorescent fixtures with standard T8 lamps and electronic ballasts, and some T12 lamps with magnetic ballasts. Fixtures within the building vary from 2 to 4 lamps in most instances and are a mix of recessed and surface mounted style fixtures. This ECM recommends replacing the existing fluorescent fixtures with new LED 1x4, 2x4, and 2x2 style recessed and or surface mounted fixtures through the hallways, offices, classrooms, and restrooms. Currently this measure recommends a one for one replacement strategy in each space; however the school should consult a professional engineer to perform light level calculations in each space as part of the replacement strategy. This may result in a reduction in fixture quantities that could further increase energy savings. Energy Savings Calculations: A detailed Investment Grade Lighting Audit can be found in Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix that outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods. Maintenance savings for this ECM have been estimated based on the cost to replace lamps and ballasts over time on an annual basis compared to the LED fixtures. Note when selecting LED fixtures they must be Design Lights Consortium (DLC) qualified in order to receive a NJ Smart Start incentive.


Electric Cost Savings ($) $4,008






NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $24,750

Net Installation Cost ($): $103,250

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $1,000

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $4,008

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $5,008


Simple Payback 20.6

Simple Lifetime ROI -51.5%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $10,000


Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -11%

Net Present Value (NPV) ($60,530.74)




ECM #3: Lighting Upgrade – Exterior Lighting Description: The exterior lighting at the Estell Manor School is currently lit by various high pressure sodium and metal halide fixtures. The exterior would be better served with more efficient LED lighting system. Concord Engineering recommends upgrading the lighting to an energy-efficient LED lighting system that includes LED lamps for the existing high pressure sodium and metal halide fixtures on the exterior. Energy Savings Calculations: A detailed Investment Grade Lighting Audit can be found in Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix that outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods.












Simple Payback 5.8









ECM #4: Lighting Controls Upgrade – Occupancy Sensors Description: Some of the lights in the Estell Manor School are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors. This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for classrooms, restrooms, hallways, and offices. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:

kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy

kWh

$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.



Rebates and Incentives:

From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: SmartStartIncentive

#Wallmountsensors $20persensor#Ceilingmountsensors $35persensor




LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS SUMMARY








Simple Payback 7.5









ECM #5: Refrigerator Replacement

Description: There are residential style refrigerators located in the Conference Room, Nurses Office, and Building and Grounds Office. These units are older models that are not nearly as energy efficient as one manufactured today. The proposed replacements are one-for-one with a unit of similar size and dimensions that has the most up-to-date Energy Star Rating. The models selected are manufactured by Frigidaire. Energy Savings Calculations:

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Quantity 3 3

Manufacturer Summit Frigidaire

Type Single Door Single Door

Model Varies FFPH44M4LB

Size (Cu-Ft) 4; 6 4.4

Per Unit Electric Usage (kWh) 422 289 133

Electric Rate ($/kWh) $0.155 $0.155

Electric Usage (kWh) 1,266 867 399

Energy Cost ($) $196 $134 $62COMMENTS:

ENERGY STAR REFRIGERATOR CALCULATION

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Calculations based Energy Star Website http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=refrig.calculator




Installation Cost ($): $780







Simple Payback 12.6



Simple Lifetime Savings $620


Net Present Value (NPV) ($251.13)




ECM #6: CRT Monitor Replacement Description: The Estell Manor School still utilizes CRT Monitors for use by its students. Typical CRT monitors throughout the building consist of 15 inch displays. These computer monitors are outdated and have several disadvantages such as; significantly higher energy consumption in operating and idle mode, use a large amount of desk space, poor picture quality, distortions and flickering image, secular glare problems, and high weight, and electromagnetic emissions. Many of the drawbacks are difficult to quantify except for the energy use. CRT monitors use considerably more energy than an alternative flat panel LCD/LED monitor. Replacement of the existing CRT monitors with LCD/LED monitors saves considerable energy as well as provides other ergonomic benefits as well. This ECM will replace all remaining three (3) existing CRT monitors with new 17” Dell LCD/LED. It is expected District IT Staff will purchase and install new monitors, therefore no labor costs were taken into account for this measure. Energy Savings Calculations: Savings calculations were based on operating occupied hours per week of operating staff and students, and estimated idle time of monitors per week outside occupied hours. Power consumption data is based on actual monitor characteristics for a Dell CRT, and Dell LCD/LED. EnergySavings Quantity OperatingHours P Quantity IdleHours P Qty = Quantity

Op Hrs = Operating Hours per Year

Idle Hrs = Idle Hours per Year

PO = Operating Power Consumption Watts

PI = Idle Power Consumption Watts



ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS 15" CRT 17" LCD

# of Monitors 3 3

Power Cons. (W) 71 18 53

Idle Power Cons. (W) 5 0.5 4.5

Operating Hrs per Week 33 33

Operating Weeks per Yr 41 41

Idle Hrs per Week 136 136

Idle Weeks per Yr 41 41

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.155 0.155

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Demand (kW) 0.213 0.054 0.159

Electric Usage (kWh) 367 80 287

Energy Cost ($) $57 $12 $44

COMMENTS:

CRT MONITOR REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS


Savings Based on Dell 15: CRT Monitor Compared with Dell 17" LCD/LED




Installation Cost ($): $375







Simple Payback 8.5


Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0

Simple Lifetime Savings $440


Net Present Value (NPV) $0.33




ECM #7: Computer Power Management Description: The School currently has approximately 70 desktop computers throughout the classrooms, offices, and computer labs. Currently these computers are on all day during the week and shut down on weekends, during summer recess, and on long holidays. While the current operating procedure has its merits, by implementing a management program with power management and maintenance management while the buildings are unoccupied as well as designating on periods for software upgrades, and wake on LAN capability to boot computers up prior to student arrival significant energy savings could be achieved. This ECM recommends installing a computer maintenance management program with a power management option to turn computer on and off without the need for manual shutdowns by staff. The system being considered should be equivalent to a Dell KACE K1000. This will not only save the School on energy costs, but also benefit IT maintenance. Energy Savings Calculations: Savings calculations were based on existing operating conditions observed in the field, in addition to the quantity, make, and model of desktop. Idle and off power information was obtained from Energy Star’s version 5.0 Program Requirements for Computers. EnergyUsage IdlePowerWatts OnHours OffPowerWatts OffHours




ECM INPUTSEstell Manor

SchoolEstell Manor

School

Quantity of Desktops 70 70

Idle Power Cons. (W) 80 80

Off Power Cons. (W) 2 2

Normal Operating ON Hours 4,032 2,160

Holiday Operating ON Hours 96 0

Summer Operating ON Hours 0 0

Normal Operating OFF Hours 2,033 3,905

Holiday Operating OFF Hours 544 640

Summer Operating OFF Hours 2,055 2,055

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.155 0.155


Electric Usage (kWh) 23,764 13,020 10,744

Energy Cost ($) $3,683 $2,018 $1,665

COMMENTS:

COMPUTER POWER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS


Idle and Off Power Draws based on Energy Star Rating for Desktop Computers











Simple Payback 6.0









ECM #8: De-stratification Fans Description: The Gymnasium at the Estell Manor School is heated and cooled through a single geothermal rooftop unit coupled with a heat recovery unit. In rooms with high ceilings typically stratification of heated air occurs, resulting in air at ceiling level being warmer than the floor. Since temperature at the floor level dictates the comfort of occupants and is typically the location of the thermostat controlling the system, this results in additional operating hours to satisfy space conditions. This ECM would install two Airius Model A25 de-stratification fans in the gymnasium to be suspended from the ceiling, with all require electrical wiring and supports. These fans should only operate during heating season to help maintain a higher floor temperature and reduce cycling time. Energy Savings Calculations: The calculations are based on the manufacturer’s percent savings utilizing the height of the ceiling and associated temperature differential between floor and ceiling. The temperature differential in this case was estimated at 12.6 degrees Fahrenheit. HeatingEnergy kBtu 80%OversizeFactor SpaceHeatingCapacity HDD

Adj. Factor 24 ∆

Savings kBtu HeatingEnergy PercentSavings

FanPowerPenalty kWh FanPower W WinterOperatingHours1kWh1,000W




Description Existing Gym Conditions

Proposed Gym w/ Fans

Space Heating Type Geothermal Geothermal

Space Heating Capacity (MBH) 180 180

Heating Efficiency (COP) 3.4 3.4

Heating Degree Days (65 F) 4025 4025

Degree Day Adjustment Factor 0.55 0.55

Space Ceiling Height (ft) 25 25

Ceiling-Floor T (oF) 13 13

Percent Energy Savings - 22%

Destrat Fan Power (kWh) - 134

Heating Energy (kBtu) 43,273 33,753

Electric Rate ($/kWh) $0.155 $0.155Fuel Oil #2 ($/Gallon) $3.070 $3.070


Energy Cost ($) $1,966 $1,554 $412COMMENTS:

DESTRATIFICATION FAN ANALYSIS


Ceiling-Floor Temperature Differential Based on 0.5 F per Foot











Simple Payback 12.1





Net Present Value (NPV) ($81.57)




ECM #9: High Efficiency Transformers Description: Electrical distribution transformers play a key role in delivering electrical power to buildings as all the electrical power supplied to the building flows through them. Whether equipment is plugged in and turned on or not transformers continue to operate. Consider their impact on electricity consumption. Some transformers waste as much as 20% of billed electricity. Older transformers in existing buildings may not have been built to meet the load requirements of today. Over the years electrical distribution has changed very little, however the connected equipment has changed dramatically. This dramatic change is derived from both the type of equipment (mostly electronic in nature) and the density of installed equipment. The impact of this change has had a direct impact on power quality and transformer efficiency. When newer electronic equipment is introduced into buildings with older electrical systems power quality and transformer efficiency can suffer. According to a Department of Energy study performed in 1996 electronic equipment can increase losses by as much as 2.7 times. In real terms this would mean that a transformer that has a nameplate efficiency of 97% in reality is operating closer to 90% or lower. The difference represents additional costs to operate the transformer. Replacing your older transformers with Power smiths energy efficient E-Saver-C3 or T1000-C3 transformers can improve the reliability of your electronic equipment and significantly reduce electricity waste. Power smith’s energy efficient transformers have substantially lower losses (higher efficiency) than other transformers. These energy savings mean less kilowatt-hours (kWh) consumed and lower energy bills. Electricity demand charges also decline, thanks to reduced energy losses. These savings pay for the transformer many times over its installed life. The Estell Manor School has two GE 45 kVA, one GE 30 kVA, and one Sylvania 75 kVA rated dry type transformers located in electrical rooms. The GE transformers are nearly 10 years old and the Sylvania appears to be over 20 years old. This ECM would replace all four transformers with new Power Smith energy efficient units. Energy Savings Calculations: See Appendix for Manufacturers Transformer Calculation Spreadsheet.



TRANSFORMER SAVINGS SUMMARY











Simple Payback 11.7





Net Present Value (NPV) $478.34




ECM #10 – Fuel Conversion to Natural Gas Description: The Estell Manor School currently does not have natural gas service to the building. The gas company is currently investigating the potential for extension of natural gas utility services on Cape May Avenue. In the event gas utility service becomes available it is recommended the school convert to natural gas. While the conversion of existing equipment over to natural gas may not save energy, it will reduce energy costs. This ECM would require extension of utility services to the building when gas is available on the street. (Note typically the utility company may cover the cost to bring gas from the street to the building depending on the length of pipe.) The school will need to switch the existing steam boiler over to natural gas from oil, and should convert the existing propane fired kitchen equipment over to natural gas fired equipment. This will require new gas distribution pipe to be installed from the utility meter to each converted appliance. Energy Savings Calculations:

FuelUsage kbtu FuelUsage Units FuelConversionFactorBtuUnit

NaturalGasUsage therm FuelUsage kBtu1therm100kBtu




Description Fuel Oil & Propane

Natural Gas Conversion

Existing Fuel Oil Usage (Gallons) 3,290 0

Existing Propane Usage (Gallons) 567 0

Fuel Oil Conversion (Btu/Gal) 139,000 139,000

Propane Conversion (Btu/Gal) 91,600 91,600

Natural Gas (Btu/therm) 100,000 100,000

Fuel Usage (kBtu) 509,220 509,220

Fuel Oil #2 ($/Gallon) $3.070 $3.070Propane ($/gal) $3.790 $3.790Natural Gas ($/therm) $1.000 $1.000

Fuel Oil #2 Usage (Gallons) 3,290 0 3,290

Propane Usage (Gallons) 567 0 567

Natural Gas Usage (Therm) 0 5,092 (5,092)

Energy Cost ($) $12,248 $5,092 $7,156COMMENTS:

FUEL CONVERSION ANALYSIS












Simple Payback 1.3









ECM #11 – Electric to Hot Water Heat Description: The 1975 wing has heating only unit ventilators with electric heating coils. There are a total of seven (7) unit ventilators in classrooms (#5, 6, 7, 8) and the cafeteria. While electric heating is efficient in terms of energy units converted to usable heat it is much more costly to operate on a $ per Btu of usable heat. By converting these units to hot water and utilizing the existing steam boiler and a new steam to hot water heat exchanger the units would be must more cost effective to operate compared to the electric. This ECM would involve using the existing steam boiler and installing a heat exchanger to generate heating hot water from the steam. New unit ventilators would need to be installed with hot water heating coils along with all necessary controls and supply & return piping from the boiler room to each unit. Energy Savings Calculations: HeatingEnergyUsage

Capacity 80%OversizeFactor HDD 65F

AdjustmentFactor 0.55 24Hoursday

1

Design∆T

1FuelConversion

1Efficiency

Pump Energy Penalty:

Estimated Pump Power required: ½ HP

Hours of Operation: 4,368

Pump Electric Usage (kWh): 1,379



Note: If the District is able to convert to Natural Gas the adjusted Savings are as follows: Natural Gas: 2,826 Therms (Additional Usage) Energy Cost Savings: $7,603 (with Cost of Natural Gas at $1 / therm)


Description Unit Ventilator Electric Heat

Unit Ventilator Hot Water Heat

Quantity of Units 7 7

Electric Heat Element Size (kW) 12 -

Hot Water Coil Size (MBH) - 40

Heating Degree Days (65 F) 4025 4025

Degree Day Adjustment Factor 0.55 0.55

System Efficiency 100% 81%

Fuel Conversion (Btu/Unit) 3,412 139,000

Electric Rate ($/kWh) $0.155 $0.155Fuel Oil #2 ($/Gallon) $3.070 $3.070


Fuel Oil #2 Usage (Gallons) 0 2,033 (2,033)

Energy Cost ($) $10,642 $6,454 $4,188

COMMENTS:

ELECTRIC TO HOT WATER HEAT CONVERSION


Based on Converting 1975 Addition Electric Heat only UV's less Classroom #10 with the HP











Simple Payback 45.4









ECM #12: Heat Pump Rooftop Units Description: The 1995 section three rooftop heat pump units are at the end of their useful life expectancy. In the installation of new rooftop units would not only yield energy savings based on one for one efficiency increases, but also reduce the demand on maintenance personnel compared to the existing equipment. This ECM would replace the existing three (3) rooftop units with new heat pump roof top units with backup electric heat and economizer controls. The Trane WSC series were the basis of design for this ECM. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. Energy Savings Calculations: Heating Usage

Usage kBtu Capacity 0.8 24hrs HDD1

65 15 F

FuelUsage Usage kBtu%

FuelConversionFactor

HeatPumpUsage kWh

CapacityBtuh

0.8 24hrs HDD 1

65 15 F

1

13412

HDD for Heat Pump Usage is calculation based on operation between 40 to 65 degrees Fahrenheit. Heating operation below 40 degrees Fahrenheit is performed by electric backup. Heating Degree Days were adjusted for use type. Cooling Usage

1000

1



RHP-1



Unit Cooling Capacity (Btu/h) 75,000 75,000

Unit Electric Heating Capacity (kW) 18.0 18.0

Unit Capacity (Btu/h) 71,000 71,000

Coefficient of Performance (COP) 3.00 3.50

Heating Degree Days (65 F) 2,560 2,560

Percent HDD less than 40 F 17% 17%

Percent HDD between 40 F to 65 F 83% 83%

Heating Stage 1 [Heat Pump] (kWh) 5,548 4,755

Heating Stage 2 [Electric Backup] (kWh) 2,953 2,953

Electric Usage (kWh) 8,501 7,708 793

Cooling Efficiency (EER) 9 11.4

Cooling Equivalent Full Load Hours 1,131 1,131


Electric Cost ($/kWh) $0.1550 $0.1550




Energy Cost ($) $2,778 $2,348 $430

COMMENTS:

ROOFTOP HEATPUMP REPLACEMENT

HEATING SAVINGS CALCULATION

COOLING SAVINGS CALCULATION


HP Operation Above 40F for Heating, Below 40 F for Backup Electric Heat. HDD Adjusted for Use Type



RHP-2











Heating Stage 2 [Electric Backup] (kWh) 984 984


Cooling Efficiency (EER) 9 11







Energy Cost ($) $1,290 $1,111 $179

COMMENTS:








RHP-3











Heating Stage 2 [Electric Backup] (kWh) 1,969 1,969









Energy Cost ($) $2,176 $1,755 $421

COMMENTS:
















Simple Payback 66.0









ECM #13: Heat Pump RTU to Natural Gas Description: The 1995 section three rooftop heat pump units are at the end of their useful life expectancy. By converting these units to natural gas the school will realize energy and cost savings. The school will also see improved heating performance of the Gas rooftop units during lower temperatures. This ECM would replace the existing three (3) rooftop units with new gas-fired roof top units with DX cooling and economizer controls. The Trane YHC series were the basis of design for this ECM. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. This ECM is also predicated on natural gas being available to the building. Energy Savings Calculations: Heating Usage


65 15 F



HeatPumpUsage kWh

CapacityBtuh

0.8 24hrs HDD 1

65 15 F

1

13412


1000

1



RHP-1






Coefficient of Performance (COP) 3.00 -




Heating Stage 1 [Heat Pump] (kWh) 5,548 -

Heating Stage 2 [Electric Backup] (kWh) 2,953 -

Electric Usage (kWh) 8,501 -




Electric Cost ($/kWh) $0.1550 $0.1550 Natural Gas Cost ($/therm) $1.0000 $1.0000




Natural Gas Usage (themr) 0 1,130 -1,130

Energy Cost ($) $2,778 $2,173 $605

COMMENTS:

CONVERT ROOFTOP HEAT PUMP TO GAS UNIT




HP Operation Above 40F for Heating, Below 40 F for Backup Electric Heat. HDD Adjusted for Use Type. Savings calculated based on equivalent capacity



RHP-2











Heating Stage 2 [Electric Backup] (kWh) 984 -









Natural Gas Usage (themr) 0 542 -542

Energy Cost ($) $1,290 $1,039 $251

COMMENTS:








RHP-3











Heating Stage 2 [Electric Backup] (kWh) 1,969 -









Natural Gas Usage (themr) 0 881 -881

Energy Cost ($) $2,176 $1,700 $477

COMMENTS:
















Simple Payback 55.4









ECM #14 – Air to Air Heat Pump to Geothermal Description: The 1995 wing currently has heat pump unit ventilators that condition the five classrooms. The units are currently air to air heat pumps with 3.5 tons of cooling and 13 kilowatt electric back up heating coils. When the 2004 addition was constructed additional piping from the geothermal system was run down the main corridor for the future potential to feed these units. While the distribution piping is present the well field would need to be expanded to meet the capacity requirements of the added equipment. This ECM would install new Daikin-McQuay geothermal unit ventilator style units in place of the existing heat pump unit ventilators. The condenser water piping would need to be extended from the hallway to the units in the classrooms. New geothermal wells will need to be added to the existing well field to supply enough capacity. Energy Savings Calculations: Heating Usage


65 15 F



HeatPumpUsage kWh

CapacityBtuh

0.8 24hrs HDD 1

65 15 F

1

13412


1000

1










Percent HDD less than 40 F 17% -

Percent HDD between 40 F to 65 F 83% -


Heating Stage 2 [Electric Backup] (kWh) 10,910


Cooling Efficiency (EER) 8.2 16.7







Energy Cost ($) $9,035 $5,071 $3,964

COMMENTS:

CONVERT AIR TO AIR HEAT PUMP TO GEOTHERMAL















Simple Payback 49.2




Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -





ECM #15: Kitchen Equipment Gas Conversion Description: The school is equipped with propane fired cooking equipment. In the kitchen are a ten burner range combination oven, and one half rack convection oven. By converting over to Energy Star Rated propane fired cooking equipment significant energy and cost savings could be realized. This ECM would replace the existing equipment with new propane fired Energy Star rated kitchen equipment. This measure also recommends downsizing the range oven combination unit from a 10 burner to a smaller 6 burner unit as based on the bills appears to be oversized. It is recommended the school consult with a kitchen consultant prior to purchasing equipment to assist in specifying the most efficiency kitchen. Energy Savings Calculations: Energy savings were calculated based on NJ BPU Protocols to Measure Resource Savings with adjustments made based on operating assumptions for a school kitchen. Fryer, Griddle, & Ovens Equation:

EnergyUsageDaysYearEnergyFood

Btulb

1Efficiency

IdleEnergyRateBtuhr

Hoursday

ProductionCapacity

1

FuelConversion

Combination Oven & Range:

EnergyUsage QtyofUnits DaysYear

Op. Hrs IdleHrs QtyBurners EnergyRate BurnerUseRate%

IdleHours QtyPilots IdleEnergyRate Op.Hrs IdleHrs

OvenQty EnergyRate1

Efficiency

1FuelConversion





Operating Days per Year 180 180

Operating Hours per Day 1 1

Idle Operating Hours per Day 0 0

Quantity of Burners 10 6

Burner Energy Rate (Btu/h) 30,000.0 28,000.0

Burner Idle Energy Rate (Btu/h) 600.0 560.0

Underneath Oven Quantity 2.0 1.0

Oven Energy Rate (Btu/h) 29,000.0 35,000.0

Fuel Source Propane Propane

Fuel Conversion Factor 91,600 91,600

Burner Use Rate 20% 33%

Oven Heavy Load Efficiency 35% 44%

Propane Cost ($/gallon) $3.790 $3.790


Energy Cost ($) $1,681 $1,005 $676

COMMENTS:

COMBINATION RANGE EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS


2% Pilot Light Energy Consumption, 1 Pilot Light per 2 Burners



Total Propane Savings: 220 gallons Total Cost Savings: $833



Type of Oven Convection Convection

Operating Days per Year 180 180

Operating Hours per Day 1 1

Average Production per Day (lbs) 80 80

Production Capacity (lb/hr) 70.0 70.0

Fuel Source Propane Propane

Fuel Conversion Factor 91,600 91,600

Heavy Load Efficiency 30% 44%

Idle Energy Rate (Btu/hr) 18,000.0 13,000.0

Propane Cost ($/gallon) $3.790 $3.790


Energy Cost ($) $495 $338 $158

COMMENTS:

OVEN EQUIPMENT ANALYSIS












Simple Payback 16.8









VIII. RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES Globally, renewable energy has become a priority affecting international and domestic energy policy. The State of New Jersey has taken a proactive approach, and has recently adopted in its Energy Master Plan a goal of 30% renewable energy by 2020. To help reach this goal New Jersey created the Office of Clean Energy under the direction of the Board of Public Utilities and instituted a Renewable Energy Incentive Program to provide additional funding to private and public entities for installing qualified renewable technologies. A renewable energy source can greatly reduce a building’s operating expenses while producing clean environmentally friendly energy. Concord Engineering has assessed the feasibility of installing renewable energy measures (REM) for the municipality utilizing renewable technologies and concluded that there is potential for solar energy generation. Solar Generation Solar energy produces clean energy and reduces a building’s carbon footprint. This is accomplished via photovoltaic panels which are mounted on all south and southwestern facades of the building. Flat roof, as well as sloped areas can be utilized; flat areas will have the panels turned to an optimum solar absorbing angle. (A structural survey of the roof would be necessary before the installation of PV panels is considered). Parking lots can also be utilized for the installation of a solar array. A truss system can be installed that is high enough to park vehicles under the array and no parking lot area is lost. The state of NJ has instituted a program in which one Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) is given to the Owner for every 1000 kWh of generation. SREC’s can be sold anytime on the market at their current market value. The value of the credit varies upon the current need of the power companies. The average value per credit used in our financial calculations is $191 per MWH. This equates to $0.191 per kWh generated. CEG has reviewed the existing roof, ground, and parking lot area potential of the facility being audited for the purposes of determining a potential for a photovoltaic system. The facility was evaluated for the most economical and feasible areas for the installation of a solar array, which included a roof mounted array. In lieu of a roof mount array the district could consider ground mount as an alternative option, it would require an area approximately 130’x100’ for an equivalent system and additional tree clearing around the system to reduce shading. The ground array was not fully vetted as fields currently occupy most of the cleared land space known to be owned by the district, however the district should consider either option if they wish to pursue solar. A depiction of the area utilized at the facility is shown in Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. Note this analysis did not include a structural evaluation to determine if the roof could accommodate the additional loading, which would be required to be performed prior to implementation. The total KWH production for the system is 115,836 kWh annually, reducing the overall utility bill for the school by approximately 20% percent. A detailed financial analysis can be found in the Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. This analysis illustrates the payback of the system over a 15 year period. The eventual degradation of the solar panels and the price of accumulated SREC’s are factored into the payback.



The proposed photovoltaic array layout is designed based on the specifications for the Sharp Model ND-240QCJ panel. This panel has a “DC” rated full load output of 240 watts, and has a total panel conversion efficiency of 14.4%. Although panels rated at higher wattages are available through Sharp and other various manufacturers, in general most manufacturers who produce commercially available solar panels produce a similar panel in the 200 to 250 watt range. This provides more manufacturer options to the public entity if they wish to pursue the proposed solar recommendation without losing significant system capacity. The array system capacity was sized based on available roof space, ground area, or parking canopy style system area available at the existing facility. Estimated solar array generation is calculated based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1.0 Calculator. In order to calculate the array generation an appropriate location with solar data on file must be selected. In addition the system DC rated kilowatt (kW) capacity must be inputted, a DC to AC de-rate factor, panel tilt angle, and array azimuth angle. The DC to AC de-rate factor is based on the panel nameplate DC rating, inverter and transformer efficiencies (95%), mismatch factor (98%), diodes and connections (100%), dc and ac wiring(98%, 99%), soiling, (95%), system availability (95%), shading (if applicable), and age(new/100%). The overall DC to AC de-rate factor has been calculated at an overall rating of 81%. The PVWatts Calculator program then calculates estimated system generation based on average monthly solar irradiance and user provided inputs. The monthly energy generation and offset electric costs from the PVWatts calculator is shown in the Renewable/Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. The proposed solar array for the facility is qualified by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Net Metering Guidelines as a Class I Renewable Energy Source. These guidelines allow onsite customer generation using renewable energy sources such as solar and wind with a capacity of 2 megawatts (MW) or less. This limits a customer system design capacity to being a net user and not a net generator of electricity on an annual basis. Although these guidelines state that if a customer does net generate (produce more electricity than they use), the customer will be credited those kilowatt-hours generated to be carried over for future usage on a month to month basis. Then, on an annual basis if the customer is a net generator the customer will then be compensated by the utility the average annual PJM Grid LMP price per kilowatt-hour for the over generation. Due to the aforementioned legislation, the customer is at limited risk if they generate more than they use at times throughout the year. With the inefficiency of today’s energy storage systems, such as batteries, the added cost of storage systems is not warranted and was not considered in the proposed design. Direct purchase involves the District paying for 100% of the total project cost upfront in lieu of one of the methods noted in the Installation Funding Options section below. Calculations include a utility inflation rate as well as the degradation of the solar panels over time. The financial summary for the facility is as follows:



Concord Engineering recommends the District review all options available for installation of solar PV systems at their facility including a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). This option utilizes providers who will own, operate, and maintain the system for a period of 15 years. During this time the PPA Provider would sell all of the electric generated by Solar Array to the District at a reduced rate compared to their existing electric rate. It should be noted that current SREC pricing has significantly impacted the PPA market for public entities in addition to the end of the 30% grant in lieu of the investment tax credit. These recent market changes have made it more difficult for public entities to secure low cost power purchase price options.




Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $22,134




Simple Payback 10.6


Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $332,010


Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 4.7%


REM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY



Wind Generation In addition to evaluating solar, Concord also conducted a review of the applicability of wind energy for the District. Wind energy production is another option available as a clean renewable energy generating source. Wind turbines of various types can be utilized to produce clean energy on a per building basis. Cash incentives are available per kWh of electric generated. Concord investigated the potential for smaller building mountable wind turbines, and horizontal turbines to maximize the available free space. In order to be economically viable a site requires a minimum average wind speed of 6 meters per second (13.5 mph). Based on the obtained wind data shown in Figure 4 for Newark the annual average wind speed is 9.75 mph with a peak of 11.8 mph, making this area unattractive for wind development. Therefore, wind energy is not a viable option to implement.

Figure 4: Monthly Wind Speed (Estell Manor, New Jersey)



IX. ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY Load Profile: Load Profile analysis was performed to determine the seasonal energy usage of the facility. Irregularities in the load profile will indicate potential problems within the facility. Consequently based on the profile a recommendation will be made to remedy the irregularity in energy usage. For this report, the facility’s energy consumption data was gathered in table format and plotted in graph form to create the load profile. Refer to The Electric, Fuel Oil, and Propane Usage Profiles included within this report to reference the respective electricity, fuel oil, and propane usage load profiles. Electricity: The electricity usage profile demonstrates winter season dominated consumption load profile. The average summer (May-September) consumption is 36,798 kWh per month which is less than the average winter (October-April) consumption of 56,183 kWh per month. The historical usage profile is favorable as typically summer commodity rates are higher due to increased demand on the grid, while winter months see reduced grid demand. This profile is due to the reliance on electric heat throughout much of the facility. Natural Gas: The facility currently does not receive natural gas. Fuel Oil: The fuel oil profile demonstrates winter season dominated consumption load profile. Deliveries for oil occur regularly throughout the winter months, with little to no deliveries in the summer. The existing oil tank is approximately 500 gallons. Propane: The propane profile demonstrates a fairly constant load throughout the year except for July and August. The propane is currently used strictly for cooking needs at the school. The average consumption outside of July and August is 56 gallons per month. Tariff Analysis: Electricity: The facility receives electrical service from Atlantic City Electric (ACE) on rate schedules MGS (Monthly General Service). The facility has contracted a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to provide electric commodity service. First Energy has been contracted however; the contract particulars such as product structure, price, term and conditions were not available for review or comments.



For electric supply (generation) service, the client has a choice to either use ACE’s default service rate BGS or contract with a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to supply electricity. Each year since 2002, the four New Jersey Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs) - Public Service Gas & Electric Company (PSE&G), Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE), Jersey Central Power & Light Company (JCP&L), and Rockland Electric Company (RECO) - have procured several billion dollars of electric supply to serve their Basic Generation Service (BGS) customers through a statewide auction process held in February. BGS refers to the service of customers who are not served by a third party supplier or competitive retailer. This service is sometimes known as Standard Offer Service, Default Service, or Provider of Last Resort Service. The Auction Process has consisted of two auctions that are held concurrently, one for larger customers on an hourly price plan (BGS-CIEP) and one for smaller commercial and residential customers on a fixed-price plan (BGS-FP). This facility’s rate structure is based on the fixed-price plan (BGS-FP). The utility will continue to be responsible for maintaining the existing network of wires, pipes and poles that make up the delivery system, which will serve all consumers, regardless of whom they choose to purchase their electricity or natural gas from. ACE’s delivery service rate includes the following charges: Customer Service Charge, Distribution Charge (kWh and Demand), Societal Benefits Charge (SBC), and Securitization Transition Charge. Fuel Oil & Propane: Fuel Oil and Propane pricing contract particulars were not provided, however it appears the facility is on a day of delivery price schedule.

Electric Commodities Market Overview:

Current electricity market pricing has remained relatively stable over the last couple of years. Commodity pricing in 2008 marked historical highs in electricity commodity. Commodity pricing commencing spring of 2009 continuing through 2013, has decreased dramatically over 2008 historic highs and continues to be favorable for locking in long term (2-5 year) contracts with 3rd Party Supplier’s for electricity supply requirements.

It is important to note that electric commodity market prices are moved by supply and demand, political conditions, market technicals and trader sentiment. This market is continuously changing. Energy commodity pricing is also correlated to weather forecasts. Because weather forecasts are dependable only in the short-term, prolonged temperature extremes can really cause extreme price swings.



Short Term Energy Outlook - US Energy Information Administration (August 6, 2013):

Electricity

The Northeastern United States experienced a strong heat wave during mid-July. In response, many customers ran their air conditioners more than usual. EIA estimates the average residential customer in New England will use about 1.0 percent more electricity during the summer of 2013 (June-August) compared with last summer, while customers in the Middle Atlantic states are expected to use about 0.5 percent less electricity. In addition to increased electricity demand, the heat wave also caused temporary spikes in wholesale power prices. State retail rate regulations shield many residential customers from price swings in the wholesale power market, but EIA expects summer electricity prices in the Northeast to average about 2.7 percent higher than summer 2012, primarily as a result of higher fuel costs paid by generators.

Generation fuel costs and wholesale electricity prices have increased this year after a considerable decline in 2012. During the first half of 2013, EIA estimates the price of natural gas delivered to electric generators averaged $4.46 per MMBtu, 44 percent higher than the same period last year. Changes in the costs of providing electricity are not immediately reflected on retail customer bills because state regulatory commissions must approve rate changes in many areas of the country. EIA expects the residential retail price of electricity in 2013 will average 12.1 cents per kilowatthour, about 1.9 percent higher than the price last year.



The below recommendations presented by Concord Engineering are based on current information provided by the District for their facility’s historical energy usage. Any savings presented with these recommendations are estimates only based on that information. It is recommended that further analysis and review of more recent utility data and actual TPS electricity and natural gas supply contracts and historical billings be performed prior to performing any of the presented recommendations. Recommendations:

1. Concord recommends the District continue its aggregation approach for 3rd party commodity supply procurement strategies for the purchase of electricity.

2. After review of the utility consumption report and current commodity pricing outlook, Concord recommends that the District utilize the advisement of a 3rd party unbiased Energy Consulting Firm licensed by the State of New Jersey Board of Public Utilities that is experienced in the procurement of commodities, New Jersey procurement laws, aggregation of facilities and energy supply risk and commodity management. This firm should be able to provide full service advisement over the term of the contract, provide market watch opportunities and identify any additional opportunities that may further reduce costs. Many of these opportunities may include: energy rates; utility bill auditing; energy data analytics; and efficiency improvements. It is important that a rational, defensible strategy for purchasing commodity in volatile markets is incorporated. Examples include:

Budgets that reflect sound market intelligence An understanding of utility and market historical prices and trends Awareness of seasonal opportunities (e.g. shoulder months) Negotiation of fair contractual terms An aggressive, market based price

3. Concord recommends that the District review their current situation regarding third party

purchasing for their facility. The District should review their current contract particulars and future pricing to formulate a strategy to optimize cost savings.

4. Concord also recommends that the District consider utilizing a third party utility billing-auditing service to further analyze historical utility invoices such as water, sewer, natural gas, electricity and solar for incorrect billings and rate tariff optimization services. This service can be based on a shared savings model with no direct cost. The service could provide refunds on potential incorrect billings that may have been passed through by the utilities and paid by the District.



5. Concord recommends the District get in contact with their Atlantic City Electric Account Representative to discuss the potential of switching the main school account (#0219 4119 9990) rate structure over from Monthly General Service to Annual General Service. Given the fairly constant facility load and demand over 100 kilowatts, by switching to Annual Service could see a reduction in costs on their delivery portion of the bill. This will require the school to contact Atlantic City Electric and discussion changing from their current rate classification to a new one, along with the potential cost savings. The following are estimated savings based on Concords review of the delivery costs associated with each rate structure and using the schools previous years usage applied to the most recent published rate tariff.

UTILITY RATE SCHEDULEEFFECTIVE

DATEANNUAL

RATE COSTACE Monthly General Service - Secondary Jan-14 $45,653ACE Annual General Service - Secondary Jan-14 $32,235

$13,418Notes: Rate Costs do not include cost of Electric Supply through 3rd party.

UTILITY TARIFF CHANGE ANALYSIS

Tariff Change Annual Savings:



X. INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS CEG has reviewed various funding options for the facility owner to utilize in subsidizing the costs for installing the energy conservation measures noted within this report. Below are a few alternative funding methods:

A. Incentive Programs: Pay For Performance The New Jersey Smart Start Pay for Performance program includes incentives based on savings resulted from implemented ECMs. The program is available for all buildings that were audited as part of the NJ Clean Energy’s Local Government Energy Audit Program. The facility’s participation in the program is assisted by an approved program partner. An “Energy Reduction Plan” is created with the facility and approved partner to shown at least 15% reduction in the building’s current energy use. Multiple energy conservation measures implemented together are applicable toward the total savings of at least 15%. No more than 50% of the total energy savings can result from lighting upgrades / changes.

Total incentive is capped at 50% of the project cost. The program savings is broken down into three benchmarks; Energy Reduction Plan, Project Implementation, and Measurement and Verification. Each step provides additional incentives as the energy reduction project continues. The benchmark incentives are as follows:

1. Energy Reduction Plan – Upon completion of an energy reduction plan by an approved program partner, the incentive will grant $0.10 per square foot between $5,000 and $50,000, and not to exceed 50% of the facility’s annual energy expense. (Benchmark #1 is not provided in addition to the local government energy audit program incentive.)

2. Project Implementation – Upon installation of the recommended measures along with the “Substantial Completion Construction Report,” the incentive will grant savings per KWH or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum saving must be 15%. (Example $0.11 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.12/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $1.10 / Therm for 15% savings, $1.20 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from projected savings above 15%.

3. Measurement and Verification – Upon verification 12 months after implementation of all recommended measures, that actual savings have been achieved, based on a completed verification report, the incentive will grant additional savings per kWh or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum savings must be 15%. (Example $0.07 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.08/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $0.70 / Therm for 15% savings, $0.80 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from verified savings above 15%.



Direct Install Program The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Direct Install Program is a state funded program that targets small commercial and industrial facilities with peak demand of less than 150 kW. This turnkey program is aimed at providing owners a seamless, comprehensive process for analysis, equipment replacement and financial incentives to reduce consumption, lower utility costs and improve profitability. The program covers up to 70% of the cost for eligible upgrades including lighting, lighting controls, refrigeration, HVAC, motors, variable speed drives, natural gas and food service. Participating contractors (refer to www.njcleanenergy.com) conduct energy assessments in addition to your standard local government energy audit and install the cost-effective measures. Smart Start Program

Prescriptive Measures - The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Smart Start prescriptive measures incentives include unit pricing incentives for installation of energy efficient equipment and controls. Proposed equipment and controls must meet the minimum efficiency requirements as well as other application requirements. The Smart Start prescriptive incentives applicable for new construction, renovations, remodeling and equipment replacements, for a wide range of equipment including:

Electric Chillers Gas Cooling Electric Unitary HVAC Ground Source Heat Pumps Gas Heating Variable Frequency Drives Gas Water Heating Premium Motors Prescriptive Lighting Lighting Controls Technical Studies

Custom Measures - The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Smart Start prescriptive measures incentives include all measures not identified in the prescriptive measures category or measures that must have savings verified through additional analysis such as energy model simulations. Custom measures are intended to include savings as a result of unique energy efficiency measures, which are typically facility specific such as waste heat recovery. Custom incentives are provided based on the amount of energy saved and minimum internal rate of return in order to be eligible.

CEG recommends the Owner review the use of the above-listed funding options in addition to utilizing their standard method of financing for facilities upgrades in order to fund the proposed energy conservation measures.



B. Financing Options: Municipal Bonds Municipal bonds are a bond issued by a city or other local government, or their agencies. Potential issuers of municipal bonds include cities, counties, redevelopment agencies, school districts, publicly owned airports and seaports, and any other governmental entity (or group of governments) below the state level. Municipal bonds may be general obligations of the issuer or secured by specified revenues. Interest income received by holders of municipal bonds is often exempt from the federal income tax and from the income tax of the state in which they are issued, although municipal bonds issued for certain purposes may not be tax exempt. Power Purchase Agreement Public Law 2008, Chapter 3 authorizes contracts of up to fifteen (15) years for energy purchase contracts commonly known as “power purchase agreements.” These are programs where the contracting unit (Owner) procures a contract for, in most cases, a third party to install, maintain, and own a renewable energy system. These renewable energy systems are typically solar panels, windmills or other systems that create renewable energy. In exchange for the third party’s work of installing, maintaining and owning the renewable energy system, the contracting unit (Owner) agrees to purchase the power generated by the renewable energy system from the third party at agreed upon energy rates. Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP): Public Law 2009, Chapter 4 authorizes government entities to make energy related improvements to their facilities and pay for the costs using the value of energy savings that result from the improvements. The “Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP)” law provides a flexible approach that can allow all government agencies in New Jersey to improve and reduce energy usage with minimal expenditure of new financial resources. This program provides public entities to make valuable facility infrastructure improvements that are associated with energy savings. All energy savings projects are eligible as long as the financing period does not extend beyond 15 years. The financing can be utilized for all aspects of energy efficiency project implementation including, energy savings plan development, engineering, construction management, construction management, commissioning, and measurement and verification. This program provides the much needed financing for energy efficiency projects without the burden of increased debt. The program allows for procurement of financing without voter approval or extending existing dept. The program requires evaluation to ensure a positive cash-flow through the entire 15 year financing period. The first phase of implementing an ESIP is the development of an Energy Savings Plan (ESP) to verify the energy savings, construction costs, and overall financial model. The underlining program requirement is the limitation of the project term to 15 years. The ESIP project size is open for multiple buildings to be included within one project. In addition all applicable incentive programs can also be utilized to help reduce the overall construction cost.



XI. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS In addition to the ECMs and REMs, there are maintenance and operational measures that can provide significant energy savings and provide immediate benefit, many of which facility’s staff are already performing. Maintenance items and small operational improvements are typically achievable with on-site staff or maintenance contractors and in turn have the potential to provide substantial operational savings compared to the costs associated. The following are recommendations which should be considered a priority in achieving an energy efficient building

A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output.

D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

E. Confirm that outside air economizers on the rooftop units are functioning properly to take advantage of free cooling and avoid excess outside air during occupied periods.

F. Perform annual steam trap surveys to minimize energy waste caused by failed traps, and to maintain an inventory of system equipment.

G. Verify all HVAC control systems are utilizing setback and scheduling capabilities.

H. The School should consider the installation of advanced power strips in classrooms that can be used to power/charge computer, printers, monitors, speakers, tablets, and laptop computers in order to reduce the amount of idle power draw from these devices. (Smart Power Strips Model LPG3, Price ~$30)

I. Educate staff and students on awareness of wasteful energy practices such as leaving lights on unnecessarily, leaving on of non-essential computer and/or equipment at the end of the day, leaving of outside doors/windows open as a means to control room temperature, etc.



XII. ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS The assumptions utilized in this energy audit include but are not limited to following:

A. Cost Estimates noted within this report are based on industry accepted costing data such as RS MeansTM Cost Data, contractor pricing and engineering estimates. All cost estimates for this level of auditing are +/- 20%. Prevailing wage rates for the specified region has been utilized to calculate installation costs. The cost estimates indicated within this audit should be utilized by the owner for prioritizing further project development post the energy audit. Project development would include investment grade auditing and detailed engineering.

B. Energy savings noted within this audit are calculated utilizing industry standard procedures and accepted engineering assumptions. For this level of auditing, energy savings are not guaranteed.

C. Information gathering for each facility is strongly based on interviews with operations personnel. Information dependent on verbal feedback is used for calculation assumptions including but not limited to the following:

a. operating hours b. equipment type c. control strategies d. scheduling

D. Information contained within the major equipment list is based on the existing owner documentation where available (drawings, O&M manuals, etc.). If existing owner documentation is not available, catalog information is utilized to populate the required information.

E. Equipment incentives and energy credits are based on current pricing and status of rebate programs. Rebate availability is dependent on the individual program funding and applicability.

F. Equipment (HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, & Lighting) noted within an ECM recommendation is strictly noted as a basis for calculation of energy savings. The owner should use this equipment information as a benchmark when pursuing further investment grade project development and detailed engineering for specific energy conservation measures.

G. Utility bill annual averages are utilized for calculation of all energy costs unless otherwise noted. Accuracy of the utility energy usage and costs are based on the information provided. Utility information including usage and costs is estimated where incomplete data is provided.

H. Greenhouse Gas Emissions are calculated for each ECM, the basis for these emissions reductions are NJCEP published standard emissions factors, which are the following:.

a. Electric Savings: 1. CO2: 1.52 lbs/kWh 2. NOX: 0.0028 lbs/kWh 3. SO2: 0.0065 lbs/kWh

b. Natural Gas Savings: 1. CO2: 11.7 lbs/therm 2. NOX: 0.0092 lbs/therm

Appendix Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (IRR)

NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV)

MATERIAL LABORREBATES,

INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost)

(Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade - Interior $625 $400 $200 $825 $550 $0 $550 15 $8,250 $0 900.0% 1.5 66.64% $5,740.86

ECM #2 Lighting Upgrade - T8 to LED $96,000 $32,000 $24,750 $103,250 $4,008 $1,000 $5,008 15 $75,120 $15,000 -27.2% 20.6 -3.74% ($43,464.82)

ECM #3 Lighting Upgrade - Exterior $7,000 $3,000 $1,975 $8,025 $1,392 $0 $1,392 15 $20,880 $0 160.2% 5.8 15.29% $8,592.61

ECM #4 Lighting Controls $14,600 $3,400 $135 $17,865 $2,386 $0 $2,386 15 $35,790 $0 100.3% 7.5 10.28% $10,618.91

ECM #5 Refrigerator Replacement $780 $0 $0 $780 $62 $0 $62 15 $930 $0 19.2% 12.6 2.28% ($39.85)

ECM #6 CRT Monitor Replacement $375 $0 $0 $375 $44 $0 $44 15 $660 $0 76.0% 8.5 8.07% $150.27

ECM #7 Computer Power Optimization $6,500 $3,500 $0 $10,000 $1,665 $0 $1,665 15 $24,975 $0 149.8% 6.0 14.45% $9,876.66

ECM #8 De-stratification Fans $3,000 $2,000 $0 $5,000 $412 $0 $412 15 $6,180 $0 23.6% 12.1 2.77% ($81.57)

ECM #9 High Efficiency XFMR $18,000 $8,000 $0 $26,000 $2,218 $0 $2,218 15 $33,270 $0 28.0% 11.7 3.25% $478.34

ECM #10 Fuel Conversion to Natural Gas $3,500 $5,500 $0 $9,000 $7,156 $0 $7,156 15 $107,340 $0 1092.7% 1.3 79.50% $76,427.86

ECM #11 Electric to HW Conversion $110,000 $80,000 $0 $190,000 $4,188 $0 $4,188 20 $83,760 $0 -55.9% 45.4 -6.79% ($127,693.14)

ECM #12 Rooftop HP Replacement $35,000 $33,000 $0 $68,000 $1,030 $0 $1,030 15 $15,450 $0 -77.3% 66.0 -14.58% ($55,704.17)

ECM #13 Rooftop HP to Natural Gas $40,000 $35,000 $1,174 $73,826 $1,332 $0 $1,332 15 $19,980 $0 -72.9% 55.4 -13% ($57,924.67)

ECM #14 Air to Air HP to Geothermal $98,000 $105,000 $8,100 $194,900 $3,964 $0 $3,964 20 $79,280 $0 -59.3% 49.2 - ($135,925.69)

ECM #15 Energy Star Kitchen Equipment $9,500 $5,000 $500 $14,000 $833 $0 $833 15 $12,495 $0 -10.8% 16.8 -1.39% ($4,055.70)

REM #1 95 kW Solar Array $255,472 $170,315 $0 $425,787 $17,955 $22,134 $40,089 15 $601,335 $332,010 41.2% 10.6 4.66% $52,792.88

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWN

CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

Estell Manor School

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGS

ECM LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY



APPENDIX B

Appendix B Page 1 of 4

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014:

Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $16 - $170 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $450 per ton

Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure

path)

Desiccant Systems

$1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC

Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton

Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton

Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

A/C Economizing Controls < 5 tons $85/unit; >5 tons $170/unit


Gas Heating

Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH $2.00 per MBH, but not less than

$300 per unit

Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH $1.75 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers ≥1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH $1.00 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure

Path)

Gas Furnaces $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 95%

Boiler Economizing Controls $1,200 - $2,700

Low Intensity Infrared Heating $300 - $500 per unit


Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20


Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp

Chilled-Water Pumps ≥ 20 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Rotary Screw Air Compressors ≥ 25 hp $5,250 to $12,500 per drive

Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Boiler Fans > 5 HP $65 to $155 per hp

Boiler Feed Water Pumps > 5 HP $60 to $155 per hp

Commercial Kitchen Hood up to 50 HP Retrofit $55 – $300 per hp

New Hood $55 - $250 per hp

Natural Gas Water Heating

Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67 energy factor or better

$50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH

Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH

Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit

Prescriptive Lighting

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

For retrofit of T-8 fixtures by permanent de-lamping & new reflectors

(Electronic ballast replacement required)

$15 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $200 per fixture

Metal Halide w/Pulse Start Including Parking Lot (For fixtures ≥ 150w)

$25 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replace with new induction fixture.

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$70 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture


Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot

LED Portable Desk Lamp $20 per fixture

LED Wall-wash Lights $30 per fixture

LED Recessed Down Lights $35 per fixture LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area

and Roadway Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries

$175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries

$100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures

$50 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs.

$150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Stairwell and Passageway Luminaires

$40 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

Luminaires for Ambient Lighting of Interior Commercial Spaces

(1x4, 2x2, 2x4) $50 per fixture

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED Screw-based & Pin-based (PAR, MR, BR, R) Standards (A-Style) and

Decorative Lamps

$10 per lamp for R/PAR20,MR/PAR16,Globe,Candelabra

or Misc $20 per lamp for R/BR/PAR 30,

R/BR/PAR 38-40, A-Lamp

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$30 per 4 foot $42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

LED Retrofit Kits To be evaluated through the customer

measure path


Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors Wall Mounted

(Existing Facilities Only) $20 per control

Remote Mounted (Existing Facilities Only)

$35 per control

Daylight Dimming Controls $45 per fixture controlled

Occupancy Based hi-low Dimming Control

$35 per fixture controlled

Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted $35 per control

Refrigeration Doors/Covers

Energy-Efficient Doors/Covers for Installation on Open Refrigerated Cases

$100 per door

Aluminum Night Curtains for Installation on Open Refrigerated Cases

$3.50 per linear foot

Refrigeration Controls

Door Heater Controls $50 per control Electric Defrost Controls $50 per control Evaporator Fan Controls $75 per control Novelty Cooler Shutoff $50 per control

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives

not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000

KWh or 1,500 Therms and an IRR of at least 10%.



APPENDIX C

ENERGY STAR® Statement of EnergyPerformance

32ENERGY STAR®

Score1

Estell Manor School

Primary Property Function: K-12 SchoolGross Floor Area (ft²): 43,366Built: 1955

For Year Ending: December 31, 2013Date Generated: February 25, 2014

1. The ENERGY STAR score is a 1-100 assessment of a building’s energy efficiency as compared with similar buildings nationwide, adjusting forclimate and business activity.

Property & Contact Information

Property AddressEstell Manor School128 Cape May AvenueEstell Manor, New Jersey 08319

Property Owner__________________,(____)____-______

Primary ContactRosa Millar128 Cape May AvenueEstell Manor, NJ [email protected]

Property ID: 3958034

Energy Consumption and Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

Site EUI55.8 kBtu/ft²

Annual Energy by FuelPropane (kBtu) 40,358 (2%)Fuel Oil (No. 2) (kBtu) 414,000 (17%)Electric - Grid (kBtu) 1,967,314 (81%)

National Median ComparisonNational Median Site EUI (kBtu/ft²) 47.5National Median Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) 130.3% Diff from National Median Source EUI 17%

Source EUI153 kBtu/ft²

Annual EmissionsGreenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO2e/year) 282

Signature & Stamp of Verifying Professional

I ___________________ (Name) verify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Signature: _______________________Date: ___________

Licensed Professional

____ ________,(____)____-________________________

Professional Engineer Stamp(if applicable)



APPENDIX D

Appendix D

Page 1 of 14

Window A/CTag WAC WAC

Unit Type Window A/C Window A/C

Qty 11 1

LocationClassrooms (1955,

1975)Speech Office

Area Served Classrooms Speech Office

Manufacturer Thermal Zone Amana

Model # WAC412230R -

Serial # - -

Refrigerant R410a R22

Cooling Capacity (Btu/h) 12,300 12,000.0

Cooling Efficiency (EER) 9.8 EER 8.5 EER (Est.)

Volts / Phase / Hz 208-230/1/60 -

Approx Age - -

ASHRAE Service Life 10 10

Remaining Life - -

Comments Older Unit

Note:

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Estell Manor School

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Appendix D

Page 2 of 14

AHUsTag ERU-1 RTU-1 RHP-1

Unit TypeEnergy Recovery

RooftopGeothermal Rooftop Rooftop Heat Pump

Qty 1 1 1

Location Gym Roof Gym Roof 1995 Roof

Area Served Gymnasium RTU Gymnasium Main Office Area

Manufacturer Semco FHP Trane

Model # FV5000-6RN4AB PGY240K04A WCD075C400BB

Serial # 32918/MO19912-01 31971701001 J331424180

Cooling Type None Geothermal Heat Pump

Cooling Capacity (Tons) N/A 20.0 6.5

Cooling Efficiency (EER) N/A 14.00 9.00

Heating Type None Geothermal Electric

Heating Input (MBH) N/A 180 18 kW

Heating Efficiency (%) N/A 3.4 COP 3 COP

Supply Fan (HP) 5.00 5.00 1.00

Approx Age 9 9 15

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 6 6 0

Comments 5 HP EF, 1/6 HP Wheel Motor

Note:


Estell Manor School


Appendix D

Page 3 of 14

AHUsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Cooling Type

Cooling Capacity (Tons)

Cooling Efficiency (EER)

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Heating Efficiency (%)

Supply Fan (HP)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


RHP-2 RHP-3 HP-4

Rooftop Heat Pump Rooftop Heat Pump Geothermal HP

1 1 1

1995 Roof 1995 Roof Mech Room

Classroom 109 Classroom 110 Gym Office, Rear Exit

Trane Trane FHP

WCD036C4 WCD060C400BB GT042-4VTC

- J391424220 KK046590

Heat Pump Heat Pump Heat Pump

3.0 5.0 3.5

9.00 9.00 16.60

Electric Electric Geothermal

6 kW 12 kW 42

3 COP 3 COP 3.7 COP

0.33 0.60 0.50

15 15 9

15 15 20

0 0 11

Appendix D

Page 4 of 14

AHUsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)


Supply Fan (HP)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


UV-1 (AC-7) UV UV-2 (AC-3A)

Unit Ventilator Unit Ventilator Unit Ventilator

5 6

Classroom 10 Classroom (1955) Classroom (1995)

Classroom 10 Classroom (1955) Classroom (1995)

Trane Nesbitt Trane

THPA03040C01B.WC0A150

-THPA04041C01B1CC

0AA00

W94L23857 - W94L24045

Heat Pump None Heat Pump

2.5 N/A 3.5

10 SEER N/A 9.5 SEER

Electric Steam Electric

10 kW - 13.2 kW

2.8 COP - 3.2 COP

- - 0.25

19 20 19

20 20 20

1 0 1

Appendix D

Page 5 of 14

AHUsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)


Supply Fan (HP)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


HP-1 HP-2 HP-3

Geothermal Heat Pump Geothermal Heat Pump Geothermal Heat Pump

1 1 1

Corridor Ceiling Corridor Ceiling Corridor Ceiling

Corridor, Classroom 132

Lobby, Classroom 133Corridor, Restrooms

(2004)

FHP FHP FHP

GT070 GT048 GT018

- - -

Geothermal Geothermal Geothermal

6.0 3.5 1

14.20 15.80 18.3

Geothermal Geothermal Geothermal

50 35 12

3.4 COP 3.5 COP 3.7 COP

0.75 0.50 0.25

9 9 9

20 20 15

11 11 6

Appendix D

Page 6 of 14

AHUsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Cooling Type



Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)


Supply Fan (HP)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


UV

Unit Ventilator

Classroom (1975)

Classroom (1975)

-

-

-

None

N/A

N/A

Electric

10 - 15 kW (Est)

100%

0.17

20

20

0

Appendix D

Page 7 of 14

Domestic Water HeatersTag WWH-1 HWH-1 HWH-2

Unit Type Geo Water to Water Electric Boiler Fuel Fired Heater

Qty 1 1 1

Location Mech Room Storage room Boiler Room

Area Served DHW Addition 2004 1975, 1995 Addition 1955 wing

Manufacturer Addison Bradford & White Bock

Model # WWH-060 MII120-18-3SF-042 32E

Serial # - HK-01-3405 12121558T

Size (Gallons) 80 119 32

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

60 MBH 18 kW 104 MBH

Recovery (Gal/Hr) 150 - 114

Efficiency % 5.0 COP 100% 82%

Fuel Electric (Geo) Electric Fuel Oil #2

Approx Age 9 2 2



Comments w/ 80 Gallon A.O. Smith Storage Tank

0.75 GPH

Note:

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

Concord Engineering Group

Estell Manor School


Appendix D

Page 8 of 14

BoilersTag B-1

Unit Type Oil Fired Boiler

Qty 1

Location Boiler Room

Area Served 1955, 1975 Addition

Manufacturer Weil McLain

Model # 880

Serial # -

Input Capacity (Btu/Hr) 1,082,000

Rated Output Capacity (Btu/Hr)

872,000

Approx. Efficiency % 81%

Fuel Fuel Oil #2

Approx Age 3

ASHRAE Service Life 35

Remaining Life 32

Comments 7.5 GPH

Note:


MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

Concord Engineering Group

Estell Manor School

Appendix D

Page 9 of 14

PumpsTag P-1, 2 DWP-1,2

Unit Type End Suction Pump Booster Skid

Qty 2 2

Location Mech Room Boiler Room

Area Served Addition 2004Domestic Circulation

Pump

Manufacturer B&G Delta P Systems

Model # 1510 BF 10.500 DDPVM-VFD-LL

Serial # CR4514-01-A40 -

Horse Power 10.0 0.5

Flow 150 GPM, 125' HD 50 GPM, 64' HD

Motor InfoWestinghouse, US

Motor, 215TBaldor, Fr 56C

Electrical Power 230/460V 230/460V

RPM 1755 3450

Motor Efficiency % 90.2% , 87.5% 68.0%

Approx Age 9 2



Comments

Note:


Estell Manor School


Appendix D

Page 10 of 14

Exhaust FansTag EF-1 EF-9&10 EF-7&8

Unit Type Downblast Downblast Downblast

Qty 1 2 2

Location Gym Roof 1995 Roof 1995 Roof

Area Served 2004 Restrooms

Manufacturer Greenheck Penn Ventilation Penn Ventilation

Model # GB-091-4 DX14B DXAQ-10

Serial # 04A04448 - -

Motor (HP) - - -

Electrical (V/H/P) - - -

Approx Age 9 14 14



Comments Off Off

Note:


Estell Manor School


Appendix D

Page 11 of 14

Exhaust FansTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Motor (HP)

Electrical (V/H/P)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


EF-3 EF-1 EF-4

Downblast Downblast Downblast

2 1 1

1995 Roof 1995 Roof 1995 Roof

Penn Ventilation Penn Ventilation Penn Ventilation

DXAQ-10 DX9B XR94

- - -

- - -

- - -

14 14 14

20 20 20

6 6 6

On Off Off

Appendix D

Page 12 of 14

Exhaust FansTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Motor (HP)

Electrical (V/H/P)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


EF-5 EF-2 EF-6


1 1 1


Penn Ventilation Penn Ventilation Penn Ventilation

FX13B XQ94 DX12B

- - -

- - 1/4

- - 115/60/1

14 14 14

20 20 20

6 6 6

Off

Appendix D

Page 13 of 14

Exhaust FansTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Motor (HP)

Electrical (V/H/P)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


EF-12 EF-13 EF-14


1 1 1


Penn Ventilation Penn Barry Penn Ventilation

DXAQ10 DX12B DXAQ10

- C12EZ60916 -

- 1/4 -

- 115/60/1 -

14 9 14

20 20 20

6 11 6

Appendix D

Page 14 of 14

Exhaust FansTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Motor (HP)

Electrical (V/H/P)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


KEF-1 EF

Upblast Downblast

1 8

1975 Roof 1975 Roof

Kitchen Hood

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

20 20



APPENDIX E

ECM #1 - InteriorECM #3 - ExteriorECM #4 - Controls

CEG Project #:

Facility Name:

Address:

City, State, Zip

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours

DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Work Description Equipment DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #

Controls DescriptionQty of

Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Material Total Labor Total AllRebate

EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal

MaterialsTotal Labor Total All

Simple Payback

1 Main Office 26002x2 4-Lamp 17w T8 Recessed Prismatic

4 63 11 0.69 1,802 Existing to Remain No Change 4 63 0 0.69 1,802 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Super/Principal Office 26002x2 4-Lamp 17w T8 Recessed Prismatic

4 63 8 0.50 1,310 Existing to Remain No Change 4 63 0 0.50 1,310 0.00 0 $0 6Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt.

1 20.0% 262 $41 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 1.97

1107 Conference

Room2600

2x2 4-Lamp 17w T8 Recessed Prismatic

4 63 6 0.38 983 Existing to Remain No Change 4 63 0 0.38 983 0.00 0 $0 6Dual Technology


1 20.0% 197 $30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 2.63

2Bathroom - Main

Office3000

2x2 2-Lamp 32w T8 U-6" Recessed Prismatic



1 20.0% 37 $6 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 17.34

1Business Admin

Office2600




1 20.0% 262 $41 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 1.97

3Kitchenette Main

Office2600


2 62 1 0.06 161 Existing to Remain No Change 2 62 0 0.06 161 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 IT Closet 15001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8

Surface Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 93 Existing to Remain No Change 2 62 0 0.06 93 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

5121 - Buildings & Grounds Office

26001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Pendant Prismatic



1 20.0% 97 $15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 5.34

5 124 - Electric Room 15001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Pendant Prismatic


Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 20.0% 37 $6 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 43.36

6 Classroom #2 (1955) 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8

Surface Prismatic 2 62 12 0.74 1,637 Existing to Remain No Change 2 62 0 0.74 1,637 0.00 0 $0 4

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole

Powerpack - Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 327 $51 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $300.00 $50.00 $350.00 FALSE 6.90

1 30002x2 4-Lamp 17w T8 Recessed Prismatic



1 20.0% 38 $6 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 42.67

7 20002x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Paracube



0 20.0% 50 $8 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




1 20.0% 38 $6 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 42.67




0 20.0% 74 $12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00





6 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8




8 22004' 1-Lamp 32w T8

Surface Strip1 32 1 0.03 70 Existing to Remain No Change 1 32 0 0.03 70 0.00 0 $0 4



6 CST Office (1955) 26001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8

Surface Prismatic 2 62 2 0.12 322 Existing to Remain No Change 2 62 0 0.12 322 0.00 0 $0 5

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor -

Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 64 $10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 25.01

6 Speech Office (1955) 26001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8



Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 64 $10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 25.01

9 Speech Office Toilet 1200 60w Incandescent A-Lamp 1 60 1 0.06 72 Re-Lamp Phillips A19 12.5w LED Lamp 1 12.5 1 0.01 15 0.05 57 $9 6Dual Technology


1 20.0% 3 $0 $27.00 $16.25 $43.25 $20.00 2.63 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 215.05

6 26001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8



Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 129 $20 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 10.76

10 2600 40w Incandescent A-Lamp 1 40 2 0.08 208 Re-Lamp Phillips A19 8w LED Lamp 1 8 2 0.02 42 0.06 166 $26 5Dual Technology


0 20.0% 8 $1 $36.00 $32.50 $68.50 $40.00 1.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00









6Classroom #8

(Library)2000

1x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Surface Prismatic

2 62 20 1.24 2,480 Existing to Remain No Change 2 62 0 1.24 2,480 0.00 0 $0 4











11 Storage Room (1975) 15001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8

Surface No Lens Tube Guard



1 20.0% 149 $23 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 10.84

6 Cafeteria (1975) 26001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8



Powerpack - Remote Mnt.4 20.0% 1,773 $275 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $1,200.00 $200.00 $1,400.00 FALSE 5.09

1C13529 (ECM#1)

Estell Manor School

Estell Manor, NJ 08319

128 Cape May Avenue

Boy's Restroom (1955)

Girl's Restroom (1955)

Kindergarten (1955)

Child Study Office (1955)

LIGHTING CONTROLS COSTRETROFIT ENERGY SAVINGSEXISTING FIXTURES PROPOSED FIXTURE RETROFIT PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS LIGHTING RETROFIT COSTS

Smart Start Incentive

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - Estell Manor School Alt 2.xlsx Page 1 of 4


Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback



12 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Surface Opaque Lens

2 62 12 0.74 1,637 Existing to Remain No Change 2 62 0 0.74 1,637 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

13 12001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Surface Vaportight


6 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8


12 Dishwasher Room 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Surface Opaque Lens


6 Kitchen Storage 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8










14Classroom #10 Toilet

#11200

2' 2-Lamp 17w T8 Wall Mount Wrap



1 20.0% 8 $1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 81.46


#21200




1 20.0% 8 $1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 81.46

6 #11 Faculty Lounge 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8




14#11 Faculty

Toilet #11200




1 20.0% 8 $1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 81.46

14#11 Faculty

Toilet #21200




1 20.0% 8 $1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 81.46

15 102 Nurse's Office 26002x4 3-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic




2 Nurse's Toilet 12002x2 2-Lamp 32w T8 U-6"

Recessed Prismatic2 62 1 0.06 74 Existing to Remain No Change 2 62 0 0.06 74 0.00 0 $0 6


Switch Mnt.1 20.0% 15 $2 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 43.36

15 Nurse Storage Closet 15002x4 3-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic



1 20.0% 28 $4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 23.12

3Classroom #109

(1995)2200





6Custodian Closet

(1995)1500




1 20.0% 19 $3 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 34.69

16 30002x2 2-Lamp 34w T12 U

Recessed Prismatic 2 72 1 0.07 216 Existing to Remain No Change 2 72 0 0.07 216 0.00 0 $0 5


Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 43 $7 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 37.34




0 20.0% 112 $17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

16 30002x2 2-Lamp 34w T12 U

Recessed Prismatic 2 72 1 0.07 216 Existing to Remain No Change 2 72 0 0.07 216 0.00 0 $0 5


Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 43 $7 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 37.34




0 20.0% 112 $17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

17Classroom #115

(1995)2200





17Classroom #114

(1995)2200





18Classroom #110

(1995)2200

2x4 4-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Parabolic




17Classroom #111

(1995)2200





17Classroom #112

(1995)1000





17Classroom #113

(1995)2200





19Storage #128

(2004)1500

1x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Pendant Utility Wire Guard



2 20.0% 186 $29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $400.00 $100.00 $500.00 FALSE 17.34

19Custodian Closet

(2004)1000




1 20.0% 25 $4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 26.01

2Boy's Restroom

(2004)3000




1 20.0% 223 $35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 7.23

2 Girl's Retroom (2004) 30002x2 2-Lamp 32w T8 U-6"

Recessed Prismatic2 62 6 0.37 1,116 Existing to Remain No Change 2 62 0 0.37 1,116 0.00 0 $0 5


Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 223 $35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 7.23

Kitchen (1975)





Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback



20 Gymnasium 10008-Lamp 42w CFL High-

Bay8 336 24 8.06 8,064 Existing to Remain No Change 8 336 0 8.06 8,064 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

15 Gym Rear Exit 26002x4 3-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic


15 Gym Office #129 26002x4 3-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic



1 20.0% 97 $15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 5.34

2 26002x2 2-Lamp 32w T8 U-6"

Recessed Prismatic2 62 1 0.06 161 Existing to Remain No Change 2 62 0 0.06 161 0.00 0 $0 6


Switch Mnt.1 20.0% 32 $5 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 20.01

14 26002' 2-Lamp 17w T8 Wall Mount Wrap


21 2600 18w CFL Shower Light 1 18 1 0.02 47 Existing to Remain No Change 1 18 0 0.02 47 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

22 Stage 1000250w Metal Halide High-

Bay1 295 2 0.59 590 Replace Fixture

3-Lamp T5HO High-Bay Fixture

3 182 2 0.36 364 0.23 226 $35 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $500.00 $300.00 $800.00 $100.00 19.98 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

17 Music Room #132 22002x4 4-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic






23 32002-Lamp 32w T8 Steel

Truss Pendant 2 66 14 0.92 2,957 Remove

Demo and Dispose use existing recessed lighting

0 0 14 0.00 0 0.92 2,957 $458 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

15 Hallway 2004 Section 32002x4 3-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic



Powerpack - Remote Mnt.3 20.0% 774 $120 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $900.00 $150.00 $1,050.00 FALSE 8.75




Powerpack - Remote Mnt.3 20.0% 992 $154 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $900.00 $150.00 $1,050.00 FALSE 6.83

24Hallway 1975-1955

Section3200

2x2 2-Lamp 17w T8 Recessed Opaque w/

Reflector2 33 19 0.63 2,006 Existing to Remain No Change 2 33 0 0.63 2,006 0.00 0 $0 4


Powerpack - Remote Mnt.4 20.0% 401 $62 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $1,200.00 $200.00 $1,400.00 FALSE 22.51

91955 Storage Closet

A1500 60w Incandescent A-Lamp 1 60 1 0.06 90 Re-Lamp Phillips A19 12.5w LED Lamp 1 12.5 1 0.01 19 0.05 71 $11 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $27.00 $16.25 $43.25 $20.00 2.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

25 1955 Storage Closet B 1500 36w CFL Medium Base 1 36 1 0.04 54 Existing to Remain No Change 1 36 0 0.04 54 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

91955 Large Storage

Closet 1500 60w Incandescent A-Lamp 1 60 1 0.06 90 Re-Lamp Phillips A19 12.5w LED Lamp 1 12.5 1 0.01 19 0.05 71 $11 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $27.00 $16.25 $43.25 $20.00 2.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

16Men's Faculty Toilet

(1995)1200

2x2 2-Lamp 34w T12 U Recessed Prismatic



1 20.0% 17 $3 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 37.34

16Women's Faculty

Toilet (1995)1200




1 20.0% 17 $3 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 37.34

25Hallway Drink

Fountain (1995)3200 36w CFL Medium Base 1 36 1 0.04 115 Existing to Remain No Change 1 36 0 0.04 115 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 40008" Recessed Can 70w HID

Metal Halide1 92 2 0.18 736 Re-lamp & Bypass ballast

30w LED Par 56 Self-ballast Mogul Base Lamp


27 400015w CFL Up/Down

Wall Mount Spot Lights 1 15 4 0.06 240 Existing to Remain No Change 1 15 0 0.06 240 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

28Exterior - '55

Entrance4000

6" Square Recessed 15w CFL


28Exterior - '55

Classroom Exit4000



28Exterior - '75 Cafeteria Exit

40006" Square Recessed 15w

CFL1 15 1 0.02 60 Existing to Remain No Change 1 15 0 0.02 60 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

9Exterior - '55 Boiler

Room Exit4000 60w Incandescent A-Lamp 1 60 1 0.06 240 Re-Lamp Phillips A19 12.5w LED Lamp 1 12.5 1 0.01 50 0.05 190 $29 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $27.00 $16.25 $43.25 $20.00 0.79 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

29 4000Recessed Can 50w HID High Pressure Sodium

1 61 2 0.12 488 Re-lamp & Bypass ballast30w LED Par 56 Self-ballast

Mogul Base Lamp1 31 2 0.06 248 0.06 240 $37 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $340.00 $130.00 $470.00 $70.00 10.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

30 4000 100w HPS Wallpak 1 116 1 0.12 464 Replace Fixture 26w LED Wall Pack 1 26 1 0.03 104 0.09 360 $56 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $200.00 $150.00 $350.00 $100.00 4.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

29Exterior - '04 Gym

Rear Exit #124000

Recessed Can 50w HID High Pressure Sodium




Rear Exit #134000




30 Exterior - '04 4000 100w HPS Wallpak 1 116 5 0.58 2,320 Replace Fixture 26w LED Wall Pack 1 26 5 0.13 520 0.45 1,800 $279 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,000.00 $750.00 $1,750.00 $500.00 4.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


Side Exit #184000




Exterior - '95 Entrance

Exterior - '04 Gym Hall Rear Exit #11

Gym Office Restroom

Gym Lobby



Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback






31 40009" Recessed 100w Metal

Halide 1 122 4 0.49 1,952 Re-lamp & Bypass ballast



30 Exterior 4000 100w HPS Wallpak 1 116 2 0.23 928 Replace Fixture 26w LED Wall Pack 1 26 2 0.05 208 0.18 720 $112 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $400.00 $300.00 $700.00 $200.00 4.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

32 Exterior - Pole Lamps 4000250w Pole Mounted

Shoebox HPS Type III1 302 3 0.91 3,624 Replace Fixture Head RAB 78w LED Area Light 1 78 3 0.23 936 0.67 2,688 $417 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $2,250.00 $450.00 $2,700.00 $525.00 5.22 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

TOTAL 587 49 108,407 51 45 95,876 4 12,531 $1,942 68 12 15,391 $2,386 $7,554 $3,218 $10,772 $2,175 4.43 $14,600 $3,400 $18,000 $135.00 $7.49

Exterior - '04 Main Entry


ECM #2 - T8 to LED

CEG Project #:

Facility Name:

Address:

City, State, Zip

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback

1 Main Office 26002x2 4-Lamp 17w T8 Recessed Prismatic

4 63 11 0.69 1,802 Replace Fixture 2x2 Recessed LED 38w 1 38 11 0.42 1,087 0.28 715 $111 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,650.00 $715.00 $2,365.00 $550.00 16.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Super/Principal Office 26002x2 4-Lamp 17w T8 Recessed Prismatic

4 63 8 0.50 1,310 Replace Fixture 2x2 Recessed LED 38w 1 38 8 0.30 790 0.20 520 $81 6Dual Technology


1 20.0% 158 $25 $1,200.00 $520.00 $1,720.00 $400.00 16.38 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 3.26

1107 Conference

Room2600


4 63 6 0.38 983 Replace Fixture 2x2 Recessed LED 38w 1 38 6 0.23 593 0.15 390 $60 6Dual Technology


1 20.0% 119 $18 $900.00 $390.00 $1,290.00 $300.00 16.38 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 4.35

2Bathroom - Main

Office3000




1 20.0% 12 $2 $139.00 $65.00 $204.00 $50.00 7.89 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 53.76

1Business Admin

Office2600




1 20.0% 158 $25 $1,200.00 $520.00 $1,720.00 $400.00 16.38 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 3.26

3Kitchenette Main

Office2600


2 62 1 0.06 161 Replace Fixture 2x4 Recessed LED 48w 1 48 1 0.05 125 0.01 36 $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $200.00 $65.00 $265.00 $50.00 38.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 IT Closet 15001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8

Surface Prismatic 2 62 1 0.06 93 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface LED 48w 1 48 1 0.05 72 0.01 21 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $200.00 $65.00 $265.00 $50.00 66.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

5121 - Buildings & Grounds Office

26001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Pendant Prismatic

2 62 3 0.19 484 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface-Pendant LED 48w 1 48 3 0.14 374 0.04 109 $17 6Dual Technology


1 20.0% 75 $12 $600.00 $195.00 $795.00 $150.00 38.11 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 6.89

5 124 - Electric Room 15001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Pendant Prismatic

2 62 2 0.12 186 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface-Pendant LED 48w 1 48 2 0.10 144 0.03 42 $7 5Dual Technology


1 20.0% 29 $4 $400.00 $130.00 $530.00 $100.00 66.05 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 56.00


Surface Prismatic 2 62 12 0.74 1,637 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface LED 48w 1 48 12 0.58 1,267 0.17 370 $57 4


Powerpack - Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 253 $39 $2,400.00 $780.00 $3,180.00 $600.00 45.04 $300.00 $50.00 $350.00 FALSE 8.91




1 20.0% 23 $4 $150.00 $65.00 $215.00 $50.00 14.19 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 70.74




0 20.0% 38 $6 $400.00 $130.00 $530.00 $100.00 49.54 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00




1 20.0% 23 $4 $150.00 $65.00 $215.00 $50.00 14.19 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 70.74




0 20.0% 58 $9 $400.00 $130.00 $530.00 $100.00 33.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00





6 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8




8 22004' 1-Lamp 32w T8

Surface Strip1 32 1 0.03 70 Existing to Remain No Change 1 32 0 0.03 70 0.00 0 $0 4



6 CST Office (1955) 26001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8

Surface Prismatic 2 62 2 0.12 322 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface LED 48w 1 48 2 0.10 250 0.03 73 $11 5


Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 50 $8 $400.00 $130.00 $530.00 $100.00 38.11 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 32.31

6 Speech Office (1955) 26001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8



Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 50 $8 $400.00 $130.00 $530.00 $100.00 38.11 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 32.31

9 Speech Office Toilet 1200 60w Incandescent A-Lamp 1 60 1 0.06 72 Re-Lamp Phillips A19 12.5w LED Lamp 1 12.5 1 0.01 15 0.05 57 $9 6Dual Technology


1 20.0% 3 $0 $27.00 $16.25 $43.25 $20.00 2.63 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 215.05

6 26001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8



Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 100 $15 $800.00 $260.00 $1,060.00 $200.00 38.11 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 13.89

10 2600 40w Incandescent A-Lamp 1 40 2 0.08 208 Re-Lamp Phillips A19 8w LED Lamp 1 8 2 0.02 42 0.06 166 $26 5Dual Technology


0 20.0% 8 $1 $36.00 $32.50 $68.50 $40.00 1.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00









6Classroom #8

(Library)2000


2 62 20 1.24 2,480 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface LED 48w 1 48 20 0.96 1,920 0.28 560 $87 4


Powerpack - Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 384 $60 $4,000.00 $1,300.00 $5,300.00 $1,000.00 49.54 $300.00 $50.00 $350.00 FALSE 5.88




Powerpack - Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 380 $59 $3,600.00 $1,170.00 $4,770.00 $900.00 45.04 $300.00 $50.00 $350.00 FALSE 5.94





11 Storage Room (1975) 15001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8

Surface No Lens Tube Guard

2 62 8 0.50 744 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface LED 48w 1 48 8 0.38 576 0.11 168 $26 5Dual Technology


1 20.0% 115 $18 $1,600.00 $520.00 $2,120.00 $400.00 66.05 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 14.00

6 Cafeteria (1975) 26001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8

Surface Prismatic 2 62 55 3.41 8,866 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface LED 48w 1 48 55 2.64 6,864 0.77 2,002 $310 4


Powerpack - Remote Mnt.4 20.0% 1,373 $213 $11,000.00 $3,575.00 $14,575.00 $2,750.00 38.11 $1,200.00 $200.00 $1,400.00 FALSE 6.58



1C13529 (ECM#2)

Estell Manor School

Estell Manor, NJ 08319

128 Cape May Avenue



Kindergarten (1955)

Child Study Office (1955)

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - Estell Manor School.xlsx Page 1 of 4

ECM #2 - T8 to LED

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback



12 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Surface Opaque Lens

2 62 12 0.74 1,637 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface LED 48w 1 48 12 0.58 1,267 0.17 370 $57 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $2,400.00 $780.00 $3,180.00 $600.00 45.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

13 12001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Surface Vaportight

2 62 2 0.12 149 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface LED 48w 1 48 2 0.10 115 0.03 34 $5 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $400.00 $130.00 $530.00 $100.00 82.57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

6 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8


12 Dishwasher Room 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8 Surface Opaque Lens

2 62 2 0.12 273 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface LED 48w 1 48 2 0.10 211 0.03 62 $10 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $400.00 $130.00 $530.00 $100.00 45.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

6 Kitchen Storage 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8











#11200




1 20.0% 8 $1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 81.46


#21200




1 20.0% 8 $1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 81.46

6 #11 Faculty Lounge 22001x4 2-Lamp 32w T8

Surface Prismatic 2 62 9 0.56 1,228 Replace Fixture 1x4 Surface LED 48w 1 48 9 0.43 950 0.13 277 $43 4



14#11 Faculty

Toilet #11200




1 20.0% 8 $1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 81.46

14#11 Faculty

Toilet #21200




1 20.0% 8 $1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 81.46

15 102 Nurse's Office 26002x4 3-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic

3 93 9 0.84 2,176 Replace Fixture 2x4 Recessed LED 64w 1 64 9 0.58 1,498 0.26 679 $105 4



2 Nurse's Toilet 12002x2 2-Lamp 32w T8 U-6"

Recessed Prismatic2 62 1 0.06 74 Replace Fixture 2x2 Recessed LED 20w 1 20 1 0.02 24 0.04 50 $8 6


Switch Mnt.1 20.0% 5 $1 $139.00 $65.00 $204.00 $50.00 19.71 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 134.41

15 Nurse Storage Closet 15002x4 3-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic



1 20.0% 19 $3 $208.00 $65.00 $273.00 $50.00 33.07 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 33.60

3Classroom #109

(1995)2200





6Custodian Closet

(1995)1500




1 20.0% 14 $2 $200.00 $65.00 $265.00 $50.00 66.05 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 44.80

16 30002x2 2-Lamp 34w T12 U

Recessed Prismatic 2 72 1 0.07 216 Replace Fixture 2x2 Recessed LED 38w 1 38 1 0.04 114 0.03 102 $16 5


Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 23 $4 $150.00 $65.00 $215.00 $50.00 10.44 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 70.74




0 20.0% 86 $13 $600.00 $195.00 $795.00 $150.00 33.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

16 30002x2 2-Lamp 34w T12 U

Recessed Prismatic 2 72 1 0.07 216 Replace Fixture 2x2 Recessed LED 38w 1 38 1 0.04 114 0.03 102 $16 5


Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 23 $4 $150.00 $65.00 $215.00 $50.00 10.44 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 70.74




0 20.0% 86 $13 $600.00 $195.00 $795.00 $150.00 33.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

17Classroom #115

(1995)2200


4 114 12 1.37 3,010 Replace Fixture 2x4 Recessed LED 64w 1 64 12 0.77 1,690 0.60 1,320 $205 4



17Classroom #114

(1995)2200





18Classroom #110

(1995)2200

2x4 4-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Parabolic




17Classroom #111

(1995)2200





17Classroom #112

(1995)1000


4 114 12 1.37 1,368 Replace Fixture 2x4 Recessed LED 64w 1 64 12 0.77 768 0.60 600 $93 4



17Classroom #113

(1995)2200





19Storage #128

(2004)1500




2 20.0% 144 $22 $2,000.00 $650.00 $2,650.00 $500.00 66.05 $400.00 $100.00 $500.00 FALSE 22.40

19Custodian Closet

(2004)1000




1 20.0% 19 $3 $400.00 $130.00 $530.00 $100.00 99.08 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 33.60

2Boy's Restroom

(2004)3000




1 20.0% 72 $11 $834.00 $390.00 $1,224.00 $300.00 7.89 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 22.40

2 Girl's Retroom (2004) 30002x2 2-Lamp 32w T8 U-6"

Recessed Prismatic2 62 6 0.37 1,116 Replace Fixture 2x2 Recessed LED 20w 1 20 6 0.12 360 0.25 756 $117 5


Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 72 $11 $834.00 $390.00 $1,224.00 $300.00 7.89 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 22.40



Kitchen (1975)


ECM #2 - T8 to LED

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback



20 Gymnasium 10008-Lamp 42w CFL High-

Bay8 336 24 8.06 8,064 Existing to Remain No Change 8 336 0 8.06 8,064 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

15 Gym Rear Exit 26002x4 3-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic


15 Gym Office #129 26002x4 3-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic



1 20.0% 67 $10 $416.00 $130.00 $546.00 $100.00 19.08 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 7.75

2 26002x2 2-Lamp 32w T8 U-6"

Recessed Prismatic2 62 1 0.06 161 Replace Fixture 2x2 Recessed LED 20w 1 20 1 0.02 52 0.04 109 $17 6


Switch Mnt.1 20.0% 10 $2 $139.00 $65.00 $204.00 $50.00 9.10 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 62.03

14 26002' 2-Lamp 17w T8 Wall Mount Wrap


21 2600 18w CFL Shower Light 1 18 1 0.02 47 Existing to Remain No Change 1 18 0 0.02 47 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

22 Stage 1000250w Metal Halide High-

Bay1 295 2 0.59 590 Replace Fixture

3-Lamp T5HO High-Bay Fixture


17 Music Room #132 22002x4 4-Lamp 32w T8 Recessed Prismatic






23 32002-Lamp 32w T8 Steel

Truss Pendant 2 66 14 0.92 2,957 Remove

Demo and Dispose use existing recessed lighting





Powerpack - Remote Mnt.3 20.0% 532 $83 $2,704.00 $845.00 $3,549.00 $650.00 15.50 $900.00 $150.00 $1,050.00 FALSE 12.72




Powerpack - Remote Mnt.3 20.0% 768 $119 $5,000.00 $1,625.00 $6,625.00 $1,250.00 30.96 $900.00 $150.00 $1,050.00 FALSE 8.82

24Hallway 1975-1955

Section3200

2x2 2-Lamp 17w T8 Recessed Opaque w/

Reflector2 33 19 0.63 2,006 Replace Fixture 2x2 Recessed LED 20w 1 20 19 0.38 1,216 0.25 790 $123 4


Powerpack - Remote Mnt.4 20.0% 243 $38 $2,641.00 $1,235.00 $3,876.00 $950.00 23.88 $1,200.00 $200.00 $1,400.00 FALSE 37.14

91955 Storage Closet

A1500 60w Incandescent A-Lamp 1 60 1 0.06 90 Re-Lamp Phillips A19 12.5w LED Lamp 1 12.5 1 0.01 19 0.05 71 $11 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $27.00 $16.25 $43.25 $20.00 2.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

25 1955 Storage Closet B 1500 36w CFL Medium Base 1 36 1 0.04 54 Existing to Remain No Change 1 36 0 0.04 54 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

91955 Large Storage

Closet 1500 60w Incandescent A-Lamp 1 60 1 0.06 90 Re-Lamp Phillips A19 12.5w LED Lamp 1 12.5 1 0.01 19 0.05 71 $11 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $27.00 $16.25 $43.25 $20.00 2.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

16Men's Faculty Toilet

(1995)1200




1 20.0% 9 $1 $150.00 $65.00 $215.00 $50.00 26.09 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 70.74

16Women's Faculty

Toilet (1995)1200




1 20.0% 9 $1 $150.00 $65.00 $215.00 $50.00 26.09 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 70.74

25Hallway Drink

Fountain (1995)3200 36w CFL Medium Base 1 36 1 0.04 115 Existing to Remain No Change 1 36 0 0.04 115 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 40008" Recessed Can 70w HID

Metal Halide1 92 2 0.18 736 Re-lamp & Bypass ballast



27 400015w CFL Up/Down

Wall Mount Spot Lights 1 15 4 0.06 240 Existing to Remain No Change 1 15 0 0.06 240 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

28Exterior - '55

Entrance4000



28Exterior - '55

Classroom Exit4000



28Exterior - '75 Cafeteria Exit

40006" Square Recessed 15w

CFL1 15 1 0.02 60 Existing to Remain No Change 1 15 0 0.02 60 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

9Exterior - '55 Boiler

Room Exit4000 60w Incandescent A-Lamp 1 60 1 0.06 240 Re-Lamp Phillips A19 12.5w LED Lamp 1 12.5 1 0.01 50 0.05 190 $29 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $27.00 $16.25 $43.25 $20.00 0.79 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




30 4000 100w HPS Wallpak 1 116 1 0.12 464 Replace Fixture 26w LED Wall Pack 1 26 1 0.03 104 0.09 360 $56 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $200.00 $150.00 $350.00 $100.00 4.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


Rear Exit #124000





Rear Exit #134000




30 Exterior - '04 4000 100w HPS Wallpak 1 116 5 0.58 2,320 Replace Fixture 26w LED Wall Pack 1 26 5 0.13 520 0.45 1,800 $279 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,000.00 $750.00 $1,750.00 $500.00 4.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


Side Exit #184000




Gym Office Restroom

Gym Lobby

Exterior - '95 Entrance

Exterior - '04 Gym Hall Rear Exit #11


ECM #2 - T8 to LED

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback






31 40009" Recessed 100w Metal

Halide 1 122 4 0.49 1,952 Re-lamp & Bypass ballast



30 Exterior 4000 100w HPS Wallpak 1 116 2 0.23 928 Replace Fixture 26w LED Wall Pack 1 26 2 0.05 208 0.18 720 $112 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $400.00 $300.00 $700.00 $200.00 4.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

32 Exterior - Pole Lamps 4000250w Pole Mounted

Shoebox HPS Type III1 302 3 0.91 3,624 Replace Fixture Head RAB 78w LED Area Light 1 78 3 0.23 936 0.67 2,688 $417 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $2,250.00 $450.00 $2,700.00 $525.00 5.22 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

TOTAL 587 49 108,407 546 34 70,016 15 38,391 $5,951 68 12 10,546 $1,635 $103,410 $35,393 $138,803 $26,925 18.80 $14,600 $3,400 $18,000 $135.00 $10.93

Exterior - '04 Main Entry




APPENDIX F

Appendix FPage 1 of 2

Location Description

Area (Sq FT) Panel Qty

Panel Sq Ft

Panel Total Sq

FtTotal KWDC

Total Annual kWh

Total KWAC

Panel Weight

(41.9 lbs) W/SQFT

Estell Manor School 9730SHARP

ND-240QCJ397 17.5 6,964 95.28 115,836 77.2 16,634 13.68

= Proposed PV Roof Layout

Notes:1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.

Appendix FPage 2 of 2

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Estell Manor School

Location: Estell Manor, NJDescription: Photovoltaic System 100% Financing - 15 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $425,787Annual kWh Production 115,836

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $17,955Average Annual SREC Revenue $22,134

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 15 Financing %: 100%

Discount Rate: 3% Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.155 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Financing Rate: 6.00% Average SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.191Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash Cumulative

Cash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow0 $0 0 0 0 $0 0 0 0 01 $0 115,836 $17,955 $0 $28,959 $25,056 $18,060 $3,797 $3,7972 $0 115,257 $18,493 $0 $28,814 $23,942 $19,174 $4,191 $7,9883 $0 114,681 $19,048 $0 $28,670 $22,759 $20,357 $4,602 $12,5904 $0 114,107 $19,619 $0 $28,527 $21,504 $21,613 $5,030 $17,6205 $0 113,537 $20,208 $1,169 $28,384 $20,171 $22,946 $4,306 $21,9266 $0 112,969 $20,814 $1,164 $22,594 $18,756 $24,361 ($872) $21,0547 $0 112,404 $21,439 $1,158 $22,481 $17,253 $25,863 ($355) $20,7008 $0 111,842 $22,082 $1,152 $22,368 $15,658 $27,459 $182 $20,8819 $0 111,283 $22,744 $1,146 $22,257 $13,964 $29,152 $738 $21,620

10 $0 110,726 $23,427 $1,140 $16,609 $12,166 $30,950 ($4,221) $17,39811 $0 110,173 $24,129 $1,135 $16,526 $10,257 $32,859 ($3,596) $13,80312 $0 109,622 $24,853 $1,129 $16,443 $8,231 $34,886 ($2,949) $10,85413 $0 109,074 $25,599 $1,123 $16,361 $6,079 $37,038 ($2,280) $8,57414 $0 108,528 $26,367 $1,118 $10,853 $3,794 $39,322 ($7,015) $1,55915 $0 107,986 $27,158 $1,112 $10,799 $1,369 $41,747 ($6,272) ($4,713)

Totals: 1,678,024 $333,936 $12,547 $320,645 $220,959 $425,787 ($4,713) -Net Present Value (NPV)

Photovoltaic System 100% Financing - 15 year

10.62

$1,617



APPENDIX G

The ESP Calculator TM

Toll Free : 1-800-747-9627 or (905) 791-1493 Energy Savings Payback CalculatorProject Description Estell Manor SchoolDate 6-Feb-14

Data Entry QTY kVA15

1 302 451 75

112.51502253005007501000150020007.5

Available Full Load kW 195Average kVA (calc) 49equipment operating hrs/ day 12equipment operating days/yr 235 Calc Load kW Calc Annual kWhLoad during normal operating hours 55% 107 302,445 Load outside operating hours 20% 39 231,660

Total Annual Load kWh: 534,105 Annual Cost to Operate Load OnlykWh rate 0.155$ Annual Consumption: 82,786$ demand rate ($/kW/mo) ex. $10.00 $0.00 Annual Demand: -$

Total Cost to run load 82,786$

Annual Cost of Status Quo Transformer Losses & Associated Air Conditioning (A/C) burdenNameplate Linear efficiency (normal op hrs) 96.5% % electronics or current THD 10.0%Calculated operating efficiency 96.2%Transformer kW Losses (Normal Operation) 4.3 kWStatus quo Efficiency (Outside op. hrs) 95.0%Transformer kW Losses (Outside op. hrs) 2.1 kWAnnual addititional kWh from transformers 24,303 kWhAnnual Cost of Transformer Losses 3,767$

A/C System Performance (kW/ton) - Additional Tons of Cooling (on peak) - tonsAnnual addititional kWh from A/C - kWhAnnual Cost of Associated A/C -$

Summary with Status Quo TransformerAnnual Cost of feeding Building Load 82,786$ Annual Cost of Transformer Losses 3,767$ Annual Cost of Associated A/C -$ Electrical Bill (Status Quo Transformer) 86,553$

IMPORTANT: By using the ESP Calculator™, you are agreeing the TERMS OF USE section on page 3Powersmiths International Corp. is a licensed user. Content subject to change without noticePage 1 of 3 © Power Quality Institute 1998-2007, All rights reserved doc#807-000440-110-A05 17-Jan-09

Transformers on Project


Toll Free : 1-800-747-9627 or (905) 791-1493 Energy Savings Payback Calculator

Using Powersmiths instead of status quo transformersPowersmiths Efficiency (Normal Operation) 98.6%Powersmiths kW Losses (Normal Operation) 1.5 kWPowersmiths Efficiency (Outside op. hrs) 97.6%Transformer kW Losses (Outside op. hrs) 1.0 kWAnnual addititional kWh from transformers 9,991 kWhAnnual Cost of Powersmiths Losses 1,549$

Additional Tons of Cooling (on peak) - tons Annual addititional kWh from A/C - kWhAnnual Cost of Associated A/C -$

Comparing Status Quo & PowersmithsStatus Quo Powersmiths

Annual Cost of feeding Building Load 82,786$ 82,786$ Annual Cost of Transformer Losses 3,767$ 1,549$ Annual Cost of Associated A/C -$ -$ ReductionAnnual estimated Electrical Bill 86,553$ 84,335$ 3%

Peak kW reduction (normal op hours) 2.8 kWAnnual kWh reduction 14,312 kWhReduction in Air Conditioning Load (on peak) - tons

Cost Analysis (calc)

Energy Cost Escalation (above inflation) 2.0%

Annual Power Quality Benefit -$

AnnualOperating Cost 20 years 32 years

Status Quo Transformers $3,767 $111,950 $227,168Powersmiths Transformers $1,549 $46,022 $93,388Savings with Powersmiths $2,218 $65,928 $133,780

Cost CostPowersmiths Transformers $30,000Status Quo Transformers $0

Payback on total cost 13.52 years current kWh rate:Cost of Energy Savings 0.066$ /kWh $0.155Cost - Benefit Ratio 2.4 times less to save a kWh than to buy a kWh

Leasing Option 60 Month Term 48 Month Term 36 Month TermTotal Annual Leasing Payments $7,585 $9,252 $11,772Net Annual Cost with savings $5,367 $7,034 $9,554

Summary of Environmental Benefits

11 tons of CO2 2 Acres trees planted34 tons of Coal 1 Car Emissions83 kgs of SO2 1 homes heated36 kgs of NOx

IMPORTANT: By using the ESP Calculator™, you are agreeing the TERMS OF USE section on page 3Powersmiths International Corp. is a licensed user. Content subject to change without noticePage 2 of 3 © Power Quality Institute 1998-2007, All rights reserved doc#807-000440-110-A05 17-Jan-09

Life Cycle Operating Cost & Savings

Annual Reduction in Greenhouse Gases (per EPA) Equivalence


Toll Free : 1-800-747-9627 or (905) 791-1493 Energy Savings Payback CalculatorStatus Quo Transformer (Normal Operation)Enter the average efficiency of the transformers. While NEMA TP1 is legislated minimum efficiency, it only applies at a single 35% load point, and under ideal linear load profile. Since most transformers are much less loaded than 35%, be sure to use lower efficiency to reflect load level.Status Quo Transformer (Outside Op. hours)Transformer efficiency is typically lower than normal when lightly loaded (86-89% when 10-15% loaded for most sizes) % electronics or Current THDIEEE Std 1100 and other industry references document transformer losses can more than double when feeding electronicswhen installled compared to ideal linear load in a manufacturer's factory test.Transformer Operating LossesTransformer Losses = kW load/net efficiency - kW load. A/C Performance (kW/ton)Varies widely depending on age and technology of cooling system. As low as 0.5 to over 2kW/ton (1.25-1.5 is often tp)Unlike most substation transformers that are vented to the exterior, most building distribution transformers are ventilated within the building, and their heat losses therefore add to the cooling load.Powersmiths Efficiency (Normal Operation) & (Outside Op. hours)Available on Powersmiths product data sheetEnergy Cost escalation (above inflation)

It is well recognized that energy rates are increasing much faster than inflation. Enter the % over inflationAnnual Power Quality BenefitSavings attributable to reduced downtime, equipment locks & failures associated with poor power qualityCostCost of transformers. Enter dollar figure for transformers under consideration. If the interest is to look at the justification for replacing existing transformers, enter $0 in the conventional transformer cost field.Energy Operating Cost Energy OPERATING COST (normal op) = (transformer + cooling) kW losses x kWh rate x hrs/day x days/yr + demand chargeDemand charge is not included in the calculation of losses outside normal hours to be conservative.Return on Investment (ROI)ROI on Incremental Cost is based on dividing the Incremental Investment in Powersmiths by the Annual SavingsROI on Total Transformer Cost is based on dividing the Total Transformer Cost by the Annual SavingsCost of Energy SavingsIn its simplest form, the cost of energy savings represents the cost to savea kWh as opposed to paying for it according to the prevailing kWh rate.

The equation is: Cost of Energy Savings = (Incremental Product Cost / Lifetime kWh saved)LeasingPowersmiths Leasing has many benefits, including avoiding the use of capital, offsetting monthly leasing payment withthe reduction in monthly energy bill from using PowersmithsEnvironmental BenefitsConversion rates from kWh to emission reduction and equivalent benefits are published by the EPA, and reflect environmental benefits derived from reduced emissions associated with reduced power generation.TERMS OF USEPower Quality Institute has used its best efforts in developing the ESP Calculator ™ with the intent of providing an easyto use and useful calculation tool. However, data entered and assumptions made may not accurately reflect all variablesthat apply in a given facility. The results are therefore estimates only and may differ from actual measurements.The user is responsible for evaluating the suitability and accuracy of the ESP Calculator ™. The Power Quality Instituteand Powersmiths International Corp. make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy orcompleteness of the estimates generated by the ESP Calculator ™ and specifically disclaim any implied warranties ofmerchantability or fitness for any particular purpose and shall in no event be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damage, including, but not limited to special, incidental, consequential or other damages.Page 3 of 3 © Power Quality Institute 1998-2007, All rights reserved doc#807-000440-110-A05 17-Jan-09

PREPARED FOR ESTELL MANOR S DISTRICT CAPE M A ESTELL A R … · This audit is performed in...

Documents

Transcript of PREPARED FOR ESTELL MANOR S DISTRICT CAPE M A ESTELL A R … · This audit is performed in...