Prepared by Developing higher education programs between international and national standards Dr....
-
Upload
tracy-derick-cain -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Prepared by Developing higher education programs between international and national standards Dr....
Prepared by
Developing higher education programs
between international and national standards
Dr. Mohammed H. Abu- Rasain
Dr.Rafik ElbarbaryDean , Faculty Of
EducationSupervisor , quality unit
NCAAA REMMBER (2003) BRITH DATE
1.Mission and Objectives2.Governance and Administration3.Management of Quality Assurance
and Improvement4.Learning and Teaching5.Student Administration and Support
Services6.Learning Resources7.Facilities and Equipment8.Financial Planning and Management9.Faculty and Staff Employment
Processes10.Research11.Institutional Relationships With the
Community
Where Is The Gap
1-Weak linkage between education output systemic pre university and higher education institutions.
2 -Lack of interest in higher education admission policies by developing specifications and standards for admission to the colleges of education programs on academic, cultural, social and psychological health .
3 -Lack of clear and precise data to official government circles about the needs of the community surrounding the College of education in the light of identification of programmes that are consistent with labour market needs
Proposals for development programmes
-Developing the conceptual framework for programmes through the formulation and preparation of the mission and
objectives reflecting his upbringing and the preparation of national policies and directions of the Ministry of higher
education and the nature &characteristics of community skills, knowledge and attitudes that the program seeks to achieve.
- Establishment of levels of program planning in large scale and medium and short are consecutive , cumulative paths ,
control methodology ,implementation processes
Learning outcomes for bachelor degree programs in teacher education
Expectations for learning outcomes for all bachelor degree graduates ( source: consultation document NCAAA march (2010)
Learning outcomes for bachelor degree programs in teacher education
1- Specific knowledge learning outcomes for bachelor degree programs in teacher education .
1- Specific knowledge learning outcomes for bachelor degree programs in teacher education .- Breadth And Depth Of Subject Content Sufficient To
Enable Them To Teach The Curriculum Appropriate For The Elementary ,Intermediate ,Secondary Phases
- Current theories in education
- Child And Adolescent Development Of That Knowledge For Their Work As A Teacher
- A Variety of teaching methods in order to meet the needs of individual students
- The structure and organization of the saudia education system
Learning outcomes programs programs in teacher education:
2- Specific Cognitive Skill Outcomes- Use skills of inquiry ,critical analysis, and synthesis to develop their knowledge - Use research and evidence to support their work as teacher.- Develop lesson and program plans that provide well-structured ,sequenced ,learning experiences to ensure progress for their students- Deliver lessons that support active learning
3- interpersonal skills and responsibility
- Take responsibility for their own learning and continuing personal and professional development- Work effectively in groups and exercise
leadership- Act responsibly in personal and professional relationships- Act ethically and consistently with high moral standard in personal and public forms.- Cooperate and contribute as constructive members of teams in schools- Posses the leadership and classroom management skills to maintain a cooperative and constructive
4- Specific communication ,information technology and numerical skills
- Use appropriate, a accurate, grammatically correct written and oral communication- Be able to apply these effective oral and written skills- Use new and emerging information and communication technologies
- Use data and statistical information to benchmark the progress of learners against local and national norms