Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project...

18
CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 1 Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R Green and Roelof Van Silfhout

Transcript of Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project...

Page 1: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 1Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering

Preparation for Group Project Work –A Structured Approach

Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott

Peter R Green and Roelof Van Silfhout

Page 2: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 2Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Background

• Embedded Systems Project (ESP)– Major 2nd year student-centred activity – first

introduced in 2004-05.

– Students work in small teams of 4 to 5 throughout semester 2.

– Design and build a microcontroller-based product.

• Evaluation– Students encountered a number of problems in

carrying out their first team project.

Page 3: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 3Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Aims of the EBL Project

• To develop student skills in:– Team working

– Project planning

– Group presentations

• Structured series of EBL activities:– Organised as part of semester 1 tutorial scheme

– Group sessions facilitated by tutors

– Tutors monitor and assess student progress

Page 4: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 4Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

EBL Scenario

• Based on a hypothetical decorative tile company, Baked Earth.

• The company has become aware of inconsistencies in the quality of a new high-temperature glaze.

• Working in partnership with Euro-Tunnel Kilns to find solutions to the problem.

• Need to measure temperature profile in the kiln using portable temperature sensors.

• Agency for Consultancy in Electronics (ACE) has been commissioned to design the electronics.

Page 5: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 5Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

The Problems• Problem 1

– Design a circuit for a thermistor sensor to interface with a PIC microcontroller system

• Problem 2– Review the choice of sensor –

thermocouples

• Problem 3– Produce a viable project plan

• Problem 4– Redesign the sensor amplifier –

practical considerations

• Problem 5– Prepare a group presentation

Page 6: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 6Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Euro-Tunnel Kilns - Gehenna Series

1300°C

25°CTemperature Profile Through Kiln

70m

Cool air is drawn into the kiln and is heated by the cooling tiles.

Gas Burners

The heated air is then used for the combustion of the gas in the burners

Hot air pre-heats incoming tiles, then is expelled through exhaust duct.

Tiles with unfired glaze are stacked in racks on the kiln car

Tiles are pre-heated by exhaust air

The glaze is fired

Tiles are cooled by incoming air

Kiln cars move slowly through the kiln, taking 4 hours to complete their journey.

Page 7: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 7Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Euro-Tunnel Kilns:

GehennaKiln Car

Kiln car base

Kiln WallLayers of Insulating Materials

Kiln Temperature 1300°C

Under-car Temperature

~100°C

Sand Seal Plate

Sand Seal

GlazedTiles

Kiln Furniture:In this case a rack for holding the tiles, a metal skeleton covered in a ceramic.

Low Thermal Mass materials require less energy to be heated,allowing more energy to go into heating the ceramic or glaze.

Page 8: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 8Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Student (& Staff!) Support

• Supporting Documents– Problem sheet

summaries

– SEEERS Guides

– Tutor cover notes and supplementary material

• Supporting Lectures– Introduction

– Searching skills

– Working in groups

– Project planning

– Presentation skills

• SEEERS Guides to:– Second Year Tutorials– Manchester Steps– Small Group and Team Work– Searching for Information– Project Planning– Group Presentations– The Marking Scheme

Page 9: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 9Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Manchester Steps

Make the problem explicitAssess existing knowledgeNeed to knowCourse of actionHome in on resourcesEnquiries and/or ExperimentShare resultsTheoriseEvaluateReport, Repeat, Refine, Reflect

ST

EP

S

Page 10: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 10Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

The Story So Far ….

• Teams met with tutors every two weeks– Tutors assess individual student performance

– Marks do not count towards end of year assessment

– Attendance has been patchy – declining as weeks go by

• Student feedback– Some areas need attention, but overall experience is positive.

– Presentations particularly valuable.

– They value the team working component.

– Insight into the complexities of a real project (harder than labs).

• Tutor feedback– Students are talking about technical issues outside class.

– A very valuable activity.

Page 11: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 11Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Evaluation Method: Integrative Evaluation

… combining a number of evaluation tools to gain insight on the students learning experience …

• Confidence Logs

• Student Process Questionnaire

• Learning Resource Questionnaire

• Perceptions of PBL

• Post Course Questionnaire

• Focus Groups– Mid-way through SYT

– End of SYT

– End of Team Project (ESP)

Page 12: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 12Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Evaluation Results: Quantitative

• Increase in confidence in all areas – except presentations

• Study Process Questionnaire (0-50)– Deep Learning Attitude (28.3)– Surface Learning Attitude (22.9)

• Learning Resources– Wide range, Internet primarily– Discussions with students and staff also high

• Perceptions of PBL– Positive despite recognising more time and responsibility– Generally happy with the level of support– Still preferred lectures

• Attendance– Dropped 92% ⇒ 45%

Page 13: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 13Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Evaluation Results: Post Course Questionnaire

What did you learn from SYT?

• Team Working

• Project Planning and Management Problem Solving

• Presentation

• Research

What did you not like about the SYT?

• Not marked

• Competing workloads

• Some – dysfunctional teams

Other Comments

• Some – supported the initiative

• A few – use tutorials in a different way

What would you like to see changed about the SYT?

• Adding Marks

• Reducing Workload

• Better Teamwork

Page 14: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 14Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Evaluation Results: Qualitative

• Students: Focus Groups – Lack of support for Plan a Project problem– “We need a lecture on <blank> before we can do it.”– Need for marks– Competing workloads– Build a Circuit problem introducing a sample circuit broke

validity of project– Wanted to see a project to completion– Problems with team working

• Staff: Feedback– Worthwhile, high quality activity– Needs Credit – danger of bad habits carrying over

Page 15: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 15Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

What next … (i)

• Adding Credit– Increase student (& staff) commitment

• Fine Tune Problems– More support for the Project Planning & MS Project

– Improve the flow of problems, especially Problem 4

– Balancing workload with other coursework

– More structure\guidance on dividing problems (tutor notes)

Page 16: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 16Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

What next … (ii)

• Restructure Problems to be closer to ESP Project– Plan a Project

– Choose a Sensor

– Design a Circuit

– Build a Circuit

– Prepare a Presentation

Page 17: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 17Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

What next … (iii)

Support Teamwork• Opening Workshop

– Introduce Teamwork, its importance and some tools

• Management Report– Record team processes

– Reflect on process

• Closing Workshop– Present Management Report

– Reflect on what they learnt

Page 18: Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach€¦ · Preparation for Group Project Work – A Structured Approach Peter Hicks, Norman Powell, Bill Truscott Peter R

CEEBL Symposium 30/6/06 18Combining the strengths of UMIST andThe Victoria University of Manchester

Thank you …

Acknowledgements

HEFCE Curriculum Innovation FundHigher Education Funding Council for England

IET Academic and Industrial AccreditationInstitute of Engineering and Technology

CEEBL www.manchester.ac.uk/ceeblCentre for Excellence in Enquiry-Based Learning

HEFCE: CETLs ProgrammeCentre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning