Premier Systems v. Shah et. al.

7/29/2019 Premier Systems v. Shah et. al.

1/115

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michael K. Friedland (State Bar No. 157,217)[email protected] S. Razai (State Bar No. 246,922)[email protected] Y. Hsu (State Bar No. 285,853)[email protected]

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 Main Street, Fourteenth FloorIrvine, CA 92614Telephone: (949) 760-0404Facsimile: (949) 760-9502

Attorneys for PlaintiffPREMIER SYSTEMS USA, INC. D/B/A OLLOCLIP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PREMIER SYSTEMS USA, INC. d/b/aOLLOCLIP, a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.DHARMESH SHAH A.K.A. DAVID

SHAH d/b/a SOURCE VISTA, an

individual, and LIVINGSOCIAL,

INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendants.

)))))

)))))))))))))

Civil Action No.

COMPLAINT FOR PATENTINFRINGEMENT, TRADEDRESS INFRINGEMENT,

FALSE DESIGNATION OFORIGIN, AND UNFAIRCOMPETITION

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

'13CV2281 NAJB


2/115

- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Premier Systems USA, Inc. d/b/a Olloclip (Olloclip) hereby complains

of Defendants Dharmesh Shah a.k.a. David Shah d/b/a Source Vista (Source

Vista) and LivingSocial, Inc. (LivingSocial) (collectively Defendants) and

alleges as follows:

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

1. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the claimsin this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338 because Olloclips claims

for patent infringement, trade dress infringement, false designation of origin,

and unfair competition pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271 and 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)

arise under the laws of the United States. This Court has supplemental

jurisdiction over the claims that arise under state statutory and common law

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a) because the state law claims are so related to

the federal claims that they form part of the same case or controversy and derive

from a common nucleus of operative facts.

2. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants becauseDefendants have a continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this

judicial district, and by committing acts of patent infringement, trade dress

infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition in this judicial

district, including but not limited to selling infringing products directly to

consumers and/or retailers in this district and selling into the stream of

commerce knowing such products would be sold in California and this district,

which acts form a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to

Olloclips claims.

3. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c)and 1400(a) and (b).

THE PARTIES

4. Plaintiff Olloclip is a corporation organized and existing under thelaws of the State of California, having its principal place of business at 16291


3/115

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gothard Street, Huntington Beach, California 92647.

5. Olloclip is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, thatDefendant Dharmesh Shah a.k.a. David Shah does business as Source Vista

(Source Vista) with a principal place of business at 5316 Ambergate Lane,

Dallas, Texas 75287.

6. Olloclip is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, thatSource Vista operates the website www.sourcevista.com.

7. Olloclip is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, thatDefendant LivingSocial, Inc. (LivingSocial) is a corporation organized and

existing under the law of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of

business at 1445 New York Ave. NW, Suite 200, Washington, D.C. 20005.

8. Olloclip is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, thatLivingSocial operates the website www.livingsocial.com.

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

9. Olloclip designs and sells quick-connect lens attachments for smartphone cameras, specifically for various models of the Apple iPhone

(Olloclip Lens).

10. The Olloclip Lens offers the combination of a fisheye lens, a wide-angle lens, and a macro lens in one compact unit that is easily attachable and fits

in a persons pocket.

11. Olloclip was launched in 2011 and designs and manufactures theOlloclip Lens at its headquarters in Huntington Beach, California.

12. As a result of its highly acclaimed, innovative lens design andtechnology, Olloclip has grown at an impressive pace and is now the best-

selling smart phone camera lens attachment in the world.

13. Olloclip diligently protects its intellectual property rights in its lenstechnology as well as its valuable patents and trademarks both in the U.S. and

abroad.


4/115

- 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

14. Olloclips innovative designs and technology in the Olloclip Lensare also protected by design and utility patents, including United States Design

Patent No. D678,379 (the D379 Patent) and United States Patent No.

8,279,544 (the 544 Patent).

15. On March 19, 2013, the U.S.P.T.O duly and lawfully issued theD379 Patent, entitled LENS COMPONENT. Olloclip is the owner by

assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D379 Patent. A true and correct

copy of the D379 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

16. On October 2, 2012, the U.S.P.T.O duly and lawfully issued the544 Patent, entitled SELECTIVELY ATTACHABLE AND REMOVABLE

LENSES FOR COMMUNICATION DEVICES. Olloclip is the owner by

assignment of all right, title, and interest in the 544 Patent. A true and correct

copy of the 544 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.

17. Olloclip provides the public with constructive notice of its patentrights pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 287.

18. The Olloclip Lens bears a unique and distinctive trade dress in theoverall design of the product (Product Trade Dress). The Product Trade Dress

as a whole does not affect the cost or quality of the Olloclip Lens or serve any

functional purpose, and it is not the only option for the design of a clip-on lens.

An example of the Product Trade Dress is depicted below.


5/115

- 4 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

19. As a result of Olloclips widespread use and display of the ProductTrade Dress in association with its Olloclip lens, (a) the public has come to

recognize and identify products bearing the Product Trade Dress as emanating

from Olloclip, (b) the public recognizes that products bearing the Product Trade

Dress constitute high quality products that conform to the specifications created

by Olloclip, and that (c) the Product Trade Dress has established strong

secondary meaning and extensive goodwill.

20. Olloclip sells its Olloclip Lens in packaging that bears a unique anddistinctive trade dress consisting of the overall image of its packaging as formed

by white and red lettering on black packaging and a circular transparent window

on the front of the packaging through which the product is displayed

(Packaging Trade Dress). The Packaging Trade Dress as a whole does not

affect the cost or quality of the Olloclip Lens or serve any functional purpose,

and it is not the only option for packaging a clip-on lens. An example of the

Packaging Trade Dress is depicted below.

21. As a result of Olloclips widespread use and display of thePackaging Trade Dress in association with its Olloclip lens, (a) the public has

come to recognize and identify products bearing the Packaging Trade Dress as

emanating from Olloclip, (b) the public recognizes that products bearing the

Packaging Trade Dress constitute high quality products that conform to the

specifications created by Olloclip, and (c) the Packaging Trade Dress has


6/115

- 5 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

established strong secondary meaning and extensive goodwill.

22. Defendants manufacture, use, sell, offer for sale and/or import intothe United States lens attachments for smart phone camera lenses under the

brands Source Vista 3-Piece Lens KitandInner Eye iPhone Camera Lens Set or

3 Macro (Accused Products) that infringe Olloclips intellectual property

rights.

23. On August 28, 2013, Olloclip sent Defendants a cease and desistletter requesting that Defendants cease the infringement of Olloclips 544

Patent, D379 Patent, and the Packaging Trade Dress.

24. Olloclip requested that Defendants cancel any pending sales of theAccused Products. Defendants never responded to this request.

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Patent Infringement)

(35 U.S.C. 271)

25. Olloclip repeats and realleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1through 24 of the Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

26. This is a claim for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271.27. Defendants, through their agents, employees and servants, have,

and continue to, knowingly, intentionally and willfully directly infringe, engage

in acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the D379

Patent by directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering for sale

and/or importing products into the United States that are covered by the claim of

the D379 Patent, including, for example, Defendants Accused Products.

28. Defendants acts of infringement of the D379 Patent wereundertaken without permission or license from Olloclip. Defendants had actual

and/or constructive knowledge of the D379 Patent, and their actions constitute

willful and intentional infringement of the D379 Patent. Defendants infringed

the D379 Patent with reckless disregard of Olloclips patent rights. Defendants


7/115

- 6 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendants should have known, that their

actions constituted infringement of the D379 Patent. Defendants acts of

infringement of the D379 Patent were not consistent with the standards of

commerce for their industry.

29. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants infringement of theD379 Patent, Defendants have derived and received gains, profits, and

advantages in an amount not presently known to Olloclip.

30. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289, Olloclip is entitled to Defendantstotal profits from Defendants infringement of the D379 Patent.

31. Defendants, through their agents, employees and servants, have,and continue to, knowingly, intentionally and willfully directly infringe, engage

in acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the 544

Patent by directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering for sale

and/or importing products into the United States that are covered by at least

Claim 1 of the 544 Patent, including, for example, Defendants Accused

Products.

32. Defendants acts of infringement of the 544 Patent wereundertaken without permission or license from Olloclip. Defendants had actual

and/or constructive knowledge of the 544 Patent, and their actions constitute

willful and intentional infringement of the 544 Patent. Defendants infringed

the 544 Patent with reckless disregard of Olloclips patent rights. Defendants

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendants should have known, that their

actions constituted infringement of the 544 Patent. Defendants acts of

infringement of the 544 Patent were not consistent with the standards of

commerce for their industry.

33. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants infringement of the544 Patent, Defendants have derived and received gains, profits, and

advantages in an amount that is not presently known to Olloclip.


8/115

- 7 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

34. Defendants will continue to directly and/or indirectly infringe the544 Patent to the great and irreparable injury of Olloclip, unless enjoined by

this Court.

35. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, Olloclip is entitled to damages forDefendants infringing acts and treble damages together with interest and costs

as fixed by this Court.

36. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285, Olloclip is entitled to reasonableattorneys fees for the necessity of bringing this claim.

37. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants patentinfringement, Olloclip has suffered and continues to suffer great and irreparable

injury, for which Olloclip has no adequate remedy at law.

38. Defendants will continue to infringe Olloclips patents, unlessenjoined by this Court.

SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Federal Trade Dress Infringement)

(15 U.S.C. 1125(a))

39. Olloclip repeats and realleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1through 38 of the Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

40. This is a claim for trade dress infringement under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

41. As a result of the widespread use and display of the PackagingTrade Dress, the trade dress has acquired secondary meaning to potential

purchasers, in that potential purchasers have come to associate the packaging for

the Olloclip lens bearing the overall design of the Packaging Trade Dress with

Olloclip.

42. Subsequent to Olloclips use and adoption of the Packaging TradeDress, Defendants have developed, advertised, and sold lens attachments for

smart phone camera lenses in packaging that uses trade dress that is confusingly


9/115

- 8 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

similar to the Packaging Trade Dress. For example, the packaging of

Defendants Inner Eye iPhone Camera Lens Set or 3 Macro product has the

overall packaging design of the Olloclip Trade Dress.

43. As a result of the widespread use and display of the Product TradeDress, the trade dress has acquired secondary meaning to potential purchasers,

in that potential purchasers have come to associate Olloclip lens bearing the

overall design of the Product Trade Dress with Olloclip.

44. Subsequent to Olloclips use and adoption of the Product TradeDress, Defendants have developed, advertised, and sold lens attachments for

smart phone camera lenses that use trade dress that is confusingly similar to the

Product Trade Dress. For example, DefendantsInner Eye iPhone Camera Lens

Set or 3 Macro product has the overall design of the Product Trade Dress.

45. Defendants use of these features in connection with its lensattachments for smart phone camera lenses is likely to cause confusion, or to

cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of

Defendants with Olloclip.

46. Upon information and belief, Defendants acts of trade dressinfringement were undertaken willfully with full knowledge of the falsity of

such designation of origin and false descriptions or representations, and with the

express intent to cause confusion, and to mislead and deceive the purchasing

public.

47. Olloclip is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, thatDefendants have derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,

gains, profits and advantages from Defendants trade dress infringement in an

amount that is not presently known to Olloclip. By reason of Defendants

actions, constituting trade dress infringement, Olloclip has been damaged and is

entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

/ / /


10/115

- 9 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

48. Due to Defendants actions, constituting trade dress infringement,Olloclip has suffered and continues to suffer great and irreparable injury, for

which Olloclip has no adequate remedy at law.

THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Federal Unfair Competition & False Designation of Origin)

(15 U.S.C. 1125(a))

49. Olloclip repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-48 ofthis Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

50. This is a claim for unfair competition and false designation oforigin arising under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

51. Defendants use of the Product Trade Dress and Packaging TradeDress without Olloclips consent constitutes a false designation of origin, false

or misleading description of fact or false or misleading representation of fact,

which is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the

affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as

to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods or commercial

activities by another person in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

52. Such conduct by Defendants is likely to confuse, mislead, anddeceive Defendants customers, purchasers, and members of the public as to the

origin of the Packaging Trade Dress and/or the Product Trade Dress, or cause

said persons to believe that Defendants and/or their products have been

sponsored, approved, authorized, or licensed by Olloclip or are in some way

affiliated or connected with Olloclip, all in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

53. Upon information and belief, Defendants actions were undertakenwillfully with full knowledge of the falsity of such designation of origin and

false descriptions or representations, and with the express intent to cause

confusion, and to mislead and deceive the purchasing public.


11/115

- 10 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

54. Defendants use of the Packaging Trade Dress and the ProductTrade Dress without Olloclips consent each constitutes unfair competition with

Olloclip.


gains, profits and advantages from Defendants false designation of origin, false

or misleading description of fact or false or misleading representation of fact,

and unfair competition in an amount that is not presently known to Olloclip. By

reason of Defendants actions, constituting false designation of origin, false or

misleading description of fact or false or misleading representation of fact, and

unfair competition, Olloclip has been damaged and is entitled to monetary relief

in an amount to be determined at trial.

56. Due to Defendants actions, constituting false designation of origin,false or misleading description of fact or false or misleading representation of

fact, and unfair competition, Olloclip has suffered and continues to suffer great

and irreparable injury, for which Olloclip has no adequate remedy at law.

FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(California Statutory and Common Law Unfair Competition)

(Cal. Bus. & Prof. 17200, et seq.)

57. Olloclip repeats and re-alleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1through 56 of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

58. This is a claim for unfair competition, arising under CaliforniaBusiness & Professions Code 17200, et seq. and California common law.

59. Defendants acts of trade dress infringement and false designationof origin complained of herein constitute unfair competition with Olloclip under

the common law and statutory laws of the State of California, particularly

California Business & Professions Code 17200, et seq.

/ / /


12/115

- 11 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


gains, profits and advantages from Defendants unfair competition in an amount

that is not presently known to Olloclip.

61. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants wrongful acts asalleged in this Complaint, Olloclip has been damaged and is entitled to

monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

62. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants willful andmalicious actions, constituting unfair competition, Olloclip has suffered and

continues to suffer great and irreparable injury, for which Olloclip has no

adequate remedy at law and such irreparable injury will continue unless

Defendants are enjoined by this Court.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court award

Olloclip the following relief:

A. That Olloclips D379 Patent and 544 Patent each be deemed validand willfully infringed by Defendants under 35 U.S.C. 271;

B. That Defendants and their agents, servants, employees,representatives, successors, and assigns, and all persons, firms, or corporations

in active concert or participation with Defendants, be temporarily, preliminarily,

and permanently enjoined and restrained from directly or indirectly infringing

the D379 Patent or the 544 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271;

C. That Defendants account for all gains, profits, and advantagesderived by Defendants infringement of the D379 Patent and the 544 Patent in

violation of 35 U.S.C. 271, and that Defendants pay to Olloclip all damages

suffered by Olloclip as a result of Defendants infringement pursuant to 35

U.S.C. 284;

/ / /


13/115

- 12 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D. That Olloclip be awarded Defendants total profits from theinfringement of the D379 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289;

E. An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damagesbecause of Defendants willful patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284;

F. An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case warranting anaward to Olloclip of the attorneys fees and costs incurred by Olloclip in

connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285;

G. That Defendants and their agents, servants, employees,representatives, successors, and assigns, and all persons, firms, or corporations

in active concert or participation with Defendants, be temporarily, preliminarily,

and permanently enjoined and restrained from engaging in, and assisting or

inducing, directly or indirectly, others to engage in the following activities:

1. using the Product Trade Dress, the Packaging Trade Dress,or any other trade dress that is confusingly similar thereto;

2. falsely designating the origin of Defendants goods;3. unfairly competing with Olloclip in any manner whatsoever;4. causing a likelihood of confusion or injuries to Olloclips

business reputation;

5. manufacturing, using, displaying, distributing, or selling anyproducts that use trade dress that is confusingly similar to the

Product Trade Dress, or any other trade dress that is

confusingly similar thereto; and

6. manufacturing, using, displaying, distributing, or selling anyproducts in packaging that uses trade dress that is

confusingly similar to the Packaging Trade Dress, or any

other trade dress that is confusingly similar thereto.

H. That Defendants be adjudged to have competed unfairly withOlloclip under the common law of the State of California;


14/115

- 13 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I. That Defendants be adjudged to have competed unfairly withOlloclip under California Business & Professional Code 17200, and that

Defendants actions in so doing be adjudged willful and done knowingly;

J. That an accounting be ordered to determine Defendants profitsresulting from their infringement, false designation of origin and unfair

competition, and that Olloclip be awarded monetary relief in an amount to be

fixed by the Court in its discretion as it finds just as an equitable remedy and as

a remedy under 15 U.S.C. 1117 and Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200,

including:

1. all profits received by Defendants from sales and revenues ofany kind made as a result of its infringing actions, said

amount to be trebled;

2. all damages sustained by Olloclip as a result of Defendantsacts of infringement, unfair competition, and false

designation of origin, and that such damages be trebled; and

3. punitive damages stemming from Defendants willful,intentional, and malicious acts.

K. That Olloclip have and recover the costs of this civil action,including reasonable attorneys fees;

L. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs ofthis action against Defendants; and,

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /


15/115

- 14 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

M. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just andproper.

Respectfully submitted,

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

Dated: September 23, 2013 By: s/ Ali S. RazaiMichael K. FriedlandAli S. RazaiSamantha Y. Hsu

Attorneys for PlaintiffPREMIER SYSTEMS USA, INC. d/b/aOLLOCLIP


16/115

- 15 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff PREMIER SYSTEMS USA, INC. d/b/a OLLOCLIP hereby

demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

Respectfully submitted,

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

Dated:September 23, 2013 By: s/ Ali S. RazaiMichael K. FriedlandAli S. RazaiSamantha Y. Hsu

Attorneys for PlaintiffPREMIER SYSTEMS USA, INC. d/b/aOLLOCLIP

16268266

092013


17/115

Table of Exhibits

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TABLE OF EXHIBITS

Page #

Exhibit 1 ...................................................................................................................................16

Exhibit 2 ...................................................................................................................................58


18/115

EXHIBIT 1


19/115

USO0D678379S

( 1 2 ) United States Design Patent ( 1 0 ) P a t e n t N 0 . 2 US D 6 7 8 , 3 7 9 SO N e i l l e t a l . ( 4 5 ) Date o f P a t e n t : 4 * Mar. 1 9 , 2013

(54) LENSCOMPONENT D387,787 S * 12/1997 Palmer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/1305,831,778 A * 11/ 1998 .. 359/829*

( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : P a t r i c k O N e i l l , H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , CA "U$);Ch0I1gPak,LakeWOOd,CA(U$) 6 , 8 8 9 , 0 0 6 B2 5 / 2 0 0 5 K o b a y a s h iD546,863 S * 7/2007 I t o e t a1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/219

( 7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : Premier Systems USA, I n c . , Huntington 1 3 5 6 0 3 0 2 5 * 1 / 2 0 0 8 T O k i W a e t a 1 ~ ~ D 1 6 / 2 0 8Beach CA Us ) 7,600,932 B2* 10/2009 Senba et a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396/529

7,639,353 B2 12/2009 R o oke* * 7 , 9 6 7 , 5 1 3 B 2 6 / 2 0 1 1 Zhang( ) Term 14 Years 8 , 0 4 0 , 6 2 1 B 2 * 1 0 / 2 0 1 1 Chang 6 1 3 1 . . . . . 3 5 9 / 8 2 4

D649,970 S * 12/2011 Lyfordetal. . .D14 / 4 33( 2 1 ) Appl.No.: 29/409,978 8 , 0 7 3 , 3 2 4 B 2 * 1 2 / 2 0 1 1 T s a i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 396/5448 , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B 1 1 0 / 2 0 1 2 O N e i l l

- _ 2007/0275763 A1 1 1/2007 SaWadski t a1 .( 2 2 ) F l l e d ' Dec'3o 2011 2 0 0 7 / 0 2 8 0 6 7 7 A1 1 2 / 2 0 0 7 D r a k e e t a l .( 5 1 ) LOC 9 ) C l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6 - 0 6 g c h i g e f e r l 1

_ r 1 n, r . eta.(52) U.S.Cl. . . . . . . . D 1 6 / 1 3 4,D 1 4 / 5 1 1 20l0/0048243 A1 200) Fourquin e t a l (58) Field o fClassi? cation Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/130, 2010/0328420 A1 12/2010 Roman

D 1 6 / 1 3 4 , 1 3 6 , 2 1 9 , 2 5 0 ; 3 5 9 / 4 0 9 , 8 0 8 , 8 2 3 , 2 0 1 1 / 0 1 1 0 6 5 4 A 1 5 / 2 0 1 1 M a k i3 5 9 / 8 2 7 ' D14/432 43 3 24 2 23 9 48 3 5 1 1 FOREIGN PATENTDOCUMENTS

D 1 4 / 2 1 7 , 4 8 4 ; 3 9 6 / 5 3 0 , 6S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r c o m p l e t e s e a r c h h i s t o r y . W0 WC 0 0 6 0 0 2 6 7 4 1 / 2 0 0 6( 5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d OTHER PUBLICATIONS

U s } ; P A H / B E N T D O C I i I M E N T S / A m a Z o n . c o m : F i s h E y e l e n s + W i d e n g l e L e n s + M a c r o L e n s 3 - i n - lD141692 S 6 1945 Neme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16 136 - - - - Ktf PdPh 4G td Fb.3 2012.2,428,719 A * 1 0 / 1 9 4 7 Nemeth 359/823 1 o r O 1 one pnne on e 3,090,282 A * 5/1963 Angenieux . . 359/823 * . db .3 , 1 3 3 , 1 4 0 A * 5 / 1 9 6 4 W i n c h el l 3 5 9 / 5 1 1 o ne Yexamlner3,138,060 A * 6/1964 Eggert et a 1 . . 359/7023 , 4 5 4 , 3 2 3 A * 7 / 1 9 6 9 D i e r k s e t a l . . 3 5 9 / 6 1 2 Primary ExamineriPaula Greene3 , 6 2 0 , 1 4 9 A * 1 1 / 1 9 7 1 o g l h f l m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 9 6 / 5 3 3 ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , orFirmiKnob be, M a r t e n s , O l s o n&3 , 8 1 7 , 6 0 1 A * 6 / 1 9 7 4 C o l a 1 a c e e t a l . 359/700 Be ar LLP3,828,991 A * 8/1974 Moore . . . . . . . . . 224/610 D248,160 S * 6/1978 Feinblo om e t a 1 . . D 1 6 /2 3 74,264,167 A 4/1981 Plummer . . . . . . . . . . .. 396/17 (57) CLAIMD264,048 S * 4/ 1982 Magner . . . . . . . . D8/382 The ornamental design f o r a l e n s component, a s shoWn a ndD274,336 s * 6/1984 H u ck enb eck . . D 1 6 /1 3 2 describ edD274,691 S * 7/1984 Wallace . . . . . . . D8/336D275,766 S * 10 /1984 S uzuki . . . . D16/134D295,871 S * 5/ 1988 Charles . . . D16/130 DESCRIPTION4,760,510 A 7/1988 Lahti . . . . . . . 362/365 _ _ _ _4 , 8 9 3 , 1 4 3 A * 1 / 1 9 9 0 Sheng-Huei . 396/530 FIG. 1 1 s a f r o n t , t o p , a nd l e f t s 1 d e perspectlve V1eW of l e n s5 , 0 5 0 , 9 6 3 A * 9 / 1 9 9 1 3 5 9 / 8 0 8 Component;5 , 0 5 4 , 8 8 6 A * 1 0 / 1 9 9 1 0 2 3 1 6 6 1 6 1 . 3 5 9 / 8 2 3 FIG 2- f t 1 t - 1 - t h f .5 , 3 1 1 , 3 5 8 A * 5 / 1 9 9 4 P e d e r s o n e t a l . 3 5 9 / 5 1 0 F I G 3 1 mn 1 3 6 V ? I o n ? . l l e w t h e r e ? 5 , 4 1 6 , 5 4 4 A * 5 / 1 9 9 5 S t a p l e t o n 3 9 6 / 5 4 4 - lsarear 9% 0? V1eW_ e r e o 5 , 4 5 5 , 7 1 1 A 4 10/1995 Palmer u 359/353 FIG. 41s a l e f t s 1 d e e l e v a t 1 o n a l V1eW t h e r e o f ;

S3 7 4 , 8 7 8 * 1 0 / 1 9 9 6 Palmer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/ 3 0 FIG. 5 i s a r i g h t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l View t h e r e o f ;

Page 16Exhibit 1


20/115

US D 6 7 8 , 3 7 9 SP a g e 2

F I G . 6 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 7 i s a bottom p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 8 i s a r e a r , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 9 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 0 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 1 i s a f r o n t , t o p , a n d l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e vieW o fa n o t h e r e m b o d i m e n t of l e n s component;F I G . 12 s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n al v i e W h e r e o f ;FIG. 13 s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W h e r e o f ;F I G . 14 s a l e f t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 5 i s a r i g h t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW t h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 6 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 7 i s a bottom l a n vieW h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 8 i s a r e a r , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 1 9 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 0 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 1 i s a f r o n t , t o p , a n d l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e vieW o fa n o t h e r e m b o d i m e n t of l e n s component;F I G . 2 2 s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W h e r e o f ;FIG. 23 s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 4 s a l e f t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W t h e r e o f ;

F I G . 2 5 i s a r i g h t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 6 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 27 s a bottom l a n vieW h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 8 i s a r e a r , b o t t o m , and r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 2 9 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 0 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , and l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 1 i s a f r o n t , t o p , a n d l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e vieW o fa n o t h e r e m b o d i m e n t of l e n s component;F I G . 32 s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o na l v i e W h e r e o f ;FIG. 33 s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W h e r e o f ;F I G . 34 s a l e f t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 5 i s a r i g h t s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 6 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;F I G . 37 s a bottom l a n vieW h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 8 i s a r e a r , b o t t o m , and r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ;F I G . 3 9 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , a n d r i g h t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f ; a n d ,F I G . 4 0 i s a f r o n t , b o t t o m , and l e f t s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e v i e Wt h e r e o f .The f e a t u r e s i l l u s t r a t e d in phantom i n e form n o p a r t o f t h ec l a i m e d d e s i g n .

1 C l a i m , 4 0 Drawing S h e e t s

Page 17Exhibit 1


21/115


22/115

US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 2 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

Page 19Exhibit 1


23/115


F I G . 3

Page 20Exhibit 1


24/115

Page 21Exhibit 1


25/115


/ / / , / / _F I G . 5

Page 22Exhibit 1


26/115


Page 23Exhibit 1


27/115


Page 24Exhibit 1


28/115


Page 25Exhibit 1


29/115


Page 26Exhibit 1


30/115

US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 0 0 f 4 0 US 678,379 S

F I G . 1 0

Page 27Exhibit 1


31/115

US. Patent M a r . 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 S h e e t 1 1 0 1 4 0 US 678,379 S

F I G . 1 ]

Page 28Exhibit 1


32/115


Page 29Exhibit 1


33/115


F I G . 1 3

Page 30Exhibit 1


34/115


F I G . 1 4

Page 31Exhibit 1


35/115


F I G . 1 5

Page 32Exhibit 1


36/115


F I G . [ 6

Page 33Exhibit 1


37/115

Page 34Exhibit 1


38/115


F I G . 1 8

Page 35Exhibit 1


39/115

Page 36Exhibit 1


40/115

Page 37Exhibit 1


41/115

Page 38Exhibit 1


42/115

Page 39Exhibit 1


43/115

Page 40Exhibit 1


44/115

Page 41Exhibit 1


45/115


46/115

Page 43Exhibit 1


47/115

Page 44Exhibit 1


48/115

Page 45Exhibit 1


49/115

Page 46Exhibit 1


50/115

Page 47Exhibit 1


51/115

Page 48Exhibit 1


52/115

Page 49Exhibit 1


53/115

Page 50Exhibit 1


54/115

Page 51Exhibit 1


55/115

Page 52Exhibit 1


56/115

Page 53Exhibit 1


57/115


58/115

Page 55Exhibit 1


59/115

Page 56Exhibit 1


60/115

Page 57Exhibit 1


61/115

EXHIBIT 2


62/115

US008279544B1

( 1 2 ) United States Patent ( 1 0 ) P a t e n t N 0 . : U S 8 , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1O N e i l l ( 4 5 ) Date o f P a t e n t : O c t . 2 , 2012

(54) SELECTIVELYATTACHABLEAND 2007/0275763 A1* 11/2007 SaWadski e t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455/5662007/0280677 A1 1 2 / 2 0 0 7 Drake e t a 1 .REMOVABLE LENSESFOR 2 0 0 9 / 0 1 0 9 5 5 8 A1 4 / 2 0 0 9 S c h a e f e r

COMMUNICATIONDEVICES 2009/0181727 A1 7 / 2 0 0 9 G r i f ? n , J r . e t a 1 .2 0 1 0 / 0 0 4 8 2 4 3 A1 2/2010 Fourquin e t a 1. . . . . . . . . . .. 455/556.1

( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r : P a t r i c k D N e i l l , H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , 2 0 1 0 / 0 3 2 8 4 2 0 A1 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 RomanCA Us ) 2 0 1 1 / 0 1 1 0 6 5 4 A1 5 / 2 0 1 1 Maki_ _ _ FOREIGNPATENTDOCUMENTS( 7 3 ) A s s l g n e e . P r e m i e r S y s t e m s USA, I n c , H u n t 1 n g t o n J P 2 0 0 6 _ 2 5 l 1 5 0 9 / 2 0 0 6

B e a c h CA U s ) J P 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 6 1 3 7 8 / 2 0 0 7W0 WO 006/002674 l / 2 0 0 6( * ) N o t i c e : S u b j e c t t o a n y d i s c l a i m e r , t h e t e r m o f h i sp a t e n t i s e x t e n d e d o r a d j u s t e d u n d e r 3 5 OTHERPUBLICATIONS

U - S - C - 1 5 4 0 3 ) by 0 d a y s - Amazoncom: F i s h Eye e n s + Wide n g l e L e n s + Macro L e n s 3 - i n - 1K i t f o r i P o d i P h o n e 4 G , D e c . 2 6 , 2 0 1 1 .

(21) Appl. No.: 13/366,227 _ _* c i t e d by examlner(22) F i l e d : Feb. 3 , 2012 _ _Prtmary Exammer*ohammed Hasan

Related U _ s _ Application Data ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , o r Firm * nobbe Martens Olson &Bear LLP( 6 0 ) P r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 6 1 / 4 5 4 , 1 3 6 , ? l e d on M a r .1 8 , 2 0 1 1 , p r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 6 1 / 5 0 3 , 8 3 5 , ( 5 7 ) ABSTRACT

?led on J u l . 1 , 2011, provisional application No . - - -6 1 / 5 8 5 85 7 ? l d J 1 2 2012 So me embodlments d i s c l o s e d h e r e i n r e l a t e t o a l e n s compo e on an ' nent having one or more lenses attached to a retainer portion

5 1 I t Cl con?gured t o removably a t t a c h t o communication d e v i c e s( ) n such a s mobile p h o n e s , t a b l e t c o m p u t e r s , media p l a y e r s , andG02B 7 / 0 2 (200601) t h e l i k e . The r e t a i n e r p o r t i o n m a y be con?gured s o a s n o t t o( 5 2 ) US. l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359/827; 359/819 i n t e r f e r e With u s e r s VieW Of d i s p l a y panel Ofthe Commu( 5 8 ) F i e l d o f Classi?cation Search . . . . . . . . . . . 359/81 14827 n i c a t i o n d e v i c e . I n some embodiments, a p l u r a l i t y of l e n s e sS e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r c o m p l e t e s e a r c h h i s t o r y . m ay b e p r o v i d e d , a n d t h e l e n s e s may b e r e m o v a b l y a t t a c h e dt o t h e r e t a i n e r p o r t i o n a n d m ay b e i n t e r c h a n g e a b l e . A t r u c( 5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d t u r e f o r p r o v i d i n g a ?ash m ay a l s o be p r o v i d e d . I n some

U S . PATENT DOCUMENTS6 , 8 8 9 , 0 0 6 B2 5 / 2 0 0 5 K o b a y a s h i7,6 3 9,3 53 B2* 12/2009 Rooke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 356/23927 , 9 6 7 , 5 1 3 B2 6 / 2 0 1 1 Z h a n g

A) ?

e m b o d i m e n t s , a d d i t i o n a l f e a t u r e s may b e p r o v i d e d , s u c h a sa t t a c h m e n t components t o f a c i l i t a t e a t t a c h m e n t t o s t a b i l i t yd e v i c e s , s u c h a s t r i p o d s , and o u s e r - W e a r a b l e a c c e s s o r i e s .

2 0 C l a i m s , 4 4 Drawing S h e e t s

Page 58Exhibit 2


63/115

US. Patent O c t . 2 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 0 1 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

F I G .C

/ / 6Z 5 / / Z /F I G .B

Page 59Exhibit 2


64/115


65/115

S h e e t 3 0 f 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1S. Patent 0 a . 2 , 2 0 1 2

Page 61Exhibit 2


66/115

US. Patent O c t . 2 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 4 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

//0

5Qi f )

Page 62Exhibit 2


67/115

US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 5 0 f 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

A5070

F I G . 2B

Page 63Exhibit 2


68/115

US 8 , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1c t .S. P a t e n t

F I G . 3 A

Page 64Exhibit 2


69/115

US 8 , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1S. P a t e n t

F I G . 3 B

Page 65Exhibit 2


70/115

US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 8 0 f 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

F I G . 4 A

Page 66Exhibit 2


71/115


72/115

US. Patent 0a. , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 0 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

F I G . 5 A

Page 68Exhibit 2


73/115

US. Patent O c t . 2 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 1 o r 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

\' 1

[$ 1 Q I )Q

a J205

F I G . 5 B

Page 69Exhibit 2


74/115

US. Patent O c t . 2 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 2 0 1 4 4 US , 2 7 9 , 5 4 4 B1

F I G . 6 A

Page 70Exhibit 2


75/115


Page 71Exhibit 2


76/115

US. Patent O c t . 2 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1 4 0 f 4 4

Page 72Exhibit 2


77/115


B RE

\ % \

Q MR

Page 73Exhibit 2


78/115


79/115

Page 75Exhibit 2


80/115


81/115


F I G .]

j i J F I G9 H

F I G .C

Page 77Exhibit 2


82/115

Page 78Exhibit 2


83/115

Page 79Exhibit 2


84/115

Page 80Exhibit 2


85/115


86/115

Page 82Exhibit 2


87/115

Page 83Exhibit 2


88/115

Page 84Exhibit 2


89/115

Page 85Exhibit 2


90/115

Page 86Exhibit 2


91/115

Page 87Exhibit 2


92/115

Page 88Exhibit 2


93/115

Page 89Exhibit 2


94/115

Page 90Exhibit 2


95/115

Page 91Exhibit 2


96/115

Page 92Exhibit 2


97/115

Page 93Exhibit 2


98/115

Page 94Exhibit 2


99/115

Page 95Exhibit 2


100/115

Page 96Exhibit 2


101/115

Page 97Exhibit 2


102/115

Page 98Exhibit 2


103/115

Page 99Exhibit 2


104/115

Page 100Exhibit 2


105/115

Page 101Exhibit 2


106/115

Page 102Exhibit 2


107/115

Page 103Exhibit 2


108/115

Page 104Exhibit 2


109/115

Page 105Exhibit 2


110/115

Page 106Exhibit 2


111/115

Page 107Exhibit 2


112/115

Page 108Exhibit 2


113/115

Page 109Exhibit 2


114/115

Page 110Exhibit 2


115/115

Premier Systems v. Shah et. al.

Documents

Transcript of Premier Systems v. Shah et. al.