Preliminaryyy p analysis of the reports on cogeneration ...€¦ · Preliminaryyy p analysis of the...

26
Preliminary analysis of the reports on cogeneration potential in the EU Member States Member States www.cogeneurope.eu

Transcript of Preliminaryyy p analysis of the reports on cogeneration ...€¦ · Preliminaryyy p analysis of the...

Preliminary analysis of the reports y y pon cogeneration potential in the EU

Member StatesMember States

www.cogeneurope.eu

Share of CHP in total electricityelectricity generation in 2007 by Member StateMember State

www.cogeneurope.eu

T t l i t ll d CHP l t i l it 97 7 GW

Electricity generated by cogeneration in 2007• Total installed CHP electrical capacity: 97,7 GWel

• Total CHP electricity production: 364,4 TWhel

• Total CHP heat production: 845,1 TWhh

www.cogeneurope.eu

CHP manufacturers in EuropeWärtsilä Siemens

Tognum (MTU

Rolls Royce Bergen

Scania

Tognum (MTU Onsite Energy)MWMMAN DieselPRO 2

CentraxRolls RoyceEnerGFi i

o s oyce e geSeva Energie2G EnergietechnikKawasaki

Vaillant

BaxiCeres PowerEnergetix Genlec

Finning BuderusSenerTecBosch

TEDOM

Vyncke

Remeha

TEDOM

GE Jenbacher

Fiat Power Train

Solar Turbines/ T b h

Alstom

Fiat Power Train

AB Energy Riello EcogenaCPL ConcordiaTurbomach

ABB

Guascor

CPL Concordia

www.cogeneurope.eu

Cogeneration sector in Europe

SupplyProduction

Development Distribution Operation

•Employs around100 000 people directly in the sector•Employs around100,000 people directly in the sector

•Part of Europe’s innovation and knowledge economy: world experts in CHP design and delivery and leaders in micro-CHP technologyg y gy

www.cogeneurope.eu

Cogeneration Directive requirements

Estimate Cogeneration potential

•Cogeneration Directive 2004/08/EC completed in potential

IdentifyReport on

pBrussels end of 2008•European Directive developed under the energy strategy to Identify 

BarriersReport on Progresspromote cogeneration for its

contribution to security of supply and energy efficiency

Put Guarantee of

•Sets up a policy framework for the promotion of cogeneration•The Directive requires Member St t t t l

Review support mechanisms

Put Guarantee of origin and statistical 

reporting in place

States to report on several aspects their cogeneration use and promotion

www.cogeneurope.eu

CODE project

•30 month project funded by p j yIEE and COGEN Europe organisations

•Independent view of the progress of Member States under the Directive

•Regional structure across Find more information on

Europe gathers input from stakeholders on impact of the Directive implementation as it

www.code-project.eu

Directive implementation as it develops

www.cogeneurope.eu

CODE project partners

Project Coordinator: Fiona Riddoch, COGEN Europe, [email protected]

P t ibl f E t E iPartner responsible for Eastern Europe region: Stane Merše, Jožef Stefan Institute (JSI), [email protected]: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia

Partner responsible for Northern Europe region: Paul Gardiner, Combined Heat and Power Association (CHPA), [email protected]: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, g yUnited Kingdom

Partner responsible for South-Eastern Europe region: Costas Theofylaktos, Hellenic Association for the Cogeneration of Heat and Power (HACHP), [email protected]: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Romania

Partner responsible for South Western Europe region: M i k R ij lt F d tiPartner responsible for South-Western Europe region: Marieke Reijalt, Federation of the Scientific and Technical Association (FAST), [email protected]: France, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Spain

www.cogeneurope.eu

National Potentials Reporting by Member State

www.cogeneurope.eu

National Potentials Reporting by Member State

www.cogeneurope.eu

Comments on interim analysis of European potential y p pfor cogeneration (8 October 2009)

Member State Comment

Austria Have provided technical information only. 

Fi l d D i d f t d tFinland Derived from report data.

France No Member State report. No other published report adopted.

Hungary No Member State report No other published report adoptedHungary No Member State report. No other published report adopted.

Italy Significant additional work required on Member State report.

Netherlands Report submitted but declined to estimate a potentialNetherlands Report submitted but declined to estimate a potential.

Portugal  No Member State report. No other published report adopted.

Sweden, Bulgaria, Translation of full report pending.Sweden, Bulgaria, Romania

Translation of full report pending.

www.cogeneurope.eu

Preliminary analysis of European cogeneration -y y p gadditional economic potential

Europe’s installed cogeneration capacity in 27 Member States: 97 7 GWe97.7 GWe

Europe’s additional economic potential in 23 Member States:Europe s additional economic potential in 23 Member States: 122 GWe

www.cogeneurope.eu

European economic potential for cogeneration in 2020

www.cogeneurope.eu

European economic potential for cogeneration in 2020

www.cogeneurope.eu

The assessment of economic potential has been carried out in markedly different ways in different Member States.

www.cogeneurope.eu

Results – Industrial SectorsResults Industrial Sectors

• The cost effective potential for Cogeneration in Low p gTemperature Industries

• This is additional to existing operational capacity

Delivered Energy Capacities (MW)

Sector Heat (TWh) Electricity (TWh) Heat Electricity( ) y ( ) y

Chemicals 23 18 2,842 2,220

Engineering 13 10 1,613 1,260

Food 11 8 1,322 1,033

Paper 5 4 661 516

Textiles 2 1 224 175

Other 2 1 237 185

Total at 15% DR 56 43 6,898 5,389

Total at 3.5% DR 67 53 8339 6515

www.cogeneurope.eu

Cogeneration potential in Community Heating

City/Area CH/cogeneration Potential (MWe)

3.5% 6% 9%

London postcodes 2,366 2,026 85

Birmingham postcodes 1,191 948 0

Manchester postcodes 733 644 0

Sheffield postcodes 924 660 0

Southampton postcodes 384 268 0

Leicester postcodes 600 344 0

Liverpool postcodes 804 643 1Liverpool postcodes 804 643 1

Leeds postcodes 546 370 0

Bristol postcodes 559 390 0

Newcastle postcodes 763 609 0p

Cardiff postcodes 0 0 0

Other UK in England & Wales 24,362 15,654 5

S b t t l 33 231 22 558 91Sub-total 33,231 22,558 91

Scotland and N.Ireland 3,323 2,256 9

TOTAL 36,554 24,814 100

www.cogeneurope.eu

Regional observations

•There is significant industrial potential for CHP in Europe. In the larger i thi k d 50% f th t ti leconomies this makes up around 50% of the potential.

•In southern parts of Europe, the industrial potential and tertiary sector potential have been stressed over the district heating potential. •Significant potential exists in new Member States particularly for refurbishment of district heating schemes and their upgrade to include modern cogeneration where previously only heat was distributed. This g y yis universally the case where a large district heating infrastructure already exists.•In many new Member States the highest share of economic potential in y g pthe evaluated technical potential is linked to the modernisation and upgrade of cogeneration units in district heating systems, with the replacement of existing steam turbines by combined cycle units running on natural gason natural gas.

www.cogeneurope.eu

European economic and technical potential for cogeneration in 2020in 2020

www.cogeneurope.eu

Technical potential reported

•There is a low level of reporting of technical potential

Technical potential reported

There is a low level of reporting of technical potential among the Member States.•Where technical potential has been identified separately, p p y,a wide range of sectors have been highlighted. •Potential is seen across the full capacity size ranges of CHP installations from micro to very large scale. •In general, little focus has been put on the potential

i t d ith i CHP li bi dassociated with micro CHP, cooling or bio-energy, and these remain a potential upside to the published figures.

www.cogeneurope.eu

Examples of CHP in real life

Akzo Nobel Delesto industrial CHP plant. It provides steam andpower to facilities in Delfzijl where Akzo Nobel produces salt,chlorine and Derivatives. It produces 520 MW of power, partly

District heating CHP plant in Ljubljana is producingelectricity and supplying the city with hot water. It has 124MW of installed electrical capacity and 350 MW of installed

consumed by the Chemical Park Delfzijl (including Akzo Nobel),partly supplied to the Dutch high voltage grid. It is the biggestcogeneration site in the Netherlands.

heat capacity. It could produce 550 GWh of electricity and1650 GWh of heat per year. It is the biggest cogenerationsite in Slovenia.

www.cogeneurope.eu

Dachs G 5,5 micro CHP on natural gas,Electrical output: 5,5kWThermal output: 12,5 kW

Greenhouse: possibility to use medium size CHP(150kW).

Interim Summary of European cogeneration additional i t ti leconomic potential

The additional economic potential as reported by Member States:

• Total additional Electrical Capacity: 122 GWe • Total additional Electricity Generation: 455 TWh p.a.Total additional Electricity Generation: 455 TWh p.a.• Total additional Primary Energy Saving

expressed as electricity (min): 46 TWh p.a.• Total additional CO2 avoided (min): 20 mton p.a. • Value of CO2 avoided: 798 mEuro* p.a.p*Evaluated at carbon price of 39Euro/ton CO2 (ref. ETS impact study)

www.cogeneurope.eu

ConclusionConclusion

Full report on national potentials and barriers will be available at p pthe end of October.

From the analysis so far it is clear that the economic potential exists to greatly increase the cogeneration capacity in Europe by 2020.

Member States are identifying an economic potential which can contribute significantly to Europe’s Energy Savings targets for 20202020.

www.cogeneurope.eu

Policy ImperativePolicy Imperative

•Maintain strong focus on Energy Efficiency for all transformation i E U i E liprocess in European Union Energy policy

•Focus on implementation of existing policy which supports cogenerationcogeneration

•Develop as necessary additional measures to achieve full exploitation of the economic potential identified by member states

•Following best practise now available in Europe to create a truly consistent framework for cogeneration in Europe and an enabling policy structure for cogeneration developmentg p

www.cogeneurope.eu

Good news: cogeneration inside!

Atomium Berlaymont

Bundestag Buckingham Palace La Défense

www.cogeneurope.eu

www.cogeneurope.eu