PREDICTING PERFORMANCE OF AXIAL PUMP INDUCER OF LOX BOOSTER TURBO-PUMP ... · From the performance...

1
TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008 www.PosterPresentations.com PREDICTING PERFORMANCE OF AXIAL PUMP INDUCER OF LOX BOOSTER TURBO - PUMP OF STAGED COMBUSTION CYCLE BASED ROCKET ENGINE USING CFD Cryogenic Engineering Centre Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India Arpit Mishra, Parthasarathi Ghosh Designed by ABSTRACT For low cost, high thrust, space mission with high specific impulse and high reliability, inert weight demand to be curtailed down and thereby increasing the delivered payload. Turbopump feed system for a liquid propellant rocket engine (LPRE) has the highest power to weight ratio. Turbopumps are primarily equipped with an axial flow inducer to achieve the high angular velocity and low suction pressure in combination with increased system reliability. The performance of turbopump strongly depends on the performance of inducer. Thus, for designing a turbopump for an LPRE demands optimization of inducer geometry based on the performance of different off-design operating regimes. In this paper, steady-state CFD analysis of the inducer of the liquid oxygen (LOX) axial pump used as a booster pump for an oxygen rich staged combustion cycle based rocket engine has been presented using ANSYS® CFX. Attempts have been made to obtain the performance characteristic curves for the LOX pump inducer. The formalism has been used to predict the performance of the inducer for the throttling range varying from 80% to 113 % of nominal thrust and for the different rotational velocities ranges from 4500 to 7500 rpm. The results have been analysed to find out the region of cavitation inception for different inlet pressure. INTRODUCTION The primary constraint on space enterprises is the high cost of escaping Earth’s gravity. Therefore, for manned space mission and deep space probes, reusable launch vehicles are contemplated to be used. For high thrust, mission with high specific impulse, mass of the propellant tanks would be prohibitive [1]. There should be a booster turbopump, for raising the pressure to a small amount, and to ensure the cavitation free operation at the main pump inlet [2]. Turbopump feed systems used for high thrust ,long duration operation in oxygen-rich, staged combustion cycle based liquid propellant rocket engines to increase the power to weight ratio and to raise the performance over pressure feed systems [2]. The performance of turbopump strongly depends on the performance of inducer. The LOX booster turbopump consists of an axial tip turbine driven pump in which LOX is pumped by a helical inducer is driven by a velocity compounded impulse turbine [3]. The engines operate in a wide range of throttling condition. One of the steps in the design of turbopumps is to confirm the performance characteristics under varying operating conditions. REFERENCES 1. Arnone A., Bonchinelli P.,Sapano E. and Capuani A., “ARIANE 5” TPLOX inducer design strategies to enhance cavitating performance”, CAV 2001:session B-7.004.(2001). 2. Pinera et al., (2012), Axial tip turbine driven pump, U.S. state patent US 8,177,489 B1. 3. Huzel K.D., and Huang H, “Design of liquid propellant rocket engine”, Second edition, NASA SP-125,(1971). 4. Ding M.Y., Groth C., Kacker S., and Robert D., “CFD analysis of off design centrifugal compressor operation and performance” . 5. Pierrat D., Gros L., Pintrand G., Fur B.L. and Gyomlai P., “Experimental And Numerical Investigations Of Leading Edge Cavitation In A Helico Centrifugal Pump”,The 12th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery, ISROMAC12-2008-20074, (2008). OBJECTIVE The Flow of axial pump inducer of turbo-pump system is highly complex due to 3D flow structure involving turbulence, recirculation, tip vortices and cavitation induced unsteadiness. CFD is an important tool where the flow field of the inducer can be numerically estimated for the investigation of the performance of the pump inducer [4, 5]. In the present work, with the help of ANSYS® CFX LOX pump inducer has been analysed with the following objectives. 1)To plot performance characteristic curves of the inducer for different off design operating conditions. 2)To study the effect of variation in different process parameters like mass flow rate, rotational speed and inlet total pressure on the performance of the axial pump inducer of LOX booster turbo-pump. METHODOLOGY CONCLUSIONS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Effect of Inlet pressure variation (a) p 0, 1 / p 0, 1, d =1.32 (b) p 0, 1 / p 0, 1, d =1.212 (c) p 0, 1 / p 0, 1, d =1.10 (d) p 0, 1 / p 0, 1, d =1 (e) p 0, 1 / p 0, 1, d =0.85 (f) p 0, 1 / p 0, 1, d =0.74 (g) p 0, 1 / p 0, 1, d =0.64 (h) p 0, 1 / p 0, 1, d =0.53 (i) p 0, 1 / p 0, 1, d =0.43 (j) p 0, 1 / p 0, 1, d =0.212 Effect of Mass flow rate variation (a) ϕ /ϕ d =1.19 (b) ϕ /ϕ d =1.10 (c) ϕ /ϕ d =1.05 (d) ϕ /ϕ d =1.0 (e) ϕ /ϕ d =0.94 (f) ϕ /ϕ d =0.89 (g) ϕ /ϕ d =0.84 Effect of operating speed variation (a) 4500 RPM (b)5000 RPM (c)5197 RPM (d)5500 RPM (e) 6000 RPM (f) 6500 RPM (g) 7016 RPM (h) 7221 RPM (i) 7500 RPM PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE INDCUER A Geometry of axial pump inducer for LOX turbopump FIGURE 3. 2D fabrication drawing of the inducer for the LOX booster turbo-pump for staged combustion cycle based rocket engine. Numerical simulation methodology Table 1. Mesh statistics for the inducer Grid generation Unstructured , mostly tetrahedral grid for the three dimensional model has been created in Ansys® Meshing software. To model the cavitating region, high grid density cells with small aspect ratio has been created at the inducer leading tip for all three helical blades. The computational domain consists of 8.94 million nodes and 51.5 million elements. Different meshing statistics is summarised below in Table 1. Domain No. of nodes No. of Elements Method Mesh Type/ Type of elements Inducer 8947153 51580950 Patch conforming Unstructured/ Mostly Tetrahedral Numerical modeling Boundary conditions Subsonic inlet with stationary frame total pressure and temperature defined at the inlet with normal flow direction profiles and mass flow rate at the outlet of the axial inducer. Turbulence intensity level set to be medium intensity of about 5%. Table 2. Input data required for the CFD analysis of 100% nominal thrust condition Parameter Input data Inlet domain Inducer inlet Flow Direction Normal to Boundary Flow regime Subsonic T 0,1 [K] 91 p o,1 [M Pa] 0.47 Mass flow rate [kg/s] 442 Design speed, N d [rpm] 7016 Different thermophysical parameters required to set numerical simulation for the 100% nominal thrust condition are summarised in Table 2. The analysis has been performed for the off-design performance prediction of LOX pump inducer for different mass flow rates and FIGURE 4. 3D fabricated model of the inducer created in AUTODESK Inventor. FIGURE 1. SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF STAGED COMBUSTION CYCLE WITH OXYGEN RICH BOOSTER TURBOPUMP FIFIGURE 2. LOX BOOSTER TURBOPUMP ASSEMBLY Table 3. Performance parameters for axial flow inducer at 100% nominal thrust condition Performance parameter Output data N s 103.60 N ss 323.20 N ss/corrected 344.87 0.09 p 0.35 s 0.28 H [m] 147.92 NPSH a [m] 32.26 NPSH r [m] 36.98 cav 0.077 0.22 P t [kW] 707.48 P h 637.48 P 90.10% Figure 5. Total head rise coefficient vs. Flow coefficient Figure 6. Efficiency vs. Flow coefficient Figure 7. Efficiency vs. Specific speed Figure 8. NPSH vs. Specific speed Figure 9. THOMA Factor vs. Suction specific speed rotating speeds in which Q/Qd is from 0.80 to 1.13 and rotational speed of the axial flow inducer ranges from 4500 to 7500 rpm respectively. PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS CURVEOF THE INDCUER The values of various performance parameters are summarized in Table 3. Figure 5. , it is observed that below the designed flow rate of 90% of nominal flow coefficient, there is dip in the head. The depression in operating performance curve indicates the flow separation. This is known as stalling point of the pump. Figure 6. , shows that the maximum efficiency of 90.71% occurs at 95% thrust condition. The efficiency curve falls steeply below the stalling point and hence, the pump should operated at a flow rate near to the designed point for economical operation. Figure 7., shows that the efficiency is maximum at designed specific speed. At higher specific speed, the hydraulic losses increases, efficiency decreases and at the lower specific speeds the amount of friction and cavitation induced losses increase results in sudden reduction in efficiency. Figure 8., shows that the value of NPSHa < NPSHr for the design thrust value. This ensures that the pump inducer is designed to work under the influence of cavitation to achieve the high power to weight ratio for low cost liquid rocket engines. Figure 9., shows that above the designed suction specific speed chances of cavitation increase as the value of thoma cavitation factor decreases. For the steady state mathematical solution of the discretized three- dimensional, Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) based two-equation zonal SST (shear stress transport) k-ω eddy viscosity used for turbulence modeling. High resolution advection scheme was used in all simulations. Figure 10.a Velocity vector plot for ϕ /ϕ d = 1 Figure 10.b Velocity vector plot for ϕ /ϕ d = 0.84 Figure 11. Vorticity contours for different throttling conditions As the mass flow rate is reduced, there is a flow reversal at the tip of the inducer due to which vortices are formed. It can be revealed by velocity vectors shown in Figure 10. (a) and Figure 10. (b). With the decrease in mass flow rate chances of increase in backflow vortices lead to stalling of the pump due to choking as shown in Figure 11. Figure 12. Iso surface corresponding to vapor pressure for the varying speed ranges from 4500 rpm to 7500 rpm. Figure 10 (a) to (i), show that from 4500 RPM to 5197 RPM low pressure region has engulfed the blade flow passage. This phenomenon depicts the chances of vapour lock at low speed values. As the speed is increased, this low pressure region contracts. Further increase in speed leads to tip vortex cavitation. Therefore, for the satisfactory operation, pump inducer should work in the range of 5197 RPM to 7221 RPM. Figure 13. Iso volume contours for the absolute static pressure value equals to or less than vapor pressure for different inlet total pressure varying from 0.62 M Pa to 0.1 M Pa. Figure 13., shows that as inlet total pressure decreases, the inception of tip vortex cavitation occurs at the leading edge of the inducer. Further as the inlet total pressure reduces gradually cavitation grows, and the cavities fill the inlet of the inducer. From the performance characteristics curves and parametric analysis of the LOX pump inducer, it has been found out that- The designed pump is a cavitating inducer designed to work satisfactorily under cavitating conditions for the throttling range varying from 90 % to 113 %. As the engine throttles below 90 % of the nominal thrust, abrupt depression in head curve is observed due to stalling. Through parametric studies of the operational parameters, it has been revealed that the pump should operate for the flow coefficient higher than ϕ /ϕd =0.94 in the speed range 5197 RPM to 7221RPM for the designed inlet pressure value. It has been found out that flow instabilities such as tip vortex cavitation, backflow vortices and stall occurs at the off design conditions leading to substantial performance losses. Need for design modifications may arise if the inducer is to be operated at wider operating range. CEC-ICMC 2015 : Track : CEC – 05 : I.D : C3PoE : 132

Transcript of PREDICTING PERFORMANCE OF AXIAL PUMP INDUCER OF LOX BOOSTER TURBO-PUMP ... · From the performance...

Page 1: PREDICTING PERFORMANCE OF AXIAL PUMP INDUCER OF LOX BOOSTER TURBO-PUMP ... · From the performance characteristics curves and parametric analysis of the LOX pump inducer, it has been

TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008

www.PosterPresentations.com

PREDICTING PERFORMANCE OF AXIAL PUMP INDUCER OF LOX BOOSTER TURBO-PUMP OF STAGED COMBUSTION CYCLE BASED ROCKET ENGINE USING CFD

Cryogenic Engineering Centre Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, IndiaArpit Mishra, Parthasarathi Ghosh

Designed by

ABSTRACTFor low cost, high thrust, space mission with high specific impulse and highreliability, inert weight demand to be curtailed down and thereby increasingthe delivered payload. Turbopump feed system for a liquid propellant rocketengine (LPRE) has the highest power to weight ratio. Turbopumps areprimarily equipped with an axial flow inducer to achieve the high angularvelocity and low suction pressure in combination with increased systemreliability. The performance of turbopump strongly depends on theperformance of inducer. Thus, for designing a turbopump for an LPREdemands optimization of inducer geometry based on the performance ofdifferent off-design operating regimes. In this paper, steady-state CFDanalysis of the inducer of the liquid oxygen (LOX) axial pump used as abooster pump for an oxygen rich staged combustion cycle based rocketengine has been presented using ANSYS® CFX. Attempts have been made toobtain the performance characteristic curves for the LOX pump inducer. Theformalism has been used to predict the performance of the inducer for thethrottling range varying from 80% to 113 % of nominal thrust and for thedifferent rotational velocities ranges from 4500 to 7500 rpm. The resultshave been analysed to find out the region of cavitation inception fordifferent inlet pressure.

INTRODUCTIONThe primary constraint on space enterprises is the high cost of escapingEarth’s gravity. Therefore, for manned space mission and deep space probes,reusable launch vehicles are contemplated to be used. For high thrust, mission with high specific impulse, mass of the propellant

tanks would be prohibitive [1]. There should be a booster turbopump, for raising the pressure to a small

amount, and to ensure the cavitation free operation at the main pumpinlet [2].

Turbopump feed systems used for high thrust ,long duration operation inoxygen-rich, staged combustion cycle based liquid propellant rocketengines to increase the power to weight ratio and to raise theperformance over pressure feed systems [2].

The performance of turbopump strongly depends on the performance ofinducer.

The LOX booster turbopump consists of an axial tip turbine driven pumpin which LOX is pumped by a helical inducer is driven by a velocitycompounded impulse turbine [3].

The engines operate in a wide range of throttling condition. One of the steps in the design of turbopumps is to confirm the

performance characteristics under varying operating conditions.

REFERENCES1. Arnone A., Bonchinelli P.,Sapano E. and Capuani A., “ARIANE 5” TPLOX inducer design strategies to enhance cavitating performance”, CAV 2001:session B-7.004.(2001).

2. Pinera et al., (2012), Axial tip turbine driven pump, U.S. state patent US 8,177,489 B1.

3. Huzel K.D., and Huang H, “Design of liquid propellant rocket engine”, Second edition, NASA SP-125,(1971).

4. Ding M.Y., Groth C., Kacker S., and Robert D., “CFD analysis of off design centrifugal compressor operation and performance”.

5. Pierrat D., Gros L., Pintrand G., Fur B.L. and Gyomlai P., “Experimental And Numerical Investigations Of Leading Edge Cavitation In A Helico Centrifugal Pump”,The 12th International Symposium on

Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery, ISROMAC12-2008-20074, (2008).

OBJECTIVE The Flow of axial pump inducer of turbo-pump system is highly complex dueto 3D flow structure involving turbulence, recirculation, tip vortices andcavitation induced unsteadiness. CFD is an important tool where the flow field of the inducer can benumerically estimated for the investigation of the performance of the pumpinducer [4, 5].In the present work, with the help of ANSYS® CFX LOX pump inducer hasbeen analysed with the following objectives.1) To plot performance characteristic curves of the inducer for different off

design operating conditions.2) To study the effect of variation in different process parameters like mass flow

rate, rotational speed and inlet total pressure on the performance of theaxial pump inducer of LOX booster turbo-pump.

METHODOLOGY

CONCLUSIONS

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Effect of Inlet pressure variation

(a) p 0, 1/ p 0, 1, d =1.32 (b) p 0, 1/ p 0, 1, d =1.212 (c) p 0, 1/ p 0, 1, d =1.10 (d) p 0, 1/ p 0, 1, d =1 (e) p 0, 1/ p 0, 1, d =0.85

(f) p 0, 1/ p 0, 1, d =0.74 (g) p 0, 1/ p 0, 1, d =0.64 (h) p 0, 1/ p 0, 1, d =0.53 (i) p 0, 1/ p 0, 1, d =0.43 (j) p 0, 1/ p 0, 1, d =0.212

Effect of Mass flow rate variation

(a) ϕ /ϕd =1.19 (b) ϕ /ϕd =1.10 (c) ϕ /ϕd=1.05

(d) ϕ /ϕd =1.0 (e) ϕ /ϕd =0.94 (f) ϕ /ϕd =0.89 (g) ϕ /ϕd=0.84

Effect of operating speed variation

(a) 4500 RPM (b)5000 RPM (c)5197 RPM (d)5500 RPM

(e) 6000 RPM (f) 6500 RPM (g) 7016 RPM (h) 7221 RPM (i) 7500 RPM

PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE INDCUER

A

Geometry of axial pump inducer for LOX turbopump

FIGURE 3. 2D fabrication drawing of the inducer

for the LOX booster turbo-pump for staged

combustion cycle based rocket engine.

Numerical simulation methodology

Table 1. Mesh statistics for the inducer

Grid generation

Unstructured , mostly tetrahedral grid for the three dimensional modelhas been created in Ansys® Meshing software.To model the cavitating region, high grid density cells with small aspectratio has been created at the inducer leading tip for all three helical blades.The computational domain consists of 8.94 million nodes and 51.5 millionelements. Different meshing statistics is summarised below in Table 1.

Domain No. of nodes No. of Elements Method Mesh Type/ Type of elements

Inducer 8947153 51580950 Patch

conforming

Unstructured/ Mostly Tetrahedral

Numerical modeling

Boundary conditions

Subsonic inlet with stationary frame total pressure and temperaturedefined at the inlet with normal flow direction profiles and mass flowrate at the outlet of the axial inducer.

Turbulence intensity level set to be medium intensity of about 5%.

Table 2. Input data required for the CFD analysis of 100% nominal thrust condition

Parameter Input dataInlet domain Inducer inlet

Flow Direction Normal to BoundaryFlow regime Subsonic

T0,1 [K] 91po,1 [M Pa] 0.47

Mass flow rate [kg/s]

442

Design speed, Nd

[rpm]7016

Different thermophysicalparameters required to setnumerical simulation for the100% nominal thrust conditionare summarised in Table 2.

The analysis has been performedfor the off-design performanceprediction of LOX pump inducerfor different mass flow rates and

FIGURE 4. 3D fabricated model of the inducer

created in AUTODESK Inventor.

FIGURE 1. SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF STAGED

COMBUSTION CYCLE WITH OXYGEN RICH

BOOSTER TURBOPUMP

FIFIGURE 2. LOX BOOSTER TURBOPUMP

ASSEMBLY

Table 3. Performance parameters

for axial flow inducer at 100%

nominal thrust condition

Performance parameter Output data

Ns 103.60

Nss 323.20

Nss/corrected 344.87

0.09

p 0.35

s 0.28

H [m] 147.92

NPSHa [m] 32.26

NPSHr [m] 36.98 cav 0.077 0.22

Pt [kW] 707.48

Ph 637.48 P 90.10%

Figure 5. Total head rise coefficient vs.

Flow coefficient

Figure 6. Efficiency vs. Flow coefficient Figure 7. Efficiency vs.

Specific speed

Figure 8. NPSH vs. Specific speed Figure 9. THOMA Factor vs.

Suction specific speed

rotating speeds in which Q/Qd is from 0.80 to 1.13 and rotational speedof the axial flow inducer ranges from 4500 to 7500 rpm respectively.

PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS CURVEOF THE INDCUER

The values of various performance parameters are summarized in Table 3.

Figure 5. , it is observed that below the designed flow rate of 90% ofnominal flow coefficient, there is dip in the head. The depression inoperating performance curve indicates the flow separation. This is knownas stalling point of the pump.

Figure 6. , shows that the maximum efficiency of 90.71% occurs at 95%thrust condition. The efficiency curve falls steeply below the stalling pointand hence, the pump should operated at a flow rate near to the designedpoint for economical operation.

Figure 7., shows that the efficiency is maximum at designed specificspeed. At higher specific speed, the hydraulic losses increases, efficiencydecreases and at the lower specific speeds the amount of friction andcavitation induced losses increase results in sudden reduction inefficiency.

Figure 8., shows that the value of NPSHa < NPSHr for the design thrustvalue. This ensures that the pump inducer is designed to work under theinfluence of cavitation to achieve the high power to weight ratio for lowcost liquid rocket engines.

Figure 9., shows that above the designed suction specific speed chancesof cavitation increase as the value of thoma cavitation factor decreases.

For the steady state mathematical solution of the discretized three-dimensional, Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) based two-equationzonal SST (shear stress transport) k-ω eddy viscosity used for turbulencemodeling.

High resolution advection scheme was used in all simulations.

Figure 10.a Velocity vector plot for ϕ /ϕd = 1

Figure 10.b Velocity vector plot for ϕ /ϕd = 0.84

Figure 11. Vorticity contours for different throttling conditions

As the mass flow rate is reduced, there is aflow reversal at the tip of the inducer dueto which vortices are formed. It can berevealed by velocity vectors shown inFigure 10. (a) and Figure 10. (b). With thedecrease in mass flow rate chances ofincrease in backflow vortices lead to stallingof the pump due to choking as shown inFigure 11.

Figure 12. Iso surface corresponding to vapor pressure for the

varying speed ranges from 4500 rpm to 7500 rpm.

Figure 10 (a) to (i), show that

from 4500 RPM to 5197 RPM lowpressure region has engulfed theblade flow passage. Thisphenomenon depicts the chancesof vapour lock at low speed values.As the speed is increased, this lowpressure region contracts. Furtherincrease in speed leads to tipvortex cavitation. Therefore, forthe satisfactory operation, pumpinducer should work in the range of5197 RPM to 7221 RPM.

Figure 13. Iso volume contours for the absolute static pressure

value equals to or less than vapor pressure for different inlet

total pressure varying from 0.62 M Pa to 0.1 M Pa.

Figure 13., shows that as inlettotal pressure decreases, theinception of tip vortexcavitation occurs at the leadingedge of the inducer. Further asthe inlet total pressure reducesgradually cavitation grows, andthe cavities fill the inlet of theinducer.

From the performance characteristics curves and parametric analysis of the LOX pump inducer, it has beenfound out that-

The designed pump is a cavitating inducer designed to work satisfactorily under cavitating conditions forthe throttling range varying from 90 % to 113 %. As the engine throttles below 90 % of the nominal thrust,abrupt depression in head curve is observed due to stalling.

Through parametric studies of the operational parameters, it has been revealed that the pump shouldoperate for the flow coefficient higher than ϕ /ϕd =0.94 in the speed range 5197 RPM to 7221RPM forthe designed inlet pressure value.

It has been found out that flow instabilities such as tip vortex cavitation, backflow vortices and stall occursat the off design conditions leading to substantial performance losses.

Need for design modifications may arise if the inducer is to be operated at wider operating range.

CEC-ICMC 2015 : Track : CEC – 05 : I.D : C3PoE : 132