Preclinical development (C. Salcedo)
-
Upload
la-unidad-de-toxicologia-experimental-y-ecotoxicologia-utox-pcb -
Category
Documents
-
view
924 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Preclinical development (C. Salcedo)
- Confidential - 1
Preclinical Development, an overview:
do we need a change?
Carolina Salcedo, PhD Director Pharmacology, SANIFIT
JORNADA TOX® Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013
CERETOX Photo: Can open innovation close the pharma productivity gap? By John McCulloch @ MaRS June 7, 2011
- Confidential -
Registration
2
Clinical Trials
Drug Discovery and Development
Preclinical Development
Candidate selection
Lead selection and optimization
Target Discovery
3-5 years
1 year
5-7 years
5-7 year
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
400 M $
1 B $
From 1000nds to 1-3 1-3 1
- Confidential -
Preclinical Development
3
Preclinical Package
1. Chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC)
2. Efficacy
3. Safety
4. Toxicology
5. ADME & PK
6. Documentation : IB + IMPD
JORNADA TOX®
(Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
- Confidential - 4
Provide a safety margin
Define the dose/concentration to start human trials (NOAEL)
Define max dose/concentration to be dosed in humans
Target organs/ Rescue treatments
Obtain regulatory approval of clinical studies (IB, IMPD)
Predict toxic/safety concerns
Select a candidate
Help in next step study designs
Clinical Development
Preclinical Development
Candidate selection
Exploratory toxicology
Exploratory safety
Regulatory toxicology
Regulatory safety
Preclinical Development
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
- Confidential -
Additional/follow-up studies
Clinical Development
Critical tasks
5
Preclinical Development
Candidate selection
Exploratory toxicology
Exploratory safety
Regulatory toxicology
Regulatory safety
Genotoxicity
Repeated dose toxicity
Reproductive/juvenile tox.
Carcinogenicity
Local tolerance
Cardiovascular
CNS
Respiratory
Follow-up studies
Additional studies
General toxicity in silico/ in vitro
Preliminar genotoxicity
Preliminary toxicity in vivo
Off-target binding profile
Preliminary CV safety
Immunotoxicity
Preliminary CNS safety
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
- Confidential -
Exploratory toxicology&safety
6
Toxicology Assay
General Tox Citotox
Glutathion Depletion
Phospholipidosis
Phototox
Genotox Ames
Micronucleus
Special Tox LLNA
Topical irritation
In vivo Acute Tox
Repeated Dose Tox
Others Zebrafish
In silico DEREK, TOPAK, OncoLogic, CASE
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
Safety Assay
General Off -targets
QT hERG
Purkinge
Guinea Pig ECG
CNS Irwin
Others? Renal, GI
- Confidential -
Regulatory safety&toxicology
7
EMA/FDA ICH guidelines: • Guidelines are not recipes! • Tailored to your compound
M3 S1- Carcinogenicity S2 - Genotoxicity S3- Toxicokinetics /PK S4- Duration of chronc testing in animals S5 -Reprotoxicity S6 -Biotechnology S7- Safety Pharmacology /QT S8- Immunotoxicology
Toni Guzman !!!
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
- Confidential - 8
The toxicological development plan depends on:
• Design of the clinical trial that will be supported: duration, population
• Administration route
• Therapeutic indication
• Pharmacological target
• Exposure / Metabolism
The toxicological development plan need to answer:
• What is the maximal dose without adverse effects?
• What are the main targets of toxicity ?
• Are the effects reversible ? Monitorable ?
JORNADA TOX®
(Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
Regulatory safety&toxicology
- Confidential - 9
Are differences really due to the treatment?
• Dose response (and exposure response!)
• Consistency between sexes (not necessarily!)
• Consistency with other parameters and other available studies
• Artifacts possible?
• Anomalous values in vehicle group?
If they are related to the treatment, are they adverse?
• Exaggerated pharmacology or off-target effect?
• Magnitude of the difference compared to physiological range.
• Direct versus indirect effects. Feedback response effects. Stress-related
effects.
If they are adverse, are they relevant to humans??? JORNADA TOX®
(Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
Regulatory safety&toxicology
- Confidential -
105
104
103
102
101
Co
nc
en
tra
tio
n (
nM
)*
In vitro
IC50
Kd
Cell
activity
pA2
IC50
Animal
Model
Animal
Model
EC50 ID50
28d
Rat
Tox
28d
No rodent
Tox
MLD
LOAEL
NOAEL
Human
Active
(Pred)
HEC
Off-
targets
hERG Rat
Resp
safety
Dog
Cardio
Safety
Rat
CNS
safety
Ph I
Good Tol &
Biomark
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
Safety margin
- Confidential - 11
Estimation of dose for FIH
If they are adverse, are they relevant to humans??? Monitorable, Reversible (Rescue treatment) Jumping into human doses: FDA Guidance for Industry: Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult Healthy Volunteers
• Establish HED/MRSD based on NOAEL/MABEL • Apply safety margin • Define a escalation range
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
- Confidential - 12
Jonathan Hitchcock, 2003 Pfizer
However….are we doing well?
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
- Confidential -
• Productivity 1-2 drugs/10 reach market
• Budgets increase x30 since 1970 ($5billion /year)
• Revolutionary scientific advances in last 20 years, offering new and innovative opportunities
13 JORNADA TOX®
(Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
Pedro Cuatrecases, Drug discovery in jeopardy, 2006
The Attrition Problem
- Confidential - 14
Angela Dunne, GSK, 2011
The attrition rate for drug discovery programs from target to clinic is unacceptably high –Causes a lack of new medicines to treat diseases of high unmet need
–Results in inefficiency of drug discovery organizations, requiring large target portfolios to ensure sufficient medicine output
Significant contributors to attrition post-candidate are lack of efficacy and/or toxicity –Deployment of more physiological screens earlier in the drug discovery
process should make a significant impact in the overall attrition rate
The Attrition Problem
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
- Confidential - 15
Jim Kling, MSN Health & Fitness FDA agency failed to catch serious side effects in a number of drugs before they were approved, thus forcing embarrassing withdrawals
The Attrition Problem
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
Drug Company Indication Why Expiration date
Vioxx Merck
Painkiller CV events 2004
Bextra Pfizer
Painkiller CV events 2005
Zelnorm Novartis
IBS Heart problems 2007
Tysabri
Biogen Idec
MS Progressive multifocal
leukoencephalopathy
2005
Neurospec
Palatin Thec.
Appendicities
diagnosis
Life-threating side effects 2005
Cylert
Abbot
ADHA Liver failure 2005
Permax
Valentant
Parkinson Blood backlow to aortic valves 2007
Baycol
Bayer
Cholesterol Fatal rhabdomyolysis 2001
Palladone
Purde Pharma
Narcotic painkiller Sever effecst when taken with
alcohol
2005
- Confidential -
• Patient population is heterogeneous. Differ at genetic level with regard to drug transport, metabolism, expression of disease, etc
• Early testing using tissues, cells, are just partially predictive.
• Preclinical testing in animals models is modestly predictive of effects in humans
• To many repeats, mainly in Discovery
• Marketing
• Management
16
The Attrition Problem: reasons (I)
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
- Confidential - 17
Clinical Development
Preclinical Development
Candidate selection
On track?
JORNADA TOX® (Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)
Challenges
Increasing predictability and regulatory acceptance
of in silico / in vitro methods
Adding more knowledge to the drug discovery process, so as to make success more certain :
Genomics, proteomics, metabonomics Molecular toxicology Transgenic animal models Biomarkers Bioinformatics
The only way to reduce costs and reduce time to launch is by reducing repeats, at any stage.
Opportunities
Creating entirely new therapeutic approaches (gene therapy, antibody therapy, stem cells).
Pharmacogenomics–Drugs and dosage chosen based on genetic composition –‘personalised medicine
Help pharmaceutical companies to get their programmes to fail efficiently
- Confidential -
On track !
1. Olson H, 2000 : survey from 12 pharmaceutical companies with data compiled from 150 compounds with 221 Human Toxicity (HT) events reported. Positive HT concordance rate of 71% for rodent and nonrodent species
2. 1991- 40% of attrition was due to poor PK/BA
Implementation of sophisticated panels of early in vitro ADME
2000 – a reduction to 10%
3. Fresh from the biotech pipeline 2011 (Jim Klings):
Drugs approvals were up in 2011, reversing the trend, thanks to biologics
18 JORNADA TOX®
(Barcelona, 1 de febrer de 2013 - CERETOX)