Pre-proposal for qualitative research
-
Upload
johnpeterson2 -
Category
Documents
-
view
105 -
download
0
Transcript of Pre-proposal for qualitative research
Running head: PRE-PROPOSAL 1
Pre-Proposal: A Qualitative Research on Students’ Perception of Ecological Awareness
John Peterson
Keiser University
Dr. Andrea Thompson
EDR810 Qualitative Research
December 17, 2011
PRE-PROPOSAL 2
Pre-Proposal: A Qualitative Research on Students’ Perception of Ecological Awareness
I. Purpose of Study / Research Questions
The purpose of this phenomenological study is to gain an understanding of students’
perception of ecological awareness based on their lived experience in an ecological awareness
program. Global warming and climate change are influencing our planet in an unparalleled
manner, producing a need for better consciousness and answers to the environmental crisis
(DeGalan & Middlekauff, 2008). Students attending college are the future leaders with the
power to decide on the preservation of our planet, so it is fundamental that educational
institutions ensure that students are environmentally aware. A qualitative study on this issue is
relevant to this understanding, and this paper presents a study to describe the lived experience of
being a student exposed to ecological awareness. This study addresses the following research
questions:
1. What is it like being a student in an ecological awareness class?
2. What does it mean to be ecologically aware?
II. Literature Review
Without doubt, the world is facing an environmental crisis. The primary causes are
human-created environmental devastation, as Perlingieri (2009) explained, "massive destruction
of habitats, unsustainable uses of fuels, logging, mining, and overfishing, to name some of the
major ones. These are all done with gargantuan technologies that leave behind unmitigated
devastation" (Perlingieri, 2009, para. 1).
When combined with toxic pollution left by Bhopal, the Exxon Valdez oil spill, Three-
Mile Island, Chernobyl, and other nuclear-related occurrences, which will not go away, there is a
real danger to all the inhabitants of this planet (Perlingieri, 2009).
PRE-PROPOSAL 3
Although there is not much research on the subject of students' perception on
environmental awareness, some studies made a distinction by their relevance to the issues of
scholarship. Keller's (2007) field research paper on an investigation of the environmental
awareness of students in the US and Europe, based on 14 qualitative guided interviews, is one of
those. In this study Keller seeks to know "how the concrete actions of students correlate with
what they said about their values before" (p. 4) being exposed to an awareness on the
environmental crisis.
In the field research paper Keller described American student’s acceptance of having a
life experience in nature, and not giving value to environmental pollution, an acceptance stronger
in boys than girls, mostly because boys liked camping (Keller, 2007). In addition, Keller
described European students also “connected to a value of environmental protection” (p. 11) and
enjoying nature through walks and hiking.
This contact with nature is turning into a popular trend in education, especially in schools
with disciplines catering to environmental awareness. For example, Nic Mink, visiting assistant
professor of environmental studies at Knox College led a 10-day trip with nine Knox College
students to canoe and camp “through more than 100 miles of the Florida Everglades during
winter break, gaining first-hand knowledge of the deep connection between people and national
parks” (Knox College, 2011).
Storksdieck (2006) conducted a study in the role of out-of-school settings in education
for sustainability, where the author described field trips in environmental education as, "an
effective teaching tool in a variety of cognitive and affective learning dimensions" (p. 1) related
to environmental learning. Storksdieck defended the idea that out-of-school environmental
learning experiences strengthen the relationship between humans and their natural environment.
PRE-PROPOSAL 4
In the author's point of view there is "a lack of global environmental science knowledge" (p. 4),
which drives the need for models that influence pro-environmental behavior (Storksdieck, 2006).
O'Brien's (2007) thesis on "Indications of environmental literacy: Using a new survey
instrument to measure awareness, knowledge, and attitudes of university-aged students"
suggested that students, especially those in higher education, have a low-to-moderate level of
environmental knowledge.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The theoretical framework of this study consists of how important it is for students to be
aware of the current and potentially dangerous future ecological crisis and how they react to this
ecological awareness. This proposed phenomenological study aims to understand students’
perception of ecological awareness based on the principles guided by Whitehead's
Theory of Experience, which defends that “the feeling of actual things by actual things to be
absolutely basic to more high-grade and specialized experience” (Muirhead Library of
Philosophy, 2002, p. 268).
III. Research Design
According to Hancock (2002), "phenomenology literally means the study of phenomena"
(p.4). This study uses phenomenal methodology to understand the phenomena related to the
integration of student awareness of the environmental crisis, in order to answer the research
questions. Phenomenology is as much a philosophy as it is a type of qualitative research that
emphasizes “experience itself and how experiencing something is transformed into
consciousness” (Merriam, 2009, p. 24).
PRE-PROPOSAL 5
Methodology
The research question and the resources available for research will assist researchers in
selecting how to collect data (Devers & Frankel, 2000). Data is the information collected by the
researcher originating in the findings of the study; qualitative data is nominal, differing from
quantitative data, which is in most cases scalable. Qualitative researchers, over time, developed
a variety of ways to study human behavior (Gall, Borg, & Gall, 1996). These different
possibilities are coming from the disciplinary fields of anthropology, psychology, social
psychology, sociology, and education (Creswell, 1994). A researcher’s role in qualitative
research links to the nature of the study, which is interpretative research, and as such, there is the
risk for his or her judgmental bias and values influencing the study (Creswell, 1994).
Data collection will be through interviews. Seidman's (2006) recommended interviewing
in order to collect qualitative research data. However, interviews take time and resources;
interviewers have to be experienced in many different aspects of measurement instrumentation
(McNamara, 1999).
Devers and Frankel (2000) explained that in qualitative research the type of
instrumentation used when collecting qualitative data has pros and cons. "In most qualitative
research, the degree to which interviews and observations are structured varies. For example,
when conducting interviews, the researcher could use a very detailed interview protocol" (Devers
& Frankel, 2000, p. 267).
The way people can openly discuss their thoughts characterizes interviews. McNamara
(1999) explained that “interviews are particularly useful for getting the story behind a
participant’s experiences. The interviewer can pursue in-depth information around the topic.” In
PRE-PROPOSAL 6
addition, following up answers of responses on questionnaires and further investigating
responses gives even a larger importance to interviews (McNamara, 1999).
This study will adopt an in-depth, phenomenological based interview. According to
Seidman (2006) this method associates life-history interviewing with focused, in-depth
interviewing “informed by assumptions drawn from phenomenology” (p. 15).
The interviews will be structured to follow a three-interview series, as proposed by
Seidman.
1. The first interview will focus on a participant’s experience with sustainability and
environmental issues as a result of their lived experience in an ecological awareness
program. This will be done by asking questions related with their life experiences with
the issues.
2. The second interview will concentrate on the details of the lived experiences described in
the first interview.
3. The third and final interview will be based on the reflection on the meaning of their lived
experience. This reflection is the fruit of a connection between their daily lives and their
intellectual and emotional experiences in an ecological awareness program.
Data Analysis
Data analysis is the process of systematically applying statistical and/or logical
techniques to describe and demonstrate, compress and summarize, and evaluate data. According
to the Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center (n.d.) at Northern Illinois
University, "While data analysis in qualitative research can include statistical procedures, many
times analysis becomes an ongoing iterative process where data is continuously collected and
analyzed almost simultaneously" (para. 2).
PRE-PROPOSAL 7
Hancock (2002) wrote, "Analysis of data in a research project involves summarizing the
mass of data collected and presenting the results in a way that communicates the most important
features” (p. 16). In qualitative research, there is an interest in discovering the whole picture by
using data to explain a phenomenon and to express and understand what it means (Hancock,
2002).
Cheng (n.d.) explained, "Data management and analysis in qualitative research are ways to
store data, to categorize data, and "to make sense of the categories and to communicate the findings
to readers". Storing data techniques is sometimes critical to data management in qualitative
research. The actual data storing in qualitative research is initiated with the collection of data
(Cheng, n.d). According to Cheng (n.d.), to hold data the following containers of data can be used:
The human brain
Field notes
Tape recorders
Video recorders
In qualitative research, whatever comes in frequently in a random way has to be understood
by the researcher (Cheng, n.d.). Fritz (2008) elucidated that the following are effortless steps to
good data management: (a) “Choose and follow a clear file naming system”; (b) “develop a data
tracking system”; (c) “establish and document transcription/translation procedures”; (d)
“establish quality control procedures”; and (d) “establish a realistic timeline” (slide 4) .
Data analysis tends to be a continuing and interactive process in qualitative research.
Folkestad (2008) explained interview data analysis as a three-step process:
1. Data reduction, this starts at the very beginning of the research phase, when concepts
and methods are developed and subjects/ phenomena selected.
PRE-PROPOSAL 8
2. Data display, this step seeks meaning on a limited part of the data (summaries,
diagrams and text-matrices).
3. Conclusion, when the researcher compares, contrasts, and searches for patterns,
triangulation etc.
The researcher can check whether none, all, or some proportion of behaviors or events
occur under distinct circumstances. "The researcher can generate a preliminary model to explain
the data collected. Explanations place particular social facts in reference to their environment.
Further observations are then collected which can strengthen or weaken the researcher's
preliminary model" (Saint-Germain, 2002).
Throughout the entire process of qualitative data analysis, there will be an engagement in
memoing (i.e., recording reflective notes about what is learned from the data). In addition, there
will be a typed transcription of the data collected (from interviews, observational notes, memos,
etc.) into word-processing documents.
This study will analyze data with the assistance of the computer-assisted analyses of
qualitative data (known by the acronym CAQDAS). Although not perfect the following
advantages of CAQDAS justify this choice (Silverman, 2000):
Speed when handling large amounts of data
Better accuracy, as for example, searching deviant cases
Assist in team research, especially when conducting coding schemes
Support sampling decisions
Themes and Categories
Categorizing a study during its analysis is an efficient method of organizing information.
Although different from quantitative research coding categories function with the same purpose,
PRE-PROPOSAL 9
to help indexing the data. By reading the text in study researchers can identify themes that
elaborate ideas, behaviors, concepts, interactions, terminologies, incidents, and phrase used.
Categorizing a study also has the advantage of helping to organize these categories in a coherent
way bringing meaning and sense to the text. (Taylor-Powell & Renner, 2003).
Validity and Reliability
Reliability is linked to the quality of measurement (Trochi & Donnely, 2006), and
"Construct validity refers to the degree to which inferences can legitimately be made from the
operationalization in your study to the theoretical constructs on which those operationalization
were based" as elucidated by Trochi (2006, para. 1). Merriam (2009) explained that the best way
to achieve validity and reliability in qualitative research is through ethics.
Validity and reliability are connected to the manner which research is measured, and has
to rely in ethical integrity. It is very difficult for a qualitative researcher to maintain assumptions
about investigation free of bias. An ethical code would greatly assist on that.
Merriam listed "ten items to be considered when engaging in qualitative research"
(Merriam, 2009, pp. 233-234):
1. "Explaining purpose of the inquiry and methods to be used"
2. "Promises and reciprocity"
3. "Risk assessment"
4. "Confidentiality"
5. "Informed consent"
6. "Data access and ownership"
7. "Interviewer mental health"
8. "Advice (who will be your counselor on ethical matters)"
PRE-PROPOSAL 10
9. "Data collection boundaries"
10. "Ethical versus legal conduct".
Validity and reliability are major areas of concern in any research, especially in
qualitative studies (Creswell, 2007). Perhaps all researchers have the honest intent of producing
the best study they are capable of, having ethical believes and trust in results of investigations;
however, it is crucial that some form of ethical guidelines are followed, after all it is the
researcher's reputation on the line. This study will apply the following strategies to promote
validity and reliability, as suggested by Merriam (2009):
1. The use of variation and diversity in sample collection to permit a larger spectrum of
“applications of the findings by consumers of the research” (p. 229).
2. A well detailed description in order to provide readers an opportunity to examine if
their “situation match the research context” (p. 229).
3. And a critical self-reflection by the researcher regarding assumptions, bias, theoretical
involvement, and how close the researcher is to the study jeopardizing the research.
IV. Dissemination and Recommendations
All features of the findings on the qualitative data will be taken in consideration when
planning the presentation. Emerged themes and categories will be used to structure the results
section of the research report, because the data are "subjective, interpretative, descriptive, holistic
and copious and it can be difficult to know where or how to start" (Hancock, 2002, p. 22).
Following Hancock's (2002) advice, the structure will be defined at the beginning, “either
as a list or in diagrammatic form.” Then, the themes will be presented in sections with the
categories as sub-sections. Presenting in this way allows the categories of data to be used to
build the themes as the main findings of the study. In addition, as suggested by Hancock (2002),
PRE-PROPOSAL 11
additional verification to support the findings “will be provided by using direct quotations from
respondents.” Key quotations will be selected to illustrate the meaning of the data.
PRE-PROPOSAL 12
References
Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to
theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Cheng, K.M. (n.d.). Making sense of data in qualitative research. University of Hong Kong.
Retrieved from http://www.ssrc.hku.hk/web/
Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches
(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DeGalan, J., & Middlekauff, B. (2008). Great jobs for environmental studies majors. New York,
NY: McGraw-Hill.
Devers, K. J., & Frankel, R. M. (2000). Study design in qualitative research—2: Sampling and
data collection strategies. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice (Taylor
& Francis Ltd), 13(2), 263-271. doi:10.1080/13576280050074543
Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center (n.d.). Data analysis. Northern Illinois
University. Retrieved from
http://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/n_illinois_u/datamanagement/datopic.html
Folkestad, B. (2008). Analyzing interview data: Possibilities and challenges. EUROSPHERE
ONLINE WORKING PAPER SERIES. Retrieved from
http://www.eurosphere.uib.no/knowledgebase/workingpapers.htm
Fritz, K. (2008). Managing your qualitative data: 5 easy steps [PowerPoint]. Johns Hopkins
University. Retrieved from
http://ocw.jhsph.edu/courses/qualitativedataanalysis/PDFs/Session2.pdf
Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., & Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.).
White Plains, NY: Longman.
PRE-PROPOSAL 13
Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis
and applications (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hancock, B. (2002). Trent focus for research and development in primary health care: An
introduction to qualitative research. Sidney, Canada: Trend Focus.
Keller, D. (2007). Field research: Comparison of the environmental awareness of US- and
European students. Nordestedt, Germany: GRIN Velarg.
Knox College (2011). Knox students to canoe in Everglades, study nature. Retrieved from
http://www.knox.edu/news-and-events/news-archive/knox-students-to-canoe-in-
everglades-study-nature.html
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd. ed.). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
McNamara, C. (1999). General guidelines for conducting interviews. Minnesota, MN:
Authenticity Consulting.
Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Muirhead Library of Philosophy (2002). The relevance of Whitehead. London, England:
Routledge.
Myers, M. (2000, March). Qualitative research and the generalizability question: Standing
firm with Proteus. The Qualitative Report (4)3-4. Retrieved from
http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/myers.html
O'Brien, S.R.M. (2007). Indications of environmental literacy: Using a new survey instrument to
measure awareness, knowledge, and attitudes of university-aged students (Thesis). Iowa
State University. Retrieved from Pro-Quest.
PRE-PROPOSAL 14
Perlingieri, I.S. (2009, February 11). The worldwide environmental crisis gone missing: The
precautionary principle. Global Research. Retrieved from
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12268
Saint-Germain, M. (2002). Data collection strategies II: Qualitative research. California State
University Long Beach. Retrieved from
http://www.csulb.edu/~msaintg/ppa696/696quali.htm
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education
and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press/Columbia
University.
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Storksdieck, F. (2006). Field trips in environmental education. Berlin, Germany: BWV.
Taylor-Powell, E., & Renner, M. (2003). Analyzing qualitative data. University of Wisconsin-
Extension. Retrieved from http://learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs/g3658-12.pdf
Trochi, W. (2006). Construct validity. Retrieved from
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/constval.php
Trochi, W., & Donnely, J.P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Mason,
OH: Cengage Learning-Atomic Dog.