Pre-harvest Food Safety Research at Washington State ... · • Method: Gentamicin protection assay...
Transcript of Pre-harvest Food Safety Research at Washington State ... · • Method: Gentamicin protection assay...
Pre-harvest Food Safety Research at Washington State University- in a
Nutshell
Margaret A Davis DVM, MPH, PhD Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health
Veterinary Clinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine
Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164
I. E. coli O157:H7
– Genotypes
– Seasonality
II. Salmonella Enteritidis – virulence studies
III. Salmonellosis
– Bovine reservoir of MDR Salmonella
– Antibiotic resistance
IV. Campylobacter
• Clinical genotypes (CG) – isolated primarily from human clinical samples
• Bovine-biased genotypes (BBG) – isolated from bovine samples but rarely from human clinical samples
• Bovine isolates are more diverse – include both CG and BBG
• Many subtyping methods correlate well w.r.t. BBG v. CG
I. E. coli O157:H7
Dr. Tom Besser
E. coli O157:H7 subtyping methods • Lineage Specific Polymorphism Assay alleles
(LSPA, 6 loci, 18 potential alleles)
• Stx-encoding Bacteriophage Insertion Sites (SBI, 6 loci, 12 potential alleles)
• Presence or absence of stx2-Q933 and stx2-Q21 alleles
• Tir T255A SNP alleles
• SNP typing – 48 loci
Distribution of SBI genotypes
32%
2%64%
2%
0%
0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
Human Isolates, N=280
Distribution of SBI genotypes
10%
0%
42%
1%0%1%3%
11%1%
1%
3%
1%
19%
6% 1%
Bovine Isolates, N=80
Effect of on-farm interventions that have been studied may have been over- or under-estimated for CG strains of EcO157:
• Vaccines • DFM (Direct fed microbials, probiotics)
• Water trough hygiene • Feed type
• Winter v. summer • Feedlot v. dairy
Comparison of bovine Escherichia coli O157:H7 genotypes by production system (feedlot vs dairy), season (summer vs winter), source (fecal vs water), and sample type (fecal vs recto-anal junction). Woo Kyung Jung, Margaret A. Davis, and Thomas E. Besser Odds of CG Fecal v. RAJ: NS Other factors that will be analyzed: vaccinated v. unvaccinated cattle, probiotic use, grain type, days on feed.
OR 95% Confidence Interval
Feedlot/Dairy 11.3 (6.5 - 19.7)
Summer/Winter 6.5 (2.8 – 15.4)
Water/Fecal 3.0 (1.4 – 6.4)
Figure 1: Seasonal STEC human disease incidence and bovine prevalence. Human: mean reported cases 1998- 2007 (http://www.cdc.gov/ mmwr/mmwr_nd/index.html). Bovine: from Herriot et al. ; nine herds sampled monthly (~60 fecal samples per month) using standardized non-IMS methods.
Seasonality in cattle
• Extrinsic effects?
– Environmental proliferation in warmer temperatures
– Seasonal feed components
• Intrinsic effects?
– Immune responses
– Endocrine effects (day length) Dr. Carolyn Hovde Bohach
Two groups of 10, 9-month-old Holstein steers
Challenge with 109 cfu O157 (mixture of 4 strains):
Rectal challenge Oral challenge
Culture for O157 by Recto-Anal Mucosa Swab (RAMS) Days 1, 4, 7, and weekly, thereafter for 60 days
using SMAC-CTVM selective media
Genotype O157 isolates using a multiplexed PCR to determine the Stx-encoding prophage insertion sites
Trial completed TWICE in the Summer and Winter Seasons Will repeat TWICE more this Summer and Winter Seasons
• Regardless of season, cattle similarly challenged with E. coli O157:H7 shed similar numbers of bacteria for similar durations indicating the effect of season was due to exogenous factors
• No significant differences in duration or the concentration of E.
coli O157:H7 carried resulted from the different oral and rectal challenge methods indicating passage through the gastrointestinal tract was not a factor in these trials.
• Five cattle (ear-tag #s T2, T3, T7, T16, T17) remained culture positive for E. coli O157:H7 for long durations (>42 days) in both seasons, indicating that endogenous factors played a role in O157 carriage in individual animals.
• Bovine-biased genotype 6 (BBG6) predominated among the E. coli O157:H7 shed in both seasons indicating that bacterial factors played a role in bovine colonization.
II. S. Enteritidis virulence
S. Enteritidis in the United States
Sources: http://www.cdc.gov/ and Braden (2006) Clin. Infect. Dis. 43: 512-17
case
rat
e p
er 1
00
,00
0
Number 1 serotype of Salmonella isolated from cases of food borne infections Between 1985 and 1999
997 outbreaks
33,687 cases
328 hospitalizations
82 deaths Dr. Devendra Shah
Cell invasiveness of poultry-associated S. Enteritidis strains
Model: Well-differentiated Caco-2 cells
• Method: Gentamicin protection assay
• Outcome variable: Intracellular CFU
• Total # of strains: 53
3-d
ay o
ld
14
-day
old
Incubate at 37C in 5% CO2 for 2 h
Treat with Gentamicin (200 µg/ml)
Trypsinize cells
Determine the intracellular CFUs
Infect cells at 10 MOI
Poultry-associated strains of SE vary in cell invasiveness
• Low invasive strains show lowered virulence in a mouse model
• Low invasive strains have impaired motility
• Low invasive strains have impaired tolerance to acid
• Low invasive strains show impaired survival in chicken macrophages
III. Cattle-associated salmonellosis and antibiotic resistance
Dairy cattle are a reservoir for human MDR Salmonella infections
– Cornell collaboration
– Two-part comparison
Washington v. New York State 2004 - 2005
Odds Odds Ratio 95% CIb
bovine vs. human Newport 18.2 6.3 - 52.6
bovine vs. human Typhimurium 3.5 1.7 – 7.1
bovine Newport vs. bovine Typhimurium 6.1 2.1 - 17.9
human Newport vs. human Typhimurium 1.2 0.6 - 2.2
Northwest vs. Northeast isolates 2.0 1.2 - 3.4
Odds ratio estimates for odds of multidrug resistance based on nominal logistic regression model
Hoelzer et al. AEM 2010;76(17):5947-59.
Northeast
N (%)
Northwest
N (%)
Χ2 P-value
Newport % Suscept 36 (52.2) 60 (36.8) <.05
% MDR 33 (47.8) 99 (60.7) .07
Typhimurium % Suscepta 154 (72.0) 51 (16.0) <.0001
%MDRb 47 (22.0) 223 (69.9) <.0001
Bovine Human
Newport % Suscept 36 (31.6) 60 (50.9) <.05
% MDR 76 (66.7) 56 (47.5) <.05
Typhimurium % Suscept 60 (35.7) 145 (39.7) .4
% MDR 100 (59.5) 170 (46.6) <.05
Table 2. Proportions of Salmonella enterica serotypes Newport and Typhimurium
that were susceptible to all antibiotics and that were multi-drug resistant, by region
and species affected.
a Suscept, susceptible to all antibiotics tested. bMDR, multi-drug resistant. Resistant to two or more classes of antibiotics.
For both projects:
• All isolates were compared using – Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)
– Multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVA)
– Similarities combined cluster analysis in Bionumerics (Applied Maths, Austin, TX)
• Isolates indistinguishable by both methods were detected from different host species and regions:
Salmonella Newport isolates 2004-2005
Proportions of human Salmonella isolates indistinguishable from
bovine isolates by PFGE and MLVA combined
• Human isolates more likely to match bovine isolates in
the NW than in the NE (2004-2009):
Serotype NY WA P-value
NEWPORT 5/65 (7.7%) 28/118 (23.7%) <0.01
TYPHIMURIUM 3/191 (1.6%) 19/294 (6.5%) <0.01
Direct transmission between cattle and humans > foodborne route
– Case-case study
– Cummings KJ et al, EID (In press)
• Case=salmonellosis associated with bovine PFGE type – Had to match PFGE profile from >=2 bovine
animals
• Control=salmonellosis associated with non-bovine PFGE type – Serotype or PFGE profile never found in
Salmonella from bovine animals
• Interviews conducted by local health department staff with more precise questions about animal exposures
Variable Odds Ratio 95% Confidence
Interval
p-value
Farm animal contact 3.1 (1.6, 6.0) 0.0005
Undercooked ground beef 1.7 (0.9, 3.5) 0.1
Unpasteurized milk 0.5 (0.1, 3.9) 0.5
1
Variable Odds Ratio 95% Confidence
Interval
p-value
Bovine contact 5.2 (2.0, 13.3) 0.0005
Undercooked ground beef 1.8 (0.9, 3.5) 0.1
Unpasteurized milk 0.6 (0.1, 4.7) 0.6
1
• Are bovine-associated salmonella infections more likely to be MDR?
Washington cases and controls
Case Control
Resistant to 3 or more drug classes)
11 23
Resistant to 0 to 2 drug classes 39 197
50 220
Odds ratio = 2.3 (1.1, 5.3)
Summary
• Salmonella enterica are more likely to be MDR
– From cattle than from humans
– In the NW compared to the NE
– In serotype Newport than Typhimurium (sometimes)
• Cattle and humans are more likely to have the same subtypes
– In the NW compared to the NE
Summary (cont’d)
• Direct transmission may be a more important route of exposure for humans than the foodborne route
• Human infections with bovine-associated strains are more likely to be MDR in WA
How do new MDR Salmonella strains get introduced into herds?
Adhikari B, et al. The role of animal movement, including off-farm rearing of heifers, in the interherd transmission of multidrug-resistant Salmonella. J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4229-38. PubMed PMID: 19700684.
Dr. Dale Hancock
• 59 dairy herds X 7 visits e 2 – 4 months
• Samples cultured for Salmonella
• Subtyping by PFGE
Factors not associated with the introduction of new MDR Salmonella strains were housing of heifers and cows in the same close-up pen, a common hospital-maternity pen, and the number of purchased cattle. This study highlights the role of animal movement in the interherd transmission of MDR Salmonella spp.
OR (95% CI)
Off-farm heifer raising, including commingling
8.9 (2.4, 32.8)
Herd size per 100-animal increment
1.04 (1.01 – 1.05)
Calf health and antibiotic resistance
Association between antimicrobial use and diarrhea in preweaned calves
Berge AC, Moore DA, Besser TE, Sischo WM. Targeting therapy to minimize antimicrobial use in preweaned calves: effects on health, growth, and treatment costs. J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4707-14.
Dr. Berge Dr. Sischo
Average daily gain
Current project: USDA-NIFSI funded Minimizing antimicrobial resistance
transmission: The dairy farm as a model system
• Communication model – What is the direction of information flow on large
dairies?
– How can we effectively deliver messages about minimal antimicrobial use?
• Calf housing – Exploring the effect of hutch row configuration on
transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria
• Wm Sischo, Dale Moore, Cornell Collaborators
Possible mechanisms for resistance transmission
Prevalence of resistance to cephalosporins; S. Dublin
Davis et al. 2007
Adhikari 2009
Signature for selection from ceftiofur is limited in the gut
Daniels et al. 2009
Ceftiofur
• Used to treat respiratory disease and foot-rot in cattle
• Injectable, converted to ‘CFM’ within minutes
• 70% excreted in urine; 30% in feces
• Metabolite is inactivated in feces
Dr. Doug Call
Bioavailability of different antibiotics can vary dramatically in soil
Subbiah et al. 2011b
IV. Campylobacter
2006 15.6/100,000
Methods
• Case-control study
– Cases interviewed by Whatcom and Yakima Counties Health Department personnel
– Controls identified by RDD and interviewed by staff of WSU Social and Economic Sciences Survey Center (SESRC)
– Matched by age category and county of residence
– Asked about food, recreation and animal related exposures in the 2 weeks prior to interview/illness
Methods
• Analysis: Conditional logistic regression analysis in SAS/PC v. 9 (Cary, SC)
• Period of study: February, 2009 – Aug, 2010
• 176 cases and 214 controls
Exposures not found to have a significant association
• Outdoor recreation (camping, hiking, yard work, hunting)
• Recreational water exposure
• Drinking water source (well v. public water supply)
• Pets at home
• Contact with sheep, goats, pigs, camelids
• Eating undercooked poultry*
Results of conditional logistic regression analysis
Multivariate conditional regression analysisa
Exposure Odds
ratio
95% C.I.
Male gender 0.6 (0.3, 1.2)
Hispanic ethnicity 7.0 (3.5, 14.3)
Lived/worked on a dairy farm 7.3 (1.6, 33.0)
Ate poultry 0.2 (0.1, 0.5)
Live poultry 2.4 (0.9, 6.3)
Handled raw poultry 0.2 (0.1, 0.7)
Ate restaurant food 2.3 (1.0, 4.9)
a Consumption of unpasteurized dairy products was removed from the
model by the stepwise procedure.
Genetic subtyping of Washington State Campylobacter isolates from cattle, humans and retail chicken
• Multilocus sequence typing
– Dingle et al. Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:14-23.
– Submission of allele data to PubMLST
• http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/
– Sequence types (ST) and clonal complexes (CC) are assigned
Host association (Washington) of human isolates’ specific sequence types (ST)
BOVINE 23
NEITHER 33
POULTRY 9
Total human isolates 65
Bovine Human Poultry
Clonal
Complex
WA PubML
ST
WA PubML
ST
WA PubML
ST
ST-21 40 38 17 20 21
ST-22 6 4 1 1
ST-283 1 1 8 1
ST-353 9 13 9
ST-443 14 4 5 5
ST-45 3 8 2 7 11 7
ST-48 4 7 6 9 2 2
ST-61 7 10 1 1
Total 95 63 65 56 27 45
Frequency of C.jejuni MLST clonal complexes from WA compared to PUBMLST databasea 2008-2011.
Thank you
MLST Results Clonal Complex Bovine Retail
chicken
Human clinical Total
- 11 7 18
PENDING 2 2
ST-179 COMPLEX 1 1
ST-21 COMPLEX 40 17 57
ST-22 COMPLEX 6 4 10
ST-257 COMPLEX 7 7
ST-283 COMPLEX 8 1 9
ST-353 COMPLEX 9 9
ST-354 COMPLEX 2 2
ST-403 COMPLEX 1 1
ST-42 COMPLEX 14 4 18
ST-443 COMPLEX 5 1 6
ST-45 COMPLEX 3 11 2 16
ST-460 COMPLEX 2 2
ST-464 COMPLEX 1 1
ST-48 COMPLEX 4 2 6 12
ST-49 COMPLEX 1 1
ST-508 COMPLEX 2 2 4
ST-52 COMPLEX 1 1
ST-607 COMPLEX 2 2
ST-61 COMPLEX 7 1 8
TOTAL 95 27 65 187