Prague day-1-test

73
WITNESS.org WITNESS uses video to open the eyes of the world to human rights violations Making Your Video Advocacy Successful March 7-10, 2011 Chris Michael, WITNESS Video Advocacy Training Manager

description

 

Transcript of Prague day-1-test

  • WITNESS uses video to open the eyes of the world
    to human rights violations
    Making Your Video Advocacy Successful
    March 7-10, 2011
    Chris Michael, WITNESS
    Video Advocacy Training Manager
  • WHO ARE WE?
    Name
    Where you live
    Why youre here
    Experience with video for advocacy
    Demonstrate your favorite facial expression
  • WHAT ARE WE DOING?
    Learn WITNESS Video Advocacy Methodology
    Review (successful) case studies
    Ensure you leave with a Video Action Plan
    Practice filming best practices
    Develop safety, security and informed consent best practices
    What else?
  • DAY 1
    Review our experience of effective video advocacy
    Explore strengths and limitations of video
    Look at methodologies for using video for change
    Introduce the Video Action Plan
    Filming exercise
  • DAY 2
    Video advocacy case study review
    Storytelling discussion and exercises
    Start developing your Video Action Plan
    Introduce safety, security and consent
    Filming exercises
  • DAY 3
    Explore innovative uses of video for change
    Overview of editing and tips to film like an editor
    Finalize* your video action plan & share it
  • WITNESS: VIDEO FOR CHANGE
    19years
    75countries
    250partner organizations
    1000s of human rights defenders
    4000hours of archived human rights footage
  • HARNESSING TECHNOLOGY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
    EQUIPPING
    cameras & tools
    EMPOWERING
    training human rights defenders
    ENABLING
    growing P2P networks
  • TRAJECTORY OF VIDEO
  • THE GAME CHANGER
  • TOOLS FOR A REASON
    JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN, DOESNT MEAN YOU SHOULD.
    - My (most incredible) mom
    Tactics that optimally support the advocacy.
    Tools that optimally support the tactic.
    All should both build and harness power - and be integrated.
  • VIDEO ADVOCACY
    Video advocacy is about effectively using the power of stories, visual evidence and personal testimony as part of a human rights advocacy strategy to engage people to act and create change in human rights law, policy, practice and behavior.
  • EXERCISE
    In a group of three-four persons, share an experience of video being used for human rights advocacy.
    Discuss together in the small group what made it effective.
    After ten minutes, well hear a sample of the examples.
  • WITNESS TOP 5
    Video made for a reason, not about something
    Video made for a specific audience
    Video with a clear and doable request for action from the audience
    Video with a strong message and the best messengers to move the audience to action
    Video that can, and will, be seen by the audience
  • FOR WITNESS, VA IS NOT
    A substitute for other advocacy tools: reports, mobiles, lobbying, etc.
    Used primarily as a publicity, educational or training tool
    Just for professional filmmakers or journalists or media experts
    Necessarily dependent on strong graphic imagery for impact
    3/7/11
    14
  • EXERCISE
    In a group of three-four persons, use the example of the film and your own experience to discuss the strengths and limitations of video being used for human rights advocacy.
    Note your ideas on post-its using no more than 4-5 words try to identify 3-4 advantages and 3-4 limitations
    After ten minutes, well gather the post-its on the wall and see what groupings emerge
  • STRENGTHS
    Show or contextualize a violation or its aftermath
    2) Put a face on human rights advocacy by telling a personal story
    3) Compress, contrast and juxtapose situations
    4) Use emotional power to communicate to an audience
    5) Detail specific cases or incidents that are emblematic of patterns
    6) Be a democratic and participatory medium
    7) Serve as a shield
    LIMITATIONS/SHORTCOMINGS
    1) Depends on access to places and people
    2) Limitations in covering structural issues
    3) Weak for deep quantitative analysis and complex procedural issues
    4) Technological divide still exists and does not change/remove issues of representation, and process can be less participatory during editing
    5) Can jeopardize lives
    Advocacy and Propaganda?
    3/7/11
    16
  • BREAK
  • WITNESS: Methodology
    Start with the Advocacy Objective
    Focus on Audiences
    Solutions and a Space for Action
    Safety and Security
  • Landmarks of a Video Advocacy Campaign
    Safety, Security & Consent
    Advocacy Goal
    Target Audiences
    Message
    Story
    Distribution
    Archive
    Impact Evaluation
  • Location/Partner: Paraguay, Mental Disability Rights International
    Objective: Secure precautionary measures to protect two named individuals; and push for long-term reform with community-based model
    Audience: Inter-American Commission for Human Rights, footage sequenced for mass media usage
  • Advocacy Objective
    Audience
    Message
    Contextualize in/or Create Narratives with Action Opportunities
    Circulation, Distribution and Viewing Approach
    Evaluate
    Participation/Safety
  • Objective
    Audience
    Message
    Contextualize in/or Create Narratives with Action Opportunities
    Circulation, Distribution and Viewing Approach
    Evaluate
    Location/Partner: Paraguay, Mental Disability Rights International
    Objective: Secure precautionary measures to protect two named individuals; and push for long-term reform with community-based model
    Audience: Inter-American Commission for Human Rights
    Participation/Safety
    /
    Message: Abuses in this facility are breaches of international law, and require immediate action
    Story: Told via the emblematic stories of two minors, framed by international law
    Timing/Distribution: For usage before Commission; and footage to be used in news coverage of decision
    Impact: Presidential action to secure improved conditions for named minors; reform of the psychiatric system
  • Location/Partner: Croatia
    Association for Promoting Inclusion (API)
    Objective:To raise awareness about the rights of people with intellectual disabilities; secure officials commitment to social inclusion and establishment of community-based social care programs.
    Audience: Health care, social services, elected officials -> UN
    Objective
    Audience
    Message
    Contextualize in/or Create Narratives with Action Opportunities
    Circulation, Distribution and Viewing Approach
    Evaluate
    Participation/Safety
    /
  • Location/Partner: Croatia
    Association for Promoting Inclusion (API)
    Objective:To raise awareness about the rights of people with intellectual disabilities; secure officials commitment to social inclusion and establishment of community-based social care programs.
    Audience: Health care, social services, elected officials -> UN
    Message: Over institutionalizing persons with intellectual disabilities; challenging stereotypes; policy change is needed
    Story: Told via the emblematic stories of two lovers, framed by rights
    Timing/Distribution: Key decision makers; direct service providers; UN
    Impact: Croatia one of first 5 nations to sign UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities
    Objective
    Audience
    Message
    Contextualize in/or Create Narratives with Action Opportunities
    Circulation, Distribution and Viewing Approach
    Evaluate
    Participation/Safety
    /
  • STEP 1: SMART OBJECTIVES
    Establish the purpose of the video within broader advocacy strategy
    Set clear and specific objectives for the video, specifying what they are, and how they can be achieved
  • SMART Objectives
    Specific
    Measurable
    Achievable
    Realistic
    Time-bound
  • NOT Specific: Empower students to do environmental accountability research in Brazil
    Specific: Provide technological support to Brazilian film students to help document corporate violations of environmental laws in south and southeast Brazil and place this evidence before national stakeholders including
    NOT Measurable: The video screening should evoke more uplifting responses from the public.
    Measurable: The video screening will secure a 15% increase in participation in local community dialogue in this location over the next six months.
    NOT Achievable: The video will make officials act to push for ratification of the Kyoto Protocol.
    Achievable: During our advocacy briefing, we will provide a video report with accompanying recommendations for interim steps to support the upcoming legislative debate on ratification.
    NOT Realistic: Attendance at our video events will quadruple last years attendance.
    Realistic: We should aim for a 5% increase in attendance for this years video event while maintaining our routine efforts.
    NOT Time-bound: We hope the anti-discrimination law passes as soon as possible.
    Time-bound: We aim to have the anti-discrimination law passed by August 1st, 2009.
  • STEP 2: TARGET AUDIENCES
    Who has an influence on your advocacy goal? Who should be reached and persuaded?
    What is their perspective or attitude to the issue?
    What is their level of awareness?
    What is their level of knowledge?
    Who are your secondary audiences who can pressure your primary audience?
    • Evidentiary
    • Decision-maker lobbying
    • Interventions in formal HR monitoring
    • Community organizing offline and online
    • Solidarity organizing online and offline
    • Mass mobilization
    • Mass media attention
    .
  • STEP 3: STRATEGIC MESSAGES
    Resonate & Compel
    What are the 1-5 key facts / sentences / points that will resonate with your audience and thus must be in your documentary?
  • KEY QUESTIONS
    What is the message you need to get to this audience?
    Are you educating, engaging or activating?
    What story will be persuasive, compelling or motivating for this audience?
    What voices is it important to have in the video in order to have political, ethical, analytical and emotional credibility and impact?
  • REVIEWING VIDEOS
    What is the Objective of the video?
    What is the Audience of the video?
    What is the Message of the video?
    What is the Story of the video?
    What is the request for action?
  • CASE STUDY: On The Frontines
    Partner/Location:Ajedi-Ka, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo
    Objective:Reduce voluntary recruitment of children into militia and armed groups
    Audience:Community members in eastern Congo in areas at risk of recruitment
    Message:
    Story/Voices:
    Distribution:
    Impact:
  • CASE STUDY: On The Frontines
    Partner/Location:Ajedi-Ka, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo
    Objective:Reduce voluntary recruitment of children into militia and armed groups
    Audience:Community members in eastern Congo in areas at risk of recruitment
    Message: Participation in the militia has short and long-term consequences for children and is not in their best interests
    Story/Voices: Young people talk about the impact on them and we see visual evidence from the camps
    Distribution: In community screenings across eastern Congo
    Impact:Reduction in voluntary recruitment; later videos contribute to prioritization of issue at international level
  • CASE STUDY: A Duty To Protect
    Partner/Location:Ajedi-Ka, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo
    Objective:
    Audience:Opinion-formers at international level including ICC investigators themselves
    Message:
    Story/Voices:
    Distribution:
    Impact:
  • CASE STUDY: A Duty To Protect
    Partner/Location:Ajedi-Ka, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo
    Objective:Encourage the ICC to prioritize the issue of child soldiers and sexual violence in its investigation in DRC(and also to invest in community outreach)
    Audience:Opinion-formers at international level including ICC investigators themselves
    Message: i) Child soldiers should be a priority issue for the ICC as well as sexual violence against girl soldiers + ii) More community outreach is needed in eastern Congo iii) Call for US engagement
    Story/Voices: Through the stories of two young women framed by an authoritative narrator
    Distribution: Shown internationally and to ICC officials
    Impact:Contributed to prioritization of issue at international level including at ICC in first prosecution
  • STEP 4: RIGHT STORY
    1. Condense your story to one sentence.
    2. How will you tell the story? Knowing your audience you can now choose:
    Voices who is included? who is excluded?
    Style MTV vs. News vs. ?
    Structure beginning -> middle -> end -> ACTION
    A/V Elements what sound and visuals are in it?
    Length driven by your primary audience(!)
    Language driven by your primary audience(!)
    SPACE FOR ACTION and clear request for it
  • Case Study: Missing Lives
    Location/Partners: Chechnya with Memorial Human Rights Center offices in the North Caucasus (Chechnya, Dagestan, Ingushetia, North Ossetia)
    Objective: Push for official action to end impunity and provide redress for the crimes of enforced disappearances, torture, and extrajudicial killings.
    Audience: Government of the Russian republics in the North Caucasus; Prosecutors' Offices; Ombudsman of the Russian Federation; Federal and local government officials; European and international policy makers; solidarity groups
    Message:
    Story:
    Voices:
  • Case Study: Missing Lives
    Location/Partners: Chechnya with Memorial Human Rights Center offices in the North Caucasus (Chechnya, Dagestan, Ingushetia, North Ossetia)
    Objective: Push for official action to end impunity and provide redress for the crimes of enforced disappearances, torture, and extrajudicial killings.
    Audience: Government of the Russian republics in the North Caucasus; Prosecutors' Offices; Ombudsman of the Russian Federation; Federal and local government officials; European and international policy makers; solidarity groups
    Message: Need to break through the system of lawlessness surrounding the crimes of disappearances
    Story: Insight into damage done in the lives of people whose loved have vanished; A survivor of abduction and torture speaks about his ordeal at the prison site
    Voices: Relatives of the missing people, a torture survivor
    Distribution approach: Used in public screenings in Chechnya, Russia, and international advocacy fora
  • STEP 5: STRATEGIC DISTRO
    Who are your distribution allies?
    Timing: Is there a key premiere date?
    Sequencing: What are your distribution opps?
    Choosing the right messenger
  • 5 NEW(ISH) USES OF VIDEO
    Pocket-power: Mobile Phones
    Immediate: Livestreaming video
    Amplify: User-generated voices
    Geo-specific: Location-mapped video
    Remixing advocacy videos
  • CAPTURING ABUSES
  • DOCUMENT: LIVESTREAMING
  • USER-GENERATED SWARM
  • USER-GENERATED SWARM
  • NOT SO FAST
  • WHOS AT RISK HERE?
  • EGYPT
  • IRAN
  • SPOTLIGHT: FIVE TRENDSaffecting human rights advocacy
    Accessibility
    Participation
    Accountability
    Amplification
    Mobilization
  • STRONG FOUNDATION
    Good Stories & Storytelling for Change
    Know Your Audience
    Message -> Story -> Action
    Use & Enhance Best Practices
    + Safety & Security
    + Informed Consent
  • WITNESS.org
    WITNESS.org/training
    [email protected]
  • CASE STUDIES
  • Watch the video as a critical viewer, thinking about its objective, audience, message, story and voices.
    After watching the video take ten minutes to discuss it with your neighbors what do you identify as the message, story and voices?
    After ten minutes, well hear a sample of the discussions
  • Case Study: Books Not Bars
    Location/Partners: California with Ella Baker Center For Human Rights
    Objective: Mobilize support around initiatives to confront the prison-industrial complex
    Audience: Youth activists
    Message:
    Story:
    Voices:
    Distribution approach:
  • Case Study: Books Not Bars
    Location/Partners: California with Ella Baker Center For Human Rights
    Objective: Mobilize support around initiatives to confront the prison-industrial complex
    Audience: Youth activists
    Message: You are directly affected by this system, you need to challenge it, and have the power to win
    Story: Told through a series of narratives of youth activism including success stories
    Voices: Primarily youth and supportive activists and academics
    Distribution approach: To be screened in organizing settings often alongside music and spoken word; paired with teaching pack for use in schools
  • Case Study: CEMIRIDE Evidentiary Video
    Location/Partners: Kenya with CEMIRIDE and Minority Rights Group
    Objective: Secure ruling from African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights on displacement of Endorois people from their ancestral lands in Kenya
    Audience: African Commission, to be followed up with a public engagement campaign using a different version of video
    Message: Endorois people have suffered violations of their rights under specific articles of the African Charter
    Story:
    Voices:
    Distribution approach: Screened at African Commission alongside legal submission and in-person advocacy
  • Case Study: CEMIRIDE Evidentiary Video
    Location/Partners: Kenya with CEMIRIDE and Minority Rights Group
    Objective: Secure ruling from African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights on displacement of Endorois people from their ancestral lands in Kenya
    Audience: African Commission, to be followed up with a public engagement campaign using a different version of video
    Message: Endorois people have suffered violations of their rights under specific articles of the African Charter
    Story: Focused on showing the daily life of Endorois today contrasted to specific treaty obligations of Kenya government
    Voices: Lead by young man, with voices of other ages
    Distribution approach: Screened at African Commission alongside legal submission and in-person advocacy
  • Case Study: Crying Sun
    Location/Partners: Chechnya with Memorial Human Rights Center office in Grozny
    Objective: Secure the return of villagers to their homes in the Caucasus Mountains; Push for the establishment of programs to restore the cultural heritage; Investigate the abduction of four Zumsoy residents and prosecute the perpetrators
    Audience: Chechen government officials and administrations of local districts; Prosecutors and Ombudsmans; European and international policy makers; solidarity groups
    Message: War is destroying the unique aspect of Chechen culture - secure return of villagers to their ancestral homes
    Story: Told by Zumsoy villagers and portrays their struggle to preserve cultural identity and traditions in the context of military raids and enforced disappearances
    Voices: Chechen villagers, local school principal, teacher
    Distribution approach: Used in communal and individual screenings in Chechnya, Russia, and international advocacy fora
  • Case Study: Missing Lives
    Location/Partners: Chechnya with Memorial Human Rights Center offices in the North Caucasus (Chechnya, Dagestan, Ingushetia, North Ossetia)
    Objective: Push for official action to end impunity and provide redress for the crimes of enforced disappearances, torture, and extrajudicial killings.
    Audience: Government of the Russian republics in the North Caucasus; Prosecutors' Offices; Ombudsman of the Russian Federation; Federal and local government officials; European and international policy makers; solidarity groups
    Message: Need to break through the system of lawlessness surrounding the crimes of disappearances
    Story: Insight into damage done in the lives of people whose loved have vanished; A survivor of abduction and torture speaks about his ordeal at the prison site
    Voices: Relatives of the missing people, a torture survivor
    Distribution approach: Used in public screenings in Chechnya, Russia, and international advocacy fora
  • Case Study: Duty to Protect
    Location/Partners: DRC with Ajedi-Ka, P.E.S.
    Objective: Encourage ICC Prosecutors Office to prioritize issues of child soldiers and sexual violence in its initial charges in DRC
    Audience: Officials and prosecutors at the ICC, international audiences concerned about DRC and ICC
    Message: Need for focus on sexual violence within ICC investigations; need for ICC outreach offices in eastern DRC; call to US for engagement
    Story: Told through stories of two young women affected by sexual violence
    Voices: Young women, and voice of a human rights advocate
    Distribution approach: Used in communal and individual screenings in US, and at ICC, as well as worldwide subsequently
  • Drafting a Video Action Plan
    You will need to identify:
    Objective?
    Audience?
    Message?
    Timing/Sequencing?
    Strategy for Participation
  • Location/Partner: India, Chintan with IMAK and Video Volunteers
    Advocacy objective:Support the rights to livelihood of waste-pickers in Delhi
  • CASE STUDY: Counterbalance
    Location/Partner: India, Chintan with IMAK and Video Volunteers
    Human rights advocacy objective:Support the rights to livelihood of waste-pickers in Delhi
    Message::An alternative model exists that provides for workers livelihoods and is cost-effective
    Story/Voices: :Waste-pickers from New Delhi Municipal Council and Municipal Corporation of Delhi; public health professional
    Distribution: To be shown individually to key members of the Delhi.
    Impact: To be determined
  • Location/Partner: Burma, Burma Issues
    Objective:Support the push to refer Burma to the UNSC under threat to the peace
    Message: Actions of Burmas military regime in eastern Burma are a threat to the peace
    Story/ Voices:Condensed summary of situation, with emblematic story of one older woman
    Timing/Distribution: :Used in solidarity organizing and shown to officials in Indonesia, UK, USA and at UN, alongside presentations. Also viewed almost a million times on YouTube.
    Impact:Supported organizing work; ultimately no referral to UNSC
  • CASE STUDY: Bound by Promises
    Location/Partner: Brazil, CPT and CEJIL
    Human rights advocacy objective:Propose and support a series of national and state level solutions to challenge use of forced labor including better enforcement, stronger penalties and economic opportunities for workers
    Message:
    Story/Voices:
    Distribution:
    Impact: units
  • CASE STUDY: Bound by Promises
    Location/Partner: Brazil, CPT and CEJIL
    Human rights advocacy objective:Propose and support a series of national and state level solutions to challenge use of forced labor including better enforcement, stronger penalties and economic opportunities for workers
    Message: Forced labor continues in rural areas, and solutions are on the table
    Story/Voices: A composite of voices from forced laborers and their families, as well as key experts
    Distribution: Screenings alongside advocacy to policymakers at state and national level; broad public attention via television broadcast
    Impact:Reinstitution of mobile monitoring units
  • CASE STUDY: An Age for Justice
    Partner/Location:National Council on Aging, USA
    Objective:Secure passage of Elder Justice ACT
    Audience: Key members of US House of Representatives and direct service providers
    Message:
    Story/Voices:
    Distribution:
    Impact:
  • CASE STUDY: An Age for Justice
    Partner/Location:National Council on Aging, USA
    Objective:Secure passage of Elder Justice ACT
    Audience: Key members of US House of Representatives and direct service providers
    Message: Elder Abuse is prevalent; it is preventable; Elder Justice Act is primary solution
    Story/Voices: Affected persons; service providers; legislators
    Distribution: Direct screenings with key decision makers; mass distribution with 100 unique videos
    Impact:Contributed to passage of Elder Justice Act (part of Health Reform Act, 2010)
  • Think like a Human Rights Advocate and a Video Activist
    Find a compelling story that you can tell visually, and through testimony
    Identify compelling individuals who want to tell their story
    Look for telling details that highlight your story and advocacy goals
    Be truthful and ethical
    Make the process empowering for people involved with the video and maintain the integrity of your footage
    Build the story within a human rights framework and ensure the video can be used as an advocacy tool
  • Case Study: Hear Us: Women Affected by Political Violence in Zimbabwe Speak Out
  • STRENGTHS
    Show or contextualize a violation or its aftermath
    2) Put a face on human rights advocacy by telling a personal story
    3) Compress, contrast and juxtapose situations
    4) Use emotional power to communicate to an audience
    5) Detail specific cases or incidents that are emblematic of patterns
    6) Be a democratic and participatory medium
    7) Serve as a shield
    LIMITATIONS/SHORTCOMINGS
    1) Depends on access to places and people
    2) Limitations in covering structural issues
    3) Weak for deep quantitative analysis and complex procedural issues
    4) Technological divide still exists and does not change/remove issues of representation, and process can be less participatory during editing
    5) Can jeopardize lives
    Advocacy and Propaganda?
    3/7/11
    72