PRACTICAL ISSUES OF GRINDINGdocuments.epfl.ch/users/s/st/ston/www/7 Grinding.pdf · to ball mill,...

24
www.LC3.ch PRACTICAL ISSUES OF GRINDING 1 PALAS KUMAR HALDAR 30 th June2015 LC 3 Doctoral school

Transcript of PRACTICAL ISSUES OF GRINDINGdocuments.epfl.ch/users/s/st/ston/www/7 Grinding.pdf · to ball mill,...

www.LC3.ch

PRACTICAL ISSUES OF GRINDING

1

PALAS KUMAR HALDAR

30th June2015

LC3 Doctoral school

Studies

• B.Sc in Chemistry • B.Tech in Ceramics • M. Tech in Ceramics• MBA in Operation research• PhD area- Electro ceramics

2

About myself

Experience

• Assistant general manager (technology management) in TARA from April’2014 onwards

• Senior Design engineer in TDKfrom November’2006 to March’2014.

• Area of experience- R&D, Quality, process, production & environment product quality management (EPQM)

Contents Introduction Objectives Types of comminution Theory of grinding Grinding energy and efficiency Grinding factors Hardness LC3 production in India Conclusions

3

Introduction

• Grinding is a part of comminution which involves size reduction of materials by various forces like impact, shear ,abrasion, compaction etc.

• Crushing is normally accomplished by compression/compaction of the materials against rigid surface.

• Grinding involves impact , shear & abrasion of particles by grinding media.

• Intergrinding usually implies to grind together when two or more different materials are present in the system. ( cement blending by ballmill)

4

Objectives To prepare the sample by reducing size for further processing

To improve surface area of the particles leading to higher reactivity

To separate impurities from valuable materials ( mineral processing)/ concentration

5

Types of Comminution

6

Comminution

Crushing

Primary crushing(1m>P80>100mm)

Secondary crushing(100mm>P80>6mm)

Grinding

Coarse grinding(6mm>P80>500µ)

Fine grinding(500µ-> P80> 5µ)

Jaw crusherCone crusher

Hammer crusherGyratory Crusher

Ball mill

Ball millVertical roller mill

Hammer millRod mill

Attrition mill

Jaw crusher

7

Ball mill

Jaw crushing

8

Ball milling

Theory of grinding Work index

The amount of energy (KWh/t) required to reduce a material from one size to another size. Higher work index indicates more hardness of the material.

Kick’s law (d> 50mm)Wk = cK [ln(dF)-ln(dP)]

Bond’s law (50mm>d>0.05mm)WB = CB(1/√dP - 1/√dF)

Rittenger’s law ( d< 0.05 mm)WR = CR(1/dP - 1/dF)

9

• W - work index• C - Grinding coefficient• dP - Product size(d80)• dF - Feed size(d80)• CK - 1.151CB(dBu)-0.5

• CR - 0.5CB(dBu)0.5

Average work index

10

Grinding energy & efficiency

Energy required during grinding (Bond’s law)E= 10WB (1/√dP - 1/√dF)

Efficiency of different grinding devices• Beater mills - 17% ÷ 25%• Roller mills - 7% ÷ 15%• Ball mills - 6% ÷ 10%• Jaw crusher - 3%-5%

11

Energy consumption vs surface area of a typicalcement grinding

12

Grinding factors

Hardness• Feed material needs to be softer than grinding media• Brittleness coefficient (example)

C3S(4.7)> C3A(2.9)>C2S(2.0)

Ratio of grinding media to charge (by wt.)• Usually grinding media : charge= 3:1

RPM of grinding mill• 75-80 % of critical speed ( Vc= 42.29/√d, d is inner diameter of mill in m) Size ratio • Dia of media: dia of feed = 6:1 (typical grinding)

13

Hardness

14

• Resistance to permanently indenting the surface.• Large hardness means:

--resistance to plastic deformation or cracking incompression.

--better wear properties.

Conversion of hardness factor

15

ASTM E140 - 07 Volume 03.01Standard Hardness Conversion Tables for Metals Relationship Among Brinell Hardness, Vickers Hardness, Rockwell Hardness, Superficial Hardness, KnoopHardness etc.

Various hardness testers

16

Pilot production of LC3 in India

17

• Quantity- 130 Tones• Place - Triranga Cement Industries (Gujarat) • Time- January’2015

Process flow diagramme

18

Pilot production in India

Picture of grinding assemblyWeighing &

batching

Ball milling

Separating through classifier

Storage in silo

Bagging

>200 µ

<200 µ

Weighing

19

Pilot production in India

Ball milling

Composition

• Clinker- 50%• Calcined clay- 31%• Lime stone- 15%• Gypsum- 4%

• Weighing sequence of raw materials1. Clinker2.clay3. Lime stone4. Gypsum

20

• Capacity of ball mill- 5 T/ h• RPM of ball mill- 24• Throughput time(ball mill)- 25min• Feed size - 6-10mm• Total length of the mill

7.725(2.525+5.2)m• Grinding media- Hardened steel ball• Size of grinding media in chamber 1

50-75 mm (4 ton)• Size of grinding media in chamber2

20-30 mm (10 ton)• Inner dia. of mill 1.8 m• Total electric power 397 HP

Pilot production in India

Existing process parameters

Productivity of LC3

• LC3 production /h: 16 T

21

• Color : Reddish grey• Average Blaine value : 495• Size fraction +90µ : 4%

-45µ : 16.52%• LOI : 6.75%• Initial setting time : 110 min• Water consistency : 33.75%• Final setting time : 335 min

Pilot production in India

Product Quality of LC3

Technical Set back

• Limited capacity of pipe lines linked to ball mill, classifier and cement storage silo

• Lower capacity of classifier

• Lack of synchronisation between ball mill and classifier

• Mismatch of grindibility between OPC composition and LC3 blend and hence the productivity

• Restricted flowability of clay due to increased fineness 22

Pilot production in IndiaComparison of grinding energy consumption

0

100

200

300

400

500

Ind.Ave.

ACC(OPC)

ACC(PPC)

T Cem(OPC)

T CemLC3

(20/1)

T CemLC3

(21/1)

T CemLC3

(22/1)

T Cem LC3(24/1)

Ener

gy c

onsu

mpt

ion

(MJ/

t of c

emen

t pro

duce

d)

Indian Industry Average

Legend:Ind. Av. : (Touil et. al)ACC : ACC Ltd. Bhabua grinding unit (Bihar)T Cem : Triranga Cements, RajkotLC3 : Low Carbon Cement

Conclusion

23

• Grindibility of LC3 is higher than that of OPC fromsame clinker leading to higher productivity of LC3.

• Grinding energy consumption of LC3 is lower thanthat of OPC.

• Both limestone and calcined clay are softer than clinker which improve grinding efficiency and productivity.

• Blending process of LC3 needs to be modified in an optimised way.

Thank you

LC3 PROJECT OFFICE

EPFL STI IMX LMC MXG 211Station 12, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

Jérôme Daniel Laffely+41 21 69 [email protected]