WEED MANAGEMENT METHODS AND INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT nextEnd.
Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price
description
Transcript of Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price
![Page 1: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science
William J. Price
Statistical ProgramsCollege of Agricultural and Life Sciences
University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho
![Page 2: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Statistical Estimation Software
• S+
• R
• Statistica, etc.
• Sigma Plot, AXUM, etc.
• SAS
![Page 3: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Normal: yij = (1/2) exp((x-)2/2
• Logistic: yij = 1 / (1 + exp( -dosei - ))
• Modified Logistic: yij = C + (D-C) / (1 + exp( -Bdosei - ))) (e.g. Seefeldt et al. 1995)
• Gompertz: yij = 0 (1 - exp(exp(-(dose))))
yij = 0 exp(-(dose))
• Exponential: yij = 0 [1 - exp(-(dose))]
Common Dose-response Models
• Logistic: yij = 1 / (1 + exp( -dosei - ))
• Modified Logistic: yij = C + (D-C) / (1 + exp( -Bdosei - I))) (e.g. Seefeldt et al. 1995)
![Page 4: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Probit Maximum Likelihood• Data description
• Vernalization study.
• Fixed number of wheat plants• 6 to 10 wheat plants per replication and temperature.• (SAS: plants).
• Five temperatures (doses):• 0, -10, -12, -14, and -16 degrees celcius• (SAS: temp = temperature + 17).
• Number of wheat plants alive after 2 weeks recorded • (SAS: alive2wk).
![Page 5: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Temperature
0
.25
.50
.75
1.00
-16 0
Pro
po
rtio
n A
live
Vernalization Data
![Page 6: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
proc probit data=freeze log optc lackfit inversecl;model alive2wk/plants = temp/distribution=logistic ;predpplot var=temp;
proc probit data=freeze log optc lackfit inversecl;model alive2wk/plants = temp/distribution=logistic ;predpplot var=temp;
• Code:
Probit Maximum Likelihood
• SAS Procedure: PROC PROBIT.
proc probit data=freeze log optc lackfit inversecl;model alive2wk/plants = temp/distribution=logistic ;predpplot var=temp;
proc probit data=freeze log optc lackfit inversecl;model alive2wk/plants = temp/distribution=logistic ;predpplot var=temp;
proc probit data=freeze log optc lackfit inversecl;model alive2wk/plants = temp/distribution=logistic;predpplot var=temp;
proc probit data=freeze log optc lackfit inversecl;model alive2wk/plants = temp/distribution=logistic;predpplot var=temp;
proc probit data=freeze log optc lackfit inversecl;model alive2wk/plants = temp/distribution=logistic ;predpplot var=temp;
proc probit data=freeze log optc lackfit inversecl;model alive2wk/plants = temp/distribution=logistic ;predpplot var=temp;
![Page 7: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Probit Procedure
Model Information
Data Set WORK.FREEZEEvents Variable alive2wkTrials Variable plantsNumber of Observations 20Number of Events 122Number of Trials 195Name of Distribution LogisticLog Likelihood -83.4877251
Number of Observations Read 20Number of Observations Used 20Number of Events 122Number of Trials 195Missing Values 0
Algorithm converged.
Probit Procedure
Model Information
Data Set WORK.FREEZEEvents Variable alive2wkTrials Variable plantsNumber of Observations 20Number of Events 122Number of Trials 195Name of Distribution LogisticLog Likelihood -83.4877251
Number of Observations Read 20Number of Observations Used 20Number of Events 122Number of Trials 195Missing Values 0
Algorithm converged.
Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Statistic Value DF Pr > ChiSq
Pearson Chi-Square 18.7054 17 0.3457L.R. Chi-Square 22.6138 17 0.1623
Response-Covariate Profile
Response Levels 2Number of Covariate Values 20
Type III Analysis of Effects
WaldEffect DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq
Ln(temp) 1 15.2620 <.0001
Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Statistic Value DF Pr > ChiSq
Pearson Chi-Square 18.7054 17 0.3457L.R. Chi-Square 22.6138 17 0.1623
Response-Covariate Profile
Response Levels 2Number of Covariate Values 20
Type III Analysis of Effects
WaldEffect DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq
Ln(temp) 1 15.2620 <.0001
PROC PROBIT Output
![Page 8: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
PROC PROBIT Output (cont)
Analysis of Parameter Estimates
Standard 95% Confidence Chi-Parameter DF Estimate Error Limits Square Pr > ChiSq
Intercept 1 -6.9144 2.0126 -10.8590 -2.9699 11.80 0.0006Ln(temp) 1 4.5094 1.1543 2.2470 6.7717 15.26 <.0001_C_ 1 0.2258 0.0623 0.1037 0.3480
Probability temp 95% Fiducial Limits
0.01 1.67252 0.48881 2.54641 0.02 1.95482 0.66670 2.83256 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.40 4.23519 3.00063 4.96946 0.45 4.43197 3.25697 5.16920 0.50 4.63365 3.52170 5.38443 0.55 4.84451 3.79739 5.62420 0.60 5.06959 4.08622 5.90119 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.99 12.83734 9.46539 30.51920
Analysis of Parameter Estimates
Standard 95% Confidence Chi-Parameter DF Estimate Error Limits Square Pr > ChiSq
Intercept 1 -6.9144 2.0126 -10.8590 -2.9699 11.80 0.0006Ln(temp) 1 4.5094 1.1543 2.2470 6.7717 15.26 <.0001_C_ 1 0.2258 0.0623 0.1037 0.3480
Probability temp 95% Fiducial Limits
0.01 1.67252 0.48881 2.54641 0.02 1.95482 0.66670 2.83256 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.40 4.23519 3.00063 4.96946 0.45 4.43197 3.25697 5.16920 0.50 4.63365 3.52170 5.38443 0.55 4.84451 3.79739 5.62420 0.60 5.06959 4.08622 5.90119 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.99 12.83734 9.46539 30.51920
![Page 9: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PROC PROBIT Output (cont)
Temperature (C)
-16 0
0
.25
.50
.75
1.00
OPTC = 0.23
Pro
po
rtio
n A
live
![Page 10: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Probit Limitations• Proportional Data.• Maximum set to 1.0.• Limited number of response models.
• Probit Advantages• Automatic Goodness of Fit test.• Easily computed percentiles.• Ability to do treatment comparisons.• Graphic output.
PROC PROBIT (cont)
![Page 11: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• Code:
proc nlin data=freeze ; parms I = 8 B = -4.5 C = .12; bounds B<0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));model per2 = mu;output out=pred p=pred;
proc nlin data=freeze ; parms I = 8 B = -4.5 C = .12; bounds B<0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));model per2 = mu;output out=pred p=pred;
Nonlinear Least Squares
• SAS Procedure: PROC NLIN
proc nlin data=freeze ; parms I = 8 B = -4.5 C = .12; bounds B<0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));model per2 = mu;output out=pred p=pred;
proc nlin data=freeze ; parms I = 8 B = -4.5 C = .12; bounds B<0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));model per2 = mu;output out=pred p=pred;
proc nlin data=freeze ; parms I = 8 B = -4.5 C = .12; bounds B<0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));model per2 = mu;output out=pred p=pred;
proc nlin data=freeze ; parms I = 8 B = -4.5 C = .12; bounds B<0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));model per2 = mu;output out=pred p=pred;
![Page 12: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The NLIN ProcedureDependent Variable per2Method: Gauss-Newton
Iterative Phase Sum of Iter I B C Squares
0 4.6000 -4.6000 0.2200 0.3767 1 4.6147 -4.6464 0.2268 0.3765 2 4.6119 -4.6366 0.2264 0.3765 3 4.6125 -4.6388 0.2265 0.3765 4 4.6123 -4.6383 0.2265 0.3765 5 4.6124 -4.6384 0.2265 0.3765
NOTE: Convergence criterion met.
Estimation Summary
Method Gauss-NewtonIterations 5R 3.628E-6PPC(B) 4.559E-6RPC(B) 0.000021Object 2.25E-10Objective 0.37647Observations Read 20Observations Used 20Observations Missing 0
The NLIN ProcedureDependent Variable per2Method: Gauss-Newton
Iterative Phase Sum of Iter I B C Squares
0 4.6000 -4.6000 0.2200 0.3767 1 4.6147 -4.6464 0.2268 0.3765 2 4.6119 -4.6366 0.2264 0.3765 3 4.6125 -4.6388 0.2265 0.3765 4 4.6123 -4.6383 0.2265 0.3765 5 4.6124 -4.6384 0.2265 0.3765
NOTE: Convergence criterion met.
Estimation Summary
Method Gauss-NewtonIterations 5R 3.628E-6PPC(B) 4.559E-6RPC(B) 0.000021Object 2.25E-10Objective 0.37647Observations Read 20Observations Used 20Observations Missing 0
PROC NLIN Output
![Page 13: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Sum of Mean ApproxSource DF Squares Square F Value Pr > F
Model 3 9.6353 3.2118 145.03 <.0001Error 17 0.3765 0.0221Uncorrected Total 20 10.0117
ApproxParameter Estimate Std Error Approximate 95% Confidence Limits
I 4.6124 0.4511 3.6607 5.5640B -4.6384 1.7176 -8.2622 -1.0147C 0.2265 0.0723 0.0739 0.3791
Approximate Correlation Matrix I B C
I 1.0000000 -0.4991207 0.6394756B -0.4991207 1.0000000 -0.5126022C 0.6394756 -0.5126022 1.0000000
Sum of Mean ApproxSource DF Squares Square F Value Pr > F
Model 3 9.6353 3.2118 145.03 <.0001Error 17 0.3765 0.0221Uncorrected Total 20 10.0117
ApproxParameter Estimate Std Error Approximate 95% Confidence Limits
I 4.6124 0.4511 3.6607 5.5640B -4.6384 1.7176 -8.2622 -1.0147C 0.2265 0.0723 0.0739 0.3791
Approximate Correlation Matrix I B C
I 1.0000000 -0.4991207 0.6394756B -0.4991207 1.0000000 -0.5126022C 0.6394756 -0.5126022 1.0000000
PROC NLIN Output (cont)
![Page 14: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Ln (temp)0 1 2 3
Pro
po
rtio
n A
live
PROC NLIN Output (cont)
![Page 15: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• NLIN Limitations• Assumes normally distributed response.• Approximate tests.• Treatment comparisons not automatic.
• NLIN Advantages• Not restricted to proportional data.• Maximum may be any value.• Response models not limited.
PROC NLIN (cont)
![Page 16: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
proc nlmixed data=freeze corr; parms I = 4.5 B = -4.8 C = .228; bounds B<0, I>0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));
model alive2wk ~ binomial(plants, mu);predict plants*mu out=pred1;predict mu out=pred2;
proc nlmixed data=freeze corr; parms I = 4.5 B = -4.8 C = .228; bounds B<0, I>0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));
model alive2wk ~ binomial(plants, mu);predict plants*mu out=pred1;predict mu out=pred2;
• Code:
proc nlmixed data=freeze corr; parms I = 4.5 B = -4.8 C = .228; bounds B<0, I>0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));
model alive2wk ~ binomial(plants, mu);predict plants*mu out=pred1;predict mu out=pred2;
proc nlmixed data=freeze corr; parms I = 4.5 B = -4.8 C = .228; bounds B<0, I>0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));
model alive2wk ~ binomial(plants, mu);predict plants*mu out=pred1;predict mu out=pred2;
proc nlmixed data=freeze corr;parms I = 4.5 B = -4.8 C = .228;bounds B<0, I>0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));
model alive2wk ~ binomial(plants, mu);predict plants*mu out=pred1;
predict mu out=pred2;
proc nlmixed data=freeze corr;parms I = 4.5 B = -4.8 C = .228;bounds B<0, I>0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));
model alive2wk ~ binomial(plants, mu);predict plants*mu out=pred1;
predict mu out=pred2;
proc nlmixed data=freeze corr; parms I = 4.5 B = -4.8 C = .228; bounds B<0, I>0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));
model alive2wk ~ binomial(plants, mu);predict plants*mu out=pred1;
predict mu out=pred2;
proc nlmixed data=freeze corr; parms I = 4.5 B = -4.8 C = .228; bounds B<0, I>0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));
model alive2wk ~ binomial(plants, mu);predict plants*mu out=pred1;
predict mu out=pred2;
proc nlmixed data=freeze corr; parms I = 4.5 B = -4.8 C = .228; bounds B<0, I>0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));
model alive2wk ~ binomial(plants, mu);predict plants*mu out=pred1;
predict mu out=pred2;
proc nlmixed data=freeze corr; parms I = 4.5 B = -4.8 C = .228; bounds B<0, I>0;
mu = C + (1-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltemp-log(I))));
model alive2wk ~ binomial(plants, mu);predict plants*mu out=pred1;
predict mu out=pred2;
Maximum Likelihood
• SAS Procedure: PROC NLMIXED
![Page 17: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Dependent Variable alive2wkDistribution for Dependent Variable BinomialOptimization Technique Dual Quasi-Newton
Dimensions
Observations Used 20Observations Not Used 0Total Observations 20Parameters 3
Iteration History
Iter Calls NegLogLike Diff MaxGrad Slope
1 4 28.3612297 0.034097 1.623059 -27.1026 2 5 28.2115599 0.14967 0.572223 -3.97671 3 10 28.1847135 1.433E-8 0.000016 -2.67E-8
NOTE: GCONV convergence criterion satisfied.
Fit Statistics
-2 Log Likelihood 56.4 AIC (smaller is better) 62.4 AICC (smaller is better) 63.9 BIC (smaller is better) 65.4
Dependent Variable alive2wkDistribution for Dependent Variable BinomialOptimization Technique Dual Quasi-Newton
Dimensions
Observations Used 20Observations Not Used 0Total Observations 20Parameters 3
Iteration History
Iter Calls NegLogLike Diff MaxGrad Slope
1 4 28.3612297 0.034097 1.623059 -27.1026 2 5 28.2115599 0.14967 0.572223 -3.97671 3 10 28.1847135 1.433E-8 0.000016 -2.67E-8
NOTE: GCONV convergence criterion satisfied.
Fit Statistics
-2 Log Likelihood 56.4 AIC (smaller is better) 62.4 AICC (smaller is better) 63.9 BIC (smaller is better) 65.4
PROC NLMIXED Output
![Page 18: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
PROC NLMIXED Output (cont)
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper Gradient
I 4.6337 0.4151 20 11.16 <.0001 0.05 3.7677 5.4996 4.629E-6B -4.5094 1.1543 20 -3.91 0.0009 0.05 -6.9172 -2.1016 -2.62E-6C 0.2258 0.06231 20 3.62 0.0017 0.05 0.09585 0.3558 0.000016
Correlation Matrix of Parameter Estimates
Row Parameter I B C
1 I 1.0000 -0.5276 0.5848 2 B -0.5276 1.0000 -0.3896 3 C 0.5848 -0.3896 1.0000
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper Gradient
I 4.6337 0.4151 20 11.16 <.0001 0.05 3.7677 5.4996 4.629E-6B -4.5094 1.1543 20 -3.91 0.0009 0.05 -6.9172 -2.1016 -2.62E-6C 0.2258 0.06231 20 3.62 0.0017 0.05 0.09585 0.3558 0.000016
Correlation Matrix of Parameter Estimates
Row Parameter I B C
1 I 1.0000 -0.5276 0.5848 2 B -0.5276 1.0000 -0.3896 3 C 0.5848 -0.3896 1.0000
![Page 19: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Ln(temp)0 1 2 3
Nu
mb
er
of
surv
ivin
g p
lan
tsPROC NLMIXED Output (cont)
![Page 20: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Ln(temp)0 1 2 3
Procedure Comparisons
Probit
NLin
NLMixedPro
po
rtio
n A
live
![Page 21: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
• All three procedures can produce similar results.• Binomial or proportional data.• Maximum response of 1.0.
• PROBIT limited in models and response types.
• NLIN and NLMIXED provide nonlinear solutions.
• NLMIXED most flexible for responses and models.
Procedure Comparisons
![Page 22: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
NLMIXED Example: Normal Data
• Binomial - yes/no data.
• Normal - continuous data.
• Poisson - discrete count data.
• User defined - any data.
• NLMIXED probability distributions:
• Example: Seefeldt, et al. 1995
• Wild oat resistance• Treated with fenoxaprop/2,4-D/MCPA (SAS: dose).• Dry weights at 2 weeks (SAS: adj_wt).
![Page 23: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.28
Dry
Wei
gh
t (g
)NLMIXED Example: Normal Data
Biotype C
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000
Dose (kg ai/ha)
![Page 24: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
proc nlmixed data=seefeldt;parms C=.04 D=.2 B=3 I=.1 sig=.021;bounds C>0, D>0, B>0, sig>0;
if dose = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model adj_wt ~ normal(mu, sig**2);predict mu out=fitted;
proc nlmixed data=seefeldt;parms C=.04 D=.2 B=3 I=.1 sig=.021;bounds C>0, D>0, B>0, sig>0;
if dose = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model adj_wt ~ normal(mu, sig**2);predict mu out=fitted;
• Assume dry weight to be normally distributed with mean mu and variance sig2.
• Must model sig explicitly.
NLMIXED Example: Normal Data
![Page 25: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Iteration History
Iter Calls NegLogLike Diff MaxGrad Slope
1 14 -63.769085 17.90341 925.7938 -4745664 2 19 -90.116746 26.34766 3490.083 -1912.68 3 66 -122.58572 4.511E-8 0.040557 -1E-7
NOTE: GCONV convergence criterion satisfied.
Fit Statistics
-2 Log Likelihood -245.2AIC (smaller is better) -235.2AICC (smaller is better) -233.9BIC (smaller is better) -225.1
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Lower Upper C 0.04823 0.01893 51 2.55 0.0137 0.01030 0.08616 D 0.1836 0.00794 51 23.12 <.0001 0.1677 0.1996 B 1.3283 0.4510 51 2.95 0.0047 0.4246 2.2321 I 1.1669 0.3539 51 3.30 0.0017 0.4576 1.8762 sig 0.02937 0.00280 51 10.49 <.0001 0.02376 0.03498
Iteration History
Iter Calls NegLogLike Diff MaxGrad Slope
1 14 -63.769085 17.90341 925.7938 -4745664 2 19 -90.116746 26.34766 3490.083 -1912.68 3 66 -122.58572 4.511E-8 0.040557 -1E-7
NOTE: GCONV convergence criterion satisfied.
Fit Statistics
-2 Log Likelihood -245.2AIC (smaller is better) -235.2AICC (smaller is better) -233.9BIC (smaller is better) -225.1
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Lower Upper C 0.04823 0.01893 51 2.55 0.0137 0.01030 0.08616 D 0.1836 0.00794 51 23.12 <.0001 0.1677 0.1996 B 1.3283 0.4510 51 2.95 0.0047 0.4246 2.2321 I 1.1669 0.3539 51 3.30 0.0017 0.4576 1.8762 sig 0.02937 0.00280 51 10.49 <.0001 0.02376 0.03498
NLMIXED Example: Normal Data
![Page 26: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Dry
Wei
gh
t (g
)
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.28
NLMIXED Example: Normal Data
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000
Dose (kg ai/ha)
Biotype C
![Page 27: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
NLMIXED: Extension of Log-logistic Model
• The log-logistic model can be generalized to estimate any percentile as (Schabenberger, 1999):
yij = C + k(D - C) / (k + exp(B( dosei – I(1-Q) )))
where I(1-Q) is the dose required to reachthe Qth percentile, and k is given by :
k = Q/(1 - Q)
![Page 28: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
NLMIXED: Extension of Log-logistic Model
• Example: • Seefeldt data, biotype C.• Estimate the 90th percentile, e.g. I10
k = Q/(1 - Q) = 0.9/(1.0 - 0.9) = 9.0
Q = 0.9
![Page 29: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
NLMIXED: Extension of Log-logistic Model
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
C 0.04823 0.01893 51 2.55 0.0136 0.05 0.01030 0.08616 D 0.1836 0.007942 51 23.12 <.0001 0.05 0.1677 0.1996 B 1.3284 0.4510 51 2.95 0.0047 0.05 0.4246 2.2321 I 0.2214 0.1098 51 2.02 0.0487 0.05 0.00134 0.4415 sig 0.02605 0.002484 51 10.49 <.0001 0.05 0.02107 0.03103
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
C 0.04823 0.01893 51 2.55 0.0136 0.05 0.01030 0.08616 D 0.1836 0.007942 51 23.12 <.0001 0.05 0.1677 0.1996 B 1.3284 0.4510 51 2.95 0.0047 0.05 0.4246 2.2321 I 0.2214 0.1098 51 2.02 0.0487 0.05 0.00134 0.4415 sig 0.02605 0.002484 51 10.49 <.0001 0.05 0.02107 0.03103
proc nlmixed data=seefeldt;parms C=.04 D=.2 B=3 I=.1 sig=.021;bounds C>0, D>0, B>0, sig>0;k = 9.0;if dose = 0 then mu = d;else mu = C + k*(D-C)/(k + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model adj_wt ~ normal(mu, sig**2);
proc nlmixed data=seefeldt;parms C=.04 D=.2 B=3 I=.1 sig=.021;bounds C>0, D>0, B>0, sig>0;k = 9.0;if dose = 0 then mu = d;else mu = C + k*(D-C)/(k + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model adj_wt ~ normal(mu, sig**2);
![Page 30: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.28
Dry
Wei
gh
t (g
)
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000
Dose (kg ai/ha)
I10I50
NLMIXED: Extension of Log-logistic Model
Biotype C
![Page 31: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
NLMIXED Example: Treatment Structure
• SAS Data Step statements.
• Build full model.
• Estimates pooled or heterogeneous error.
• Estimate and Contrast statements for treatment
comparisons.
• NLMIXED can accommodate treatment structure:
• Example: Seefeldt, et al. 1995
• Wild oat resistance to fenoxaprop (SAS: dose).• Dry weights at 2 weeks (SAS: adj_wt).• Three biotypes ; w, b, and c (SAS: biotype).
![Page 32: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
• Specify a full model with:
• Independent parameters B and I for each
biotype.
• Common parameter values for C, D, and sig.
Wt = C + (D - C) / (1 + exp(B(dosei - I)))
where B and I are dependent on biotype.
NLMIXED Example: Treatment Structure
![Page 33: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
proc nlmixed data=seefeldt;parms C=.02757 D=.1734 Iw=.1188 Ib=.2221 Ic=1.8936
Bw=4.9642 Bb=2.9461 Bc=1.223 sig=.021;
bounds C>0, D>0, Bc>0, Bw>0, Bb>0, sig>0;
if biotype = ’w' then do; I = Iw; B=Bw;
end;else if biotype = 'c' then do;
I = Ic; B=Bc; end;else if biotype = 'b' then do;
I = Ib; B=Bb; end;
if dose = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I)))); model adj_wt ~ normal(mu, sig**2);
contrast 'Iw vs Ic' Iw-Ic;contrast 'Iw vs Ib' Iw-Ib;contrast 'Ib vs Ic' Ib-Ic;predict mu out=fitted;
proc nlmixed data=seefeldt;parms C=.02757 D=.1734 Iw=.1188 Ib=.2221 Ic=1.8936
Bw=4.9642 Bb=2.9461 Bc=1.223 sig=.021;
bounds C>0, D>0, Bc>0, Bw>0, Bb>0, sig>0;
if biotype = ’w' then do; I = Iw; B=Bw;
end;else if biotype = 'c' then do;
I = Ic; B=Bc; end;else if biotype = 'b' then do;
I = Ib; B=Bb; end;
if dose = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I)))); model adj_wt ~ normal(mu, sig**2);
contrast 'Iw vs Ic' Iw-Ic;contrast 'Iw vs Ib' Iw-Ib;contrast 'Ib vs Ic' Ib-Ic;predict mu out=fitted;
proc nlmixed data=seefeldt;parms C=.02757 D=.1734 Iw=.1188 Ib=.2221 Ic=1.8936
Bw=4.9642 Bb=2.9461 Bc=1.223 sig=.021;
bounds C>0, D>0, Bc>0, Bw>0, Bb>0, sig>0;
if biotype = ’w' then do; I = Iw; B=Bw;
end;else if biotype = 'c' then do;
I = Ic; B=Bc; end;else if biotype = 'b' then do;
I = Ib; B=Bb; end;
if dose = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model adj_wt ~ normal(mu, sig**2);
contrast 'Iw vs Ic' Iw-Ic;contrast 'Iw vs Ib' Iw-Ib;contrast 'Ib vs Ic' Ib-Ic;predict mu out=fitted;
proc nlmixed data=seefeldt;parms C=.02757 D=.1734 Iw=.1188 Ib=.2221 Ic=1.8936
Bw=4.9642 Bb=2.9461 Bc=1.223 sig=.021;
bounds C>0, D>0, Bc>0, Bw>0, Bb>0, sig>0;
if biotype = ’w' then do; I = Iw; B=Bw;
end;else if biotype = 'c' then do;
I = Ic; B=Bc; end;else if biotype = 'b' then do;
I = Ib; B=Bb; end;
if dose = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model adj_wt ~ normal(mu, sig**2);
contrast 'Iw vs Ic' Iw-Ic;contrast 'Iw vs Ib' Iw-Ib;contrast 'Ib vs Ic' Ib-Ic;predict mu out=fitted;
proc nlmixed data=seefeldt;parms C=.02757 D=.1734 Iw=.1188 Ib=.2221 Ic=1.8936
Bw=4.9642 Bb=2.9461 Bc=1.223 sig=.021;
bounds C>0, D>0, Bc>0, Bw>0, Bb>0, sig>0;
if biotype = ’w' then do; I = Iw; B=Bw;
end;else if biotype = 'c' then do;
I = Ic; B=Bc; end;else if biotype = 'b' then do;
I = Ib; B=Bb; end;
if dose = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model adj_wt ~ normal(mu, sig**2);
contrast 'Iw vs Ic' Iw-Ic;contrast 'Iw vs Ib' Iw-Ib;contrast 'Ib vs Ic' Ib-Ic;predict mu out=fitted;
proc nlmixed data=seefeldt;parms C=.02757 D=.1734 Iw=.1188 Ib=.2221 Ic=1.8936
Bw=4.9642 Bb=2.9461 Bc=1.223 sig=.021;
bounds C>0, D>0, Bc>0, Bw>0, Bb>0, sig>0;
if biotype = ’w' then do; I = Iw; B=Bw;
end;else if biotype = 'c' then do;
I = Ic; B=Bc; end;else if biotype = 'b' then do;
I = Ib; B=Bb; end;
if dose = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model adj_wt ~ normal(mu, sig**2);
contrast 'Iw vs Ic' Iw-Ic;contrast 'Iw vs Ib' Iw-Ib;contrast 'Ib vs Ic' Ib-Ic;predict mu out=fitted;
NLMIXED Example: Treatment Structure
![Page 34: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
C 0.02757 0.003604 156 7.65 <.0001 0.05 0.02045 0.03469D 0.1734 0.004979 156 34.82 <.0001 0.05 0.1635 0.1832Iw 0.1188 0.01605 156 7.40 <.0001 0.05 0.08710 0.1505Ib 0.2221 0.01863 156 11.92 <.0001 0.05 0.1853 0.2589Ic 1.8937 0.3140 156 6.03 <.0001 0.05 1.2736 2.5139 Bw 4.9642 1.3211 156 3.76 0.0002 0.05 2.3548 7.5737 Bb 2.9461 1.1567 156 2.55 0.0118 0.05 0.6613 5.2309 Bc 1.2230 0.2016 156 6.07 <.0001 0.05 0.8248 1.6213 sig 0.02626 0.001450 156 18.11 <.0001 0.05 0.02339 0.02912
Contrasts
Num Den Label DF DF F Value Pr > F
Iw vs Ic 1 156 32.64 <.0001 Iw vs Ib 1 156 21.25 <.0001 Ib vs Ic 1 156 28.98 <.0001
Bw vs Bc 1 156 8.27 0.0046 Bw vs Bb 1 156 1.63 0.2030 Bb vs Bc 1 156 2.32 0.1300
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
C 0.02757 0.003604 156 7.65 <.0001 0.05 0.02045 0.03469D 0.1734 0.004979 156 34.82 <.0001 0.05 0.1635 0.1832Iw 0.1188 0.01605 156 7.40 <.0001 0.05 0.08710 0.1505Ib 0.2221 0.01863 156 11.92 <.0001 0.05 0.1853 0.2589Ic 1.8937 0.3140 156 6.03 <.0001 0.05 1.2736 2.5139 Bw 4.9642 1.3211 156 3.76 0.0002 0.05 2.3548 7.5737 Bb 2.9461 1.1567 156 2.55 0.0118 0.05 0.6613 5.2309 Bc 1.2230 0.2016 156 6.07 <.0001 0.05 0.8248 1.6213 sig 0.02626 0.001450 156 18.11 <.0001 0.05 0.02339 0.02912
Contrasts
Num Den Label DF DF F Value Pr > F
Iw vs Ic 1 156 32.64 <.0001 Iw vs Ib 1 156 21.25 <.0001 Ib vs Ic 1 156 28.98 <.0001
Bw vs Bc 1 156 8.27 0.0046 Bw vs Bb 1 156 1.63 0.2030 Bb vs Bc 1 156 2.32 0.1300
NLMIXED Example: Treatment Structure
![Page 35: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Biotype
bcw
Pre
dic
ted
wei
gh
t (g
)
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
NLMIXED Example: Treatment Structure
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000
Dose (kg ai/ha)
![Page 36: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
NLMIXED Example: Poisson data
• Data description
• Simulated injury study.
• Harmony sprayed on pea plants.• measured the number of branches/plant.• (SAS: branches).
• Ten doses:• 0 to 0.125 lbs ai/A.• (SAS: trt).
![Page 37: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Nu
mb
er o
f B
ran
ches
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
NLMIXED Example: Poisson data
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000
Harmony Dose (lb ai/A)
Variety C
![Page 38: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
proc nlmixed data=pea; parms D=10 C=70 B=.8254 I=.01; bounds D>0, B>0;
if trt = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltrt-log(I))));
model branches ~ poisson(mu);
predict mu out=pred;
proc nlmixed data=pea; parms D=10 C=70 B=.8254 I=.01; bounds D>0, B>0;
if trt = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltrt-log(I))));
model branches ~ poisson(mu);
predict mu out=pred;
• Assume the number of branches to be distributed as a Poisson variable.
• In the Poisson distribution, mean = variance = mu.
NLMIXED Example: Poisson data
![Page 39: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
C 11.6834 1.0136 38 11.53 <.0001 0.05 9.6315 13.7352 I 0.01075 0.0013 38 8.41 <.0001 0.05 0.0081 0.0133 B 1.9860 0.3246 38 6.12 <.0001 0.05 1.3289 2.6432 D 69.1586 3.3894 38 20.40 <.0001 0.05 62.2972 76.0201
NLMIXED Example: Poisson data
![Page 40: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Nu
mb
er o
f B
ran
ches
NLMIXED Example: Poisson data
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000
Variety C
Harmony Dose (lb ai/A)
![Page 41: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
NLMIXED: Alternative Models
yij = C + (D - C) / (1 + exp(B(dosei - I)))
• Log-logistic Model
yij = (a-c) exp(-bdose) + c
• Exponential Model
Example:
![Page 42: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Exponential Model for Pea Biomass
• A linear pattern of data on a log scale.• Implies an exponential model, e.g.
Biomass = (a-c) exp(-bdose) + c
where a is an intercept term, c is a lower limit and b is a rate parameter.
• The 50th percentile for this model is given by:
I50 = ln(((a/2) - c)/(a - c))/(-b)
![Page 43: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
NLMIXED: Alternative Models
• Example: Pea Data
• Fit log-logistic model to biomass measurements.
proc nlmixed data=pea corr maxiter=2000; parms D=.5966 I=0.01 B=.51 C=.04 sig=.09; bounds D>0, B>0;
if trt = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltrt-log(I))));
model bio ~ normal(mu, sig**2);
proc nlmixed data=pea corr maxiter=2000; parms D=.5966 I=0.01 B=.51 C=.04 sig=.09; bounds D>0, B>0;
if trt = 0 then mu = D;else mu = C + (D-C)/(1 + exp(B*(ltrt-log(I))));
model bio ~ normal(mu, sig**2);
![Page 44: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Bio
ma
ss
(g/p
lan
t)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000
Log-logistic Model for Pea Biomass
Harmony Dose (lb ai/A)
![Page 45: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Log-logistic Model for Pea Biomass
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
D 1.2751 4.3499 38 0.29 0.7710 0.05 -7.5308 10.0810 I 0.02792 0.4771 38 0.06 0.9536 0.05 -0.9379 0.9937 B 0.1261 0.6405 38 0.20 0.8449 0.05 -1.1704 1.4227 C -0.7546 5.9311 38 -0.13 0.8994 0.05 -12.7614 11.2522 sig 0.09240 0.01060 38 8.72 <.0001 0.05 0.07094 0.1139
Correlation Matrix of Parameter Estimates
Row Parameter D I B C sig
1 D 1.0000 0.6108 -0.9903 -0.9568 -0.00074 2 I 0.6108 1.0000 -0.7133 -0.8146 -0.00306 3 B -0.9903 -0.7133 1.0000 0.9873 0.001188 4 C -0.9568 -0.8146 0.9873 1.0000 0.001668 5 sig -0.00074 -0.00306 0.001188 0.001668 1.0000
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
D 1.2751 4.3499 38 0.29 0.7710 0.05 -7.5308 10.0810 I 0.02792 0.4771 38 0.06 0.9536 0.05 -0.9379 0.9937 B 0.1261 0.6405 38 0.20 0.8449 0.05 -1.1704 1.4227 C -0.7546 5.9311 38 -0.13 0.8994 0.05 -12.7614 11.2522 sig 0.09240 0.01060 38 8.72 <.0001 0.05 0.07094 0.1139
Correlation Matrix of Parameter Estimates
Row Parameter D I B C sig
1 D 1.0000 0.6108 -0.9903 -0.9568 -0.00074 2 I 0.6108 1.0000 -0.7133 -0.8146 -0.00306 3 B -0.9903 -0.7133 1.0000 0.9873 0.001188 4 C -0.9568 -0.8146 0.9873 1.0000 0.001668 5 sig -0.00074 -0.00306 0.001188 0.001668 1.0000
![Page 46: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Exponential Model for Pea Biomass
proc nlmixed data=pea corr; parms a=.5217 b=106.5 c = .2026 sig=.09;
mu =(a-c)*exp(-b*trt) + c;
model bio ~ normal(mu, sig**2);predict mu out=pred;
estimate ’I50' log(((a/2)-c)/(a-c))/(-b);
proc nlmixed data=pea corr; parms a=.5217 b=106.5 c = .2026 sig=.09;
mu =(a-c)*exp(-b*trt) + c;
model bio ~ normal(mu, sig**2);predict mu out=pred;
estimate ’I50' log(((a/2)-c)/(a-c))/(-b);
![Page 47: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
a 0.5260 0.03375 38 15.59 <.0001 0.05 0.4577 0.5943 b 106.50 51.3184 38 2.08 0.0448 0.05 2.6113 210.39 c 0.2026 0.03622 38 5.59 <.0001 0.05 0.1293 0.2760 sig 0.09861 0.01131 38 8.72 <.0001 0.05 0.07571 0.1215
Correlation Matrix of Parameter Estimates
Row Parameter a b c sig
1 a 1.0000 0.6473 0.2864 0.000060 2 b 0.6473 1.0000 0.6696 0.000091 3 c 0.2864 0.6696 1.0000 0.000062 4 sig 0.000060 0.000091 0.000062 1.0000
Additional Estimates
StandardLabel Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
I50 0.01576 0.006829 38 2.31 0.0265 0.05 0.001937 0.02958
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
a 0.5260 0.03375 38 15.59 <.0001 0.05 0.4577 0.5943 b 106.50 51.3184 38 2.08 0.0448 0.05 2.6113 210.39 c 0.2026 0.03622 38 5.59 <.0001 0.05 0.1293 0.2760 sig 0.09861 0.01131 38 8.72 <.0001 0.05 0.07571 0.1215
Correlation Matrix of Parameter Estimates
Row Parameter a b c sig
1 a 1.0000 0.6473 0.2864 0.000060 2 b 0.6473 1.0000 0.6696 0.000091 3 c 0.2864 0.6696 1.0000 0.000062 4 sig 0.000060 0.000091 0.000062 1.0000
Additional Estimates
StandardLabel Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
I50 0.01576 0.006829 38 2.31 0.0265 0.05 0.001937 0.02958
Exponential Model for Pea Biomass
![Page 48: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Exponential Model for Pea Biomass
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.0001 0.0010 0.0100 0.1000
Bio
ma
ss
(g/p
lan
t)
Harmony Dose (lb ai/A)
![Page 49: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Nonlinear Mixed Models
• Random effects may also be modeled.• Locations.• Years.• Experiments/replications.• See for example Nielson, et al 2004.
• Components estimated.• Within effects - Variances.• Between effects - Covariances.
• Requires caution.• Parsimony.• Estimation problems.
![Page 50: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
• Example: Fungus Gnat Data.
• Evaluate efficacy of rapeseed meal (SAS: dose).
• Three experiments.
• Separate runs for each block (SAS: block).
• Measured egg hatch (SAS: mort).
• High variability in natural mortality from
run to run.
Nonlinear Mixed Models
![Page 51: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
proc nlmixed maxiter=1000 data=gnat2; parms I=.245 B=-3.58 c=.295; bounds B<0, C>0, I>0;
if dose = 0 then mu = c;else mu = c + (1-c)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model mort ~ binomial(20,mu);
predict mu*20 out=pred1;run;
proc nlmixed maxiter=1000 data=gnat2; parms I=.245 B=-3.58 c=.295; bounds B<0, C>0, I>0;
if dose = 0 then mu = c;else mu = c + (1-c)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model mort ~ binomial(20,mu);
predict mu*20 out=pred1;run;
Nonlinear Mixed Models
• Fixed effects model:
![Page 52: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Fit Statistics
-2 Log Likelihood 1593.6 AIC (smaller is better) 1599.6 AICC (smaller is better) 1599.8 BIC (smaller is better) 1609.5
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
I 0.2387 0.01117 200 21.38 <.0001 0.05 0.2167 0.2607B -1.6369 0.1708 200 -9.59 <.0001 0.05 -1.9736 -1.3002c 0.2567 0.01610 200 15.94 <.0001 0.05 0.2249 0.2884
Fit Statistics
-2 Log Likelihood 1593.6 AIC (smaller is better) 1599.6 AICC (smaller is better) 1599.8 BIC (smaller is better) 1609.5
Parameter Estimates
StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
I 0.2387 0.01117 200 21.38 <.0001 0.05 0.2167 0.2607B -1.6369 0.1708 200 -9.59 <.0001 0.05 -1.9736 -1.3002c 0.2567 0.01610 200 15.94 <.0001 0.05 0.2249 0.2884
Nonlinear Mixed Models
• Fixed effects model:
![Page 53: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Mo
rta l
ity
0
10
20
Rapeseed Meal (mg)0.01 0.10
Fixed Effects Model
![Page 54: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Nonlinear Mixed Models
• Random effects model:• Let natural mortality parameter, C, be random.
proc nlmixed maxiter=1000 data=gnat2; parms I=.2582 B=-1.78 C=.2866 sigC=.17; bounds B<0, c>0, I>0;
Ce = C + e;
if dose = 0 then mu = Ce;else mu = Ce + (1-Ce)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model mort ~ binomial(20,mu);
random e~normal(0, sigC**2) subject=block;
proc nlmixed maxiter=1000 data=gnat2; parms I=.2582 B=-1.78 C=.2866 sigC=.17; bounds B<0, c>0, I>0;
Ce = C + e;
if dose = 0 then mu = Ce;else mu = Ce + (1-Ce)/(1 + exp(B*(ldose-log(I))));model mort ~ binomial(20,mu);
random e~normal(0, sigC**2) subject=block;
![Page 55: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Fit Statistics -2 Log Likelihood 1182.9 AIC (smaller is better) 1190.9 AICC (smaller is better) 1191.1 BIC (smaller is better) 1192.1
Parameter Estimates StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
I 0.2580 0.009979 9 25.85 <.0001 0.05 0.2354 0.2805B -1.7834 0.1668 9 -10.69 <.0001 0.05 -2.1606 -1.4062C 0.2861 0.06377 9 4.49 0.0015 0.05 0.1419 0.4304sigC 0.1981 0.04511 9 4.39 0.0017 0.05 0.09609 0.3002
Fit Statistics -2 Log Likelihood 1182.9 AIC (smaller is better) 1190.9 AICC (smaller is better) 1191.1 BIC (smaller is better) 1192.1
Parameter Estimates StandardParm Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Alpha Lower Upper
I 0.2580 0.009979 9 25.85 <.0001 0.05 0.2354 0.2805B -1.7834 0.1668 9 -10.69 <.0001 0.05 -2.1606 -1.4062C 0.2861 0.06377 9 4.49 0.0015 0.05 0.1419 0.4304sigC 0.1981 0.04511 9 4.39 0.0017 0.05 0.09609 0.3002
Nonlinear Mixed Models
• Random effects model
![Page 56: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Mo
rta l
ity
0
10
20
Rapeseed Meal (mg)0.01 0.10
Random Effects Model
![Page 57: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Mo
rta l
ity
0
10
20
Rapeseed Meal (mg)0.01 0.10
Random and Fixed Effects Models
Fixed Effects
Random Effects
![Page 58: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
• In general, random effects models:• Are useful with identifiable sources of variability.• Increase overall variability.• Improve measures of fit.
• However:• They may not be parsimonious.• They can be difficult to fit.
Nonlinear Mixed Models
![Page 59: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
References
• Nielson, O. K., C. Ritz, J. C. Streibig. 2004. Nonlinear mixed-model regression to analyze herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technonlogy, 18: 30-37.
• Ratkowsky, D. A. 1989. Handbook of Nonlinear Regression Models. Marcel Dekker, Inc. 241 pp.
• SAS Inst. Inc. 2004. SAS OnlineDoc, Version 9, Cary, NC.
• Schabenberger,O., B. E. Tharp, J. J. Kells, and D. Penner. 1999. Statistical tests for hormesis and effective dosages in herbicide dose response. Agron. J. 91: 713-721.
• Seefeldt, S.S., J. E. Jensen, and P. Fuerst. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218-227.
![Page 60: Practical Application of Dose-response Functions in Weed Science William J. Price](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56814674550346895db398ac/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Questions / Commentshttp://www.uidaho.edu/ag/statprog