Supplemental Reportto the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

1990-1991

Green Bean breeding and evaluation.

Project Leaders: J.R. Baggett, HorticultureD.M. Barrett, Food Science and Technology

Project Status: Terminated June 30, 1991

Project Funding: 39,000 breeding25,000 breeding supplementary technical support14,355 processing

Processing funds were used for student labor and supplies required for processingsamples of experimental beans, laboratory analysis and panel evaluations.

Objectives:industry with:

sizes and

Lake type,

Breed bush green beans for the Western Oregon processing

improved potential for high yields at favorable sievedependability,

improved straightness, texture, and other quality factors,emphasis on easy picking and small pod strains of Blue

resistance to white mold and root rot.

Ev n Pr c sin f Ex riment I re n B 1 9 -19 1

During the summer of 1990, 15 experimental OSU green bean lines (including twosmall sieve lines), two commercial small sieve varieties, and Oregon 91G wereprocessed for evaluation (Planting l). Seven of the OSU lines and 91G weresubjected to further evaluation. These lines were processed approximately every twodays for three plantings (Plantings II, IV, and V). Canned beans were produced fromPlantings I, II, and V. Frozen samples were produced from Plantings I and IV.

The sensory analysis was performed by a volunteer industry panel. Whole beansamples were displayed of sieves 3-6 and samples of cut 5 sieve beans werepresented for tasting. Quality factors rated by the panel were: appearance, color,flavor, texture, and overall quality. A 1 to 9 point scale was used with 1 being"unacceptable" and 9 being "superior." Scores were averaged and the standarddeviations calculated for each sample and attribute. The values are shown in Tables 1-4 and depicted in Figures 1-20. Table 5 shows the % seed and fiber for the sevenOSU lines and 91G in the multiharvest trial.

Thirteen ballots were completed for the canned product and fifteen for the frozen.Unfortunately, this number of panelists is too small to show statistically significantdifferences between almost any of the samples. The fact that many of theexperimental beans are closely related makes discrimination between samplesdifficult under the best circumstances. A larger number of panelists is clearly neededto make the sensory analysis useful.

Single Harvest

The lines and varieties included in the single harvest trial were:

Oregon 91G OSU 5404OSU 5163 OSU 5405 and small sieve lines:OSU 5256 OSU 5408 B7184OSU 5384 OSU 5416 B7206OSU 5386 OSU 5418 BBL 76-110OSU 5402 OSU 5420 S&G 6192OSU 5403 OSU 5421

Canned: High scoring lines in appearance were OSU 5408 and BBL 76-110. The lowstandard deviation for the 5408 appearance score indicates more agreement amongpanelists about their sample than most others. High standard deviations for severalattributes for BBL 76-110 indicate some disagreement about this sample. However,76-110 generally scored the highest of the small sieve lines. OSU 5386 scoredrelatively high in color, texture, and overall quality.

Frozen: OSU 5256 scored the highest of the standard size beans in all categories.OSU 5386 had the lowest scores in all attributes. In flavor, texture, and overall quality,the scores for 5386 were even statistically less than the highest scoring lines. Of thesmall sieve lines, BBL 76-110 had the highest appearance score, but had flavor,texture, and overall quality scores that were very low, statistically less than all the othersmall sieve lines. 87184 had the highest color, flavor, and overall quality scores of allthe frozen beans in the single harvest trial, standard and small sieve lines.

Multi-Harvest

The following beans were included in the multiharvest trial:

Oregon 91G OSU 5403OSU 5163 OSU 5405OSU 5256 OSU 5416OSU 5402 OSU 5421

Canned: Oregon 91G was given the lowest appearance, color, texture, and overallquality scores. OSU 5163 and 5256 had high appearance and color scores but low tomoderate flavor and overall quality scores. OSU 5402 had highest appearance, flavorand overall quality scores and scored high in color. OSU 5421 had the highest colorand texture scores and scored high in appearance and overall quality. OSU 5405 hadthe lowest color and overall quality scores.

Frozen: Oregon 91G scored relatively better as a frozen bean than as a canned bean;it was neither high nor low in any attribute. OSU 5402 scored highest in all categories.In appearance, color, and overall quality the scores for OSU 5402 were statisticallydifferent than some of the lowest scoring samples. OSU 5416 had the lowest scores inappearance, color, flavor, and overall quality and a very low score in texture.

Summary

Highest Scoring Lines

OSU 5408, BBL 76-110OSU 5402, OSU 5421B7184, OSU 5256OSU 5402

Process/Trial

canned, single harvestcanned, multi-harvestfrozen, single harvestfrozen, multi-harvest

The two most important conclusions from this year's work are:

OSU 5402 was the only line to score at the top for both canned andfrozen products.

More panelists are needed to obtain statistically significant results.

Lowest Scoring Lines

OSU 5420, B7206Oregon 91GOSU 5386, BBL 76-110OSU 5416

Table 1. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel, single harvest.Data for days to harvest, % 1-4 sieve, average and standard deviation(in parenthesis) for appearance, color, flavor, texture and overall quality.Planting date: April 20, 1990.

Line Days toharvest

°A) 1-4sieve

Appearance Color Flavor Texture OverallQuality

91G 84 62 4.9 (1.2) 5.4 (1.2) 5.4 (1.0) 5.0 (1.6) 5.2 (1.3)5163 84 67 5.4 (1.0) 5.4 (1.3) 4.8 (1.5) 5.1 (1.5) 5.2 (1.2)5256 84 81 5.2 (1.3) 5.3 (1.4) 5.3 (1.0) 5.1 (1.1) 5.1 (0.9)5384 81 60 5.2 (1.3) 5.5 (1.1) 5.2 (1.2) 4.8 (1.4) 5.1 (1.0)5386 83 58 4.9 (1.0) 5.6 (1.4) 5.2 (1.2) 5.4 (1.0) 5.5 (1.1)5402 87 64 4.9 (1.3) 5.5 (1.2) 5.3 (0.8) 5.1 (1.2) 5.1 (1.0)5403 87 69 5.5 (1.1) 5.4 (1.2) 4.9 (1.3) 4.9 (1.4) 5.4 (1.0)5404 85 67 4.9 (0.9) 5.6 (1.0) 5.2 (0.9) 4.9 (1.1) 5.2 (0.8)5405 84 59 5.1 (1.0) 5.3 (1.2) 5.2 (1.0) 5.1 (1.0) 5.2 (1.0)5408 84 56 5.8 (0.7) 5.5 (1.0) 5.3 (0.9) 5.4 (0.7) 5.4 (0.8)5416 87 67 4.9 (1.0) 5.2 (1.1) 5.0 (1.2) 5.1 (1.1) 5.1 (1.2)5418 87 78 5.1 (1.1) 5.5 (1.4) 5.2 (1.1) 4.9 (1.2) 5.2 (1.1)5420 85 70 4.6 (1.3) 5.3 (1.4) 4.9 (1.6) 4.2 (1.9) 4.7 (1.5)5421 85 68 4.9 (0.9) 5.6 (1.5) 5.5 (1.2) 4.6 (1.8) 4.9 (1.1)

Small sieveB7184 87 66 5.3 (1.2) 5.7 (1.0) 4.9 (1.2) 5.0 (1.2) 5.4 (1.1)B7206 82 91 4.9 (1.5) 5.2 (1.5) 4.5 (1.7) 4.4 (1.2) 4.8 (1.3)

BBL 76-110 83 97 6.1 (1.6) 5.9 (1.3) 4.8 (2.0) 5.1 (2.1) 5.7 (1.7)S & G 6192 85 96 5.4 (1.5) 5.2 (1.6) 4.7 (1.8) 4.9 (1.7) 5.1 (1.4)

Table 2. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel, single harvest. Datafor days to harvest, % 1-4 sieve, average and standard deviation (inparenthesis) for appearance, color, flavor, texture and overall quality.Planting date: April 20, 1990.

Line Days toharvest

% 1-4sieve

Appearance Color Flavor Texture OverallQuality

91G 84 62 4.4 (1.1) 4.6 (1.3) 4.8 (1.4) 4.8 (1.4) 4.5 (1.3)5163 84 67 4.9 (1.2) 4.7 (1.3) 4.6 (1.3) 4.9 (1.5) 4.9 (1.2)5256 84 81 5.2 (1.1) 5.3 (1.6) 5.0 (1.3) 5.3 (1.6) 5.4 (1.1)5384 81 60 4.7 (1.1) 4.9 (1.3) 4.7 (1.2) 4.8 (1.3) 4.8 (0.9)5386 83 58 4.2 (1.3) 4.1 (1.7) 3.5 (1.4) 3.2 (1.5) 3.6 (1.3)5402 87 64 4.9 (1.3) 4.9 (1.3) 4.5 (1.4) 4.6 (1.5) 4.9 (1.3)5403 87 69 4.8 (1.3) 4.9 (1.5) 4.5 (1.5) 4.9 (1.3) 4.8 (1.5)5404 85 67 4.8 (1.0) 4.6 (1.5) 4.5 (1.1) 5.2 (1.3) 4.6 (1.2)5405 84 59 4.9 (1.2) 5.1 (1.4) 4.9 (1.4) 5.1 (1.4) 5.0 (1.3)5408 84 56 4.3 (1.1) 4.6 (1.3) 4.7 (1.6) 5.1 (1.5) 4.6 (1.1)5416 87 67 4.8 (1.3) 5.1 (1.3) 4.3 (1.5) 4.5 (1.4) 4.6 (1.4)541 8 87 78 4.2 (0.9) 4.4 (1.7) 4.0 (1.5) 4.6 (1.4) 4.1 (1.2)5420 85 70 4.7 (1.1) 4.6 (1.3) 4.3 (1.4) 4.6 (1.4) 4.4 (1.1)5421 85 68 4.6 (1.1) 4.5 (1.3) 4.5 (1.1) 4.9 (1.2) 4.6 (1.1)

Small sieveB7184 87 66 5.5 (1.2) 5.8 (1.3) 5.1 (1.5) 5.1 (1.4) 5.4 (1.5)B7206 82 91 5.1 (1.3) 5.2 (1.3) 4.7 (1.6) 4.8 (1.1) 5.1 (1.1)

BBL 76-110 83 97 5.8 (1.4) 4.7 (1.4) 3.2 (1.5) 2.3 (1.3) 3.9 (1.3)S & G 6192 85 96 5.4 (1.1) 5.0 (1.2) 4.9 (1.7) 5.1 (1.5) 5.1 (1.2)

Table 3. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel, multi-harvest. Data forplanting date, harvest date, % 1-4 sieve, days planted, average and standarddeviation (in parenthesis) for appearance, color, flavor, texture and overall quality.

Line Planting Harvest % 1-4 Days Appearance Color Flavor Texture Overalldate date sieve Quality

91 G 3-May 18-Jul 48 75 4.1 (1.0) 5.1 (1.2) 5.0 (1.3) 4.8 (1.1) 4.8 (1.1)20-Jul 35 77 4.5 (0.7) 5.3 (1.0) 4.7 (1.5) 4.3 (1.3) 4.8 (1.4)

15-Jun 10-Aug 55 56 4.5 (1.0) 5.7 (1.0) 4.7 (1.4) 5.0 (1.0) 5.1 (0.9)13-Aug 35 59 4.6 (1.1) 5.1 (1.2) 5.1 (1.1) 4.4 (0.9) 4.9 (0.9)15-Aug 43 61 4.8 (1.0) 5.0 (1.3) 5.0 (1.0) 5.0 (1.0) 5.0 (1.0)

5163 3-May 18-Jul 66 75 5.1 (0.8) 5.4 (1.2) 5.0 (1.2) 4.7 (1.0) 4.9 (1.1)20-Jul 57 77 5.1 (1.1) 5.5 (1.0) 5.1 (1.0) 4.5 (1.3) 5.1 (1.1)

15-Jun 10-Aug 65 56 5.8 (0.9) 5.8 (1.2) 5.2 (1.1) 5.2 (1.1) 5.6 (1.0)13-Aug 49 59 5.0 (1.3) 5.1 (1.3) 4.6 (1.3) 4.9 (1.3) 5.1 (1.1)15-Aug 45 61 4.9 (1.2) 5.1 (1.1) 4.7 (1.3) 4.5 (1.2) 4.9 (1.1)

5256 3-May 18-Jul 66 75 5.0 (1.0) 5.7 (0.9) 4.7 (1.3) 4.4 (1.4) 4.9 (1.2)20-Jul 63 77 5.9 (1.1) 5.8 (0.9) 4.9 (1.4) 5.0 (1.1) 5.6 (0.9)

15-Jun 10-Aug 82 56 5.6 (0.7) 5.9 (1.0) 5.0 (1.0) 5.2 (0.9) 5.6 (0.9)13-Aug 70 59 5.1 (1.1) 5.5 (0.8) 4.7 (1.3) 4.7 (1.1) 4.8 (1.2)15-Aug 72 61 5.5 (0.8) 5.5 (1.1) 4.9 (1.2) 5.1 (1.1) 5.3 (1.0)

5402 3-May 19-Jul 65 76 5.3 (1.1) 5.7 (1.1) 5.1 (1.1) 5.1 (0.9) 5.4 (1.0)21-Jul 59 78 5.0 (1.0) 5.5 (1.2) 5.1 (0.9) 4.7 (0.9) 5.1 (0.7)

15-Jun 13-Aug 58 59 5.7 (1.2) 5.6 (0.8) 5.5 (0.7) 5.3 (0.6) 5.7 (0.6)15-Aug 50 61 6.2 (1.0) 5.9 (1.1) 5.4 (0.8) 5.4 (0.7) 5.9 (0.9)

Table 3. Continued

Line Planting Harvestdate date

% 1-4sieve

Days Appearance Color Flavor Texture OverallQuality

5403 3-May 19-Jul 67 76 5.3 (1.2) 5.3 (1.3) 5.0 (1.0) 5.0 (0.8) 5.2 (0.9)21-Jul 56 78 5.6 (1.0) 5.5 (0.8) 4.8 (1.1) 4.9 (1.0) 5.3 (0.9)

15-Jun 13-Aug 59 59 5.4 (0.9) 5.5 (1.3) 4.9 (1.2) 5.1 (0.9) 5.4 (1.0)15-Aug 53 61 5.0 (1.2) 5.5 (1.0) 5.1 (1.1) 4.9 (0.8) 5.4 (1.0)

5405 3-May 18-Jul 52 75 4.8 (1.2) 5.2 (1.3) 5.1 (1.0) 5.0 (1.1) 5.1 (1.2)20-Jul 43 77 4.8 (1.0) 5.3 (1.1) 5.3 (1.0) 4.7 (1.1) 4.9 (0.9)

15-Jun 10-Aug 53 56 5.0 (1.3) 5.5 (0.9) 5.3 (1.0) 5.3 (0.8) 5.3 (0.8)13-Aug 44 59 4.8 (1.3) 5.0 (1.4) 5.1 (1.3) 5.1 (1.0) 5.0 (1.0)15-Aug 33 61 4.9 (1.0) 5.3 (1.1) 5.0 (1.0) 4.7 (0.9) 4.8 (0.9)

5416 3-May 19-Jul 60 76 4.7 (0.9) 5.3 (1.0) 5.1 (1.1) 4.8 (1.1) 5.0 (1.0)21-Jul 58 78 4.8 (1.0) 5.3 (1.2) 4.7 (1.3) 4.7 (1.0) 4.9 (1.1)

15-Jun 10-Aug 67 56 5.2 (0.9) 5.7 (1.0) 5.2 (1.0) 5.0 (0.8) 5.4 (0.9)13-Aug 60 59 5.4 (1.1) 5.7 (0.9) 5.1 (0.9) 5.0 (1.0) 5.5 (1.0)15-Aug 59 61 4.8 (1.0) 5.1 (1.2) 4.7 (1.4) 4.6 (1.3) 4.9 (1.4)

5421 3-May 18-Jul 54 75 5.8 (0.9) 6.1 (1.1) 5.4 (1.2) 5.3 (1.0) 5.8 (0.9)20-Jul 48 77 5.6 (1.1) 5.9 (1.0) 5.4 (1.5) 5.5 (0.9) 5.7 (0.9)

15-Jun 13-Aug 56 59 5.3 (0.7) 5.7 (1.1) 5.1 (1.2) 5.2 (1.0) 5.4 (0.9)15-Aug 53 61 5.2 (1.2) 5.5 (1.1) 4.9 (1.1) 4.8 (1.0) 5.2 (1.1)

Table 4. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel, multi-harvest. Datafor harvest date, % 1-4 sieve, days planted, average and standard deviation(in parenthesis) for appearance, color, flavor, texture and overall quality.

Line

Planting date: June 4, 1990.

Harvest % 1-4 Days Appearancedate sieve

Color Flavor Texture OverallQuality

91 G 2-Aug 70 59 4.8 (1.0) 4.9 (0.9) 4.8 (1.7) 4.8 (1.6) 5.0 (1.2)4-Aug 38 61 5.0 (1.1) 5.1 (1.3) 4.9 (1.3) 5.1 (1.1) 5.0 (1.1)6-Aug 38 63 5.1 (0.9) 5.3 (1.2) 5.2 (1.3) 5.1 (1.2) 5.2 (1.1)

5163 2-Aug 75 59 5.3 (1.3) 5.2 (1.0) 5.1 (0.9) 5.2 (1.1) 5.3 (1.1)4-Aug 58 61 5.6 (1.2) 5.2 (1.2) 4.8 (1.4) 4.8 (1.4) 4.9 (1.2)6-Aug 56 63 5.5 (1.4) 5.3 (1.3) 4.5 (1.0) 4.7 (1.1) 4.9 (1.2)

5256 3-Aug 76 60 5.2 (1.1) 5.1 (1.3) 4.9 (1.2) 4.9 (1.0) 5.2 (1.1)6-Aug 58 63 5.2 (1.0) 5.3 (1.1) 4.8 (1.2) 4.7 (0.9) 5.1 (1.0)8-Aug 47 65 5.2 (1.0) 5.0 (1.0) 4.5 (1.0) 4.3 (1.1) 4.9 (0.8)

5402 4-Aug 75 61 5.4 (0.8) 5.4 (1.0) 5.0 (1.3) 5.2 (1.1) 5.3 (1.1)6-Aug 63 63 6.2 (0.9) 5.9 (1.1) 5.2 (1.2) 5.2 (1.3) 5.8 (1.1)8-Aug 47 65 5.4 (1.2) 5.4 (1.1) 4.7 (1.3) 4.9 (1.1) 5.3 (1.3)

5403 4-Aug 68 61 5.7 (1.3) 5.5 (1.2) 5.0 (1.0) 5.2 (1.0) 5.5 (1.0)6-Aug 55 63 4.9 (1.1) 5.2 (1.3) 4.9 (1.2) 4.8 (1.1) 5.0 (1.1)8-Aug 41 65 4.8 (1.3) 4.8 (1.1) 4.7 (1.3) 4.6 (1.1) 4.7 (1.1)

5405 2-Aug 76 59 5.2 (1.1) 5.3 (1.0) 4.6 (1.1) 4.8 (1.1) 4.9 (1.0)4-Aug 57 61 4.6 (1.0) 4.9 (1.0) 4.9 (1.0) 4.6 (1.1) 4.7 (0.9)6-Aug 51 63 4.6 (1.1) 4.9 (1.1) 4.9 (1.1) 4.6 (1.0) 4.8 (1.0)

Table 4. Continued

Line Harvest % 1-4 Days Appearance Color Flavor Texture Overalldate sieve Quality

5416 3-Aug 71 60 5.1 (1.2) 5.2 (1.1) 4.7 (1.1) 5.0 (1.0) 5.2 (1.3)6-Aug 49 63 4.5 (1.1) 4.7 (1.1) 4.4 (1.5) 4.4 (1.6) 4.4 (1.4)8-Aug 47 65 4.6 (1.3) 4.5 (1.1) 4.3 (1.3) 4.4 (1.5) 4.4 (1.2)

5421 3-Aug 69 60 5.2 (1.1) 5.2 (1.0) 5.1 (1.2) 5.2 (1.2) 5.1 (1.0)6-Aug 46 63 4.5 (1.2) 5.1 (1.3) 4.9 (1.3) 4.9 (1.1) 4.9 (1.2)8-Aug 41 65 4.8 (1.0) 4.6 (0.8) 4.9 (1.4) 4.9 (1.2) 4.8 (1.0)

Table 5. 1990-91 Green Bean Seed and Fiber Analysis

Sample Line Harvest Date % 1-4 Sieve Size °A. Seed % Fiber

91G 8/13 35 6 8.9 0.0235163 8/15 45 6 11.8 0.0225256 8/15 72 6 10.4 0.0175402 8/15 50 6 8 0.0175403 8/15 53 6 8.7 0.0255405 8/15 33 6 9.4 0.0275416 8/13 60 6 9.5 0.0275421 8/15 53 6 7.1 0.014

9 8 -

7 -

6 -

5 4 -

3 1

v4ss

kss

o o

1;5

vs*

ircs

,

smal

l sie

ve li

nes

Fig

ure

1. 1

990-

91 C

anne

d G

reen

Bea

ns -

Indu

stry

Pan

el,

Sin

gle

Har

vest

, Mea

n A

ppea

ranc

e S

core

s

Mea

n C

olor

Sco

re

C6 40

44

Vs/

:;::::

:::::-

::::

:::::4

::::::

::::v

::...

..xx:

::,-.

.-.::

:-..

ci47

.7-:

:z.

,1i$

A.

::::::

.....-

4::.<

4.:::

:,..v

.:14

::::::

:::*:

::::::

::?:::

:::&

':: :.

.ill

igiti

. iti:

,:?..

CO

CS4

C>

1104

C-:

.:.,:.

..:::.

:-.-

...:..

.::,::

::::::

:.::::

:-.::

:.,:.,

p-...

..,:

::::::

::%.*

:::::s

iwk,

,:-.-

:::-:

.:-.::

,:s-:

-..::

:.,:-

y-0.

---:

-.-.

-:-

0)(1

4N

._

14C

'14

i4

I0)

,.o

. .:::

,:...

. . y

o*::.

..,:?

::: .:

::: :

.;3

liat:t

eer*

:::*:

A) = CD

Figure 3. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Single Harvest, Mean Flavor Scores

Mea

n T

extu

re S

core

:4:,:

::,;::

:.:-

'

xv:,.

..

'

..

:e*A

W-V

§O§:

ft ......

.1

':.'"

Mea

n O

vera

ll Q

ualit

y S

core

Mea

n A

ppea

ranc

e S

core

.1u

010)

I.

.0

43.:

il::::

)44:

::...;

:::g:

::4*-

......

li1.

:

* ch.4

13: ,

'S:::

:.§.>

:t.;:;

:;::;:

;:;:;:

;:;:K

t::::i

*::;:

;::::!

::::::

::::::

::::;:

W:::

::::g

:-,:,

,X::.

,.,x,

x4x,

,xxx

x,xk

+:::

?::::

y::"

>.::

::::::

::::::

::::::

:x:x

-,x

:.,c;

:+x.

x.;*

xx:::

::::::

:::4$

yy:tx

x;:y

xx:-

xx:::

÷::P

.,"

1 ...:::

:::,,.

::::::

::::::

::::::

::::::

::::..

::::-

,::+

:::::4

:+:::

::::::

::::::

:::,;:

::::

1

s,.

..

c$34

Ii-k

.:?:::

?.:::

.g1.

::.:::

1:11

:1*I

II ili

a:::

1I

:K:::

:::,..

.,, .

....,

..f.i:

::.

:::,?

::::::

:,*:::

.:,:x

'sx.

:m

tkix

x.*-

<'-:

::::::

:. .:

,..:

:::::,

:,::,.

.-:*

.w:,:

t.,...

ky:::

,1,-

;:e.:*

*.k.

..:.x

:.::m

ks::.

.1:..

..k.y

tk.-

V4:

.*...

..>:::

::::,,

,,,:

::::::

::::::

:::.

::::::

:::g*

:::...

.

CO

''

.6+

- ,?

,

I:::

::;.;:

::>:::

k::::

:;::,,

::,:::

:::,:,

:,k:::

A:::

-v,"

%::'

:-,:;

?:::4

::x:x

t.;::*

,x<

*::::

::::::

:.:.,'

,:::::

::.::,

4:,4

.-s'

',kg_

&:"

:,1'

, ..

c).

11,4

.,...

....

.....

.1

....y

.:

o 4.)

I-0

fhis

0

2

Figure 7. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel,Single Harvest, Mean Color Scores

small sieve lines

,_a)

Cl) 6

5Cu

LL.

C 4cua)2 3

Figure 8. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel,Single Harvest, Mean Flavor Scores

Figure 9. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel,Single Harvest, Mean Texture Scores

Figure 10. 1990-91 F

rozen Green B

eans - Industry Panel,

Single H

arvest, Mean O

verall Quality S

cores

-1A-i 91GA-- 51630 525671\-- 54020 540311I 54050 5416

5421

56 57 58 59 60 61 75 76 77 78 DaysJune 15 Planting May 3 Planting

Figure 11. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Appearance Score

456 57 58 59 60 61 75 76 77 78 Days

Figure 12. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Color Score

NAN 91GA 5163{=1 5256

54020 5403111 54050 5416

AI 5421

7

5-

June 15 Planting May 3 Planting

4

N

illiti/NP'NE

at.°a ."%4

I6 57 58 59 60 61 "i5 5 76 77 78

June 15 Planting May 3 Planting

Figure 13. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Flavor Score.

9It 91G5163

0 52565402

CI 5403I 54050 5416

5421

Days

7

6 -

5 -

7

6

5

4 I

56 57 58 59 60 61 75 76 77 78 Days

Figure 14. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Texture Score

91 GA-- 51630-- 5256

A 5402--0 5403NH 5405

0 5416Ill- 5421

June 15 Planting May 3 Planting

7

4-111011"--Vastussoasat

"1461.° 91 G111-- 51630-- 5256

540254035405

0-- 54164)-- 5421

456 57 59 60 61 7558 76 77 78 Days

June 15 Planting May 3 Planting

Figure 15. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Overall Quality Score.

7 -

4

Figure 16. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Appearance Score

58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66

Days afterJune 4

planting

-4- 91GA--- 51630 5256

54020 540311 54050 54160 5421

7

58 59 60 61 62 63 64

Figure 17. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Color Score

65 66

Days afterJune 4planting

91G5163

0 52565402

0 540310- 5405

0 54160- 5421

112o 6-

03

2 5

4

sevito 91G--Ag 5163

A.,a)

--i\---52565402

oo

8

5403

CD--i- 5405

> 0-5416ii:

coat

cas

5

0--- 5421

2

4

A

58 59 60 61 62 64 65 66

Figure 18. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel, June 4

ulti-Harvest, Mean Flavor Score

Days after

Planting

7

6 -

s-

4

Figure 19. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Texture Score

-A- 91G5163

0 5256Er 5402

0 5403I 5405

0 54160 5421

65 66

Days afterJune 4planting

60 61 62 6358 59 64

7

458 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66

Days afterJune 4

Figure 20. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel, planting

Multi-Harvest, Mean Overall Quality Score

wiitie 91G5163

0 52565402

0 54035405

0 5416--II 5421

s9jASPIPANWINVI.444)S, 4'11" 4'Sample Line

Figure 1. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Single Harvest, Mean Appearance Scores

Figure 2. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel,Single Harvest, Mean Color Scores

Figure 4. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Single Harvest, Mean Texture Scores

.9).ONA:tkVreaNNIPqrSelriNS,Sample Line

'304)4.8401;tvq24rqpViNi>6:triNS, 'It&iprV 4C's

Sample Line

Figure 3. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Single Harvest, Mean Flavor Scores

Figure 5. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Single Harvest, Mean Overall Quality Scores

6W

::in

NK

c,A 9' 0

'123

'

3

F*:,.

.:Am

clo:

::::,

gib

SI

aa

7,

,toI

43,5

>

I

trffi

lagi

SA

I

,f),:T

.glii

gglig

tlg.W

M:1

I

c5s4

r41:

Efi

Tim

-174

1

q's"

om

i:Am

mil

"Iga

ilint

M

dt 6

g:11

WO

O.::

:74:

2M1K

i:::::

a

A 0

so "

taas

VO

D-n

saC

O03

cc "03

cif

to3 :4

NO

M=

F

30

NA

3

S

ME

E=

non

CO

0F

A 3 co 3 IIN

r-

(lo m

3 3

dff'

4-M

EM

EN

Eco

ME

M=

NE

ESS

EN

ce-

ceg.

EIE

NN

EI I

g 'o

5ro

'

ME

MO

=0 a

5.

0

41,s

ME

NE

E

IMM

O

0 w

0 0

g(6, 0 -

3 3. c

"

.3 to

Sve,

os's

`43

4S

t;

I 1w

%,

0'

mom

sSE

MS

4,4

sfrc

'ra

ft0

(Ps'

Mea

n O

vera

ll Q

ualif

y S

core

Mea

n T

extu

re S

core

Mea

n F

lavo

r S

core

Mea

n C

olor

Sco

reM

ean

App

eara

nce

Sco

re

7

6-

4

7-

6-

4

7

g

5-

4

7

6-

5-

A

Ao-56 57 58 59 80 61 75 76 77 78 Days

June 3 Planting May 3 Planting

Figure 11. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans. Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Appearance Score

Figure 12. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans. Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Color Score

is7isis6061 is ;6 77 78 Days

June 15 Planing May 3 Planting

Figure 13. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans - Industry Panel,Mufti-Harvest, Mean Flavor Score

Figure 14. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Texture Score

Figure 15. 1990-91 Canned Green Beans. Industry Panel,Multi-Harvest, Mean Overall Quality Score.

.41r. 9100 5163

CF- 5256A 5402

0 5403540554165421

A. 9105516352563

A 5402

54050 54160 5421

A. 910A 5163

$2502456

0 5403II 54055416

A- 91

51835256

54020 5403

54050 5416.111 5421

56 57 58 59 60 75 76 77 78 Days

June / 5 Planting May 3 Planing

4is 4 is 4 4 4 is 1 is DltY5

June /5 Planting May 3 Planting

June 15 Planing

4 4 58 59 10 61 75 76 77 78 Days

May 3 Planting

7-

a 8- a a

-

8

4

58 55 60 61 62 69 54 es 66 Days after

Figure 16. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans. Industry Panel, parjuln,24

Multi-Harvest, Mean Appearance Score

7-

6-

5-

4 54 39 60 6/ 62 49 64 65 66

Figure 17. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel, Days Juneafter

4 Multi-Harvest, Mean Color Score planYng

5

4

55 59 60 61 52 63 64 65 56

Days after Figure 18. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel, June 4

Multi-Harvest, Mean Flavor Score poor*

7- Air

$163

5250 .A 5402 0 5403

5405

5418

5421

4

Figure 19. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel, Multi-Harvest, Mean Texture Score

7-

4

se

-r""11C4111111111.11111111111111

60 81 62 63 64

Figure 20. 1990-91 Frozen Green Beans - Industry Panel, Multi-Harvest, Mean Overall Quality Score

A- 910 A $183

0 5256

5402 CI-- 5403 III 5405

5418 5421

g-- 5 Ar 91161

552563

ttc 5402

551°456

--411 5421

as es Days after

-lune 4 planbng

411r. 01 --311 5183 0 5256

5402

5403 5405

0 5418 -.4b 5421

65 66 Days after

June 4 planting

aro 11 ea ea 64

A- 91 o 5163

0 5256 Es 5402 a-- 5403

5405 0 me 4111 5421

e

7