PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al....

20

Transcript of PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al....

Page 1: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 2: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 3: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 4: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 5: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 6: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of

CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; MPT, melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide; PR, partial response; Rd, lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone; Rd18, Rd for 18 cycles;

VGPR, very good partial response.

Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of Response in Patients With Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. EHA

2015, abstract #P277.

6

Page 7: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 8: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of

8

LEN MNTCa

(n = 231)PLACEBO(n = 229)

INTERIM ANALYSIS AND UNBLINDING DEC 2009

CROSSOVER BEFORE PD ALLOWED

CONTINUEDTREATMENT ALL TREATMENT

DISCONTINUEDJan 2011

NO CROSSOVER BEFORE PD ALLOWED

LEN: 2 COURSES

LEN MNTCa

(n = 307)PLACEBO(n = 307)

CONTINUED TREATMENT

MPR: 6 COURSES

2 × 2 DESIGNLEN + DEX × 4

INDUCTION

LEN MNTCb

(n = 67)

NO TREATMENT

(n = 68)

LEN MNTCb

NO TREATMENT

ASCT

CONTINUED TREATMENT

CONTINUED TREATMENT

Page 9: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of

9

0.00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

605 578 555 509 474 431 385 282 200 95 20 1 0

604 569 542 505 458 425 350 271 174 71 10 0

Overall Survival, mos

Su

rviv

al

Pro

ba

bilit

y

Patients

at risk

7-yr OS

62%

50%

LENALIDOMIDE CONTROL

0.74 (0.62-0.89)

.001

Page 10: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 11: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 12: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of

Page 13: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of

Page 14: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 15: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 16: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 17: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 18: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of

Page 19: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of
Page 20: PowerPoint Presentation - Myeloma Academy · VGPR, very good partial response. Bahlis N et al. Assessing the Benefit of Continuous Treatment in the FIRST Trial (MM-020): Impact of