Power Reservation-Based Admission Control Scheme for IEEE 802.16e OFDMA Systems
-
Upload
murphy-nieves -
Category
Documents
-
view
33 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Power Reservation-Based Admission Control Scheme for IEEE 802.16e OFDMA Systems
Power Reservation-Based Admission Control Scheme for
IEEE 802.16e OFDMA Systems
Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2007.WCNC 2007. IEEEYu, Guanding; Zhang, Zhaoyang; Qin, Chi; Jia, Huiling;
Huang, Aiping
Outline
Introduction System Model Resource Allocation Algorithm Power Reservation-Based Admission
Control Simulation Results Conclusion
Introduction
In IEEE 802.16e MSs may change their serving cells several times handoff droppings
Call admission control (CAC)limiting the amount of radio resource a
llocation
Two reasons for these channel reservation schemes are not competent in IEEE 802.16e First, in WiMAX systems with OFDMA PHY, high spect
rum utilization is achieved by efficient and flexible channel and power allocation reserving a number of channels for handoff calls will p
otentially result in poor spectrum utilization Second, there exists a fundamental tradeoff between b
andwidth resource and power resource. For a mobile station (MS) with a given channel conditi
on and a fixed data rate requirement, its total power requirement decreases with the increasing amount of bandwidth allocated to it
1 MHz2 MHz
4.0 bit/s/Hz
1 unit powerper channel
2.0 bit/s/Hz
0.5 unit powerper channel
Requirement1M/s
Motivation
Reduce the co-channel interference to the neighbor cells & Improve the downlink system capacity to minimize the overall transmit power of
each base station (BS) by making full use of the total available bandwidth
The transmit power of the BS serves as indicator of the traffic load A novel admission control scheme based on
reservation of the power resource in each BS
System Model
Network Model IEEE 802.16e cellular system consisting of 1
9 cells• the cell radius is set to 1Km• All the MSs are uniformly distributed throughout th
e whole system topology• The frequency reuse factor of 3 is adopted• The center frequency ( cf ) is 3.5GHz• The total bandwidth in each cell ( tB ) is 10MHz• The technique of adaptive modulation and coding
(AMC) is used
Traffic Model
Only real-time services with fixed data rate requirements are considered which ranges uniformly between 250
Kbps and 700 KbpsBoth new calls and handoff calls arrive
according to a Poisson processCall duration is exponentially
distributed with the mean of 120 seconds
Resource Allocation Algorithm
For simplicity, only downlink real-time traffic with strict data rate requirement is considered
The optimization objective of this resource allocation problem is to minimize the overall transmit power of the BS while guarantee the data rate requirements of all users
The resource allocation problem
QAM 64
DR requirement
QPSK 3/4QPSK 3/4
>
The number of subchannels required by user
i
The required transmit power on each subchannel
The required power from the BS to user
N denote the total number of available subchannelsP denote the maximum transmit power in the BSM active calls
Ri data rate requirement of the user is (1<= i<= M )user’s AMC level is set to MCi
DR(MCi): data rate per unit of MCif(MCi): SINR requirementB0 denotes the bandwidth of each subchannel
ηis the thermal noiseIi denotes the co-channel interferenceGi denotes the channel gain of the link
QAM 16
co-channel interference
The details of this algorithm
Example
3 MHz
2 MHz
4.5 bit/s/Hz
30 unit power1.0 per channel
4.5 bit/s/Hz
22 unit power1.1 per channel
TotalBandwidth10MHz
1 MHz 4.5 bit/s/Hz
12 unit power1.2 per channel
Initializes MCi = Lmax Next lower ACM level
3.4 MHz
2.3 MHz
4.0 bit/s/Hz
30.6 unit power0.9 per channel
4.0 bit/s/Hz
23 unit power1 per channel
1.2 MHz 4.0 bit/s/Hz
13.2 unit power1.1 per channel
User 1
User 2
User 3
30.6-30/34-30=0.15
Subchannel = 0.1 MHz 23-22/23-20=0.333
13.2-12/12-10=0.6Next lower ACM level again
1.5 MHz 3.0 bit/s/Hz
0.8 unit power
13.5M/s
9M/s
4.5M/s
Power Reservation-Based Admission Control two kinds of handoffs
Inter-cell handoff• Dropping occurs
• no sufficient resource for the incoming handoff request in the target cell
Intra-cell handoff • resource reassignment to maintain the Qo
S requirements and outage may happen because of resource insufficiency
Overall reserved power in the BS
P’ and P’’ respectively denote the total power requirements as N subchannels and
subchannels are occupied in all
Determination of the Reservation Factors K and β
in view of the tradeoff between handoff dropping rate and new call blocking ratewe determine the values of the reserv
ation factors based on the optimization of the grade of service(GoS) performance
Simulation Results
the total number of subchannels in each cell is set to 150
the overall transmit power of each BS is restricted to 100W
the thermal noise is -90dBm The random walk mobility model is adopted
to each MS, with an average velocity of 120km/h
The traffic load is configuredρset to 0.6, 0.65, 0.7
Forced termination probability of inter-cell handoff and new call blocking probability versus K
GoS versus K at traffic load 0.6, 0.65 and 0.7 (β=0)
Forced termination probability of intra-cell handoff and new call blocking probability versus β
GoS versus β at traffic load 0.6, 0.65 and 0.7 (K=0)
Approximate Solution vs. Optimal Solution
Conclusion
A new call admission control strategy based on power reservation
In order to balance the handoff call dropping rate and new call blocking rate, we introduce an optimization model to find the optimal and based on GoS metric
Simulation results show that the suboptimal solution is close to the optimal solution.
Thank you!!