Power FINFET, a Novel Superjunction Power MOSFETngwt/publications/other...Power FINFET CMOSET, June...
Transcript of Power FINFET, a Novel Superjunction Power MOSFETngwt/publications/other...Power FINFET CMOSET, June...
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
1University of Toronto
Wai Tung Ng
Smart Power Integration & Semiconductor Devices Research Group
Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of Toronto
Toronto, OntarioCanada, M5S 3G4
E-mail: [email protected]
© 2011
Power FINFET, a Novel Superjunction Power MOSFET
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
2University of Toronto
OutlineOverview of Power Semiconductor DevicesDesign issues for Low Voltage Super-Junction
DevicesA Low Voltage Lateral Super-Junction FINFET Basic Idea of SJ-FINFET Structure Device Simulation Works Process Flow and IC Fabrication Experimental Results
Summary
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
3University of Toronto
Applications of Smart Power ICs
Supply Voltage (V)
Load
Cur
rent
(A)
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.0011 10 100 1000
Telecom
Display
Digital
Bipolarlinear
AC Motors
FluorescentBallast
SwitchingRegulators
LinearRegulator
Automotive
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
4University of Toronto
Worldwide Power Semiconductor Market
LV LV LV LV
LV LV
SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR
$16B
Source: M. Vukicevic, Data Processing Market to Dominate Power Semiconductor Market in 2007: Market Tracker, iSuppli Corp., Q1, 2007.
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
5University of Toronto
p-substrate
p-wellp+
n-well
drain sourcesource/body drain
HV p-EDMOSHV n-EDMOS
n+SiO2 SiO2 p+ p+n+ p+
SiO2 SiO2 p+ n+
p-wellHV n-well
source source/body drain source/bodysource/body
Floating Source HV n-FSMOS
n+SiO2 n+
SiO2 p+ n+SiO2 SiO2 p+n+ n+
SiO2SiO2
p-substrate
p-well n-well
drain bodysource drain
HV p-EDSMOSHV n-EDSMOS
p+ p+
p-well
body source drain source/bodysource/body
Low Voltage CMOS
p+ n+p+ n+SiO2 SiO2SiO2p+
SiO2SiO2n+SiO2SiO2 n+
SiO2 SiO2 n+ p+ p+SiO2n+
SiO2
n-well
n-drift region n-drift region
n-drift region n-drift region
p-drift region
p-drift region p-drift region
Tox = 780Å
Tox = 120Å
HVNMOS process (cont’d)Another example of CMOS compatible HV-CMOS with
a variety of 40V devices with minimal process changes.
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
6University of Toronto
Source
n+
p
n+
p+
Drain
Gate
Oxide
n-
n-
n
pn
np
Source
n+
p
n+
p+
Drain
Gate
Oxide
Lateral Super-Junction Power MOSFETs Super-Junction (SJ) power MOSFET is a promising
device to achieve a low Ron,sp because the drift region iscomposed of heavily doped alternating n/p-pillars. However,conventional SJ structure is not very attractive for lowvoltage MOSFETs (<100V) due to the fact that the channelresistance becomes comparable to the drift regionresistance at low voltage ratings.
Conventional LDMOSFET Superjunction LDMOSFET
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
7University of Toronto
y
z
xp
np
np
dd
Vds
Vgs
S
G
D
lz
lx
ly
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10 100 1000
Breakdown voltage (V)
Spe
cific
on-
resi
stan
ce (m
Ωcm
2)
Fujihira, Fuji, JJAP, 1997
Si-limit
SJ Devices (Lz = 10µm)
Si Majority-Carrier Lateral Devices
Impact of the p/n pillar thickness
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
8University of Toronto
Features of Super-Junction MOSFETs Drift region structure: n-drift region replaced by
alternatively stacked, charge-coupled/heavily doped,n- and p- thin layers or pillars.
Low specific on-resistance: Current flow onlythrough the heavily doped parallel n-pillars.
High breakdown voltage: requires full-depletion ofSJ structures (a space-charged region, acting like apure intrinsic layer); simply depends on drift regionlength; independent on dose.
Charge counterbalance condition: controlling thedoping of p- and n-type SJ layers according to theRESURF theory.
Fabrication process: complicated and need preciseprocess controls.
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
9University of Toronto
Lateral Power Devices – PerformanceBV vs. Ron-sp
has been a performance matrix that many researchers have been chasing for years.
Ron-sp for power devices in the low voltage range (<100V) depends on many factors. 10 100 1000
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
Thick drift LDMOS
SJ-LDMOS/SOS[13]
d=5μm
Toshiba-0.8μmCMOS/BESOI[4]
Motorola[3]
LUDMOS[10]
BCD5[7]IDLDMOS[14]
Dual path double-resurf LDMOS[11]
Unbalanced SJ-LDMOS[12]
Si_Limit[8],[9] SJVDMOS[9] Cool_MOS[9] SOI Resurf[2]-[6] HexLDMOS Simple Resurf Data Source
Ron
,sp
[ m
Ω−c
m2 ]
BVdss [ V ]
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
10University of Toronto
Main Issue: Low Voltage SJ-MOSFETs
Sub-200V
Si-limit
Miura et al , NEC, ISPSD, 2005
Chen et al, NUS, ISPSD, 2007
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
11University of Toronto
Reduction of channel resistance Reduction of n-drift resistance E-field relaxation (i.e. higher BV) More efficient use of silicon
SOI substrate
n-drift region
Drain
Source
Gate
SOI substrate
Fill trench with p-pillar to form SJ device
Z
X
Y
Basic Idea of SJ-FINFET Structure
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
12University of Toronto
Cross-section: A-A’
SJ unit-cell SJ unit-cell
BOX
p-body
0.3
WtopP
oly-Si
0.6 0.3
1.0
Wside
2 .5
TGox
0.035
Cross-section: B-B’
SJ unit-cell SJ unit-cell
(Sn)(Sp)
BOX
DTI
p-drift
n-drift
Wp0.3 Wn 0.3 0.3 0.3
0.5
0.5
2 .5
Wtop
Wside
C X Y
Z
n
n
Gate
Tepi
p S
BOX
p-substrate
Wp
Drain
B
B’
2·Wn
A’
p-body
Wside
Wtop
p
n
n
p
Lch Ldriftn+n+
Source
p+
Wnn+
DTI
C C’
n+
A
Proposed Lateral SJ-FINFET Structure
Compatibility with modern CMOS process is anessential design consideration
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
13University of Toronto
(a) p-body implant (b) SJ-drift trench & implant (c) p-pillar diffusion (d) gate trench
(e) n-doped poly-Si gate (f) n+ source implant (g) p+ contact opening (h) Al metallization
Process Flow for the SJ-FINFET Structure
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
14University of Toronto
Parameters for 3D SimulationsThese
parameters were also used in the fabrication of the prototypes.
Parameters ValuesDrift length, Ldrift (µm) 3 to 12n-drift width, Wn (µm) 0.6n-drift doping conc., ND (cm-3) 7.4 × 1016
p-drift width, Wp (µm) 0.3p-drift doping conc., NA (cm-3) 7.4 to 9.8 × 1016
p-body doping conc., Np-body (cm-3) 5.0 × 1017
p-substrate doping conc., Nsub (cm-3) 2.0 × 1014
n+ source/drain contact, Ns/d (cm-3) 1.0 × 1020
p+ contact, Np+(cm-3) 5.0 × 1019
Gate oxide thickness, TGox (nm) 35Top channel width, Wtop (µm) 0.6Side channel width, Wside (µm) 2.0 and 3.0Gate length, Lgate (µm) 1.0Channel length, Lch (µm) 0.5SOI thickness, Tepi (µm) 2.6 and 3.6DTI depth (µm) 2.0 and 3.0Buried oxide thickness, Tbox (µm) 2.0
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
15University of Toronto
SJ unit-cell (w/ DTI & Gox)
SJ unit-cell (w/o DTI & Gox)
Drain
Source
SJ drift
DTIGate
Drain
Sourcep-driftchannel
BOXp-sub
p-body
p-body
p-sub
SJ-FINFET — Initial MESH Structure
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
16University of Toronto
Formation of the p/n pillars
Phosphorus
Boron
P-pillarN-epi
B, 8e13 cm-2, 45 keV, ± 12°
@ Y = -3Implant After
annealing
N-epi
P-pillar
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
17University of Toronto
Formation of the n+ source/drain contacts
N+P-body
N-epi.
Phosphorus
Boron
Arsenic
N+
P-bodyN-epi
P, 5e14 cm-2, 180 keV, ± 45°As, 9e14 cm-2, 200 keV, ± 45°@ Y = -3
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
18University of Toronto
1E-09
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
1E-04
0 50 100 150 200
I ds
(A)
Vds (V)
@Ld=3.0μm
@Ld=3.5μm
@Ld=4.0μm
@Ld=4.5μm
@Ld=5.0μm
@Ld=6.0μm
@Ld=8.0μm
@Ld=12.0μm
0
100
200
300
400
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
I ds
(A/c
m2
)
Vds (V)
@Ld=3.0μm
@Ld=3.5μm
@Ld=4.0μm
@Ld=4.5μm
@Ld=5.0μm
@Ld=6.0μm
@Ld=8.0μm
@Ld=12.0μm
On-state @ Vg=10V
@ Vds=1V, Ldrift = 3.0µm
Vth ~1.7V
Wn = Wp = 0.3µm
Np-drift = 9.5e16/cm3
Nn-drift = 7.4e16/cm3
@ Ldrift = 3.0µm
Off-state
SJ-FINFT — Device Simulation Results
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
19University of Toronto
40
60
80
100
120
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0
BV
(V)
Charge imbalance (Nn-Np)/Np (%)
Wside / Ldrift = 2µm / 6µm
Wside / Ldrift = 3µm / 6µm
Wside / Ldrift = 2µm / 3µm
Wside / Ldrift = 3µm / 3µm
Other Published Data
SJ-FINFT — Device Simulation Results (cont’d)
0.1
1
10 100
Spec
ific
on-
resi
stan
ce (m
Ω·c
m2
)
Breakdown voltage (V)
∝BV1.9-2.0
Simulated conventional lateral SJ-LDMOS
Simulated SJ-FINFET
(О: 2µm and ∆: 3µm)
Si-limit: ∝BV2.5
90V 165V
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
20University of Toronto
SJ-FINFT: Device Simulation Results
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 1 2 3 4 5
R on,
sp(m
Ω·c
m2 )
Y-distance (μm)
@ Lgate=1µm, Lch=0.5µm, Ldrift=3µm
Rch Rn-drift RdrainRsource
Gate
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0 1 2 3 4 5
E fie
ld(x
105 V
/cm
)
Ldrift (μm)
n-driftsource drain
SJ SOI-LDMOS
SJ-FINFET
Wside = 2µm
Wside= 3µm
Source Gate n-drift Drain
Relaxing the electric field at this point achieves higher breakdown voltage
channel
Ec for Si ~ 5 x 105 V/cm, BV~(Ec·Ldrift) / 2
SJ-FINFT — Device Simulation Results (cont’d)
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
21University of Toronto
50000µm (Mask=5cm, Die=1cm)
5000
0µm
(Mas
k=5c
m, D
ie=1
cm)
Total 9 Mask Layers
Final Chip Layout & Die Image
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
22University of Toronto
P-pillar Trench
Source Trench
Drain Trench
Poly-Si: Top Gate
Ldrift
Poly-Si: Trench Gate
Drain
Gate
Poly-Si: Top Gate
Poly-Si: Trench Gate P-pillar TrenchSource
Drain
Gate
Poly-Si: Top Gate
Poly-Si: Trench Gate P-pillar Trench
Source
Fabricated SJ-FINFETs: Optical & SEM Images
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
23University of Toronto
Ldrift = 3.5µm Ldrift = 6.0µm
Ldrift = 10.0µm Ldrift = 12.0µm
SJ-FINFETs: After Al-Metallization
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
24University of Toronto
Measured Data: Transfer I-V CharacteristicsLdrift=3.5µm, W=200µm, Tox = 35nm @ Vds = 0.1V
0E+00
1E-03
2E-03
3E-03
4E-03
5E-03
6E-03
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
I ds
(A)
Vgate (V)
Vth ~ 1.7V
The measured threshold voltage of the SJ-FINFET was approximately 1.7V
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
25University of Toronto
The Ron,sp of the SJ-FINFET is approximately 30% smaller than that of the conventional SJ-LDMOSFET.
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
I ds(A
)
Vds (V)
Vg= 2V
Vg= 4V
Vg= 6V
Vg= 8V
Vg= 10V
SJ-FINFET: Ldrift=3.5µm, W=200µm
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
I ds(A
)
Vds (V)
SJ-LDMOS: Ldrift=3.5µm, W=200µm
Vg= 2V
Vg= 4V
Vg= 6V
Vg= 8V
Vg= 10V
Measured Data: Output I-V Characteristics
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
26University of Toronto
The measured data is comparable with other published data and it shows a good agreement in the data trend between the simulation and measurement. For similar BV ratings, about 30% lower Ron,sp was found in the fabricated
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Spe
cific
on-
resi
stan
ce (m
Ω·c
m2
)
Breakdown voltage (V)
Other published data
Simulated SJ-FINFET
Fabricated SJ-FINFET
Fabricated SJ-LDMOS
Fabricated SJ-LDMOS
Fabricated SJ-FINFET
Simulated SJ-FINFET
Si-limit
Data from [1], [3], [7] are for conventional LDMOSFETs
Data from [2], [4]-[6] are for conventional SJ-LDMOSFETs
[1][2]
[3]
[1][3]
[6]
[4] [5]
[7]
Measured Data: BV versus Ron,sp
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
27University of Toronto
Summary Low voltage lateral SJ-FINFET devices with deep
trench p-drift region were proposed and fabricated to improve the electrical characteristics of conventional planar gate SJ-LDMOSFETs.
For the similar BV ratings, the specific on-resistances of the fabricated SJ-FINFET devices were approximately 30% lower than that of the fabricated SJ-LDMOSFETs.
The current work represents the first experimental confirmation that the super-junction concept is advantageous for sub-200V applications.
More details will be presented at IEDM 2010.
CMOSET, June 16, 2011Power FINFET
28University of Toronto
Acknowledgements Visiting Scientist: Yasuhiko Onishi, Fuji Electric, JapanProf. Johnny K. O. Sin,
Hong Kong University of Science & TechnologyStaff in Nano-electronic Fabrication Facility (NFF),
Hong Kong University of Science & TechnologyAuto21 Networks of Centres of Excellence of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of
CanadaU of T Open Fellowship