Poster asa-2011-tyndall-final

1
The details of this experiment, “a new and extremely delicate method of determining the amount of carbonic acid in air expired from the lungs”[4] were reported in July 1864 in Philosophical Magazine (Figure 3) [2] (Note 1) by Mr. W. F. Barrett (Figure 2) (Note 2), a young assistant of Dr. Tyndall’s in the Physical Laboratory of the Royal Institution. A portion of the experiment consisted of collecting from subjects expired air in rubber bags before and after breakfast and after severe exertion. The contents of these bags are emptied into an exhausted brass cylinder (over 4 ft in length with its ends stopped by polished plates of rock salt) through which infrared radiation, generated by a flame of carbonic oxide (i.e. carbon monoxide) gas placed at one end of the cylinder, passes. The amount of heat “intercepted by the breath” is measured by a delicate thermo-electric pile at the opposite end of the cylinder interfaced to a galvanometer. The deflection of galvanometer is converted to a absorption of total radiation which in turn is mapped to gas tension using a predetermined “calibration” table (Figure 4). The percentage of carbonic acid is computed from this gas tension value and compared to the values determined by chemical analysis [5] which at that time employed potash to absorb the CO 2 and measured the remaining gas to determine the amount of CO 2 absorbed. The potential clinical application of these “On a physical analysis of the human breath” – The first infrared measurements of CO 2 in the human breath Michael B. Jaffe PhD, Philips-Respironics, Wallingford, CT John Tyndall (1820–1893), studied the radiative properties of various gases, and constructed the first ratio spectrophotometer (Figure 1), which he used to measure the absorption of gases, including water vapor, “carbonic acid” (now known as CO 2 ), ozone, and hydrocarbons. He also observed the large differences in the ability of “perfectly colorless and invisible gases and vapors” to absorb and transmit radiant heat, and noted that oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen are almost transparent to radiant heat, but that water vapor, CO 2 , and ozone are very good absorbers of heat radiation, and that “even in small quantities, these gases absorb much more strongly than the atmosphere itself” [1] Tyndall reported, in his famous Rede Lecture in May 1865 “On Radiation” at Cambridge University, perhaps the earliest infrared quantitative measurement of carbon dioxide in the human breath in the context of a lecture on thermal radiation. These measurements demonstrated sensitivity to the way different 1.Tyndall, J. On Radiation. The “Rede” Lecture Tuesday, May 16, Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts & Green, London. 62 pages, 1865. 2.Barrett, WF. On a physical analysis of the human breath. Phil. Mag. XXVIII., 1864, 108-121. 3.Wells DA (editor). Year-book of facts in science and art for 1865. Gould and Lincoln, Boston, 1865, 245-6. 4.The Intellectual Observer – Review of Natural History, Microscopic research and recreative science, Vol. VI, Groombridge and Sons, London 1865, p 226. 5.Rose . A practical treatise of chemical analysis – Vol. II Quantitative. William Tegg and Co., London, 1849. p. 534. 6.Noakes, R., The “Bridge Which Is Between Physical and Psychical Research”: -William Fletcher Barrett, Sensitive Flames, and Spiritualism. History of Science, 2004. vol. 42, 419-464. 7.Barton R. Just before Nature: The purposes of References References 8/11/11 MBJ Figure 2 - Sir William Fletcher Barrett, 2 June 1920 © National Portrait Gallery, London Figure 1 - Tyndall's experimental apparatus, shown here consisted of a long tube that he filled with various gases. The ends of the tube were capped with slabs of rock salt crystal, a substance known to be highly transparent to heat radiation. The Leslie cube was heated with a flame and emitted radiation that traversed the tube and interacted with the gas before entering one cone of a differential thermopile. Radiation from a second Leslie cube passed through a screen and entered the other cone. The common apex of the two cones, containing the differential thermopile junction, was connected in series to a galvanometer that measured small voltage differences. The intensity of the two sources of radiation entering the two cones could be compared by measuring the deflection of the galvanometer, which is proportional to the temperature difference across the thermopile. Different gases in the tube would cause varying amounts of deflection of the galvanometer needle. If the intensity of the reference source of radiation was known, the intensity of the other source (and thus the absorptive power of the gas in the tube) could be calculated. (4) Footnotes Footnotes Figure 3 - Cover of Philosophical Magazine containing Barrett paper on measurement of CO 2 in breath (1)The Philosophical Magazine, one of the oldest scientific journals published in English, was first published in 1798, and has been published by Taylor & Francis ever since. (2)William Fletcher Barrett (1844-1925) (knighted in 1912 for his scientific work) served as an assistant to John Tyndall at the Royal Institution (1863-1866). Reference 2 was Barrett’s first research paper in a long career that included experiments and publications in material science (e.g. developed stalloy-telephone, transformeres), ophthalmology (e.g. built an early entoptoscope-instrument for examining the media of the eyes, to ascertain their transparency) and paranormal areas. In 1873 he became Professor of Experimental Physics at the Royal College of Science for Ireland. Barrett became interested in psychic phenomena in the 1870s after experimenting with hypnosis and soon sought to make psychical research a branch of physics. [6] He was a founding member of the Society for Psychical Research (1882) and .the American Society of Psychical Research (1884). Barrett after experimentation with divining rods (and dowsing) in the late 1890s concluded that the ideomotor response was responsible for the rod's movements. [6] (3)The Intellectual Observer, a popular science journal of the 1860’s, under its Notes and Memoranda section Figure 5- Publications summarizing Bartlett’s 1864 paper on CO2 measurement in the human breath . (a) – Mapping between gas tension and absorption of CO 2 in dried air (b) Table of measured absorptions of 8 bags of breath air, gas tension (determined using Table XIII) and percentage by absorption and by independent chemical analysis (for bags 1-4). Figure 4 – Estimation from of percent CO 2 in breath (Tables from Barrett)[2]

Transcript of Poster asa-2011-tyndall-final

Page 1: Poster asa-2011-tyndall-final

The details of this experiment, “a new and extremely delicate method of determining the amount of carbonic acid in air expired from the lungs”[4] were reported in July 1864 in Philosophical Magazine (Figure 3) [2] (Note 1) by Mr. W. F. Barrett (Figure 2) (Note 2), a young assistant of Dr. Tyndall’s in the Physical Laboratory of the Royal Institution.

A portion of the experiment consisted of collecting from subjects expired air in rubber bags before and after breakfast and after severe exertion. The contents of these bags are emptied into an exhausted brass cylinder (over 4 ft in length with its ends stopped by polished plates of rock salt) through which infrared radiation, generated by a flame of carbonic oxide (i.e. carbon monoxide) gas placed at one end of the cylinder, passes. The amount of heat “intercepted by the breath” is measured by a delicate thermo-electric pile at the opposite end of the cylinder interfaced to a galvanometer. The deflection of galvanometer is converted to a absorption of total radiation which in turn is mapped to gas tension using a predetermined “calibration” table (Figure 4). The percentage of carbonic acid is computed from this gas tension value and compared to the values determined by chemical analysis [5] which at that time employed potash to absorb the CO2 and measured the remaining gas to determine the amount of CO2 absorbed.

The potential clinical application of these measurements, characterized as “remarkable experiments” [3] , were soon recognized by some of the important publications of the time [3,4] (Figure 5)(Note 3) which presented summaries of” important new facts and theories in every department of science” intended for a wide audience and noted of these measurements “For this purpose its application in hospitals has already been suggested by eminent men.” [3]

“On a physical analysis of the human breath” – The first infrared measurements of CO2 in the human breath

“On a physical analysis of the human breath” – The first infrared measurements of CO2 in the human breath

Michael B. Jaffe PhD, Philips-Respironics, Wallingford, CTMichael B. Jaffe PhD, Philips-Respironics, Wallingford, CT

John Tyndall (1820–1893), studied the radiative properties of various gases, and constructed the first ratio spectrophotometer (Figure 1), which he used to measure the absorption of gases, including water vapor, “carbonic acid” (now known as CO2), ozone, and hydrocarbons.

He also observed the large differences in the ability of “perfectly colorless and invisible gases and vapors” to absorb and transmit radiant heat, and noted that oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen are almost transparent to radiant heat, but that water vapor, CO2, and ozone are very good absorbers of heat radiation, and that “even in small quantities, these gases absorb much more strongly than the atmosphere itself” [1] Tyndall reported, in his famous Rede Lecture in May 1865 “On Radiation” at Cambridge University, perhaps the earliest infrared quantitative measurement of carbon dioxide in the human breath in the context of a lecture on thermal radiation. These measurements demonstrated sensitivity to the way different molecules absorb infrared radiation. Since the human breath had has a significantly higher percentage of carbon dioxide than the atmosphere, it provided an easy source of the gas to demonstrate infrared absorption.

1. Tyndall, J. On Radiation. The “Rede” Lecture Tuesday, May 16, Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts & Green, London. 62 pages, 1865.

2. Barrett, WF. On a physical analysis of the human breath. Phil. Mag. XXVIII., 1864, 108-121.

3. Wells DA (editor). Year-book of facts in science and art for 1865. Gould and Lincoln, Boston, 1865, 245-6.

4. The Intellectual Observer – Review of Natural History, Microscopic research and recreative science, Vol. VI, Groombridge and Sons, London 1865, p 226.

5. Rose . A practical treatise of chemical analysis – Vol. II Quantitative. William Tegg and Co., London, 1849. p. 534.

6. Noakes, R., The “Bridge Which Is Between Physical and Psychical Research”: -William Fletcher Barrett, Sensitive Flames, and Spiritualism. History of Science, 2004. vol. 42, 419-464.

7. Barton R. Just before Nature: The purposes of science and the purposes of popularization in some English popular science journals of the 1860s Annals of Science , 1998, vol 55(1), p 1-33.

ReferencesReferences

8/11/11 MBJ

Figure 2 - Sir William Fletcher Barrett, 2 June 1920 © National Portrait Gallery, London

Figure 1 - Tyndall's experimental apparatus, shown here consisted of a long tube that he filled with various gases. The ends of the tube were capped with slabs of rock salt crystal, a substance known to be highly transparent to heat radiation. The Leslie cube was heated with a flame and emitted radiation that traversed the tube and interacted with the gas before entering one cone of a differential thermopile. Radiation from a second Leslie cube passed through a screen and entered the other cone. The common apex of the two cones, containing the differential thermopile junction, was connected in series to a galvanometer that measured small voltage differences. The intensity of the two sources of radiation entering the two cones could be compared by measuring the deflection of the galvanometer, which is proportional to the temperature difference across the thermopile. Different gases in the tube would cause varying amounts of deflection of the galvanometer needle. If the intensity of the reference source of radiation was known, the intensity of the other source (and thus the absorptive power of the gas in the tube) could be calculated. (4)

FootnotesFootnotes

Figure 3 - Cover of Philosophical Magazine containing Barrett paper on measurement of CO2 in breath

(1) The Philosophical Magazine, one of the oldest scientific journals published in English, was first published in 1798, and has been published by Taylor & Francis ever since.

(2) William Fletcher Barrett (1844-1925) (knighted in 1912 for his scientific work) served as an assistant to John Tyndall at the Royal Institution (1863-1866). Reference 2 was Barrett’s first research paper in a long career that included experiments and publications in material science (e.g. developed stalloy-telephone, transformeres), ophthalmology (e.g. built an early entoptoscope-instrument for examining the media of the eyes, to ascertain their transparency) and paranormal areas. In 1873 he became Professor of Experimental Physics at the Royal College of Science for Ireland. Barrett became interested in psychic phenomena in the 1870s after experimenting with hypnosis and soon sought to make psychical research a branch of physics. [6] He was a founding member of the Society for Psychical Research (1882) and .the American Society of Psychical Research (1884). Barrett after experimentation with divining rods (and dowsing) in the late 1890s concluded that the ideomotor response was responsible for the rod's movements. [6]

(3) The Intellectual Observer, a popular science journal of the 1860’s, under its Notes and Memoranda section summarized Barrett’s experiment and speculated on its use in the hospital. Under a different name it ceased publication in 1871.

Figure 5- Publications summarizing Bartlett’s 1864 paper on CO2 measurement in the human breath .

(a) – Mapping between gas tension and absorption of CO2 in dried air

(b) Table of measured absorptions of 8 bags of breath air, gas tension (determined using Table XIII) and percentage by absorption and by independent chemical analysis (for bags 1-4).

Figure 4 – Estimation from of percent CO2 in breath (Tables from Barrett)[2]