Post-Program Evaluation Form

8/13/2019 Post-Program Evaluation Form

1/3

POST-PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM

Submit within 2 weeks after arrival from the program to: [email protected]

NAME OF PROGRAM: JENESYS 2.0 Japan ASEAN Oceanian Students & Youth Exchange

NAME: JOSEPH M. CABRERA

DATE ACCOMPLISHED: December 15, 2013

I. APPLICATION PROCESS

Please check the appropriate boxes to answer the following questions:

1. How did you learn about theprogram?

NYCWebsite

NYCTwitter

PersonalContacts

NYCFacebook

OtherOnlineBlogs orwebsite Others

2. How did you submit yourapplication? Online Courier Personal

3. Did you receive an emailacknowledging receipt of yourapplication? Yes No

Yes, butit tookmorethan aweek

4. When did you know the resultof your application?

After twoweeks

After 3weeks

Aftermorethan 3weeks

5. How were you informed aboutthe results by the NYCInternational ProgramsSecretariat?

Thruemail

Thruphonecall /SMS Both

II. PASSPORT/VISA APPLICATION PROCESS

SA = Strongly Agree / A = Agree / N = Neutral / D = Disagree / SD = Strongly Disagree SA A N D SD

1. I had a hard time applying for passport/visa

2. The secretariat gave clear instructions on how to prepare my visaapplication documents

3. The secretariat did not help me process my visa application


1. The program briefer posted on the website was clear and gavecomprehensible instructions

2. There was ample time given to prepare documents for application

3. The secretariat was helpful and accommodating to applicants

4.The application process (online/soft copy) was easier than personal orhand-carried applications (hard copy)

5. The secretariat promptly answers queries thru email or SMS


2/3



III. PRE-DEPARTURE BRIEFING

IV. PROGRAM PROPER


1. The pre-departure briefing was very informative

2. The staff who conducted the briefing was competent andknowledgeable about the program

3. We were informed of the expected obligations and outputs that weshould fulfill and submit to the NYC after the program

4.The briefing was boring

5. The briefing was too long

6. How can the pre-departure preparation be further improved?

The getting to know each other activity is not that really good. I think it needs to be improved interms of the activity and put more fun activities.

OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAM


1. Program objectives were explained by NYC secretariat and Organizer 2. Program objectives were clear

3. Activities undertaken are aligned with the objectives of the program

4. Program and program objectives were relevant

5. Program objectives stimulated sense of National Pride, unity, andfriendship with fellow youth delegates.

6. Program stimulated me to learn and know more about the countryvisited

7. Have the program objectives been met?

SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES


1. The pace of the program was too fast

2. The pace of the program was too slow

3. Activities are not conducted on time

4. Organizers are always late

5. Delegates are always late


3/3



V. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PROGRAM/ACTIVITIES

Activities Undertaken Problems Encountered Suggestions /Recommendations

Day 1Day 2

Day 3

Day 4Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

Day 9

Day 10

VI. HOW THE PROGRAM CAN BE FURTHER IMPROVED / RECOMMENDATIONS

PROCESS Problems Encountered Suggestions /Recommendations

1. APPLICATION2. PASSPORT/VISA

APPLICATION3. COORDINATION WITHNYC/ EMBASSY/TRAVEL

AGENCY/ORGANIZER

4. COORDINATION WITHCO-DELEGATES

5. PRE-DEPARTUREBRIEFING

6. DEPARTURE AT NAIA 1

7. PROGRAM PROPER

8. ARRIVAL AT NAIA 19. OBLIGATIONS TO NYC

10. POST-PROGRAMEVALUATION

Note: The Part V and VI are all blank because I 100% enjoyed and learned a lot in the said

program. I personally did not encounter problems as such which I can conclude that the

program is really prepared, well planned and well executed.

Post-Program Evaluation Form

Documents

Transcript of Post-Program Evaluation Form