Using Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) to
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS) A Staff Overview.
-
Upload
dwight-rich -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS) A Staff Overview.
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
A Staff Overview
In Partnership with OSEP’s TA Center on Positive Behavior Support
Co-Director’s: Rob Horner, University of Oregon, and George Sugai, University of Connecticut
www.pbis.orgwww.swis.org
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation and for the continued support of this federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material.
Wisconsin RtI Center
Our mission is to support schools through the phases and sustainability of their RtI system implementation.
The core reason that the Wisconsin RtI Center exists is to develop, coordinate and provide high-quality professional development and technical assistance…
as well as to gather, analyze and disseminate RtI implementation data to enhance the support of schools’ implementation.
Principles for RtI in Wisconsin:1.RtI is for ALL children and ALL educators.
2.RtI must support and provide value to effective practices.
3.Success for RtI lies within the classroom through collaboration.
4.RtI is a framework for academics and behavior together.
5.RtI supports and provides value to the use of multiple assessments to inform instructional practices.
6.RtI is something you do and not necessarily something you buy.
7.RtI emerges from and supports research and evidence based practice.
An organizational framework that guides implementation of a multi-level system of support to achieve academic and behavioral success for all
Wisconsin RtI
Response to Intervention
Is what?
An organizational frameworkthat
guides implementation of a multi-level system of support
Does what?
toachieve academic and
behavioral successfor all
For what?
Schools face a set of difficult challenges today when dealing with behavioral needs
Multiple expectations (Academic accomplishment, Social competence, Safety)
Students arrive at school with widely differing understandings of what is socially acceptable.
Traditional “get tough” and “zero tolerance” approaches are insufficient.
Faculty come with divergent visions of effective discipline
MOST EFFECTIVE TRENDS IN SCHOOL DISCIPLINE PRACTICES
• Proactive school-wide discipline systems• Social skills instruction• Academic/curricular restructuring• Behaviorally based interventions• Early screening & identification of antisocial
behavior patterns
(Biglan, 1995; Gottfredson, 1997; Colvin, et al., 1993; Lipsey, 1991, 1992; Mayer, 1995; Sugai & Horner, 1994; Tolan & Guerra, 1994; Walker, et al., 1995; Walker, et al., 1996)
What is PBIS ?
“PBIS” is a research-based systems approach designed to enhance the capacity of schools to…
effectively educate all students, including students with challenging social behaviors
adopt & sustain the use of effective instructional practices
What has research shown for schools implementing PBIS?
• Creates learning environments that proactively deal with behaviors.
• Improves support for students with specialized behavioral needs.
• Maximizes on-task behavior and increases learning time for all students.
What does PBIS emphasize?
• The PBIS decision-making process emphasizes 3 integrated elements to provide measureable outcomes for students:– DATA sources to support decision-making,– PRACTICES that support student behavior, and– SYSTEMS that support staff behavior.
Data Collection (Big 5 x 2)
• PBIS teams should analyze the following five data points and should be disaggregated by disability and ethnicity status for disproportional trends:1. Referrals by Problem Behavior,2. Referrals by Location,3. Referrals by Time,4. Referrals by Student, and5. Average referrals by Day and by Month
Improving Decision-Making
Problem Solution
From:
To:
Problem
Problem
Solving
Using
Data
Solution
Monitor
Outcome
Supporting Student Behavior
– Universal (Tier 1) instruction support for all district learners
– Targeted (Tier 2) layered interventions for areas of need determined from data analysis
– Individualized (Tier 3) layered supports required for individual students with high-needs or specific situations.
Tier 3/Intensive Level 1-5%
Tier 2/Selected Level 5-15%
Tier 1/Universal 80-90%
Increasing Intensity
LAYERS OF SUPPORT
Attendance
Math (Acceleration)
A Student’s Snapshot
Reading (Intervention)
PE
Hallway Behavior
Strengths &Challenges
Language Arts
Science
Supporting Staff Behavior
• Reduce teacher stress• Increase teacher efficacy in
teaching replacement behaviors• Support teachers in designing
classroom management systems
Six Key Elements of PBIS
1. Define, teach and acknowledge positive behaviors.
2. On-going collection and use of data for decision-making regarding implementation of systems that support effective practices.
3. Continuum of universal supports, targeted interventions, and individualized supports.
Six Elements (cont.)
4. Implement evidenced-based behavioral practices with fidelity and accountability
5. Arrange the environment to prevent the development and occurrence of problem behavior
6. Screen universally and monitor student performance and progress continually.
West Elementary, Alton, ILReduced ODRs by 719, ISSs by 47, OSSs by 27*
3965 mins. 66.1 hrs. 11 days
135 mins. 2.3 hrs.
235 mins.3.9 hrs.
3595 mins.59.9 hrs.
Staff
41020 mins. 683.7 hrs. 144 days
9720 mins.162 hrs.
16920 mins.282 hrs.
14380 mins.239.7 hrs.
Student
9345 mins.155.8 hrs. 25.9 days
1215 mins. 20.3 hrs.
940 mins. 15.7 hrs.
7190 mins.119.8 hrs.
Admin
Total TimeGained Back
OSSsISSsODRs
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-110
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
Mean Major Median Major, Elem
Elementary SchoolsMean & Median Major ODR/100 students/day2004 to 2011
N = 641 959 1316 1737 2137 2564 2979
22% reduction
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-110
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Middle Mean Middle Median
N = 256 334 423 536 672 808 889
Middle SchoolsMean & Median ODR/100 students/day2010-11
44% reduction
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-110
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
High Sch Mean High Sch Median
High SchoolsMean &Median ODR/100 students/day2010-11
N = 76 104 155 198 250 330 390
23% reduction
Suspensions - # of students – 2009/2010 to 2010/2011
2009-2010 to 2010/2011 Suspensions - # of Students - by School and Implementation Level
Elementary Middle High Pk-8
-30.00%
-20.00%
-10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
1.13% 0.75%
-10.50%
32.26%
5.36%
31.16%
-13.44%
16.67%
-10.77%
-6.40%-4.76%
-2.31%
-8.73%
1.75%
-23.06%
-16.42%
Not TrainedTrained, Not ImplementingImplementing, No FidelityFidelity
N=3
Current Status Nationally
• Main Messages:– SWPBIS is possible (over 18,200 schools)
– SWPBIS is effective at (a) reducing problem behavior, (b) improving academic achievement, and (c) improving perceived faculty effectiveness
– Coaching is critical to (a) implementation with fidelity and (b) sustained use of SWPBIS
– Coaching is perceived a major contributor to the cultural “fit” of SWPBIS to a community/ school.
SWPBIS in 13,331 schools 8/10’Al
abam
a
Alas
ka
Ariz
ona
Arka
nsas
Calif
orni
a
Colo
rado
*
Conn
ectic
ut
Del
awar
e
Flor
ida*
Geo
rgia
Haw
aii
Idah
o
Illin
ois
Indi
ana
Iow
a*
Kans
as*
Kent
ucky
Loui
sian
a*
Mai
ne
Mar
ylan
d*
Mas
sach
usett
s
Mic
higa
n
Min
neso
ta
Mis
siss
ippi
Mis
sour
i*
Mon
tana
*
Neb
rask
a
Nev
ada
New
Ham
pshi
re
New
Jers
ey*
New
Mex
ico
New
Yor
k
Nor
th C
arol
ina*
Nor
th D
akot
a*
Ohi
o
Okl
ahom
a
Ore
gon*
Penn
sylv
ania
Rhod
e Is
land
Sout
h Ca
rolin
a*
Sout
h D
akot
a
Tenn
esse
e
Texa
s
Uta
h*
Verm
ont
Virg
inia
Was
hing
ton
Stat
e
Was
hing
ton
DC
Wes
t Vir
gini
a
Wis
cons
in
Wyo
min
g
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
WisconsinIllinois
#of schools implementing PBIS by state (incomplete August 2012)Al
abam
a
Alas
ka
Ariz
ona
Arka
nsas
Calif
orni
a
Colo
rado
*
Conn
ectic
ut
Del
awar
e
Flor
ida*
Geo
rgia
Haw
aii
Idah
o
Illin
ois
Indi
ana
Iow
a*
Kans
as*
Kent
ucky
Loui
sian
a*
Mai
ne
Mar
ylan
d*
Mas
sach
usett
s
Mic
higa
n
Min
neso
ta
Mis
siss
ippi
Mis
sour
i*
Mon
tana
*
Neb
rask
a
Nev
ada
New
Ham
pshi
re
New
Jers
ey*
New
Mex
ico
New
Yor
k
Nor
th C
arol
ina*
Nor
th D
akot
a*
Ohi
o
Okl
ahom
a
Ore
gon*
Penn
sylv
ania
Rhod
e Is
land
Sout
h Ca
rolin
a*
Sout
h D
akot
a
Tenn
esse
e
Texa
s
Uta
h*
Verm
ont
Virg
inia
Was
hing
ton
Stat
e
Was
hing
ton
DC
Wes
t Vir
gini
a
Wis
cons
in
Wyo
min
g
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
• District commitment, school staff buy-in
• Coaching capacity
• Professional development plan
• Efficient data tool
How Do We Get There?
District Commitments
• High priority in District Improvement Plans• 3-5 year commitment• Continuation of the district leadership team• Ongoing staff development • Allocation of resources
Big Ideas-District
• Long term planning is essential• Funding sources• Coaching and ADMINISTRATIVE
commitment at all 3 tiers
Three-five year focus to get sustainable change Active administrative support and participation Administrative leadership for PBIS teams Commitment from staff (80%) Ongoing communication and support with staff Completion and use of data collection (discipline and
academic data, survey, checklists) Staff participation in ongoing training
Building Level CommitmentsHandout--PBIS Commitment for Success
Family Involvement or Engagement in a PBIS School?
Family involvement is often more of a “doing to,” while engagement is a “doing with.”•Involvement – schools tend to lead with their mouth – generally telling family members what to do•Engagement – schools lead with their ears – listening to family members’ ideas, and eliciting what they have found works best with their children
Larry Ferlazzo, Education Week, March 2012
Components of Family Engagement• Family member/parent academic aspirations
and expectations for children • Family member/parent-child communication
about school• Home structure that supports behavior and
learning• Family member/parent participation and
connection in school activities
Four Concepts of Family Engagement that Educators Need to Know
1.The positive effect of family engagement on student performance (academic and behavior).2.The home and cultural context of the students they teach.3.Family beliefs about ways to support children's learning.4.Specific strategies to support children’s learning.
Remember
• PBIS involves all of us
– we decide what our focus will be– we decide how we will monitor– we decide what our goals are– we decide what we’ll do to get there– we evaluate our progress– we decide whether to keep going or change
PBIS APPROACH WORKS!
• Data driven building decision-making• Clear expectations that are universally known• Focuses on positive interaction and
acknowledges appropriate behavior.• Proactive rather than reactive• Supports a positive learning environment• Delivers results
National and State Resources
• www.pbis.org• www.wisconsinPBISnetwork.org• www.SWIS.org• www.pbisassessment.org• www.apbs.org