Portfolio Performance Evaluation of Selected Sector Index of BSE

5/27/2018 Portfolio Performance Evaluation of Selected Sector Index of BSE

1/12

VOLUME NO.4(2013),ISSUE NO.09 (SEPTEMBER) ISSN0976-2183

A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories

Indexed & Listed at:

Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, ProQuest, U.S.A., EBSCO Publishing, U.S.A., Cabells Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.,

Open J-Gage, India [link of the same is duly available at Inflibnet of University Grants Commission (U.G.C.)],

Index Copernicus Publishers Panel, Polandwith IC Value of 5.09 &number of libraries all around the world.

Circulated all over the world & Google has verified that scholars of more than 2840 Cities in 164 countries/territories are visiting our journal on regular basis.

#round $loor% Buildin& 'o *+-,-% Devi Bh!w!n B!!r% JA#AD.R 01 **0% 2!3un!n!&!r% .!ry!n!% 'DA

http4//i5rc3or&in/


2/12


INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE & MANAGEMENTA Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories

http4//i5rc3or&in/

ii

CONTENTSCONTENTSCONTENTSCONTENTSSr.No. TITLE & NAME OF THE AUTHOR (S)

PageNo.

1 HOSPITALS OUTSOURCING COMPLETE DEPARTMENTS: A STUDYDR. T. LATA SUJATA, B. KRISHNA REDDY & DR. C.JAYALAKSHMI

1

2 A STUDY OF CORPORATE BOND MARKET IN INDIA AND ITS LIQUIDITYHEMA GWALANI & DR. D. B. BHARATI

5

3 FRUIT AND VEGETABLE MARKETING FOR SMALL SCALE GROWERS IN INDIA

DR. M S SUBHAS & HALASWAMY D. NAIK

! PERFORMANCE OF PROFITABILITY MANAGEMENT IN LANCO INDUSTRIES LIMITED: AN EVALUATIONN. K. PRADEEP KUMAR & P. MOHAN REDDY

12

5 KEY CHALLENGES FOR INDIAN MANAGERS: IMPACT OF FDI ENTRY IN RETAIL MARKETCHELLAM SHENBAGAM

1"

" IMPACT OF FOREIGN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT ON STOCK INDICES IN INDIADR. S. NIRMALA & ARUNA.G

1

# TREND AND PROSPECT OF PRIVATE EQUITY FUND IN ASIA$PACIFIC COUNTRIES: A LESSON FROM INDIADR. MANAS CHAKRABARTI

2"

% CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING IN THE CONTET OF RECENT CHANGES IN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK WITH SPECIALREFERENCE TO INDIA

DR. BHASKAR JYOTI BORA & TILAK CH DAS

32

BRAND CHOICE DECISION OF INDIAN URBAN FAMILY

SRI. JAYA PRAKASH RATH, SRI. RAJESH KUMAR SAIN & SRI. ANJAN KUMAR MOHANTY

3

1' FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN INDIAN MULTI BRAND RETAIL TRADE: STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVEPRATIK MAVANI & DR. AMIT R. PANDYA

!2

11 EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS IN CHINA STOCK MARKETSSHIKHA MAHAJAN & MANISHA LUTHRA

!#

12 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SELECTED SECTORS INDE OF BSEKARAN SAGAR & ALPESH GAJERA

51

13 A STUDY OF SERVICE QUALITY PERSPECTIVES AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTIONRAVINARAYANA K.S.

55

1! A STUDY ON COST EFFECTIVE METHOD OF RECRUITMENT AT KGISLPARVATA RAJ PRABHU

5

15 STRUCTURED EMOTIONAL CAREER COUNSELLING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENTDR. SEHBA HUSAIN

""

1" CUSTOMER PERCEPTION OF SERVICE QUALITY DIMENSIONS IN INDIAN BANKING INDUSTRY

AISHWARYA GOYAL

#5

1# A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ORGANI(ED AND UN$ORGANI(ED FOOD RETAILING IN AHMEDABAD CITY OF GUJARATSANJIV KUMAR

%1

1% MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS A PREREQUISITE GROWTH STRATEGY FOR INDIAN HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OFRANBAY$DAIICHI ALLIANCE

PREETI SINGH

%5

1 IFRS: NEED OF PRESENT SCENARIONEERU RANI

%#

2' THE ROLE OF LEADERSHIP IN THE GROWTH OF YOUTH OWNED ENTREPRISES IN KENYA: A CASE OF NYERI COUNTYSAMWEL MACHARIA CHEGE & CATHERINE KAIMENYI

3

21 INFLUENCE OF UNIVERSITY INCENTIVES FOR CAREER DEVELOPMENT ON LECTURERS) PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN KENYADR. JANET N.MANYASI

#

22 ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOUR AND BUSINESS SUCCESS OF SMALL SCALE ORGANIC VEGETABLE FARMERSM.G.P.P. MAHINDARATHNE

1'2

23 DOES ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAMS INFLUENCE BUSINESS PERFORMANCE* AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE NIGERIA SME+DR. AKANDE O.O 1'#

2! VOLATILITY OF INDIAN STOCK MARKET WITH REFERENCE TO CHANGE IN FII POLICY 2''1AMEE I. DAVE & PRIYA D. PARIKH

112

25 INFLUENCE OF EMPOWERMENT ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: A CASE OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS) IN KAKAMEGA CENTRALDISTRICT, KENYA

ROBERT K.W. EGESSA & SHITSESWA E. AYUB

11#

2" THE IMPACT OF HRM PRACTICES IN INDIAN SUGAR INDUSTRYDR. S. SURESH & K. V. MURALIDHARA RAO

121

2# RADIO LISTENERS AND ADVERTISEMENTS: AN EPLORATORY APPROACHIRFAN MUMTAZ K.S.

12"

2% THE IMPACT OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT ON BANKS AND WORKERS PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDYRAKESH, C & SHABARISHA, N

12%

2 EAMINING THE RELATION OF WORK ETHICS TO JOB SATISFACTION AND WORK STRESS IN EMPLOYEES OF PAYAME NOOR UNIVERSITY

CENTRAL ORGANI(ATIONBAHAREH SHAHRIARI

131

3' FDI AND MULTI BRAND TRADE IN INDIAASHISH KUMAR

13"

REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK 13


3/12



http4//i5rc3or&in/

iii

CHIEF PATRONCHIEF PATRONCHIEF PATRONCHIEF PATRONPROF- K- K- AGGARWAL

,h!ir3!n% M!l!viy! '!tion!l nstitute of 6echnolo&y% J!ipur(An in!i!"!# $% N!i$n' I)$*!n+# & %"'' %"n-#- Mini!* $% H"n R#$"*+# D#/#'$)#n!, G$/#*n#n! $% In-i0

,h!ncellor% 7 R M!n&!l!3 8niversity% #ur&!on

,h!ncellor% 9in&!y!:s 8niversity% $!rid!b!d

$ounder ;ice-,h!ncellor (


4/12



http4//i5rc3or&in/

iv

PROF- ANIL K- SAINI,h!irperson (,R,)% #uru#obind"in&h P 8niversity% Delhi

DR- SAMBHAVNA$!culty% 6M% Delhi

DR- MOHENDER KUMAR GUPTAAssoci!te Professor% PJ9'#overn3ent,olle&e% $!rid!b!d

DR- SHIVAKUMAR DEENEAsst Professor% Dept of ,o33erce% "chool of Business "tudies% ,entr!l 8niversity of 7!rn!t!!% #ulb!r&!

ASSOCIATE EDITORSASSOCIATE EDITORSASSOCIATE EDITORSASSOCIATE EDITORSPROF- NAWAB ALI KHAN

Dep!rt3ent of ,o33erce% Ali&!rh Musli3 8niversity% Ali&!rh% 8P

PROF- ABHAY BANSAL.e!d% Dep!rt3ent of nfor3!tion 6echnolo&y% A3ity "chool of ?n&ineerin& 6echnolo&y% A3ity

8niversity% 'oid!

PROF- V- SELVAM""9% ;6 8niversity% ;ellore

PROF- N- SUNDARAM;68niversity% ;ellore

DR- PARDEEP AHLAWATAssoci!te Professor% nstitute of M!n!&e3ent "tudies Rese!rch% M!h!rshiD!y!n!nd8niversity% Roht!

DR- S- TABASSUM SULTANAAssoci!te Professor% Dep!rt3ent of Business M!n!&e3ent% M!trusri nstitute of P# "tudies% .yder!b!d

TECHNICAL ADVISORTECHNICAL ADVISORTECHNICAL ADVISORTECHNICAL ADVISORAMITA

$!culty% #overn3ent M "% Moh!li

FINANCIAL ADVISORSFINANCIAL ADVISORSFINANCIAL ADVISORSFINANCIAL ADVISORSDICKIN GOYAL

Advoc!te 6!@ Adviser% P!nchul!

NEENA

nvest3ent ,onsult!nt% ,h!3b!&h!t% "ol!n% .i3!ch!l Pr!desh

LEGAL ADVISORSLEGAL ADVISORSLEGAL ADVISORSLEGAL ADVISORSJITENDER S- CHAHAL

Advoc!te% Pun5!b .!ry!n! .i&h ,ourt% ,h!ndi&!rh 86

CHANDER BHUSHAN SHARMAAdvoc!te ,onsult!nt% District ,ourts% 2!3un!n!&!r !t J!&!dhri

SUPERINTENDENTSUPERINTENDENTSUPERINTENDENTSUPERINTENDENTSURENDER KUMAR POONIA


5/12



http4//i5rc3or&in/

v

CALL FOR MANUSCRIPTSCALL FOR MANUSCRIPTSCALL FOR MANUSCRIPTSCALL FOR MANUSCRIPTSCe invite unpublished novel% ori&in!l% e3piric!l !nd hi&h u!lity rese!rch wor pert!inin& to recent develop3ents pr!ctices in the !re!s of

,o3puter "cience Applic!tionsE ,o33erceE BusinessE $in!nceE M!retin&E .u3!n Resource M!n!&e3entE #ener!l M!n!&e3entE B!nin&E

?cono3icsE 6ouris3 Ad3inistr!tion M!n!&e3entE ?duc!tionE 9!wE 9ibr!ry nfor3!tion "cienceE Defence "tr!te&ic "tudiesE ?lectronic

"cienceE ,orpor!te #overn!nceE ndustri!l Rel!tionsE !nd e3er&in& p!r!di&3s in !llied sub5ects lie Accountin&E Accountin& nfor3!tion

"yste3sE Accountin& 6heory Pr!cticeE Auditin&E Beh!vior!l Accountin&E Beh!vior!l ?cono3icsE ,orpor!te $in!nceE ,ost Accountin&E

?cono3etricsE ?cono3ic Develop3entE ?cono3ic .istoryE $in!nci!l nstitutions M!retsE $in!nci!l "ervicesE $isc!l PolicyE #overn3ent 'on

Profit Accountin

&E ndustri!l Or&!ni!tionE ntern!tion!l ?cono3ics 6r!deE ntern!tion!l $in!nceE M!cro ?cono3icsE Micro ?cono3icsE Rur!l

?cono3icsE ,o-oper!tionE De3o&r!phy4 Develop3ent Pl!nnin&E Develop3ent "tudiesE Applied ?cono3icsE Develop3ent ?cono3icsE Business

?cono3icsE Monet!ry PolicyE Public Policy ?cono3icsE Re!l ?st!teE Re&ion!l ?cono3icsE Politic!l "cienceE ,ontinuin& ?duc!tionE 9!bour

Celf!reE PhilosophyE Psycholo&yE "ociolo&yE 6!@ Accountin&E Advertisin& Pro3otion M!n!&e3entE M!n!&e3ent nfor3!tion "yste3s (M")E

Business 9!wE Public Responsibility ?thicsE ,o33unic!tionE Direct M!retin&E ?-,o33erceE #lob!l BusinessE .e!lth ,!re Ad3inistr!tionE

9!bour Rel!tions .u3!n Resource M!n!&e3entE M!retin& Rese!rchE M!retin& 6heory Applic!tionsE 'on-Profit Or&!ni!tionsE Office

Ad3inistr!tion/M!n!&e3entE Oper!tions Rese!rch/"t!tisticsE Or&!ni!tion!l Beh!vior 6heoryE Or&!ni!tion!l Develop3entE

Production/Oper!tionsE ntern!tion!l Rel!tionsE .u3!n Ri&hts DutiesE Public Ad3inistr!tionE Popul!tion "tudiesE Purch!sin&/M!teri!ls

M!n!&e3entE Ret!ilin&E "!les/"ellin&E "ervicesE "3!ll Business ?ntrepreneurshipE "tr!te&ic M!n!&e3ent PolicyE 6echnolo&y/nnov!tionE

6ouris3 .ospit!lityE 6r!nsport!tion DistributionE Al&orith3sE Artifici!l ntelli&enceE ,o3pilers 6r!nsl!tionE ,o3puter Aided Desi&n (,AD)E

,o3puter Aided M!nuf!cturin&E ,o3puter #r!phicsE ,o3puter Or&!ni!tion ArchitectureE D!t!b!se "tructures "yste3sE Discrete

"tructuresE nternetE M!n!&e3ent nfor3!tion "yste3sE Modelin& "i3ul!tionE 'eur!l "yste3s/'eur!l 'etworsE 'u3eric!l

An!lysis/"cientific ,o3putin&E Ob5ect Oriented Pro&r!33in&E Oper!tin& "yste3sE Pro&r!33in& 9!n&u!&esE RoboticsE "y3bolic $or3!l 9o&icE

Ceb Desi&n !nd e3er&in& p!r!di&3s in !llied sub5ects

Anybody c!n sub3it the +./0 .of unpublished novelE ori&in!lE e3piric!l !nd hi&h u!lity 4+647 8.49/6;=; +


6/12



http4//i5rc3or&in/

vi

1

KEYWORDS:Abstr!ct 3ust be followed by ! list of eywords% sub5ect to the 3!@i3u3 of five 6hese should be !rr!n&ed in !lph!betic order sep!r!ted by

co33!s !nd full stops !t the end

I MANUSCRIPT:M!nuscript 3ust be in BRITISH ENLISHprep!red on ! st!nd!rd A+ sie !ORTR"IT SETTIN !"!ER t 3ust be prep!red on ! sin&le sp!ce !ndsin&le colu3n with 3!r&in set for top% botto3% left !nd ri&ht t should be typed in = point ,!libri $ont with p!&e nu3bers !t the botto3 !nd centre of every

p!&e t should be free fro3 &r!33!tic!l% spellin& !nd punctu!tion errors !nd 3ust be thorou&hly edited

K HEADINGS:All the he!din&s should be in ! * point ,!libri $ont 6hese 3ust be bold-f!ced% !li&ned left !nd fully c!pit!lised 9e!ve ! bl!n line before e!chhe!din&

= SUB$HEADINGS:All the sub-he!din&s should be in ! = point ,!libri $ont 6hese 3ust be bold-f!ced% !li&ned left !nd fully c!pit!lised

+ /=/= REFERENCES:6he list of !ll references should be !lph!betic!lly !rr!n&ed 6he !uthor (s) should 3ention only the !ctu!lly utilised references in the prep!r!tion

of 3!nuscript !nd they !re supposed to follow H6464 S0> ./ R/4;=; 6he !uthor (s) !re supposed to follow the references !s per the followin&4

All wors cited in the te@t (includin& sources for t!bles !nd fi&ures) should be listed !lph!betic!lly 8se (-) for one editor% !nd (-+ for 3ultiple editors

Chen listin& two or 3ore wors by one !uthor% use --- (>*@@)% such !s !fter 7ohl (=K-0*0

JOURNAL AND OTHER ARTICLES

"che3enner% RC% .uber% J, !nd ,oo% R9 (*)4 L,usto3er ;!lue4 A ,o3p!r!tive "tudy of Rur!l !nd 8rb!n ,usto3ers%L 6hesis% 7urushetr! 8niversity% 7urushetr!ONLINE RESOURCES

Alw!ys indic!te the d!te th!t the source w!s !ccessed% !s online resources !re freuently upd!ted or re3ovedWEBSITES

#!r&% Bh!vet (>*)4 6ow!rds ! 'ew '!tur!l #!s Policy% Politic!l Ceely% ;iewed on J!nu!ry *% >*> http4//epwin/user/view!bstr!ct5sp


7/12



http4//i5rc3or&in/

1

PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SELECTED SECTORS INDE OF BSE

K"R"N S""R

"SST. !ROFESSOR

DE!"RTMENT OF M.B.".

SHRI SUNSHINE ROU! OF INSTITUTIONS

R"%KOT

"L!ESH "%ER"

"SST. !ROFESSOR

DE!"RTMENT OF M.B.".

SHRI SUNSHINE ROU! OF INSTITUTIONS

R"%KOT

ABSTRACTT1# $-#' $% #/'"!in2 )$*!%$'i$3 )#*%$*n+# *# #- $n !4$ %+!$* /i5., R#!"*n n- Ri6, 41i+1 *# "i!'# %$* 1$*! !#* n- 7$* 1$*!+$in2 i

!1! !1## $-#' #/'"!# -i%%#*#n! !)# $% in/#!#n! +$)ni# !1## # %+!$*. T1i !"- "22#! $-#' %$* #/'"!i$n $% '$n28!#* )$*!%$'i$3

)#*%$*n+# ++$"n!in2 +$n!in2#n+ "'!i +*i!#*i %$* #+1 %i#'- $% in/#!#n! +$)n +'i%i+!i$n. In !1i *##*+1 ))#* 4# *# 2$in2 !$ #/'"!# !1#

)#*%$*n+# $% -i%%#*#n! BSE #+!$* in-#9 "+1 BSE BANKE:, BSE CG, BSE FMCG, #!+ 4i!1 %i/# -i%%#*#n! )$*!%$'i$ #/'"!i$n #"*#. i.#. S1*)# #"*#,

T*#n$* #"*#, J#n#n #"*#, F #"*# n- M;

#"*#.

KEYWORDSPortfolio Perfor3!nce ?v!lu!tion% "h!rpe% 6reynor% Jensen% $!3!% M "u!re

INTRODUCTIONtudies on portfolio perfor3!nce ev!lu!tion be&!n in the * to 0/>/>*>) $or M!ret ris

return !s well !s vol!tility B"? "?'"? will be used

TOOLS & TECHNIQUES

$or !n!lyin& the u!rterly closin& price of selected indices tools lie 3e!n% st!nd!rd devi!tion !nd bet! h!ve been used for findin& ris !nd return

> $or 3e!surin& the perfor3!nce of selected indices theories !nd for3ul!s of "h!rpe% 6reynor% Jensen% $!3! !nd M>

3e!sures h!ve been !pplied on ris !ndreturn of selected indices

0 $or co3p!rin& the nde@ perfor3!nce of different B"? ndices% One C!y A'O;A test h!s been !pplied


8/12



http4//i5rc3or&in/

1>

DATA ANALYSIS & INTEPRETATIONTABLE 1 QUARTERLY RETURN OF SELECTED INDE

R=+9 /4 460 ./ 40


9/12



http4//i5rc3or&in/

10

S. +*> K=K ->

-"ep * K 1KK -**+ > + -*K> +=I *>< *I=

-Dec * -I10 -+< 10I -+I1 -K*I -+I< I0+ -I1I IK< 0=1 **>

>-M!r * +0

>-Jun * -+> >>K ->1= -I*> -*1 -*IK -0> -I>K

>-"ep * -0+ -*1+ ->K >0+ **1 -*=+ -I -00 -1KK -I1I +0< 0>< -1+I

>-Dec * = 11+ -10 -+= *K0 -K= -I< +01 +>

ANOVA: S=;> F60.4

.o 6here is no si&nific!nce difference in the 3e!n f!3! portfolio 3e!sure in between different inde@

.! 6here is si&nific!nce difference in the 3e!n f!3! portfolio 3e!sure in between different inde@

S.0*>II =I*>+W=07=; G4.K1 >

>-Jun * - -*I -*I ->1> -++ -0>K +=

>-"ep * -1= -*01 ->< KI **0 -*K= -1+< -=+ -1* -+=+ I0> +1K -1+K

>-Dec * +K 0*0 -0> 1+K 0== -+ -+0> *+I -IKK -1 I>I I= -0>0

ANOVA: S=;> F60.4

.o 6here is no si&nific!nce difference in the 3e!n M su!re (M>) portfolio 3e!sure in between different inde@

.! 6here is si&nific!nce difference in the 3e!n M su!re (M>) portfolio 3e!sure in between different inde@

S. =KKK01I 0K0++I< =I*>+

W=07=; G4.0==0 01*0I0

T.06> 00 *0

I;044060=.;: 6here is enou&h evidence to re5ect null hypothesis which indic!tes th!t there is si&nific!nce difference in the 3e!n M "u!re (M>) portfolio

3e!sure in between different inde@% which shows th!t so3e inde@ perfor3s well co3p!red to others

FINDINGS6he findin&s of the study !re e@pressed in the followin& t!ble4

TABLE$#: COMBINED RANKING OF SELECTED SECTOR INDE BY USING ALL PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE MEASURE

I; S764 T4;.4 J;+; FAMA MM A46 R6;9=;

R6>0 I I I I I I I

B6;9 1 1 + + 1 +I 1

BSE CG = = K K K K+ K

BSE CD 0 0 0 > 0 >= >

BSE A 0 + 0+ +

BSE O=>& G6+ * < = < < < =

BSE PSU > *

BSE M06> 0 > 0 > > >+ >

BSE IT < + * * = *> *

BSE P.84 + 0 > 0 0 0 0

BSE FMCG

BSE HC > > 1 1 > 0> 0

BSE T9 < = *


10/12



http4//i5rc3or&in/

1+

> 6he top three perfor3in& inde@ !lon& with B"? $M,# is B"? ,D B"? .,% while botto3 three perfor3in& inde@ !re B"? P"8% B"? Met!l B"? Power

considerin& !ll five portfolio perfor3!nce 3e!sures

CONCLUSIONBefore the evolution of portfolio perfor3!nce 3e!sure% invest3ent h!s been done on the b!sis of historic!l return !nd ris of !ny p!rticul!r security !nd it h!s

been !lso ev!lu!ted on the b!sis of !ctu!l return !nd ris th!t this p!rticul!r security or portfolio h!s &ener!ted 'ow ! d!y five different 3e!sure h!s been

there for ev!lu!tin& portfolio perfor3!nce n this study perfor3!nce of different B"? inde@ h!s been ev!lu!ted by usin& the different portfolio perfor3!nce

3e!sures $ro3 th!t ev!lu!tion we co3e to now th!t for ! selected ti3e period B"? $M,# is the best perfor3in& nde@ while B"? power is the worst

perfor3in& inde@ which c!n be revel fro3 r!nin& &iven in 6!ble no K

REFERENCES I;=6; J. ./ F=;6; 2''#, titled Perfor3!nce ?v!lu!tion !nd $uture Prospects of Mutu!l $und ndustry in ndi! published in ndi!n Journ!l of

$in!nce4 ;olu3e T 'u3ber > TJune-July >**K

> R6764=2'',in his rese!rch p!per titled ?v!lu!tion of lon& ter3 portfolio: perfor3!nce published in Bi


11/12



http4//i5rc3or&in/

11

RE&UEST FOR FEEDB"CK

D64 R64+

At the very outset% ntern!tion!l Journ!l of Rese!rch in ,o33erce !nd M!n!&e3ent (JR,M) !cnowled&es

!ppreci!tes your efforts in showin& interest in our present issue under your ind perus!l

would lie to reuest you tosupply your critic!l co33ents !nd su&&estions !bout the 3!teri!l published

in this issue !s well !s on the 5ourn!l !s ! whole% on our ?-3!il ie =;/.=46=>-. for further

i3prove3ents in the interest of rese!rch

f youh!ve !ny ueries ple!se feel free to cont!ct us on our ?-3!il =;/.=46=>-.

!3 sure th!t your feedb!c !nd deliber!tions would 3!e future issues better ! result of our 5oint

effort

9ooin& forw!rd !n !ppropri!te consider!tion

Cith sincere re&!rds

6h!nin& you profoundly

A6=6>> .


12/12



http4//i5rc3or&in/

Portfolio Performance Evaluation of Selected Sector Index of BSE

Documents

Transcript of Portfolio Performance Evaluation of Selected Sector Index of BSE