Popper v. Kuhn

12
thOmas kuHn 1922 – 1996 karL poPper 1902 – 1994 vS faLsifiCation! ParadigMs!

description

A short lesson on Popper's and Kuhn's views on scientific inquiry. Most of the session was spent untangling some common misconceptions students have of Kuhn's views.

Transcript of Popper v. Kuhn

Page 1: Popper v. Kuhn

thOmas kuHn 1922 – 1996

karL poPper 1902 – 1994

vS

faLsifiCation! ParadigMs!

Page 2: Popper v. Kuhn

PhySiCist BecAme IntErEstEd in HisTory and PhiLoSopHy of SciEnce

ThoMas S. Kuhn (1922 – 1996)

AddEd a PosTsCriPt in the 2nd EdiTion(1969)

it’s TouGh With EinStein AroUnD.

the StrUcTure of SciEnTifIc RevOlUtiOns (1962)

Page 3: Popper v. Kuhn

NoRmAl ScIeNcE

ReVoLuTiOnArY ScIeNcE

Page 4: Popper v. Kuhn

NoRmAl ScIeNcE

ShaRed MetApHysIcs

ShaRed ValUes Sha

Red TheOr

EtiCal

BelIe

fs

ExeMpLars

ExeMpLars ExeMp

Lars

ExeMpLars

ShaRed InsTrUmeNts and TecHnIquEs

Page 5: Popper v. Kuhn

NoRmAl ScIeNcE

ShaRed MetApHysIcs ShaRed ValUes

ShaRed

TheOr

EtiCal

BelIe

fs ExeMpLars

ExeMpLars ExeMp

Lars

ExeMpLars

ShaRed InsTrUmeNts and TecHnIquEs and Just to ConFuse you, i

SomEtImes Call the ExeMpLars of Good SciEnce �ParAdIgms�too.

ComMiTmeNt to the DisCiPliNary MatRix is a pre-ReqUiSite for SucCeSsfUl NorMal SciEnce.

TheRe is TheReFore a TenSion BetWeen the DesIre for InnOvAtiOn and the Need to “ThiNk WitHin the box”.

TheSe Form a DisCiPliNary MatRiX, or ParAdigm*.

Page 6: Popper v. Kuhn

NoRmAl ScIeNcE

ShaRed MetApHysIcs

ShaRed ValUes Sha

Red TheOr

EtiCal

BelIe

fs

not TesTed

AnoMaLous ResUlts are TolErAted

RevOlUtiOns are not SouGht for ExcEpt

UndEr ExtReme CirCuMstAnces

ExeMpLars

ExeMpLars ExeMp

Lars

ExeMpLars

ShaRed InsTrUmeNts and TecHnIquEs

Page 7: Popper v. Kuhn

NoRmAl ScIeNcE

ShaRed MetApHysIcs

ShaRed ValUes Sha

Red TheOr

EtiCal

BelIe

fs

Anomaly Anomaly

Anomaly Anomaly Anomaly Anomaly Anomaly Anomaly Anomaly Anomaly

Anomaly Anomaly Anomaly

Anomaly

ExeMpLars

ExeMpLars ExeMp

Lars

ExeMpLars

ShaRed InsTrUmeNts and TecHnIquEs

Page 8: Popper v. Kuhn

ShaRed MetApHysIcs

CrIsIs!

ExeMpLars ExeMpLars

Page 9: Popper v. Kuhn

A ScIeNtIfIc ReVoLuTiOn Is …

not CumUlAtiVe.!

not GovErned by RulEs.

UltImAteLy SetTled by ComPaRing the PuzZle-SolVing PowEr of the

ComPeTing IdeAs.

CumUlAtiVe.!

GovErned by RulEs of LogIc.

UltImAteLy SetTled by ComPaRing the ComPeTing HypOtHesEs’ AbiLity

to ResIst AttEmpts to FalSify Them.

Page 10: Popper v. Kuhn

ScIeNtIfIc PrOgReSs

the RevOlUtiOnary SeaRch for a RepLaCemEnt ParAdigm is DriVen by the FaiLure of the ExiSting ParAdigm to

SolVe CerTain AnoMaLies.

the RepLaCemEnt ParAdigm SolVes the MajOrity of ThoSe PuzZles and RetAin Much of the ProBlem-SolVing PowEr of its PreDeCesSoR.

HowEver, we CanNot InfEr From the IncRease in ProBlem-SolVing PowEr ProVided by the new ParAdigm That we are

now CloSer TotHeTruTh, BecAuse ParAdIgms are IncOmMenSuRabLe* With one AnoTher.

Page 11: Popper v. Kuhn

ScIeNtIfIc PrOgReSs

* thE sciEnce GuideD by onE ParadIgm iS incOmmenSurabLe witH

The sCiencE devElopeD undEr a DiffeRent ParadiGm, in tHat tHere iS

No coMmon MeasuRe of the DiffeRent TheoriEs.

the RevOlUtiOnary SeaRch for a RepLaCemEnt ParAdigm is DriVen by the FaiLure of the ExiSting ParAdigm to

SolVe CerTain AnoMaLies.

the RepLaCemEnt ParAdigm SolVes the MajOrity of ThoSe PuzZles and RetAin Much of the ProBlem-SolVing PowEr of its PreDeCesSoR.

HowEver, we CanNot InfEr From the IncRease in ProBlem-SolVing PowEr ProVided by the new ParAdigm That we are

now CloSer TotHeTruTh, BecAuse ParAdIgms are IncOmMenSuRabLe* With one AnoTher.

Page 12: Popper v. Kuhn

anomaly

anomaly

anomaly

anomaly

anomaly

anomaly

anomaly

anomaly