Poll Results NV 2-22-2015
9
State 604 100.0 100.0 100.0 Nevada Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 2002. How likely are you to vote in national elections? 411 68.1 68.1 68.1 115 19.0 19.0 87.0 78 13.0 13.0 100.0 604 100.0 100.0 Definitely Very likely Somewhat likely Total Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Party 230 38.0 38.0 38.0 169 28.0 28.0 66.0 205 34.0 34.0 100.0 604 100.0 100.0 Democratic Republican Independent Total Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 1. President Obama has announced his intention to take executive action that would allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to live and work legally in the United States. He plans to take this action without authorization from Congress. Do you support or oppose the president acting on his own to allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. and grant them work authorization? 106 17.5 17.5 17.5 112 18.6 18.6 36.1 92 15.3 15.3 51.4 263 43.6 43.6 95.0 30 5.0 5.0 100.0 604 100.0 100.0 Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Don't know Total Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Nevada 2/20/15 - 2/22/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations, but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative Zogby Analytics Page 1 2/22/2015
-
Upload
federation-for-american-immigration-reform -
Category
Documents
-
view
907 -
download
1
description
Poll Results Nevada 2-22-2015
Transcript of Poll Results NV 2-22-2015
-
State
604 100.0 100.0 100.0NevadaValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
2002. How likely are you to vote in national elections?
411 68.1 68.1 68.1
115 19.0 19.0 87.0
78 13.0 13.0 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Definitely
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Party
230 38.0 38.0 38.0
169 28.0 28.0 66.0
205 34.0 34.0 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Democratic
Republican
Independent
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
1. President Obama has announced his intention to take executive action that would allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to liveand work legally in the United States. He plans to take this action without authorization from Congress. Do you support or opposethe president acting on his own to allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. and grant them work authorization?
106 17.5 17.5 17.5
112 18.6 18.6 36.1
92 15.3 15.3 51.4
263 43.6 43.6 95.0
30 5.0 5.0 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Strongly support
Somewhat support
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Don't know
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Nevada2/20/15 - 2/22/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 1 2/22/2015
-
2. The House of Representatives recently passed a bill that fully funds the Department of Homeland Security throughthe remainder of this year, but prohibits the use of that money to carry out the president's plan to shield millions of illegal
aliens from deportation and grant them work authorization. Do you support or oppose passage of a bill that fully fundsthe Department of Homeland Security but prohibits the use of those funds to carry out the president's immigration plan?
212 35.0 35.0 35.0
126 20.8 20.8 55.9
106 17.5 17.5 73.4
103 17.0 17.0 90.5
58 9.5 9.5 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Strongly support
Somewhat support
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Don't know
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
3. Last year, Sen. Dean Heller opposed the president taking executive action on immigration, saying 'What I don't agree with is theuse of the executive order nor do I agree with the Administration bypassing Congress.' However, this month Senator Heller votedagainst legislation that would bar the use of federal funds to implement the president's plan to shield millions of illegal aliens from
deportation and grant them work authorization. Which of the following statements best reflects your views on Sen. Heller's stance?
255 42.2 42.2 42.2
210 34.8 34.8 77.0
139 23.0 23.0 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Sen. Heller should supportlegislation to defund the president'sexecutive action on immigration.Sen. Heller should opposelegislation to defund the president'sexecutive action on immigration.Don't know.
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
4. President Obama has said that if Congress sends him a Department of Homeland Security bill thatprohibits him from using funds to implement his executive action on immigration, he will veto the bill. In
your opinion, would the president be justified in vetoing the Homeland Security funding bill because it limitshis ability to carry out his plan to shield illegal aliens from deportation and grant them work authorization?
214 35.4 35.4 35.4
324 53.6 53.6 89.1
66 10.9 10.9 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Yes, the president would bejustified in vetoing the HomelandSecurity funding bill.No, the president would not bejustified in vetoing the HomelandSecurity funding bill.Don't know.
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Nevada2/20/15 - 2/22/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 2 2/22/2015
-
5. If the House and Senate cannot come to an agreement on legislation to fund the Department of Homeland Security,there is a possibility that about 15 percent of the department's operations could be shutdown. The other 85 percent ofDHS personnel are considered essential workers and would remain on the job even if a spending bill is not approved.
In your opinion, who would be most responsible if a partial shutdown of DHS operations were to occur?
160 26.6 26.6 26.6
204 33.8 33.8 60.4
239 39.6 39.6 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
House Republicans who insiston including provisionspreventing the president fromcarrying out his executive actionon immigration.Senate Democrats andPresident Obama who insist onallowing Homeland Securityfunds to be used to carry out thepresident's executive action onimmigration.Both would be equallyresponsible.Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
6. Supporters of the president's executive action on immigration argue that it would make the country more secure because it willhelp us identify the people who are currently living here illegally. Opponents of the president's plan argue that it would make thecountry less secure because it would divert resources and manpower away from the department's primary mission of securingthe homeland. In your opinion, what effect would the president's executive action on immigration have on homeland security?
145 24.0 24.0 24.0
231 38.2 38.2 62.2
157 26.0 26.0 88.2
71 11.8 11.8 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
It would make the countrymore secure.It would make the countryless secure.It would have little or noeffect on homeland security.Don't know.
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Gender
290 48.0 48.0 48.0
314 52.0 52.0 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Male
Female
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Nevada2/20/15 - 2/22/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 3 2/22/2015
-
What is your current employment status?
289 47.9 48.8 48.8
42 7.0 7.1 55.9
12 2.0 2.0 57.9
34 5.7 5.8 63.7
57 9.4 9.5 73.2
159 26.3 26.8 100.0
593 98.2 100.0
11 1.8
604 100.0
Working (full or part time)
Temporarily unemployed andlooking for workTemporarily unemployed and notlooking for workStudent
Stay at home parent/spouse
Retired
Total
Valid
.00Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Household Income
121 20.1 21.7 21.7
70 11.6 12.5 34.2
86 14.2 15.4 49.6
134 22.3 24.1 73.7
75 12.4 13.4 87.1
54 8.9 9.6 96.7
18 3.1 3.3 100.0
558 92.4 100.0
46 7.6
604 100.0
< $25K
$25-35K
$35-50K
$50-75K
$75-100K
$100-150K
$150K+
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Nevada2/20/15 - 2/22/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 4 2/22/2015
-
Age group A
103 17.0 17.0 17.0
217 35.9 36.0 53.0
175 29.0 29.0 82.0
109 18.0 18.0 100.0
603 99.8 100.0
1 .2
604 100.0
18-29
30-49
50-64
65+
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Age group B
62 10.2 10.2 10.2
115 19.1 19.1 29.3
192 31.8 31.8 61.2
179 29.7 29.8 90.9
55 9.0 9.1 100.0
603 99.8 100.0
1 .2
604 100.0
18-24
25-34
35-54
55-69
70+
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Generation
177 29.3 29.3 29.3
131 21.7 21.7 51.1
214 35.5 35.5 86.6
81 13.4 13.4 100.0
603 99.8 100.0
1 .2
604 100.0
First Globals
Nikes
Woodstockers
Privates
Total
Valid
.00Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Nevada2/20/15 - 2/22/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 5 2/22/2015
-
Education
298 49.4 49.9 49.9
300 49.6 50.1 100.0
598 99.0 100.0
6 1.0
604 100.0
No College Degree
College Degree+
Total
Valid
.00Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Race
387 64.0 65.0 65.0
107 17.7 18.0 83.0
54 8.9 9.0 92.0
30 4.9 5.0 97.0
18 3.0 3.0 100.0
595 98.5 100.0
9 1.5
604 100.0
White
Hisp
AfrAmer
Asian
Other
Total
Valid
.00Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Live
360 59.5 60.2 60.2
58 9.6 9.7 69.9
146 24.2 24.5 94.4
34 5.6 5.6 100.0
597 98.9 100.0
7 1.1
604 100.0
Lge City
Sm City
Suburbs
Rural
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Nevada2/20/15 - 2/22/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 6 2/22/2015
-
Ideology Recoded
144 23.9 26.0 26.0
217 35.8 39.0 65.1
194 32.1 34.9 100.0
555 91.8 100.0
49 8.2
604 100.0
Liberal
Moderate
Conservative
Total
Valid
.00Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Religion
145 23.9 23.9 23.9
185 30.6 30.6 54.6
26 4.3 4.3 58.8
249 41.2 41.2 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Catholic
Protestant
Jewish
Other/None
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
BornAgain
90 15.0 48.9 48.9
95 15.7 51.1 100.0
185 30.6 100.0
419 69.4
604 100.0
Yes
No/NS
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Nevada2/20/15 - 2/22/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 7 2/22/2015
-
Union member
66 11.0 11.2 11.2
526 87.0 88.8 100.0
592 98.0 100.0
12 2.0
604 100.0
Yes
No
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Child under 17?
172 28.6 28.9 28.9
424 70.1 71.1 100.0
596 98.7 100.0
8 1.3
604 100.0
Yes
No
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Residency
152 25.1 25.5 25.5
318 52.7 53.5 78.9
125 20.8 21.1 100.0
595 98.6 100.0
9 1.4
604 100.0
My city or town
America
The planet earth
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Lost a job due to corporate downsizing within the past year?
79 13.1 13.1 13.1
525 86.9 86.9 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Nevada2/20/15 - 2/22/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 8 2/22/2015
-
Been afraid of losing a job within the next year?
159 26.3 26.3 26.3
445 73.7 73.7 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Worked at a job that pays less than an immediate previous job?
202 33.5 33.5 33.5
402 66.5 66.5 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Gone without food for 24 hours in the past month due to a lack of food or money?
73 12.1 12.1 12.1
531 87.9 87.9 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Veteran/Armed Forces?
168 27.8 27.8 27.8
436 72.2 72.2 100.0
604 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Nevada2/20/15 - 2/22/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 9 2/22/2015
