Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the...

33
East Asia in International Relations MA course, 4 credits (8 ECTS) Fall semester 2014 Tuesdays and Thursdays: 11.00-12.40pm Classroom: TBA Dr. YOUNGMI KIM Department of International Relations and European Studies Office: TBA Office hours: Tuesday 1:30 -3:10pm, Thursday 1:30-3:10pm Ext. 2091 Email: [email protected] Teaching Assistant: TBA Course outline The aim of this course is to introduce students to the international relations of East Asia. The course is divided in two parts. The first provides an overview to the region. An overview of East Asia during the 20 th and early 21 st centuries is provided: Attention is paid to state formation, regime types, democratization, and political culture. The second part covers developments in the international politics of East Asia since the end of the Cold War. Here the interplay between external and regional powers is analyzed, alongside the foreign policies of the main actors in the region. Special attention is also given to trends in Asian regionalism (politics, security, economy). Note: EA in IR is offered jointly with ‘Korea in International Relations’ – a course supported by the Korea Foundation ‘Global E-school in Eurasia’ Project, launched at CEU in 2012. This means that classes held on Tuesdays focus on East Asia, and those on Thursdays zoom in on the Korean Peninsula with a 1

Transcript of Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the...

Page 1: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

East Asia in International Relations

MA course, 4 credits (8 ECTS)Fall semester 2014Tuesdays and Thursdays: 11.00-12.40pm Classroom: TBA

Dr. YOUNGMI KIMDepartment of International Relations and European StudiesOffice: TBAOffice hours: Tuesday 1:30 -3:10pm, Thursday 1:30-3:10pmExt. 2091Email: [email protected]

Teaching Assistant: TBA

Course outlineThe aim of this course is to introduce students to the international relations of East Asia. The course is divided in two parts. The first provides an overview to the region. An overview of East Asia during the 20th and early 21st centuries is provided: Attention is paid to state formation, regime types, democratization, and political culture. The second part covers developments in the international politics of East Asia since the end of the Cold War. Here the interplay between external and regional powers is analyzed, alongside the foreign policies of the main actors in the region. Special attention is also given to trends in Asian regionalism (politics, security, economy).

Note: EA in IR is offered jointly with ‘Korea in International Relations’ – a course supported by the Korea Foundation ‘Global E-school in Eurasia’ Project, launched at CEU in 2012. This means that classes held on Tuesdays focus on East Asia, and those on Thursdays zoom in on the Korean Peninsula with a focus on either the domestic or foreign policy of South and North Korea. The Thursday classes are connected online and in real time, via Bluejean, to other universities members of the KF Global E-School consortium. These include ELTE (Hungary), Paris-Diderot (France), the University of Vienna (Austria), the Middle East Technical University/METU in Ankara (Turkey), the American University of Central Asia/AUCA in Bishkek (Kyrgyzstan), and the Tajik State University of Commerce in Dushanbe (Tajikistan) etc..

AimsThe main aims of this course are the following:

- provide an introduction to the domestic and international politics of East Asia;- provide an overview of the regional policies and bilateral relationships of the

major powers (primarily the United States);- examine regional organizations and the changing nature of regional order; - discuss the main conflictual dynamics in the region (Taiwan, North Korea);

1

Page 2: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

- discuss post-Cold War continuities and changes.Learning outcomesAt the end of the course students should be able to:

- be familiar with the political systems of the main East Asian countries;- explain the linkages between local, regional, and global developments and

their impact on East Asian politics;- analyze the foreign policies of the main East Asian states;- have an understanding of the factors facilitating and hindering regional

cooperation.

Assessment: 10% : Class attendance and presentations10% : Collective lecture note-taking (using Googledocs); group activity including group forum on the e-learning website, Debate20% : 1,000-word book review30% : 1,000-word position paper on the debate topic or Electoral Notes30% : 3,000-word essay

*Seminar presentation: Presenters are required to submit their presentation outline to the instructor and the TA 3 days before the class. *Collective lecture note-taking: It should be uploaded on the e-learning website (and sent to the TA) every week before the next lecture starts.*Book review due: Tuesday 14 October Midnight (books on Asian politics or books listed in the course syllabus)*Position Paper or Electoral Notes: Thursday 13 November Midnight Position paper on the debate topic (Should North Korea be engaged or contained?) or Electoral notes in EA*Essay deadline: Thursday 11 December Midnight

Recommended course textbooks

Huang, X. (2009) Politics in Pacific Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Joseph, W (2010) Politics in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Acharya, A. and Goh, E. eds. (2008) Reassessing Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific: Competition, Congruence, and Transformation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Beeson, M. (2007) Regionalism & Globalization in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Katzenstein, P.J. (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Background readingMellisen, J and Lee, S.J. eds. (2011). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia. New York: Palgrave and Macmillan. Aggarwal, V. and Lee, S. (2011) Trade Policy in the Asia-Pacific: The Role of Ideas, Interests, and Domestic Institutions. London: Springer.Lee, Y. (2011). Militants or Partisans: Labour Unions and Democratic Politics in Korea and Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Callahan, W. (2010) China: The Pessoptimist Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2

Page 3: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Bercovitch, J.  Huang, K.  and Teng, C. eds. (2008).  Conflict Management, Security and Intervention in East Asia: Third-party Mediation and Intervention Between China and Taiwan. Oxon: Routledge.Emmers, R. (2010). Geopolitics and Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia. Oxon: Routledge.Kwak, T. and Joo, S. eds. (2010) Peace Regime Building on the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asian Security Cooperation. Surrey: Ashgate.Schoenbaum, T. ed. (2008) Peace in Northeast Asia: Resolving Japan's Territorial and Maritime Disputes with China, Korea and the Russian Federation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Frost, E. L. (2008). Asia's New Regionalism. London: Lynne Reinner Publisher.Kim, Y. (2011). The Politics of Coalition in Korea: Between Institutions and Culture. London: Routledge.Kim, B and Vogel, E (eds). (2011) The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Shambaugh, D. and M. Yahuda (2008). International Relations of Asia. Plymouth, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Kaup, K. ed. (2007) Understanding Contemporary Asia Pacific. Boulder: Rienner.Shin, G.W and Chang, P. (2011). South Korean Social Movements: From Democracy to Civil Society. London: Routledge.Cha, V. (2012). The Impossible State: North Korea, Past and Future. New York: Harper Collins Publisher.Jang, H.-J. (2008). Bad Samaritans: Rich Nations, Poor Policies and the Threat to the Developing World. London: Random House.Acharya, A. (2009). Whose Ideas Matter?: Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. New York: Cornell University Press.Acharya, A. (2008). Asia Rising: Who is leading? London, World Scientific.Pempel, T. J. ed. (2005) Remapping East Asia: The Construction of a Region. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Shambaugh, D, ed. (2005) Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Sutter, R. G. (2010). Chinese Foreign Relations: Power and Policy since the Cold War. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Snyder, S. (2009). China's Rise and the Two Koreas: Politics, Economics, Security. London: Lynne Reiner Publishers.Li, M. (2009). Soft Power: China's Emerging Strategy in International Politics. Lanham, Lexington Books.Taylor, I. (2010). China's new role in Africa. London, Lynne Reinner Publishers.Yasushi, W. and D. L. McConnell (2008). Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States. New York, M.E. Sharpe Vyas, U. (2010) Soft Power in Japan-China Relations: State, sub-state and non-state relations. London: Routledge.Tong, J. S. W. (2009). Revenge of the Forbidden City: The Suppression of the Falungong in China, 1999-2005.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Dalton, R., Shin, D., and Chu, Y. (eds) (2008). Party Politics in East Asia: Citizens, Elections and Democratic Development. Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publisher. Zhang, Y. (2003). Pacific Asia: The Politics of Development. London: Routledge.Yahuda, M. (2004) The International Politics of the Asia-Pacific. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2nd ed.

3

Page 4: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Ikenberry, G. J. and M. Mastanduno (2003). International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific. New York Columbia University Press.Kim, S.S., ed. (2004) The International Relations of Northeast Asia.  Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Kim, H.-a. (2004) Korea's Development under Park Chung Hee: Rapid industrialization 1961-79. New York: Rountledge Cruzon.Scheiner, E. (2006) Democracy without competition in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Carlson M.(2007). Money Politics in Japan: New Rules, Old Practices. London: Lynne Reiner Publishers.Roberts, T and Hite, A. (2007) The Globalization and Development Reader. Oxford: Blackwell PublishingSassen, S. (1992).The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Bell, D. and Hahm, C. (2003) Confucianism for the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Diamond, L. and Plattner, M. (2009) Democracy: A Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Weekly Schedule

WK Topic Notes

1-1 23 Sept Introduction – Modern history in EA and Korea

1-2 25 Sept State formation and regional order: East Asia in the twentieth century

K, E-school

2-1 30 Sept Forms of government2-2 2 Oct One-party party system and politics: China

/ NKK, E-school

3-1 7 Oct Dominant party system in Japan 3-2 9 Oct Democratization and multi-party system:

South Korea and TaiwanK, E-school

4-1 14 Oct Electoral systems and Social cleavages4-2 16 Oct Political culture: The Confucian legacy K, E-school5-1 21 Oct Do ‘Asian values’ exist? Debate (Double class

with WK 6-1, The US in EA)15th Oct, Book Review Deadline

5-2 23 Oct From the 4 Dragons to the Asian Crisis (and beyond)

K, E-school – Bank Holiday in Hungary

6-1 28 Oct Region-builder or spoiler? The US in East Asia

(Class to be combined with WK 5-1) 21st Oct

6-2 30 Oct Soft power in East Asia K, E-schoolHyung Seok KangKang_Hyungseok@ceu-

4

Page 5: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

budapest.edu7-1 4 Nov READING WEEK No Class7-2 6 Nov No Class8-1 11 Nov The Korean Peninsula – security in East

Asia8-2 13 Nov Should North Korea be engaged or

contained? K, E-school, Debate 13th Nov. Position Paper or Electoral Note Deadline

9-1 18 Nov The Rise of China and the neighbours9-2 20 Nov China and Russia K, E-school, MF

10-1 25 Nov China and Taiwan10-2 27 Nov Global cities in East Asia K, E-school11-1 2 Dec Norms, Culture and Foreign Policy: The

ASEAN Way 11-2 4 Dec Approaches to Comparative Regionalism K, E-school12-1 9 Dec Political and Economic Regionalism12-2 11 Dec Is East Asia a region? Why is there no

‘Asian Union’?Wrap-up session

K, E-school18th Dec. Final paper Deadline

Weekly Readings

Week 1-1 IntroductionWhat is East Asia? Why does it matter?Course Expectations and overview; Assessment and assignments.

Required readingHuang, X. (2009) Politics in Pacific Asia, Ch. 1.Shambaugh, D. and M. Yahuda (2008). International Relations of Asia. Plymouth, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Ch. 1

Additional readingsHaggard, S. (2004) The Balance of Power, Globalization, and Democracy: International Relations Theory in Northeast Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(1), 1-38.Kim, S. S. (2004) Regionalization and Regionalism in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(1), 39-67.Yahuda, M. (2004) The International Politics of the Asia-Pacific (2nd ed). London: RoutledgeCurzon, Ch.1, 2.

Week 1-2 State formation – East Asia in the 20th century

5

Page 6: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

The lecture provides some background to East Asian politics and society by focusing especially on issues of state-formation in the 20th century and the Cold War period. The lecture also assesses some of the changes brought to the region by the end of the Cold War, and pays special attention to the evolving role of Japan, the rise of China, the changing dynamics between the United States and its allies in East Asia, as well as change in the domestic arenas.

Required readingsShambaugh, D. and M. Yahuda (2008). International Relations of Asia. Plymouth, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Ch. 2 Samuel KimBeeson, M. (2007) Regionalism & Globalization in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, Ch. 3.

Additional readingsBeeson, M. (2007) Regionalism & Globalization in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, Ch. 1, 2.Yahuda, M. (2004). Ch.1, 2.Cohen, W (2000) ‘The Foreign Impact on East Asia’, in Merle Goldman and Gordon, A. eds. (2000)(eds), Historical Perspectives on Contemporary East Asia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1-22.Snyder, J (1991) Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. New York: Columbia UP, 112-152.Alagappa, M. (1998) ‘International politics in Asia: The historical context’, in: Alagappa, M. Asian security practice : material and ideational influences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 65-114.Christensen, T. (2006) Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and U.S. Policy toward East Asia. International Security, 31(1), 81-126.

Berger, T (2000), Set for Stability? Prospects for Conflict and Cooperation in East Asia. Review of International Studies, 26(3), 405-428.Friedberg, A. (1994) Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia. International Security, 18(3), 5-33.Christensen, T (1999) China, The US-Japan Alliance, And The Security Dilemma In East Asia. International Security, 23(4), 49-80. Kang, D (2003) Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks. International Security, 27(4), 57-85. Amitav Acharya (2004), Will Asia’s Past Be Its Future? International Security, 28(3), 149-164. Ross, R.S. (1999) The Geography of Peace: East Asia in the Twenty-first Century. International Security, 23(4), 81-118.Yahuda, M. (2004) Ch.1.Zhang, Y. (2003) Pacific Asia: The Politics of Development. London: Routledge, Ch.1, 2.

Week 2-1 Forms of governmentThe lecture provides differences in the design of government systems and their impact

on the policy process. It also compares systems of parliamentary and presidential

government. It focuses on the regime survival: minority government/ divided

6

Page 7: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

government and compares and contrast forms of centralised and decentralised systems

of government.

Required readings

Mainwaring, S. (1993). "Presidentialism, Multipartism and Democracy: The Difficult

Combination." Comparative Political Studies 26(2): 198-228.

Kim, Y. (2008). "Explaining the minority coalition government and governability in

South Korea: A review essay." Korea Observer 39(1): 59-84.

Additional readingsStepan, A. and C. Skach (1993). "Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic

Consolidation: Parliamentarism versus Presidentialism." World Politics 46(1): 1-22.

Elgie, R. (2004). "Semi-Presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting

Explanations." Political Studies Review 2(3): 314-330

Cheibub, J. A. (2002). "Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations, and The

Survival of Presidential Democracies." Comparative Political Studies 35(3): 284-312.

Linz, J. J. (1990). "The Perils of Presidentialism." Journal of Democracy 1(1): 51-69.

Elgie, R. (2001). Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Mainwaring, S. (1993). "Presidentialism, Multipartism and Democracy: The Difficult

Combination." Comparative Political Studies 26(2): 198-228.

Elgie, R. (2007) Varieties of semi-presidentialism and their impact on nascent

democracies. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 3(2): 53-71.

Linz, J.J. (1990) The virtues of parliamentarism. Journal of Democracy, 1(4): 84-91.

Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in

Thirty-six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Week 2-2 One-party system – China / North KoreaThe lecture highlights the central features of two important one-party systems in East Asia, and explores how they have evolved over time.

Required readingLin, G. (2004) Leadership Transition, Intra-Party Democracy, and Institution Building in China. Asian Survey, 44(2), 255-275.

Additional readingsBeja, J.P. (2009) The Massacre’s Long Shadow. Journal of Democracy, 20(3), 5-16.

7

Page 8: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Hsieh, J. F.S. (2003) Democratizing China. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 38(4/5), 377-391.Zhao, S. (1998) Three Scenarios. Journal of Democracy, 9(1), 54-59.Oksenberg, Michel (1998) Confronting a Classic Dilemma. Journal of Democracy, 9(1), 27-34.Harding, H (1998) The Halting Advance of Pluralism. Journal of Democracy, 9(1), 11-17.Dittmer, L. (2000) Informal Politics in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Ch. 1, 5, 6, 10.Huang, X. (2009), Ch. 2, 3.Diamond, L. and Myers, R. H. (2001) Elections and Democracy in Greater China. Oxford, Oxford University Press, Ch.5.

Week 3-1 One-party dominant system in Japan Democracy has come in different moments in time in East Asia, from an early start in post-war Japan to a more recent process in Korea and Taiwan. The emergence of a one-party dominant rule in Japan (under the LDP) is examined.

Required readingsScheiner, E. (2006) Democracy without competition in Japan. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Ch.2.

Additional readingsLaver, M. and J. Kato (2001) Dynamics Approaches to Government Formation and the Genetic Instability of Decisive Structures in Japan. Electoral Studies, 20(4), 509-527.Kato, J. And Y. Kannon (2008) Coalition Governments, Party Switching, andthe Rise and Decline of Parties: Changing Japanese Party Politics since 1993. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 9 (3) 341–365.Inoguchi, T. (2008) Parliamentary Opposition under (Post-)One-Party Rule: Japan. Journal of Legislative Studies, 14(1), 113-132.

Week 3-2 Democratization in East Asia – South Korea and Taiwan The lecture discusses the end of authoritarian rule in South Korea and Taiwan and looks at the social and political forces behind democratization, as well as the hurdles on the way to democracy.

Required readingsKim, Y. (2008). Intra-party politics and minority coalition government in South Korea. Japanese Journal of Political Science 9(3): 367-398.Lee, Y. (2011). Militants or Partisans: Labour Unions and Democratic Politics in Korea and Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press, Ch.1: 1-11.

Additional readingsKim, Y. (2011). The Politics of Colaition in Korea: Between Institutions and Culture. London: Routledge.

8

Page 9: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Kim, B and Vogel, E (eds). (2011) The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Kim, H and Sorensen, C (eds). (2011) Reassessing the Park Chung Hee Era 1961-1979. Seattle: University of Washington PressLee, Y. (2009). Divergent Outcomes of Labour Reform Politics in Democratized Korea and Taiwan. Studies in Comparative International Development 44:47-70Yu, C.-h. (2005). The Evolving Party System in Taiwan, 1995.2004. Journal of Asian and African Studies 40(1/2):105-123.Kim, H.-a. (2004) Korea's Development under Park Chung Hee: Rapid industrialization 1961-79. New York: Rountledge Cruzon.Bouissou, J.-M. (2001) Party factions and the politics of coalition: Japanese politics under the "system of 1955. Electoral Studies, 20(4), 581-602.Yap, F. and Y. Kim (2008). Pathologies or Progress? Evaluating the effects of Divided Government and Party Volatility. Japanese Journal of Political Science 9(3): 261-268.Croissant, A. (2004) From transition to defective democracy: mapping Asian democratization. Democratization, 11(5).Huang, X. (2009), Ch. 9 (‘Modernization and Democracy’). Tong, J. S. W. (2009). Revenge of the Forbidden City: The Suppression of the Falungong in China, 1999-2005.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Shin, D. and H. Shyu (1997) Political Ambivalence in South Korea and Taiwan. Journal of Democracy, 8(3), 109-124.Stockton, H. (2001) Political Parties, Party Systems, and Democracy in East Asia: Lessons From Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 94-119.Im, H. (2004) Faltering Democratic Consolidation in South Korea: Democracy at the End of the 'Three Kims' Era. Democratization, 11(5), 179-198.Shi, F. and Y. Cai (2006) Disaggregating the State: Networks and Collective Resistance in Shanghai. China Quarterly, 314-332.Pei, Minxin (1995) Creeping Democratization in China. Journal of Democracy, 6(4), 65-79.Kim, S. (2003) Korea's Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Week 4-1 Electoral systems and Social cleavagesThis session provides studies on the party representation, constitutional engineering

and voting behaviour and social cleavages. It looks at the voting rules and political

behaviour and proportional representation and raises issues such as what variables

seem relevant to explain the choices for a proportional representation or a plurality

system.

Required readingNorris, P. 1997. "Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian and Mixed

Systems." International Political Science Review 18(3): 297-312.

Rokkan, S.1970/2009. Citizens, Elections, Parties – Approaches to the Comparative

Study of the Processes of Development. Chapter 3 (Nation-Building, Cleavage

Formation and the Structuring of Mass Politics).

9

Page 10: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Additional readings

Kim, Y. 2014. The 2012 Parliamentary and Presidential Elections in South Korea.

Electoral Studies, 34(2), 326-330

Boix, C. 1999. “Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in

Advanced Democracies.”The American Political Science Review , 93(3): 609-624.

LeDuc, L., Niemi R. and P. Norris. 2010. “Introduction: Building and Sustaining

Democracy.” In Comparing Democracies 3 London: Sage.

Lijphart A. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma“, The

American Political Science Review , 91(1): 1-14.

Mozaffar, S., J. R. Scarritt, et al. 2003. "Electoral Institutions, Ethnopolitical

Cleavages and Party Systems in Africa's Emerging Democracies." American Political

Science Review 97(3): 379-390.

Benoit, Kenneth. 2007. “Electoral Laws as Political Consequences: Explaining

Origins and Change of Electoral Institutions.” Annual Review of Political Science 10:

363-390.

Benoit, Kenneth and Jacqueline Hayden. 2004. “Institutional Change and Persistence:

The Evolution of Poland’s Electoral System, 1989-2001. Journal of Politics 66(2):

396-427.

Iversen, Torben and David Soskice. 2006. “Electoral Systems and the Politics of

Coalitions - Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others”. American

Political Science Review 100(2): 165-181.

Karp, Jeffrey A. and Susan A. Banducci. 2008. “Political Efficacy and Participation in

Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour.”

British Journal of Political Science 38: 311-334.

Lijphart, Arend. Electoral systems and party systems. A study of twenty-seven

democracies 1945-1990, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994.

Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral engineering. Voting rules and political behavior,

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Ch 2, 3.

Hoffman, A.L. 2005. Political parties, electoral systems and democracy: A cross-

national analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 44, 231-242.

Christensen, R. V. and P. E. Johnson. 1995. "Toward a Context-Rich Analysis of

Electoral Systems: The Japanese Example." American Journal of Political Science

39(3): 575-598.

10

Page 11: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Kriesi, H. 2010. ‘Restructuration of Partisan Politics and the Emergence of a New

Cleavage Based on Values’, in: West European Politics 33(3): 673-685.

Bartolini and Mair 1990/2007: Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability – The

Stabilization of European Electorates 1885-1985, Chapters 2-4.

Achterberg, P. 2006, ‘Class Voting in the New Political Culture: Economic, Cultural

and Environmental Voting in 20 Western Countries’, in: International Sociology

21(2):237-261.

Ufen, A. 2012. “Party Systems, Critical Junctures, and Cleavages in Southeast Asia.”

Asian Survey, 52(3): 441-464.

Norris, Pippa. 2008. Driving Democracy: Do Power‐sharing Institutions Work?

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Albright, J. (2010), ‘The Multidimensional Nature of Party Competition’, in: Party

Politics 16(6): 57-72.

Week 4-2 Political CultureIs there a distinctive Asian political culture? If so, what does it look like and how does it matter in political, social, and economic relationships?

Required readingChan, S. C. (2011). Cultural Governance and Place-Making in Taiwan and China. The China Quarterly, 206: 372-390.Ham, Chae-bong. (2004) The Ironies of Confucianism. Journal of Democracy, 15(3), 93-107.

Additional readingsKim, Y. (2012) ‘Confucianism and coalition politics: Is Korean political behaviour irrational?’, Journal of Northeast Asian History, 9(2): 5-32.Blondel, J. and T. Inoguchi (2002) Political Cultures Do Matter: Citizens and Politics in Western Europe and East and Southeast Asia. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 3(2), 151-171.Hsieh, J.F.S. (2000) East Asian Culture and Democratic Transition, With Special Reference to the Case of Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 35(1), 29-42.Dittmer, L. (2000) Informal Politics in East Asia, Introduction Ch1, 3, Conclusion.Hahm, Chae-bong (2006) Confucianism and the concept of liberty. Asia-Europe Journal, 4, 477-489. Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000) Trust and Institutional Dynamics in Japan: The Construction of Generalized Particularistic Trust. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 1(1), 53-72.Inoguchi, T. (2000) Social Capital in Japan. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 1(1), 73-112.Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust: The Social Virtue and the Creation of Prosperity. London: Penguin Books, 3-145.

11

Page 12: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Week 5-1 Debate – Do Asian values exist?

Required readingZakaria, F. (1994) Culture Is Destiny; A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 109-126.Kim Dae-jung (1994) Is Culture Destiny? The Myth of Asia's Anti-Democratic Values. Foreign Affairs, November/December.

Additional readingsBeeson, M. (2007) Ch.4 (‘Nationalism, Domestic politics and Asian values’).Dittmer, L. (2000) Ch 4.Dalton, R. J. and Ong, N.N. T. (2005) Authority Orientations and Democratic Attitudes: A Test of the Asian Values' Hypothesis. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 6(2): 211-231.Lee, C. Y. (2003) Do traditional values still exist in modern Chinese society? The case of Singapore and China. Asia Europe Journal, 1: 43-59.

Week 5-2 Political Economy – The Four Dragons, the Asian Crisis and beyondThe model of the developmental state features prominently in the lecture, which provides an overview of the rise of capitalism in East Asia.

Required readingBlankenburg, S. and Palma J. G. (2009) Introduction: the global financial crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4): 531-538.Crotty, J. (2009) Structural causes of the global financial crisis: a critical assessment of the ‘new financial architecture’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 563–580Khan, S., Islam, F., Ahmed, S. (2005) The Asian Crisis: An Economic Analysis of the Causes. Journal of Developing Areas, 39(1), 169-190.

Additional readingsJang, H.-J. (2008). Bad Samaritans: Rich Nations, Poor Policies and the Threat to the Developing World. London: Random House. Ch.1.King, M.R. (2001) Who triggered the Asian financial crisis? Review of International Political Economy, 8(3), 438-466.Kim, H.-a. (2004) Korea's Development under Park Chung Hee: Rapid industrialization 1961-79. New York: Rountledge Cruzon.Bowles, P. (2002) Asia's post-crisis regionalism: bringing the state back in, keeping the (United) States out. Review of International Political Economy, 9(2), 244-270.Zhang, Y. (2003) Pacific Asia: The Politics of Development. London: Routledge, Ch.3, 32-46.Gills, B.K. (2000) The crisis of post war East Asian capitalism: American power, democracy and the vicissitudes of globalization. Review of International Studies, 26(3), 381-403.Huang, X. (2009), Ch. 5 (The state and the economy).Dalton, R. J. and D. C. Shin (2006) Citizens, Democracy, and Markets Around the Pacific Rim. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch 1.

12

Page 13: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Kwon, H.J. (2005) Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia. Development and Change, 36(3), 477-497.Peng, D. (2000) The Changing Nature of East Asia as an Economic Region. Pacific Affairs, 73(2), 171-191. Islam, I. and A. Chowdhury (2001) The Political Economy of East Asia: Post-Crisis Debates. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wenli, Z. (2001) International Political Economy from a Chinese Angle. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(26), 45-54.Hughes, C.W. (2000) Japanese policy and the East Asian currency crisis: abject defeat or quiet victory? Review of International Political Economy, 7(2), 219-253.Mo, S., Haggard, J. (2000) The political economy of the Korean financial crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 7(2), 192-218.Bevacqua, R. (1998) Whither the Japanese model? The Asian economic crisis and the continuation of Cold War politics in the Pacific Rim. Review of International Political Economy, 5(3), 410-423.Kim, Byung-Kook and Vogel, Ezra (2011) eds. The Park Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press Ch1.Amsden, Alice H. (1989) Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Armstrong, C.K. (2002) ed. Korean Society: Civil Society, Democracy and the State. London: RoutledgeEckert, Carter J. (1991) Offspring of Empire: The Koch’ang Kims and the Colonial Origins of Korean Capitalism 1876-1945. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Kim, Sunhyuk (2000) The Politics of Modernization in Korea: The Role of Civil Society. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Koo, Hagen (2001) Korean Workers: The Culture and Politics of Class Formation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.World Bank (1993) The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Woo-Cumings, Meredith (1999) ed. The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press

Week 6 -1 Region-builder or spoiler? The US in East AsiaThe lecture examines the role of the United States in the region, especially in shaping regional dynamics.

Required readingBeeson, M. (2009) Hegemonic Transition in East Asia? The dynamics of Chinese and American Power. Review of International Studies, 35, 95-112.

Additional readingsBeeson, M. (2007), Ch. 8 (‘East Asian regionalism’).Katzenstein, P.J. (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, esp. Ch. 6 (‘Linking Regions and Imperium’). Inoguchi, T. and P. Bacon (2005). Empire, Hierarchy, and hegemony: American grand strategy and the construction of order in the Asia-Pacific. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 5(2), 117-132.

13

Page 14: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Ness, P. V. (2002) Hegemony, not anarchy: why China and Japan are not balancing US unipolar power. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2(1), 131-150.Yahuda, M. (2004), Ch. 8 (‘Era of American Pre-eminence’), and Ch. 9 (‘United States’)Inoguchi, T. and P. Bacon (2001) The study of international relations in Japan: towards a more international discipline. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 1(1), 1-20.Garrett, B. (2006) US-China Relations in the Era of Globalisation and Terror: AFramework for Analysis. Journal of Contemporary China, 15(48), 389-415.

Week 6-2 Soft Power in East AsiaWhat is Soft Power? How does China try to exercise it? What are the impacts of Korea wave (Hallyu) or Korean Soft power in the world?

Required readingsYasushi, W. and McConnell, D.L. (eds) (2008) Soft Power Superpowers. London: M.E. Sharpe, Introduction.

Additional readingsLi, M. (2009) Soft Power: China’s Emerging Strategy in International Politics. Lanham: Lexington, Ch.1.Li, M. (2009) Soft Power: China’s Emerging Strategy in International Politics. Lanham: Lexington.CSIS (2009) Chinese Soft Power and Its Implications for the United States. Competition and Cooperation in the Developing World. Washington: CSIS. Vyas, U. (2010) Soft Power in Japan-China Relations: State, sub-state and non-state relations. London: Routledge.

Week 7 READING WEEK

Week 8-1 The Korean Peninsula - security in East AsiaThe lecture seeks to go beyond the stereotypical image of a ‘reclusive country with the nookes’ and provides some background to North Korea.

Required readingMitchell B. Reiss (2006) A Nuclear-armed North Korea: Accepting the ‘Unacceptable’. Survival, 48(4), 97-109.International Crisis Group (2007) After the North Korea Nuclear Breakthrough: Compliance or Confrontation? Policy Briefing No. 62.

Additional readingsSmith, Hazel (2000) Bad, Mad, Sad or Rational Actor? Why the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs 76(3), 593-617.Jae-Ho Chung (2001) South Korea Between Eagle and Dragon: Perceptual Ambivalence and Strategic Dilemma. Asian Survey, 41(5), 777-796.

14

Page 15: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Noland, M. and Bark, T. (2003) The Strategic Importance of US-Korean Economic Relations. NBR Special Report, No.4. Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research. Shambaugh, David (2003) China and the Korean Peninsula: Playing for the Long Term. Washington Quarterly, 26(2), 43-56.Bruce Cumings (1997) Korea’s Place in the Sun. New York: Norton, 237-264.Victor Cha (2000) Abandonment, Entrapment, and Neoclassical Realism in Asia: The United States, Japan, and Korea. International Studies Quarterly, 44(2) 261-291.Ming, Liu (2003) China and the North Korean Crisis: Facing Test and Transition. Pacific Affairs, 76(3), 347-373.Michael R. Chambers (2005) Dealing with a Truculent Ally: A Comparative Perspective on China’s Handling of North Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 5, 35-75.Ann Wu (2005) What China Whispers to North Korea. Washington Quarterly, 28(2), 35-48.

Week 8-2 Should North Korea be engaged or contained? - DebateRequired readingsSnyder et al.(2010) U.S. Policy Toward the Korean Peninsula. Independent Task Force Report No. 64. Council on Foreign Relations.Bates Gill (2011) China’s North Korea Policy: Assessing Interests and Influences. Special Report. United States Institute of Peace. Cha, Victor and Kang, David (2004) Can North Korea be Engaged? An Exchange between Victor Cha and David Kang. Survival, 46(2), 89-108

Additional readingsCha, Victor D. (2002) Hawk Engagement and Preventive Defense on the Korean Peninsula. International Security, 27(1), 40-78.Ming, Liu (2003) China and the North Korean Crisis: Facing Test and Transition. Pacific Affairs, 76(3), 347-373.Michael R. Chambers (2005) Dealing with a Truculent Ally: A Comparative Perspective on China’s Handling of North Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 5, 35-75.International Crisis Group (2007) After the North Korea Nuclear Breakthrough: Compliance or Confrontation? Policy Briefing No. 62.Mitchell B. Reiss (2006) A Nuclear-armed North Korea: Accepting the ‘Unacceptable’. Survival, 48(4), 97-109.Smith, Hazel (2000) Bad, Mad, Sad or Rational Actor? Why the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs 76(3), 593-617.Jae-Ho Chung (2001) South Korea Between Eagle and Dragon: Perceptual Ambivalence and Strategic Dilemma. Asian Survey, 41(5), 777-796.Noland, M. and Bark, T. (2003) The Strategic Importance of US-Korean Economic Relations. NBR Special Report, No.4. Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research. Shambaugh, David (2003) China and the Korean Peninsula: Playing for the Long Term. Washington Quarterly, 26(2), 43-56.Bruce Cumings (1997) Korea’s Place in the Sun. New York: Norton, 237-264.Victor Cha (2000) Abandonment, Entrapment, and Neoclassical Realism in Asia: The United States, Japan, and Korea. International Studies Quarterly, 44(2) 261-291.

15

Page 16: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Ming, Liu (2003) China and the North Korean Crisis: Facing Test and Transition. Pacific Affairs, 76(3), 347-373.Michael R. Chambers (2005) Dealing with a Truculent Ally: A Comparative Perspective on China’s Handling of North Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 5, 35-75.Ann Wu (2005) What China Whispers to North Korea. Washington Quarterly, 28(2), 35-48.

Week 9-1 The Rise of China and the neighboursThe lecture examines the factors that have made the rise of China possible during the late 20th and 21st century.

Required readingsCallahan, W.A. (2008) Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony? International Studies Review, 10(4), 749-761.Friedberg, A. (2012) Bucking Beijing. Foreign Affairs, 91 (5), 48-58.

Additional readingsRingmar, Erik (2012) “Performing International Systems: Two East-Asian Alternatives to the Westphalian Order,” International Organization, 66(1), 1-25.http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8479231Speech by Zoellick, Robert B (2005) “responsible stakeholder” (Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility? Remarks to National Committee on U.S.-China Relations September 21.Nathan, A and Schobell, A (2012) How China Sees America. Foreign Affairs 91 (5), 32-47.Christensen, T. J. (2006) Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and US Policy towards East Asia. International Security, 31(1), 81-126.Kerr, D. (2007) Has China Abandoned self-reliance? Review of International Political Economy, 14(1), 77-104.Callahan, W. A. (2005) How to understand China: the dangers and opportunities of being a rising power. Review of International Studies, 31(4), 701–714.Lampton, D. (2007) The Faces of Chinese Power” Foreign Affairs 86(1), 115-27.Ness, P. V. (2002) Hegemony, not anarchy: why China and Japan are not balancing US unipolar power. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2, 131-150.Yang, P. (2006) Doubly Dualistic Dilemma: US strategies towards China and Taiwan. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 6, 209-225.Roy, D. (1994) Dangerous Dragon or Paper Tiger? Hegemon on the Horizon? China's Threat to East Asian Security. International Security, 19(1), 149-168. Cable, V. and Ferdinand, P. (1994) China: Enter the Giant China as an Economic Giant: Threat or Opportunity? International Affairs, 70(2), 243-261. Xuetong, Y. (2001) The Rise of China in Chinese Eyes. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(26), 33-39.Osius, T. (2001) Discussion of 'The Rise of China in Chinese Eyes'. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(26), 41-44.Tammen, R. L. (2006) The Impact of Asia on World Politics: China and India Options for the United States. International Studies Review, 8, 563-580.Yahuda, M. (2004) Ch 6 (‘China and the Asia-Pacific’), Ch.10 (‘China’).

16

Page 17: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Roy, D. (1996) The “China Threat” Issue: Major Arguments. Asian Survey, 36(8) 758-771. Ianchovichina, E. and W. Martin (2004) Impact of China’s Accession to the World Trade Organization. World Bank Economic Review, 18(1), 3-27.

Week 9-2 Russia and ChinaThe lecture examines the interplay between Russia and China in the Central and East Asian regions.

Required readingKuchins, A. (2007) Russia and China: The Ambivalent Embrace. Current History, 107(702), 321-327.Fumagalli, M. (2012) ‘South Korea’s Engagement in Central Asia from the End of the Cold War to the New Asia Initiative’, Journal of Northeast Asian History, 9(2): 69-97.

Additional readingLo, B. (2006), Russia and China: Common interests, contrasting perceptions. CLSA Asian Geopolitics Report, Shanghai, May, 1-31.Torbakov, I. (2007) The West, Russia, and China in Central Asia: What Kind of Game is being played in the region? Transition Studies Review, 14(1), 152-162.Shlapentokh, D. (2007) China in the Russian mind today: Ambivalence and Defeatism. Europe-Asia Studies, 59(1), 1-21.Lo, B. (2004) The Long Sunset of Strategic Partnership. International Affairs, 80(2), 295-309.Lo, B. (2005) Pacific Russia and Asia: An edgy engagement. CLSA Asian Geopolitics Report, Shanghai, September.

Week 10-1 China and TaiwanThe lecture focuses on the conditions that led to the emergence of the two Chinas, and the recent developments. Will they re-unify?

Required readingZhao, Q. (2005) Beijing’s Dilemma with Taiwan: War or Peace? Pacific Review 18(2): 217-42.

Additional readingsRowan, J. (2005) The US-Japan Security Alliance, ASEAN, and the South China Sea Dispute. Asian Survey, 45(3), 414-36.Dittmer, L. (2006) Taiwan as a Factor in China’s Quest for NationalIdentity. Journal of Contemporary China, 15(49), 671-86.Chu,Y. (2003) Power Transition and the Making of Beijing's Policytowards Taiwan. China Quarterly, 176, 960-980.Yang, P. (2006) Doubly Dualistic Dilemma: US strategies towards China and Taiwan. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 6, 209-225.Yahuda, M. (2004) Ch.6, 10.

17

Page 18: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Wang, T. Y. (2000) One China, One Taiwan: An Analysis of the Democratic Progressive Party's China Policy. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 35(1), 159-182.

Week 10-2 Global Cities in East Asia This session provides an introduction to global urban studies, focusing on cities in East Asia. It begins with questions about the nature of global cities and reviews the main approaches to studying cities and urbanization in Asia.

Required readingSassen, S. (2010). “A Savage Sorting of Winners and Losers:Contemporary Versions of Primitive Accumulation.” Globalizations7 (1/2): 23-50.Lee, K., Wong, H and Law, K. (2007). “Social Polarisation and Poverty in the Global City : The Case of Hong Kong” China Report 2007 43 (1): 1-30

Additional readingsPizarro, R. E., L. Wei, et al. (2003). “Agencies of Globalization and Third World Urban Form: A Review.” Journal of Planning Literature18(2): 111-130.Sassen, S. (2008).“Re-assembling the urban.” Urban Geography29 (2): 113-126.Pucher, J., Z.-r.Peng, et al. (2007). “Urban Transport Trends and Policies in China and India: Impacts of Rapid Economic Growth.” Transport Reviews27(4): 379-410.Cartier, C. 2002. Transnational urbanism in the reform-era Chinese city: landscapes from Shenzhen. Urban Studies (39)9: 1513-1532.Roberts, T and Hite, A. (2007) The Globalization and Development Reader. Oxford: Blackwell PublishingSassen, S. (1992).The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Sassen, S. (2005). “The Global City: Introducing a Concept.” The British Journal of World Affairs 6(2): 27-43.Dick, H.W., and Rimmer, P.J. 1998. ‘Beyond the Third World city: The new urban geography of South-east Asia’, Urban Studies, 35(12): 2303-2321.Keil, R. and K. Olds (2001).“Review Symposium.”Urban Affairs Review 37(1): 119-157. Hamnett, C. (1994). “Social Polarisation in Global Cities: Theory and Evidence.” Urban Studies31(3): 401-424.Olds, K. 2001. Globalization and Urban Change: Capital, Culture and Pacific Rim Mega-Projects, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Wu, C. T.. 2000. Diaspora Capital and Asia Pacific Urban Development in G. Bridge and S.e Watson. eds. A Companion to the City. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Yan, Y. 2000. Of Hamburger and Social Space: Consuming McDonald’s in Beijing. In D. Davis, ed. The Consumer Revolution in Urban China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Neuwirth, Robert. 2006. Shadow Cities: A Billion Squatters, A New Urban World. London, New York: Routledge. Nairobi: The Squatter Control pp. 67-99.Brysona, J. and W. Wyckoff (2010). "Rural gentrification and nature in the Old and New Wests." Journal of Cultural Geography 27(1): 53-75.Watt, P. (2009). "Housing Stock Transfers, Regeneration and State-Led Gentrification in London." Urban Policy and Research 27(3): 229-242.

18

Page 19: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Week 11-1 Norms, culture and foreign policy: The ASEAN wayBuilding on some of the points made in the previous lecture, here the focus is on how culture and norms shape foreign policy and the emergence of regional organizations.

Required readingAcharya, A. (2004) How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239-75.

Additional readingsEmmerson, D. K. (2005) Security, Community, and Democracy in Southeast Asia: Analyzing ASEAN. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 6(2), 165-185.Acharya, A. and Tan, S. S. (2006). Betwixt balance and community: America, ASEAN, and the security of Southeast Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 6, 37-59.Solingen, E. (2005) ASEAN cooperation: the legacy of the economic crisis. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 5, 1-29.Nabers, D. (2003) The social construction of international institutions: the case of ASEAN + 3. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 3, 113-136.Ashizawa, K. (2003) Japan's approach toward Asian regional security: from 'hub-and-spoke' bilateralism to 'multi-tiered'. Pacific Review, 16(3), 361-382.Menon, J. (2000) The Evolving ASEAN Free Trade Area: Widening and Deepening.Asian Development Review, 18(1), 49-72.Dokken, K. (2001) Environment, security and regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: is environmental security a useful concept. Pacific Review, 14(4), 2001, 509-530.Webber, D. (2001) Two funerals and a wedding? The ups and downs of regionalism in East Asia and Asia-Pacific after the Asian crisis. Pacific Review, 14(3), 339-372.

Week 11-2 Approaches to Comparative Regionalism

Required readingsFawn, R. (2009). "Regions and their study: where from, what for and where to?" Review of International Studies35: 5-34.

Additional readingsFawcett, L. (2004). "Exploring regional domains: a comparative history of regionalism."International Affairs80(3): 429-446.Sbragia, A. (2008). "Review Article: Comparative Regionalism: What might it be?" Journal of Common Market Studies46(s1): 29-49.Kubicek, P. (2009) ‘The Commonwealth of Independent States: an example of failed regionalism?’ in Fawn Ed., Globalising the Regional, Regionalising the Global Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.AcharyaA. and Johnston, A.Eds. (2007) Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective   Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Introduction and Conclusion.Pempel, T. J. (2005). Remapping East Asia: The Construction of a Region. New York, Cornell University Press, Ch.1-2.

19

Page 20: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Mark Beeson (2005) “Rethinking regionalism: Europe and East Asia in Comparative historical perspective”. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), pp. 969-985.Walter Mattli (1999), The Logic of Regional Integration. Europe and Beyond, Cambridge: CUP, pp. 41-67.Monty G. Marshall (1999) Third World War: System, Process, and Conflict Dynamics Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Ch.6 Andrew Wyatt-Walter, ’Regionalism, Globalization, andWorld Economic Order’, in:L. Fawcett and A. Hurrell (1995, eds.) Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order, Oxford: OUP.

Week 12-1 Political and Economic regionalismThe lecture examines the development of regional dynamics in the economic and political realm in East Asia.

Required readingsBreslin, S. (2010).Comparative theory, China, and the future of East Asian regionalism. Review of International Studies36: 709-729.

Additional readingsInoguchi, T. and P. Bacon (2005). Empire, Hierarchy, and hegemony: American grand strategy and the construction of order in the Asia-Pacific. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 5(2), 117-132.Gomez-Mera, L. (2008). “How ‘new’ is the ‘new Regionalism’ in the Americas? The case of MERCOSUR.” Journal of International Relations and Development11(3):279-308Libman, A. (2007) Regionalisation and Regionalism in the Post-Soviet Space: Current Status and Implications for Institutional Development Alexander Libman Europe-Asia Studies, 59(3): 401-430.Donald J. Puchala, ‘The Integration Theorists and the Study of International  Relations’, International Organization, 55: 3,(2001): 553-88.Amitav Acharya, ‘Regional Worlds in a Post-Hegemonic Era’, SPIRIT Working Papers, No.1 (Science Po, 2009). Available at:http://spirit.sciencespobordeaux.fr/Cahiers%20de%20SPIRIT/Cahiers%20de%20SPIRIT_1_Acharya.pdfAmitav Acharya, Whose Ideas Matter?  Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism (Cornell University Press, 2009), Chapters 1-2.Beeson, M. (2007). Regionalism & Globalization in East Asia. New York, Palgrave Macmillan. Ch.3-4S. Lebedev, ‘The CIS, an Area of Effective Cooperation’, International Affairs (Moscow), 3, (2009):41-46.Andrew Hurrell, the Regional Dimension in International Relations Theory, in Mary Farrell, ed.,  Global Politics of Regionalism,(Pluto Press, 2005): 38-53.Fawcett, L. and A. Hurrell (2000). Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Ch.3-5Antje Wiener and ThomasDiez (2004). European Regional Integration Theory Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ch. 1-4.Gamble, A. and A. Payne (1996). Regionalism and World Order. Hampshire, Palgrave. Ch. 6, 7

20

Page 21: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Dokken, K. (2001). "Environment, Security and regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: is environmental security a useful concept?" The Pacific Review 14(4): 509-530.Ness, P. V. (2002). "Hegemony, not anarchy: why China and Japan are not balancing US unipolar power." International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 2: 131-150.Katzenstein, P. J. (2000). "Regionalism and Asia." New Political Economy 5(3): 353-368.Jan Zielonka (2006), Europe as Empire, The Nature of the Enlarged European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 164-191. Dent, C. (2008) The Asian Development Bank and Developmental Regionalism in East Asia. Third World Quarterly, 29(4), 767-786.Dieter, H. (2003) Exploring alternative theories of economic regionalism: from trade to finance in Asian co-operation? Review of International Political Economy, 10(3), 430-454.Katzenstein, P.J. (2000) Regionalism and Asia. New Political Economy, 5(3), 353-368.Munakata, N. (2006) ‘Has Politics caught up with Markets? In search of East Asian Economic Regionalism’, in P.J. Katzenstein (ed) Beyond Japan. The Dynamics of East Asian Regionalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Beeson, M. (2007) Ch. 7 (‘East Asia and the Global Economy’), and Ch. 8 (‘East Asian regionalism’). Zhang, Y. (2003). Pacific Asia: The Politics of Development. London: Routledge, Ch.3, 4.Katzenstein, P.J. (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Wong, J. (2004) The Adaptive Developmental State in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(3), 345-362.Rüland, J. (2001) ‘The Evolution of APEC’, In: Ravenhill, John, APEC and the construction of Pacific Rim regionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90-133. Ravenhill, J. (2000) APEC adrift: implications for economic regionalism in Asia and the Pacific. Pacific Review, 13(2), 319-333Krauss, E. (2000) Japan, the US and the emergence of multilateralism in Asia.Pacific Review, 13(3), 473-494Underhill, G. and Zhang, X. (2005) The changing state–market condominium in East Asia: rethinking the political underpinnings of development. New Political Economy, 10(1), 1-24.Beeson, M. (2005) Rethinking regionalism: Europe and East Asia in comparative historical perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), 969-985.Breslin, S. and Hook, G. (2002) ‘Introduction: the political economy of microregionalism and world order’, in Breslin, S., and Hook, G. (eds) Microregionalism and world order. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1-22.Beeson, M. (2002) Southeast Asia and the politics of vulnerability. Third World Quarterly, 23(3), 549-564.

Week 12-2 Is East Asia a region? Why is there no ‘Asia Union’? / Wrap-upWhat keeps East Asia together? What constitutes a region? These are some of the questions that lead the discussion in this session. The lecture sets Asian regionalism in a broader comparative perspective, and also asks why no equivalent of European Union has developed.

21

Page 22: Politics of East Asia › sites › courses.ceu.hu › files › att…  · Web viewWhy the Securitization Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea. International Affairs

Required readingBeeson, M. (2007) Regionalism & Globalization in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Ch. 1 (Conceptualising East Asia)

Additional readingsKim, S. S. (2004). Regionalization and Regionalism in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies 4(1), 39-67.Katzenstein, P.J. (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Hemmer, C. and Katzenstein, P. (2002) Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism. International Organization 56(3), 575-607.Acharya, A (2008), ‘Regional Institutions and Security in the Asia-Pacific: Evolution, Adaptation, and Prospects for Transformation’ in Amitav Acharya and Evelyn Goh eds., Reassessing Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific: Competition, Congruence, and Transformation. Cambridge: MIT Press, 19-40.Ravenhill, J. (2007), ‘Asia’s New Economic Institutions’, in Vinod K. Aggarwal and Koo, M. G. (eds.) Asia’s New Institutional Architecture: Evolving Structures for Managing Trade, Financial and Security Relations. Girona: Springer, 35-58.Huang, X. (2009) Ch. 10 (‘Globalization, regionalism and the myth of the Asian century’)Beeson, M. (2007) Regionalism & Globalization in East Asia. New York: Palgrave. Ch 8 (‘East Asian Futures’).Kim, Y. (1997) Asian-style Democracy: A Critique from East Asia. Asian Survey 37(12), 1119-1134.Berger, T. (2000) Set for stability? Prospects for conflict and co-operation in East Asia. Review of International Studies, 26(3), 405-428.Katzenstein, P. (2000) Regionalism and Asia. New Political Economy, 5(3), 353-368.

22