Political Participation
description
Transcript of Political Participation
![Page 1: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Political Participation
Why Do People Vote? Who Votes?Do We Care?
![Page 2: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Homework Due Thursday, BEGINNING of Class 3-1, 6-6
3-4 for extra credit (worth 20 points)
http://elections.gmu.edu/Voter_Turnout_2004.htm
![Page 3: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Pre-1990s Scholarship Two camps
Rational choice theorists “Demographic predictor” researchers
![Page 4: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Anthony Downs, “An Economic Theory of Democracy” (1957) People vote if (P*B) – C > 0
![Page 5: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Good theory, bad prediction “Predicts” that rational people never vote Possible “fix”
Focus on different benefits . . . Psychic benefits, “duty”
Turnout not always sensitive to changes in costs National Voter Registration Act (Motor Voter
Act) of 1993) increased registration but not turnout
BUT what about effects of “same day registration”?
![Page 6: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2004 Total Turnout Rates for Voting Eligible Population Minnesota: 77.21% Wisconsin: 76.19% Maine: 73.37%
![Page 7: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Possible explanations:
Law High Turnout
LawCivic Culture
High Turnout
![Page 8: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Other Camp Demographic people are able to predict
behavior based on characteristics Education SES Race Age
But, they don’t really explain why people vote (description rather than explanation)
![Page 9: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
So . . . One camp is developing
explanations that don’t do a good job of describing actual behavior
The other camp is developing descriptions but not bothering to explain the “why” question
![Page 10: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Civic Voluntarism Model Henry Brady, Sidney Verba and
Kay Lehman Schlozman “Voice and Equality”
![Page 11: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Civic Voluntarism Model Interest/Engagement Mobilization/Recruitment Resources
![Page 12: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Interest/Engagement interest in politics political efficacy (“I can make a
difference, I can participate effectively”) sense of civic duty (“It’s my job as an
American to participate”) group consciousness (“As my
community goes, so go I”) party identification commitment to personal issues
![Page 13: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
What might affect interest/engagement?
![Page 14: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Mobilization/Recruitment Being asked to participate What increases chances of
recruitment?
![Page 15: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Resources Time Money “Civic skills”
Organizational skills Language skills Social adeptness
What increases resources?
![Page 16: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Note . . . Some demographic characteristics
can cut both ways Example: having children
May increase interest/engagement May decrease resources
![Page 17: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Implications for Civic Voluntarism Model “Equal opportunity” not all that equal Importance of social capital and group
membership Importance of “political entrepreneurs” –
politicians and groups that mobilize people
Importance of childhood experiences (family life, education) in adult political behavior
![Page 18: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Barriers to ParticipationFormal Voter Eligibility Registration laws Campaign finance laws Number / quality of polling places
![Page 19: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Barriers to ParticipationInformal Lack of money Lack of time Lack of knowledge Language barriers Lack of “social capital”
![Page 20: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Participation: The Big Picture 2004: 55% of “Voting Age Population”
actually voted (highest since 1968) 2002: 37% of “Voting Age Population”
actually voted Numbers somewhat misleading
“VAP” includes all adults, even those who are ineligible to vote.
In fact, 63.8% of the CITIZEN population voted in 2004
![Page 21: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Turnout Declining over past 50 years Why? Do we care?
![Page 22: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Turnout in 2004 - Race% Adult Citizens
VotingWhite 67.2%
Black 60.0%
Hispanic 47.2%
Asian 44.1%
![Page 23: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Turnout in 2004 - Gender Men (citizens): 62.1% Women (citizens): 65.4%
![Page 24: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Turnout in 2004 -- Age
18 to 24 years 46.7%25 to 34 years 55.7%35 to 44 years 64.0%45 to 54 years 68.7%55 to 64 years 72.8%65 to 74 years 73.3%75 years and over 68.5%
![Page 25: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Demographics of Participation Higher education Higher SES Higher age
Cohort Effect?
![Page 26: Political Participation](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815fd9550346895dcedc08/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Big Picture Again Again, do we care about turnout? What can we do to fix it?