Policy Rules in 4G
Transcript of Policy Rules in 4G
-
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
1/11
september 2010
fercewireless.com
september
Thank you
To our sponsors:
diamond:
plaTinum:
gold:
was a success. AT&T has said that
its low-priced option (200 MB or
$15 per month) allows consumers
to upgrade to an integrated device
with data services without orking
over $30 or more per month.
Nevertheless analysts say that
these steps are minor compared to
the potential business models that
policy control tools may unleash.
As more devices become
wirelessly-enabled and mobile data
consumption intensies, wireless
operators will likely need to nd
new ways to manage and optimize
their networks. Policy control tools
hold that promise but very ew
operators are taking advantage o
these tools today. Why? Because
ater encouraging consumers to
use mobile data with fat-rate data
price plans, wireless operators now
ear they will alienate the consumer
i they dramatically alter this busi-
ness model.
AT&T Mobility and Leap Wireless
boldly stepped into the limelight by
being the rst operators to oer
tiered data price plans in the U.S.
Early indications are that this plan
Putting avalue on
Policy control
From creating sophisticated pricing
packages that let amilies slice
and dice their data usage to using
personal preerences to create
customized services and applica-
tions, policy control tools hold a lot
o potential or the uture.
Although policy control tools are
available or todays 3G networks,
most experts say that policy control
is an aterthought or operators and
thereore we will likely see more
sophisticated use o policy controlwhen carriers deploy their LTE net-
works. What will likely be the rst
iterations o policy control? Some
believe tiered pricing packages
will be the mainstay or awhile
beore we see policy control 2.0
techniques, which include real-time
transactions and the ability to acti-
vate or de-activate new services on
the fy.
Whatever the implementation,
policy control tools will likely be
a hot topic o discussion in the
months and possibly years ahead
as more operators migrate rom
3G to 4G. In this eBook, Fierce-
Wirelesswill take a deep-dive into
all the various aspects o policy
control rom the potential that it
holds to the possible problems and
issues operators may ace.
sue marek
et--Cf/// FcW
$
$$$
$$
$$
$
$$
$$
Policy control:Tools for The
nexT-generaTion neTwork
3Technology,
Experimentation
are Keys to PolicyControls Future
6Customized Services
Lead to New Mobile
Pricing Models*Sponsored Content*
7Pricing Models or
Todays Wireless
Consumer
10Evolution o Policy
Management: rom
Network Controls toService Dierentiation
*Sponsored Content*
11Network Throttling:
A Courtesy or
Hindrance toHeavy Users?
13Do Customized
Services Impede
on CustomerPrivacy?
14Policy: Shaping
the Future
*SponsoredContent*
16Unleashing the
Possibilities o
Next-GenerationPolicy Control
17Does The Net
Neutrality Debate
Help or Hinder theNeed or Policy
Control Tools?
18Operator Use Cases
or the 3 P s: Policy,
Personalizationand Protability
*Sponsored
Content*
2Beyon
Control: D
CustomTargeted
*Spo
Con
http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/ -
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
2/11
fercewireless.com
september 2010 september
Experts say that policy
control tools will oer a lot
o advantages when LTE is
deployed. But or now, very ew
operators are using them.
The need or policy control is
increasingly evident as mobiledata trac builds, but opera-
tors are sidestepping ull-blown
policy control as they try to dis-
cern approaches that are not only
technologically possible but also
politically savvy.
Its no secret that mobile network
congestion is being driven by a
boom in data usage. According to
Forrester Research, some 52
million U.S. mobile subscrib-
ers accessed the Internet rom
their phones at least once a
month during 2009. By 2014,
106 million U.S. mobile cus-
tomers, or 39 percent o the
nations customer base, will be
categorized as regular mobile
internet users. However, although
Forrester predicts U.S. mobile
data access revenues will near an
impressive $20 million in 2014 the
rate o growth will slow as the aver-
age monthly price o a data bundle
decreases rom $17.34 per month
in 2009 to $16.64 in 2014.
Flat-rate unlimited usage plans
or all data types have powered the
adoption o mobile data and the
mobile Internet. These plans have
a downside in that they limit uture
data revenues while encouraging
wanton usage, Forrester said in
its report.
Thereore, carriers are attempting
to shit rom fat-rate pricing using
various methods. Some operators
are engaging in trac throttling or
users who surpass usage caps,while others, such as AT&T Mobility,
have initiated price hikes or tiered
pricing or high-megabyte users.
Yet operators or the most part
are taking baby steps toward ull-
blown policy control. Peter Jarich,
service director at Current Analy-
sis, contends that operators nd it
dicult to select a specic a path
that takes them away rom fat-
rate pricing.
Jarich recalls that years ago, a
hot topic was the idea o leveraging
premium charges or dierent con-
tent, such as charging dierently
or real-time video vs. Web brows-
ing vs. email downloads. According
to Jarich, this idea has so ar been
let in the dust because operators
couldnt discern how to charge or
dierent types o content without
alienating users.
Technology, Experimentation areKeys to Policy Controls Futureby tammy parker
Right now were charging every-
one the same or a certain level o
service, and were really not using
policy or related tools much at all,
said Jarich, who noted that tiered
services the proverbial gold, silver
and bronze pricing packages are
oten discussed but not actually
implemented.
Policy inherent in
new networksThe deployment o next-generation
networks will bring a new dawn or
policy control, which will no longer
be an add-on or postpaid-network
architecture but will instead become
an integral part o the core network.
Policy or 3G was almost kind
o a retrot. It came along ater
the initial denition, and so it
wasnt greatly adopted, said Dan
Warren, the GSMAs senior direc-
tor o technology.
However, policy is a undamental
part o LTE architecture. You cant
implement an LTE core network
easily without having a policy
control unction, Warren said.
The business case becomes trivial
when policy is a key part o the
network you want to deploy.
Copyright 2010 Tellabs.All rightsreserved.The following trademarksand service marksare owned by TellabsOperations,Inorits affiliatesin the United Statesand/orothercountries:TELLABS,TELLABS and T symbo
Be more than bandwidth.
Personalize your pipes.
Dumb pipes cant personalize the
mobile Internet. But a smart network
can. Users gain customized services
and bandwidth choice. You gain new
revenue streams, reduced costs and
sustained profitability.
Visit tellabs.com/4g to download
a free white paper and learn more.
d 5
Policy or 3G was almost kind o a retroft.It came along ater the initial defnition,and so it wasnt greatly adopted.
dan Warren, senior direCTor oF TeChnology, gsma
http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/ -
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
3/11
fercewireless.com
september 2010 september
According to Warren, those ina-
mous gold, silver and bronze pricing
packages will nally see the light
o day once LTE is implemented,
with tiered packages oering, or
instance, dierentiated peak rates
or prioritization within the network.
You can do a whole bunch o
clever stu around not just oering
better quality o experience around
all applications but being able to
oer a premium service to custom-
ers, which would generate a higherARPU, and a ser vice more similar
to the best-eorts service that we
have today to those who would
want to remain on the consumer-
based package and not pay or
that kind o premium treatment,
Warren said.
One key ingredient in policy con-
trol is deep- packet inspection (DPI),
which riles consumer watchdogs.
Though DPI need not be applied
to most trac on a network, it is
sometimes necessary, such as
when an operator must lter trac
rom potentially nearious sources.
DPI can be the greatest orce or
good or the greatest orce or evil,
depending upon how you look at
it, said Warren.
Carriers might also open them-
selves to criticism i they give
higher prioritization to one kind o
trac vs. another. Operators right
now are very sensitive to the ocus
which regulators are placing on a
level playing eld, he said, adding
that, nonetheless, there is a grow-
ing appreciation that some trac
requires a certain kind o handling
within a network.
Pondering the Possibilities
Warren oresees a day when opera-
tors make policy and DPI tools
available to developers or use in
application dierentiation. That
could produce a really nice end-to-
end story which allows developers
to responsibly dene the policy
which should be applied to their
applications, Warren said.
Policy-based apps with un-
damentally dierent QoS
requirements could all coexist on
a single device and be handled
automatically and correctly in the
network or an overall positive
consumer experience, he said.
Jarich, meanwhile, hopes opera-
tors become more upront about
their pricing motives. He noted, or
instance, i a carrier throttles down
a customers download speeds
once a usage cap is surpassed,
even when the network is not con-
gested, then the throttling is being
initiated more as a matter o prin-
ciple or in an attempt to make more
money o o the customer, who
might be led to sign up or a plan
with a higher usage cap in order to
avoid being throttled. In that circum-stance, said Jarich, then dont tell
me this is all about network con-
straints or resource constraints.
He added that operators should
make it easier or customers to
upgrade service plans on the run,
so users can, or instance, increase
short-term download speeds or
exceed a spectrum cap once in
a while. Not making things as
simple as possible is leaving a lot o
money on the table, Jarich said.
According to Warren, once
operators can quickly shape tra-
c by adjusting delays, bit-error
rates, packet delivery, buers and
more that will change the service
model on a per-application and per-
consumer basis. Because policy
control will be inherent in LTEs
architecture, then its down to the
operator to almost play with it oncetheyve got the tools in their hands
to nd what works best or them
and their consumers, Warren said.
Current Analysis Jarich also
said carriers need to start experi-
menting with dierent policy tools
and usage plans, adding that he
believes operators ultimately will
gure this out. l
Customers are in
love with smartphones
and other advanced
wireless devices. They
use them or every-
thing rom watching
videos late at night to
working on projects
during morning com-
mutes. With so manyapplication downloads
consuming huge
amounts o bandwidth,
mobile operators traditional pric-
ing modela fat monthly ee or
unlimited data usagejust doesnt
work any longer.
Some operators switched to
tiered billing, in which subscribers
pay a fat rate or data usage limited
to, say, 200 Mbps or 2 Gbps per
month. They hope this approach
discourages excessive use o
bandwidth, helps them control
the CAPEX/OPEX costs o adding
more network capacity and still
satises subscribers.
limited value of tiered
Pricing alone
Yet chances are tiered pricing will
prove to be o little value to opera-tors or subscribers. For operators,
tiered pricing relegates them to the
role o a utility provider o a dumb
pipe, which does nothing to help
them achieve long-term success
in the market. Subscribers behav-
ior wont change overnight. Many
people inevitably will go over data-
usage limits and experience sticker
shock when their bills arrive. They
may deect to another operator in
search o a better deal.
bundling value-added
services with tiered Pricing
Tiered pricing based on policy con-
trol is an important rst step. But,
by incorporating customized servic-
es in pricing models, operators can
avoid the aorementioned problems
and achieve their primary goals.
The ability to create valued-added
services and bundle them with
tiered pricing requires a subscriber-
and content-aware networking
solution, such as the Tellabs
SmartCore 9100 Platorm.
Compatible with 3G and 4Gtechnology, this type o solution
delivers real-time intelligence
about subscriber behavior, includ-
ing where a given customer is
physically located and the content
he/she is using. With this intel-
ligence, the operator can create
content-inspection services
mobile Internet oerings tailored
to individual subscribers usage
patterns. These might include,
instance, one or parents who
smartphones to monitor their c
drens Internet activities; anoth
or movie bus who watch str
ing video on mobile devices; a
another or road warriors who
mobile access to enterprise pr
ductivity applications.
a two-Part Pricing modeA subscriber-aware network als
makes it possible to develop a
two-part pricing model. One pa
consists o a base plan, priced
xed monthly ee, which cover
dened amount o data usage.
top o that is a value-based plan
priced at an incremental level,
the customized services select
by the consumer. Because the
pays or these services as part
o value-added pricing, the data
involved are not included with t
data measured or the tiered po
tion o the plan.
intelligence delivers
a win-win solution
Value-added services give subs
ers more control over bandwidt
usage and keeps them in the o
For operators, they create newrevenue streams, reduce costs
and help sustain protability. It
intelligent pricing scenario tailo
or success. l
sPonsored conte
Customized Services Lead toNew Mobile Pricing Models
d 3
Forecast: U.S. Data AccessRevenues, 2009-2014
annualdataa
ccess
revenues
($billions)
average monthly data access Price
2009
$17.34
2010
$17.24
2011
$17.13
2014
$16.64
2013
$16.83
2012
$16.99
$10.7$12.9
$14.7$16.4
$18.1$19.8
Source: Forrester Research Mobile Adoption and Sales Forecast 9/09 (U.S.)
http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/ -
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
4/11
fercewireless.com
september 2010 september
As unlimited data pricing
nears the end o its
liespan, U.S. operators
will experiment with user-
riendly plans.
Thanks to compelling
smartphones and fat-ratedata pricing, data usage has
skyrocketed on the nations
3G networks. So ar the trend
has translated into signicant
revenue growth or opera-
tors, but soon data trac will
outpace revenue. Wireless
operators will need to nd
new ways to monetize their
networks. As such, it appears
unlimited data plans are on
their way to extinction.
According to a recent
survey rom international
law rm Freshelds Bruck-
haus Deringer, nearly hal o
international mobile execu-
tives 48 percent predict
mobile operators will ocus on
developing new pricing mod-
els over the next three years,
with 55 percent agreeingthat tiered pricing is the way
orward in mature markets
and 47 percent arguing that
fat-rate all-you-can-eat data
tari plans are damaging their
ability to increase revenue.
The question now is: How
do operators crat user-
riendly plans that make
Pricing Models or TodaysWireless Consumer
by Lynnette Luna
more ecient use o their net-
work resources?
In the U.S., AT&T Mobility and
Leap Wireless have taken the
plunge into tiered pricing. AT&T
had already elt the pain o network
capacity problems in several big cit-
ies throughout 2009 thanks in partto the popularity o the iPhone. For
smartphones, AT&T oers 200 MB
or $15 per month or 2 GB or $25
per month, and users can purchase
additional buckets o data in each
billing cycle. Leap is now oering
2.5 GB o data or $40 per month,
5 GB or $50 per month or 7.5 GB
or $60 per month. Previously, Leap
oered 5 GB or $40 per month.
AT&T declined to be interviewed
by FierceWirelessbut pointed to
comments its executives made
during the companys most recent
quarterly conerence call about
some o the trends it is seeing.
AT&T CFO Rick Lindner said that
early results rom the companys
move to tiered data pricing plans
have been encouraging. In par-
ticular, he said the company had
expected a lot o customers to
migrate to the lower price point
($15 per month or 200 MB o
data) but a large portion migrated
to the $25 per month or 2 GB o
data plan. In addition, he said AT&Tis seeing benets rom lowering
the point o entry so custom-
ers can move into the integrated
device category and try data ser-
vices. We believe over time they
will migrate to higher-tiered plans,
he said.
A drawback to megabyte pricing,
however, is the act that operators
put the onus on the end user to
d 9
http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.openet.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/ -
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
5/11
fercewireless.com
september 2010 september
gure out what a megabyte o data
really is, despite real-time alerts
about usage and other tools rom
operators that try to help custom-
ers understand what sort o actions
might gobble up their megabytes.
As such, megabyte-pricing is
expected to serve as the launching
pad or more innovative usage-
based pricing. Susie Kim Riley,
chie marketing ocer with net-
work policy company Tekelec, sees
AT&Ts recent move as an encour-
aging sign as the company seeks to
segment data services.
They are starting o by count-
ing bytes, but that is only thebeginning, she said. Operators
will be able to do a lot more cre-
ative things.
Riley said options could range
rom paying or a higher quality o
service such as aster data speeds
to picking and choosing video pack-
ages or paying or better quality or
certain applications such as gaming.
TeliaSonera, which operates
the worlds rst LTE networks in
Sweden and Norway, is mulling
a new mobile data pricing model
that involves bundling the network
usage charges with the cost o
mobile content used into a single
pricing plan. As such, subscribers
would pay or the content and net-
work resources they use instead o
simply paying or a certain amount
o data.
Roger Entner, senior vice presi-
dent and head o research and
insights or the Telecom Practice
o Nielsen, believes the next
innovation in packaging pricing
will come in the orm o what he
calls the total communications
package. Just as operators on the
voice side have instituted am-
ily plans that pool voice minutes,
they will do the same on the data
side, and charge another $5 to
$10 per person.
Mark Lowenstein, managing
director o Mobile Ecosystem, also
expects to see a more aggressive
move to incorporate data as a part
o amily plans. Thats one o the
major benets o AT&Ts $15 pric-
ing plan. We will see creative ways
to add members o a amily ontodata plans via lower priced plans or
plans that include buckets o giga-
bytes that can be shared across the
amily, he said.
In the same vein, smartphone
users are increasingly becoming
tablet users as well. Operators will
also have the opportunity to oer
single-pricing package plans or
both devices, Entner said. Today,
AT&T charges separate tiered pric-
ing or both Apples iPhone and
iPad. The iPad, however, uses a
pay-as-you-go pricing plan.
It will be about this: I take care
o you and have a relationship
with you as the customer. I dont
have a relationship with the phone
or the tablet. I want to take care
o your communication needs,
Entner said. l
With the current demand or
broadband, operators are being
orced to walk a tightrope between
competitively priced customer
oers to grow market share, and
managing the network costs o
surging data trac.Policy Managements ability to
dynamically control and manage
the subscriber experience, when
using a service or application, has
emerged as an enabler o service
dierentiation and a source o
incremental revenue. As well as
providing a means to better allocate
network capacity, and manage the
associated capital expenditure.
Intelligent next generation net-
works bring with them the promise
o a more personalized, immedi-
ate and connected experience or
subscribers. I the nancial benets
o this investment are to accrue to
operators, theyll need to evolve
their oerings beyond current
approaches that simply oer a big
bucket o data or fat-rated plans.
business modelimProvement
Policy Management provides
operators with a means to improve
their current business models,
improving how data subscriptions
are packaged, and creating oppor-
tunities or incremental revenues.
There is a huge disparity in the
amount o data and bandwidth
subscribers consume even or
customers using similar devices.
Policy Management acilitates data
plan innovation, enabling operators
to fexibly congure a combina-
tion o bandwidth speed, data
allowance, device type, duration,time-o-day, or the exclusion o
certain applications into attractive
market oerings.
It makes it easier or operators
to segment their customer base,
oering data plan options and pric-
es to cover heavy and light users.
This ensures subscriber revenues
are optimized, and ensures those
who use the most data, contribute
most to the costs. It also provides
an incentive or subscribers gen-
erally, to moderate their usage,
providing some protection againstnetwork congestion.
Promotions
Policy Management, when com-
bined with charging capabilities,
also makes it easier or operators
to promote and sell services. Trig-
gering an in-session redirect, a
subscriber can be re-directed to a
sel-care portal in real-time, ope
tors can respond dynamically to
changes in subscriber or netwo
state or activity. This makes it
possible or operators to dynam
cally oer promotions, based o
individual subscribers activity t
up-sell and cross-sell services e
to renew a data allowance, pur
chase a roaming bundle, or req
a bandwidth boost.
subscriber -configuredcontrols
Increasingly, operators are also
looking to policy management
dierentiate their services, by
ing value to the user experienc
Policy-based controls such as
notications, bill shock / roamin
controls, parental and content c
trols, URL ltering, and time-o
restrictions shape the custome
experience, especially when th
can be congured and controll
by subscribers.
summary
Policy Management helps oper
tors to eciently allocate nite
network resources, improve
business models, and oer a d
erentiated customer experienc
In a rapidly evolving market or
access, policy controls give opetors much needed fexibility to
quickly respond to competitor t
tics, new devices, applications
changing consumer data habits
Learn more: www.openet.com
sPonsored conteEvolution o Policy Management:rom Network Controls toService DierentiationJonathan Downey,
Director of proDuct marketing at openet
d 7
Smartphone users are increasingly becoming tabletusers as well. Operators will also have the opportunity
to oer single-pricing package plans or both devices.
roger enTner, senior viCe presidenT and head oF
researCh and insighTs, TeleCom praCTiCe oF ni elsen
Today, AT&T hasseparate tiered
pricing or the iPadbut analysts saythat this modelmay change in
the uture.
Simply oering a bigbucket o data provideslimited scope or servicedierentiation or value-add
http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.openet.com/http://www.openet.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/ -
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
6/11
fercewireless.com
september 2010 september
NetworkThrottling:A Courtesy orHindrance toHeavy Users?by peggy aLbright
Bandwidth throttling is one
way to control subscribers
who use excess data but
consumers typically dontfnd this tactic appealing.
Bandwidth throttling is
an easy way to control sub-
scribers excessive data
consumption to ree up
capacity or other users, but
due to the punitive nature
o the technique, operators
hesitate to apply it. Throttling
is nding new acceptance,
however, in value-added ser-
vices and applications. It will
also have a place in emerging
advanced trac management
strategies that, combined
with service prioritization
techniques, should make bet-
ter use o the network overall.
Throttling reers to the
practice o slowing the data
speed or individual users
who exceed their monthly
bandwidth limits. Throttled
customers can still make
voice calls and use mobile
data, but they may not receive
the ull bandwidth they previ-
ously enjoyed or downloading
or uploading content. Throt-
tling is temporary; as soon
as the subscribers account enters
a new billing period, the eature
is cancelled and the subscribers
service returns to normal.
Throttling gained attention this
year when T-Mobile USA divulged
that it would slow data speeds or
subscribers who exceed their 5GB
monthly limits. T-Mobile positioned
the method as a means to deter
excess usage and help customers
avoid costly overage ees.
Sprint Nextel is adamantly against
slowing data speeds or custom-
ers o its 3G or Clearwire-based
mobile WiMAX services. However,
it has reserved the right to suspend
o-network data services or cus-
tomers that use data excessively
while roaming on other operators
mobile broadband networks.
In general, throttling is intended
to prevent individual subscribers
rom using the network unairly,
to the detriment o other custom-
ers. It is applied according to air
usage and bandwidth limits delin-
eated in a customers mobile data
service contract.
Throttling has several benets.
It can help ree needed spectrum
or operators whose network
limitations are too severe to allow
or true, all-you-can-eat services
and help ensure that all custom-
ers receive the highest-possible
service quality. It can make a
dierence or operators that are
short on radio access network
capacity, struggling to obtain
cell site permits, or engineering
around backhaul bottlenecks. It
also can help an operator maxi-
mize the value o its operational
and capital expenditures.
Throttling is oten positioned as
a courtesy to heavy usage custom-
ers, who might unknowingly incur
exorbitant per-megabyte charges
when they exceed their service
plan limits. Operators must have
the capability in Europe, where
laws designed to prevent bill shock
caused by mobile data roaming
require notiying customers when
their data roaming reaches a certain
trigger point and stopping service
under certain conditions.
The biggest disadvantage or
throttling is the negative associa-
tion o being heavy handed. Even
though it is applied under strictly
dened terms, many customers
dont pay attention to their service
agreements and can be surprised
when throttling occurs.
Throttling can also be miscon-
strued as getting in the way o net
neutrality. Because o this sen-
sitivity, operators need to make
sure they are explaining it clearly
to their customers.
You dont want it to be con-used with blocking access, said
Rehan Jalil, senior vice president or
IP and mobile Internet at Tellabs.
Essentially, an operator enables
throttling by programming the
policy controller to activate the
throttling eature when the network
observes that a user has exceeded
their usage quota. It is airly easy
to implement because it does not
require more complicated and
sometimes controversial approach-
es such as deep packet inspection.
Most operators have the capability
in their networks, even i they dont
use it.
Any operator that has a air
usage clause in their contracts
needs to have this capability, said
Ali Shah, director o broadband
strategy in the strategy and mar-
keting organization or Ericsson
North America.
Oten, throttling will deliver only
incremental improvements to net-
work capacity. Because heavy data
users represent a small portion o
the customer base, and because
throttled customers represent an
even smaller segment, its use is
generally limited. Also, because
throttling is triggered by an indi-
vidual subscribers usage and not
network conditions, it may not
be necessary i the network has
plenty o capacity available at that
time. Finally, throttling one cus-
tomer in a cell site can be utile i
multiple, other heavy users in the
site are adversely aecting network
perormance anyway.
As operators move away rom
all-you-can-eat plans and adopt
volume-based pricing, and as
more operators add policy con-
trollers to their networks, morewill have opportunity to introduce
throttling mechanisms. Vendors
are already nding innovative
ways to employ tools developed
originally or throttling purposes
to create more personalized plans
and quality-o-service eatures or
individual customers.
The myPolicy application oe
by Bridgewater Systems, or ex
ple, enables customers to conn
to the policy controller to set th
own usage limits and usage ale
provision quality-o-service pre
erences or their accounts. The
application also helps educate
users about data consumption
Ericssons Shah and Tellabs
Jalil are each excited about th
capabilities throttling will oer
when it is enorced on a dynam
or as-needed basis to help reli
network congestion.Doing it more intelligently, c
I think, be the biggest opportun
we have, Jalil said.
Shah recommends combinin
it with prioritization. I capacity
is available, a customer who ha
exceeded their quota will not e
rience throttling. When conges
occurs, the network will allocat
data throughput to users based
the priority level they have paid
The network will manage the t
rom quota-violators or all users
necessary according to air usa
terms and in ways the custom
understand. In theory, the appr
optimizes network access at al
times in a way that should kee
users satised.
We believe i prioritization is
added to throttling, there is a m
advantage o combining these
two, Shah said. l
We believe i prioritization is added to throttling,there is a major advantage o combining these two.
ali shah, direCTor oF broadband sTraTegy in The sTraTegy
and markeTing organizaTion, eriCsson norTh ameriCa.
http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/ -
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
7/11
fercewireless.com
september 2010 september
Policy control tools can be
used to better understand the
customers usage patterns and
activities. But operators must be
mindul o how they implement
these services.
In years past, mobile operators
used policy management tools to
control bandwidth or balance load
at the network level. Today, with
the use o policy control technolo-
gies deployed in the packet core,
operators have new opportunities
to congure services in much more
specic ways and at the individual
user level.
However, the new business
opportunities created by these
cutting-edge policy control tools
also introduce new complications,
and that is the issue o customer
privacy. Customization by denition
requires a close understanding o
what the user wants or needs, but
the highly granular understanding
o user subscriptions, application
requirements, location or other
personal details that many newapplications require can involve
particularly sensitive matters o
condentiality. To what extent do
customized services undermine
the customers privacy? How do
operators build businesses with
technologies and services that
involve privacy issues?
Fortunately, while many emerg-
ing customization services require
that the network have an under-
standing o potentially condential
inormation, this is not always the
case. Policy management doesnt
necessarily require drilling into indi-
vidual user inormation, said FredKemmerer, chie technical ocer at
Genband.
Policy controls used to adjust
an individuals data bandwidth,
or example, can be activated by
metering triggers in the network
that identiy when the customers
usage quota is exceeded, without
the need to observe characteristics
o customers trac.
Policy controls can also be used
in ways that are highly transparent
to the user, and with the users
direct consent and involvement. As
operators introduce data plans that
have bandwidth limits, or example,
they will be able to oer policy con-
trol applications that subscribers
can activate to customize, monitor
and manage their data consump-
sPonsored conte
Whats in a name? That which
we call Policy Control by any other
name would not sound so dire.
The people that came up with the
industry term that reers to our
niche o the telecommunications
industry really didnt seem to think
things through sure technically it
might have some merit, but to the
wider public it just sounds scary.Policy Control is essentially
implemented in mobile networks to
achieve two distinct tasks:
Maximizetheefciencyofthe
data network that is to make
sure that even when parts o
the network are congested,
time or delay sensitive trac
(such as VoIP or Video) can
still operate eectively and
deliver an acceptable level o
user experience (Control or
Optimization)
Offermobilebroadband
subscribers (i.e., customers)
a better quality and more
personalized mobile Internet
experience.
Fundamentally, we are concerned
with keeping the networking run-
ning, the applications fowing and
enabling access to content. Whenconditions on the data network are
less than optimum we endeavor
to ensure all subscribers get air
access to whatever bandwidth is
available. While individual operators
may have dierent views o how
to best manage their own network
under adverse conditions, tools that
provide granular visibility down to
the application,
subscriber and
into the topology
are critical or
making an intel-
ligent decision on
how to optimize
their inrastruc-
ture.
The same tech-nology enables
operators to
dierentiate cus-
tomer oerings.
For too long subscribers have had
little choice in how they purchase
Internet access and over-the-top
services. Mobile Internet and Policy
Control are together changing that.
Policy Control enables opera-
tors to set policies or individual
subscribers, giving customers the
chance to choose an Internet expe-
rience (or service plan) that suits
both their needs and their budget.
While some internet users just like
to catch up on the latest news and
email, others may be heavily into
online gaming, or social network-
ing. Dierent content, applications,
usage habits and devices all
contribute to where the MobileInternet is heading.
It seems viable that the mobile
core, o which policy control is
already an essential eature, will
become the central hub or all
access topologies. We are already
seeing the convergence o xed
and mobile networks, where
operators want to provide custom-
ers with a single policy (service
plan) across all types o topolo
whether mobile, WiFi, DSL Ca
etc. The intelligence and the de
sion making ability o the Polic
Charging and Control unctiona
as dened in the 3GPP will ena
users to benet rom a single
policy across multiple devices
(smartphone, iPads, ebooks,
dongles, etc.), topologies, appl
tions and content.
The bottom line is that Mobil
Broadband is the uture a utu
that is already here. Enabling po
cies on networks to better opti
the delivery o content, and at t
same time giving the consumechoice in how they use (and pa
or) that content is key in shapi
how that uture will look. l
Do Customized Services Impedeon Customer Privacy?by peggy aLbright
Policy managementdoesnt necessarily requiredrilling into individualuser inormation.
Fred kemmerer, ChieF
TeChniCal oFFiCer, genband
tion and presence, location and
other personal inormation.
To suggest another example,
parents will be able to use policycontrol applications to speciy
which hours during evening when
their young children can access
certain mobile data services, or
provision their childs phone to dis-
allow service during certain periods
o the day.
d 15
Policy: Shaping the Futureby Jonathon gorDon, Director ofmarketing, aLLot communications
http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/ -
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
8/11
fercewireless.com
september 2010 september
As operators oer policy-related
options that have privacy implica-
tions, Kemmerer says they will
draw rom established and well-
developed mechanisms to protect
privacy and make sure data is not
used inappropriately.
What were all about here is
extending the privacy protections
that carriers have used or years in
the areas o their business where
the regulatory ramework is more
clear, as well as extending theusers ability to adopt services and
control them to make the whole
thing work, he said.
Privacy control applications that
are most likely to generate privacy
concerns are those that will be
used in conjunction with subscriber
data management tools to add
a measure o sophistication to
mobile advertising, location-based
and other value-added services.
In these cases, the application o
easy-to-understand and very speci-
ic privacy precautions will do much
to make these emerging services
more acceptable, appealing and
meaningul to customers.
For example, policy control
techniques can be employed, along
with strict rules on how the data
will be used and shared with third
parties, to let customers denewhen, where and under what
circumstances they are willing to
receive mobile advertisements and
whether those ads should have
access to location-related inorma-
tion. The tools also can be used to
let customers control how pres-
ence-related inormation on social
networking sites is used.
I you have opt-in and opt-out
capabilities, a sense o who the
customer is, what is valuable to
them and what would be useul,
then I think you have a stronger
oering, said Shira Levine, direct-
ing analyst or next generation OSS
and policy at Inonetics Research.
In act, when it comes to mobile
advertising and location-based ser-
vices, operators will need to have
that understanding i they want the
program to succeed. An advertis-ing solution that does not employ
some level o analytics to make
sure advertising reaches only those
customers who are riendly to it,
or example, could risk alienating
the larger customer base or, worse,
create a backlash in the media.
Kemmerer described a scenario
in which a customer might agree
to opt-in to a program
that oers the customer a
higher amount o bandwidth
per month i they allow the
operator to observe aspects
o their trac, make it
anonymous and aggregate
it with other data or use
in advertising programs.
Assuming that operators
will protect user privacy and
promise anonymity in ways
that compare, at minimum,
to those used legally by
search engines today,there is certainly a strong
component o people in
the industry that believes
operators should be allowed
to employ such techniques,
he said.
So ar, operator con-
cerns about privacy and
uncertainty surrounding
regulatory treatment o privacy
issues have discouraged most
companies rom allowing services
such as targeted mobile advertising
on their networks.
Eventually, however, operators
needs to create advanced ser-
vices strategies to drive revenues
on their 4G networks will motivate
them to introduce customized
value-added services. And as
advertising regulations becomes
clearer, the need to ensure privacycould become a driver or invest-
ing in policy control solutions,
Levine suggested.
Any mobile advertising initiative
will need to include some sort o
policy element to really ensure that
subscribers are being treated in a
way that protects their privacy,
Levine said. l
Unleashing the Possibilities oNext-Generation Policy Controlby Lynnette Luna
Network throttling is the
start but more advanced
policy control solutions oer
the potential or real-time
transactions.
Its clear that the popularity
o wireless data has caught onin most places around the globe
witnessed by the act that AT&T
Mobility the exclusive provider
o Apples iPhone and other
providers such as Orange in the
U.K. ound themselves grappling
with network congestion that hit
its peak in 2009. As such, a host
o companies oer solutions to
throttle and shape network tra-
c to handle the congestion. But
policy companies say managing
congestion is just the beginning
o what operators can do to help
better monetize data services.
Bill Diote, president o policy
management company Broad-
Hop has termed network
throttling solutions as Policy
1.0 that will progress into more
sophisticated policies orcharging or services and their
attributes, such as quality o ser-
vice. He calls this Policy 2.0.
Policy 2.0 goes hand in hand
with enorcement unctions but
digs down into an operators
network to nely slice and dice
new service oerings based
on policy and charge them in
real time. Rather than ocus-
ing closely on mobile gateway
control such as current genera-
tions o policy control solutions,
Policy 2.0 requires sotware-ba
components that are centralize
and can communicate in real-ti
with multiple mechanisms, rom
the mobile gateway to the GGS
and have the capacity to proce
massive amount o real-time tra
actions, Diote said.
It creates a host o possibilitie
Peter Ahimovic, head o band
width and policy management
Telcordia, talks about the ability
operators to sell base packages
but allow subscribers to contin
add on to their packages, whetthats or 30 days, one day or a
hour. For instance, a subscribe
plan may not include peer-to-pe
le sharing, but i that subscrib
attempts to perorm that type o
unction, he or she may receive
notication the service can be
ed or a ee. Perhaps a subscrib
wants better quality o service
a particular video download but
others. Operators can charge o
that, he said.
Now it gets into the whole
paradigm o giving eedback to
customer, Ahimovic said. Yo
have a base service and can up
packages, all o which would ha
their own corresponding charge
and QoS.
Diote also envisions operator
beginning to layer additional se
vices onto base packages or dusers, and he sees policy capa
ties added to devices, turning t
into remote controls o sorts to
select programs, applications a
service levels.
You can tie it into the whole
throttling story by oering peop
d 13
d
http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/ -
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
9/11
fercewireless.com
september 2010 september
choice to continue their application
in high bandwidth or switch to low
bandwidth in exchange or credits
to use later, Diote said. The key is
giving users a choice.
Diote said North American opera-
tors are still skeptical about such
charging mechanisms, and, ironi-
cally, emerging markets are coming
to the oreront o this concept.
North America has been ocused
on Policy 1.0, which has been about
deensive uses o technology tell-ing customers what they could and
couldnt do on the network, Diote
said. Meanwhile, the CTOs and
CMOs o operators in emerging
markets were sitting with us asking
us how to use policy to be a plat-
orm or innovation.
Indeed, in emerging markets like
India and Malaysia, where cut-
throat prepaid plans are the norm,
operators are deploying dierenti-
ated services such as a parental
control service that enables par-
ents to create individual settings
or their childrens phones that
includes capabilities such as select-
ing times during school hours that
texting is allowed, limiting Internet
access or even turning o devices
at certain times.
Ahimovic believes North Ameri-
can operators will rst evolve tiered
pricing plans, which are still in their
inancy. He calls that Policy 1.5.
North America may go through
this stage o sharing quotas, such
as amily data plans or one price
and everyone gets to use it, he
said. But I look at it as a consumer
mysel, and the eedback is how do I
know how much a megabyte is?l
The importance o the mobile
control plane, including subscriber,
service and policy controls, is
essential to operators as they
manage the complexities o rapidgrowth in the number o devices
accessing mobile data services
and the corresponding increase in
mobile data trac.
To date, operators have ocused
on implementing air usage controls,
driven by the extensive use o fat-
rate plans. However, as operators
move to tiered and usage based
service plans, the role o policy con-
trol is evolving beyond air usage to
include a plethora o use cases.
the transition from flat-
rate to Personalized,
tiered services
Network, device, and application
policy provides operators with con-
trols to implement tiered service
plans that let subscribers choose
the combination o usage and price
that best meets their needs.
In a tiered model, lower-cost
plans can be used to target casual
users, middle-o-the-road plans can
be crated to meet the needs o the
average user, and premium plans
can be used to target tech-savvy
consumers and business users.
To successully introduce tiered
services, operators must give
subscribers a way to monitor their
mobile data usage in real time
such as on device policy solutions.
Bridgewaters myPolicy solution
provides enterprise and consumercustomers with a real-time view o
their mobile data usage via a smart-
phone application. It also enables
operators to provide real-time,
personalized oers such as:
temporaryserviceupgrade;
freedaypassforanew
service;
bandwidthboostservices;
unlimiteddownloadsduringoff-
peak hours; and
location-basedsocial
networking services.
Pre-Purchase data services
Pre-paid services are a popular way
o increasing market penetration.
They give subscribers the fexibility
to buy a preset amount o data with
the convenience o paying or these
services via credit card, voucher or
promotional oers.
With the recent growth in mobile
data trac, the pre-paid billing
servers used by operators have
become increasingly complex. Pre-
purchase plans make lie simpler
or the customer as well as the
operator, who no longer has to deal
with the cost and complexity o
deploying a pre-paid billing server.
In this scenario, policy contro
enables usage to be metered
based on time or volume whic
must be paid or in advance by
consumer.
machine-to-machine
services
Machine-to-machine (M2M)
services are growing rapidly, w
an estimated 60 billion machin
serving a global audience o six
billion people. Applications in ar
such as healthcare, public saet
and energy are uelling the driv
towards more ubiquitous M2M
services.
The control plane unction in
and 4G networks plays a centra
role in the delivery o these ser
es by managing network resou
devices, and applications. Publ
saety services, or example, ca
benet rom automated comm
nication between trac camer
health monitors, and devices, w
priority given to emergency dat
trac.
These use cases demonstrat
how policy control as an integr
part o the mobile control plane
evolved, with air usage contro
just one o many ways that ope
tors are implementing smarter
network, device and applicatio
controls to deliver new service
Operators have to managenetwork trafc to stop
congestion. But the key
is making sure they dont
discriminate one type o
trafc rom another.
The wireless industry is
hoping the Federal Commu-
nications Commission will
tread lightly when it comes to
placing net neutrality require-
ments on wireless network.
I it doesnt, there will be a
tangled web o unintended
consequences that will stymie
the operators ability to inno-
vate and simply oer quality
service, industry experts warn.
O course, such statements
are viewed by consumer
advocates as threats. When
Verizon and Google announced
a joint public policy statement
on net neutrality that orbids
any kind o prioritization o
Internet trac over wired
networks but proposed to
exempt wireless networks,
Google the staunch support
o net neutrality was labeled
as anti- consumer.
The argument or exempting wire-
less rom the net neutrality debate
has centered on the act that wire-
less spectrum is a nite resource
and operators cant easily throw
more capacity into their networks
to continually meet the insatiable
demand rom their customers or
mobile broadband services. They
must be allowed to shape trac,
throttle heavy users when needed,
charge those who want to take
up more network resources and
prioritize more critical trac, suchas VoIP, over other trac.
The FCC acknowledged the
need to regulate trac on wire-
less networks when it comes
to net neutrality, but its unclear
just how ar operators will be
allowed to go. In September the
FCC issued a notice o proposed
d 16
d 19
Does theNet NeutralityDebate Helpor Hinderthe Need orPolicy ControlTools?by Lynnette Luna
Operator Use Cases or the3 Ps: Policy, Personalizationand Proftability
by DaviD sharpLey,
senior vice presiDent,briDgewater systems
sPonsored cont
http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/ -
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
10/11
fercewireless.com
september 2010 september
rulemaking that pertains to how
wireless networks and specialized
services should be handled under
a net neutrality regime.
The NPRM seeks comment on
how, to what extent, and when
openness principles should apply
to mobile wireless platorms, with
a particular emphasis on urther-
ing innovation, private investment,
competition and reedom o
expression, the FCC said. Mobile
broadband providers such as AT&TMobility and Leap Wireless have
recently introduced pricing plans
that charge dierent prices based
on the amount o data a customer
uses. The emergence o these
new business models may reduce
mobile broadband providers incen-
tives to employ more restrictive
network management practices
that could run aoul o open Inter-
net principles. Additionally, Verizon
and Google issued a proposal or
open Internet legislation that would
exclude wireless, except or pro-
posed transparency requirements.
Just taking away the ability to pri-
oritize trac would undermine the
very nature o mobile broadband
networks as the quality o services
such as video and VoIP will be
severely compromised, said Phil
Marshall, head o Tolaga Research.You cant do that. Otherwise,
the reduced quality o service will
make these networks less eco-
nomical, much less economical,
Marshall said. There is no mobile
broadband business case i you are
unable to manage trac.
Susie Kim Riley, chie marketing
ocer with network policy com-
pany Tekelec, has spent time with
the FCC looking to understand the
commissions concerns around net
neutrality. She said its clear that
operators have to manage their net-
works to mitigate congestion. The
key is making sure operators dont
discriminate one type o trac
such as peer-to-peer trac over
another when throttling that trac.
Everyone agrees that operators
need to actively manage networks,
but they have to put in techniques
that do it in a non-application-spe-
cic way. That is network neutralriendly, Riley said.
However, the FCC is most con-
cerned about are service providers
who charge content providers to
transmit content over their broad-
band pipes, she said. But that
doesnt mean mobile operators
themselves cant oer a service
that a subscriber is willing to pay
more or, Riley said.
Its no longer the operator charg-
ing the content provider. Its nowabout the subscriber choosing to
pay more or a better service, Riley
said. Sign up or a higher charging
plan o certain applications you care
about and could perorm better.
Tiered service pricing based on
certain buckets o megabytes is
the rst step in that direction, Riley
said. And as the FCC alludes to in
its NPRM, the emergence o new
usage-based pricing plans could
give operators less incentive to
throttle and manage usage on their
networks in the rst place.
Jonathon Gordon, director o
marketing at Allot Communications,
said many aspects o policy control
are positive or the subscriber, but
the industry has been stuck on
talk o throttling users rather than
improving service delivery.
A lot o what we do now is
building on technology that ensures
the network runs more e cientlyby giving operators the ability to
manage services and oer things
such as premium video and con-
tent adaptation or making services
work aster on smartphones,
Gordon said.
This concept is part o the next
generation o policy control that
enables operators to charge based
on services and quality o service,
which in turn have the eect o
mitigating network congestion.The concern I have is that
consumers might look at it in a
negative way since they are getting
charged because they want bet-
ter video, Riley said. Consumers
are conditioned to pay or this big
bucket. Its like everyone being con-
ditioned to fy rst class and all o a
sudden they have to pay or it. l
sPonsored conte
The fat-rate unlimited
data plan is an unsus-
tainable business model
which has dangerously
trained consumers to
believe that data is
cheap. Tiered pricing,courtesy o policy con-
trol, is a step in the right
direction, but its not the
nal answer.
Consumers appetite
or mobile data is here
to stay, so there is little
risk o a serious back-
slide in mobile data usage as tiered
packages become the norm. The
main risk is a return to uncertainty
as consumers will again be let
wondering how much it costs to
go online. Is it cheaper to take a
taxi or walk using GPS on a mobile
device? Conusion leads to dissatis-
action which leads to churn.
So, i unlimited and quota-limited
data packages have inherent dan-
gers, what else can policy control
oer to improve the situation? In
its current orm, not much; thatis probably why the basic quota-
counting and quota cut-o has been
pushed so hard. However, with a
new, subtler breed o application-
specic policy control systems,
the context o what a consumer is
doing can allow service providers to
richer, more personalized oerings
to consumers.
value-based Pricing
Tiered pricing plans need to be
presented to the end-user in a
meaningul way that directly relates
to value. Megabytes and gigabytes
o data simply do not have meaning
to the majority o users. In the retail
world, consumers inherently under-
stand the cost and value o buying
a DVD. The cost o the content (the
movie) and the means o delivering
it (the store) are integrated, so there
is no conusion. But i they had
to pay the retail outlet and studioseparately each time they viewed
it, would they be conused? Abso-
lutely. Thus, the danger o todays
tiered plans is that it disconnects
the inherent value o the content
with the cost o delivering it.
web-integrated Packages
One way to inject real value into
todays data plans is to integra
web actions like sending a
Facebook message into a mo
compelling, more persona
ized package. Why orce
consumers to consider th
per-byte cost o accessin
the Internet on their mobi
device to send a messag
a riend on Facebook?
Instead, operators could
oer a text-savvy packor a certain demographic
that included 1,000 mes-
sages SMS, Facebook,
Twitter doesnt matter.
not about paying or som
thing that was previously
ree; it is about putting a
price on something that h
real value to consumers and let
them monitor their own behav
which includes easy upgrade
downgrade options.
In order to roll out richer prici
plans which are more relevant t
consumers lives, operators ne
to nd a more dynamic, applica
aware version o policy control
greater transparency so consum
can sel-regulate. Without it, th
tiered pricing model will be rau
with conusion and dissatisact
Openwave Trac Mediationpowers more service-oriented
icy management which will ope
the door to the market demand
dynamic and targeted data plan
d 17
There is no mobile broadbandbusiness case i you areunable to manage trafc.
phil marshall, head oF Tolaga researCh
Beyond Policy Control:Developing Customized andTargeted Data Plansby ken Denman, ceo of openwave systems
click to view diagram
http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/http://www.fiercewireless.com/ -
8/3/2019 Policy Rules in 4G
11/11
september 2010
http://www.fiercewireless.com/