Points to consider

44

description

When are LFTs indicated? How are isolated borderline LFT results managed? Is LFT monitoring necessary for people on statins? What are the best tests of liver failure? Who is at risk of chronic hepatitis? How is acute hepatitis managed in primary care? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Points to consider

Page 1: Points to consider
Page 2: Points to consider

Points to consider

• When are LFTs indicated?

• How are isolated borderline LFT results managed?

• Is LFT monitoring necessary for people on statins?

• What are the best tests of liver failure?

• Who is at risk of chronic hepatitis?

• How is acute hepatitis managed in primary care?

• Is non-alcoholic liver disease a benign condition?

• What is the role of GGT?

Page 3: Points to consider

Introduction

• Most liver problems are managed in primary care

• Testing and interpretation can be challenging

• Consider clinical findings, previous liver function

tests and other test results

Page 4: Points to consider

Requesting LFTs

• Liver function testing is not indicated for

asymptomatic people without risk factors

Page 5: Points to consider

Asymptomatic people at risk of abnormal LFTs

• Diabetes or metabolic syndrome (increased risk of

NAFLD)

• Excessive alcohol intake

• Chronic hepatitis B

• Chronic hepatitis C

Page 6: Points to consider

Excessive alcohol intake

• GGT, macrocytosis, triglycerides and uric acid are

both non-sensitive and non-specific to EtOH

• Screening questionnaires give better results

• GGT has better predictive value when there is

strong suspicion of alcohol excess

Page 7: Points to consider

Diabetes or metabolic syndrome

• Diabetes, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance

and dyslipidaemia, increase the risk of NAFLD

• People with these conditions will benefit from

occasional measurement of LFTs at diagnosis,

start of antidiabetic therapy and any other time

indicated by clinical judgment

Page 8: Points to consider

Chronic hepatitis B

• 50 - 90% neonates and children infected with hepatitis will develop chronic hepatitis B infection, but < 5% of adults.

• Chronic hepatitis B carriers have ~ 25% risk of developing liver damage, cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer.

• LFTs should be tested at least 6 monthly.

• Screening for hepatitis B infection, using HBsAg, is recommended for all people of Maori, Pacific or Asian ethnicity over the age of 15 years, who have not previously been immunised.

Page 9: Points to consider

Chronic hepatitis C

• Most people will not be symptomatic during the

acute infection but approximately 70% will

remain infected.

• Chronic infections carry a substantial risk of liver

damage, cirrhosis and liver cancer.

• Test people who had blood transfusions prior

1992, inject street drugs or share needles.

Page 10: Points to consider

People at risk of abnormal LFTs because of other

illnesses Liver disease is associated with a wide range of other illnesses:

• Haemochromatosis

• Autoimmune diseases, including coeliac disease

• Chronic inflammatory bowel disease

• Metastatic cancer

• Clinically significant thyroid disease

• Right heart failure

Page 11: Points to consider

People at risk of abnormal LFTs because of drugs

Drugs which LFT monitoring is recommended in primary care:

Valproic acid Ketoconazole

Methrotrexate Dantrolene

Amiodarone Thiazolidinediones

Azathioprine Synthetic retinoids

Anti-tuberculous drugs Chemotherapy drugs

Page 12: Points to consider

Routine monitoring of LFTs no longer considered necessary

for statin use• Risk of liver damage from statin use has been overstated.

• Liver failure occurs with statins is similar to liver failure rate

in general population.

• Irreversible liver damage resulting from statin therapy is

exceedingly rare.

• Routine monitoring is not necessary.

• Statins should not be withheld in patients with baseline

abnormal LFTs.

Page 13: Points to consider

People at risk of abnormal LFTs because of other abnormal blood

testsIn some situations LFTs may be indicated following

abnormalities in apparently unrelated tests. Examples are:

• Abnormal iron studies/elevated ferritin

• Abnormalities on blood film

– Macrocytosis

– Neutropenia

– Thrombocytopenia

Page 14: Points to consider

Liver function testing when there are clinical features of

liver disease Physical features of liver disease

Fatigue, pruritis, vague RUQ pain Non-specific features

Jaundice Acute hepatitis, biliary obstruction or advanced chronic liver disease

Wasting Protein-calorie malnutrition from cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma

Abdominal pain, fever Acute cholangitis, cholecystitis or liver abscess

Spider naevi Gynaecomastia Testicular atrophy Palmar erythema

Cirrhosis

Encephalopathy AscitesAcute GI bleeding Coagulopathy

Advanced liver disease (decompensated)

Page 15: Points to consider

Interpretation of liver function tests

Abnormal liver function tests must be interpreted with

regard to clinical context and results of previous tests:

• History of symptoms

• Medication history

• Occupational exposure

• Family history

• Social history

• Physical examination

Page 16: Points to consider

Typical patterns of liver dysfunction

Liver dysfunction Biochemical markers

Hepatocyte integrity AST, ALT

Cholestasis Alk Phos, GGT, Bilirubin

Liver function mass Albumin, INR

Page 17: Points to consider

Hepatocyte injury: usually results in ALT and/or AST

elevation

Most likely causes of hepatocyte injury are:

• Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

• Viral hepatitis

• Alcohol, drugs, and herbal remedies

• Haemochromatosis

• Autoimmune disease

Page 18: Points to consider

Cascade of testing following abnormal LFTs

• Tests are requested in

a stepwise fashion

guided by presence of

risk factors and

clinical features

First tier tests

CBC, Fasting glucose &lipids, Iron Studies, HBsAg, HCV

antibody

Second tier tests

Liver ultrasound, autoantibodies, α-1-

antitrypsin

Page 19: Points to consider

Transaminases in general

• < 3 X ULN recheck in 1-3 months

• Two results elevated 3 months apart, investigate further

• > 3 X ULN, Investigate further

AST/ALT ratio• < 1 in most hepatocellular injury

• >1 in alcholic liver diseae, drug induced, malignancy,

cirrohosis

Page 20: Points to consider

Isolated GGT elevation

This has limited use as primary liver test and there is no clear

consensus on follow up. Suggestions are:

– Although non specfic, consider alcohol

– Review risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver

disease.

– Mild rises < 3 X ULN, test three monthly and

consider further investigation if elevation persists or

rises.

– > 5 ULN or both GGT and alkaline phosphatase

raised without explanation - consider ultrasound

Page 21: Points to consider

Cholestasis

Most likely causes of cholestasis include:

• Gall stones

• Abdominal masses

• Medications (erythromycin, phenytoin, flucloxacillin,

amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, combined oral contraceptive pill,

some antipsychotics)

• Pregnancy

• Primary biliary cirrhosis

• Paraneoplasia (especially lymphoma)

• Systemic sepsis

Page 22: Points to consider

A cholestatic pattern of LFT disturbance• ALP and bilirubin usually both elevated

Non-liver causes of ↑ ALP• ALP is non-specific for liver. Other sources are bone,

intestine, and placenta.

• Bony causes include: bony metastases, hyperparathyroidism,

renal impairment, healing fractures and Paget’s disease.

• Other causes : CHF, hyperthyroidism, pregnancy, children

during bone growth, perimenopausal years.

Page 23: Points to consider

Raised alkaline phosphatase plus raised GGT makes liver problem

more likely• ↑ ALP / ↑ GGT = most likely a liver cause

• ↑ ALP / normal GGT = bony cause is more likely

Follow up of ↑ alkaline phosphatase• Depends on the clinical context, other laboratory

abnormalities, and clinical review

• Liver ultrasound if cholestasis is suspected

Page 24: Points to consider

Response to ↑ ALP (when likelihood of disease is low)

ALP level Followup

< 1.5 X ULN •Recheck fasting level in 3 months.

> 1.5 X ULN • 2 measurements taken 3 months apart

warrant further investigation

• exclude malignancy before waiting 3

months

> 3.0 X ULN • Immediate investigation warranted

Page 25: Points to consider

Causes of bilirubin elevation

• Liver disease: usually along with other LFTs

• Isolated ↑ bilirubin: familial hyperbilirubinaemias,

• Haemolysis: ↑ unconjugated bilirubin.

Page 26: Points to consider

Haemolysis may be due to:

• Inherited haemolytic anaemias eg, spherocytosis, thalassaemia

• Immune reactions eg transfusion reaction or haemolytic disease of the

newborn

• Auto-immune disorders eg SLE, RA

• Renal or liver failure

• Drugs and chemicals eg, arsenic, sulphasalazine

• Infections eg, malaria, Clostridium perfringes

• Mechanical eg, valve prosthesis, march haemoglobinuria

• Hypersplenism

• Burns

Page 27: Points to consider

Follow up of elevated bilirubin levels (when no clinical indications of

cause) Bilirubin level Follow up

Up to 1.5 X ULN Retest when well in 3 months

> 1.5 X ULN Test unconjugated portion.

Unconjugated >70% in a well patient with

otherwise normal LFTs, CBC and TSH =

most likely to be Gilberts Syndrome

> 3.0 X ULN Unconjugated >70% consider haemolysis

Conjugated >50% consider ultrasound

Page 28: Points to consider

Liver failure: reflected in serum albumin and INR

• Failure of the liver to perform its synthetic functions is most often

related to loss of functioning liver mass. It is usually assessed by

levels of serum albumin and coagulation factors,

• Failure of the liver to synthesise albumin results in albumin.

albumin may be due to: cachexia, catabolic states, such as sepsis

and cancer, nephrotic syndrome and protein-losing enteropathy.

• ↑ INR may be due to synthesis of clotting factors

• Vitamin K malabsorption may ↑ INR

• Failure of liver synthetic function = severe liver disease

Page 29: Points to consider

People who require specialist referral for disturbed liver

function • HBsAg positive, ALT > ULN for at least 6. AFP is >100 =

should be seen urgently.

• Hepatitis C positive

• Evidence of acute or chronic failure of liver synthetic

function.

• Haemochromatosis positive with abnormal LFTs,

hepatomegaly or untreated ferritin > 1000 g/L.

• Anyone with persisting unexplained LFT abnormalities.

Page 30: Points to consider

Management of acute hepatitis Common causes of acute hepatitis are:

– Hepatitis A: contaminated food, men who have sex with men

• <1% develop chronic autoimmune hepatitis

– Hepatitis B: adult infection – sexual, intra-venous drug use

• Acute hepatitis B is unlikely in adults of Maori, Pacific or Asian ethnicity

(Likely to be immune or chronically infected due to infection at an early

age)

• < 5% of adults develop chronic infection

– Hepatitis C: adult infection, intra-venous drug use

• >80% develop chronic hepatitis

– Epstein-Barr viral hepatitis: usually adolescent (infectious mononucleosis)

• None develop chronic hepatitis

Page 31: Points to consider

Monitoring in acute hepatitis

Monitoring for acute hepatitis managed at home

includes twice weekly testing of:

ALT, AST, INR, bilirubin, creatinine, glucose

Testing frequency is decreased as the results

return to normal.

Page 32: Points to consider

Liver function testing not indicated in infectious

mononucleosis

• Liver function testing is rarely indicated in IM

• IM does not lead to chronic liver disease

• LFT results do not alter management

• Test LFTs only if patient becomes jaundice

Page 33: Points to consider

Fatty liver (steatohepatitis)

• Fatty liver is associated with alcoholic liver disease but non-

alcoholic causes are becoming increasingly common.

• NAFLD often has ↑AST/ALT.

• 10-15% of people with NAFLD will develop long term scarring.

• NAFLD associated with metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance,

diabetes, and hyperlipidaemia.

• LFTs especially indicated for people at risk of fibrosis or

progression.

Page 34: Points to consider

Liver metastases

• Monitoring of LFTs is not routinely indicated for people with

cancer as it is rare to get liver failure from liver metastases.

Biliary obstruction may occur but leads rapidly to jaundice.

• Monitoring of LFTs is worthwhile for people on

chemotherapy.

Page 35: Points to consider

Gilbert’s syndrome

• Gilbert’s syndrome is asymptomatic and it is not a serious

disease.

• Occurs 2-10% of the population.

• Mostly unconjugated bilirubin and levels fluctuate, often

higher at times of illness and fasting.

• No proven association between tiredness and Gilbert’s

syndrome.

• No risk of kernicterus to the foetus.

Page 36: Points to consider

Appendix 1 - Liver function tests

• ALT • AST • GGT • ALP • Bilirubin • Total protein • Albumin • INR

Page 37: Points to consider

Appendix 2 – Alcohol screening tests

1. The RAPS4 Alcohol Screening Test for dependent drinking

Please answer these 4 questions:

• During the last year have you had a feeling of guilt or remorse

after drinking?

• During the last year has a friend or a family member ever told you

about things you said or did while you were drinking that you

could not remember?

• During the last year have you failed to do what was normally

expected from you because of drinking?

• Do you sometime take a drink when you first get up in the

morning?

Page 38: Points to consider

Appendix 2 – Alcohol screening tests …contd

2. Alcohol Advisory Council of

New Zealand ‘Drink Check’

The ALAC drinkcheck

questionnaire, based on the

AUDIT tool, is available online

from ALAC:

http://www.alac.org.nz/TestYour

Drinking.aspx

Page 39: Points to consider

Appendix 3 - Screening for hepatitis B in people not

previously immune HBsAg

Negative Positive

No evidence of Hepatitis B infection

If positive for > 6 months, consistent with chronic Hepatitis B infection

Page 40: Points to consider

Appendix 3 - Investigation for Evidence of Previous Infection or Immunisation

with Hepatitis B – See footnote (a)

a. A previous vaccination with documented immune response, the patient can then be presumed to be protected long term unless they are immunosuppressed. If in doubt revaccinate and recheck anti-HBs in 3 weeks.

b. A small number of patients may be positive for anti-HBc from a previous HBV infection in the absence of anti-HBs. If there is a strong suspicion of previous infection or high risk, then order an anti-HBc.

Anti-HBs

Compatible with previous infection or immunisation

No evidence of previous infection or immunizationSee footnote(b)

PositiveNegative

Page 41: Points to consider

Appendix 4: Investigation for Evidence of Chronic HCV Infection

a. A negative test does not exclude infection within the previous eight weeks. b. Positive anti-HCV is followed up by HCV RNA tests. Persistently normal LFTs and two

negative HCV RNA tests 3 months apart indicate that active HCV is extremely unlikely.

Anti-HCV

No evidence of chronic Hepatitis C infectionSee footnote (a)

Indicates possible current, previous or chronic Hepatitis C infectionSee footnote (b)

Negative Positive

Page 42: Points to consider

Appendix 5 – Isoenzymes

Isoenzymes are different molecular forms of the same enzyme,

which all react in a similar manner with a laboratory test.

• ALP isoenzymes may originate from liver, bone, placenta, intestinal or

tumour cells.

• ALT is the most specific liver enzyme, but occasionally originates from

sources other than the liver.

• AST may originate from liver, heart or red blood cells.

• GGT isoenzymes have been identified in kidney, heart and pancreas but

these are not commonly encountered.

Page 43: Points to consider

Appendix 6Investigation for Evidence of Acute Viral Hepatitis8

a. Hepatitis C cannot reliably be diagnosed in the acute phase because of the prolonged period of sero-conversion. Testing may be done for people with known risk factors. However, if HCV is negative and other causes of viral hepatitis have been ruled out, a second sample should be specifically tested for HCV one to three months later.

b. If HBsAg is positive for a period of greater than six months, it is consistent with chronic Hepatitis B infection.

ALTElevated > 5 x ULN

Hepatitis AHepatitis B

Anti-HAV IgM

No evidence of acute Hepatitis A infection

Compatible with acute Hepatitis A infection

Negative Positive

Hepatitis CSee footnote (a)

HBsAg

Negative Positive

Anti-HBc IgM

PositiveCompatible with acute or chronic hepatitis B infectionSee footnote (b)

Compatible with acute Hepatitis B infection

No evidence of acute Hepatitis B infection

Positive

Page 44: Points to consider

References1. BPAC, Laboratory Testing in Diabetes, 2006

2. Sleisenger and Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease 8th ed, Chapter 83 pages 1807-1852 “Liver Disease Caused by Drugs”

3. Law M, Rudnicka AR. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:52C-60C

4. Maddrey W. Drug-Induced Liver Disease: 2006 The risk profile of statins. Slide Show Presentation: AASLD 2006

5. Evaluation and Interpretation of Abnormal Liver Chemistry in Adults, BC Health services 2004

6. Giannini EG, Testa R, Savarino V. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. CMAJ 2005; 172:367-79.

7. Smellie WS, Forth J, Ryder S. Best practice in primary care pathology: review 5. J Clin Path 2006;59:1229-37.

8. OAML Guidelines for Clinical Laboratory Practice. CLP 012: Guidelines for Testing for Viral Hepatitis. Available from: http://www.oaml.ca/PDF/CLP012.pdf (accessed 21 June 2007)

9. Alcohol Advisory Council of New Zealand, ‘Drink Check’ Is your drinking OK?, Available from: http://www.alac.org.nz/Documents/Campaigns/ALAC_DrinkCheck.pdf (accessed 21 June 2007)