8/3/2019 Pms 2011 @ Scan Copy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/pms-2011-scan-copy 1/4

&,nrx

PMS Form 2011

Name of Appraise: SATYANARAYAN pRASAD

Department CUSTOMER SUppORT

Designation/ Level: ASST. ENGINEER

Datei 14-12-2011

Name ofAppraiser/s; Mr. MITHUN HALDER

Enclose the print out of filled-in lpC for the year 20j 1 from eKpl application or Kpl ExcelFormat

.tobe filled by appraisee

Commentslndividual: As per my capability and experience , I filled my Kpt and pN,4S.

Reviewer/sl

DeAAel HR . . . . . Makihs .tinar'dce to the Reat wort.t ot ou. orsanization

2011 KPt tPc (100%) V&C (optional)lndividual Evaluation yf tvl .score- 120Boss Evaluation YTI\,,I Score

8/3/2019 Pms 2011 @ Scan Copy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/pms-2011-scan-copy 2/4

A1af n FLTd

Questionnaire

To be filledbythe Appraisee and submitted to the Appraiser/ Reporting Manager 2 days before theReview Discussion. appraiserto tick on the relevant option once reviewed.(pls attach additionalsheets

if required)

(j Com pletely Agree (: Partially Agree

[) oisagree

1. During this review period (.la n ,Dec 2011) what went well? What were your achtevementslot down vour r€asons for su.cFss

1.TTSL ODC Project Completed properlv.

7. TowerVrs.on sirF'a Auronatior & Reworn

3. Viom solar site in Bihar & lharkhand Automation with RMS.

4. Over all year achieved 5LA 84%

2. During this year, what could have been better? What did not go well? Ment on your reasons for thisdisaooointment or fa il! re

[.- com pletely ngree [j PartiallyAgree

3. What has been yoLrr learning during thls

fl otsagre e

pe.iod? How do you plan to utilize this learning next year?

1. IPMS, SIVICS &Solar Site lea.ning this period and ffom this product want to utj ize field work.

Appraiserviews:

D com pletely ngree f: Partially ACree

rt do you require from

e completely Agree Epartiallyqgree Cotsagree

5. During theyear

haveyou

been Guided or Counseled by your reporiin€ Manager. Mention 12 instanceswhen such guidance has inspired you.

Yes/ No NO

How many tjmes-

Appraisers comments(if any)i

Sign ofAppraiser:

6 t" o" a"a w"aa.r.

uire regular update & extra support required

8/3/2019 Pms 2011 @ Scan Copy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/pms-2011-scan-copy 3/4

&,xl:a

Critical Success Attributes -(Ratings: 1-Need lmprovement, 2- Average, 3- Good, 4- Very cood, s-OuGtanding)

Training Need ldentification: (Appraiser & Appraisee needs to fill the areas on

the Excel sheet attached)

Sign ofAppr€iser

iretlt€r HB . . . . - Maktns crfference tu

Attributes RatingSubstantiate

rating withReference

Appraisee Appraiser1. Currentjob responsibilily rnalches with currentskilJ sets Yes/No/Paftially

Parliallv2. Has Poteniialto lake up additionalroles &rcsponsibilities

YES

3. Job Proportion in %Rouhne job

90

10

4. Leadership skills:- LAb lty ro l-andle tean.

mature & balanced in decision making)Rating (1-5)

4

5. Convincing skills- (Abiliiy to satjsfyinternal/external customerc queries effectively)

Ratjnq (1-5):

6. Contlict Resolution:- (Ability to go to the rootcause & find a long ierm solution)

Rating (1-5)

7. Dependability & Result Orientation:-(Dependable and owns the task assigned)

Raling (1-s):

L Team Work:- (Accepted & respected by team.Demonstrates understandlng & sensitivity to crossfunctional dependencies, Can mentor juniors andshare knowledge)

Rating (1-5):

9. Takes lnitiatives:- (make extra efforis/initjalivesto fulfill tasks/goals)

Raiing (1-5):4

1 0. Customer(intemal/external) focus! (strive fortherr satjsfaction) Rating (1-5)i

4

8/3/2019 Pms 2011 @ Scan Copy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/pms-2011-scan-copy 4/4

-^1.1r I\'El ],a

Guidelines for performance Review

lnterpretation of Overall Category Rating:

Category A: Outstanding performanceCategory B: V.Good PerformanceCategory Ci Good Performance

Category D&E: Average performance & Needs lmprovement

Normalization (A bellcurve): Forced Ranking MethodOverallCategory Rating as per the Appraiser. kindly followforced ranktng method given in cuidelines:

P

t

1

ltt

ll

No .f'leam a*"mber6 -----t

All the Line Managers are requested to follow the same normalization pattern so that evaluation isdone as per the performance standards and justify the outcome in term; of quantitative results.

Q!.ri!a Htrl Makinq .tifference to the Rear wo d of ouf o.ganizanon