Platou Report

1

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

THE PLATOU REPORT2015

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

1 2 0

1 4 0

RE

AL

20

13

US

D P

ER

BB

L,

AN

NU

AL

AV

G.

1 0 4 . 1 21 9 8 0

1 8 . 1 71 9 9 8

1 1 5 . 2 22 0 1 1

5 52 0 1 5

( F E B )

1 0 . 7 91 9 7 0

THE PLATOU REPORT 2015

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

05

07

12

14

19

23

25

26

27

28

30

34

38

42

44

46

49

56

INTRODUCTION

THE SHIPPING MARKET ENVIRONMENT

TONNAGE SURPLUS:A COMPLICATED EXERCISE

THE TANKER MARKET

THE DRY BULK MARKET

THE CONTAINER SHIP MARKET

THE CAR CARRIER MARKET

THE LNG SHIPPING MARKET

SMALL SCALE LNG MARKET

THE LPG SHIPPING MARKET

THE SHIPBUILDING MARKET

MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS

THE OFFSHORE SUPPORT VESSEL (OSV) MARKET

RS PLATOU MARKETS

RS PLATOU PROJECT FINANCE

RS PLATOU REAL ESTATE

STATISTICS

CONTACTS

THE WORLD ACCORDING TO RS PLATOU


4 5

THE PLATOU REPORT 2015 INTRODUCTION

A NEW BEGINNING: PLATOU JOINS FORCES WITH CLARKSONSRagnar Stoud Platou was born in Hamar, next to Norway’s largest freshwater lake, in 1897.

In 1915 he started as a shipbroker apprentice and in 1936 he founded RS Platou. Over the next decades, RS Platou continued to grow in global reach, number of employees and revenues.

RS Platou first engaged in a couple of joint ventures with H. Clarksons in Canada and Australia, going on to work closely together through the 60s and 70s.

Clarksons weathered the shipping crisis in the 70s and 80s better than Platou, which saw its position in the world of shipping significantly reduced by the mid 80s. However, the firm’s activity in Offshore continued to thrive.

In 1987 the families that owned Platou encouraged a manage-ment buyout, whereby they transferred 75 percent of the company to existing employees and guaranteed the operating cost for two years. The timing for this new group of shareholders turned out to be very good, as shipping had reached a fundamental turning point in 1987, after 13 years of structurally weak shipping markets.

During the next 27 years, Platou’s revenue grew from about 6 mill USD to approximately 200 mill USD as our Shipbroking acti vity recovered, Offshore continued to thrive, and the company made a profitable expansion into Project Finance & Investment Banking.

However, we in Platou realized we would not be able to grow our Shipbroking activity to become a truly global player organically. As such we are now very pleased to join forces with Clarksons, the strongest player in the world of Shipbroking.

Clarksons and Platou will continue to work hard to develop our services, and look forward to your continued support in the years to come.

Yours Faithfully,PETER M. ANKER

Managing Partner & CEO (1987–2015)RS Platou ASA


6 7


T H E S H I P P I N G M A R K E T E N V I R O N M E N T

WORLD SHIPPING 2014: DEEPENING DIVERGENCESA year ago we envisioned a scenario where 2014 would be ‘The Recovery Year’ for global shipping markets, as an improving world economy boosted tonnage demand, while fleet growth continued to slow to more sustainable levels. We were only partially right, as once again the world economy failed to live up to its recovery billing. World fleet capacity utilization was unchanged for the year, but in the absence of a strong world economy there were bigger divergences between segments than in the recent past. The LPG and tanker markets were the year’s clear winners, while the dry bulk market emerged as the clear loser.

A YEAR OF CRISES, BUT NO CRISIS…As in recent years, geopolitical crises again made the headlines. However, this year’s crises had little direct impact on shipping. Russia’s annexation of Crimea and hostilities towards Ukraine did not interfere with any trade flows, and the West’s retaliation measures, while broadly based, meticulously avoided Russia’s on-going energy production and trade. The emergence of the ISIL terror force was shocking in its suddenness and brutality, but it made no impact on oil production and trade.

… LEAVING THE WARS TO THE MARKETInstead, it was a year in which market volatility was driven more by endogenous, industry-specific factors. In the oil market, the war that did break out was the one between Saudi Arabia and US shale oil producers, which caused the oil price to end the year in a vir-tual free fall. The upshot for shipping was a surge in long-haul LPG shipments, as soaring US energy production continues to look for new markets. The global oil trade had a very strong finish to the year as crude oil producers kept pumping and refiners pounced on the sharp drop in input costs to step up production. Both events resulted in more cargo volume looking for tonnage to move it. On the dry bulk side, Chinese authorities accelerated their shifts in energy policy away from coal, and, helped by stronger perfor-

mances from other energy sources, caused the first decline in the country’s coal use ‘on record’. Indonesian politicians, meanwhile, decided that it was not in the country’s best interests to continue exporting bauxite and nickel ore. In combination, these initiatives caused trade growth in dry bulk to record its slowest growth since the Financial Crisis.

MARKET VOLATILITY CONFIRMS TALES OF STRUCTURAL OVERCAPACITY WERE EXAGGERATEDIt was a year in which all segments experienced considerable intra-year volatility in freight rates, irrespective of the outcome for the annual averages. As commented on last year, this very volatility argues against the notion that freight markets have become struc-turally over-tonnaged. Nevertheless, there is little doubt that the combination of the Financial Crisis and the largest orderbook in thirty years did create a surplus of tonnage. However, the mecha-nisms of absorbing this surplus – slow steaming and waiting days, as opposed to lay-up – have been different than in the past. With bunker prices crashing down and freight rates for many, but not all, segments going up, the industry is about to find out just how much (over-) capacity there is. For a detailed discussion of this issue and its complex dynamics, please see page 12.


8 9

TANKERS IN 2014: STRONG START, STRONGER FINISHThe tanker market very closely mirrored 2013’s performance, with sinking trade volumes pressuring freight rates for much of the year before a spectacular year-end turnaround. The difference this time was that the upswing was much broader as it also included the clean market. All of these factors reflect stronger underlying fundamen-tals. While trade trends showed similar declines in the first half of the year, 2014’s turnaround was more pronounced, spurred by the sharp drop in oil prices. We estimate that trade volume declined by less than 1 percent for the year, again recovering strongly late in the year. A marked lengthening of trading distances caused ton-miles to increase by more than 2 percent, compared to zero growth for this metric in 2013. Total tonnage demand, including estimated changes in productivity, rose by more than 4 percent.

With fleet growth slowing sharply to 2 percent, the slowest rate in more than a decade, capacity utilization increased by nearly two percentage points to 85 percent, the highest level since 2010.

DRY BULK: BELOW EXPECTATIONS DUE TO WEAKER TONNAGE DEMAND GROWTHEarnings for dry bulk ships were on average lower in 2014 than the year before. Preliminary assessments suggest tonnage demand increased slightly above 4 percent. This was lower than anticipated and largely caused by a strong drop in Chinese coal, bauxite and nickel ore imports. The size of the fleet increased 5 percent. The fleet utilization rate thereby decreased by around 1 percentage point.

For the full year, our weighted dry bulk index fell from $12,800 per day in 2013, to $11,500 per day, a drop of 10 percent. The largest decrease came in the Panamax sector, where average earnings decreased from $9,500 per day in 2013 to $7,700 in 2014, a slide of 19 percent. Capesizes obtained $14,800 per day against $16,600 the year before. For Supramax tonnage, freight rates decreased from $10,300 per day to $9,800, while the Handy sector daily earnings eroded from $8,700 to $7,700.

LNG MARKET The LNG shipping market finally witnessed growth in seaborne trade, following two years of decline. However, due to a continued fall in transport distance and improved productivity in the fleet,

total shipping demand remained unchanged. The LNG carrier fleet grew by 5 percent, resulting in a weakening in the fleet’s utilization rate of equal magnitude and a lowering of the short-term charter rates by 40–45 percent. On average, a modern steam turbine ship earned $54,500 per day, while a ship equipped with dual-fuelled propulsion received $10,000 more per day.

LPG: BEATING HIGH EXPECTATIONSRecord high rates for the larger LPG carriers were seen during 2014. Driven by a massive expansion of exports from the USA and healthy Middle East exports – and despite a contraction in the ammonia seaborne trade – we have estimated that total shipping demand for LPG and ammonia climbed by 16 percent during 2014. Combined with 6 percent fleet growth, the utilization rate ascended by 10 per-centage points and reached an all-time-high of 99 percent. This resulted in a two-fold increase in average spot earnings for VLGCs, at $68,000 per day. The hike in spot rates were less pronounced for the smaller ships; a Midsize LPG carrier earned on average 17 per-cent more in 2014, at $32,000 per day.

CAR CARRIERS: LOCAL PRODUCTION CUTS INTO SEABORNE TRADE2014 was a disappointing year for the car carrier industry. Despite growing auto sales in the major markets, demand for tonnage has been at a standstill, with most of the increased demand for cars covered by local production instead of imports. Sales in emerging markets are in decline and this impacts negatively on seaborne volumes, as local vehicle production is scarce. As the fleet is constantly growing, it means that oversupply of tonnage increased to 6–7 percent during the year. Consequently, rate levels also declined from the year before. Expectations for 2015 are that demand will return to growth, but only to a level on par with fore-casted fleet growth, meaning that rate levels will remain well below breakeven for most vessels.

WORLD ECONOMY AND WORLD SHIPPINGTo the surprise of many analysts, including ourselves, the world economy in 2014 stuck to its established disappointing pattern. 2013 had ended on a strong note, with US growth accelerating and

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Tonnage demand growth, world merchant fleet, annual change in percent

World output growth, percent

02

03 04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12 13

14

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Percent

TONNAGE DEMAND GROWTH VS WORLD ECONOMIC GROWTH 2002–2014

WORLD MERCHANT FLEET 2005–2014ANNUAL CHANGES

signs of encouragement in China, as well as Europe. Neverthe-less, renewed headwinds emerged quickly in the New Year from familiar as well as new fronts and an all-too familiar pattern of growth markdowns began. An equally familiar development, how-ever, was the continued supportive policies of central banks, with both Chinese and European authorities moving to ease policy. The price of oil also was in focus, as usual. Contrary to previous years, in which spiking prices have been a threat to growth, plunging prices were seen as a tax cut to consuming countries. Consequently, there were once again some signs of encouragement as the year ended, led by surging growth in the US.

GROWTH MOMENTUM BROKEN, AGAIN, DURING THE FIRST HALF …The first half slowdown was most acute in the US, where growth went from being seemingly robust in the second half of 2013 and straight into contraction during the first quarter. However, it soon became apparent that the slowdown was weather related. Ameri-cans endured one of their harshest winters in years, causing severe disruptions in economic activity throughout the country. Chinese growth remained uneven, with ongoing weakness in domestic investment and infrastructure, a mixed performance on trade, but still relatively strong private consumption, continuing the pattern since 2013. Europe’s economies, while technically not in recession, still failed to maintain what little momentum they had due to ongoing tight public sector budgets and fragmented balance sheets. The region was also the hardest hit by the rise in geopolitical tensions resulting from the Russia–Ukraine conflict. In Japan,

‘Abenomics’ stumbled in the wake of the increase in the consump-tion tax in the spring. With growth weakening in the big economies it was no surprise that many emerging markets suffered; as their exports took a hit, while financing remained tighter than earlier following the reversal of capital flows that had begun in 2013.

These developments resulted in the IMF marking down its 2014 world GDP growth projection by a hefty 0.4 percentage points to 3.3 percent, in line with the weak pace of 2013.

…BUT U.S. UPSWING SHEDS SOME LIGHT ON THE SECOND HALFAs soon as the weather related headwinds receded, the US economy’s stronger underlying momentum resurfaced. The Amer-ican economy is reaping the tailwinds of having tackled the Finan-cial Crisis more aggressively, which has improved balance sheets all around. In addition, the fiscal drag that held the economy back in 2012 and 2013 is now fading. As a result, the economy rebounded forcefully with growth averaging 4.5 percent during the second and third quarters.

A hard landing in China was the big fear for markets going into 2014. However, authorities continued the investment-led downturn in the property sector by pro-actively deploying growth support measures such as fiscal stimulus, although at a much smaller scale than in the past, alongside tax breaks and interest rate cuts. As a result, the growth remained near the government’s 7.5 percent target through the year, with an improvement in exports lending support during the second half of 2014. However, growth remained lackluster in the rest of the world. Emerging markets have been suffering from weaker external demand conditions for some time. The downturn in commodity prices, which began during the summer, further added to these problems, particularly for countries in Latin America and for Russia. The latter was obviously at the epicenter of rising geo-political tensions resulting from its aggression against Ukraine, and economic sanctions began to bite during the second half of the year. For Europe and Japan, the second half was as weak as the first – even weaker in Japan’s case,as private consumption failed to recover from the spring tax hike. The slowdown in China, combined with a down-turn and financial instability in Russia, hit the European manufactur-ing sector and once again cast doubts on its banking system.

2015: FROM DIVERGENCE TO CONVERGENCE?The outlook for 2015 is eerily familiar to that of 2014, 2013 etc., with the opinion being that “growth has been held back by legacies of the Financial Crisis – but should pick up next year.” Indeed, no sooner had the year started before there was another markdown of growth


10 11

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Index 1970=100

Seaborne oil trade Seaborne dry trade World output


expectations by the IMF, this time by 0.3 percentage points. The difference from recent years is the emergence of the US as a clear growth leader. The American economy has gained momentum as growth has begun to impact upon the labor market, with consist-ent job gains and a decline in the unemployment rate during the year. 2015 will also reap the full benefits of the plunge in oil prices, although the substantial increase in energy investment and produc-tion seen in recent years is expected to take a significant hit in the wake of the oil price plunge and will offset some of the income gains from lower oil prices.

The strength of the US economy means improved external conditions for its main trading partners, including China, which will also benefit from sharply lower energy prices. We expect the government to continue to provide growth supportive measures, while the long-term trend toward urbanization and the transition away from agriculture and towards manufacturing and services will continue. The Chinese labor market appears to be on solid footing, with wage gains supporting strong growth in consumer spending. As a result we expect growth in China to remain above 7 percent.

With the world’s two biggest economies seeing a stronger advance in 2015, the external environment for other econo-mies should improve. Emerging economies, which are the main drivers of tonnage demand, should benefit from these trends. Growth support is needed as the sharp downturn in commodity prices is hurting energy producers in the Middle East, Latin America and Russia, although the strength of the US dollar is offsetting some of that headwind.

Europe and Japan may still be the biggest downside risks. The former continues to struggle with its banking system and shrink-ing credit growth, while the troubles of Russia have added another layer of complexity. A more competitive Euro and a likely more radical stance on monetary policy should be positive contributors to growth. The situation remains fragile, however, as evidenced by the market reactions to changes in Greek politics.

Overall, we still remain cautiously optimistic that global growth will emerge from the sluggish levels of recent years, aided by the sharp drop in commodity prices, in addition to continued stimulative eco-nomic policies. Propelled by these forces, the world economy should

start moving towards its 4 percent trend rate for the first time since 2010 – a development that would be good news for tonnage demand in all segments.

SHIPPING MARKET PROSPECTS: A NEW WAVE, BUT UNLIKELY TO LIFT ALL VESSELS Commodity shipping markets have been affected to roughly the same extent by two macro trends since the Financial Crisis; a weak world economy and above-trend fleet growth. The effects of the late 2000s newbuilding spike are now fading, while some of the seeds sown by the commodity price bubble in the same period are blossoming and transforming production and trade patterns. These changes are likely to mean that we are entering a period of less syn-chronized shipping market cycles than in the recent past.

The tanker market is a case in point. The freight market collapse in recent years was almost exclusively attributed to the US shale oil revolution and the subsequent decline in oil imports. Sharply lower rates, combined with a pervasively negative market sentiment, hit ordering of new vessels. The result is that the market is now facing a new upswing in the oil trades on the back of the lowest orderbook in more than a decade. A further improvement in fleet utilization thus looks highly likely. Unfortunately the dry bulk market is at the other end of the spectrum. Ordering of new vessels rebounded quickly after the Financial Crisis, driven by market optimism on China, and fleet growth has thus remained stubbornly high. Mean-while, the forces shaping the commodity appetite of the market’s biggest customer, China, are changing. The country’s growth rate has slowed and composition shifted, while the pressure for more environmentally friendly energy use has intensified. The result is a downshift in the growth rate of dry bulk trade amid persistently high fleet growth.

The outlook for 2015 thus remains one of cautious optimism for shipping overall, but with a much broader range of expected out-comes than usual for the individual segments. We expect tankers and LPG to continue to outperform. Both market segments are beneficiaries of strong growth in world oil production which in turn is supporting strong trade growth. The challenge now is for growth to pick up in order to absorb surging production.

WORLD SEABORNE TRADE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH1970–2014

ANNUAL GROWTH IN REAL GDPPERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS YEAR

Source: IMF

2 0 1 4 F O R E C A S T 2 0 1 4 A C T U A L 2 0 1 5 F O R E C A S T

USA 2.8 2.4 3.6

Japan 1.7 0.1 0.6

Euro area 1.0 0.8 1.2

C. and E. Europe 2.8 2.7 2.9

Russia 2.0 0.6 -3.0

China 7.5 7.4 6.8

India 5.4 5.8 6.3

ASEAN-5 5.1 4.5 5.2

M. East and N. Africa 3.3 2.8 3.3

Sub-Saharan Africa 6.1 4.8 4.9

L. America 3.0 1.2 1.3

World 3.7 3.3 3.5

Dry bulk will likely remain a laggard. Fleet growth will remain high for the foreseeable future, while lower Chinese coal consump-tion and ongoing support for its domestic coal and iron ore mining industries means lower-than-normal trade growth.

The LNG market is expected to begin a cyclical upturn in response to increased production capacity, which will generate more trade. The car carrier market is expected to remain static.

Global shipping is entering a new period of fragmentation in which new trends in commodity demand and production are reshaping trade lanes. Orderbook levels have also become much more differentiated, as access to financing has become increasingly

selective. It is thus no longer possible to talk about the outlook. 2015 has all the signs of being a mixed year for the markets overall, but with a much clearer distinction between winners and losers than in the past.

OLE-RIKARD HAMMERHead of Research

RS Platou Economic Research


GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH 2005–2015FORECASTS AND ACTUAL GROWTH RATES

SUPPLY, DEMAND AND UTILIZATION RATE 1990–2014WORLD MERCHANT FLEET

70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Utilization rate (%)Mill cgt

Supply Demand Utilization rate

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

Percent change

Source: IMF (forecast per Oct. the year before)Forecast Actual

12 13

TONNAGE SURPLUS: A COMPLICATED EXERCISEAN ENIGMA: The tanker fleet has increased by 50 percent since 2005 (a year with balanced market conditions); seaborne oil trade has increased by 5 percent. How big is the tonnage surplus?

Our estimate for 2014 is 5 percent. How could that be possible?This simple comparison between the fleet growth and the

growth in trade volumes does not tell the whole story. There are a number of additional factors. Measuring overcapacity in shipping markets is a complicated exercise that could be done in many different ways. In the good old days, with very low bunker prices, estimating overcapacity was simple; just count the number of laid up vessels. Either the vessels were sailing at full speed or they were laid up. Today most of the overcapacity is in the form of slow steaming, definitely a much more complicated element to handle. Let us start by establishing some basic principles.

First of all we must distinguish between technical overcapacity and economical overcapacity. For the sake of simplicity we will con-strain ourselves to VLCCs. An example: Let’s say that the current speed is 11 knots and that the technical maximum speed is 15 knots. Based on an AG/Korea trade the annual transport capacity for a VLCC is 1.91 mill tons at 11 knots and 2.54 mill tons at 15 knots, implying a technical overcapacity of 25 percent.

However, we regard economical overcapacity to be a much more relevant concept. RS Platou Economic Research has defined 90 percent (quite arbitrarily) as full capacity utilization, correspond-ing with a freight rate giving 8 percent return on total capital based on reasonable assumptions on the price of the vessel, its economic

life, operating cost etc. At the end of 2014 this leads us to roughly $40,000 per day, with an optimum speed of 13 knots at a bunker price of $400 ton per ton in our VLCC example. This points to an annual transport capacity of 2.23 mill tons or 12 percent less than at maximum speed.

Normal productivity for the fleet can be defined as the number of ton-miles produced per deadweight ton per year at a 90 percent utilization rate. Since our goal is to measure tonnage surplus we have to differentiate between market-dependent changes in produc-tivity and structural changes. To illustrate: In a weakening market operators want to reduce the speed because optimum speed is falling. This results in a market-dependent decline in productivity, which is a part of the overcapacity to be measured. An increase in bunker prices is normally also lead to lower speed, but we regard this as a structural drop in productivity. In other words, an increase in bunker prices at a constant rate level will lead to slower speed and the need for more tankers to carry out the same transportation work.

Let us take a look at the other productivity factors in addition to speed:

Transport distances have played an important role in the years since 2005. According to our estimates average tanker distances have increased by 12 percent, resulting in a rise of 17 percent in ton-mile numbers over the last nine years. We regard this as a structural


trend, not a function of market cycles.Floating storage. Over the period from 2005 to 2014 there were

several years with a significant use of tankers for storage purposes, in addition to their traditional trading employment. A peak was reached in November 2009, when roughly 7 percent of the tanker fleet was utilized for oil storage. The current crude oil oversupply may again lead to a new floating storage surge in 2015.

Another structural element is the load factor, defined as the cargo size divided by the deadweight tonnage of the vessel. There has been a consistent trend over many years towards larger Aframaxes, Suezmaxes and VLCCs, while cargo sizes have remained more or less unchanged. This means that we need more deadweight tons to take the same cargo as before, reducing the productivity by some 5–6 percent since 2005.

Port days. The number of port days per year could fluctuate significantly over time, partly due to market cycles (market-depend-ent congestion), partly due to structural factors, such as changes in global trading pattern and vessel size distribution.

The ballast factor describes the share of days in ballast compared with the total days at sea. Significant and rapid changes in the world-wide trade pattern normally lead to more repositioning of the fleet, more ballast days and consequently lower structural productivity.

Then back to speed again. The sharp drop in bunker prices after September 2014 should have led to a strong rise in structural speed in addition to higher speed driven by improved market conditions. We have actually observed an increased speed, but considerably lower than the optimum level in mid-January 2015. There are several possible explanations behind this, such as charterers’ requirements, different speed optimization for oil company tonnage and not least that the net-income curve per day as a function of speed is very flat between 11 and 15 knots at $300 bunker prices. Nothing wrong with this, tonnage surplus calculations have to be theoretical.

To sum up: From 2005 to 2014 the structural productivity of the tanker fleet has fallen by 16 percent, contributing to a 43 per-cent growth in tonnage demand. The consequence has been a fall in the utilization rate from 90 percent in 2005 to 85 percent in 2014, despite the 50 percent fleet growth.

ERIK M. ANDERSENSpecial Adviser


TONNAGE SURPLUS: A COMPLICATED EXERCISE


14 15

T H E TA N K E R M A R K E T

A WELL-OILED RECOVERY2014 turned out to be quite a good year for tanker owners with capacity utilization and freight rates improving, very much in line with our forecast. While this improvement was partly due to a sharp slowdown in fleet growth, this was the easy part of the prognosis given the low orderbook. It was the demand side of the market that again offered surprises, and the combination of drivers was somewhat different than expected.

We had foreseen that this would be the year the world economy and oil demand finally began to recover after several false starts. On the contrary, however, it turned out to be yet another year of sluggishness. While such a development is normally not good news for tanker demand, the big surprise was that OPEC (Saudi Arabia) decided along the way to change its strategy in favor of maintain-ing market share rather than supporting prices by reducing volume. The unrestrained increase in world oil production was very bene-ficial to tanker demand, which improved significantly during the second half of the year, as rapidly rising output of crude oil, as well as refined products, needed more tonnage to move it. Cheaper oil also meant longer trading distances, as the US shale revolution pres-sured more Atlantic basin cargoes towards Asia. With fleet growth virtually stagnant, fleet utilization was boosted above the 85 percent

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

$1,000 per day

Aframax Suezmax VLCC

FREIGHT RATES – SINGLE VOYAGE 2005–2014CRUDE CARRIERS

AVERAGE FREIGHT RATES $1,000 PER DAYSINGLE VOYAGE

2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4

VLCC 20.9 17.6 29.2

Suezmax 14.7 14.1 26.1

Aframax 15.4 16.3 23.2

LR2 product 14.3 13.5 18.7

MR product 13.0 16.3 11.5

mark, tipping pricing power back to owners and resulting in signif-icant rate gains during the last four months of the year. Importantly, the increases were much more broadly based than in 2013, indicat-ing a stronger base.

THE CLEAN MARKET: LIFE, AT LASTThe clean market took part in that strong finish, unlike last year. This obviously represented a highly welcome trend shift, as this segment had been underperforming the rest of the market, not to mention its own lofty expectations, for the past year. The drivers of the upturn were much the same as for crude. The world’s refin-ing sector is in a period of rapid capacity growth and the plunge in crude prices had an immediate positive effect on refiners’ margins via lower input costs, encouraging them to increase utilization. All of the world’s refinery export hubs were thus humming in synchro-nized fashion during the second half of the year, driving up tonnage demand. While fleet growth remains significantly higher for clean tankers, so does tonnage demand intensity – i.e. how much tonnage is needed when factoring in such productivity factors as longer waiting times in port, and multi-porting.

FREIGHT RATES: ACROSS-THE-BOARD GAINS FOR CRUDE, MIXED FOR CLEANFreight rose across-the-board and despite a steep second quarter slump still improved significantly for all segments for the year. Our tonnage-weighted rate index came in at close to $24,000 per day. This was the highest level in four years and represented a solid 44 percent gain on 2013.

Crude tankers were led by a hefty 84 percent increase for Suez-maxes, averaging $26,000 per day. VLCCs, as usual, saw the highest average, coming close to breaking the $30,000 per day barriers for the first time since 2010, but finished at $29,000 per day. The clean segment was much more mixed. MRs struggled for the first nine months and ended the year 30 percent lower on theoretical voyage returns at $12,000 per day. Actual trading results will vary, however, depending on the number of paid trading days accomplished. LR 1s were little changed at $16,000 per day, while LR 2s had an excellent year with an average increase of more than 30 percent to $19,000 per day.

ASSET VALUES: HESITANTLY HIGHER FOR SECONDHAND, MOSTLY FLAT FOR NEWBUILDINGSWhile 2013 had been the year of the newbuilding, 2014 was the year of secondhand prices. Secondhand prices for modern crude carriers increased by a respectable 30 percent on average, relative to year end 2013 levels, while gains for older vessels in general were more muted. The majority of the price increases were seen during the first quarter, as asset markets caught up with the unexpected rate spike in 2013. However, for the rest of the year it was mostly an uphill battle. The middle part of the year was uninspiring and some-what disappointing earnings wise, and buyers showed a distinct lack of conviction during the freight market upswing in Q4. MR values retreated as selling pressure built up in response to the disappoint-ing freight market in the first part of the year. Transaction volume doubled from 2013, however, as improved earnings tempted buyers as well as sellers.

Newbuilding prices also increased, but in a much more muted way. The recovery in freight rates shifted buyers’ attention towards vessels on the water. Slow activity in conventional segments, some LNG cancellations, and the downturn in offshore all made for a weak demand situation overall. Capacity availability, falling com-modity prices and a higher USD all contributed to keeping a lid on price increases during the second half of the year. For the year, newbuilding prices increased by about 5 percent relative to year-end 2013 levels.

THE OIL MARKET: ONE MAN’S CURSE IS ANOTHER MAN’S BLESSINGFollowing three years of remarkable stability, the oil market returned to its volatile ways in 2014. Prices remained near their year-long $110 average for the first half of the year, but began sinking from mid-year. At first the gains were linked to disappointing demand figures, which carried greater weight as the aforementioned down-grades to economic growth forecasts began. However, as oil pro-duction figures continued to beat even elevated forecasts, led by

THE TANKER MARKET

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

$1,000 per day

45,000 dwt 70/85,000 dwt 85/110,000 dwt

TANKER MARKET INDEX 2005–2014ANNUAL AVERAGES (WEIGHTED BY DWT)

TANKER FLEET 2005–2014AVERAGE ANNUAL CHANGES

FREIGHT RATES – SINGLE VOYAGE 2005–2014CLEAN CARRIERS

the US and the return of Libyan output, it became clear that rising supply was a more pressing issue. During the last four months of the year global oil supplies were growing by nearly 3 percent year-on-year, while demand growth was struggling to reach 1 percent. Com-mercial oil inventories rose and exceeded their normal levels for the

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

$1,000 per day

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Percent

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9


16 17

first time in several years, while spot oil prices fell below those of forward contracts; a clear market signal of excess supply. However, price weakness only turned into a rout during the last two months of the year, as it became clear that Saudi Arabia had no intention of relinquishing market share to support prices. Without an anchor, prices immediately plunged, searching for a new floor somewhere below $50 per barrel.

… AS THERE WAS PLENTY OF CARGO TO MOVE OVER LONGER DISTANCES, BOOSTING TONNAGE DEMANDFor the tanker market, the turn in the oil market turned out to be excellent news. More cargoes were searching for a home, boosting demand for transportation capacity. This caused market activity to pick up sharply as China moved to increase strategic storage and Middle East exports rose in response. Trade volume, which had been declining during the first half of the year, began recovering during the third quarter and accelerated during the fourth, as lower oil prices encouraged refiners to raise runs and build inventories. With the strong fourth quarter trade upswing, we estimate that the crude trade declined by 1 percent for the year, having been down by more than 3 percent at mid-year.

Product trades also grew strongly during the second half of the year, with all key export hubs in the US, Russia, Middle East and India humming. Trade volume expanded by nearly 2 percent, mod-erating the downturn in the total oil trade to less than 1 percent.

While it was a disappointing year volume wise, this was more than compensated for via longer distances. On the crude side, the first half of the year was dominated by continued high Middle East volume to the US and increasing long-haul imports to China and India from West Africa and Latin America. The oversupply of oil caused the premium of forward prices relative to spot to increase, thus facilitating more long-haul trade and causing tonnage demand to increase.

Clean trading distances also grew. The reasons for this include the increase of long-haul US exports to Asia, while European gaso-line exports took market share from Latin America in the North American market.

For the year, we estimate that average trading distances for the

entire seaborne oil trade increased by 3 percent, handily offsetting the decrease in volume and leading to an increase in ton-miles of more than 2 percent. This represented a significant improvement from 2013, when ton-mile demand was flat.

MORE TON-MILES AND LOWER PRODUCTIVITY DROVE A SOLID INCREASE IN TONNAGE DEMANDThe final component of our tonnage demand equation, fleet pro-ductivity, played a smaller, but still important, role. We estimate productivity decreased by 1–2 percent, about half of the typical rate of decrease in recent years, as sharply lower bunker prices during the second half of the year increased optimum speed. Rates were comparatively low and bunker prices comparatively high for most of the year however, which meant that changes were gradual.

Overall, we estimate that tonnage demand increased by more than 4 percent, about half a percentage point higher than 2013. This is a level that should be considered quite strong, given the fairly soft macro-climate, and gives reason to be optimistic as one looks into the near future, and, hopefully, better prospects for the world economy.

FLEET TRENDS: GROWTH SLOWS SHARPLY AS DELIVERIES ARE EVEN LOWER THAN EXPECTEDVery high fleet growth has been the tanker market’s nemesis for many years. Since 2009, net fleet growth has averaged more than 5 percent per year, reflecting the spike in new orders that brought the orderbook to nearly 50 percent of the sailing fleet by 2008. The tide began to turn in the second half of 2013, however, as the rate of new-building deliveries slowed. The trend continued in 2014. Deliveries were supposed to be in line with the previous year, but instead fell a further 25 percent to 16 mill dwt, the lowest level in more than a decade. The decline encompassed all segments, but was particularly sharp for Suezmaxes, which delivered only one-third of the sched-ule, mainly due to well-known problems at some Chinese shipyards.

It was an unexciting year for demolition, which remained in line with previous years at around 9 mill dwt, or 2 percent of the total fleet. The number of third and fourth special survey candidates is on the rise, but that has had little impact on demolition figures, so far.

0 5

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Mill dwt

Removals Deliveries

20

30

40

50

60

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

MBD

OPEC crude production Non-OPEC production World oil trade

DELIVERIES AND REMOVALS OF TANKERS 2005–2014EXCLUDING CHEMICAL CARRIERS

WORLD OIL PRODUCTION AND TRADE 2005–2014

THE TANKER MARKET

Total fleet growth was thus a meager 2 percent, a sharp slow-down from nearly 5 percent the year before. The decline was most pronounced for the crude fleet, which barely registered any growth at all, with the Aframax fleet actually decreasing. Product tankers, on the other hand, continued their steady expansion, increasing by 4 percent. Slow growth in the LR fleet moderated an 8 percent expansion of MRs.

New orders declined by one third from the previous year to 24 mill dwt, a relatively depressed level. Surprisingly, the pace of ordering slowed sharply during the year, as private equity capital got more interested in vessels on the water. The sharp freight market upswing in the second half of the year had very little effect on order-ing activity, as investors and owners remained cautious regarding the sustainability of the upswing.

MARKET OUTLOOK: GATHERING MOMENTUM, BUT BEWARE OF OIL SLICKS2015 came off to a very strong start, as the demand and supply trends that shaped the second half of 2014 continued. In addition to con-ventional inventory building boosting imports, the use of floating storage became a factor, adding to demand for tonnage. Fleet growth, meanwhile, looks unlikely to top 2 percent, which is very low. These trends all point to further increases in fleet utilization and freight rates. However, the plunge in oil prices has created another layer of uncertainty: Unless oil demand picks up sufficiently, oil supply will have to adjust down, eventually.

A STRONG YEAR FOR TONNAGE DEMAND AS VOLUME AND DISTANCES INCREASE...The world oil trade looks set for a year of robust expansion, hav-ing turned the corner in the second half of last year. World oil pro-duction is growing briskly which creates a positive backdrop for tonnage demand, while the rising USD is encouraging exporters to maximize volume. Importantly, we expect world oil demand to respond meaningfully to the price drop and snap out of its four-year long growth slump. While currency swings and changes in energy taxes cloud the picture, we believe these factors are unlikely to have much impact on the world’s two biggest oil consuming countries,

the US and China. In addition to growing oil consumption in Asia, the region is expected to continue building inventories for long-term strategic reasons as well as for shorter-term commercial ones.

… WHILE OIL SUPPLY ADJUSTMENTS ARE MORE LIKELY OUTSIDE THE MIDDLE EASTWith OPEC expected to continue to follow its new policy of letting

“the market decide oil prices” adjustments to world oil production volume should be less painful for the tanker market than in recent years. We see likely production growth rates slow from very high levels in North America, while high cost countries which for various reasons are deprived of investment, such as Russia, Venezuela, Nigeria and Libya, may see an outright drop in output. On the clean side, refineries in the mature markets in Europe and Asia are thought to be most vulnerable. They are net importers in the first place, however, which should moderate the impact on trade.

In sum, we see a much better balanced oil market during the second half of the year and do not foresee a sharp slump in tonnage demand. Improving oil demand is expected to smooth the inevitable end of oil inventory building.

REVIVAL OF FLOATING STORAGE WILL HELP, BUT IS NOT EXPECTED TO LAST FOR LONGThe present supply imbalance in the oil market also stands to benefit tanker demand, however, as forward oil price spreads have increased to levels making it profitable to hire vessels to store crude for the first time since 2010. Several VLCCs were picked up early in the year, but we do not foresee a repeat of the 2009–10 boom in which more than 50 VLCCs were taken out of active trading. This is because we believe oil market imbalances are significantly smaller this time.

FLEET GROWTH WILL REMAIN LIMITED, AS NEWBUILDING DELIVERIES STAY LOW

Tanker fleet growth is set to remain very slow, although the difference between the crude and clean segments will be wider than in 2013. Crude tanker deliveries are scheduled at 13 mill dwt, the lowest level since the late 1990s. While last year’s actual figure


70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Utilization rate (%)Mill dwt

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Percent

Source: IEA

WORLD OIL CONSUMPTION GROWTH 2005–2014 SUPPLY, DEMAND AND UTILIZATION RATE 2005–2014TANKER FLEET

18 19


came in at just 11 mill dwt, we anticipate that this year’s schedule is unlikely to be on target, as has been the case in recent years.

The situation is different in the clean market, which should see deliveries accelerate from 8 to 12 mill dwt. Demolition is expected to remain moderate. Higher freight rates will discourage owners from scrapping, but there will be an increase in the number of can-didates facing expensive third or fourth special surveys, and not every vessel will pass that survey.

In total, tanker fleet growth is set for another year of very mode-rate fleet expansion of less than 2 percent. That would mean that tonnage demand growth will have an unusually low threshold to cross before there is upward pressure on fleet capacity utilization and rates.

TIGHTER MARKET WILL BRING MORE VOLATILITY … BUT THE REAL RISK IS ANOTHER OPEC U-TURNIt follows that the expected increase in fleet capacity utilization will lead to increased volatility in freight rates. The extraordinary situ-ation in which oil imports rise faster than consumption because of stockbuilding, while floating storage further restrains even low fleet growth, will not last forever. At some point the tanker market may find itself in the paradoxical situation of weakening as the world economy begins to improve, because these two factors will begin to reverse. Likewise, the combination of higher gross freight rates in USD/ton and falling bunker prices is very likely to tempt owners into raising speed in order to capture super-profits. This increase in

“hidden” capacity will contribute to bringing freight rates down from peak levels. For more on this important dynamic, see page 12.

Still, that is not the situation we fear most, as this would merely be a normal correction in an overheated market. The real problems for the tanker market, both crude and clean, will be if the world economy remains mired in sub-par growth, despite lower energy costs. Inventory building has its limits and eventually there will have to be supply adjustment in the market. Although Saudi Arabia has remained adamant that “only the most efficient producers shall sur-vive” one cannot rule out the possibility that acute financial pressure on some of OPEC’s members (Venezuela, Nigeria, Iran) will result

Aframax Suezmax VLCC MR Product

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Mill $

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

MARKET VALUES OF TANKERS 2005–20145 YEARS OLD

in this decision being reconsidered, possibly in cooperation with large non-OPEC producers, as has happened in the past.

That would be a direct blow to tonnage demand, as cargo volume would decrease. The loss of volume would impact both the crude and the clean segment, but we believe crude would be more exposed, as the least cost-efficient refineries are situated in net importing regions.

In summary, we believe 2015 is shaping up as something of a perfect storm for the tanker market. The oil trade is expected to grow at its fastest rate in several years, while fleet capacity growth will be near its lowest. Against that backdrop, we look forward to another exciting cyclical chapter in the history of the tanker market.

OLE-RIKARD HAMMERHead of Research


Copyright: Aleksey Stemmer

AVERAGE FREIGHT RATES, TRIP CHARTER$1,000 PER DAY

THE DRY BULK MARKET

T H E D RY B U L K M A R K E T

WEAK TONNAGE DEMAND DEFINES DISAPPOINTING YEARAverage earnings for dry bulk ships were lower in 2014 than 2013. Preliminary assessments suggest tonnage demand increased by slightly more than 4 percent, which was lower than anticipated. The shortfall was largely caused by a strong drop in Chinese coal, bauxite and nickel ore imports. Meanwhile, the size of the fleet increased by 5 percent, giving a fleet utilization rate decrease of around 1 percent.

For the full year of 2014, our weighted dry bulk index fell from $12,800 per day in 2013 to $11,500 per day, a drop of 10 percent. The largest decrease came in the Panamax sector, where average earn-ings decreased from $9,500 per day in 2013 to $7,700 in 2014, a slide of 19 percent. Capesizes obtained $14,800 per day against $16,600 the year before. For Supramax tonnage, freight rates decreased from $10,300 per day to $9,800, while the Handy sector daily earnings eroded from $8,200 to $7,700 per day.

SIGNIFICANT DECREASE IN ASSET VALUESShip values generally followed earnings trends, with the number of transactions dropping by around 20 percent compared to 2013. While newbuilding prices fell only marginally, secondhand values decreased between 15 and 25 percent for the Handy, Supramax and Panamax categories, depending on age. For Capesize tonnage, values dropped somewhat less, especially for modern tonnage.

DRY BULK IMPORTS BY COUNTRY/REGION 2005–2014

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

Mill tons/year

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

China Japan Other Asia W. Europe India

T/C RATES BULK CARRIERS 2005–201412 MONTHS

Capesize Handysize Panamax Supramax

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

1,000 $/day

SEABORNE TRADESeaborne transportation of dry bulk commodities measured in ton-miles increased by around 4 percent from 2013 to 2014. Iron ore transportation climbed by 11 percent and grain/soybean transportation combined grew 9 percent. On the contrary, shipsments of coal fell by 1 percent and other commodities dropped by 1.5 percent.

In China, total dry bulk imports grew by a meagre 2 percent. By commodity, iron ore imports escalated by 13 percent, grain by 52 percent and soybean by 13 percent. On the minus side, coal

2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4

Capesize 9.8 16.6 14.8Panamax 8.1 9.5 7.7

Supramax 9.4 10.3 9.8

Handysize 7.6 8.2 7.7


20 21

imports fell 11 percent, bauxite 49 percent and nickel ore 33 percent. The dramatic decline in bauxite and nickel ore was caused by the Indonesian export ban introduced in January. Market participants had expected the ban to be repealed during the year, but instead it became law. The drop in coal imports was caused by a substan-tial increase in hydro power generation in the electricity sector, low growth in coal demand from steel and other industrial sectors, high coal inventories at the start of the year, and stable domestic coal pro-duction.

In the rest of the world, dry bulk imports climbed in total 4 per-cent from the year before. India increased imports by 16 percent, mainly driven by coal. Japan and other Asian countries elevated their imports by 5 percent and the Middle East by 3 percent. Africa and the US also imported higher volumes than last year. The US imported more steel products and fertilizer, while African imports were driven by a wider specter of industrial commodities. European countries reduced dry bulk imports by around 1 percent.

Among major exporting countries, Australia continued its rapid expansion of iron ore exports with a 24 percent hike from the year before. Coal exports climbed 9 percent, other minerals 10 percent, and grain exports by 5 percent. Brazil lifted its iron ore export 4 per-cent and other minerals by 3 percent. Grain and soybean shipments fell 3 percent. Argentina experienced a 12 percent drop in grain exports, while US and Canadian grain exports jumped 40 and 20 percent, respectively. Indonesia exported about 10 percent less coal and only minor volumes of bauxite and nickel ore.

SAILING DISTANCESThe average sailing distance in iron ore was 3 percent lower than the year before, caused by a relatively strong increase in Australian exports compared to longer-haul trades. In coal, the average sailing distance was longer, mainly due to higher Australian volumes rela-tive to Indonesian transports to Asian countries. In other commod-ities, sailing distances lengthened in steel products, alumina and wood pulp, with only small changes otherwise.

FLEET PRODUCTIVITY The worsening imbalance in cross trade between the Atlantic and the Pacific Basins resulted in higher ballasting. Average speed fell

only marginally compared with the year before. Port congestion decreased on a global average basis, but with some divergence on a regional basis. Australia and China faced higher congestion, while South American and Indonesian ports were less congested due to improved logistics and slow export growth.

FLEET GROWTHDeliveries of new ships reached 47 mill dwt. This was 13 mill dwt less than the program at the start of the year. Removals amounted to 15 mill dwt. Calculated as an average for the year, the dry bulk fleet increased in size by slightly above 5 percent.

By segment, the Panamax/post Panamax fleet was enlarged by 8 percent, while the Supramax and Capesize fleet expanded by 5 per-cent. The Handysize fleet increased by 1 percent.

Ordering of new ships remained brisk during the first half of the year, but slowed substantially in the second half in response to the weaker freight market. Nevertheless, 67 mill dwt of new orders were placed for the whole year, giving an orderbook increase, from year end 2013 to year end 2014, of 16.5 to 20 percent of the existing fleet.

MARKET PROSPECTSTonnage demandThe prognosis for the world economy is for world steel demand to increase by 2–3 percent from 2014 to 2015. China’s steel demand is forecasted to climb by only 1 percent.

One critical factor for tonnage demand, especially for Capesize tonnage, will be China’s import requirement for iron ore. Last year’s substantial increase in iron ore imports, combined with increased domestic production, raised Chinese iron ore inventories to an all time high at year end. Based on the prevailing forecasts for steel demand growth, we doubt there is room for another year with a sim-ilar increase in iron ore supply to the Chinese market without prices eroding further. With lower production costs in Australia and Brazil, falling production in China and other high cost producer countries seems likely. However, if Chinese mines receive support from the Government, the closedown of high cost Chinese production could take longer than expected, thereby forcing overseas mines to cut production and exports in order to stabilize prices.

Another vital element will be China’s coal import requirement.

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

05 06 07

Mill dwt

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Utilization rate (%)


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Mill $

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Capesize Panamax Supramax Handysize

SUPPLY, DEMAND AND UTILIZATION RATE 2005–2014DRY BULK FLEET

MARKET VALUES OF BULK CARRIERS 2005–20145 YEARS OLD

THE DRY BULK MARKET

BULK CARRIER FLEET 2005–2014AVERAGE ANNUAL CHANGES

NEW ORDERS OF BULK CARRIERS 2005–2014

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Percent

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Mill dwt

Copyright: Ultrabulk Shipping A/S


22 23

Stronger focus on environmental issues will most likely reduce the growth in coal consumption over the coming years at the expense of other energy sources. Utilization of growing hydro power capacity will greatly depend on rainfall. Other key elements for future coal import to China will be the underlying growth in energy demand, how quickly the energy mix changes, and not least Chinese policy related to support of domestic coal mining.

The strongest upside potential in coal trade is in higher Indian imports. Expanding steel production and coal burning power plant capacities are expected to generate stronger growth in coal demand than domestic production can satisfy in the short- to medium-term. There are also a couple of new coal fired power plants under con-struction in other Asian countries, driving coal imports.

World coal trade is therefore likely to increase going forward, but the underlying growth rate may be lower than in recent years.

The transportation of bulk commodities, especially in the minerals sector, should, in general, expand in tandem with economic growth. The strong growth in Chinese steel products export is likely to moderate this year due to the withdrawal of export rebates on boron steel, making Chinese steel less competi-tive on the export market.

New supplies of bauxite will gradually become available in Australia, Malaysia and West Africa, but a full replacement of the Indonesian shortfall will come in 2016 at the earliest. Nickel ore exports from the Philippines have only partly replaced the Indo- nesian volumes, and any further escalation of production capacity is not in the pipeline in the medium-term.

It is premature to conclude regarding the grain and soybean trade; nevertheless, the bumper crops of 2014 should bode well for continued high trade volumes, at least in the first half of 2015.

A continued expansion of arable land in South America is expected to raise demand for fertilizers at a quicker rate than the expansion of local production can meet. Fertilizer import is there-fore the most likely growth segment in the coming years.

In forest products, wood pellet transportation is anticipated to escalate further, especially from North America to Europe, but also from Vietnam, China and Canada to South Korea. We also foresee a further increase in woodchip and log transportation to China.

In our base scenario, we predict seaborne dry bulk trade to increase in the region of 4 percent from 2014 to 2015. In this scenario, we anticipate Chinese iron ore imports to grow by 50 mill tons and coal imports to remain more or less stagnant. Growth in real ton-nage demand is not expected to deviate significantly from volume growth. Sailing distances in grain, soybeans and forestry products are expected to rise, while we foresee relatively small changes in iron ore and coal. Even though bunker oil prices have dropped dramat-ically of late, we do not expect the sailing speed to increase much unless freight rates rise to unexpectedly high levels.

Fleet trendThe fleet is anticipated to expand by between 4 and 5 percent in 2015. The orderbook program suggests around 73 mill dwt to enter oper-ation this year. We assume actual deliveries to total some 55 mill dwt due to expected slippage. Removals are assumed to land in the region of 22–24 mill dwt.

CONCLUSIONOn this basis, supply and demand growth is not expected to devi-ate dramatically, and market fundamentals are therefore likely to remain more or less unchanged, with average earnings remaining at relatively low levels. However, we should expect volatility through 2015 for seasonal and other reasons.

The major downside risks for dry bulk demand in a short- to medium-term perspective are the Chinese import requirements for iron ore and coal. Should demand deviate significantly from assumptions, it will have a major impact on market fundamentals.

The upside potential lies in a more expansive fiscal policy in China, which could result in higher growth in, for example, steel-in-tensive investments, potentially stimulating raw material imports.

BJØRN BODDINGRS Platou Economic Research

DELIVERIES AND REMOVALS OF BULK CARRIERS* 2005–2014 WORLD STEEL OUTPUT 2005–2014

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Mill dwt

* Incl. conversionsRemovals Deliveries

Mill tons

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Total world China Rest of the world

THE CONTAINTER SHIP MARKET

STATUS QUOThe Container Ship Market in 2014 was characterized by small changes in freight rates compared with the year before. The decline in box rates in the last two months of the year was driven by slowing volumes on major trade lanes after the peak season in the third quarter. In general, average charter rates showed only moderate changes from the previous year, but with some deviations among individual segments.

FREIGHT RATES AND CHARTER RATESFreight rates per TEU increased about 2 percent from the previous year, calculated on a yearly average basis. However, strong volatility was registered, especially on the Asia to Europe string, with slack freight rates during the first half followed by a stronger third quarter, before faltering again towards the end of the year. In other trades, there was less volatility, probably as a result of the relatively higher coverage of term freight contracts.

Charter rates also showed relatively small changes. The year was as dull as the year before, with low charter rates affecting most vessel sizes, except for larger over Panamax tonnage, particularly ships above 9,000 TEU. Compared to 2013, smaller tonnage of 5,500 TEU did not do as well, whilst Panamax tonnage enjoyed a slight recovery. The small upswing in this segment was fuelled by several service upgrades and extra demand for ships to the US, caused by heavy congestion on the US west coast.

CONTAINER MOVEMENTS AND TONNAGE DEMANDPreliminary data suggests global container ship demand jumped by over 6 percent from 2013 to 2014. Trade statistics suggest global con-tainer movements climbed by between 5 and 6 percent.

Assessing trends by region, in the US containerized imports

were up nearly 5 percent year-on-year. The volume of laden boxes from Asia was up 4 percent, while container traffic from South America rose by only 1 percent. On the Europe–US route, an increase of nearly 10 percent was recorded.

Container traffic into Europe climbed 6 percent. Activity grew steadily over the first three quarters, but slowed in the last as a result of softer economic activity. Far East Asian volume to Europe was up 8 percent year-on-year, while traffic from the USA and South America increased only marginally. The strongest rise in European imports came from India, with an 11 percent escalation.

Intra Asian container traffic increased by a moderate 4 percent. China registered only a slim increase in containerized imports, while Korea recorded a 5 percent climb. Thailand and Indonesia elevated their container volumes by 4 and 6 percent, respectively. Asian exporters raised containerized exports to the Middle East by 8 percent and to Africa by 13 percent, while box shipments to East Coast South America rose 5 percent.

FLEET GROWTHSome 1.5 mill TEU of new container ship capacity entered opera-tion in 2014. This was about 300,000 TEU less than the order book program. Scrapping totaled 400,000 TEU of capacity, which was

T H E C O N TA I N E R S H I P M A R K E T

0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

1,000 TEU

DELIVERIES OF CELLULAR CONTAINER SHIPS 2005–2014 CONTAINER IMPORTS – SELECTED REGIONS 2005–2014

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Mill TEU

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

EU USA Asia


24 25

FLEET TRENDNew ships with a capacity of around 1.9 mill TEU are scheduled for operation in 2015. Continued weak market conditions could cause some slippage. We assume that 1.6 mill TEU will hit the water. A very large proportion of the new ships entering service this year are within the largest size categories. This will continue to generate a cascading effect on other trades. We assume that scrapping will be slightly lower than last year. On this basis, the net fleet expansion will be slightly below 7 percent from 2014 to 2015.

Congestion and bottlenecking have caused concern during 2014. Industry commentators blame these issues on bigger ships and the larger volumes of cargo being passed to docks in one portion. With vessel upsizing set to continue – not only on major trades, but also on smaller trades as a result of cascading – this issue will not be resolved in the near future.

The recent sharp drop in bunker oil prices raises the question of what will happen with ship speeds. Industry leaders are divided, but if fuel cost savings are less than charter ship costs etc. there might be incentives for operators to increase speed on some services in order to reduce the share of chartered tonnage. Higher fleet efficiency will, on the contrary, affect the fleet utilization rate and contribute to weaker freight rates.

In conclusion, the anticipated tonnage demand growth is more or less in line with the likely growth in fleet capacity. The fleet utilization rate is therefore expected to show small changes from 2014 to 2015. The main downside risk is a weaker than predicted per-formance from the world economy. Container carriers’ attempts to improve profitability may, in addition to reducing operating costs, also include an adjustment to the size of the operating fleet. This can be done with idling or withdrawals of capacity in low volume seasons. The newly established vessel sharing agreement among the largest liner companies will lead to stronger competition for increased market shares and may therefore affect freight rates negatively. The main upside potential in this sector is a quicker than expected economic recovery, especially in the Euro area, which will boost tonnage demand significantly, especially in the large sizes.

BJØRN BODDINGRS Platou Economic Research

60,000 TEU lower than last year’s record. The average age of ships sold for breaking was 22 years, about the same as in the previous year. Net fleet expansion was 6.2 percent across the year.

The idle fleet decreased to 118 units at the end of 2014, equivalent to 230,000 TEU of capacity. This represents only 1.2 percent of the total fleet. Only three ships above 7500 TEU and two ships between 5000 and 7500 TEU were reported idle.

The total fleet capacity utilization rate was more or less unchanged, while the operating fleet utilization dropped somewhat due to the re-activation of idle tonnage. MARKET PROSPECTSHistorically, container traffic has increased at a rate that is around double the world GDP growth. In 2014, the ratio was 1.7, which is the same as in 2013. Despite stronger growth in European and US container imports compared with the previous year, intra regional trade within Asia and a couple of other emerging market services increased less than the year before.

The prevailing prognosis for world GDP in 2015 suggests an increase in world container traffic of some 6–7 percent. This is based on the same factor to GDP as last year assuming there is a relatively limited need to replenish global inventories in the short-term.

On a regional basis, the most important trade lane in the con-tainer market, measured in TEU-miles, is Asia to Europe. GDP growth in Europe is forecast to be moderate, which suggests an associated increase in container imports. US container imports seem likely to increase somewhat more than last year, driven by expected higher economic growth.

Trade growth within Asian is likely to accelerate at a faster pace than last year. Chinese import growth is expected to remain sub-dued due to predicted low economic growth. However, within other Asian countries such as Korea, Thailand and Indonesia, there is an assumption that brisker economic activity should support containerized imports. The Indian economy is also anticipated to recover and this should lead to higher imports of consumer goods etc. Latin America and Africa are also likely to contribute more significantly to world container trade growth going forward.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

$1,000 per day

4,500 TEU 3,000 TEU 1,700 TEU 1,000 TEU 5,600 TEU

T/C RATES FOR CONTAINER SHIPS 2005–201412 MONTHS

THE CAR CARRIER MARKET

T H E C A R C A R R I E R M A R K E T

ANOTHER DISAPPOINTING YEAR2014 turned into a disappointing year for the car carrier industry. Despite growing auto sales in the major markets, demand for tonnage has been at a standstill, with most of the increased demand for cars covered by local production. Emerging market sales are in decline, directly impacting on seaborne volumes as local production is scarce. In addition, constant fleet growth means that the oversupply of tonnage has been exacerbated.

Seaborne volumes from all of the largest export markets developed negatively over 2014. Japanese exports came down as expected, but the reduction was larger than we had anticipated, ending down 4 percent. This was mainly due to new assembly capacity commenc-ing operation in overseas markets, covering most of the added demand for Japanese brands. While we had expected Korean exports to rebound from a disappointing 2013, the downward trend continued and volumes were reduced by 1 percent. Exports from the EU were also significantly reduced, mainly into African and Latin American markets.

However, emerging export markets such as China, Thailand and India continued their positive development. Combined, these three countries boosted exports by an estimated 3 percent, despite a troublesome first half of the year in Thailand.

Auto sales, the ultimate driver for seaborne transportation of cars, developed positively in all of the largest markets, namely USA, Western Europe and China. However, as vehicle assembly is being expanded rapidly in these markets, most of the added demand was covered by local production. Emerging market sales, which depend more on imports due to limited local production, are down. Russia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East have all seen reduced

Mill vehicles

Japan Korea China, Thailand and India

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

AUTOMOBILE EXPORT 2005–2014

demand in 2014, which to a larger extent impacts negatively on sea-borne volumes.

Relocation of production is a trend likely to continue in the short- to medium-term. Japanese and European automakers have already shifted some of their production to North America, China, Thailand and India, and Korean makers are expected to follow suit. This also opens the possibility for new trade lanes at sea, as some models will be produced at new locations for export to global markets. That may, over time, generate added tonnage demand, but we expect that these new volumes will mostly fill available capacity onboard the fleet in the next few years, until they reach such levels that further tonnage is required.

We estimate that tonnage demand in 2014 did not grow, but remained at the same level as the year before. Despite an anticipated reduction in export volumes from Japan and Korea, demand is fore-casted to grow by around 3 percent in 2015, backed by increased volumes from emerging exporters, as well as from the EU and North America.

The car carrier fleet expanded by a modest 2 percent in 2014, as 22 new vessels entered into operation and 13 were removed. The orderbook at year-end comprised 55 vessels due for delivery into 2017, corresponding to 10 percent of the fleet. Fleet growth in 2015 is estimated at 2.8 percent.

As a consequence of fleet growth being higher than demand growth, the fleet capacity utilization was reduced to 83 percent in 2014, down from 85 percent in 2013. The increase in oversupply of tonnage impacted negatively on rates too; the average 12-month T/C rate for a 6,500 cap. car carrier ended at $23,200 per day, down $1,400 per day from a year before. The outlook for 2015 does not bode for much change, as both demand and supply are expected to grow at the same rate. Overcapacity is therefore likely to remain at the same level. The balance is rather fragile though – any unex-pected events, and they tend to be negative, would unfortunately only increase the oversupply of tonnage.

OLE GUSTAV ERIKSEN RS Platou Economic Research

26 27

THE LNG SHIPPING MARKET

T H E L N G S H I P P I N G M A R K E T

LNG MARKET APPROACHING THE BOTTOM OF THE CYCLEThe LNG shipping market finally witnessed growth in seaborne trade after a declining pattern over the previous two years. However, due to a continued fall in transport distance and the improved productivity of the fleet, total shipping demand remained unchanged. The LNG carrier fleet grew by 5 percent, resulting in a corresponding 5 percent weakening of the fleet’s utilization rate, and a fall in short-term charter rates of 40–45 percent. On average a modern, steam turbine ship earned $54,500 per day, while a ship equipped with dual-fuelled propulsion commanded $10,000 more per day.

Preliminary figures suggest a LNG seaborne trade of 241 mill mt in 2014, up 2.5 percent from 2013. One facility, the Arun plant in Indo-nesia, finally closed down after 36 years in service. Three facilities were inaugurated: PNG LNG in Papua New Guinea, Arzew GL3A in Algeria and Queensland Curtis Island LNG in Australia. These projects have a nameplate capacity of 20 mill mt per year.

The second part of the ton-miles equation, transport distance, continued to decline during 2014. In spite of a small increase in the inter-basin trade between the Atlantic basin and Asia, the average recorded transport distance was almost 2 percent lower this year than last.

Coupled with a small improvement in the fleet’s productivity, mainly resulting from lower bunker prices, and thus higher optimal

speeds and a small increase in the capacity used as FSRUs, we have estimated total shipping demand for 2014 to be at the same level as the year before.

The LNG fleet saw an uptick in its growth rate during 2014, as 30 new ships left the shipyards. Four vessels were removed from the market, resulting in a capacity expansion of 5 percent across the year. Order activity in 2014 was high, particularly towards the end of the year, and in total we recorded 70 new contracts. By the end of 2014, an orderbook of 20 mill cbm represented 34 percent of the existing fleet.

Demand was at a standstill and, seen against a 5 percent fleet expansion, this resulted in a drop in the fleet’s utilization rate of 5 percent, lowering short-term rates by the aforementioned 40 to 45 percent during 2014.

In 2015, we expect seaborne trade to pick up even further. Five new LNG projects are due to come online, four in Australia and a small one in Indonesia, with a combined nameplate capacity of 20 mill mt. Pooled with the additional capacity of last year’s expansion, we foresee a 16 mill mt growth in trade, equal to 7 percent growth year-on-year. Average transport distance is expected to continue to decline, albeit marginally, as lower oil price and thereby also the LNG price in Asia will negatively affect inter-basin trade. In sum we forecast a 7 percent growth in shipping demand this year.

Deliveries of new tonnage should be at the same level as in 2014, 4.8 mill cbm, which, combined with an anticipated removal of 1.2 mill cbm, should yield a fleet growth of 9 percent in 2015. In total, this should result in a 2 percent drop in the fleet’s utilization rate to 84 percent.

JØRN BAKKELUNDRS Platou Economic Research

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Steam

$1,000 per day

DFDE

SHORT TERM RATE FOR LNG CARRIERS 2005–2014

SMALL SCALE LNG MARKET

SM A L L S C A L E L NG M A R K E T

ANOTHER HECTIC YEAROur predictions from the Platou report last year on the LNG marine fuel market came true. As predicted, we have seen several small-scale LNG companies announce new marine LNG bunkering capacity. Notable projects were GDF-Suez and Shell’s orders for one LNG bunkering vessel each in Asia and, at the beginning of 2015, Skangass’ order of Europe’s first custom-built LNG bunkering vessel.

What now remains to be seen is if the North American LNG bunker market will also develop with a similar, or maybe even stronger, pace than the European market. The spread between gas prices and liquid fuel prices here are even more pronounced than in Europe, which should facilitate strong growth.

In parallel with the availability of new marine bunkering capacity, shipowners have followed up by ordering even more vessels capable of running on LNG. At our newbuilding desk in RS Platou, we have seen a steady increase in owners interested in LNG fuel capabilities for their newbuildings. This is also connected with the new rules for the northern European Sulphur Emission Control Area (SECA), which entered into force on 1 January 2015.

2014 will also go down in history as a year of dramatic fluctu-ations in energy costs. Whilst the oil price at the start of the year was around USD 110 per barrel, 2014 ended with a steep decline and prices that fell to below USD 50 per barrel by the beginning of 2015.

The small-scale LNG market is also an energy market. The end users of the product can often choose between several energy sources, including liquid fuels. Although a large part of the volumes

in this trade are normally sold on longer-term contracts, a sustained drop in oil price will surely impact the small-scale LNG sector as well. In 2015 it remains to be seen if pressure on energy prices will influence the ton-mile demand in the small-scale LNG sector. How-ever, despite the fall in oil prices, LNG remains an attractive energy source in the long run.

When looking into 2015, we believe there will be continued healthy growth in the small-scale LNG segment – both for vessels transporting LNG, and for vessels using LNG as fuel. Based upon our sensors in the market, we also believe that we may see more mid-sized LNG vessels being built in the years to come. This is due to fur-ther developments in the small-scale LNG infrastructure, with more shore-based receiving terminals under construction. LNG may therefore be transported greater distances to these new locations.

EGIL ROKSTADRS Platou Shipbrokers

Cop

yrigh

t: An

thon

y Ved

er


28 29

T H E L P G S H I P P I N G M A R K E T

LPG SHIPPING MARKET REACHES NEW HEIGHTSDuring 2014 record high rates for the larger LPG carriers were seen. Driven by a massive expansion of exports from the USA and healthy Middle East exports – and in spite of a contraction in the Ammonia seaborne trade – we have estimated that total shipping demand for LPG and Ammonia has grown by 16 percent during 2014. Combined with a 6 percent fleet growth, the utilization rate climbed by 10 percent and reached an all-time-high of 99 percent. This resulted in a two-fold increase in average spot earnings for VLGCs at $68,000 per day. The hike in spot rates was less pronounced for smaller ships, with a Midsize LPG carrier earning on average 17 percent more in 2014 at $32,000 per day.

The seaborne trade for the two commodities LPG and Ammonia developed in the opposite direction during 2014. Based on pre-liminary figures we have estimated an upswing in LPG exports by 18 percent. The USA continued to be the main driver, increasing exports by almost 70 percent, while Middle East exporters appear to have increased exports by 10 percent.

The Ammonia trade is estimated to have eroded by 6 percent in 2014. Lower exports from Ukraine and Russia, due to geopolitical tensions, and much lower US imports are the main reasons behind the fall. In total, seaborne trade is estimated to have increased by 15 percent in 2014.

LPG AND AMMONIA TRANSPORT DISTANCEThe average transport distance for LPG is estimated to have increased by 2 percent during 2014. The LPG exported from the USA was, on average, transported 10 percent further compared to the previous year. The portion of the export shipped to the

Americas slipped three percentage points to 60 percent, while the amount of cargoes sold to Europe increased from 15 to 19 percent. The share to Asia also increased, from 13 to 15 percent.

A 13 percent decline in the average transport distance in the Ammonia trade resulted in a 1 percent rise in transport distance for LPG and Ammonia combined. We estimate a 16 percent growth in demand for LPG carriers in 2014.

FLEET DEVELOPMENTDuring 2014 we registered 21 new LPG carriers delivered from the shipyards, with a combined capacity of 1.05 million cbm. Mean-while, six smaller vessels, equal to 0.09 million cbm, were removed. Record high ordering activity resulted in 91 new contracts placed during 2014, as the orderbook ended the year at 9.9 million cbm, representing 52 percent of the existing fleet. The average fleet growth in 2014 for fully- and semi-ref ships larger than 10,000 cbm was 6 percent year-on-year.

$1,000 per day

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

Utilization rate (%)

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Mill cbm

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14


YEARLY AVG. SPOT RATE FOR VLGC 2005–2014 SUPPLY, DEMAND AND UTILIZATION RATE 2005–2014LPG CARRIERS

BALANCE IN 2014A 6 percent fleet growth compared to a 16 percent growth in ship-ping demand lifted the utilization rate in 2014 by 10 percent to 99 percent. This impacted upon average spot earnings for VLGCs, which saw a two-fold increase to an average of $68,000 per day.

EXPECTATION FOR 2015For the coming year, we expect seaborne trade to increase by 4 percent. LPG trade is projected to grow by 5 percent, again driven by exports from the USA, while the Ammonia trade is expected to weaken by 3 percent on the back of lower US imports.

We predict that the average transport distance for LPG will increase by 5 percent, as more US exports are shipped to Europe and Asia. We expect a small decline in transport distance for Ammonia.

The total transport distance should increase by 4 to 5 percent and overall shipping demand is forecast to grow by 9 percent in 2015.

Newbuild deliveries will start to pick up this year, with 3.8 mil-lion cbm of shipping capacity set to be delivered. Combined with an anticipated removal of 0.6 million cbm, the fleet should grow by 11 percent.

The utilization rate in 2015 is thereby anticipated to drop by 2 per-cent to 97 percent, which should ease some of the upward pressure seen last year.

JØRN BAKKELUNDRS Platou Economic Research

THE LPG SHIPPING MARKET

Copyright: BW LPG

30 31

T H E S H I P B U I L D I N G M A R K E T

WEAK FREIGHT MARKETS RESTRAIN ORDERING ACTIVITYShipyard activity in 2014 was characterized by a high volume of new orders early in the year, decreasing steadily towards the end. While private equity boosted demand for new vessels in 2013, the window of opportunity for this kind of players vanished as orderbooks were filled up and delivery times were prolonged.

New orders amounted to 39 mill compensated gross tons (cgt), which is a reduction of 15 percent from 2013. Orders for tankers, bulk carriers and container ships were markedly reduced, whereas contract volumes for capital intensive vessels like gas carriers, chem-ical tankers and cruise ships increased by almost 50 percent.

Order volumes were on par with our estimated shipyard capacity, which is also reflected in our newbuilding price index which ended 2014 at the same level as it started.

DEMAND FOR NEW TONNAGEWhile demand for newbuildings exceeded expectations in 2013, the level of contracting returned to more normalized levels in 2014, at least compared to prevailing market conditions in the various ship-ping markets. 39 mill cgt of new orders were registered at shipyards during the year, a 15 percent reduction from a year before. This is still somewhat higher than what we had expected a year ago; how-ever, this can be party explained by the continued presence of insti-tutional investors in the first quarter of 2014 when orders came in significantly above the average for the remaining three quarters.

These players dominated the contracting arena in 2013, utilizing the opportunity of ordering ships of new design at low prices with relatively short time until delivery in what appeared, at the time, to become improved markets.

As newbuilding prices increased on the back of increased demand and delivery times were prolonged as orderbooks became thicker, this window of opportunity vanished and the flow of private equity into shipping did too. This tendency was clear already during the first quarter when new orders dropped signifi-cantly from January until March.

Our freight rate index increased by 25 percent from 2013 to 2014 and ended at $17,200 per day for the year. Historically, this index is linked to the volume of new orders placed by conventional ship owners, i.e. those who are in this business with a long-term per-spective. A freight rate index at this level indicates that the annual volume of new orders placed should be in the region of 33 mill cgt. While reported orders came in at 39 mill cgt, or close to 20 per-cent higher, the deviation may be explained partly by the very high activity early in the year. January and February orders combined

Mill $

Capesize Panamax/Kamsarmax Handymax/Supramax

0

20

40

60

80

100

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Mill $

VLCC Suezmax Aframax MR Clean

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

BUILDING PRICES FOR BULK CARRIERS 2005–2014 BUILDING PRICES FOR TANKERS 2005–2014

THE PLATOU REPORT 2015 THE SHIPBUILDING MARKET

represented more than 4 mill cgt of additional volumes compared to what the 2014 monthly average indicates.

Newbuilding prices increased as a consequence of the large volumes of orders placed in 2013 and early 2014. However, as order-ing activity started to drop again, prices reached a peak in the second quarter of last year before starting to decrease again. Our newbuilding price index rose by 12 percent during 2013 and added another 2 percent until mid-2014, but has since then retracted and we are now back at the level seen at the end of 2013.

While the annual volume of new orders last year, in absolute terms, ranks 5th historically, it represents only around 7.5 percent of the global fleet which is only the 10th highest of the past 17 yearly records. Compared to 2007 when new orders represented 24 per-cent of the fleet, last year’s volume is therefore quite moderate.

Rough estimates indicate that around 75 bill USD was invested in new ships during 2014. That is an increase of around 10 bill USD from 2013, partly explained by the higher newbuilding prices early in the year, but also due to the larger portion of capital intensive vessels such as gas carriers, chemical tankers and cruise ships ordered in 2014.

In cgt terms, Chinese yards claimed 39 percent of all orders in 2014 and 27 percent of these were for domestic accounts. This is a higher portion than in 2013, which could be explained by the favorable recycling scheme for Chinese ship owners and yards introduced by the government in 2013. 30 percent of the new orders went to Korean yards, of which 11 percent were for Korean accounts. Japanese yards received 22 percent of all new orders in 2014, up from 14 percent in 2013. This is largely a consequence of the improved competitiveness of Japanese yards as they have benefitted from a weaker yen, in contrast to Korean yards that have been facing an appreciating won. 38 percent of the orders at Japanese yards were backed by Japanese owners.

TankersNew orders of tankers reached 25 mill dwt, of which 59 percent went to Korean yards and 22 percent to China. This represents a 38 percent reduction in new orders from 2013, which recorded a particularly high number of VLCC orders at the end of the year backed by strong earnings. Despite comparably high rate levels at

the end of 2014 such ordering activity was not repeated, indicating that many of the VLCC orders in December 2013 were backed by aforementioned institutional investors who are no longer present in this market.

16.4 mill dwt of tonnage was delivered during the year, leaving the fleet at 478 mill dwt at year-end. The orderbook comprised 63 mill dwt, corresponding to 14 percent of the fleet.

Bulk carriersWhile bulk carrier orders gradually increased during 2013, the tendency was the opposite last year. January started strongly with 17 mill dwt of new orders, but demand faded throughout the year as freight markets and prospects remained in the doldrums. Novem-ber orders were reported at a mere 1.4 mill dwt with December only marginally higher. Accumulated orders ended at 67 mill dwt which is a reduction of 20 percent from 2013, although still high in historical terms and ranking third among top contracting years for bulk carriers.

Expectedly, most orders went to Chinese yards, represent-ing 60 percent. Japanese yards claimed 23 percent; a distribution quite similar to the year before. 2014 deliveries reached 47 mill dwt, leaving the orderbook at 146 mill dwt which is close to 20 percent of the fleet at year-end.

Container shipsContainer ship ordering was markedly reduced in 2014, compared to the year before. A total of 1.15 mill TEU was ordered, down 42 percent from 2013. Close to 90 percent of new orders were vessels larger than 8,000 TEU, with the remaining orders being for vessels below 4,000 TEU. No new vessels between 4,000 and 8,000 TEU were ordered last year. Japanese yards were able to secure a substantial portion of the new container contracts, corresponding to 23 percent. Chinese and Korean yards claimed 35 and 37 percent, respectively.

Deliveries amounted to 1.5 mill TEU in the same period, taking the orderbook down to 18 percent of the fleet, compared to 22 percent a year earlier. A total of 3.2 mill TEU remains for delivery in 2015 and onwards.

Mill $

9,000 TEU 6,000 TEU 4,500 TEU 1,700 TEU

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 0

20

40

60

80

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Mill cgt

Others Container ships Bulk carriers Tankers

BUILDING PRICES FOR CONTAINER SHIPS 2005–2014 NEW ORDERS 2005–2014


32 33

BUILDING CAPACITY AND SLIPPAGEThe steady decrease in deliveries from yards since the peak in 2012 continued also during 2014. Average monthly deliveries were 2.3 mill cgt, down from 2.6 mill cgt a year earlier and 3.4 mill cgt in 2012. This is clearly a consequence of a continuously reduced orderbook which has forced yards to cut capacity through shutdown of facili-ties and reduced work force.

Shipyard capacity is flexible and is adjusted as a consequence of profitability. The downturn in global shipping markets since 2008 has reduced demand for new tonnage, thereby forcing yards to cut prices. Consequently, profitability has fallen and yard capacity has been reduced. Newbuilding price development in the past year has not resulted in surging profits; only, for many, changed results from negative to slightly positive. Compared to a rising cost base and unfavorable currency fluctuations, Korean and Chinese yards are some distance from increasing building capacity in a short-term perspective, unless they decide to allocate available offshore capacity to conventional shipbuilding. Japanese yards are in a different position, increasing competitiveness from the weak yen, which is also reflected in the share of contracts claimed during 2014. However, capacity growth in Japan is mainly possible through pro-ductivity gains and, as Japan is already on the high end of that scale, there is not much potential for added capacity. We therefore expect global yard capacity to remain at a steady level through 2015, around 38 mill cgt annually.

Evaluating yard capacity, order books and deliveries also draws attention to the substantial number of vessels that are not being delivered according to schedule; the so-called slippage. This is relevant in all main segments, and particularly for tankers. While the order book at the end of 2013 indicated that 22.2 mill dwt of tankers were due for delivery in 2014, records show that only 16.4 mill dwt actually hit the water. This means that a noteworthy 26 percent were never delivered according to plan.

Similarly, 58.4 mill dwt of dry bulk tonnage was scheduled for 2014 delivery, but only 46.5 mill dwt, or 80 percent, were delivered. The situation was somewhat better for container ships, where 84 per-cent, or 1.5 of the 1.8 mill TEU scheduled for delivery, left the yards.

This trend has been going on ever since 2010 although we see some improvement in performance during the past two years. One

would expect that orders that were not delivered according to plan one year would be delivered the following year, and thereby reduce slippage rates a year later. However, as slippage volumes remain quite high over many years this is an indication that there are many officially reported contracts that are actually never going to be deliv-ered. This could be for various reasons; contracts may simply have been cancelled, which the yard is not very interested in reporting, or options may have been registered as firm orders but never declared. A substantial number of orders also remain with distressed Chinese yards which may not be able to perform. With the vast number of orders at smaller, Chinese yards it is a challenging task to verify which are actually going to be delivered, and when.

BUILDING COSTDuring the past year the building cost for ships has been impacted by fluctuations in currency exchange rates as well as a reduction in steel prices. As discussed above, Japanese yards benefit from a weak-ening of the yen, which has moved from around 100 JPY/USD in early 2014 to close to 120 JPY/USD at year-end. With most of the cost in yen and export contracts in dollar this has made a significant impact on the cost for Japanese yards. Steel prices, however, have not moved much for the Japanese as they are obliged to purchase steel domestically where prices have remained fairly stable in the same period.

Korean and Chinese yards, on the other hand, have not enjoyed weaker currencies, but may purchase steel at world market prices. Reduced prices for iron ore and coking coal have impacted on the price for ship steel too; our steel plate price index fell by 8 percent in 2013 and another 20 percent in 2014. Our rough building cost esti-mates indicate that the cost of building tankers has been reduced by around 7 percent in China and Korea during 2014, and the cost of bulk carriers has been reduced by around 7 percent in China and Japan.

OUTLOOKDemand growth for the global merchant fleet is estimated at 4 per-cent in 2014, which is below our forecasts a year ago. This is mainly due to weaker than expected development of GDP and seaborne dry bulk trade; however, most segments have developed weaker market conditions than we had forecasted. Our forecast for global

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

$/ton

DELIVERIES, NEW ORDERS AND ORDERBOOKS BY VESSEL TYPE WORLD MARKET PRICE FOR HEAVY STEEL PLATES 2005–201410 MM +

Deliveries New orders Order book Percent of Type Capacity 2014 2014 end 2014 fleet end 2014

Tankers Mill dwt 16.4 24.1 63.4 13.8

Bulk carriers Mill dwt 46.5 66.9 146.0 19.7

Container ships Mill TEU 1.52 1.15 3.25 17.9

LNG Mill cbm 4.8 11.6 21.7 35.4

LPG Mill cbm 1.04 4.97 9.91 52.2

Car carriers 1,000 CEU 155 125 366 10.0

Chemical carriers Mill dwt 0.2 1.0 3.9 4.9

Cruise 1,000 berths 18.0 56.7 106.1 20.2

tonnage demand growth in 2015 is 5 percent, based on our segment analyses.

The global merchant fleet is expected to grow by 4–5 percent in 2015, slightly less than last year and well below the average 7 per-cent annual growth during the past decade. Consequently, average fleet capacity utilization should improve from 84 percent last year to around 85 percent in 2015. Preliminary forecasts for 2016 indicate a continuation of this positive development, albeit at a slightly slower pace.

With capacity utilization remaining well below 90 percent, which we define as full capacity utilization, and freight rates still below break-even in most segments, we do not anticipate that the volume of new shipyard orders will surpass the estimated yard capacity. Slightly higher expectations to freight markets indi-cate that our freight rate index will continue to increase, although

modestly. Based on the historical correlation between the rate index and new orders, we forecast new order volumes at 41–42 mill cgt in 2015. This is close to our estimated yard capacity.

Given the above assumptions the average newbuilding price index for 2015 should remain in the same range as in 2014, with the likelihood of minor variations throughout the year. Uncertainties are mainly linked to the potential for further weakening of freight markets. New environmental regulations impacting newbuildings, such as Tier-III engines for vessels keel-laid after 1 January 2016 with corresponding price premium, are not expected to generate much added demand under the prevailing market conditions.

OLE GUSTAV ERIKSENRS Platou Economic Research

THE SHIPBUILDING MARKET

Japan Marine United, Ariake Shipyard


34 35

M O B I L E O F F S H O R E D R I L L I N G U N I T S

2014: THE DECLINE OF THE OFFSHORE RIG MARKETDAY RATES/UTILIZATION: REVIEW OF THE YEARThe jack-up market remained tight in 2014, despite a decidedly weakening trend in fundamentals becoming more visible as the year progressed. We observed that the active utilization of modern Independent Cantilever units (built >1998, modern units) averaged 94 percent in 2014, a drop of only two percentage points compared to 2013. Meanwhile, the active utilization of older Independent Cantilever units (built <1998, standard units) dropped on average four percentage points from 2013, averaging 90 percent in 2014. As the total active jack-up fleet started to weaken, day rates of both standard and modern units also began to tail off. Global average day rates of standard units started the year at $141,000 per day and decreased 15 percent to $120,000 per day by the end of the year. Cor-respondingly, global average day rates of modern units started 2014 at $164,000 per day and decreased by 13 percent to end the year at $143,000 per day. On an annual average basis day rates were largely unchanged.

The floater market’s weakening fundamentals were more pro-nounced and all major market indicators were flashing red through-out 2014. Floater fixing activity declined by 25 percent in 2014 and totaled 130 rig years. This comes on the back of a steep decline in fix-ing activity in 2013. As a result, the once huge contract backlog has withered and both utilizations and day rates came under increasing downward pressure in 2014. Our records show that active floater

utilization declined four percentage points in 2014 and averaged 91 percent. A further breakdown of the floater fleet shows that the active utilizations of the floater sub-segments were all in decline. Ultra-deepwater (UDW) units dropped three percentage points to 95 percent, while the active utilization of Deep-water (DW) units dropped seven percentage points to 85 percent. Finally, the Mid- water (MW) units dropped four percentage points to 89 percent in 2014. Global day rate averages reflected the active utilizations and, on an annual basis, UDW units dropped 11 percent, DW units dropped 7 percent and MW units dropped 14 percent.

DEMANDThe level of Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU) fixing activity weakened considerably in 2014 and even more so than the decline in oil and gas revenues predicted (oil and gas revenues have histori-cally been a solid predictor of fixing activity). It was clear that even before the decline in oil prices, which started mid-2014, oil and gas companies had to introduce large measures of capital discipline in order to ameliorate poor returns. Moreover, as many oil and gas companies have been unsustainably cash flow negative (mainly financed by more debt and sales of assets) upstream investments were further impacted upon. Finally, the shift of E&P spending to onshore, mainly due to the emergence of shale oil plays and higher risk of returns offshore, led to diminishing demand for MODUs

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

No. of rigs Utilization rate (%)

Total supply Active supply Demand Active utilization

70

110

90

130

150

170

190

210

200

300

250

350

400

450

500

550

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

No. of rigs Utilization rate (%)

Total supply Active supply Demand Active utilization

MARKET DEVELOPMENT 2005–2014 FLOATERS

MARKET DEVELOPMENT 2005–2014 JACK-UPS


and lower fixing activity. At the end of the year fixing activity of MODUs fell to a recorded 452 rig years, a decrease of 30 percent compared to 2013.

Jack-up fixing activity dropped significantly in 2014 and the end of the year tally showed that contracts with a total duration of 325 rig years were fixed, a year-on-year decrease of 32 percent. The lower fixing activity in 2014 cut jack-up demand growth in half compared to 2013. Nevertheless, the number of jack-ups on contract still increased and averaged 423 units in 2014, a 5 percent jump compared to the previous year. Demand increases for jack-ups were mixed across the regional markets. Clearly, the Middle East was driving demand (+12 percent), while demand in other pre-vious growth markets, such as Asia-Pacific (+3 percent) and Gulf of Mexico (+4 percent), slowed down to single digit growth and, in some regions, such as West Africa (-20 percent), a decline in demand was actually recorded. Jack-up demand growth was clearly aligning itself with the weakening cyclical components of demand. However, development drilling of older fields, such as in the Middle East, was supporting jack-up demand. Time critical drilling of older fields is necessary to support reservoir pressure and hence produc-tion, unless of course these fields are to be shut down. This type of development drilling supports jack-up demand and has grown over the last years at close to 4 percent p.a. without much volatility.

The number of floaters on contract also increased in 2014, but growth slowed to a trickle, rising by only four units or 1.5 percent. Floater demand grew unevenly across both the different types of units and regions of operation. UDW units were clearly crowding out older units. The number of UDW units on contract in 2014 rose by 12 units, while the number of MW and DW units on contract decreased by three and four units respectively. In terms of region of operation, Brazilian demand continued to slide and decreased by another 10 percent in 2014. On the other hand, the number of floaters on contract grew in Gulf of Mexico (9 percent), Asia-Pacific (11 percent) and West/East Africa (12 percent). Fixing activity of floaters (as measured in rig years), which is a more forward-looking indicator, decreased again in 2014 and was 25 percent lower than in 2013. The accumulated length of contracts signed in 2014 was 130 rig years, significantly below the 256 floaters on contract at the end

of 2014. Fixing activity in the different floater segments was nega-tive across the board. We estimate fixing activity of UDW units decreased 12 percent, while fixing activity of MW and DW units declined 50 percent and 21 percent respectively.

Despite the long string of major deep-water discoveries in numerous basins, deep-water developments are for the time being out of favor with oil and gas companies and, as a consequence, floater demand is negatively impacted. As with jack-up demand, floaters were increasingly being hit by weakening cyclical factors in 2014, but the critical issue is that as deep-water developments have become more complex to develop, the risk of cost overruns and delays have also increased. At the same time other parts of the E&P industry, such as shale oil, have managed to decrease costs through improved productivity and thus made themselves relatively more attractive for investment.

FLEET TRENDJack-up active fleet growth in 2014 was solid and increased 9 percent, compared to the 8 percent rise of 2013. We recorded 38 deliveries in 2014, which is only slightly below what the orderbook indicated at the start of the year. Three units were removed from the fleet and we also recorded a number of units being reactivated from cold stack-ing. At the start of the year owners were still placing plenty of orders at the yards, but as downside risk to the market increased through the year new orders slowed down markedly. Only 10 new contracts were placed in the second half of 2014. The final tally shows that orders placed at yards were down almost 50 percent year-on-year, from 74 units in 2013 to 38 units in 2014.

We estimate the average active floater fleet to have expanded by 17 units, or 6 percent, in 2014. As with 2013 some delays of newbuilds, especially semi-submersibles, were noted, mainly as a consequence of bottlenecks among key equipment manufacturers. However, owners were also starting to ask for delays as a consequence of the weakening floater market. In other words, supply dynamics began to increase to compensate for a more challenging floater market. The newbuilding market for floaters was also less active in 2014, with six drillships and three semi-submersibles ordered, compared to 15 drillships and seven semi-submersibles in 2013. Furthermore,

$1,000 per day

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Jackup, high spec Midwater Deepwater UDW Jackup, 300 ft

Mill $

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Jackup (350 ft Premium) Semi (harsh environment)

Drillship (10,000 ft WD) Jackup (400 ft Premium)

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

DAY RATE FOR RIGS 2005–2014 NEWBUILDING PRICES FOR RIGS 2005–2014


36 37

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

backlog, nearly 120 floaters, or 40 percent of the actively marketed floater fleet, will come off contract from the fourth quarter of 2015 and the end of the second quarter of 2016. New fixing activity is unlikely to absorb these units and therefore the number of floaters on contract is likely to drop through 2016. Our estimates indicate that we could see a 10 to 15 percent drop in floaters on contract in 2016. Floater demand is inherently linked to the success of devel-oping deep-water reserves. As is well-known, cost issues, timing issues and other relatively more attractive investments have moved deep-water projects down the OGCs’ pecking order of investments. Industry productivity and lower costs are needed to raise the attrac-tiveness of offshore projects. Moreover, the current withdrawal of OGCs’ oil service demand, resulting in lower oil service prices is, however, not entirely the same as industry productivity. Cost issues could easily resurface if the underlying problems are not remedied, thus holding back long-term floater demand.

Fleet trendThe current jack-up orderbook indicates that 69 units will be deliv-ered in 2015 and 68 units in 2016. In other words, at the same time as market fundamentals are weakening the jack-up fleet could poten-tially face an expansion of 26 percent within the space of two years. It is clear that owners will need to adjust their fleets in order to accom-modate the influx of tonnage. As we have already observed, con-tracts of new units will dwindle, while owners will adjust delivery schedules and attempt to cancel units. Many units have, of course, tail-heavy installments and at the end of the day some yards could sit with the problem. Some jack-ups have also been contracted by owners with limited operational capability and first deployment of the units could prove challenging. Finally, it seems unavoidable that owners will have to adjust fleets through removals/scrapping. This is, however, not likely to happen before owners feel the pain of lower utilization and earnings. Accelerated removals/scrapping is therefore unlikely before the second half of 2015 and through 2016. At the end of the day, we estimate the total jack-up fleet to grow by close to 8 percent in 2015, but as scrapping accelerates fleet growth is expected to be lower in 2016 and average 4 percent.

Despite the current floater orderbook indicating that 30 units will be delivered in 2015 and 22 units in 2016, the fleet count is unlikely to rise much in the same period. As owners are well aware, increased supply dynamics are needed to rebalance the sharply dropping market. New orders have already disappeared, delivery schedules are being drawn out and several owners are announcing the intention of removing tonnage permanently from the market. The floater fleet is therefore expected to grow by a mere 2 percent in both 2015 and 2016.

CONCLUSIONSIt is inevitable that MODU utilizations will decline over the next two years. With regards to jack-ups, active utilization is estimated to approach 80 percent by 2016. The sharpest decline will take place in 2015, with active utilization likely to level off in 2016. Active floater utilization will probably see the sharpest fall in 2016 and could drop to 70–75 percent that year (unless supply dynamics increase sharply). Competition for employment will be fierce and day rates

several floater owners began to remove/scrap surplus tonnage. In total, owners announced that they intend to remove/scrap 18 floaters, or nearly 6 percent of the floater fleet.

MARKET PROSPECTS Fixing activity and rig demandThe recent precipitous drop in oil prices, combined with cost issues within OGCs, is likely to put further downwards pressure on fixing activity and the resultant demand for MODUs. Given the contin-ued close link between oil and gas companies’ incomes and the level of rig fixing activity (R2=0.92), and assuming oil prices averaging USD 75 in 2015, fixing activity could drop an additional 30 percent in 2015, which leaves downside given today’s oil prices.

Jack-up fixing activity and the resultant demand will face a high degree of risk in 2015/16. In terms of drilling drivers, exploration drilling is likely to stay muted as a consequence of maturity of the shallow water basins and, to a greater extent, as a result of the drop-ping oil prices. Lower oil prices are also slowing down new fields entering the development stage. Continued increases in jack-up demand hinges therefore on increased focus on the redevelopment of older fields. It should be noted that the number of new fields being developed exceeds those being decommissioned. However, the breaking point of where redevelopment/maintenance dril-ling becomes unprofitable and OGCs decide to move towards the decommissioning phase must be getting close in some cases. The impact of lower oil prices on jack-up demand is likely to take effect from the start of the year (2015). History has shown it takes approx-imately six months for a change in oil prices to take effect on jack-up demand. Given the above, demand is expected to decrease 5 percent in 2015, before recovering to a growth of 4 percent in 2016, contin-gent on oil prices readjusting upwards.

It seems inevitable that floater demand will be challenged in 2015 and especially 2016. Floater fixing activity is likely to stay subdued and significantly below the actively marketed fleet. Thus, the once huge contract backlog will wither further in 2015 and 2016. As a consequence, floater demand growth in 2015 is likely to be on the negative side and we are currently estimating demand could drop by 2 to 3 percent. Furthermore, due to the structure of the floater

Mill $

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

300 ft JU 80s 350 ft JU 2000+

2nd Gen 4th Gen 6th Gen

MARKET VALUE OF RIGS 2005–2014


will fall. We estimate day rates for modern jack-ups to move down to $100–110,000 per day, a drop of 30 percent. Day rates for older standard jack-ups will experience a similar percentage drop, but net earnings will be even lower due to lower utilization. This may be the trigger for scrapping/removals of the many older jack-ups. Floater day rates will also fall and contracts for UDW units are likely to drop to $275–350,000 per day. With increased availability contract

length and lead times will also become shorter, and it will not be uncommon to sign both jack-up and floater contracts on a well-by-well basis.

SVEN MELSOM ZIEGLERRS Platou Offshore Research

RIG MARKET KEY FIGURES

AV E R A G E Y E A R 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4

Oil price (Brent, $/barrel) 24.0 17.2 28.1 55.2 97.4 61.9 79.4 111.0 112.0 108.5 99.0

Gas price (Henry Hub, $/bcf) 1.6 1.8 4.6 9.0 8.8 3.9 4.4 4.0 2.8 3.7 4.4

Total rig demand 417 387 424 487 540 504 509 599 601 657 681

Total rig supply 546 517 553 565 605 642 681 743 742 770 823

Rig utilization (on total supply) 76.4% 75.0% 76.7% 86.1% 89.5% 79.2% 75.3% 80.6% 81.1% 85.3% 82.8%

Copyright: Seadrill


38 39

T H E O F F S H O R E S U P P O RT V E S S E L ( O S V ) M A R K E T

COMING DOWN

THE NORTH SE A PSV MARKETWe estimate PSV utilization to have risen 2 percent in 2014, averaging 92 percent through the year. Large PSVs achieved a utiliza-tion rate of 96 percent, in line with 2013-levels, while medium-sized vessels increased to 90 percent from 84 percent in 2013. Smaller vessels also achieved higher utilization, averaging 87 percent for the year, compared to 82 percent in 2013.

Despite higher utilization, the North Sea PSV fleet did not grow in 2014, marking a stark contrast to the fleet development seen every year since 2007. At the beginning of 2014, there were 240 PSVs in the North Sea, whereas the year closed with 239 PSVs in the region. Fleet development has been flat through the year, with no notable spikes or slumps in the number of vessels. The market has also seen a very low contracting level through 2014, with the number of PSV years fixed at its lowest level since the aftermath of the financial crisis in 2009. This is clearly illustrative

of a softening market, where charterers face low risk of tightening capacity, and rather prefer to fix vessels on shorter-term contracts or utilize the spot market.

The rising utilization rates were further not reflected in day rates, marking another contrast to typical market behavior. We estimate the small PSVs to have seen a slight increase in average term charter rates (up 5 percent on average for the year), whereas rates for medium-sized PSVs declined on average 4 percent, while large PSVs fell 6 percent. Rates remained decent at the beginning of the year, but started dropping off significantly in the second half. The latest rate indications and fixtures are also further down from 2014 average levels, with about 15 percent, and we expect rates to continue to drop in line with a softer market balance forward.

Average spot market rates have also been lower for PSVs through 2014, compared to 2013. Spot market rates for small- and

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

8-10,000 BHP 10-16,000 BHP 16-20,000 BHP 20,000+ BHP

£1,000 per day

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

1,500–2,199 DWT 500–749 m2 deck area 2,200–3,099 DWT

750–899 m2 deck area 3,100+ DWT 900+ m2 deck area

£1,000 per day

NORTH SEA TONNAGE 2005–2014AHTS AVERAGE T/C RATES (REPORTED AND ESTIMATED)

NORTH SEA TONNAGE 2005–2014PSV AVERAGE T/C RATES (REPORTED AND ESTIMATED)

The North Sea PSV-market remained decent throughout 2014 when considering average numbers, albeit with somewhat mixed developments. However, towards the end of the year, we saw the market increasingly start to come down, with both term rates and spot rates dropping off sharply.

THE OFFSHORE SUPPORT VESSEL MARKET

medium-sized vessels have on average been around 15 percent lower than in 2013, whereas rates for large PSVs have on average been 20 percent lower.

INTERNATIONAL OSV DEMAND (PSV>1000DW T + AHTS 4–9,999 BHP) In spite of an increasingly challenging market also globally during the second half of 2014, there was a higher average number of vessels working through the year compared to 2013. We estimate global OSV demand to have increased by around 5 percent during 2014, largely driven by increased rig activity. On a global basis the rig count increased by 4 percent, with jack-ups on contract rising 5 percent and floaters climbing 1.5 percent. Increasing offshore activity clearly contributed to the absorption of significant OSV fleet growth. The global OSV fleet is estimated to have grown by 8 percent in 2014, thus significantly outpacing demand growth. A further breakdown shows that the PSV fleet grew by 13 percent and the AHTS 4–9,999 bhp fleet (cargo work being the mainstay for this type of vessel) increased by 4 percent in 2014. Average day rates through the year were relatively unchanged in most regions, but with slight regional variations. Softening rate levels towards year-end have, however, started to materialize in most regions, perhaps with the exception of PSV rates in Brazil, and both AHTS and PSV rates in the US Gulf of Mexico.

OSV DEMAND GROW TH FALLINGWith the steep fall in oil prices and heightened capital disci-pline focus amongst the oil and gas companies, we expect future demand growth for OSVs to come down strongly. Demand for OSVs is driven by production support, rig support and, to some extent, offshore and subsea construction support. Continuous production support is by far the most important driver for OSVs, whereas rig support is the main driver for the AHTS segment (see separate comment on AHTS below). We currently estimate demand growth to about 2 percent for OSVs, both for 2015 and for 2016, mainly driven by increased production support as on-

going field developments come to completion and new produc-tion is brought on-stream. Rig support is anticipated to drop, thus contributing negatively. Note that our estimates have steadily been revised down during the second half of 2014, in line with the rig market coming down. If this continues at a faster pace for-ward than we currently estimate, there could very well be further downside to our current demand growth expectations. We also note that the estimated demand growth for 2015–2016 is at the lowest level since 2002, when demand stood still. Even during the financial crisis in 2008–2009, demand grew by 7–8 percent.

REMAINING FLEET GROW TH STILL SIGNIFICANTOSV fleet growth further looks set to remain high, with the order book scheduled for delivery in 2015 and 2016 (and beyond) currently standing at 514 vessels, of which 373 are PSVs and 141 are small AHTS (4,000–9,999 BHP). Compared to the exist-ing fleet of around 2,900 OSVs, this corresponds to a continued fleet growth of roughly 18 percent. Of the 514 newbuilds, 399 are scheduled for delivery in 2015 and 115 in 2016, corresponding to 14 percent and 3.5 percent fleet growth respectively.

Historically, we have seen a net slippage of around 30 percent, which should imply that a fair share of deliveries scheduled for 2015 will be pushed out in time. Increased market uncertainty across oil services, financing challenges, speculative orders and orders placed at inexperienced yards, e.g. in Asia, should also lead to some cancellations going forward, as well as deliveries being further postponed. Improving productivity as the yards in general gain more experience, combined with easing pressure along the supply chain, should to some extent counter these effects. In sum, we assume net slippage to be roughly in line with previous years, i.e. around 30 percent.

Applying this to the current orderbook numbers, we are likely to see around 280 OSVs delivered in 2015, corresponding to 10 percent fleet growth. Furthermore, using the same assumptions, around 200 vessels should be delivered in 2016, implying another 6 percent fleet growth. Note that these estimates assume no vessel

AHTS/PSV NEW ORDERS 2005–2014 AHTS/PSV FLEET OVERVIEW, END 2014

N O . O F V E S S E L S I N S E R V I C E O R D E R B O O K

AHTS 4–7,999 BHP 1,213 130

AHTS 8–9,999 BHP 221 36

AHTS 10–15,999 BHP 318 60

AHTS 16–19,999 BHP 119 9

AHTS 20,000+ BHP 78 21

AHTS Total 1,949 256

PSV ‹500 m2 415 71

PSV 500–749 m2 511 93

PSV 750–899 m2 147 129

PSV 900+ m2 379 111

PSV Total 1,452 404

Total Fleet/Orderbook 3,401 660AHTS PSV

0

50

100

150

200

250

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

No. of vessels

40 41

attrition and no further orders placed. Both elements are likely unrealistic, and we estimate vessel attrition to increase moving forward, whereas ordering activity is likely to come down.

Ordering activity for OSV newbuilds remained high through-out 2014, in spite of the market starting to come down during the second half of the year. In total, we estimate 271 OSVs to have been ordered, consisting of 191 PSVs and 80 small AHTS vessels. This implies an ordering activity roughly in line with previous years, with 290 OSVs ordered in 2013 and 273 OSVs in 2012.

UTILIZ ATION AND DAY R ATES E XPECTED TO DROPWith demand growth expected to fall strongly and fleet growth estimated to remain high, we expect utilization and charter rates to drop further in 2015 and 2016. We have already started to see this materialize, with charter contracts late 2014 and early 2015 entered into at rates significantly below 2014 averages. On average,

we currently expect 2015 charter rates to drop 15–20 percent for OSVs, compared to 2014 average levels. We also estimate rates to drop slightly further in 2016. Our estimates naturally vary some-what across regions and vessel specifications, but there are no regions where we expect positive rate development during 2015.

THE NORTH-SE A AHTS MARKET (>10,000BHP)The North Sea AHTS market also remained decent through 2014, but with somewhat mixed development, as for the OSV segment. We saw a strong reduction in the active AHTS fleet, but without utilization seeing any meaningful improvement. Term and spot rates were nevertheless largely unchanged on average, with slight variances. As usual, weather conditions have also in 2014 been highly important, leading to periods of unforeseen tightening of the market balance and coherent spot rate spikes.


RIG MARKET SUPPORTIVE OF AHTS ACTIVITY THROUGH 2014Activity in the North Sea rig market increased in 2014 compared to 2013, measured by the number of rigs on contract, and was thus supportive of the AHTS market. At the beginning of 2014, we observed a total of 89 MODUs on contract in the Greater North Sea, of which 41 were jack-ups and 48 floaters. This increased to 98 units during the course of the year, an increase of nine units. The number of active MODUs in the Norwegian and UK North Sea also increased through 2014, from 68 at the beginning of the year to 75 at year end, an increase of seven units. Six of these units came on the UK side, whereas the Norwegian side increased by one unit. Note that the numbers above correspond to rigs on con-tract and do not take into account temporarily suspended rigs.

Exxon/Rosneft’s drilling campaign in the Kara Sea was also strongly supportive for the North Sea AHTS market during 2014, utilizing a high number of large AHTS vessels for part of the year, and contributing to tightening of the market balance. Due to the current sanctions impacting Arctic activities in Russia, we currently do not expect a corresponding campaign and effect in 2015.

The underlying trend of increased pre-lay activity and more efficient rig moves (caused by better planning and more efficient vessels) also continues to impact AHTS demand growth negatively, despite an increase in the number of rigs on contract. We expect this trend to sustain forward, continuing to have a dampening effect on vessel demand.

FLEET, UTILIZ ATION AND R ATE DE VELOPMENT IN 2014The North Sea AHTS fleet dropped strongly during 2014, from around 75 units at the beginning of the year to around 59 units by year end. The number of AHTS vessels on term contracts increased by three vessels during the year, while the spot fleet decreased from 38 to 21 units. The North Sea AHTS fleet has declined gradually since early 2011, but the reduction observed in 2014 is stronger than in any of the preceding years, and fleet size is currently back at 2007–2009 levels.

The strong fleet reduction was not sufficient to improve vessel utilization, and we estimate average utilization through 2014 at 62 percent, down slightly from 65 percent in 2013. The 10–15,999 BHP category is estimated to have dropped to 45 percent from 57 per-cent in 2013, while the 16–19,999 BHP category dropped slightly less, from 71 percent in 2013 to an estimated 68 percent in 2014. Finally, we estimate utilization for the largest vessels (20,000 BHP+) to have increased slightly, from 66 percent in 2013 to 71 percent in 2014.

Average day rates also displayed a somewhat mixed develop-ment. Term charter rates were largely unchanged for the 10–15,999 BHP and 16–19,999 BHP categories, while the 20,000+ BHP cate-gory saw term rates increase on average by 8–9 percent. Note however that there have been very few term fixtures in the market, and the rate increase for the largest vessels likely to some extent reflects the high rate levels achieved for Kara Sea contracts. Spot market rates displayed the opposite development, with average rates for the year being up 13–18 percent for the small and mid-sized categories (10–19,999 BHP) and down some 7–8 percent on average for the largest vessel category (20,000+ BHP).

TOUGH TIMES AHE ADLooking ahead, the North Sea AHTS market clearly appears chal-lenging. A significant number of rigs are scheduled to come off firm contracts both on the Norwegian and UK side of the North Sea during 2015. As for the rest of the world, North Atlantic fixing activity has also been depressed through 2014. During the second half of 2014, we further saw Statoil cancel one rig contract and suspend four rigs in Norway, while ConocoPhillips exercised early termination clauses on two jack-ups on the UK side. We do not rule out the potential for further suspensions and/or early contract terminations in 2015.

The strong oil price drop has further reduced oil companies’ demand for exploration drilling, and we expect the number of North Sea exploration wells to come down in 2015. Sanctioning of new field developments is also likely to remain subdued as long as the oil price remains at low levels, which will impact development drilling in both 2015 and 2016. Against this backdrop, we expect few rig contract options to be exercised, accompanied by further depressed fixing activity. There are also a highly limited number of new contracted rigs expected to enter the North Sea and start drilling during 2015.

At the same time, we are seeing reduced demand for the large AHTS vessels, also internationally, with, for example, Petrobras recently cancelling an important tender. More vessels coming off contracts internationally will likely find their way to the North Sea spot market, as vessel owners have few other places to trade large AHTS vessels. Arctic campaigns (e.g. Greenland, Russia) have in the previous years absorbed significant capacity in the high-end of the AHTS market, but such campaigns also seem highly unlikely for the foreseeable future.

Future fleet growth remains highly limited, and we estimate the large AHTS fleet to grow by 2–3 percent in both 2015 and 2016 (disregarding potential vessel attrition). This is naturally positive, but with the strong expected demand reduction, we nevertheless forecast utilization and rates to come down strongly.

THE INTERNATIONAL AHTS MARKETSThe international markets for large AHTS vessels largely mirror development in the North Sea, but are more tilted towards jack-up support, rig towage, FPSO support and offshore construction support. The same forces affecting the North Sea market are, how-ever, expected to also impact international AHTS markets, with reduced rig activity being of particular importance. As for the North Sea, we expect utilization and rates to come down, and vessels to come off contracts. In sum, we currently forecast on average 20–25 percent drop in average rates for large AHTS vessels globally, with a particularly strong drop in the North Sea.

ERIK TØNNERS Platou Offshore Research

THE OFFSHORE SUPPORT VESSEL MARKET


42 43


TIME FOR CONSOLIDATION The RS Platou Markets Group performed at record levels in 2014, despite the major drop in oil prices and relatively weak economic activity. We continued to increase our position in the global shipping ECM market to above 60 per cent mostly due to our activity in the US markets.

From an economic and market perspective, 2014 was dominated by four themes: relatively weak economic activity (outside the US and UK), falling oil prices (a decline of almost 50 percent since the June peak), lower inflation expectations (and, with them, lower govern-ment bond yields), and a rise in the US dollar.

Since late June 2014 we have seen a 55 percent plus drop in the Brent oil price to around USD 50 a barrel. The sharp decline has been driven by OPEC’s quest for a higher global market share, softening demand in China, Europe and Japan, increased US onshore production, and slightly lower global demand. At the time of writing, the oil price stands at USD 57 per barrel.

Meanwhile, both the stock and bond markets performed far better than we expected at the beginning of the year. While the markets were occasionally turbulent, we were spared a full-blown stock market correction. For the year, the S&P 500 was up 11.4 percent and the bond market has also seen smart gains, with US Treasuries returning 6.2 percent this year – on track for the best performance since 2011, according to the Bloomberg US Treasury Bond Index.

The gap between yields available in cash or government bonds and the dividend yield in equities is extreme by historical com-parison, particularly across Europe. While confidence in the sus-tainability of dividends has been dented by the financial crisis, the large companies are now flush with cash and generally have strong balance sheets. This will set the scene for consolidation in the energy markets, as the rich stand to survive the challenging markets ahead.

For RS Platou Markets, 2014 was a very good year, especially within the shipping sector. At the end of the year, RS Platou Mar-kets had raised a total of 4.2 bill USD to shipping companies globally, out of a total of 6.9 bill USD globally. This constitutes a 61 percent market share, compared to a 44 percent market share in 2013.

Global IPO volume reached 263.3 bill USD in 2014, up 52 per-cent from 173.5 bill USD in 2013, and was the highest IPO volume since 2010 according to Dealogic. The volume was driven by Alibaba

Group Holding Ltd’s 25 bill USD IPO on NYSE in September, which stands as the biggest IPO globally on record. Global DCM volume totaled 6.29 trill USD in 2014, up 3 percent from 6.13 trill USD in 2013. Activity fell 2 percent to 20,351 deals, bringing the average deal size to 309 mill USD, the highest annual average on record.

Overall in 2014, RS Platou Markets participated in 26 transactions, divided over 16 equity deals and seven debt transactions, compared to 30 transactions during 2013. In addition, RS Platou Markets managed three M&A transactions and advisory assign-ments of various structures. The RS Platou Group raised a total of 5.5 bill USD to companies within our core sectors in 2014, down 30 percent from 7.4 bill USD in 2013. Despite a lower transaction volume, revenues and costs were maintained at 2013 levels.

With the acquisition of the Platou Group, the RS Platou Markets Group is in process of integrating with the Capital Markets Group of Clarkson, forming a strong and diversified investment banking arm of the consolidated company with a continued focus on our core sectors and a strong presence in the US. With our full set of licenses we have taken on transactions as Sole Lead or Lead Manager in US deals, increasing our visibility and presence, a posi-tion we intend to cultivate during 2015.

OUTLOOK FOR 2015 We believe that 2015 will continue to be a constructive year, but with bumps and turns throughout, as markets should be more volatile. We expect investors to retain their risk appetite, as some good bar-gains may appear despite the lagging Eurozone economy and low oil prices. The US economy will still be strong, which will drive the expectation of a stronger and higher dollar.

We expect the market pricing to ease further in Europe while we might see the Fed in the US hiking interest rates for the first time since 2006. A sign of a divided growth picture is German 10-year government bonds yielding 0.44 percent, while the equivalent yield in the US is 1.84 percent. Furthermore, a EUR/USD exchange rate of 1.16, the lowest since 2003, is a sign that all is not

R S P L ATO U M A R K E T S

great within the Eurozone. Greece has again emerged as a point of worry, as the Parliament failed to elect a new President at year-end 2014. The ECB is likely to remain in the headlines, while another national bank will be closely watched. The Swiss National Bank kicked off 2015 by releasing the CHF from the EUR and dropping interest rates to a negative 0.75 percent. On the other side of the globe, China seems to be holding up fairly well. Along with most of the developed economies, China is estimated to see a significant GDP growth effect related to the reduced oil prices.

Record low oil prices will force major companies to curb their ambitions, whereas lesser names will struggle to break even. We are expecting to see consolidation and acquisitions in the market and the survival of the richest. Highly leveraged exploration and pro-duction companies, as well as equipment providers, will be in for a very difficult 2015.

Despite the sharp drop, we remain positive that we will see a rebound in the oil price in the second half of 2015. We forecast an average oil price for 2015 of USD 75 a barrel and expect the rebound to be driven by a general slowdown in US oil production, combined

with an increased demand driven by lower oil price.The drop in the oil price has led to an expected decline in 2015

E&P spending of more than 10 percent. This will have a negative effect on all oil services sub segments that are already struggling with a significant oversupply. This is particularly evident within offshore drilling and the OSV sector. A reverse of the current E&P spending trend is dependent on a strong rebound in the oil price. However, we expect the spending slowdown to lead to an accele- ration of consolidation and restructuring within the oil services industry sub-segments.

OPEC’s quest for higher market share has been very positive for the international tanker market for both near term and for long term growth prospects. Spot VLCC rates have consistently been at the highest level since 2008 since the summer of 2014, while one year charter rates have reached the highest levels in 5 years. For 2015, the tanker market is accommodating the favorable demand out-look with the lowest fleet growth in 13 years. This, combined with investor’s search for liquidity and scale, will also give room for an active 2015 especially within the M&A market.

RS PLATOU MARKETS


44 45


NORWEGIAN KS MARKET GAINING MOMENTUM2014 was a very positive year in shipping project finance, as transaction volume and total market size improved significantly.

Although freight rates for most shipping segments (with the exclu-sion of LPG, and recently crude and product tankers) have not been fantastic, it has been possible to structure and place projects. In 2014, the majority of the shipping projects in the market focused on historically low asset prices as well as profit split structures to secure investors attractive entry points before an eventual recovery.

In offshore, most projects were structured as long-term sale-leaseback deals with a solid dividend yield.

The main macroeconomic event of 2014 was undoubtedly the major fall in the oil price in Q4. This has already had a widespread impact on the global markets, and is expected to have a positive effect on world economic growth.

In the oil and gas services sector, a low oil price has put further pressure on day rates for OSVs, as oil companies have postponed new investments and are in cost cutting mode. It is clear that increased liquidity will be in focus for offshore companies going forward and looking to weather the storm. In these situations, a sale-leaseback structure could work well in order to release equity while retaining commercial and technical control.

In last year’s report we commented that it was challenging to get debt finance for projects, as banks were focusing on existing customers and resolving problem loans. In 2014, banks have been

more interested in financing shipping and offshore projects, as there is intense competition for the same clients on the corpo-rate loan side. The higher margins and lower leverage in the pro-ject market has become more and more attractive to lenders. As a result of more competition among banks for projects, we have seen a reduction in their pricing by about 75 bps. The pricing for loans in projects now ranges between 250–450 bps.

In both shipping and offshore we see that there are owners with excellent operational capabilities that have a desire to expand or refinance their fleet, but are lacking the equity. Banks are not willing to finance above 60 percent for most owners, leaving a funding gap and opportunities for sources of alternative financing to come in. A structure that has proven to work well is when investors come in with 20 percent equity and the shipowner contributes the remain-ing 20 percent in the form of Seller’s Credit.

The combination of these market conditions and the increased debt and equity available for project financing could make 2015 the year of the sale-leaseback.

THE NORWEGIAN KS MARKET IN 2014 Last year we saw increased activity in the project market, which we attribute to several factors. While the stock markets performed

R S P L ATO U P R OJ E C T F I N A N C E

TOTAL PROJECTS BY SEGMENTS TOTAL PROJECTS BY EMPLOYMENT

Offshore 40 %

Chemical 13 %

Container 4 %

Other 2 %

Product tankers 19 %

Bulk 13 %

Multipurpose 9 %

83% Bareboat

Timecharter15%

Spot2%

well in 2014, investors are looking to diversify their portfolio by placing some of their funds in well-structured shipping and off-shore projects with cash flow visibility and a solid dividend yield. A low interest rate has also contributed to more equity in the market and a greater demand for investment opportunities within shipping and offshore.

The reported project value among the top four KS houses was about 1.2 bill USD in 2014. This represents a 78 percent increase from last year’s reported activity, continuing a four-year positive growth trend. We observed that the number of deals placed in the market was significantly higher, but that the average deal size was slightly smaller than previous years.

RS PLATOU PROJECT FINANCE PORTFOLIO OF PROJECTSThis year RS Platou Project Finance placed seven new projects through the KS Market and CIT co-operation agreement. In 2013, the combined project value of our new projects was 78 mill USD. For 2014, the total value of shipping and offshore projects placed equaled 250 mill USD. The increased activity is due to a more active market, alongside new and returning sources of equity and debt financing.

In total, RS Platou Project Finance is now the corporate manager for 47 vessels in 26 different projects.

The corporate management also includes some projects limi-ted to pure accounting services. There is a market for professional independent corporate management services and RS Platou Pro-ject Finance has been appointed by several domestic and foreign shipowners to perform this job.

The current portfolio consists of 19 offshore vessels, nine product tankers, six chemical tankers, six bulk carriers, four multipurpose vessels, two container vessels and one veteran passenger ship.

The majority of our existing projects are performing well, allow-ing us to pay out a good amount of dividends to our investors.

ESTABLISHING RS PLATOU PROJECT SALESOn January 1st 2015, RS Platou Project Finance established a new division designated to sourcing equity and increasing liquidity of project shares in the secondhand market. The new focus on sales will allow us to further increase our project activity and deal size. The team will consist of three brokers and a Compliance Officer. Increasing the liquidity in the secondhand market will provide added value to our existing investors and opportunities for new investors to enter existing projects.

CO-OPERATION AGREEMENT WITH CIT MARITIME FINANCE In 2014, we have completed three deals through our co-operation agreement with CIT. These deals involve two dry-bulk vessels and four seismic support newbuildings. The relationship with CIT allows us to compete on large deals with credit-rated counterparts. While many potential leasing deals have been dropped into MLP structures, we still see a growing number of deals in the market where we can be competitive.

Project price Paid in equity Uncalled capital

0 500

1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 Mill $

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

SUMMARY KS HOUSES 2005–2014(FEARNLEYS, NRP, PARETO, PLATOU)

The delivery of FS Cygnus at SIMEK Shipyard in November 2014

RS PLATOU PROJECT FINANCE


46 47


2014 TRANSACTION MARKET FUELED BY CHEAP FINANCING NORWEGIAN MARKET 2014In 2014, RS Platou Real Estate concluded 15 projects with a total investment value of just above 2.2 bill NOK, making 2014 the best year since our inception in 2009. Our subsidiary, RS Platou Property Management, also had a record year, with a net inflow of three new projects in 2014. The company nearly doubled its revenues over the previous year and now manages a portfolio of 14 projects.

In 2013, mid-size transactions dominated the market. In spite of the challenges with a decreasing LTV-ratio and the lack of competition in the banking sector, financing terms and access to capital improved considerably after the difficulties experienced in 2012. The transaction year 2014 has been a continuation of what started in 2013, with sharply declining interest rates and reduced loan margins increasing competition among banks. The access to cheap financing has fueled the investment appetite in the market, leading to major market activity and the completion of a broad range of real estate transactions. For syndicate transactions, bank margins have declined by 50 bps over the year, with interest rates declining even more.

The transaction market is expected to end up at an all-time high, estimated at 75 bill NOK, if the sale of Entra is included. The initial public offering of Entra generated great interest and was fully underwritten when it was listed on 17 October on the Oslo Stock Exchange. The company’s total market value was 11.9 bill NOK, giving the stock a price of 65 NOK. At year’s end 2014, the stock price had increased to 76.50 NOK, providing shareholders with a return of just under 20 percent since first listing.

As in earlier years, professional investors have dominated the equity market and, especially from Q3 and on, there has been a clear tendency towards excess demand in the market. Stakeholders want-ing to realize profits have initiated several of the transactions, and the trend of syndicates being on the sell side has become more evident throughout the year. Nevertheless, it is relevant to note that many projects on the sell side are struggling with negative swap values, making it more challenging for stakeholders to secure profits.

Moreover, foreigners continue to increase their market share after doubling their volume in 2013 and, supported by the weaken-ing of the NOK against foreign currencies, they are expected to be strong contenders for top Oslo CBD properties in the coming year.

MARKET OUTLOOKIn December Norges Bank lowered the key policy rate by 25 bps to 1.25 percent, after the Swedish Central Bank unexpectedly lowered its to zero percent at the end of October. As a result the NOK has weakened, contributing to increased inflation levels and positively influencing investment appetites in real estate. The 5Y swap rate has dropped by 130 bps over the last year and is now at an all-time low.

The reduction of interest rates and loan margins affected the pricing for CBD properties quite quickly, and the ‘target’ prime yield has been downgraded by 50 bps, from 5.25 to 4.75 percent since June. On the other hand, real estate located in the segment between CBD and secondary areas has not experienced similar yield com-pression. In this segment, yield development can be categorized as relatively flat, or there has been a marginal reduction compared to CBD, contributing to an increasing and historically high yield-gap. RS Platou Real Estate has concluded several projects in 2014 that fall into this segment. With the record high yield-gap for normal real estate and with future expectations of continued low interest rates, we consider a yield compression in this segment as likely, add-ing value for our investors.

Going forward, RS Platou Real Estate will focus on both yield-ing and operational projects. Regarding yielding assets, investors focus on annual equity dividend and buildings of high quality, preferably future built. We seek operational projects where an underlying cash flow is combined with the opportunity for further development and/or refurbishment. However, with our newly established sales department, one of our top aims for 2015 is to enhance our distribution capabilities and strengthen our market position in the competition for long-term cash flow projects.

R S P L ATO U R E A L E S TAT E

TRANSACTION VOLUME

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Bill NOK

03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14E Residencekvartalet, Trondheim

RS PLATOU REAL ESTATE


48 49

STATISTICS

1WORLD FLEET DEVELOPMENT

Mill dwt

* F R O M 2 0 1 2 C O M B I N E D C A R R I E R S I N C L .

I N B U L K C A R R I E R F L E E T

2DELIVERIES

Mill dwt

3NEW ORDERS

Mill dwt

TA N K E R SC H E M I C A L C A R R I E R S

B U L KC A R R I E R S

C O M B I N E DC A R R I E R S OT H E R S TOTA L

2005 28.0 1.5 23.1 - 13.8 66.4

2006 23.0 2.4 25.5 - 20.3 71.2

2007 28.7 3.0 24.8 - 23.0 79.5

2008 33.2 2.9 31.8 - 28.4 96.4

2009 45.7 2.2 51.7 - 28.4 128.0

2010 38.9 1.7 84.6 0.6 22.7 148.4

2011 39.7 1.0 101.2 1.0 22.7 165.5

2012 31.4 0.5 99.5 19.2 150.7

2013 21.3 0.2 58.9 21.5 101.9

2014 16.4 0.2 46.5 23.1 86.2


B U L KC A R R I E R S *


2005 295.0 25.7 318.7 11.6 200.5 851.5

2006 317.7 26.9 340.7 11.6 213.3 910.1

2007 334.7 29.0 363.7 11.2 232.5 971.2

2008 352.3 31.7 387.8 11.2 253.5 1,036.5

2009 369.0 34.0 414.7 10.4 273.1 1,101.3

2010 396.2 35.8 456.2 9.6 294.9 1,192.6

2011 413.1 36.1 533.8 6.8 309.9 1,299.8

2012 439.0 36.5 617.1 326.3 1,418.9

2013 460.5 36.6 682.5 334.1 1,513.7

2014 471.3 36.3 718.7 343.6 1,569.8

2015 478.4 36.5 750.3 366.7 1,631.8




2005 24.0 0.9 16.9 - 25.9 67.7

2006 74.7 6.8 36.7 - 25.7 143.8

2007 42.1 10.1 158.3 3.4 52.4 266.3

2008 47.4 2.7 90.4 - 20.4 160.9

2009 10.3 0.8 33.6 - 1.5 46.2

2010 38.5 1.6 82.3 - 10.8 133.2

2011 9.2 0.5 27.9 25.7 63.2

2012 14.2 0.9 17.8 11.1 44.0

2013 31.0 1.2 73.0 29.8 135.0

2014 24.1 1.0 66.9 21.2 113.2

STATISTICS


50

STATISTICS

51

4ORDER BOOK

Mill dwt




2005 72.0 11.6 60.6 - 56.2 200.4

2006 76.5 3.3 61.4 - 68.1 209.3

2007 128.7 11.0 78.9 - 80.0 298.6

2008 147.7 19.0 216.1 3.4 105.7 491.9

2009 164.0 18.4 286.3 3.4 92.2 564.3

2010 120.6 13.9 268.7 3.4 70.5 477.1

2011 113.4 9.7 246.5 2.76 53.7 426.0

2012 75.0 1.4 191.5 53.7 321.5

2013 49.4 1.6 105.4 54.6 211.0

2014 51.4 2.1 117.8 67.1 238.5

2015 63.4 3.9 146.0 63.0 276.2

5TONNAGE SOLD FOR SCRAPPING, LOST AND OTHER REMOVALSMill dwt




2005 5.3 0.3 1.2 0.0 1.0 7.8

2006 6.0 0.2 2.5 0.3 1.1 10.1

2007 11.1 0.4 0.7 0.0 2.1 14.2

2008 16.6 0.5 4.9 0.8 8.8 31.6

2009 18.4 0.5 10.2 0.9 6.7 36.7

2010 22.0 1.3 6.9 0.1 7.7 38.0

2011 13.8 0.6 23.4 6.3 44.1

2012 11.7 0.8 33.9 11.4 57.8

2013 11.6 0.5 22.8 12.0 46.8

2014 9.1 0.3 14.9 9.4 33.7

6TANKER FLEET BY SIZE

Mill dwt (incl. chemical carriers)

1 0 – 6 9 , 9 9 9 7 0 – 1 1 9 , 9 9 9 1 2 0 – 1 9 9 , 9 9 9 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 + TOTA L

2005 68.8 75.6 39.7 136.6 320.7

2006 73.4 83.5 42.9 144.6 344.5

2007 79.4 89.6 46.2 148.6 363.7

2008 85.9 97.1 48.4 152.6 383.9

2009 93.6 103.6 47.8 157.9 403.0

2010 106.5 108.5 59.4 157.6 432.0

2011 109.1 116.0 62.6 161.5 449.3

2012 112.2 121.0 68.2 174.2 475.6

2013 114.3 123.8 72.8 186.2 497.1

2014 116.9 123.7 76.5 190.5 507.6

2015 120.2 123.3 76.5 194.9 514.9

7TANKER DELIVERIES BY SIZE

Mill dwt (incl. chemical carriers)

8NEW ORDERS OF TANKERS BY SIZEMill dwt (incl. chemical carriers)

1 0 – 6 9 , 9 9 9 7 0 – 1 1 9 , 9 9 9 1 2 0 – 1 9 9 , 9 9 9 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 + TOTA L

2005 6.7 9.6 4.0 9.1 29.5

2006 8.1 7.9 4.0 5.5 25.4

2007 9.4 8.6 4.2 9.5 31.7

2008 11.2 10.3 2.2 12.4 36.1

2009 16.4 7.3 13.3 11.0 48.0

2010 8.4 9.9 5.7 16.6 40.5

2011 5.9 8.4 7.0 19.4 40.7

2012 3.4 5.8 7.4 15.4 32.0

2013 4.6 2.7 4.7 9.5 21.5

2014 5.2 2.2 1.3 7.9 16.6

1 0 – 6 9 , 9 9 9 7 0 – 1 1 9 , 9 9 9 1 2 0 – 1 9 9 , 9 9 9 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 + TOTA L

2005 7.0 5.8 1.1 11.0 24.9

2006 16.2 21.6 13.3 30.3 81.5

2007 15.4 13.5 8.3 15.0 52.2

2008 6.3 5.3 5.8 32.8 50.1

2009 1.4 0.6 3.3 5.8 11.1

2010 2.1 6.8 11.3 19.9 40.1

2011 2.7 1.9 2.8 2.2 9.6

2012 6.1 1.1 2.5 5.3 15.1

2013 10.8 7.1 0.6 13.6 32.2

2014 5.5 5.0 6.2 8.5 25.1

9NEW ORDERS OF TANKERS BY SIZE – QUARTERLYMill dwt and number of vessels (incl. chemical carriers)

1 0 – 6 9 , 9 9 9 7 0 – 1 1 9 , 9 9 9 1 2 0 – 1 9 9 , 9 9 9 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 + TOTA L

Q D W T N O D W T N O D W T N O D W T N O D W T N O

2013 1 2,6 57 1,4 12 0,2 1 3,5 11 7,6 81

2 1,7 35 2,0 18 0,5 3 0,0 0 4,2 56

3 1,9 45 1,8 16 0,0 0 2,2 7 5,9 68

4 4,7 114 1,9 17 0,0 0 7,9 25 14,5 156

2014 1 1,8 57 2,5 27 0,3 2 5,6 18 10,2 104

2 1,9 58 0,5 5 2,1 13 0,0 0 4,5 76

3 1,4 48 0,6 7 1,0 6 2,6 8 5,5 69

4 0,4 17 1,3 14 2,8 18 0,3 1 4,9 50


52

STATISTICS

53

11BULK CARRIER FLEET BY SIZEMill dwt

H A N DY S I Z EH A N DY M A X /

S U P R A M A XPA N A M A X /

K A M S A R M A XP O S T

PA N A M A X C A P E S I Z E TOTA L

2005 70.0 71.7 70.7 4.8 101.8 318.7

2006 71.2 76.9 76.9 5.5 110.6 340.7

2007 71.9 81.4 83.6 7.0 120.3 363.7

2008 73.8 86.5 88.5 8.8 130.8 387.8

2009 75.1 92.5 93.4 10.5 143.7 414.7

2010 74.7 100.9 97.4 14.2 169.5 456.2

2011 80.2 118.4 105.3 22.4 208.0 533.8

2012 84.2 135.1 117.3 34.6 242.7 613.4

2013 87.2 146.3 133.8 44.2 268.6 679.6

2014 86.6 153.9 146.6 48.3 281.0 716.0

2015 87.8 160.8 154.1 50.4 295.0 748.2

12BULK CARRIERS DELIVERIES BY SIZEMill dwt – incl. converted tonnage





2005 1.8 5.5 6.3 0.9 9.0 23.1

2006 1.6 4.9 7.2 1.4 10.3 25.5

2007 2.3 5.2 4.9 1.8 10.5 24.8

2008 3.1 7.0 5.6 1.8 14.3 31.8

2009 5.1 10.8 4.9 3.9 27.0 51.7

2010 8.4 18.1 8.3 8.4 41.5 84.6

2011 9.2 21.0 13.7 12.8 44.6 101.2

2012 10.1 19.5 20.8 10.5 38.6 99.5

2013 5.7 12.4 15.3 4.5 21.1 58.9

2014 4.7 10.6 11.2 2.3 17.7 46.5

10TANKERS SOLD FOR RECYCLING BY SIZEMill dwt (incl. chemical carriers)

1 0 – 6 9 , 9 9 9 7 0 – 1 1 9 , 9 9 9 1 2 0 – 1 9 9 , 9 9 9 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 + TOTA L

2005 1.9 1.5 0.4 0.0 3.8

2006 2.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 3.2

2007 2.6 0.7 0.2 0.0 3.5

2008 1.8 0.8 0.2 1.3 4.0

2009 3.0 1.3 1.1 2.4 7.7

2010 5.3 1.8 1.4 3.4 11.9

2011 2.4 2.6 1.0 3.0 9.0

2012 1.1 3.7 3.2 2.8 10.8

2013 2.2 2.8 1.1 4.4 10.6

2014 1.9 2.5 1.2 2.7 8.2

13NEW ORDERS OF BULK CARRIERS BY SIZEMill dwt





2005 1.8 4.2 3.0 0.9 6.9 16.9

2006 4.8 7.5 5.5 0.9 18.0 36.7

2007 10.5 27.2 18.5 21.9 80.2 158.3

2008 12.8 19.7 8.5 9.2 40.2 90.4

2009 4.0 7.8 5.0 2.2 14.6 33.6

2010 8.3 12.7 28.1 5.7 27.5 82.3

2011 3.1 5.3 8.1 1.5 9.8 27.9

2012 3.7 5.4 4.4 0.4 3.9 17.8

2013 8.6 21.1 11.4 0.7 31.3 73.0

2014 6.8 21.8 9.7 0.2 28.4 66.9

15BULK CARRIERS SOLD FOR RECYCLING BY SIZEMill dwt





2005 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.2

2006 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.7 2.5

2007 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.7

2008 1.8 0.9 0.7 0.1 1.4 4.9

2009 5.5 2.4 0.8 0.2 1.3 10.2

2010 2.9 0.6 0.4 0.2 2.9 6.9

2011 5.2 4.3 1.7 0.6 9.9 21.6

2012 7.1 8.3 4.3 0.8 12.7 33.2

2013 6.2 4.8 2.6 0.4 8.6 22.6

2014 3.5 3.7 3.7 0.1 3.8 14.7

14NEW ORDERS OF BULK CARRIERS BY SIZE – QUARTERLYMill dwt and number of vessels





Q D W T N O D W T N O D W T N O D W T N O D W T N O D W T N O

2013 1 1.1 36 2.0 35 1.0 13 0.1 1 8.9 47 13.2 132

2 2.2 63 3.1 51 3.0 37 0.4 4 7.3 37 15.9 192

3 2.1 60 7.1 117 2.6 32 0.2 2 4.5 23 16.5 234

4 3.2 92 8.8 141 4.8 59 0.0 0 10.7 54 27.4 346

2014 1 1.7 48 9.6 159 5.2 64 0.1 1 16.0 80 32.6 352

2 1.6 43 5.4 90 2.2 28 0.0 0 5.5 25 14.7 186

3 2.0 56 4.3 70 1.8 22 0.1 1 5.3 25 13.4 174

4 1.4 38 2.6 43 0.6 8 0.0 0 1.6 8 6.2 97


54

STATISTICS

55

18ORDERBOOK BY YEAR OF DELIVERY – TANKERSMill dwt (incl. chemical carriers) – 1.1.2015

19ORDERBOOK BY YEAR OF DELIVERY – BULK CARRIERSMill dwt – 1.1.2015

S I Z E TOTA L O N O R D E R D E L I V E RY S C H E D U L E

2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 +

10–69,999 18.4 9.1 7.3 1.9

70–119,999 13.5 6.2 6.0 1.4

120–199,999 9.4 2.6 4.1 2.7

200,000+ 25.9 7.1 16.2 2.5

Total 67.3 25.0 33.7 8.5


2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 +

Handysize 13.5 8.1 4.0 1.3

Handymax/Supramax 37.5 20.6 13.7 3.2

Panamax/Kamsarmax 28.0 14.9 9.4 3.8

Post Panamax 1.9 1.3 0.6 0.0

Capesize 65.0 28.0 29.8 7.2

Total 146.0 73.0 57.5 15.5

16AGE PROFILE FOR TANKERS

Mill dwt (incl. chemical carriers) – 1.1.2015

Y E A R O F B U I LT TOTA L

– 9 4 9 5 – 9 9 0 0 – 0 4 0 5 – 0 9 1 0 – 1 4

10–69,999 10.1 11.0 25.0 45.9 28.3 120.2

70–119,999 3.6 12.6 28.3 50.3 28.5 123.3

120–199,999 2.4 8.6 18.1 21.7 25.8 76.5

200,000+ 2.3 19.2 50.3 52.9 70.2 194.9

Total 18.4 51.4 121.6 170.8 152.7 514.9

17AGE PROFILE FOR BULK CARRIERSMill dwt – 1.1.2015

Y E A R O F B U I LT TOTA L

– 9 4 9 5 – 9 9 0 0 – 0 4 0 5 – 0 9 1 0 – 1 4

Handysize 17.0 9.5 6.0 14.1 41.3 87.8

Handymax/Supramax 11.5 15.7 18.6 32.2 82.9 160.8

Panamax/Kamsarmax 11.6 20.4 23.9 28.1 70.2 154.1

Post Panamax 1.6 0.9 2.7 7.4 37.9 50.4

Capesize 27.1 26.5 28.1 58.7 154.6 295.0

Total 68.8 73.0 79.2 140.5 386.8 748.2

20ORDERBOOK BY YEAR OF DELIVERY – CONTAINER SHIPS1,000 TEU’s – 1.1.2015


2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 +

Below 1,000 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.8

1,000–1,999 132.0 61.1 62.7 8.2

2,000–3,999 228.4 133.8 69.8 24.8

4,000–5,999 62.9 57.9 5.0 0.0

6,000–7,999 27.4 27.4 0.0 0.0

8,000–9,999 845.0 605.3 220.9 18.8

10,000 + 1,886.3 998.1 637.1 251.0

Total 3,182.7 1,883.7 995.4 303.6

21SECOND HAND PRICES OF 5 YEAR OLD TANKERSMill $

22SECOND HAND PRICES OF 5 YEAR OLD BULK CARRIERSMill $

M R P R O D U C T A F R A M A X S U E Z M A X V LC C

2005 39.0 56.0 71.5 106.0

2006 45.0 61.5 75.0 113.5

2007 45.0 64.0 81.0 118.0

2008 50.0 68.0 93.0 136.0

2009 38.0 53.0 71.0 102.0

2010 25.0 40.0 56.0 82.0

2011 27.0 40.0 58.0 85.0

2012 27.0 35.0 45.0 62.0

2013 24.0 28.0 44.0 60.0

2014 28.0 32.0 40.0 62.0

2015 27.0 44.0 58.0 77.0

H A N DY M A X PA N A M A X C A P E S I Z E

2005 31.0 38.0 64.0

2006 25.5 29.0 55.0

2007 40.5 45.5 80.0

2008 73.0 88.0 138.0

2009 26.5 30.0 49.0

2010 28.0 34.0 55.0

2011 31.5 37.5 52.0

2012 25.0 26.0 38.0

2013 19.0 29.0 31.0

2014 25.0 25.5 41.0

2015 21.5 20.5 38.0

56 57

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

O S LO

RS PLATOU ASAHaakon VIIs gate 10N-0161 OsloNorwayTel: +47 2311 2000Fax: +47 2311 [email protected]

RS PLATOU SHIPBROKERSTel: +47 2311 2000Fax: +47 2311 [email protected]

Sale and Purchase +47 2311 2500 [email protected] +47 2311 2000 [email protected] Cargo +47 2311 2450 [email protected] +47 2311 0000 [email protected] +47 2251 0520 [email protected] Research +47 2311 2000 [email protected]

RS PLATOU OFFSHORETel: +47 2311 2700Fax: +47 2311 [email protected]

Drilling Units +47 2311 2700 [email protected] Development +47 2311 2700 [email protected] Support Vessels +47 2311 2700 [email protected] Chartering +47 2311 2700 [email protected] Specialized vessels +47 2311 2700 [email protected] SnP and Newbuilding +47 2311 2700 [email protected] Operations +47 2311 2700 [email protected] Research +47 2311 2700 [email protected]

RS PLATOU MARKETS ASTel: +47 2201 6300Fax: +47 2201 [email protected]

RS PLATOU PROJECT FINANCE AS Tel: +47 2311 2000Fax: +47 2311 [email protected]

RS PLATOU REAL ESTATE ASTel: +47 2311 2000Fax: +47 2311 [email protected]

A B E R D E E N

THE STEWART GROUP LIMITEDCity WharfShiprowAberdeen AB11 5BYUnited KingdomTel: +44 1224 256 [email protected]

C A P E TO W N

RS PLATOU (AFRICA) LIMITED7C4 Somerset SquareHighfield Road, Green PointCape Town, 8001,South AfricaTel: +27 440 3870Fax: +27 21 418 [email protected]

D U B A I

RIGSHIPSBuilding W3, Office 512Dubai Airport Free Zone Dubai, U.A.E. P.O. Box 371014United Arab EmiratesTel: +971 4299 7885Fax: +971 4299 [email protected]

CONTACTS

56

N E W Y O R K

RS PLATOU MARKETS, INC.410 Park Avenue, 7th floor, Suite 710New York, NY 10022United StatesTel: +1 212 317 7080Fax: +1 212 207 [email protected]

P I R A E U S

RS PLATOU HELLAS LTD. 1–3 Filellinon Str.185 36 PiraeusGreeceTel: +30 210 4294 070Fax: +30 210 4294 [email protected]@platou.gr

R I O D E J A N E I R O

RS PLATOU BRASIL LTDA.Av. Rio Branco 89, Sala 1601CEP 20.040-004 CentroRio de Janeiro, BrazilTel: +55 21 3923 [email protected]

S H A N G H A I

RS PLATOU ASA SHANGHAI REPR. OFFICELippo Plaza, Unit 2212-2213222 Huai Hai Zhong RoadShanghai 200021ChinaTel: +86 21 5396 5959Fax: +86 21 5396 [email protected]@[email protected]

S I N G A P O R E

RS PLATOU (ASIA) PTE. LTD.3 Temasek Avenue#20-01 Centennial TowerSingapore 039190Tel: +65 6336 8733Fax: +65 6336 [email protected]@[email protected]@platou.com

H O U S TO N

RS PLATOU HOUSTON INC. 1221 McKinney Street Suite 3275Houston TX 77010USATel: +1 281 445 5600Fax: +1 281 445 1090Email: [email protected]

RS PLATOU USA INC.15995 N. Barkers LandingSuite 310 Houston TX 77079USATel: +1 281 260 9980Fax: +1 281 260 9981

LO N D O N

RS PLATOU ASSET MANAGEMENT 1 Knightsbridge GreenLondon SW1X 7NEUnited KingdomTel: +44 20 7052 [email protected]

STEWART GROUP LONDON 1 Tranquil Vale, BlackheathLondon SE3 0BUnited KingdomTel: +44 208 297 [email protected]

M O S C O W

RS PLATOU ASA, MOSCOWBronnaya Plaza, Bldg. 1, Floor 732, Sadova-Kudrinskaya St.Moscow 123001Tel: +7 495 787 9922Fax: +7 495 787 [email protected]


58

www.platou.com

DE

SIG

N: P

AP

ER

PL

AN

E

Platou Report

Documents

Transcript of Platou Report