Plataforma de Monetização de Dados Pós Cambridge...
Transcript of Plataforma de Monetização de Dados Pós Cambridge...
5G: CHALLENGES
CARLOS ALBERTO S .
CAMARDELLA NETWORKS TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUTION – EXECUTIVE BOARD
APIs(HTTP/JSON}
Data Network
(Internet, MPLS)
Data Network
(Local Breakout)
Network Slice
Selection Function
(NSSF)
NG-PACKET CORE – DYNAMIC NFV
VNFs are dynamically instantiated in
VMs/Containers at any Datacenter
A Digital Services Provider strutucture (automation/processes/culture) is mandatory !
CARLOS ALBERTO S. CAMARDELLA 1
INTEGRATION: NETWORK SLICING
SDN Controller
Multidomain
E2E Services
Orchestrator
DC
National
DC
Edge
NSSF
Restful / Restconf
Restconf / Yang
UE
S-NSSAI / NSSAI
Restconf / Yang
Slice/Service type (SST) +
Slice Differentiator (SD)
N1 N22
AMF
Data Center
Edge
Data Center
Edge / Regional
Data Center
Regional
Data Center
National
1ms 10ms 30ms + 50ms
50km 300km + 1500km gNodeB
10km
Hierarchical
Data Centers
Structure
SDN Controller
Optical
SDN Controller
IP MPLS
Restful / Restconf
Network Slicing + SDN + NFV + SON + Distributed DCs + E2E Orchestration: OSS/BSS ?
CARLOS ALBERTO S. CAMARDELLA 2
NR Subcarrier Spacing must be chosen according to:
Aplication, Frequency Band and Channel BW
5G NR - SCALABLE NUMEROLOGY
NR Radio Frame: 10 subframes / 1ms each
1PRB = 12 SUBCARRIERS 15kHz
1 SUBFRAME = 1 SLOT (1,000ms)
1 SUBFRAME = 2 SLOTS (0,500ms each)
1 SUBFRAME = 4 SLOTS (0,250ms each)
1 SUBFRAME = 8 SLOTS (0,125ms each)
1 SUBFRAME = 16 SLOTS (0,0625ms each)
1PRB = 12 SUBCARRIERS 30kHz
1PRB = 12 SUBCARRIERS 60kHz
1PRB = 12 SUBCARRIERS 120kHz
1PRB = 12 SUBCARRIERS 240kHz
LO
WE
R L
AT
EN
CY
H
IGH
ER
FR2 BW: 50/100/200/400MHz
FREQUENCY SELECTIVE FADING x PHASE ERRORS
15kHz
240kHz
FR1 BW: 5 - 100MHz
Spectral Efficiency vs Latency (ex. 50MHz BW)
@ 15kHz Max. DL 2,00 Gbps / Min. Latency 2,0 ms
@ 30kHz Max. DL 1,96 Gbps / Min. Latency 1,5 ms
@ 60kHz Max. DL 1,92 Gbps / Min. Latency 1,0 ms
TTI: 14 OFDM Symbals per slot
CARLOS ALBERTO S. CAMARDELLA
NEW RADIO TECHNOLOGIES
Better Spectral Efficiency / More Users
Higher Latency
More Robust
Can´t be used for BW higher than 50MHz
Ex: 15kHz
Chosing subcarrier spacing is trickery...
3
TDD INTERFERENCES
Frame Rádio TDD: 10 subframes de 1ms
cada
Operator #1 - TD-LTE
Profile 0 (2 DL : 6 UL)
>5ms latency
Operator #2 - TD-LTE
Profile 3 (6 DL : 3 UL)
>10ms latency
DL DL DL DL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL
DL DL DL DL DL DL DL DL DL DL UL UL UL UL UL UL DL DL
TD-LTE Radio Frame (15kHz subcarrier spacing): 10 subframes of 1ms each / 0,5ms per slot / 7 OFDM symbols per slot
DL DL DL DL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL UL
DL DL DL DL DL DL DL DL DL DL UL UL UL UL UL UL DL DL
+ 1,5us
Operator #3 - 5G
eMBB - Latency >1ms
5G TDD Radio Frame (15kHz subcarrier spacing): 10 subframes of 1ms each / 1ms per slot / 14 OFDM symbols per slot
Operator #4 - 5G
eMBB - Latency >1ms
Operator #6 - 5G
eMBB Slot Aggregation - Latency >>2ms
Operator #7 - 5G
eMBB Slot Aggregation - Latency >>2ms
1
1
2
2
1
1
Operator #5 - 5G
uRLLC Mini Slots – Latency >0,6ms 2
2
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Freq.
Freq.
62 TDD Profiles (!)
1
time
time
Células Adjacentes Células Adjacentes
5G Adjacent Cells
Time + Phase Sync and TDD profiles – hard work !
CARLOS ALBERTO S. CAMARDELLA 4
Phase Sync Error Budget
(No Carrier Aggregation)
+/-1500 ns (15kHz)
+/- 780 ns (30kHz)
+/- 390 ns (60kHz)
TDD Radio Drift = 130ns
+/-260 ns / +/-130ns Phase Sync Error Budget
(Carrier Aggregation or CoMP-JT/JP)
5G TDD SYNC PROBLEM
PTP
+/- 400ns (FDD LTE-A + CoMP)
+/- 630ns
+/- 1000ns +/-100ns
+/- 20ns +/- 130ns (TDD@30kHz) +/- 1350ns +/- 20ns +/- 130ns (TDD@15kHz)
+/- 240ns +/- 20ns +/- 130ns (TDD@60kHz)
PTP SLAVE
The restrictive phase sync error budget demands a very tight sync network
CARLOS ALBERTO S. CAMARDELLA 5
5G TDD SYNC SOLUTIONS
PTP PTP Client
(Second. Clock)
PTP Grandmaster (Prim. Clock)
Sync from GPS(GNSS)
Sync from BBU (CPRI/eCPRI)
GPS(GNSS)
TX
GPS receivers at every cell site ? Maybe...
CARLOS ALBERTO S. CAMARDELLA 6
CoMP: LTE-A FDD (4,5G)
4.6us = Cyclic Prefix for 15kHz = maximum budget
- 1.0us = Budget for multipath fading
- 1.0us = Budget for FDD radio drift ( ± 500 ns )
=2.6us Max. ISD (Inter-Site Distance): 780 m
CoMP or CA: LTE TDD or 5G TDD 15kHz subcarrier spacing
4.6us = Cyclic Prefix for 15kHz = maximum budget
- 1.0us = Budget for multipath fading
- 3.0us = Phase Sync Error Budget ( ± 1.5 us )
=0.6us Max. ISD (Inter-Site Distance): 180 m
CoMP or CA: 5G TDD 30kHz subcarrier spacing
2.3us = Cyclic Prefix for 30kHz = maximum budget
- 0.5us = Budget for multipath fading
- 1.5us = Phase Sync Error Budget ( ± 780 ns )
=0.3us Max. ISD (Inter-Site Distance): 90 m
260ns
CoMP JOINT TRANSMISSION & CA
CoMP
Joint Transmission Inter-Sites
130ns
260ns
260ns
CA
ISD
CARLOS ALBERTO S. CAMARDELLA
Physical limitations to the coverage of TDD cells (remember that subcarrier spacing is trickery?)
7
HIGH FREQUENCIES
5G NR RADIO FRAME LENGHT: 10ms
10 x 1ms subframes
Is mobility really feasible above 24GHz?
CARLOS ALBERTO S. CAMARDELLA 8
Field tests with new filtered LNBFs
First TVRO x TD-LTE 2x2 MIMO demo (TIM’s Guaratiba Site) – Feb/ 2018 First TVRO x 5G & TD-LTE Massive MIMO tests (Claro´s LAB - CRT) – Nov/ 2018
3.5GHz COMPATIBILITY TESTS
3.5GHz is the first
globally harmonized
band for IMT-2020(5G) Parabolic Antenna:
•Weak Signal(-150dBm)
•Filterless LNBF
Satellite:
36.000km orbit
Extended C-Band DL TVRO
Cell Site:
•Strong Signal(60dBm)
Interference
IMT vs Extended C-Band Satellite TVRO services
CARLOS ALBERTO S. CAMARDELLA 9
MOBILE(MACRO) x FWA(SMALL CELLS) FR-1 x FR-2
CARLOS ALBERTO S. CAMARDELLA
3.5GHz => FR-1
• Good outdoor coverage/improved capacity in high densiity
scenarios w/ Massive MIMO(no gain in sparse/low density scenarios)
• Worse indoor penetration than lower bands
• Excellent for mobility
• Less capacity than FR-2 bands (up to 100MHz Carrier BW)
• Interferences with extended C-Band TVRO satellite services
• TDD adjacent cells sync problems
• High users-per-cell ratio (up to 273 NRBs – 30kHz SCS@100MHz BW)
26GHz => FR-2
• Poor outdoor coverage (even with Massive MIMO)
• Poor indoor penetration (needs window placed/outdoor antennas)
• Poor mobility
• Much higher capacity than FR-1 bands (up to 400MHz Carrier BW)
• No Interferences with other radio/satellite services
• Less TDD adjacent cells sync problems than FR-1 (LOS-only coverage
+ beamforming)
• Low users-per-cell ratio (up to 264 NRBs – 120kHz SCS@400MHz BW)
10
THANK YOU !
CARLOS ALBERTO S .
CAMARDELLA DIRETORIA DE EVOLUÇÃO TECNOLÓGICA DE REDES