Surface modification and direct plasma amination of L605 ...
PLASMA SURFACE MODIFICATION OF POLYMERS USING …PLASMA SURFACE MODIFICATION OF POLYMERS USING...
Transcript of PLASMA SURFACE MODIFICATION OF POLYMERS USING …PLASMA SURFACE MODIFICATION OF POLYMERS USING...
PLASMA SURFACE MODIFICATION OF POLYMERS USING ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE DISCHARGES*
Rajesh Dorai 1 and Mark J. Kushner 2
University of Illinois
1 Department of Chemical Engineering 2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: [email protected] [email protected]
http://uigelz.ece.uiuc.edu
* Work supported by 3M and NSF (CTS99-74962)
AGENDA
• Introduction
• Plasma processes for polymer surface treatment • Description of the model
• GLOBAL_KIN • Surface site balance model for heterogeneous chemistry • Reactions in air and at the polypropylene surface
• Atmospheric pressure plasma processing of polypropylene (PP)
• Periodic steady states in radical densities • Effect of energy deposition • Effect of relative humidity • Low-Molecular Weight Oxidized Materials (LMWOM)
• Conclusions
ICOPS02-02
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
PLASMA SURFACE MODIFICATION OF POLYMERS
• Polymer materials typically require
surface activation to improve their wetting (for dyeing) and adhesion properties.
• Atmospheric pressure plasma
treatment is well suited for this purpose because of the ease of generation of gas-phase radicals which can react with and modify the polymer surface.
• The typical plasma equipment for
treatment are corona discharges. • These devices operate as dielectric
barrier discharges (DBDs) owing to dielectrics on the electrodes and the capacitance of the polymer.
ICOPS-02-03
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
POLYMER TREATMENT: LOW vs. ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE
• Low pressure processes
• Advantages
More uniform treatment compared to atmospheric pressure. Less contamination problems (a controlled gas mixture is used). Flexibility of using gases of various types.
• Disadvantages:
Equipment is expensive (vacuum). Problems in using in continuous mode.
• Atmospheric pressure processes
• Equipment is simple, cost effective. • Can be used in continuous operation.
ICOPS-02-3AA
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
COMMERCIAL CORONA PLASMA EQUIPMENT
• Commercial atmospheric pressure plasma equipments treat conducting/non-conducting materials at line speeds ~ 400 m/min.
• Suppliers include Enercon Inc., Tri-Star Technologies, Pillar Technologies,
Sherman Treaters.
ENERCON’s PLASMATREAT3 TM
SHERMAN TREATER’s PBS/12Cx1
ICOPS-02-03A
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
THE PLASMA SURFACE MODIFICATION PROCESS
HIGH-VOLTAGEPOWER SUPPLY
FEED ROLL
PROCESSEDPOLYMER FILM
GROUNDEDELECTRODE
COLLECTORROLL
PLASMA
~
SHOEELECTRODE
POWERED
TYPICAL PROCESS CONDITIONS:
Web speed: 10 - 200 m/minResidence time: a few sEnergy deposition: 0.1 - 1.0 J cm-2Applied voltage: 10-20 kV at a few 10s kHzGas gap ~ a few mm
ICOPS-02-04
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
THE OVERALL PROCESS
ICOPS-02-04AA
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
C C C C C C C C C
C C C C C C C C C C
OH
OHO||
OH, O
C C C C C C C C C C C
LAYER 1
LAYER 2
LAYER 3
H
OH, H2O
OH
OHO2
O2
HUMID-AIR PLASMA
BOUNDARY LAYER
POLYPROPYLENE
H2O
e e
H OH
N2
e e
N NO2
O O
e e
O2O3
O2NO
NO
POLYMERS MODIFIED USING PLASMAS
• Plasma surface modification is used on:
• Polyethylene • Polypropylene • Poly (ethylene terephthalate) • Polystyrene
• The extent of modification depends on factors relating to the polymer
structure:
• Unsaturation in the backbone (presence of multiply bonded carbon chains)
• Functional groups attached to the backbone • Orientation of the attached groups with respect to the backbone • Crystalline/amorphous nature of the polymer
• In this study, we address polypropylene (PP).
• Apparel (Active wear or sportswear) • Home furnishings (indoor and outdoor carpets, upholstery) • Packaging
ICOPS-02-04A
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
POLYPROPYLENE (PP) - STRUCTURE
• Polypropylene polymer:
C C C C C CH H H H H H
H H HCH3 CH3CH31
2 31 - Primary C2 - Secondary C3 - Tertiary C
• Three types of carbon atoms in a PP chain:
• Primary C – attached to only one another carbon; • Secondary C – attached to two carbon atoms; and • Tertiary C – attached to three carbon atoms.
• The reactivity of an H-atom depends on the type of C bonding. • Reactivity scales as: HT > HS > HP (HT=tertiary H; HS=secondary H;
HP=primary H).
ICOPS-02-05
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
FUNCTIONALIZATION OF THE PP SURFACE
• Untreated PP is a saturated hydrocarbon chain which is hydrophobic
(repels water). • The increase in surface energy of PP after corona treatment is attributed to
the functionalization of the polymer surface with hydrophilic groups (attracts water).
• An air-corona-processed PP film contains hydrophilic functional groups
such as: • Aldehydes (-CHO) • Ketones (-C=O) • Alcohols (-C-OH) • Hydroperoxides (-COOH)
• The hydroperoxides photolytically degrade to produce alkoxy radicals (-C-
O) and OH. • Energy deposition and relative humidity (RH) of air plasmas significantly
affect this functionalization.
ICOPS-02-06
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
LOW-MOLECULAR WEIGHT OXIDIZED MATERIALS (LMWOM)
• Corona-treatment also produces cross-linking and degradation. • Smaller chain-length oxidized compounds soluble in polar solvents (e.g.,
H2O, ethanol) are formed. These are called LMWOM. • The role of LMWOM in improving ink adhesion is not well understood. • Strobel et al. suggest that LMWOM may be beneficial to the adhesion of
polyamide inks on corona-treated PP. 1 • Briggs et al. observed poor ink adhesion (nitrocellulose-based ink) in the
presence of LMWOM and attributed it to the weak bonding of the LMWOM to the polymer. 2
1 Strobel et al. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 3, 321 (1989). 2 Briggs et al. Polymer 24, 47 (1983).
ICOPS-02-06A
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
GOALS OF THIS INVESTIGATION
• Oxidized functional groups incorporated onto the surface are responsible
for increased adhesion. • The reaction mechanism and processes leading to the formation of
LMWOM are still not well understood. • Based on experimental data (O/C ratios on surfaces, surface densities of
functional groups), reaction mechanisms are constructed for heterogeneous chemistry at the PP surface.
• With the help of a global kinetics model validated against experiments,
parameterizations are performed over energy depositions and relative humidities to study their effect on surface properties.
ICOPS-02-06B
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL – GLOBAL_KIN
Modules in GLOBAL_KIN: • Homogeneous plasma chemistry • Transport to surface through a boundary layer • Heterogeneous surface chemistry • Circuit model
N(t+∆t),V,I
CIRCUITMODULE
GAS-PHASEKINETICS
SURFACEKINETICS
VODE -ODE SOLVER
OFFLINEBOLTZMANN
SOLVER
LOOKUP TABLEOF k vs. Te
ICOPS-02-07
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
HUMID-AIR REACTION MECHANISM
ICOPS-02-7A
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
• Gas-phase products of humid-air corona treatment include O3, NO, NO2, HNO2, HNO3.
N2
O2
H2O
N N2(A)
e
e O
H OH
e
O2
NO
O2,OH
HNO2OH
NO2O3, HO2
OHNO3
OHN2
N
O3 HO2OH
OH
O2
O2(1∆)
HO2
O2
SPECIES TRANSPORT TO THE POLYMER SURFACE
• Bulk plasma species diffuse to the PP surface through a boundary layer (d~ a few λmfp; λmfp~µm at 1 atm).
• Flux of the radicals reaching the surface is,
4th=φ vn , n = density, vth = thermal speed.
• Radicals react on the PP based on a user-defined mechanism.
POLYPROPYLENE
BOUNDARYLAYER ~ λmfp
BULK PLASMA
DIFFUSION REGIME
O OH CO2
d
ICOPS-02-08
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
HETEROGENEOUS PROCESSES AT THE PP SURFACE
• Radicals at the polymer surface react with the surface by addition or abstraction.
• After surface reactions, desorbed products diffuse through the boundary
layer into the bulk plasma. • Inter-surface-species reactions are also included.
C C C C C C C C C LAYER 1
C C C C C C C C C C LAYER 2
OH
OHO||
O, OH
C C C C C C C C C C C LAYER 3
H
OH, H2O
OH
OHO2
O2
ICOPS-02-09
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
SURFACE SITE BALANCE MODEL
• The total number of sites allowed for reaction is variable. • When a “hole” is made in the PP chain, radicals are allowed to diffuse
through it to the layers beneath and react.
C C C C C C C C C LAYER 1
C C C C C C C C C C LAYER 2
C C C C C C C C C C C LAYER 3
AVAILABLE FORCARBON SITES
REACTION
ICOPS-02-10
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
REACTIONS AT PP SURFACE
• O and OH abstract H from the PP chain to produce alkyl radicals. • Further reaction of O atoms with alkyl radicals produce alkoxy radicals
which undergo scission reactions to form aldehydes and ketones.
(ALKOXY RADICAL)
O
~CH2 C CH2~
CH3
O
~CH2 C CH2~ + CH3
CH2~O
~CH2 CCH3
+
a
b
~CH2 C CH2~
CH3
~CH2 C CH2~
CH3
HO, OH
OH, H2O
(ALKYL RADICAL)(POLYPROPYLENE)
O
(ALKOXY RADICAL)
O2
O
~CH2 C CH2~
CH3
~CH2 C CH2~
CH3
OO
(PEROXY RADICAL)
NO2NO
ICOPS-02-13
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
BASE CASE: ne, Te
• As the voltage across the gap increases, electrons gain energy and by ionizing the background gases, produce an electron avalanche,
e + N2 → N2
+ + e + e, e + O2 → O2+ + e + e, e + H2O → H2O+ + e + e.
• Once the gap-voltage decreases below sustaining, electrons decay by
attachment (primarily to O2).
109
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
n e (c
m-3
)
10-10 10-9 10-8 10-710-11Time (s)
1st of 921
51, 102, ... , 921
51, 102, ... , 921
1st of 921T e (e
V)
0
21
345678
10-10 10-9 10-810-1110-12Time (s)
• N2/O2/H2O=79/20/1, 300 K, 1 atm, 10 kV at 9.6 kHz. • Web speed=250 cm/s, gas gap=2.5 mm.
ICOPS-02-11
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
GAS-PHASE RADICALS: O, OH, N
• Electron impact dissociation of O2, H2O and N2 produces O, OH and N,
e + N2 → N + N + e, e + O2 → O + O + e, e + H2O → H + OH + e. • O consumption in the gas-
phase occurs primarily by ozone (O3) formation,
O + O2 + M → O3 + M. • Although large densities of N
atoms are produced, they are 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
OH
, O, N
(101
4 cm
-3)
Time (s)10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5
N
O
OH
1st O N, OH
51
921
51
921
921
51
relatively unreactive with PP compared to O and OH. • After 100s of discharge pulses, the radicals attain a periodic steady state.
ICOPS-02-12
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
GAS HEATING
• Typical energy deposition for PP treatment is a few J cm-2
= a few 10s of J cm-3 (few mms gas gap). • Back-of-the-envelope calculation
N CP ∆TGAS = Energy deposition At atmospheric pressure, N ≈ 3×1019 cm-3, CP, AIR ≈ 4×10-23 J molecule-1 K-1.
∴ for edep=1 J cm-3,
FEED FILM
PROCESSEDPOLYMER FILM
GROUNDEDELECTRODE
PLASMA
SHOEELECTRODE
POWERED
AIRFLOW500 cm s-1
K∆TGAS 1000
1041031
2319 ≈×⋅×
= − !
• In experiments, this heating is avoided by cooling the electrodes using air. • An overall heat transfer coefficient has been incorporated into the model
for this purpose.
ICOPS-02-12A
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
REACTION PROBABILITIES ON PP
• Probabilities for surface reactions on PP were estimated based on rate constants for similar gas-phase reactions with long-chain saturated hydrocarbons.
• A gas-kinetic rate constant (~ 10-10 cm3 s-1) ≈ unit reaction probability at PP. • Results from the model are then compared with experiments (for example,
O/C ratios). • To “better” the agreement between model and experiments, probabilities
for key reaction pathways are adjusted. • For example, most of the O impregnated on the PP surface was by,
NO + PP-O2 → NO2 + PP-O (alkoxy radical)
• For a reaction probability of 0.02, “agreement” was observed between
model and experiments (of O/C ratios on PP).
ICOPS-02-13A
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
MODEL VALIDATION: O/C RATIOS ON PP, LMWOM
• O/C ratios on PP as a function of energy deposition were compared to experiments*.
• Most of the O on the surface came from aldehydes and ketones (LMWOM).
At larger energy depositions (> 1 J cm-2), the aldehydes are converted to CO2.
ENERGY DEPOSITION (J cm-2)
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
O/C
(%)
MODEL
EXPERIMENT
ENERGY DEPOSITION (J cm-2)
DEN
SITY
(101
4 cm
-2)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
ALDEHYDES
KETONES
Air at 300 K, 1 atm, 55% RH
* Zenkiewicz, M., J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 15 63 (2001).
ICOPS-02-14
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
GAS-PHASE PRODUCTS: O3, H2O2
• O3 is produced by the reaction of O with O2,
O + O2 + M → O3 + M. • At higher energy depositions,
more O is produced resulting in increased O3 formation.
ENERGY DEPOSITION (J cm-2)
O3
(101
7 cm
-3)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
• H2O2 is produced by,
H + O2 + M → HO2 + M, HO2 + HO2 + M → H2O2 + O2 + M.
• At high energy depositions (lower
film speeds), H2O2 density decreases due to decrease in <HO2>.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
H2O
2 (1
015
cm-3
)
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
<HO
2> (1
014
cm-3
)
<HO2>
H2O2
ENERGY DEPOSITION (J cm-2)
ICOPS-02-15
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
GAS-PHASE PRODUCTS: NO, NO2
• NO and NO2 (combinedly called NOx) are produced by, N2 + O → NO + N, NO + O + M → NO2 + M. • NO is also converted to NO2 by
reaction with peroxy radicals at the PP surface,
NO + R-OO → NO2 + R-O. • At higher energy depositions, most of
the NOX is converted to N2O, N2O5, HNOX,
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0ENERGY DEPOSITION (J cm-2)
NO
NO2
Den
sity
(101
3 cm
-3)
NO2 + N → N2O + O, NO2 + NO3 + M → N2O5 + M, NO + OH + M → HNO2 + M, NO2 + OH + M →HNO3 + M.
ICOPS-02-15A
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
GAS-PHASE PRODUCTS: N2O, N2O5
• Nitrous oxide (N2O) and di-nitrogen pentoxide (N2O5) are gases of interest from an environmental perspective.
• Increasing amounts of these are generated at higher energy depositions. • N2O is generated by the reaction
of NO2 with N, NO2 + N → N2O + O. • N2O5 is formed by the reaction of
NO2 with NO3, O + NO2 + M → NO3 + M, NO2 + NO3 + M → N2O5 + M.
ENERGY DEPOSITION (J cm-2)
0
5
10
15
20
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0D
ENSI
TY (1
015
cm-3
)
N2O
N2O5
ICOPS-02-16
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
ETCH PRODUCTS AND RATES
ICOPS-02-17
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
• The primary etch product is CO2,
~CH2 C C=O
CH3
H H
+ O ~CH2 C C=O
CH3
H
OH + ~CH2 C
CH3
H
+ CO2+ O
• Higher energy depositions result in increased flux of O and OH to the PP
surface which increases the etch rate.
ENERGY DEPOSITION (J cm-2)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
CO
2 (1
014
cm-3
)
ENERGY DEPOSITION (J cm-2)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
ETC
HR
ATE
(mon
olay
ers/
min
)
EFFECT OF RH: O/C RATIO ON PP
• At higher RH, more fraction of input energy is channeled into OH production and hence <OH> increases and <O> decreases.
• With higher <OH>, more alkyl radicals (through OH abstraction) are
produced which leads to increased O impregnation on the PP surface.
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1 10 100RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
<O>
<OH>
Den
sity
(101
4 cm
-3)
0
5
10
15
20
1 10 100RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
O/C
RAT
IO O
N P
P (%
)
(Energy deposition = 0.34 J cm-2)
ICOPS-02-18
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
EFFECT OF RH: O3, H2O2
• Higher RHs result in decreasing <O> and as a result O3 production decreases.
• Larger amount of HO2 is produced at higher RH and this leads to increased
H2O2 production,
HO2 + HO2 + M → H2O2 + O2 + M.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
O3
(101
7 cm
-3)
1 10 100RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
H2O
2 (1
015
cm-3
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 10 100RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
<HO2>
H2O2
<HO
2> (1
014
cm-3
)
ICOPS-02-19
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
EFFECT OF RH: NXOY
• NO and NO2 densities increase with RH because of the increased rate of the reactions,
N + OH → NO + H, NO + HO2 → NO2 + OH.
• Larger NO2 leads to increased formation of N2O and N2O5,
NO2 + N → N2O + O, NO2 + NO3 + M → N2O5 + M.
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1 10 100RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
NO
Den
sity
(101
4 cm
-3) NO2
1013
1014
1015
1016
1 10 100RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
N2O
N2O5
Den
sity
(cm
-3)
ICOPS-02-20
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
EFFECT OF RH: HNO2, HNO3, CO2
ICOPS-02-21
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics
• Increasing RH leads to increased HNOX byproduct formation,
NO + OH + M → HNO2 + M, NO2 + OH + M → HNO3 + M.
• Due to the increased rate of abstraction by OH at higher RH, the etch rate increases.
OH + PP-H → PP• + H2O, PP• + …. → aldehydes, ….+ O → CO2 + ….
1013
1014
1015
1016
1 10 100RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
Den
sity
(cm
-3)
HNO3
HNO2
0
1
2
3
4
1 10 100RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
CO
2 (1
013
cm-3
)
SUMMARY
• A global kinetics model has been used to study the gas-phase and surface
chemistries during the air-corona discharge treatment of PP. • O/C ratio on PP increased with increasing energy deposition and relative
humidity. • Continued increase in energy deposition however lead to PP
decomposition (to CO2). • Gas-phase products produced in significant amounts (>1015 cm-3) include
O3, H2O2, HNO3, N2O, N2O5. • Although increased energy deposition results in more hydrophilic
surfaces, the production of environmentally sensitive gases could be an issue.
ICOPS-02-22
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics