Plant Protecting Agents In Hops - Eurofins Scientific Protecting Agents In Hops Research, Analytics...
Transcript of Plant Protecting Agents In Hops - Eurofins Scientific Protecting Agents In Hops Research, Analytics...
Plant Protecting Agents In Hops
Research, Analytics and Certainty
Research
Research and method development for hops matrixes was already done at Eurofins in 2009. The methods were validated and implementated the following year.
Analytics
Our method is based on the official multimethod DFG S19(1) and Klein & Adler(2). Using an additional clean up in adsorption phases, substances which interfere in the analysis such as hops resin are separated.
1. Homogenized samples + internal standards
2. Extraction + clean up in SPE phases
3. concentrated eluate measurement
Using extract clean ups (pic. 1) it is possible to meet the maximum residue requirements according to Regulation (EG) Nr. 396/2005 with low limits of quantification.
Using a method especially developed for hops, 564 pesticides in cone hops, pellets (P90/P45) and extracts (CO2/Ethanol) are tested in one screening. The screening goes beyond the spectrum of allowed active agents and recognizes cross-contamination through drift from neighboring cultures (e.g. fruit).
Along with the hops pesticide screening we also offer our clients a growing portfolio of individual analyses. At this time we are mainly concentrating on testing for flumioxazine, chlorates, bromoxynil, milbemectin, glyphosate, deiquat, paraquat, sulphur, MCPA, clopyralid, prothioconazole, dithianon, copper and fosetyl-al.
Picture1: extract-clean up
GC/MS & GC/HR-MS (TOF) LC/MS/MS
raw extract
GC measurement vial
raw extract
LC measurement vial
Eurofins Food & Feed Testing [email protected] – www.eurofins.de
Hopfen CO2 Extrakt z-Score
Pestizide\Jahr 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Azoxystrobin 0,41 0,43 0,74 0,93 0,35
Bifenthrin - - - - -0,83
Boscalid 0,62 0,42 1,25 1,28 -0,57
Captan - -1,10 0,23 0,58 -0,60
Dimethomorph 0,08 0,36 1,07 0,66 -0,92
Fenpyroximat - - - - 0,43
Flonicamid 0,29 -0,20 0,43 0,91 -0,81
TFNA - - - - -0,80
TFNG - - - - -0,80
Fluopicolide 0,36 -0,09 1,36 0,33 0,00
Folpet -0,10 0,60 0,61 0,75 0,66
Hexythiazox - - - - -0,82
Imidacloprid - - - - -0,82
lambda Cyhalothrin - - - -0,78 -0,59
Mandipropamid - - 1,03 1,91 -0,80
Metalaxyl 0,00 0,88 0,69 0,11 -0,47
Myclobutanil 0,28 0,28 0,89 1,07 -0,85
Pyraclostrobin 0,28 0,61 0,81 -1,14 -0,70
Quinoxyfen 0,50 0,18 0,85 0,61 -0,68
Spirodiclofen 0,44 -0,17 0,72 1,19 -0,81
Triadimenol 0,68 0,25 0,92 -0,07 -0,68
Trifloxystrobin 0,11 0,70 0,71 0,11 -0,76
Table 1: z-Score of the ring analyzes from 2011 to 2015
The information included in this publication is based on our current knowledge and was thoroughly verified. Nevertheless there is no guarantee for it to be up-to-date,complete and correct. Eurofins is not to be held liable for damages or injury, which are connected to the use of this information. Especially the confirmation of legaldetails is up to the user. All offers are non-binding and without obligation.
16G
TZ
W11
Certainty
The precision and repeatability of the methods is regularly demonstrated by laboratory ring tests.
Table 1 shows the distribution of Eurofins z-scores in the ring tests of the Hops Analysis Working Group (Arbeitskreis Hopfenanalytik - AHA). This qualification, as well as the ca. 1.500
hops screenings done yearly, show that Eurofins is highly competent in residue analysis.
Literature:
[1] Official collection of testing procedures according
to §64 LFGB L00.00-34
[2] Official collection of testing procedures according
to §64 LFGB L00.00-113