Plant ecological solutions to global food security file · Web viewEcosystem Services, Ecological...
Transcript of Plant ecological solutions to global food security file · Web viewEcosystem Services, Ecological...
Plant ecological solutions to global food security
Richard D Bardgett1* and David J. Gibson2
1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford
Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
2Department of Plant Biology, Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901-6509, USA
Summary
1. As global climate changes and the world population increases, agriculture
faces an enormous challenge to increase food production in an equitable and
sustainable manner. Principles and concepts derived directly from plant
ecological research can help meet this challenge.
2. This series of 10 mini-reviews considers some of the key ways that plant
ecologists can help inform and contribute to meeting this challenge.
3. The papers are grouped into three main themes of plant ecology, namely plant
community diversity and structure, plant population dynamics and plant
interactions, and plant-soil (belowground) interactions.
4. Synthesis: We identify a number of important knowledge gaps in areas where
plant ecological research can contribute towards improving yield, nutrition,
ecosystem services, and environmental resilience of agricultural systems.
However, the adoption of plant ecological principles in sustainable agriculture
will require practical approaches to their implementation along with improved
understanding of social and economic barriers.
Key-words: Ecosystem Services, Ecological Resilience, Food security, Sustainable
Agriculture, Plant-soil interactions, Plant community dynamics, Plant-plant
interactions
1
Introduction
Globally, agriculture is facing many challenges. Of paramount importance is the need
to increase food production to feed a burgeoning world population and to do this in a
sustainable way, reducing harmful effects of intensive agriculture on the environment.
But there is also a need for agriculture and the food industry to keep pace with shifts
in food consumption and to improve distribution and access to food. This challenge
also needs to done at a time of rapid environmental change, with rising temperatures
and extreme climate events threatening food production and placing considerable
pressures on the capacity of land to support crops and livestock. Further, the global
expansion and intensification of agriculture poses a significant threat to the
environment, causing habitat and biodiversity loss, water pollution, and increased
greenhouse gas emissions (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005); and, in many
parts of the world, it is responsible for extensive degradation of soils, which
represents a major threat to both local and global food supplies (FAO 2015).
Together, these factors create a daunting challenge, which requires tackling various
constraints on crop production, but also many political and societal challenges to
ensure food supplies are safeguarded in an equitable and sustainable way, minimizing
harmful impacts on the environment (Foley et al. 2011).
Many solutions have been proposed to tackle this challenge, such as halting
agricultural expansion, shifting diets, increasing resource use efficiency of crops and
farm systems, closing yield gaps by harnessing the potential of underperforming
crops, and the production of food via sustainable intensification strategies (Foley et al.
2011; Godfray et al. 2010). Further, there are many social and political challenges that
need to be tackled in order to develop and implement sustainable food production
strategies, especially in developing countries where policies must include small
holders and less favoured groups (Austin et al. 2013). But how can plant ecology
contribute to this grand challenge? This challenge is what this Special Feature is
about: exploring promising and imaginative ways that the science of plant ecology
can contribute to the challenge of increasing food production in a sustainable way.
Plant ecological research in the Journal of Ecology has traditionally had, and
continues to have, a strong focus on fundamental research, often in more natural
settings. But this Special Feature recognizes that many of the dominant themes of the
Journal, such as plant community and population dynamics, plant-soil (belowground)
interactions, plant-plant, and plant-climate interactions, are of high relevance to
2
modern agriculture. Further, as noted by Weiner (2017), this understanding in plant
ecology has now advanced to a level where we have much of the knowledge
necessary to build highly sustainable and resilient food production systems.
We have assembled a range of mini-reviews, which consider a variety of ways
that plant ecological knowledge could be used to inform agriculture and contribute to
the challenge of increasing food production in a sustainable way in both arable and
pastoral systems, and across different spatial scales. The papers cover a range of
perspectives on the application of fundamental ecological knowledge to sustainable
food production in crop and pastoral systems, including recent advances in
understanding of plant resource capture, plant-plant interactions, biodiversity-function
relationships, ecological resilience, plant defence, plant-soil (belowground)
interactions, and weed ecology. Here we provide a brief introduction to the Special
Feature. We first identify the dominant themes that are covered in the Special Feature
and then consider some of the challenges that we face in ensuring that such plant
ecological knowledge is effectively used to increase food production in a sustainable
way. We recognise that challenge of food security does not just concern food
production, in that it requires consideration of all aspects of the food system from
production to consumption (Erickson et al. 2008); But our focus here is mainly on
how plant ecological knowledge can contribute to this challenge, albeit in the context
of some of these wider challenges.
Plant community diversity and structure
The study of biodiversity-function relationships has long been a dominant theme of
plant ecology and the Journal of Ecology (Hutchings et al. 2012). Although a much
debated topic, there is a general consensus that biodiversity loss reduces most
ecosystem functions, and ecosystem multifunctionality, and impairs their stability
over time, and that functional traits of species have a major role in determining
diversity effects (Hector & Bagchi 2007; Cardinale et al. 2012). Most agro-
ecosystems, however, are monocultures receiving high inputs of agrochemicals, or
intensively managed, species-poor grasslands, and most agricultural lands have been
subject to considerable diversity loss (Newbold et al. 2015). As highlighted by Isbell
et al. (2017), attitudes are changing, and there is now growing interest in not just
preventing further biodiversity loss in agro-ecosystems, but also in their
diversification via increasing crop genetic diversity, mixed plantings, rotating crops,
3
and diversifying field margins and surrounding landscapes. Further, as shown by
Isbell et al. (2017), strategically increasing plant diversity in agro-ecosystems has
multiple potential benefits, including increases in crop and forage yield, wood
production, yield stability, pollinators, weed and pest suppression, and soil health.
However, there are also many challenges in implementing diversification strategies,
such as the need for new harvesting equipment and to identify and maintain optimal
species mixtures to maximize yield and ecosystem services. But they argue that
overcoming these challenges is worthwhile and offer suggestions on how best to
implement appropriate diversification strategies.
Another topic that is receiving much attention is ecological resilience in the
context of global change (Oliver et al. 2015; Reyer et al., 2015). Recent studies
suggest that, in general, high plant diversity can stabilize ecosystem productivity and
services through increasing resistance to climate events (Isbell et al. 2015).
Agriculture in many parts of the world is threatened by more frequent extreme climate
events, such as heat waves, floods, and droughts, and diversification of agro-
ecosystems could help to enhance the resilience of food production systems to such
environmental perturbations. This issue is examined by Bullock et al. (2017), who
extend the ecological concept of resilience to agro-ecosystems in the context of
maintaining production of sufficient and nutritious food in the face of environmental
perturbations. They argue that resilience in agro-ecosystems manifests itself across
multiple spatial scales: at the field scale, for example, the use of mixtures of crop
varieties and forage species can enhance resilience; at the farm scale, resilience can be
increased by diversifying crops and livestock, and being flexible in the choice of crop
varieties in response to changing conditions; whereas at regional to global scales,
coordinated implementation of adaptive strategies across farms, along with
knowledge exchange to and among farmers, is required to create more resilient food
systems. Given this, they argue that achieving resilient food production systems
requires the merging of ecological and sociological approaches across multiple scales,
from the farm to the global scale.
Weiner (2017) also stresses the importance of biodiversity for sustainable crop
production, but in the context of crop rotations, which he argues is analogous to the
ecological concept of succession. As stressed by Weiner (2017), the choice of a crop,
or crops, within a rotation is one of the most important decisions a farmer can make:
the benefits of crop diversity in rotations for disease control, soil fertility, and crop
4
yields, can be enormous, and are well documented in agriculture literature. But he
goes further, arguing that nothing demonstrates more the huge gap between
sustainability and modern agriculture than the restricted use of rotations, in terms of
both their length and the variety of crops used. The continuous cultivation of crops,
such as maize and wheat, requires enormous quantities of chemical inputs and, in the
longer term, can lead to significant soil degradation, which represents a major global
threat to food production. This degradation, coupled with the multiple potential
benefits of increasing the crop diversity across multiple scales (Bullock et al. 2017;
Isbell et al. 2017), adds support to the argument that diversification of cropping
system should be one of the highest priorities to increase agricultural sustainability
(Weiner 2017).
Plant population dynamics and plant interactions
Plant population ecology, including various forms of plant-organism interactions,
continues to be a key strength of Journal of Ecology. Included in this Special Feature
are four papers that emphasize in different ways how fundamental plant population
ecological research can inform agriculture. The issue of competition between crops
and ‘weeds’, and intraspecific interactions among crops, arose from agricultural work
over fifty years ago (de Wit 1960) and was brought into the realm of plant ecology by
John Harper and others (Harper 1976), which allowed many of the basic principles to
be worked out (Keddy 2015) and fed back into agricultural research (Tow and
Lazenby 2001; Zimdahl, 2004). The papers in this Special Feature touch on three
related topics: competition, phenological shifts in response to climate change, and
pollination services. Murphy et al. (2017) address kin selection and altruism in crops,
a topic first proposed as an Evolutionary Stable Strategy (ESS) among competing
soybeans (Glycine max) in Journal of Ecology (Gersani et al., 2001), although
regarded initially as controversial (e.g., Hess & De Kroon 2007; Semchenko et al.
2007). In their paper, Murphy et al. (2017) argue that reduced intraspecific
competition among crop plants, and hence higher stand yield, can be achieved through
artificial breeding programs that select for altruism, favouring cooperation among kin.
An analogous argument is proposed by Weiner (2017) who suggests that breeding
programs should not mimic natural selection but instead focus on increasing crop
yield at the expense of individual fitness. In a different proposal also based on the
5
topic of competition, Gibson et al. (2017) review crop-weed competition and argue
that enhancements in crop quality (e.g., higher grain protein) as opposed to crop yield,
can be brought about through better understanding and manipulation of weed
taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional trait diversity. Enhancement of food quality
through precision weed diversity control with less reliance on ‘clean fields’ would go
some way towards addressing global food quality concerns and sustainability.
Whatever advances can be made in food production through traditional
agricultural breeding programs, they have to be set in the reality of ongoing climate
change. Ecological research has a long history of teasing out the relevance of genetic
diversity of natural plant populations (Turesson 1930). On this theme, and using
phenology of wine grape cultivars as an example, Wolkovich et al., (2017) argue that
agricultural research on crops needs to follow ecological research on native plants to
document phenological diversity to help anticipate and meet the current climate
challenge. As the timing of climatic events changes (i.e., seasonality), only crops with
broad levels of phenological diversity will have a sufficiently wide gene pool to allow
selection to retain viable and sustainable crop populations.
Finally, an ecosystem service that scales up directly from plant-insect
interactions and is increasingly recognized as being important is that of pollination
services. In agricultural systems, insect pollinated crops rely heavily on non-native
honey bees (Apis mellifera), which are declining due to pest, pathogens, and
pesticides (Becher et al. 2013). Burke et al. (2017) discuss how ecological concepts
can be used to develop management practices to enhance pollinator services that will
in turn benefit both sustainable food production and wild-pollinator communities.
Encouraging the creation of native, wild pollinator communities will put less reliance
on the use non-native honey bees. Both Burke et al., (2017) and Gibson et al., (2017)
advocate management of agroecosystems based upon the application of community
assembly theory paying particular attention to metrics of functional trait diversity.
Plant-soil (belowground) interactions
Another dominant theme of plant ecology is plant-soil interactions and their
contribution to soil functioning and plant population and community dynamics. This
theme is also a focus in this Special Feature, with papers considering the importance
of plant-soil interactions for maintaining or enhancing soil fertility, and crop health
and agricultural sustainability. Soils in many parts of the world have been degraded
6
by decades of continuous cultivation, overgrazing, excessive irrigation, and over
reliance on agrochemicals (FAO 2015). This degradation has led to increasing calls to
halt soil degradation, but also to devise sustainable ways of managing soils in order to
use resources, such as nutrients and water, more efficiently and reduce reliance on
fertilisers and agrochemicals.
As highlighted by Weiner (2017), soil organic matter is of central importance
to soil fertility; as such, a key feature of sustainable agricultural systems should be
high input of organic matter to soil as plant residues and animal wastes. However, the
functioning of soils is also strongly influenced by interactions between live plants,
their roots, and highly complex soil food webs. These rhizosphere interactions not
only regulate nutrient transformations and nutrient availability to plants, but also they
play a key role in plant defense, for instance via the recruitment and activation of
beneficial microorganisms that induce resistance or produce compounds that suppress
pathogens (Berendsen et al. 2012; Bardgett & van der Putten 2014). Further, these
rhizosphere interactions can promote other properties key to soil health, such as
carbon sequestration and stable aggregate formation, which improves the structure
and erosion resistance of soil (Rillig & Mummey 2006; Gould et al. 2016).
The diversity of organisms associated with plant roots is enormous, and, as
argued by De Vries & Wallenstein (2017), ecological interactions between plant roots
and microbial and faunal networks are critical determinants of soil function and plant
health. But they go a step further. Drawing on recent advances in understanding of
ecological networks, and growing evidence that plants can actually shape their
rhizosphere communities, they propose the ‘Rhizosphere Interactions for Sustainable
Agriculture’ (RISA) Model, in which crop roots recruit small, modular, highly
connected soil rhizosphere networks from large, static, relatively unconnected and
diverse bulk soil networks. Given that intensive agricultural practices typically disrupt
these belowground networks, they argue that a key feature of sustainable agricultural
systems should be to optimize connections between roots and rhizosphere food web
networks, and between rhizosphere and bulk soil networks. They propose avenues for
future research to achieve this and discuss how knowledge of belowground
connections can be applied in agricultural systems to sustainably produce food.
Perhaps the most intensively studied belowground interactions are symbiotic
associations between plants and soil microorganisms, which can stimulate plant
productivity by supplying growth-limiting nutrients to plants. The beneficial effects of
7
nitrogen-fixing bacteria, which convert atmospheric nitrogen into ammonium
nitrogen, for crop yields are well documented, as is their ecological significance in
natural ecosystems (van der Heijden et al. 2008). But another important group of
symbionts that offer potential as a component of sustainable food production systems
are mycorrhizal fungi. In this Special Feature, Thirkell et al. (2017) explore how
ecological knowledge of arbuscular mycorrhzal fungi (AMF), which form symbiosis
with many agricultural crops, can inform on their role in agro-ecosystems. They
explore the direct beneficial effects of AMF symbiosis on crop performance and
yield, via improved nutrient uptake and diversification of nutrient sources acquired by
plants, and through non-nutritional effects, such as enhanced host tolerance to pests
and diseases, and competitiveness against weeds. They also highlight that the benefits
of AMF extend to the wider soil environment, in that extraradical hyphae serve to
bind soil particles together, thereby enhancing soil structure and resistance to erosion
(Rillig & Mummey 2006). High abundance of AMF has been linked to greater water-
holding capacity and the retention of nutrients in soil following rainfall events
(Bender et al. 2016). Importantly, however, they also stress that AMF colonization
can result in yield-reducing trade-offs, for instance through increased attractiveness
and nutritive quality of plants to herbivores, thereby improving herbivore
performance (Hartley & Gange, 2009; Koricheva et al., 2009). As such, they argue
that balancing these trade-offs should be a key component of any agricultural
management strategy involving AMF. Further, given that agricultural management, as
well as climate change, can cause significant shifts in the functioning of AMF, they
argue that to realize the benefits of AMF requires future research on AMF to be
carried out in real systems at the field, farm, and landscape scale.
Challenges and ways forward
As ecologists move forward to address questions fundamental to our discipline
(Sutherland et al. 2013), we are also poised to contribute and help solve applied,
societal issues. The papers in this Special Feature demonstrate that plant ecology in
particular can contribute in many ways to the challenge of increasing food production
in a sustainable manner (Fig. 1). But, as identified in all the papers, many hurdles and
constraints remain that need to be overcome to reap the benefits of plant ecological
knowledge in practical agriculture. Some of these challenges relate to future research
needs, whereas others to costs and benefits of ecological interventions, grower
8
acceptance of new approaches, and the need to develop incentives and motivational
programs to encourage farmers to adopt ecology-based sustainable approaches. While
individual papers identify challenges and recommendations for integrating particular
aspects of plant ecology into sustainable agriculture, we highlight three major steps
that we believe need to be taken to fully realize the potential of plant ecological
approaches to contribute to the challenge of producing more food in a sustainable
way.
First, as identified by Wiener (2017), sustainable food production needs to be
placed as a primary goal of food production systems. As highlighted by others (e.g.,
Godfray et al. 2010), the goal of agriculture should not be to just maximize
production; rather it should optimize multiple benefits, including those to be gained
from plant ecology-based interventions considered here, which can bolster yields and
their nutritional value, but also wider ecosystem services and their resilience to
environmental change and extreme climate events. To achieve this, however, will
require transformational change in farm systems.
Second, while plant ecological knowledge can inform sustainable agriculture
now, important knowledge gaps remain. For instance, research is needed to optimize
mixtures and rotations for specific farm and environmental contexts, and to determine
how landscape-scale biodiversity influences ecosystem services and their resilience to
environmental change. This ecological research can help to identify sustainable
cropping systems (e.g., no-till agriculture) while planting genetically modified,
herbicide-tolerant (GMO) crops (Gibson et al. 2015), and in the context of the
evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds (Gage et al. 2015; Owen et al. 2015). Also,
there is a need for improved understanding of the scaling of ecological processes
across highly fragmented agricultural landscapes, and for greater knowledge of the
mechanisms by which root-microbial interactions influence nutrient supply and plant
defence in different agricultural settings, including those challenged by nutrient poor
soils. We also need to better harness evolutionary processes in crop breeding
programs and identify traits that not only relate to yield and nutritional quality, but
also have wider benefits, for instance for soil health.
Finally, to fully reap the benefits of plant ecology-based interventions in
sustainable agriculture will require practical approaches to their implementation to be
developed and deployed, which requires translational research and engagement with
farmers, policy makers, breeders, and agricultural scientists. Further, these approaches
9
will not only rely on improved understanding of social and economic constraints to
the adoption of new ecology-based approaches, and of their costs and benefits, but
also educational and motivational programs to encourage farmers to adopt new
approaches. We very much hope that you enjoy reading the papers in this Special
Feature of Journal of Ecology, which highlight the many and varied ways that plant
ecological knowledge can contribute to the global challenge of producing food in a
sustainable way.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all the authors of this Special Feature for their contributions and to
James Ross for his help in putting it together.
Data Accessibility
This paper has no data
Author Contributions
RDB and DJG jointly conceived and wrote the paper
References
Austin, A.T., Bustamante, M.M.C., Nardoto, G.B., Mitre, S.K., Pérez, T., Ometto,
J.P.H.B., Ascarrunz, N.L., Forti, M.C., Longo, K.M., Gavito, M.E. &
Martinelli, L.A. (2013) Latin America's nitrogen challenge. Science, 340, 149-
149.
Bardgett, R. D. & Van der Putten, W. H. (2014) Belowground biodiversity and
ecosystem functioning. Nature, 515, 505-511.
Becher, M. A., Osborne, J. L., Thorbek, P., Kennedy, P. J. & Grimm, V. (2013)
Review: Towards a systems approach for understanding honeybee decline: a
stocktaking and synthesis of existing models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50,
868–880.
Berendsen, R.L., Pieterse, C.M.J. & Bakker, P.A.H.M (2012) The rhizosphere
microbiome and plant health. Trends in Plant Science, 17, 478-486.
10
Bullock, J.M. Dhanjal-Adams, K.L., Milne, A., Oliver, T.H., Todman, L.C.,
Whitmore, A.P. & Pywell, R.F. (2017) Resilience and food security:
rethinking an ecological concept. Journal of Ecology, 105, in press.
Burkle, L., Delphia, C., & O’Neill, K. (2017) A dual role for farmlands: food security
and pollinator conservation. Journal of Ecology, 105, in press.
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P.,
Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G.
C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A., Srivastava, D. S. & Naeem, S.
(2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486, 59-67.
De Vries, F.T. & Wallenstein, M.D. (2017) Belowground connections underlying
aboveground food production: a framework for optimising ecological
connections in the rhizosphere. Journal of Ecology, 105, in press.
Ericksen, P.J (2008) Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change
research. Global Environmental Change, 18, 234-245.
FAO (2015) Status of the World’s Soil Resources. Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome,
Italy
Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A., Cassidy, E.S., Gerber, J.S., Johnston,
M., Mueller, N.D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D.K., West, P.C., Balzer, C., Bennett,
E.M., Carpenter, S.R., Hill, J., Monfreda, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J.,
Sheehan, J., Sienert, S., Tilman, D. & Zaks, D.P.M. (2011) Solutions for a
cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337-342.
Gage, K. L., Gibson, D. J., Young, B. G., Young, J. M., Matthews, J. L., Weller, S.
C., & Wilson, R. G. (2015) Occurrence of an herbicide‐resistant plant trait in
agricultural field margins. Ecology and Evolution, 5, 4161-4173.
Gersani, M., O'Brien, E. E., Maina, G. M., & Abramsky, Z. (2001) Tragedy of the
commons as a result of root competition. Journal of Ecology, 89, 660-669.
Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F.,
Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S.M. & Toulmin, C. (2010) Food security:
The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327, 812-818.
Gould, I. J., Quinton, J. N., Weigelt, A., De Deyn, G. B. & Bardgett, R. D. (2016)
Plant diversity and root traits benefit physical properties key to soil function in
grasslands. Ecology Letters, 19, 1140-1149.
11
Gibson, D.J., Young, B.G., Owen,, M.D.K. Gage, K.L., Matthews, J.L., Jordan, D.L.,
Shaw, D.R., Weller, S.C., & Wilson, R.G. (2015) Benchmark study on
glyphosate‐resistant cropping systems in the United States. Part 7: Effects of
weed management strategy (grower practices versus academic
recommendations) on the weed soil seedbank over 6 years. Pest Management
Science, 72, 692-700.
Gibson, D.J., Young, B.G., & Wood, A.J. (2017) Can weeds enhance profitability?
Integrating ecological concepts to address crop-weed competition and yield
quality. Journal of Ecology, 105, in press.
Harper, J.L. (1977) Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London.
Hartley, S. E. & Gange, A. C. (2009) Impacts of plant symbiotic fungi on insect
herbivores: mutualism in a multitrophic context. Annual Review of
Entomology, 54, 323-342.
Hutchings, M. J., Gibson, D. J., Bardgett, R. D., Rees, M., Newton, E., Baier, A. and
Sandhu, L. (2012) Tansley’s vision for Journal of Ecology, and a Centenary
Celebration. Journal of Ecology, 100, 1–5.
Hector, A. & Bagchi, R. (2007) Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality.
Nature, 448, 188-190.
Hess, L. & De Kroon, H. (2007) Effects of rooting volume and nutrient availability as
an alternative explanation for root self/non-self discrimination. Journal of
Ecology, 95, 241–251.
Isbell, F., Adler, P.R., Eisenhauer, N., Fornara, D., Kimmel1, K., Kremen, C.,
Letourneau, D.K., Liebman, M., Polley, H.W., Quijas, S. & Scherer-Lorenzen,
M. (2017) Benefits of increasing plant diversity in sustainable
agroecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 105, in press.
Isbell, F., Craven, D., Connolly, J., Loreau, M., Schmid, B., Beierkuhnlein, C.,
Bezemer, T. M., Bonin, C., Bruelheide, H., de Luca, E., Ebeling, A., Griffin, J.
N., Guo, Q., Hautier, Y., Hector, A., Jentsch, A., Kreyling, J., Lanta, V.,
Manning, P., Meyer, S. T., Mori, A. S., Naeem, S., Niklaus, P. A., Polley, H.
W., Reich, P. B., Roscher, C., Seabloom, E. W., Smith, M. D., Thakur, M. P.,
Tilman, D., Tracy, B. F., van der Putten, W. H., van Ruijven, J., Weigelt, A.,
Weisser, W. W., Wilsey, B. & Eisenhauer, N. (2015) Biodiversity increases
the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature, 526,
574-577.
12
Keddy, P.A. (2015) Competition in Plant Communities. Oxford University Press.
Koricheva, J., Gange, A. C. & Jones, T. (2009) Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on insect
herbivores: a meta-analysis. Ecology, 90, 2088-2097.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being,
World Resources Institute.
Murphy, G., Swanton, C., van Acker, R., & Dudley, S. (2017) Kin recognition,
multilevel selection and altruism in crop sustainability. Journal of Ecology,
105, in press.
Oliver, T.H., Heard, M.S., Isaac, N.J.B., Roy, D.B., Procter, D., Eigenbrod, F.,
Freckleton, R., Hector, A., Orme, D.L., Petchey, O.L., Proenca, V., Raffaelli,
D., Suttle, K.B., Mace, G.M., Martin-Lopez, B., Woodcock, B.A. & Bullock,
J.M. (2015) Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends in
Ecology & Evolution, 30, 673-684.
Owen, M. D., Beckie, H. J., Leeson, J. Y., Norsworthy, J. K., & Steckel, L. E. (2015)
Integrated pest management and weed management in the United States and
Canada. Pest Management Science, 71, 357-376.
Reyer, C. P., Brouwers, N., Rammig, A., Brook, B. W., Epila, J., Grant, R. F., ... &
Medlyn, B. (2015) Forest resilience and tipping points at different spatio‐
temporal scales: approaches and challenges. Journal of Ecology, 103, 5-15.
Rillig, M. C. & Mummey, D. L. (2006) Mycorrhizas and soil structure. New
Phytologist, 171, 41- 53.
Semchenko, M., Hutchings, M. J. & John, E. A. (2007) Challenging the tragedy of the
commons in root competition: confounding effects of neighbour presence and
substrate volume. Journal of Ecology, 95, 252–260.
Sutherland, W. J., Freckleton, R. P., Godfray, H. C. J., Beissinger, S. R., Benton, T.,
Cameron, D. D., Carmel, Y., Coomes, D. A., Coulson, T., Emmerson, M. C.,
Hails, R. S., Hays, G. C., Hodgson, D. J., Hutchings, M. J., Johnson, D.,
Jones, J. P. G., Keeling, M. J., Kokko, H., Kunin, W. E., Lambin, X., Lewis,
O. T., Malhi, Y., Mieszkowska, N., Milner-Gulland, E. J., Norris, K.,
Phillimore, A. B., Purves, D. W., Reid, J. M., Reuman, D. C., Thompson, K.,
Travis, J. M. J., Turnbull, L. A., Wardle, D. A. & Wiegand, T. (2013)
Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions. Journal of Ecology,
101, 58–67.
13
Thirkell, T. J., Charters, M., Elliott, A., Sait, S.M. & Field, K.J. (2017) Are
mycorrhizal fungi our sustainable saviours? Considerations for achieving food
security. Journal of Ecology, 105, in press.
Tow, P.G., & A. Lazenby. (2001) Competition and Succession in Pastures. CABI
Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
Turesson, G. (1922) The selective effect of climate upon the plant species. Heriditas
14, 99-152.
Van der Heijden, M.G.A., Bardgett, R.D. & van Straalen, N.M. (2008) The unseen
majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in
terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 11, 296-310.
Weiner, J. (2017) Applying plant ecological knowledge to increase agricultural
sustainability. Journal of Ecology, 105, in press.
de Wit, C.T. (1960) On competition. Verslagen Can Landouskundige Onderzoekingen
66, 1-82.
Wolkovich, E., Burge, D., Walker, M., & Nicholas, K. (2017) Phenological diversity
provides opportunities for climate change adaptations in winegrapes. Journal
of Ecology, 105, in press.
Zimdahl, R.L. (2004) Weed-Crop Competition: A Review, 2nd edition. Blackwell
Publishing, Oxford, UK.
14
Fig. 1. Schematic illustrating some of the main ways discussed in this Special Feature
that plant ecology can contribute to sustainable food production. (Photo credit
Bryan Young: US soybean (Glycine max) field infested with the weed
waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus)).
15