Planning for Restoration of the Mississippi River in the Twin Cities Christian Lenhart.
-
Upload
cynthia-hines -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Planning for Restoration of the Mississippi River in the Twin Cities Christian Lenhart.
Planning for Restoration of the Mississippi River in the Twin Cities
Christian Lenhart
Purpose of talk:
1 Importance of issue: The gorge and falls as Minnesota landmarks
2 History of alteration
3 Certain restoration actions are possible
4 Now is the time to plan for it
Potential fish and mussel species benefiting from rapids restoration
Others- sturgeon & paddlefish
Current species likely to benefit: walleye, smallmouth bass
Times are changing: A new vision is needed
Declining barge traffic, closure of upper harbor Economic benefits of barge traffic to Mnpls are questionableConversion from industrial to commercial / condosHigh cost of lock & dam maintenance and repair in long term. Infrastructure decayNew approaches for valuation of ecological servicesPotential benefits are highMore parkland: Ft. Snelling example
What can be restored or enhanced?
Improve fish passage, reduce fisheries impacts at Ford DamWater level management over all 3 dams for water quality, habitat improvements and seasonal whitewater recreationRestore islands and floodplain habitats by use of dredge material and/or water level drawdownImproved public accessNaturalize St. Anthony Falls to look like a waterfall again?
Sample restoration project
St.Paul
MinneapolisRestoration components :
• island (new regional or state park)
•side/channel + rapids
• public access
Alternatives
Army Corps alternatives in Environmental Management Plan for Pool One
DNR, USFWS and others recommendations at Ford Dam (2004)
Benefits of restorationEcological• Restoration of a Minnesota natural landmark• Improved habitat for fish, mussels, birds• Fish passage and spawning grounds reestablished• Improvements to water quality by flow level management ?
Recreation and aesthetics• Parkland created by floodplain / islands (100s of acres) in the city• Aesthetic attraction of falls and rapids• Whitewater recreation in densely populated area• Improved access to rivers for recreation, viewing• Rock features – caves/caverns exposed, access to side waterfalls
Economic Benefits
Riverfront development and enhanced property values
Supports conversion towards residential/ recreational – Above the Falls plan
Increased recreation/tourist traffic Decreased tax dollars spent on maintaining
locks
Recommendations
Collect and synthesize existing information
Assess feasibility of restoration options
Account for full ecological costs
Plan for future now
Proposed study
Department of BioProducts and Biosystems Engineering proposal to collect and synthesize existing information and assess feasibililty of restoration options – John Nieber, myself, & others
Partners: Mississippi Watershed Management Organization, MNDNR, Great River Greening, National Park Service (MNRRA), U of M – Pat Nunnally & Mississippi River Initiative