Planned presentation for the S&OP Chicago IE Event for Consumer Products
-
Upload
lora-cecere-supply-chain-insights -
Category
Business
-
view
720 -
download
7
description
Transcript of Planned presentation for the S&OP Chicago IE Event for Consumer Products
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Supply Chain Insights
What does Good Look Like?
BRICKSMatterThe Role of Supply Chains in Building Market-Driven Differentiation
LORA M. CECERE CHARLES W. CHASE JR.
BookPublishes in August
2012
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 20123
What’s in a name?
A rose by any other name would smell as
sweet.
William Shapespeare
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Integrated business planning (IBP) refers to the technologies, applications and processes of connecting the planning function across the enterprise to improve organizational alignment and financial performance. IBP accurately represents a holistic model of the company in order to link strategic planning, and operational planning, with financial planning. By deploying a single model across the enterprise and leveraging the organization’s information assets, corporate executives, business unit heads and planning managers use IBP to evaluate plans and activities based on the true economic impact of each consideration.
Sales and operations planning (S&OP) is an integrated business management process through which the executive/leadership team continually achieves focus, alignment and synchronization among all functions of the organization. The S&OP plan includes an updated sales plan, production plan, inventory plan, customer lead time (backlog) plan, new product development plan, strategic initiative plan and resulting financial plan. Plan frequency and planning horizon depend on the specifics of the industry. Short product life cycles and high demand volatility require a tighter S&OP planning as steadily consumed products. Done well, the S&OP process also enables effective supply chain management.
What is in a name?
4
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 20125
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
What is the goal?
How do we make decisions?
What do we measure?
The Questions to Ask
6
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
What is the goal?
How do we make decisions?
What do we measure?
The Questions to Ask
7
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Supply Chain Organization
Base: Total Sample (117)Q5. Please tell us how you define your company’s supply chain organization by selecting
which function(s) report through the supply chain organization. Please select all that apply.Q7. To whom does your supply chain organization report?
Supply Chain Planning (Supply)
Supply Chain Planning (Demand)
Inventory
Deliver (Distribution)
Transportation
Source (Procurement)
Make (Manufacturing)
Customer Service
80%
72%
63%
56%
52%
51%
38%
37%
Functions Reporting Through Supply Chain
Chief Operating Officer
Gen Mgr of Business Unit (P&L Owner)
Leader of Manufacturing
Chief Financial Officer
Head of Procurement
Chief Information Officer
43%
26%
12%
9%
3%
2%
Supply Chain Leader
69% Profit Center
Managers
S&OP Evolution
Manufacturing-Driven
Deliver a Feasible Plan for Operations
Match Demand with Supply
Sales Driven
Match Demandwith Supply
Business-planning Driven
Maximize Profitability
Demand Driven
Maximize Opportunity Sense and
Shape Demand
Market Driven
Maximize Opportunity and Mitigate Risk. Orchestrate
DemandMarket to Market
Greater Benefit• Growth• Resilience• Efficiency
Yes 87%
No 10%
Not sure 3%
Have a Sales & Operations Planning Process
S&OP ProcessExistence, Goals & Processes
Base: Total Sample (117) Q17. Does your company have a Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) process? A S&OP process is a tactical
planning process to forecast sales and plan operations.Base: Have a S&OP process (102)
Q18. Which one of the following best defines the goal of your current S&OP process? Q19. How many distinct S&OP processes does your company currently have? Your best estimate is fine. OPEN-
ENDED
Match demand with supply
Maximize opportunity and mitigate risk
Develop a feasible plan
Determine the most profitable plan
Other
43%
32%
14%
8%
3%
S&OP Process Goal
1 2 3 4 5 More than 5
27%14% 20%
12% 9%19%
# Distinct S&OP Processes
5 S&OP processes on average
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
What is the goal?
How do we make decisions?
What do we measure?
The Questions to Ask
11
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
CostVolumeGrowth
Typical Organization12
CEO
Chief Customer
Officer
Chief Marketing
OfficerSales
Account Teams
COO
VP of Supply Chain
Customer Service Procurement Logistics
CFO
CIO
VP of Manufacturin
g
Quality
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
A Supply Chain is a Complex System with Complex Processes with Increasing Complexity
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
An Athlete Needs:
Strength
Flexibility Balance
What is Agility?
Base: Total Sample (117)Q11. How would you define what it means for your company’s supply chain to be “agile”?
Please select the one that fits best.
49%
38%
10%3%
How Define Supply Chain “Agility”Shorter supply
cyclesFlexibility to make and deliver whatever is
ordered
Ability to adapt to
variations in demand and
supply
Ability to recalibrate plans in the face of mar-ket, demand and supply volatility and deliver the
same or comparable cost, quality and cus-
tomer service
Agility Importance vs. Performance
Base: Total Sample (117)Q12. How important is it for your company’s supply chain to be “agile” in 2012? Please
base your answer on however your company defines agility.Q13. How would you currently rate your company’s supply chain in terms of being “agile”?
Importance Performance
89%
27%
5%
32%
6%
40%
Agility Importance vs. Performance (7-Point Scale)
Low (1-3)
Middle (4)
High (5-7)
62 % Points(Gap in Performance
vs. Importance)
Agility Today vs. Past
Base: Total Sample (117)Q14. How would you compare your supply chain’s current agility to 1 year ago? How about
compared to 5 years ago?
Vs. 1 Year AgoVs. 5 Years Ago
38%
68%
54%
17%
9%15%
Agility vs. 5 Years Ago, 1 Year Ago
LESS Agile
Just as Agile
MORE Agile
Ongoing Increases in Agility
Sell Deliver Make Source
Network Design: Probability of Demand
Channel Design. Cost-to-Serve Analysis
Network Design Supplier Network. Supplier Rationalization
Supply Chain TacticalPlanning: Demand Forecast
Category Management
Sales and Operations PlanningNew Product Launch
Category Management
Supply Chain Policy: Demand Shaping
Contract Management
Corporate Social ResponsibilityRevenue Management
Working Capital Management
Contract Management
Market-driven Signal Management
Demand/ Channel Sensing
Demand OrchestrationDemand Translation
Supplier Sensing
Transactional Processing: Order and Shipment Processing
Order Management
Order-to-CashProcure-to-Pay
Purchase Order Management
The Role of Demand Signals in Becoming Market Driven
Manufacturing View (
Units)
Sales View ($) Marketing View
($, U
nits)
Logistics View
(Units, Cases)
Ship-from Locations
Warehouses
Global
Production L
inesPlants
Global
Supply-side Views
Downstream Data
Account-LevelA
VMI C
DistributionNetwork
Supplier Supplier Supplier Supplier
DistributionNetwork
DistributionNetwork
Demand-side Views
Hole in Enterprise Architectures
Manufacturing View (
Units)
Channel View ($)
Accounts (Ship-to
locations
Countries
Global
Marketing View
($, U
nits)
Brands
Produ
ct
Catego
ries
Global
Logistics View
(Units, Cases)
Ship-from Locations
Warehouses
Global
Production L
inesPlants
Global
Supply-side Views
DemandTranslation
Downstream Data
Account-LevelA
VMI C
DistributionNetwork
Supplier Supplier Supplier Supplier
DistributionNetwork
DistributionNetwork
Demand-side Views
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 201222
Business Planning
Forecasting
Constrained Forecast
Increasing levels of granularity
Increasing need for value network strategy alignment
A Forecast is not a Forecast is not a Forecast
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Value: Price, trade incentives, new products, services, freshness, responsiveness
Variety: Configurations, items, platforms, components, brands, processing technologies
Velocity: Lead-times, order to delivery, inventory turns, time to market
Volatility: Demand, inventory, schedules, reliability, yields
Volume: Plants, warehouses, distribution centers/points, product flow
What drives Variability?
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Getting to Letter Perfect….Common Practice Market-driven Focus
S Ask sales Focus on market drivers:How do we best shape demand?
& Direct integration to supply Design of the value chain to optimize trade-offs, minimize risk, balance cycles, and orchestrate demand
OP Manufacturing plan Trade-offs between make, source and deliver
24
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
The Need for Balance
25
S: Go-to-Market
Strategies
OP: Demand Orchestration
Commodity Strategies
Network Strategies: Make/Source & Deliver
Inventory: Form & Function
Competition
Market Drivers
&
Goal
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
What is the goal?
How do we make decisions?
What do we measure?
The Questions to Ask
26
S&OP ProcessPlan Execution
Base: Have a S&OP process (102)Q25. After your S&OP plan is generated, how is it executed? Please pick the one that
describes it best.
Execution is not connected to S&OP plan
We try to execute the S&OP plan, but hardly do in practice
We execute the S&OP plan most of the time
We execute the S&OP plan nearly all of the time
We monitor market events and adjust to S&OP plan within limits
9%
25%
35%
19%
13%
S&OP Plan Execution
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 201228
Stage 2: Benefits received from S&OP processes What benefits have you received from your work with S&OP processes?
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Historically, we have:
• Tried to get precise on inaccurate data.
• Believed that the most efficient supply chain is the most effective supply chain.
• Built efficient chains, but not effective networks.
• Focused inside-out, not outside-in.
• Rewarded the urgent, not the important.
29
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Comparison of Revenue/Employee for the Period of 2000-2011
P&G Colgate Unilever Kimberly-Clark Nestle Kraft
Re
ve
nu
e/T
ho
us
an
ds
of
Em
plo
ye
e
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
Comparison of EBIT/Employee for the Period of 2000-2011
P&G Colgate UnileverKimberly-Clark Nestle Kraft
EB
IT/E
mp
loye
e
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201050
55
60
65
70
75
80
Consumer Products: Comparison of Days of Inventory
P&G Colgate Unilever Nestle Kraft
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201140%
45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
Consumer Products: Cost of Sales as a Percentage of Revenue
Unilever Kellogg Kraft General Mills Campbell HersheyP & G
Co
st
of
Sa
les
as
a %
of
Re
vn
ue
Goal
A feasible plan • Model the network• Recognize and respect
constraints• Gain plan visibility
Match demand with supply • What-if analysis• Multi-tier inventory analysis• Network design
Deliver the most profitable Plan
• Demand translation• Supply orchestration• Optimize financial drivers
Demand-driven • Sense channel demand• Shape demand• Drive the most profitable
response
Market-driven • Sense buy and sell-side market conditions
• Bi-directionally orchestrate demand
Technology
34Demand Planning Supply Planning Inventory Planning Demand Translation Platform
Key: Financial Planning Market Sensing
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
What is the goal?
How do we make decisions?
What do we measure?
Ask the Right Questions
35
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Who is Lora?•Founder of Supply Chain Insights
•Partner at Altimeter Group (leader in open
research)
•7 years of Management Experience leading
Analyst Teams at Gartner and AMR Research
•8 years Experience in Marketing and Selling
Supply Chain Software at Descartes Systems
Group and Manugistics (now JDA)
•15 Years Leading teams in Manufacturing and
Distribution operations for Clorox,
Kraft/General Foods, Nestle/Dreyers Grand
Ice Cream and Procter & Gamble.
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Where do you find Lora?
Contact Information:
Blog: www.supplychainshaman.com
(3500 pageviews/month)
Twitter: lcecere 2900 followers. Rated
as the top rated supply chain social
network user.
Linkedin:
linkedin.com/pub/lora-cecere/0/196/573
(2300 in the network)