PlaNiTulsa Scenarios Transportation Highlights 051509
-
Upload
fregoneseassociates -
Category
Business
-
view
493 -
download
1
description
Transcript of PlaNiTulsa Scenarios Transportation Highlights 051509
ScenarioTransportationHighlights
This slideshow highlights the range of transportation alternatives and outcomes for each of the four PLANiTulsa
scenarios
Comparing the Scenarios
SCENARIO A
Tulsa’s transportation investments go almost entirely to roads
New Road Investments New Transit Investments
Scenario A Transit
Commuter Rail
Light Rail
Streetcar
Bus Rapid Transit
High Frequency Bus
Express Bus
SCENARIO A
SCENARIO A
SCENARIO A
SCENARIO A
SCENARIO A
SCENARIO B
About 41% of transportation investments are devoted to transit
New Road Investments New Transit Investments
Scenario B Transit
Commuter Rail
Light Rail
Streetcar
Bus Rapid Transit
High Frequency Bus
Express Bus
SCENARIO B
SCENARIO B
SCENARIO B
SCENARIO B
SCENARIO B
About 41% of transportation investments are devoted to transit
New Road Investments New Transit Investments
SCENARIO C
Scenario C Transit
Commuter Rail
Light Rail
Streetcar
Bus Rapid Transit
High Frequency Bus
Express Bus
SCENARIO C
SCENARIO C
SCENARIO C
SCENARIO C
SCENARIO C
Most transportation investments are devoted to transit
New Road Investments New Transit Investments
SCENARIO D
Scenario D Transit
Commuter Rail
Light Rail
Streetcar
Bus Rapid Transit
High Frequency Bus
Express Bus
SCENARIO D
SCENARIO D
SCENARIO D
SCENARIO D
SCENARIO D
How Tulsans Will Get Around
Investment priorities will have a have a big impact on how Tulsans get around
How Much Time In the Car
Each scenario also has a big impact on how much time Tulsans will spend in the car
Other Indicators
1,526 1,526 1,526 1,526
604 504 454 434
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
A B C D
Added Lane-Miles
Existing Lane-Miles
New Lane-Miles of Road Constructed
Scenario A would result in more total lane miles than the others.
Other Indicators
21.1
6.94.5 4.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
A B C D
Lane MilesAdded per1,000 NewResidents
Lane Miles of New Road Per 1,000 New Residents
On per-capita basis, Scenario A would require more new roads for fewer new residents.
Other Indicators
303133
40
0
10
20
30
40
A B C D
VMT per capita(miles)
Per Capita Vehicle Miles Traveled (City)
Scenarios B, C, and D would result in Tulsans driving fewer miles than Scenario A.
Other Indicators
8,760,000
10,290,0009,420,00010,730,000
0
2,500,000
5,000,000
7,500,000
10,000,000
A B C D
Gallons of FuelWastedAnnually
Gallons of Fuel Wasted Annually Due to Congestion
Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of fuel wasted due to traffic congestion
Other Indicators
$283
$332$304$346
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
A B C D
Value of TimeLost (per year)
Citywide Value of Time Lost Due to Congestion (Annually, in millions)
Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of lost time due to traffic congestion.
PLANiTULSA Transportation Element
Excerpted presentation from PLANiTulsa’s transportation consultant, Kimley-Horn and
AssociatesPreparing the PLANiTulsa
Transportation
Element includes 3 components:•
Public participation (hands-on and survey)
•
Technical Analysis•
Local expert input
Regional Survey Results
22%
9%
6%
6%
5%
11%
9%
7%
5%
33%
41%
31%
29%
27%
16%
16%
11%
11%
25%
25%
34%
33%
32%
25%
27%
29%
23%
20%
25%
30%
33%
36%
48%
48%
54%
62%
Ease of travel from your home to work
Ease of travel by car on highways
Ease of east/west travel
Ease of north/south travel
Ease of travel by car on major city streets
Ease of travel by walking
Trans. services (seniors&persons w/disabilities)
Ease of travel by bicycle
Adequacy of public transportation services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Very Satisfied (5) Satisfied (4) Neutral (3) Dissatisfied (1/2)
Satisfaction with Various Aspects ofTransportation in the Tulsa Area
by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale (excluding don't knows)
Source: ETC Institute (August 2008)
PLANiTulsa
Survey Results
Level of satisfaction with Tulsa’s transportation system:
Very satisfied 27%Somewhat satisfied 43%Not satisfied 29%
Source: US Census (2000)
How Tulsans Get Around Town
http://www.cornelius-tulsa.com/Misc._-_Downtown.jpg
Source:
Tulsa: INCOG (2006)Albuquerque: Mid-Region COG (2000)Charlotte: Kimley-Horn & Associates (2000)Salt Lake City: Wasatch Front Regional Council (2005)
Comparison: Roadways and Transit
Metro Population: 729,649
City Population: 448,607
Transit Ridership: 8,751,698
Total Lane Miles: 2,334
Albuquerque, NM
Metro Population: 1,330,448
City Population: 540,828
Transit Ridership: 21,176,801
Total Lane Miles: 1,274
http://www.lightrailnow.org/images02/sj-lrt-inaugural-trn-ar- Downtown-Campbell-stn-pax-20051001x_Peter-Ehrlich.jpg
http://www.uncc.edu/admissions/tour/downtown.html
Charlotte, NC
Source: National Transit Database (2006)
Transit Indicators: Ridership Comparison
Metro Population: 968,858
City Population: 181,743
Transit Ridership: 38,594,690
Total Lane Miles: 864
2007 Recipient American Planning Association “Great Streets” Designation: South Temple Street
Salt Lake City, UT
Tulsa
San FranciscoSalt Lake City
Boston
Network Design
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/107/315072192_27861ff3e4.jpg?v=0
Cost of Transportation
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/107/315072192_27861ff3e4.jpg?v=0
Highway and Roadway Network Capacity• Many opportunities for redesign and construction to achieve higher performance
Multi-modal Demand•Opportunity for street scale urban redesign of arterials that will create new economic opportunities
Transit Capacity•Potential for increased commuter transit along congested freeway corridors and new transit markets
Technical Findings
POTENTIAL TRANSPORTATION TOOLS
Street Level Urban RedesignPotential corridors for this tool
Low Congestion = Flexibility in Design
Gridley, California:
State Highway 99
Street Level Urban RedesignA redesign can do many things to improve the function, appearance and safety of a roadway. It can be accomplished by:
- Removing lanes from a multi-lane roadway- 4 lane to 3 lane conversions- Create parking and/or bike lanes out of existing lanes
- Widening sidewalks to encourage pedestrian activity
Potential Transportation Tools
Four-Lane Undivided Roadway Conversion to a Three-Lane Cross Section are viable for roadways with a maximum ADT of 16,000. They have been accomplished up to 24,000 ADT.
Street-scale Urban Redesign
Cotati, California:
Old Redwood Highway looking north
Highway Urban Redesign: Example: Seoul, South Korea
http://www.cornelius-tulsa.com/Misc._-_Downtown.jpg
Volume/Capacity Analysis: Lanes with Level of Service D or Worse
Regional Commuter RailCommuter rail service connects the large master planned communities around the region, the surrounding towns and villages, and even nearby cities, with the urban core.
Potential Transportation Tools
Rapid Transit TechnologiesBus Rapid Transit has the unique ability to function in either an exclusive right-of-way or in mixed traffic, however, the most common application assumes an exclusive right-of-way for operational efficiency and safety.
E 71st Street
Potential Transportation Tools
The following slides summarize a variety of transportation improvements that Tulsa could potentially use over the next 30 years.
Potential Transportation Tools
Bus Rapid TransitBus Rapid Transit
BUS RAPID TRANSIT-Functions in exclusive R.O.W. to increase efficiency-Station spacing: 1-2 miles
Source” http://www.streetsblog.org
Express BusExpress Bus
EXPRESS BUS CORRIDOR-Functions in mixed traffic- Station spacing: ½ Mile- Intelligent system operation
- Priority & Preemption- Real-time transit information systems- GPS tracking
www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov
Light RailLight Rail
LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT- Functions in exclusive R.O.W. or in traffic- Station spacing: 1-2 miles
Commuter RailCommuter Rail
COMMUTER RAIL- Functions in exclusive R.O.W. on owned or existing freight rail lines - Station spacing: 2-5 miles
Source: http://fdot-srtna.c-b.com/fdotdocumentreview/PressPackage.htm
IrvineIrvine
StreetcarStreetcar
STREETCAR- Functions in mixed traffic- Station spacing: ¼ mile
Source: Chris Phan/Flickr
Roadway WideningRoadway Widening
COMMUTER CORRIDORS- Access managed principal arterials
Source: Dan Burden
IrvineIrvine
New RoadwayNew Roadway
IrvineIrvine
MultiMulti--Modal Street Modal Street DesignDesign
MULTI-MODAL CORRIDORS- Emphasis in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure- Connected pathways and bikeways-Increases ability to use alternative modes to reach destinations
Source: CompleteStreets.org
IrvineIrvine
MultiMulti--Use PathUse Path
Transit Oriented Development
TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT- Higher density development- Pedestrian friendly-
50% reduction in trips during peak hours