Plan.be Uncertainty surrounding output gap estimates The Belgian case Igor Lebrun Workshop on...
-
Upload
brooke-martina-fox -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Plan.be Uncertainty surrounding output gap estimates The Belgian case Igor Lebrun Workshop on...
plan.beplan.be
Uncertainty surrounding output gap estimatesThe Belgian case
Igor Lebrun
Workshop on Potential Growth and Fiscal Challenges, Brussels, 27 October 2009
plan.beplan.be
Key stylized facts on output losses associated with financial crises (1)
IMF World Economic Outlook (Sept 2009):
Output does not recover to pre-crisis trend
Medium-term growth rates tend to return to the pre-crisis rate
The output loss results from reductions in roughly equal proportions in the employment rate, the capital-to-labour ratio and TFP
plan.beplan.be
Key stylized facts on output losses associated with financial crises (2)
But variation in outcomes across country experiences is substantial:
The higher the short-term output losses or the pre-crisis investment share the larger the medium-term output damage
Macroeconomic stimulus in the short run is associated with smaller medium-term output losses
A favorable external environment is also generally associated with smaller medium-term output losses
plan.beplan.be
The FPB’s medium-term spring scenario for Belgium is consistent with these stylized facts
plan.beplan.be
The FPB’s medium-term spring scenario for Belgium is consistent with these stylized facts
Output loss
plan.beplan.be
Potential growth and contributions
2006-2008 2009-2010 2011-2017
OECD FPB OECD FPB OECD FPB
Potential GDP 2.5 1.8 1.8 1.2 1.0 1.6
Productivity 1.3 0.7 1.2 0.6 1.2 1.1
Employment 1.2 1.1 0.6 0.6 -0.2 0.6
Working age population
1.0 0.9 0.9 0.6 -0.1 0.3
Participation rate
0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2
NAIRU 0.0 0.0 -0.4 -0.2 -0.1 0.1
plan.beplan.be
Behind technical differences, contrasting views of history?
Did we experience a “bust without a boom”?
If yes, potential output before the outbreak of the crisis should not be revised
If no, potential GDP has been overestimated in the years preceding the crisis, lulled by global disinflation
These two contrasting views have implications on the stance of monetary and fiscal policy before the crisis
plan.beplan.be
Implications for potential GDP computations
Has TFP (and employment) growth been temporarily boosted by the imbalances at the origin of the crisis?
The method of the Commission gives an implicit “yes” to the question
Or shall we solely take into account the consequences of the crisis on the supply-side conditions?
The approach adopted by the OECD responds with a more explicit “yes” by considering only the impact on the capital stock and the unemployment rate
plan.beplan.be
Both approaches have their merits and limits“Rules versus discretion”
EC method does not circumvent the problem of trend TFP and NAIRU levels before the crisis but:
Applying HP filter on Solow residuals may be too mechanical
Risk that Kalman filter generates too pro-cyclical structural unemployment rates
OECD method has more economic underpinning but:
Some effects may be lacking
Impact on output gap of switch from smoothed to actual capital services series not straightforward
NAIRU evolutions are only guided by hysteresis effects
plan.beplan.be
Conclusions (1)
Consensus among economists that the crisis is likely to have a permanent impact on the level of potential GDP.
But great uncertainty remains regarding:
The total amount of output loss
The specific impact on each of the production factors
And the precise path of the adjustment which is crucial for potential growth and output gap estimates
plan.beplan.be
Conclusions (2)
We should bear in mind that next to the impact of the crisis, potential GDP estimates are also influenced by other factors:
Demographic projections
Impact of macroeconomic policies
Expected effects of structural reforms
Estimating potential GDP and output gaps in real time remains in essence a forecasting exercise!