Plan operati trimestrial.xls

DRAFT of 14

Data intocmirii Mar 12, 2015

Denumirea Plan Operativ Trimestrial - Start UP Partener 1 CCI Bacau

Data de incepere 2/9/15 Data de sfarsit 5/9/15

Planificarea activitatilor si a rezultatelor urmarite

Nr. CRT Activitatea Data de start Observatii - Comentarii Livrabile Responsabil

1. Managementul proiectului 9/2/15 9/12/15

1.1 11/3/15 20/03/2015 n

1.2 Elaborarea metodologiei de lucru 12/3/15 16/03/2015 ü

1.3Stabilirea procedurilor interne

3/22/05 m

1.4 Elaborarea fiselor posturilor Dupa 1.2 20/03/2015 m

11/3/15 16/03/2015

1.5 Dupa 1.4 m

2. Act.de promovare si publ. proj

2.1 Realizarea strategiei de comunicare

2.2

2.3 Organizarea conferintei de comunicare

2.4 Difuzarea spoturilor radio

2.5

2.6

Program operativ trimestrial - trim I mnüu

Data de start reala

Impact in proiect (fata de

obiective)

Data finalizarii actiunii si stadiu

Crearea cadrului organizational si asigurarea logisticii

Pregatirea achizitiilor de logistica necesara

Incheiere CIM-urilor si stabilirea responsabilitatilor

Receptia si distribuirea materialelor de informare a GT

m Neinceputn In derulareü Finalizatu Problematic - cu risc

Not Started m

On Plan n

Issues u

Complete ü

DRAFT of 14







Data de start reala


obiective)



Not Started m

On Plan n

Issues u

Complete ü

2.7

3. Organizarea Campaniei de Inf.a GT

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.8

4. Recrutare,selectie&inscriere GT

4.1

4.2

DRAFT of 14







Data de start reala


obiective)



Not Started m

On Plan n

Issues u

Complete ü

4.3

4.4

4.5

5. Consiliere, sprijin pt. initiere afaceri

5.1

5.2

5.3

5.4

5.5

5.6

5.7

DRAFT of 14







Data de start reala


obiective)



Not Started m

On Plan n

Issues u

Complete ü

5. Consiliere, sprijin pt. initiere afaceri 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7

5.7

Probleme majoreNr. Crt Descriere Observatii Statutul

1

Process IssuesSubject Area Action Required By Target Date Current Action

Resource Issues

Confidence of

Closure

L H

M

5 of 14

All Measurements Used in the ESMS Database

PM # Performance Measure BSC Framework Major Organizational Unit Function / Dept / Sub Group Measure Justification Definition Data Source PM Calculation Formula Actual FY 03

Def

initi

on

How do we define this measure?

1

2

3

4

5

6

Strategic Goal or Objective per BSC or Strategic Plan

Service or Product Line (if applicable)

Type of Measure Data Elements To Be Collected

Data Collection FrequencyD/W/M/Q/SA/A

What is the PM number for referencing. Could be LMR # or a unique number for local metrics?

What metric(s) should we use to measure whether we have met our requirements?

Is this measure a Customer, Process, Learn & Grow or Resources measure based on the BSC framework?

Insert major goals or objectives in this box as a reference in completing this template

Insert a list of the major organizational unit names in this box for reference in completing this template

Insert a Link here to reference back a list of Functions / Departments and other organizational units in completing this template

Insert the Operating Area such as Product or Service Line - To be used for Product Performance Analysis

Is this measure a1) Strategic 2) Operational 3) Tactical4) Individual

Why are we using this metric?

What are the data elements for caclulating the measure?

Where does the data reside?

How frequently should the data be collected?

What is the formula for calculating the measure?

What is the actual result of this measure for the Year 2003?

M3

Measure Justification Criterial Meaningful: Measureable: Actionable: Input/Output/Outcome: Lead/Lag:

6 of 14

All Measurements Used in the ESMS Database

PM # Performance Measure

Def

initi

on

1

2

3

4

5

6

What is the PM number for referencing. Could be LMR # or a unique number for local metrics?

What metric(s) should we use to measure whether we have met our requirements?

Actual FY 04 Green Standard Amber Standard Red Standard Primary Functional POC Data Available? Notes

Y/NWhat is the actual result of this measure for the Year 2004?

What is the Green Threshold?

What is the Amber Threshold?

What is the Red Threshold?

Who is the primary owner for the measure and their email address?

Are there any additional notes regarding the measure?

Balanced Scorecard Project

Gra

de

d A

ttri

bu

tes

Quality Review of Metrics

Review and score all measurements used in your scorecard model

F1.1 % Revenue Growth 4 4F1.2

F1.3

F1.4F2.1F2.2F2.3F2.4F3.1F3.2F3.3F3.4C1.1C1.2C1.3C1.4C2.1C2.2C2.3C2.4P1.1P1.2P1.3P1.4P2.1P2.2P2.3P2.4P3.1P3.2P3.3P3.4P4.1P4.2P4.3P4.4

L & G Objective (L1)

L1.1L1.2L1.3L1.4


L2.1L2.2L2.3L2.4


L3.1L3.2

Up

da

te F

req

ue

ncy

/

Re

pe

ata

ble

De

gre

e o

f R

elia

bili

ty

(Ha

rd D

ata

vs

.Su

bje

ctiv

e)

Financial Objective (F1)



Customer Objective (C1)

Customer Objective (P2)

Process Objective (P1)




L & G Objective (L3)L3.3L3.4

Instructions:Rate each Measurement for these attributes on a scale of 1 to 5:1. Update Frequency: Measurement can get updated on a regular basis; M for Monthly, Q for Quarterly, A for Annual, etc.2. Degree of Reliability: Can you easily measure the performance objective or is it too subjective when it comes to measurability.3. Encourages the right behavior: Measurements should not confuse, distort, or create the wrong performance behavior within the Organization. Controllable?4. Degree of Fit: Measurement fits with the culture and processes of Organization and flows well from Lower Level to Upper Level. (MACRO FIT - ORGANIZATIONAL)5. Degree of Support: Client has existing procedures and processes that can support the measurement (such as available data is in place)

Maximum Score 25

Le

ad

ing

or

La

gg

ing

3 4 5 20 80% Lagging Single0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%

En

cou

rag

es

the

rig

ht

be

ha

vio

r

De

gre

e o

f F

it w

ith

Clie

nt's

Cu

lture

De

gre

e o

f S

up

po

rt /

A

vaila

ble

In

fo

No

nG

rad

ed

A

ttri

bu

tes

Sin

gle

or

Ind

ex

Me

tric

Total Points

Overall Grade

0 0%0 0%

1. Update Frequency: Measurement can get updated on a regular basis; M for Monthly, Q for Quarterly, A for Annual, etc.2. Degree of Reliability: Can you easily measure the performance objective or is it too subjective when it comes to measurability.3. Encourages the right behavior: Measurements should not confuse, distort, or create the wrong performance behavior within the Organization. Controllable?4. Degree of Fit: Measurement fits with the culture and processes of Organization and flows well from Lower Level to Upper Level. (MACRO FIT - ORGANIZATIONAL)5. Degree of Support: Client has existing procedures and processes that can support the measurement (such as available data is in place)

Alignment Matrix

StrategicDrivers

Vision Mission Values

Critical Processes

Measures

Critical Levers

OrganizationMeasures

Tools

Project RosterName Area Location Desk Phone

Project Intranet Web Site ► www.intranets.com

http://www.intranets.com/

Cell Phone Email

Plan operati trimestrial.xls

Documents

Transcript of Plan operati trimestrial.xls