PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI - core.ac.uk filevi When things go wrong, as they sometimes...
Transcript of PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI - core.ac.uk filevi When things go wrong, as they sometimes...
i
DESIGNING A SET OF INTEGRATED LISTENING AND SPEAKING
MATERIALS BASED ON COLLABORATIVE LEARNING
FOR THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS
OF SMA NEGERI 1 DEPOK
A Thesis
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree
in English Language Education
By
Agustina Budi Pratiwi
Student Number: 041214027
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA
2009
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ii
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
iii
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
iv
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
v
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vi
When things go wrong, as they sometimes will,
When the road you’re trudging seems all up hill,
When the funds are low and the debts are high,
And you want to smile, but you have to sigh,
When care is pressing you down a bit,
Rest, if you must, but don’t you quit
To my family, my beloved, and my friends
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to my Lord, Jesus Christ, for
His blessings and guidance so that I was able to finish my thesis.
Next, I am very grateful to Ag. Hardi Prasetyo, S.Pd., M.A., the head of
English Language Education Study Program for giving me permission to conduct the
study. I would like to address my sincere gratitude to my sponsor, Dr. Retno
Muljani, M.Pd. for her willingness to share her knowledge, give correction, advice,
and support throughout the development of my thesis. In addition, I would like to
thank Mrs. Ndari and Mrs. Marni for willingly spending their time evaluating my
designed materials. I would like to thank Mbak Danik, Mbak Tari, and Mas Andi
for always being pleased to provide any information needed.
I am deeply grateful to all lecturers of the English Language Education Study
Program of Sanata Dharma University for their guidance and knowledge they have
shared for the past four years. I would also like to address my sincere gratitude to the
English teachers of SMAN 1 Depok, Mr. Subiyadi and Mrs. Sri Suryanti, for their
help, advice, guidance, and suggestions to my designed materials.
Furthermore, I would like to express my gratitude to the best people in my
life. I would like to thank my family: my father – Budiyanto, my mother – S.
Rahayu, my sisters and brother, for their great love and prayer. My great
appreciation goes to Agus Ramadhan for his great love and patience in supporting
and encouraging me to accomplish my study and to undergo my life.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
viii
I wish to thank all my classmates: Elisabeth Aditya, Theresia Vina I.,
Agnes Nora E.W., Yosepha Rini, Retno Sukesi, and Agnes Woro Dwi Priharini
for willingly sharing the joy and spirit during my study in this university. In addition,
I warmly thank Ms. Emy, for kindly spending her precious hours proofreading my
thesis.
Lastly, I would like to apologize if I have inadvertently omitted anyone to
whom the appreciation is due.
Agustina Budi Pratiwi
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE………………………………………………………………… i
APPROVAL PAGES……………………………………………………….. ii
STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY…………………………….. iv
DEDICATION PAGE……………………………………………………….. vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………… vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………. ix
LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………… xiii
LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………….. xiv
LIST OF APPENDICES…………………………………………………….. xv
ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………. xvi
ABSTRAK…………………………………………………………………… xvii
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1
A. Research Background…………………………………………………... 1
B. Problem Formulation…………………………………………………… 5
C. Problem Limitation……………………………………………………... 6
D. Research Objectives…………………………………………………….. 6
E. Research Benefits……………………………………………………….. 7
F. Clarification of Terms…………………………………………………… 8
1. Integrated Material …………………………………………………. 8
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
x
2. Listening Skill ……………………………………………………… 9
3. Speaking Skill ……………………………………………………….9
4. Collaborative Learning ……………………………………………. 10
5. The Eleventh Grade Students of Senior High School …………….. 10
CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 12
A. Theoretical Description………………………………………………… 12
1. Listening …………………………………………………………… 13
a. The Nature of Listening ……………………………………… 13
b. Background to Teaching Listening ………………………….. 13
c. Listening Tasks ………………………………………………. 13
2. Speaking …………………………………………………………… 16
a. The Nature of Speaking ………………………………………. 16
b. Background to Teaching Speaking …………………………… 17
3. Integrated Listening and Speaking Materials ……………………… 17
4. Instructional Design Model …………………………………………18
5. Syllabus ……………………………………………......................... 23
6. Material Development……………………………………………… 25
a. Materials Adaptation …………………………………………. 26
b. Techniques for Materials Adaptation ………………………… 26
7. Collaborative Learning ……………………………………………. 27
a. The Nature of Collaborative Learning ……………………….. 27
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xi
b. The Principles of Collaborative Learning ……………………. 28
c. Types of Classroom Activities in Collaborative Learning …… 30
d. Teaching Listening and Speaking Based on CL Approach ….. 32
8. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan for Senior High School ……..33
9. The Characteristics of Senior High School Students ……………… 33
B. Theoretical Framework………………………………………………… 36
CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY 42
A. Research Method………………………………………………………. 42
1. Research and Information Collecting ……………………………. 43
2. Planning ………………………………………………………….. 44
3. Developing Preliminary Form of Product ……………………….. 44
4. Preliminary Field Testing ………………………………………… 45
5. Main Product Revision …………………………………………… 46
B. Research Participants…………………………………………………. 50
C. Research Setting …………………………………………………........ 52
D. Research Instruments ……………………………………………....... 52
1. Interview ……………………………………………………….. 52
2. Questionnaire …………………………………………………… 53
E. Data Collection ………………………………………………………. 55
F. Data Analysis Technique …………………………………………….. 60
G. Research Procedures ………………………………………………… 61
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xii
CHAPTER IV. RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 63
A. The Steps in Designing the Set of Integrated Listening and Speaking
Materials……………………………………………………………….. 63
1. Research and Information Collecting……………………………… 63
2. Planning……………………………………………………………. 70
3. Developing Preliminary Form of Product…………………………. 78
a. Choosing the Subject Contents ………………………………. 78
b. Selecting Teaching-Learning Activities and Instructional
resources ……………………………………………………… 79
c. Designing the Materials ………………………………………. 80
4. Preliminary Field Testing ………………………………………….. 82
a. Expert Validation …………………………………………….. 82
b. Materials Try Out …………………………………………….. 92
5. Changes to Improve the Materials ………………………………… 95
B. Presentation of the Designed Set of the Materials……………………… 96
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 100
A. Conclusions…………………………………………………………….. 100
B. Suggestions……………………………………………………………. 102
REFERENCES………………………………………………………………... 104
APPENDICES ...................................................................................................107
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: Product Specification ……………………………………………… 47
Table 3.2: Data Collection ……………………………………………………. 58
Table 4.1: Summary of Teacher Interviews ………………………………….. 64
Table 4.2: Summary of Students Needs Analysis Questionnaires …………… 68
Table 4.3: Data of Students Questionnaires ………………………………….. 69
Table 4.4: List of Topics ……………………………………………………… 73
Table 4.5: The Specific Learning Objectives of the Designed
Materials…………………………………………………………… 75
Table 4.6: Description of the Respondents…………………………………… 83
Table 4.7: The Results of the Expert Validation Questionnaires …………….. 84
Table 4.8: Students Evaluation Questionnaires……………………………….. 93
Table 4.9: Presentation of the Designed Set of the Materials………………… 97
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiv
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1: Kemp’s Instructional Design Model………………………………. 22
Figure 2.2: Theoretical Framework Chart …………………………………….. 41
Figure 3.1: Relationship of R & D and Kemp’s Instructional Design Steps...... 49
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xv
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Letters of Permission…………………………………………… 107
Appendix 2: Interview Guideline …………………………………………….. 110
Appendix 3: Interview Transcript ……………………………………………. 111
Appendix 4: Needs Survey Questionnaire……………………………………. 113
Appendix 5: Designed Materials Evaluation Questionnaire………………….. 116
Appendix 6: Overview of the Designed Set of the Materials…………………. 127
Appendix 7: Syllabus and Lesson Plans………………………………………. 130
Appendix 8: Presentation of the Designed Set of the Materials ………………. 160
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xvi
ABSTRACT Pratiwi, Agustina Budi Pratiwi. 2009. Designing a Set of Integrated Listening and Speaking Materials Based on Collaborative Learning for the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Depok. Yogyakarta: English Language Education Study Program, Sanata Dharma University. Listening and speaking are important language skills for learners to develop. Unfortunately, the teaching of listening and speaking is still frequently problematic, particularly in SMA Negeri 1 Depok. The limitation of instructional materials and learning media is believed to be one of the obstacles of the implementation of effective listening and speaking teaching-learning activities. Considering that, this study is then aimed at developing a set of integrated listening and speaking materials based on Collaborative Learning for the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Depok. There were two questions formulated in the problem formulation, namely, (1) how is a set of integrated listening and speaking materials based on Collaborative Learning for the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Depok designed? and (2) what does the designed set of the materials look like?. To answer the first question, the writer employed the adaptation of Kemp’s instructional design model as the realization of Educational Research and Development (R & D) method. There were nine instructional design steps employed in this study, namely, (1) enumerating learners’ characteristics, (2) formulating goals and general purposes, (3) formulating topics, (4) specifying learning objectives, (5) listing subject contents, (6) selecting teaching or learning activities and instructional resources, (7) coordinating support services (budget, personnel, and equipment), (8) evaluating the designed set of the materials, and (9) revising the designed set of the materials.
In this study, the data obtained through needs survey served as the basis to develop the materials. Whereas, the data obtained by conducting evaluation and expert validation served as the basis for revisions. The data gathered from conducting evaluation and expert validation showed that the designed set of the materials was well-developed, although some revisions were necessary. Based on the comments and suggestions from the evaluators, the writer improved the materials related to subject contents and learning activities.
The presentation of the final version of the designed set of the materials served as the answer to the second question. The designed set of the materials consists of six units, namely, Environment (unit 1), Education (unit 2), Legend (unit 3), Porquoi Tale (unit 4), Digital Library (unit 5), and Health (unit 6). Each unit consists of ‘Building Knowledge’, ‘Let’s Listen’, ‘Let’s Speak’, and ‘Let’s Wrap Up’ sections.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xvii
ABSTRAK Pratiwi, Agustina Budi. 2009. Designing a Set of Integrated Listening and Speaking Materials Based on Collaborative Learning for the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Depok. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Sanata Dharma. Mendengarkan dan berbicara merupakan keterampilan berbahasa yang penting untuk dikembangkan. Namun demikian, pengajaran mendengarkan dan berbicara masih sering menjumpai banyak kendala, khususnya seperti yang terjadi di SMA Negeri 1 Depok. Sangat terbatasnya materi pembelajaran listening dan speaking serta kurangnya media pembelajaran diyakini sebagai salah satu penghambat penerapan kegiatan pembelajaran mendengarkan dan berbicara yang efektif bagi para siswa di sekolah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan seperangkat materi mendengarkan dan berbicara berdasarkan Collaborative Learning untuk kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Depok. Dalam penelitian ini, terdapat dua pertanyaan dalam perumusan masalah yaitu (1) bagaimanakah seperangkat materi mendengarkan dan berbicara berdasarkan Collaborative Learning untuk siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Depok dirancang? dan (2) bagaimanakah penyajian materi mendengarkan dan berbicara yang telah disusun tersebut?. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan yang pertama dalam perumusan masalah, penulis mengadaptasi model perancangan instruksional yang dikembangkan oleh Kemp sebagai realisasi metode Educational Research and Development (R & D). Terdapat sembilan langkah perancangan instruksional dalam penelitian ini. Langkah-langkah tersebut adalah (1) pengidentifikasian karakteristik siswa, (2) perumusan tujuan dan tujuan umum, (3) perumusan topik, (4) perumusan tujuan khusus, (5) perincian isi materi, (6) pemilihan dan pengembangan kegiatan pembelajaran (pengembangan materi pembelajaran), (7)pengkoordinasian peralatan pendukung (anggaran dan perlengkapan), (8) pengevaluasian materi, dan (9) perevisian/perbaikan materi. Dalam penelitian ini, data yang diperoleh melalui survei analisa kebutuhan siswa digunakan sebagai dasar pengembangan Sedangkan, data yang diperoleh dari evaluasi kemudian digunakan sebagai acuan untuk revisi. Data yang diperoleh dari melaksanakan evaluasi dan validasi ahli menunjukkan bahwa seperangkat materi telah dikembangkan dengan baik, meskipun masih diperlukan beberapa revisi. Berdasarkan saran yang diperoleh dari penilai, penulis memperbaiki materi yang berkaitan dengan isi materi dan aktivitas pembelajaran.
Untuk menjawab pertanyaan yang kedua, penulis menyajikan hasil akhir dari materi yang dirancang. Materi tersebut terdiri dari 6 unit yaitu Environment (unit 1), Education (unit 2), Legend (unit 3), Pourquoi tale (unit 4), Digital Library (unit 5), and Health (unit 6). Masing-masing unit terdiri bagian utama yaitu: ‘Building Knowledge’, ‘Let’s Listen’, ‘Let’s Speak’, dan ‘Let’s Wrap Up’.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the introduction of this study which can be elaborated
into six main parts. They are the research background, problem formulation, problem
limitation, research objectives, research benefits, and clarification of terms.
A. Research Background
English now becomes an essential school subject to learn since it is an
international language which is widely used in the world. Strevens (1980: 61) states
that “English language is vastly more used nowadays than it was in the past, and that
the expansion of its use continuous rapidly.” The fact shows that English is now
broadly used in many fields like education, economics, culture, and so on. In
addition, according to Harmer (1991:1), English has become a lingua franca, which
is widely accepted as a means of communication between speakers who have
different native languages. He adds that English is one of the main languages of
international communication (Harmer, 1991: 1). It is clear that English is mostly used
by people from various countries for communication. Considering the importance of
English, people are required to learn and master English whether it is as their second
language or as foreign language.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2
Research and practice in English language teaching as cited by Brown (2001:
232) has identified the four skills in language teaching, namely, listening, speaking,
reading, and writing as of paramount importance. This statement implies that in
language teaching, teachers shall teach those language skills as interrelated skills
instead of focusing only on teaching one of those skills as separated skills. Hence,
there are interconnection among learning activities from each of the language skill
teaching.
In this study, the writer is challenged to design a set of integrated materials
that can facilitate the students in mastering English skills. The writer focuses her
study on designing a set of integrated listening and speaking materials for senior high
school. She integrates listening and speaking skills since they are closely intertwined
(Brown, 2001: 267). Listening and speaking are interrelated skills that can be
conducted simultaneously in oral communication and can be taught all together as
well. In addition, listening activities mostly have speaking as the follow-up activities.
The writer focuses her study on designing a set of integrated listening and
speaking materials by considering two standard competences stated in Kurikulum
Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) for senior high school level and the goal of
teaching English in senior high school. The two standard competences in KTSP
require students to understand meaning and to express meaning both in formal
transactional and interpersonal conversation and sustained in daily life contexts
(Depdiknas, 2006: 315 – 316). In addition, the goal of teaching English in senior high
school is to assist the students to acquire both functional and informational literacy
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
3
level (Depdiknas, 2006: 307). The achievement of informational literacy level means
that the students are expected to be able to access knowledge with their ability to use
the language. Hence, the target of learning English in senior high school is to help the
students achieve their ability to use English for communication and access knowledge
since they are prepared to continue their study in higher levels (Depdiknas, 2006:
307).
In addition, the writer considers some common problems which are
experienced by students when they are learning listening and speaking skills such as
lack of self confidence, disability to make sentences, fear of making mistakes, and
lack of vocabulary mastery. Based on informal observations conducted by the writer
while conducting teaching practice in senior high school, it seemed that students
could not speak English well and found many difficulties in responding to meanings
in transactional and interpersonal conversations. Therefore, the writer considers that it
is necessary to find solutions in order to solve those problems.
Considering the common problems experienced by students when they are
learning listening and speaking skills, the writer implements various listening and
speaking activities based on Collaborative Learning principles. In order to solve
students’ problems in learning listening and speaking skills, the writer adapts several
learning activities based on Collaborative Learning principles that enable the students
to get involved in groups to share their ideas, as well as listen to their partners, and
give responses to their partners’ ideas. Most of Collaborative Learning activities are
in the form of study teams and group discussion. Through study teams and group
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4
discussion the students can learn from each other to find out the meaning of new
vocabulary items and learn how to make sentences. They also have to be responsible
to encourage each other to speak actively after listening to their members’ opinions.
By learning in small groups or teams, the students will be accustomed to do
conversations so that they will be more confident in uttering ideas and listening to
their partners as well as giving responses to them.
The writer designs the materials based on the Collaborative Learning
approach by referring to the principles of teaching-learning activities based on
Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). One of those principles states that the
teaching-learning activities should provide the students with the opportunity to learn
individually. At the same time, the learning activities should also provide the students
with several assignments which encourage them to work in groups so that they can
enhance their solidarity, sympathy, and empathy towards others (KTSP, 2006: 51).
Based on this principle, the writer considers that Collaborative Learning can be a
suitable approach to conduct teaching-learning activities based on the Kurikulum
Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) since Cooperative or Collaborative Learning
essentially involves students learning from each other in groups (Larsen-Freeman,
2000: 164). Hence, classroom activities in Collaborative Learning mostly involve the
students to work in groups.
The writer will design the materials by using several learning activities which
are in accordance with the principles of Collaborative Learning that enable the
students to learn within groups like jigsaw activities, information gap, think-pair-
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5
share, and so on. These learning activities facilitate the students in practicing
listening to their group members’ ideas and information. After listening to their group
members’ ideas and information, each student can practice speaking to utter his or her
own information and to give responses to other group members actively using the
target language. The implementation of those learning activities can appropriately
motivate students in achieving the ability to use English in conversation, to access
knowledge, and to overcome their problems in learning listening and speaking skills.
It is because they enable the students to get involved in the learning process by
providing the students with interesting classroom activities.
There were other researchers who designed English materials based on
Collaborative Learning or Cooperative Learning. The designed materials were mostly
intended for specific purposes such as for teaching speaking to street children
(Wulandari, 2005), for tourist Andong drivers (Astuti, 2005), and for the
extracurricular activities in the second year students of senior high school (Rumjati,
2006). The writer will also apply Collaborative Learning approach as the basis to
design a set of integrated listening and speaking materials for the eleventh grade
students of senior high school.
B. Problem Formulation
Based on the discussion in the research background above, the problems of
this research can be formulated on the following page.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6
1. How is a set of integrated listening and speaking materials based on
Collaborative Learning for the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1
Depok designed?
2. What do the integrated listening and speaking materials based on
Collaborative Learning for the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1
Depok look like?
C. Problem Limitation
Referring to the problems formulation, the writer limits the discussion to the
designing integrated listening and speaking materials based on Collaborative
Learning approach for senior high school students. To limit the problem, the writer
will focus only on designing a one - semester - set of integrated listening and
speaking materials based on Collaborative Learning for the eleventh grade students of
SMA Negeri 1 Depok. More specifically, the designed materials are intended for the
Science class at SMA Negeri 1 Depok.
D. Research Objectives
In this part, the writer elaborates the research objectives of this study. The
research objectives of this study are specified as follows:
1. To design a set of integrated listening and speaking materials based on
Collaborative Learning for the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1
Depok.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
7
2. To present the designed set of integrated listening and speaking materials
based on Collaborative Learning for the eleventh grade students of SMA
Negeri 1 Depok.
E. Research Benefits
Hopefully, the result of this study can bring about benefits for many people.
The research benefits are specified as follows:
1. For students
The writer expects that the designed materials will bring about benefits for the
students especially in establishing their ability in interpersonal skill by
conducting Collaborative Learning in listening and speaking activities. In
addition, the writer expects that the designed materials will help the students
improve their listening and speaking abilities through learning activities
which enable them to get involved in each activity so that they can obtain
enjoyment as well.
2. For English teachers
This paper is aimed to provide the teachers with some classroom listening and
speaking activities which apply the principles of Collaborative Learning to
reinforce their students to work together in groups in listening and speaking
class. The writer also expects that the designed materials will assist the
teachers to build students’ ability to speak using the target language and to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
8
learn listening as well. Moreover, the designed materials can also be a model
for the teachers.
3. For other material developers
The writer expects that the result of this paper will bring about benefit for the
other material developers in developing their English materials, particularly
using certain teaching-learning approach and method. In addition, the
writer expects that the other material developers can improve their approaches
and methods in developing the materials.
F. Clarification of Terms
The writer uses some specific terms related to the study. In order to avoid
misinterpretation, there are several terms to define as follows.
1. Integrated Material
In Oxford Advanced Learner’s dictionary (1995: 620), integrated means to be
united into a body or system, where each of the parts in relationship with other.
Materials are the content to be learned in learning process, written in textbooks or
papers. In addition, Richard and Rodgers (1988: 64) state that integrated material is
material that focuses on the mastery of the integrated communicative skills rather
than a mere mastery of the rules in the target language. According to the writer,
integrated materials are defined as a set of learning materials that comprises two
language skills and incorporates the learning topics from each language skill
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
9
including the language elements to facilitate the students in acquiring their language
skills. In this study, integrated listening and speaking materials are a set of materials
comprising both listening and speaking skills, which are incorporated into
interdependence learning activities.
2. Listening Skill
According to Nunan (2003:24), listening is an active, purposeful process of
making sense of what we hear. In addition, Widdowson (1978: 60) states listening is
the receptive counterpart of saying and depends on the visual as well as the aural
medium. In this study, listening is a receptive skill which includes an active process
of receiving new ideas and information with the use of aural and visual media.
Listening is called an active process since the mind actively engages in making
meaning. Therefore, the listeners do not only listen to the listening passages, but they
also interpret the content of those listening passages.
3. Speaking Skill
Speaking is the productive aural or oral skill. It consists of producing
systematic verbal utterances to convey meaning as cited by Nunan (2003:48).
Widdowson (1978:59) adds that speaking as an instance of use, therefore, is part of
reciprocal exchange in which both reception and production play a part. In this study,
speaking is a language skill that incorporates both speech production and speech
interpretation. The act of speaking involves not only the activities of producing
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
10
utterances or statements, but also the activities to listen to other speakers’ utterances.
4. Collaborative Learning
Slavin (1990:2) states “Collaborative Learning refers to a variety of teaching
methods in which students work in small groups to help one another learn academic
content.” Evolving from a humanist view of education propounded by Dewey and
others (Kessler, 1992:129), Collaborative Learning or Cooperative Learning is an
approach to education based on the philosophy that education should be learner
centred and learner directed, that learners can be teachers, and that teachers are guides
and facilitators rather than the source of all knowledge and direction. Hence, the
students are responsible for one another’s learning as well as their own. In this study,
Collaborative Learning is defined as a teaching approach where the learning activities
are conducted by grouping the students of different levels of ability into small teams.
Each team uses a variety of learning activities to learn the academic content and get
better understanding of the subject. In addition, Collaborative Learning enables the
students to learn from each other in groups.
5. The Eleventh Grade Students of Senior High School
The eleventh grade students of senior high school are mostly at the age of
sixteen to seventeen. They are considered as adolescents. According to Hamacheck
(1985:106), adolescence is an intensely social period on the developmental
continuum. Many activities are done in pairs and even more are done in groups. The
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11
participants’ primary motivation is not necessarily to know others, but to know
themselves through feedback from others. In this adolescence period, students have
already attained their background knowledge since their elementary school and junior
high school as the basis for learning in senior high school. In this study, the students
of SMAN 1 Depok grade eleven are the research participants.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
12
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This chapter presents a review of related literature and it is divided into two
parts. They are the theoretical description and theoretical framework. The theoretical
description consists of the discussions of basic theories of listening, speaking,
integrated listening and speaking materials, instructional design model, syllabus,
materials development, Collaborative Learning, Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan
Pendidikan for senior high school, and characteristics of senior high school students.
The theoretical framework discusses the relevant supporting theories in designing the
materials.
A. Theoretical Description
In this part, the writer discusses the basic theories which are applied as the
base line in developing the materials. The writer firstly discusses the theory of
listening and speaking, and integrated listening and speaking materials since she
focuses her study on designing a set of integrated listening and speaking materials.
Subsequently, the writer elaborates the theories of instructional design model,
materials development, Collaborative Learning, Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan
Pendidikan for senior high school, and the characteristics of senior high school
students.
12
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
13
1. Listening
a. The Nature of Listening
As stated by Nunan (2003: 24), “listening is an active, purposeful process of
making sense what we hear.” Listening is a receptive skill since it requires a person to
receive and understand the incoming information.
b. Background to Teaching Listening
According to Nunan (2003: 25), listening was virtually ignored. Subsequently,
direct method promoted the teaching of listening comprehension and the idea that
new teaching points should be introduced orally (Nunan, 2003: 25).
In the years following World War II, the audiolingual method came to
dominate foreign language teaching. This method emphasized memorization of new
structures. The popularity of the audiolingual method paralleled the establishment of
language laboratories for dialogue and pattern practice drills (Nunan, 2003: 25).
Nunan (2003: 25) adds that in the 1970s and early 1980s, the introduction of
communicative language teaching that is the idea the student learns through the act of
communication increased the role of listening. In addition, listening was seen as a
major source of comprehensible input (Nunan, 2003:26).
c. Listening Tasks
According to Goh (2002: 12), there are two kinds of listening tasks. They are
one-way listening tasks and two-way (interactional) tasks. As stated by Goh (2002:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
14
13), one-way listening tasks involve students only in listening and responding
through different ways to achieve outcomes. It is concerned mainly to obtain
information and knowledge. According to Goh (2002: 14), there are ten types of one-
way listening tasks as follows:
1) Restoration
The listening activity includes omitted words or phrases, and deleted extra
information.
2) Reconstruction
This type of listening activity involves creating original message with
words heard or noted down.
3) Comparison
This listening activity includes comparing information of a similar nature for
similarities and differences.
4) Prediction
This listening activity includes extending contents based on clues from
part of the text.
5) Sorting
This listening activity involves sequencing, ranking, and categorizing
items.
6) Elaboration
This listening activity includes elaborating using numbers, words, and
pictures.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
15
7) Evaluation
This listening activity includes identifying inconsistencies and
contradictions, and rank information.
8) Jigsaw
This listening activity includes creating a whole text from different parts.
9) Matching
This listening activity includes matching information from listening to
pictures or written texts.
10) Problem-solving
This listening activity is conducted by offering solution to real-life problems.
In addition, there are five types of two-way (interactional) listening tasks
(Goh, 2002: 21). They are as follows:
1) Creative dictation
This listening activity is conducted by dictating to each other to complete a
text.
2) Description
This listening activity is conducted by sequencing, reproducing, or
completing pictures or diagrams.
3) Simulation
This listening activity is conducted by listening to and expressing opinion in
simulated situations.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
16
4) Discussion
This listening activity is conducted by listening to and expressing opinion on
specified topics.
5) Presentation
This listening activity is conducted by listening and responding to formal and
informal presentations.
2. Speaking
a. The Nature of Speaking
Speaking is the productive aural or oral skill. It consists of producing
systematic verbal utterances to convey meaning as cited by Nunan (2003:48).
According to Davies (1981:145), spoken English is not the same as written English.
Nothing sounds worse than an instructor reading aloud. The way words and sentences
are put together depends upon whether they are going to be read or spoken.
Bailey (1994), as cited by Nunan (2003:48) states that many people feel that
speaking in a new language is harder than reading, writing, or listening for two
reasons. First, unlike reading or writing, speaking happens in real time: usually the
person you are talking to is waiting for you to speak right then. Second, when you
speak, you cannot edit and reverse what you wish to say, as you can if you are
writing. We must make ourselves understood by the people we are speaking with, and
this is not an easy task especially at the beginning and intermediate levels.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
17
b. Background to Teaching Speaking
For many years, people taught speaking by having students repeat sentences
and recite memorized textbook dialogues. Audiolingual repetition drills were
designed to familiarize students with the sounds and structured patterns of the target
language as cited by Nunan (2003:49). During the late twentieth century, language
acquisition research made us reconsider some long-standing beliefs about how people
learn to speak. People do not learn the pieces of the language and then put them
together to make conversations. According to Nunan (2003:50), this realization has
several interesting implications. If we believe that people learn languages by
interacting, then learners should interact during lessons. As a result, a method called
Communicative Language Teaching arose.
3. Integrated Listening and Speaking Materials
According to Widdowson (1978:57), speaking and listening are said to relate
to language expressed through the aural medium. Moreover, an act of communication
through speaking is commonly performed in face to face interaction and occurs as
part of dialogue or other form of verbal exchange, so it is dependent on an
understanding of what else has been said in the interaction (Widdowson, 1978:59).
In other words, it is clear that the act of speaking occurs after listening to the one we
are speaking to. Widdowson (1978:59) adds that “speaking is part of reciprocal
exchange in which both reception and production play a part.” The term reception
here means the act of listening, while production means the act of speaking.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
As stated by Widdowson (1978:60), “listening is the activity of recognizing
what function sentences have in an interaction, what communicative value they take
on as instances of use.” According to Nunan (1989:23), there are two types of
listening, namely, reciprocal listening and non-reciprocal listening.
“Reciprocal listening refers to those listening tasks where there is the opportunity for the listener to interact with the speaker, while non-reciprocal listening refers to tasks such as listening to the radio or a formal lecture where the transfer of information is in one direction only that is from the speaker to the listener.”
The writer, in this study, concerns more on the reciprocal listening in which
the listeners could give responses directly to what they have already listened in the
form of act of speaking.
Hence, the writer aims at designing a set of integrated listening and speaking
materials in order to facilitate the English learners, specifically the senior high school
students in learning the two skills, namely listening and speaking, at one time. The
integrated listening and speaking materials itself means a set of materials which
combines both skills together into interdependence learning activities. In other words,
the learning activities in the materials can enable the students to develop their
listening and speaking skills all together.
4. Instructional Design Model
There are several instructional design models. However, in this study the
writer refers to instructional design model specified by Jerrold E. Kemp. According
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
19
to Kemp (1977:8), the approach and procedures which are called an instructional
design plan can be applied on any educational levels like elementary, secondary, or
college. The plan is designed to supply answers to three questions, which may be
considered the essential elements of instructional technology as follows:
a. What must be learned? (objectives)
b. What procedures and resources will work best to reach the desired learning
levels? (activities and resources)
c. How will we know when the required learning has taken place? (evaluation)
In addition, Kemp (1977:8) states that the plan consists of eight parts as
follows:
a. Consider goals, and then list topics, stating the general purposes for teaching
each topic
According to Kemp (1977: 14), all educational programs are based on
broadly stated goals. Those goals may be derived from society, students, and
subject areas. Material designers consider the goals for teaching each topic in
order to fulfill the society needs and demands.
After considering and establishing the goals, material designers should
list the main topics of learning that will become the scope of the course and
the basis for the instruction. Subsequently, material designers state the general
purposes for teaching each topic as the basis for deciding the learning
objectives.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
20
b. Enumerate the important characteristics of the learners for whom the
instruction is to be designed
Referring to Kemp (1977: 19), material designers must very early
decide the characteristics of their students for themselves such as the
academic factors including number of students, academic background, level of
intelligence, motivation for studying the subject, and so on. Moreover, the
material designers must also consider the social factors including age,
maturity, special talents, relation among students, and so forth.
c. Specify the learning objectives to be achieved in terms of measurable
students’ behavioral outcomes
Material designers shall specify the learning objectives to be achieved
in the form of students’ behavioral outcomes. As stated by Kemp (1977: 23),
learning objectives are what students should know or be able to do, or in what
ways they should behave differently, after studying the topics.
d. Choose the subject contents that support each objective
Material designers choose the subject contents that support each
objective. According to Kemp (1977: 43), a student’s learning experiences
must involve subject contents. The contents, in turn, must closely relate to the
objectives and to the students’ needs. In other words, the subject contents
have a purpose to assist the accomplishment of each learning objective.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21
e. Develop pre-assessments to determine the student’s background and present
level of knowledge about the topic
As stated by Kemp (1977: 51), in order to plan learning activities for
which students are prepared and to ensure that learners do not waste their time
on things they already know, material designers should apply pre-assessment.
The pre-assessment aims at finding out whether the students are prepared to
study the topic and whether they are already competent in some of the stated
objectives (Kemp, 1977: 50).
f. Select teaching or learning activities and instructional resources that will treat
the subject content so students will accomplish the objectives
In addition, material designers also select teaching or learning
activities and instructional resources that can motivate students and effectively
explain and illustrate the subject content (Kemp, 1977: 73).
g. Coordinate such support services as budget, personnel, facilities, equipment,
and schedules to carry out the instructional plan
As stated by Kemp (1977: 85), “support services must be considered at
the same time instructional plans are being made and materials, being
selected”.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
22
h. Evaluate students’ learning in terms of their accomplishment of objectives,
with a view to revising and re-evaluating any phases of the plan that need
improvement
The evaluation is conducted to measure the learning outcomes based
on the learning objectives. Revision is done after getting the evaluation
outcome from the students’ performance. The revision itself is as the feedback
for the designed materials and as the essential thing to improve the designed
materials.
The writer illustrates the plan in Kemp’s model as follows:
Goals, Topics,and General Purposes
Learnercharacteristics
LearningObjectivesRevision
Evaluation
SupportServices
Te a c h in gL e a rn in gA c t iv it ie s
Pre-Assessment
SubjectContent
Figure 2.1.: The Diagram of Kemp’s Model (Kemp, 1977: 9)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
Kemp (1977:9) states that the plan is a flexible process. The instructional
designers have freedom to start with whichever element they are ready to start with
and then move back to the other steps. There is also interdependence among the
elements. Therefore, each element is interrelated one another.
5. Syllabus
Syllabus is a document which says what will (or at least what should) be
learnt (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987: 80). According to Brown (1995: 141-142),
syllabus are concerned with the choices necessary to organize the language content of
a course or program. The procedures involved in developing a syllabus include
examining instructional objectives, arranging instructional objectives in terms of
priorities, and then determining what kinds of techniques and exercises which are
required to accomplish the objectives.
According to Krahnke (1987: 9-11), there are six types of language teaching
syllabus as follows.
a. A structural (formal) syllabus
A structural (formal) syllabus is one of which the content of language
teaching is a collection of the forms and structures, usually grammatical, of the
language being taught such as nouns, verbs, adjectives, and so on.
b. A notional or functional syllabus
A notional (functional) syllabus is one in which the content of the language
teaching is a collection of the functions that are performed when language is used, or
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
24
of the notions that language is used to express. Examples of functions include:
informing, agreeing, apologizing, and so on. Examples of notions include: size, age,
color, and so on.
c. A situational syllabus
A situational syllabus is one in which the content of language teaching is a
collection of real or imaginary situations in which language occurs or is used. A
situation usually involves several participants who are engaged in some activity in a
specific setting. The primary purpose of a situational language teaching syllabus is to
teach the language that occurs in the situations. Examples of situations include:
seeing the dentist, buying a book at the bookstore, and so forth.
d. A skill-based syllabus
A skill – based syllabus is one in which the content of the language teaching
is a collection of specific abilities that may play a part in using language. The primary
purpose of skill-based instruction is to learn the specific language skill. The
secondary purpose is to develop more general competence in the language, learning
only incidentally any information that may be available while applying the language
skills.
e. A task-based syllabus
A task-based syllabus and a content-based syllabus are similar in that in both
the teaching is not organized around linguistic features of the language being learned
but according to some other organizing principles. In the task-based instruction, the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25
content of the teaching is a series of complex and purposeful tasks that the students
want or need to perform with the language they are learning.
f. A content-based syllabus
A content-based syllabus is not really a language teaching syllabus at all. In
the content-based language teaching, the primary purpose of the instruction is to teach
some contents or information using the language that the students are also learning.
6. Materials Development
According to Tomlinson (1998: 2), materials development refers to anything
which is done by writers, teachers or learners to provide sources of language input
and to exploit those sources in ways which maximize the likelihood of intake. Brown
states that “there are three strategies in creating materials including adopting,
developing, and adapting materials (Brown, 1995: 139-140).” Adopting materials
involves deciding on the types of materials that are needed, locating as many different
sets of the material types as possible, evaluating the materials, making use of the
materials, and reviewing the materials on an ongoing basis. Developing materials
includes developing, teaching (field testing), and evaluating the materials. Adapting
materials includes all steps necessary in adopting materials, but must additionally
incorporate phases that allow for analyzing what is worth keeping in the materials,
classifying that remaining materials, filling gaps from other sources, and reorganizing
all of this to fit the program in question.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
a. Materials Adaptation
According to Tomlinson and Masuhara (2004: 11), “materials adaptation
involves changing existing materials so that they become more suitable for specific
learners, teachers or situations.” In addition, they state that in preparation for a
particular lesson, teachers may decide to use only part of a unit, add or delete texts or
activities, and replace or supplement texts or activities with ones from other sources.
b. Techniques for Materials Adaptation
The various techniques for materials adaptation can be divided into three main
categories in terms of quantity, they are Plus (+), Minus (-) or Zero (0) (Tomlinson
and Masuhara, 2004: 15).
In Plus Category, there are two techniques for materials adaptation, they are
addition and expansion. The addition technique means that teachers may add
different texts and/ or activities, whereas in the expansion technique teachers may
expand texts and activities by increasing the length, difficulty, depth, and so on.
In Minus Category, there are three techniques for materials adaptation,
namely, deletion, subtraction, and reduction. In deletion technique, teachers may
delete some texts and/or activities altogether. Subtraction technique means that
teachers may decrease the number of sentences in a text or part of an activity,
whereas reduction technique means that teachers may reduce texts and activities by
decreasing the length, difficulty, depth, and so on.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
The last technique for material adaptation is Zero Category that has five
techniques for materials adaptation. The first technique is modification that is the
teachers may make changes to instructions. The second is replacement that is teachers
may swap one activity with another. The third is reorganization that is teachers may
change the positions of texts and illustrations. The fourth is resequencing that is
teachers may change the sequence of the activities. The fifth is conversion that is
teachers may change the genre of a text or move the content from one medium to
another.
7. Collaborative Learning
In this part, the writer discusses some supporting and essential information
about Collaborative Learning such as the nature of Collaborative Learning, the
principles of Collaborative Learning, types of classroom activities in Collaborative
Learning, and teaching listening and speaking based on Collaborative Learning.
a. The Nature of Collaborative Learning
Slavin (1990:2) states that “Collaborative Learning refers to a variety of
teaching methods in which students work in small groups to help one another learn
academic content.” According to Jacobs as cited by Larsen and Freeman (2000: 164),
in Collaborative Learning teachers teach the students collaborative or social skills so
that they can work together more effectively. In this study, Collaborative Leaning is a
learning strategy that makes the students work together to achieve learning goals. It
essentially involves students learning from each other in groups. The students are
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
responsible for one another’s learning as well as their own. Thus, the success of one
student helps other students to be successful. In the classroom, students are expected
to cooperate with their peers in the learning process. Accordingly, the students are
expected to help each other, to discuss and argue with each other, and to assess each
other’s current knowledge.
In addition, according to Slavin (1990:15), the most important goal of
Collaborative Learning is to provide students with the knowledge, concepts, skills,
and understandings they need to become happy and contributing members of our
society.
b. The Principles of Collaborative Learning
Larsen (1991: 167-168) states that there are some principles in Collaborative
Learning which underlie the implementation of Collaborative Learning classroom as
follows:
1) Language acquisition is facilitated by students interacting in the target
language
In Collaborative Learning classroom, the students are expected to
communicate using the target language whether it is communication between
teachers – students or between students-students. During the learning
activities, the students appear to be busy working in their groups and there is
much talking in the groups to discuss certain topics given by the teacher using
the target language.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
2) The teacher assigns students to the groups so that the groups are mixed-males
and females, different ethnic groups, and different proficiency levels
This allows students to learn from each other and gives them practice
in how to get along with people different from themselves by using the target
language. It enables the students to encourage themselves to cooperate with
others, to solve the problems together in a form of group discussions, and they
will improve themselves by learning from others who have different
proficiency levels.
3) Social skills such as acknowledging another’s contribution, asking others to
contribute, and keeping the conversation calm need to be explicitly taught
Teacher takes an important role to teach explicitly some social skills
such as acknowledging another’s ideas or views, asking others to share their
opinion and argument, and keeping the conversation. Teacher also has to try
to structure the tasks so that each group member can make an equal
contribution and has the same opportunity to converse in order to demonstrate
his or her opinion.
4) Each group member should be encouraged to feel responsible for actively
participating and for learning
Since Collaborative Learning classroom emphasizes on activities
which involves group discussions, each group member should actively
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
participate in the process of problem solving, to share their views, opinion or
argument, and students must have their awareness for actively get involved in
the learning process.
c. Types of Classroom Activities in Collaborative Learning
According to Johnson (2001), many activities can be conducted in
Cooperative Learning or Collaborative Learning as follows:
1) Jigsaw activities
Jigsaw activities usually consist of groups with five students are set
up. Each group member is assigned some unique material to learn and then to
teach to his or her group members. To help in the learning process, students
across the class working on the same sub-section get together to decide what
is important and how to teach it.
2) Think-Pair-Share
Think-Pair-Share usually involves three steps cooperative structure.
During the first step, individuals think silently a question posed by the
instructor. Individuals pair up during the second step and exchange thoughts.
In the third step, the pairs share their responses with other pairs, other teams,
or the entire group.
3) Three-Step-Interview
In this activity, each member of a team chooses another member to be
a partner. During the first step, individuals interview their partners by asking
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
clarifying questions. During the second step, partners reverse the roles. For
the final step, members share their partners’ responses with the team.
4) Team Pair-Solo
In team Pair-Solo, student do problems first as a team, then with a
partner, and finally on their own. It is designed to motivate students to tackle
and succeed at problems which initially are beyond their ability.
5) Information gap
Information gap is a useful activity in which one person has
information that the other lacks. They must use the target language to share
that information.
6) Partners
In this activity, the class is divided into teams of four. Partners move
to one side of the room. Half of each team is given an assignment to master to
be able to teach the other half. Partners work to learn and can consult to other
partners working on the same materials. Teams go back together with each set
of partners teaching the other set.
7) Three - minute review
In three - minute review, teachers stop any time during a lecture or
discussion and give teams three minutes to review what has been said, ask
clarifying questions or answer questions.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
32
d. Teaching Listening and Speaking Based on the Collaborative Learning
Approach
As the principles of Cooperative Learning (Collaborative Learning), teaching
listening and speaking are conducted by assigning the students to work in groups to
converse and share their opinions and arguments toward particular topics given.
Therefore, the teacher can make use of study teams in which the students are given a
case or assignments that must be completed within group discussion. During the
process of problem solving, students must communicate with others by using the
target language. They have to encourage each member to actively participate in
discussing some cases, to have courage to speak, to share their opinion, and to learn
from other who have different level of proficiency.
In this study, the writer adopts several types of classroom activities in
Collaborative Learning which involves the learning activities in the form of study
teams. The classroom activities are jigsaw activities, information gap, think-pair-
share, three-step-interview, partners, three-minute review, discussions, and
presentations (Johnson, 2001). These kinds of classroom activities can facilitate the
students in learning listening and speaking skills since they reinforce the students to
be actively participated in listening as well as responding to other students’ ideas and
information.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
33
8. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan for Senior High School
Based on Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, the goal of teaching English
for senior high school is to assist the learners acquire both functional and
informational abilities since they are prepared to continue their study in University
(KTSP, 2006: 307). The English lesson is then aimed at developing the learners’
competence in communicating both in spoken and written forms to achieve
informational literacy level. Thus, the important goal of teaching English in senior
high school is not merely to assist the students to use English in daily communication
both in spoken and written forms, but it also provides the learners with the ability to
access knowledge by using the language.
9. The Characteristics of Senior High School Students
In designing the materials, the writer considers also the characteristic of senior
high school students. The eleventh grade students of senior high school are mostly at
the age of sixteen to seventeen. They are considered as the adolescents. According to
Hamacheck (1985: 106), adolescence is an intensely social period on the
developmental continuum. Many activities are done in pairs and even more are done
in groups. The participants’ primary motivation is not necessarily to know others, but
to know themselves through feedback from others. For that reason, the teacher must
apply the learning activities that lead the students to develop their ability in working
in pairs and groups in order that they can learn from each other, and get the feedback
as well.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
34
More specifically, the writer identifies the students’ level of socio and
cognitive development so that the designed materials are appropriate to their basic
characteristic particularly to their socio and cognitive development.
To identify the students’ level of socio and cognitive development, the writer
refers to the theory of adolescents’ basic characteristics stated by Hamacheck (1985:
105) in which it covers physical development, social development, emotional
development, and cognitive development. In this study, the writer only refers to two
of those four basic characteristics during adolescence period that relates directly to
the approach of the designed materials. The two factors are social and cognitive
development. The explanations about those two factors are stated as follows.
1) Social development
In his book entitled Psychology in Teaching, Learning, and Growth,
Hamacheck states that peer group relationships become increasingly
important during the junior high and high school years. In the senior high
school level, in particular, students are expected to work in groups and pairs
to share their views and opinions, to exchange thoughts, and to respond to
others’ opinions. They have already been able to think more abstractly.
According to Hamacheck (1985: 106-107), there are at least six
important functions that are most directly associated with peer group
involvement. First, to some extent, the peer group takes place of the family.
Second, peer group membership is a useful stabilizer during a period of rapid
transition. Third, the peer group can be an important source of self-esteem in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
35
the sense of being important to someone outside the primary family unit.
Fourth, the peer group insulates and protects adolescent to some extent from
the coercions that adults are likely to impose on young people. Fifth, the peer
group provides an opportunity to practice by doing. The last one is that the
peer group offers a psychosocial model that many parents simply cannot
provide.
2) Cognitive development
According to Piaget as cited by Hamacheck (1985: 114), in the lengthy
and impressive research of the late Swiss biologist-psychologist, adolescents
at about eleven or twelve years old alter their way of thinking from the
concrete, specific, black-and-white thinking of the preadolescent years into
the more mature abstract reasoning skills associated with adult problem
solving.
The ability to conceive of “what might be” is an essential
characteristic of the formal operational thought processes that emerge in
adolescences. Formal operational adolescents are more able of thinking not
only about the reality they can see, but also about the reality they can imagine
if circumstances were changed. This frequently leads to a fair amount of
idealistic thoughts, so characteristics of adolescent as a group. Adolescents
like to think about things, to imagine beyond the moment.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
36
Adolescent egocentrism sometimes takes the form of zealous idealism
(Hamacheck, 1985: 115). In their thinking about the world and a perfect
society, adolescents may arrive at what they see as ultimate solutions to
inequality and social injustice. It means that sometimes they frustrate when
they find that not everyone shares their view of the same perfect reality.
B. Theoretical Framework
In order to design the materials, the writer adapts the instructional design
model promoted by Kemp (1977). In addition, some theories related to listening and
speaking (Nunan, 2003), integrated listening and speaking materials (Widdowson,
1978), syllabus (Brown, 1995 and Hutchinson & Waters, 1987), materials
development (Tomlinson, 1998), Collaborative Learning (Slavin, 1990 and Larsen &
Freeman, 2000), Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP: 2007), and
characteristics of senior high school students (Hamacheck, 1985) are used in the
model. The elaboration of each step in the model is presented as follows.
1) Enumerating the important characteristics of the learners for whom the
instruction is to be designed
The writer considers the learners’ characteristics which include two
major characteristics as the basis for constructing the materials. The first
major characteristics include some academic factors like students’ academic
background and level of intelligence. The second major characteristics are the
social factors such as age and relation among students. The writer finds out
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
the learners’ characteristics by interviewing the English teachers of SMAN 1
Depok and conducts needs analysis by distributing questionnaires to one
Science class grade eleven of SMAN 1 Depok. In addition, she also conducts
library study by reading some sources such as books or articles which provide
the explanation about senior high school students’ characteristics. The needs
analysis and library study are conducted in order that the designed materials
will be suitable for the students and appropriate to their needs.
2) Formulating goals, general purposes, and topics
After gathering the information about the learners’ characteristics, the
writer decides the goals of teaching and learning based on the society’s and
students’ needs, and the subject areas. The goals were adapted from the
regulation of Education Minister of Indonesia No. 22/ 2006 (Depdiknas, 2006:
307). In addition, the writer formulated the general purposes by considering
the standard competences in KTSP. Subsequently, the writer listed some
learning topics by distributing questionnaires to one science class grade
eleven of SMAN 1 Depok and referring to the curriculum.
3) Specifying learning objectives to be achieved in terms of measurable students’
behavioral outcomes
The next step is specifying the learning objectives as the base line for
the writer to measure students’ behavioral outcomes. In this study, the writer
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
38
determines the learning objectives after deciding the learning goals and the
general purposes.
The writer categorized the learning objectives into general learning
objectives and specific learning objectives. The general objectives were the
objectives that were not measurable. Whereas, the specific objectives were the
objectives that were measurable, as stated by Kemp (1977: 24) that objectives
should be measurable.
4) Choosing the subject contents that support each objective
The writer lists and selects the subject contents (materials selection)
and then develops the materials by referring to the topics chosen after
gathering the data from the respondents. This materials selection aims at
providing learning experiences in order to achieve the learning objectives.
In this step, the writer develops syllabus and lesson plans, chooses
some learning activities, and selects some exercises which support each
objective. The writer uses functional syllabus since the purpose of this study
is to design a set of materials which emphasizes on communicative function
which integrates both listening and speaking skills. Hence, the designed
materials focus on teaching language functions which are performed when
language is used, and they are integrated with some genres based on the
KTSP.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
The writer adapts some techniques for materials development.
Specifically, the writer makes use of the Plus Category; they are addition
technique and expansion technique, and Zero Category which includes
modification technique (Tomlinson & Masuhara, 2004: 15).
In addition, the writer conducts two stages in developing the materials;
they are preparing for materials development which includes text collection
and text selection, and developing the materials. In the first stage, the writer
collects the listening and speaking texts from several English textbooks and
international networks as the teaching-learning materials. Then, the writer
selects those texts which are relevant to the learning topics to be applied for
teaching-learning activities based on Collaborative Learning.
In the second stage, the writer reads and listens to the texts in order to
re-engage with the text. After that, the writer gives the students an instruction
to articulate their views, to share their knowledge, and to think of connections
about the topics discussed in the designed materials.
5) Selecting teaching or learning activities and instructional resources that will
treat the subject contents so students will accomplish the objectives
In this step, the writer determines the most effective teaching or
learning activities and instructional resources. The writer applies several
learning activities based on the Collaborative Learning principles like jigsaw
activities, information gap, think-pair-share, team pair-solo, three minute
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
review, partners, and three-step-interview to facilitate the achievement of the
learning objectives. The instructional resources include printed integrated
listening and speaking materials using Collaborative Learning, tape recorder
or audiovisual media, and other items for individual learning and group
discussions.
6) Coordinating such support services as budget, personnel, facilities, equipment,
and schedules to carry out the instructional plan
In this study, the writer considers also the support services like
facilities such as language laboratory and the teaching media, and the
teaching-learning equipment. She arranges a schedule in the form of syllabus
of the implementation of the materials that shows the order of time when to
use the materials.
7) Evaluating students’ learning in terms of their accomplishment of objectives,
with a view to revise and re-evaluate any phases of the plan that need
improvement
This step aims to improve the designed materials by revising any
phases of the plan that need improvement. It implies that revisions can be
implemented in any previous steps. However, the results of expert validation
and materials try-out will provide feedback for necessary revisions. The writer
carries out the evaluation by distributing questionnaires to some English
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
teachers in SMAN 1 Depok and some English lecturers at Sanata Dharma
University.
The writer’s theoretical framework steps figure is presented as follows.
Figure 2.2: The Writer’s Theoretical Framework Chart
Theoretical Framework
Enumerating learner characteristics
Formulating goals, general purposes, and topics
Specifying learning objectives
Choosing appropriate subject contents
Selecting teaching or learning activities and instructional resources
Coordinating support services
Evaluating designed materials
Revising designed materials
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
This chapter elaborates the methodology which was applied by the writer in
this research. It included the research method, research participants, research setting,
research instruments, data collection, data analysis technique, and research
procedures.
A. Research Method
The writer applied research and development (R & D) method for designing
the materials. According to Borg and Gall (1998:772), “educational research and
development (R & D) is a process used to develop and validate educational products
such as material objects including textbooks and methods for teaching-learning
process.” The writer applied the educational research and development (R&D)
method since this research attempted to develop a set of materials for senior high
school students and the theoretical steps in designing materials as described in
Chapter II matched the steps in R & D study.
This research and development study consists of a cycle covering ten steps for
designing the set of integrated listening and speaking materials. Those steps are
research and information collecting, planning, developing preliminary form of
product, preliminary field testing, main product revision, main field testing,
42
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
operational product revision, operational field testing, final product revision,
dissemination, and implementation (Borg and Gall, 1998: 772).
Nevertheless, this research did not use all of the steps as described by Borg
and Gall (1998: 772). Because of the limitation of time, this study only applied step
one to five. The steps were research and information collecting, planning, developing
preliminary form of product, preliminary field testing, and main product revision. The
writer classified the research and information collecting, and planning steps into pre-
designing processes. The step on developing preliminary form of product was
classified into designing process. Whereas, the preliminary field testing and main
product revision steps were classified into post-designing processes.
1. Research and Information Collecting
This research and information collecting step was classified into the pre-
designing process. The writer conducted two steps in this research and information
collecting stage. The first step was review of literature. The review of literature was
intended to gather the underlying theories which supported the study in relation to
Collaborative Learning, nature of integrated materials, instruction design models,
materials development, nature of listening and speaking, and KTSP.
The second step was learners’ needs analysis. The learners’ needs analysis
was intended to gather information about senior high school students’ characteristics,
learning topics that students liked most, and kinds of learning materials the students
needed and expected. This research and information collecting was conducted by
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
44
interviewing the English teacher of SMAN 1 Depok grade eleven and distributing
questionnaires to the eleventh grade students of Science class of SMAN 1 Depok.
This research and information collecting step was intended to carry out the
first stage in designing materials adapted from Kemp’s model, namely, enumerating
learners’ characteristics and needs.
2. Planning
In this step, the writer formulated goals and general purposes, decided topics,
and specified learning objectives based on KTSP. This planning step as the pre-
designing process was intended to carry out the second and the third steps of the
adapted Kemp’s model, namely, formulating goals, topics, and general purposes, and
specifying the learning objectives.
3. Developing preliminary form of product
Developing preliminary form of product functioned as the designing process.
In this step, the writer began developing the materials based on the data gathered in
the research and information collecting step. The writer listed and chose the subject
contents, selected the teaching - learning activities, instructional resources, then
designed the materials.
The writer applied the Plus Category of materials adaptation included addition
and expansion techniques (Tomlinson and Masuhara, 2004: 15) by adding different
listening passages to expand listening and speaking activities. The writer also applied
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
45
the Zero Category, specifically modification technique by changing the instructions
and layout of the materials.
The writer also considered some support services such as equipments and
facilities in selecting the learning activities. The developing preliminary form of
product step was in accordance with steps four, five, and six adapted from Kemp’s
model, namely, choosing appropriate subject contents, selecting teaching- learning
activities and instructional resources, and coordinating support services (facilities,
equipments, and so on).
4. Preliminary Field Testing
The preliminary field testing step was combined with evaluating the designed
materials as stated in step seven of the adapted Kemp’s model.
In this step, the writer also conducted other step in research and development
study, namely, expert validation. This step was based on the result of a seminar on
development research methodology held by the National Education Department in
2008. The term validation was defined as an effort to make the designed materials
accepted to apply in the teaching-learning process. This expert validation process was
intended to gain some feedback and evaluation from people who were considered as
the experts in designing materials.
In this study, the expert validation process was conducted by interviewing
some English teachers of SMAN 1 Depok and English Language Education Study
Program lecturers of Sanata Dharma University. The writer also distributed
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
46
questionnaires to the eleventh grade students of Science class at SMAN 1 Depok to
gain feedback for the designed materials.
5. Main Product Revision
This step functioned as the post-designing process. In this step, the writer
revised and improved the designed materials based on the evaluation and feedback
gained in the previous step. This step was in accordance with step eight of the
adapted Kemp’s model, namely, revising the designed materials.
After gaining some feedback and evaluation from the experts, the writer then
specified the products (the designed materials), which was called product
specification process. This process was intended to elaborate the specific
characteristics of the designed set of materials. The writer presented the product
specification on the next page.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
47
Table 3.1 Product Specification
Aspects Specifications
Name A Set of Integrated Listening and Speaking Materials Based
on Collaborative Learning for the Eleventh Grade Students
of SMA Negeri 1 Depok
Purpose To present the designed set of integrated listening and
speaking materials based on Collaborative Learning for the
purpose of assisting the eleventh grade students of SMA
Negeri 1 Depok in learning listening and speaking skills
User The eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Depok for
intracurricular activity
Teaching/ learning
approach
Collaborative Learning
Syllabus type Functional syllabus
Curriculum source Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) 2006
Materials Integrated listening and speaking materials
Time allotment 6 (six) units in 16 (sixteen) x 45’ total meetings
Type of product
Recorded short stories, recorded analytical exposition texts,
news, videos on environmental cases, and printed materials
(handouts)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
48
Aspects Specifications
The use of materials Supplementary materials used in class with teacher’s guide
Activities Listening to the recording passages, watching videos, think-
pair share, jigsaw activities, prediction tasks, creative
dictation, three-step-interview, matching, finding the
meaning of vocabulary items, filling in the blanks,
answering comprehension questions, simulation task,
discussion, pair works, presentation, and three minutes
review
Evaluation tools Group presentation, simulation task, individual work, pair
work, group work, written assignment, and three-step-
interview
Facilities Language laboratory
Media Computer and speaker
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
49
To summarize all of the five steps of the R&D above, the followings are the
chart of the adopted R&D model.
R & D steps Steps in Kemp’s adopted model
Figure 3.1: The Writer’s R & D Adopted Cycle Elaborated with Kemp’s Adapted Model
Research and information collecting
Enumerating learner characteristics
Planning Formulating goals, general purposes,
and topics
Specifying learning objectives (general objectives and specific objectives)
Developing preliminary form of product
Choosing appropriate subject contents
Preliminary field testing
Main product revision
Evaluating the designed materials
Revising the designed materials
Selecting teaching-learning activities and instructional resources
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
50
B. Research participants
The participants in this study were divided into two groups, the first group
was the participants in the needs analysis or the research and information collecting
step, and the second group was the participants for data collection to evaluate the
designed materials. The research participants could be described as follows.
1. Participants in the needs analysis
a. The Eleventh Grade English Teachers of SMAN 1 Depok
The writer conducted interviews to one English teacher of the eleventh
grade students of SMAN 1 Depok considering that the teacher knew more
about his students’ needs and characteristics. The writer applied a purposive
sampling technique to determine the English teacher of grade eleven to be
interviewed. As stated by Ary, Jacobs, and Razavieh (2002:170), “purposive
sampling has been useful in attitude and opinion surveys”. Therefore,
purposive sampling was considered as a suitable method for gathering
information since the writer aimed at investigating participant’s opinion, and
the English teacher was considered to be the interviewee in the needs analysis.
b. The Students of SMAN 1 Depok Grade Eleven
The writer distributed questionnaires to the eleventh grade students of
Science class of SMAN 1 Depok as the main participants in this study. The
writer gathered information about students’ needs in learning listening and
speaking based on Collaborative Learning activities and the difficulties they
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
51
usually faced in learning listening and speaking skills. The writer applied a
cluster sampling technique because the students were “group of individuals
who were naturally together” (Ary, Jacobs, and Razavieh, 2002:168). The
writer applied the cluster sampling by choosing one Science class grade
eleven consisting of forty students and then distributed the questionnaires
directly to the chosen class.
2. Participants for Evaluating the Designed Materials
a. The English Teachers of SMAN 1 Depok Grade Eleven
The writer distributed questionnaires and conducted interviews to the
English teachers of SMAN 1 Depok in order to collect data for evaluating the
designed materials. They were required to evaluate whether the materials were
suitable for the students.
b. The Lecturers of English Language Education Study Program of Sanata
Dharma University
The writer also needed feedback and evaluation for the designed
materials from the lecturers of English Language Education Study Program of
Sanata Dharma University since they are the experts in English language
teaching. The writer interviewed two lecturers at Sanata Dharma University to
give evaluation and to carry out expert validation process for the designed set
of materials.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
52
c. The Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Depok
The writer distributed questionnaires to the eleventh grade students of
Science class at SMAN 1 Depok in order to gain feedback for the designed
materials. They were required to give their opinion whether the materials were
interesting and whether the level of difficulty of the materials was suitable for
them.
C. Research Setting
This study was conducted in one science class of SMAN 1 Depok grade
eleven. The study was conducted on active days from May 2008 until October 2008.
D. Research Instruments
There were two research instruments used in this study. They were interview
guidelines and questionnaires.
1. Interview
The writer considered interview was a better instrument to obtain deep
answers from the research participants and to obtain clarity of the participants’
answers. Accoding to Ary, Jacob, and Razavieh (2002:146), there are three
broad categories of interviews, namely structured, unstructured, and semi-
structured.
In this study, the writer used unstructured type of interviews to
interview the English teachers of SMAN 1 Depok. The interviews were
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
53
intended to gain participants’ views, opinions, and attitudes about students’
needs and characteristics, students’ difficulties and problems in learning
listening and speaking, difficulties of the materials, and the curriculum for
senior high school grade eleven.
In addition, the writer interviewed the eleventh grade English teachers
of SMAN 1 Depok and English Language Education Study Program lecturers
of Sanata Dharma University to gain some feedback on the designed
materials.
This instrument had three aims. First, it aimed to give much
information and data to conduct research and information collecting and
planning steps in R & D cycle. Second, it aimed to give information and data
to conduct the developing preliminary form of product and preliminary field
testing steps. Third, it aimed to find out the answer of the research problems.
2. Questionnaire
As stated by Ary, Jacob, and Razavieh (2002: 124), “questionnaire is
another type of research instrument which aims at investigating the
participants’ knowledge, opinions, ideas, and experiences.” There are two
types of questionnaires, namely open-ended questionnaires and closed ended
questionnaires. In the open ended questionnaires, the participants are free to
answer the questions in order to give more information. In contrast, in the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
54
closed ended questionnaires, the answers for the questions have been provided
to make it easier for the participants to fill in the questionnaires.
In this study, the two forms of questionnaires were used for different
purposes. The first questionnaires were distributed to the eleventh grade
students of Science class of SMAN 1 Depok to gather some information for
the needs analysis. It consisted of ten closed-ended questions and five open-
ended questions. The closed-ended questions were intended to find out
students’ interest in English, students’ perception on listening and speaking
skills, and students’ opinion on listening and speaking activities in a form of
group works. Whereas, the open-ended questions were intended to ask the
students to choose some topics and learning activities for designing a set of
integrated listening and speaking materials. The writer also asked students’
difficulties in learning listening and speaking skills.
In the preliminary field testing, the writer distributed the second form
of questionnaire to gain evaluation for the designed materials. The evaluation
questionnaires were distributed to two English teachers of SMAN 1 Depok
and two lecturers of English Language Education Study Program of Sanata
Dharma University.
The evaluation questionnaires for the English teachers had ten closed-
ended questions and one open-ended question. These closed-ended questions
were intended to find out some feedback whether the designed materials had
already fulfilled the students’ needs and whether the materials had already
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
55
matched with the goals and objectives as stated in the curriculum. The writer
also wanted to know whether the activities in the designed materials were
interesting and appropriate to the principles of Collaborative Learning,
whether the materials were arranged systematically from simpler to more
complex activities, and whether the difficulty level of the materials was
suitable for the students. The open-ended questions were intended to ask for
some comments and suggestions on the designed materials as the basis to
revise them.
The questionnaires for needs analysis were distributed to gain data to
conduct research and information collecting and planning steps in R & D
cycle and to find out the answer of the first research problem. In addition, the
evaluation questionnaires were distributed to gain data to conduct preliminary
field testing and main product revision steps in R & D cycle and to find out
the answer of the second research problem.
E. Data Collection
The writer conducted three processes of gathering the data. The writer
conducted review of literature, distributed questionnaires, and conducted interviews.
There were two kinds of data obtained in this research; they were from the research
and information collecting, and from preliminary field testing (evaluation).
In the research and information collecting, the writer obtained the data by
conducting review of literature and interviews to English teacher at SMAN 1 Depok
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
56
since June 2008. The writer gained theories and information about Collaborative
Learning, instruction design model, materials development, integrated listening and
speaking, senior high school students’ characteristics, and the newest curriculum for
senior high school from library study.
After gaining the related theories and information, the writer conducted
interviews to English teachers grade eleven of SMAN 1 Depok. Here the writer
gained the information about students’ characteristics, students’ difficulties during
listening and speaking activities, difficulties of the materials, and Kurikulum Tingkat
Satuan Pendidikan.
Subsequently, the writer distributed the questionnaires to the eleventh grade
students of Science class of SMAN 1 Depok. The writer gained the data about
students’ perception and interest in learning speaking and listening, students’
difficulties in learning listening and speaking, topics and kinds of listening and
speaking activities they liked most. The underlying theories from library study and
the information gathered from conducting interviews and distributing questionnaires
were gained to answer the first question stated in the problem formulation and used as
the basis for the writer in designing the materials.
In the preliminary field testing instruments, the writer gained the feedback and
evaluation on the designed materials from the English teachers of SMAN 1 Depok,
English Language Education Study Program lecturers of Sanata Dharma University,
and the eleventh grade students of Science class of SMAN 1 Depok. The writer
gained some comments and suggestions on the designed materials. The writer then
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
57
improved and revised the designed materials based on the comments, feedback, and
suggestions she obtained.
The data from the research and information collecting were gained in the first
semester, which was in July 2008. In addition, the data from preliminary field testing
were gathered after the designed materials were completed, which was in October
2008. The writer presents the table of the data collection on the following page.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
58
Table 3.2 The Writer’s Data Collection
Instruments Participants Time Data Obtained Research
Problem Needs survey
Unstructured
Interview
The eleventh grade
English teacher of
SMAN 1 Depok
May 2008, before
designing the
materials
Students’ needs and characteristics,
students’ difficulties and problems in
learning listening and speaking,
difficulties of listening and speaking
materials, and current curriculum for
senior high school grade eleven
Research
problem
number one
Needs analysis:
a. Closed-ended
questionnaire
The eleventh grade
students of Science 1
class of SMAN 1
Depok
May 2008, before
designing the
materials
Students’ interest in English, students’
perception on listening and speaking
skills, and students’ opinion on listening
and speaking activities in a form of
group works
Research
problem
number one
b. Open-ended
questionnaire
Topics and learning activities for
designing a set of listening and speaking
materials, students’ difficulties in
learning listening and speaking skills
Research
problem
number one
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
59
Instruments Participants Time Data Obtained Research
Problem
Evaluation:
Unstructured
interview
The eleventh grade
English teacher of
SMAN 1 Depok and
lecturers of English
Education Study
Program of Sanata
Dharma University
October 2008,
after designing
the materials
Teachers’ and lecturers’ comments and
suggestions toward the designed
materials.
Research
problem
number two
Evaluation
questionnaire
The eleventh grade
English teachers of
SMAN 1 Depok
October 2008,
after designing
the materials
Teachers’ comments, feedback, and
suggestions toward the designed
materials
Research
problem
number two
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
60
F. Data Analysis Technique
There were two sources of data in this study. The first data were obtained
through research and information collecting step. The writer distributed
questionnaires and conducted interviews for this research and collecting step. The
data from the interviews were analyzed from the field note and used as the basis in
designing the materials. Subsequently, the data of closed-ended questionnaires for
needs analysis and for the evaluation were analyzed in the form of percentage. As
stated by Ary, Jacob, and Razavieh (2002: 125), “percentages are calculated by
dividing the total number in one category by the total number in all categories and
multiplying the result by 100.” The writer made use of percentage since the
participants in this study only consisted of one class of senior high school students
and two English teachers of grade eleven. The data of closed ended questionnaires for
the needs analysis were calculated as follows:
n x 100%
∑ n
Notes:
n = the total number of respondents choosing certain category (item)
∑ n= the total number of respondents
After analyzing the data from interviews and questionnaires, the writer could
determine some topics and teaching-learning activities or exercises which were
appropriate for the students.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
61
After the materials design was completed, the writer distributed the
questionnaires for evaluating the designed materials. The writer used closed- ended
and open-ended questionnaires. In closed - ended questionnaires, the respondents
were asked to give points of agreement on the statements which represented their
opinions on the appropriateness of the designed materials. The data were analyzed by
finding out the percentage. The data of closed-ended questionnaires for the evaluation
were calculated as follows:
n x 100%
∑ n
Notes:
n = the total number of respondents choosing certain category (item)
∑ n= the total number of respondents
In the open ended questionnaires, the respondents had to write down their
opinions and suggestions concerning the designed materials. The gathered data were
used as the basis for the writer to revise and improve the designed materials.
G. Research Procedures
This research was conducted through the following steps:
1. Preparation
Before conducting the research, the writer prepared everything needed in the
research as elaborated on the following page.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
62
a. Gathering some theories to support the study. The theories were about
listening, speaking, Collaborative Learning, instructional design models,
materials development, characteristics of senior high school students grade
eleven, and KTSP.
b. Asking permission from the Head of English Education Study Program of
Sanata Dharma University including finding out some letters of permission.
c. Asking permission from the headmaster of SMAN 1 Depok and finding out
some letters of permission.
2. Conducting Needs Analysis
There were some steps which were conducted by the writer as follows:
a. Interviewing the teacher
b. Distributing the questionnaire to the students
3. Developing syllabus for materials design
4. Designing the materials based on the needs analysis
5. Obtaining some feedback and evaluation by distributing the questionnaires to the
English teachers of SMAN 1 Depok, the eleventh grade students of science
department, and the lecturers of English Education Study Program at Sanata
Dharma University.
6. Revising and improving the materials based on the evaluation obtained from both
the English teachers at SMAN 1 Depok and the lecturers of English Education
Study Program at Sanata Dharma University.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
63
CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter presents the results and discussions related to the study. There
are two parts discussed in this chapter. The first part elaborates the results and
discussions on the steps of designing the materials. This part is intended to answer the
first question stated in the problem formulation, namely, how a set of integrated
listening and speaking materials based on Collaborative Learning for SMAN 1 Depok
is designed. The second part is intended to present the designed set of materials. This
part aims to answer the second question stated in the problem formulation, namely,
what the designed set of integrated listening and speaking materials based on
Collaborative Learning for the eleventh grade students of SMAN 1 Depok looks like.
A. The Steps of Designing the Set of Integrated Listening and Speaking
Materials Based on Collaborative Learning for the Eleventh Grade Students
of SMAN 1 Depok
This part elaborates the R & D steps which were combined with the steps for
designing a set of materials adapted from Kemp’s model. Five steps were undertaken
to design the materials. The steps are as follows.
1. Conducting research and information collecting
The writer gathered data for the research and information collecting by
conducting review of literature, interviewing, and distributing questionnaires. The
63
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
64
review of literature was conducted through library study. In this step, the writer
studied the current curriculum for senior high school grade eleven (KTSP) and other
theories related to the study as stated in Chapter II.
Having conducted the review of literature, the writer interviewed the eleventh
grade English teacher of SMAN 1 Depok. The interview was conducted on 14 July
2008. The writer made use of unstructured interviews. The results of the interviews
are presented as follows.
Table 4.1: Summary of Teacher Interviews
No Statements Results
1. Students’ involvement
in learning listening
and speaking skills
Most of the students participated actively in the
process of learning listening and speaking skills.
They were interested in learning listening and
speaking. Besides, they were quite cooperative to do
the activities in class.
2. Students’ experiences
in learning listening
skill
The students experienced some listening activities
through watching movies and listening to the
passages. Subsequently, they analyzed the genre of
the listening passages including the generic
structure, the moral value, and the main idea of the
listening passage.
3.
Students’ experiences
in learning speaking
skill
The students experienced speaking activities through
story telling, presentation, role play, and group
discussion.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
65
No Statements Results
4. Students’ difficulties in
learning listening
1. The speakers spoke so fast that the students
could not comprehend the materials well.
2. The students often found difficulties in
understanding the native – like
pronunciation.
5. Students’ difficulties in
learning speaking
The students sometimes felt unconfident to speak in
English because of their lack of vocabulary items.
6. Learning materials
applied by the English
teacher to teach
listening and speaking
skills
The teacher mostly applied learning materials taken
from international network and English textbooks.
7. Teaching media used
by the English teacher
to teach listening and
speaking skills
The teacher used handouts, English textbooks,
computer, headsets, and speakers.
8. Teacher’s opinion on
the use of Collaborative
Learning approach for
conducting listening
and speaking activities
The teacher thought that Collaborative Learning
approach could be applied for teaching listening and
speaking skills to enable the students to participate
actively in the learning process.
From the results of interviewing the English teacher, the writer discovered
that basically, the students participated actively in the English learning process. The
students were interested in learning listening and speaking skills. They were quite
cooperative in the learning process. Nevertheless, sometimes the students felt
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
66
frustrated to listen to some listening passages since the speakers spoke so fast. They
sometimes did not understand the native - like pronunciation.
The English teacher mostly applied listening activities like watching movies
and listening to the recording passages. Additionally, the teacher mostly applied
speaking activities in the form of story telling, presentation, and group discussion.
All of the learning materials were usually related to daily life contexts. The
learning materials were adapted from some international networks and English
textbooks.
From the interview, the writer considered some points in designing the
materials as follows:
1. The listening and speaking topics and materials should be related to daily life
contexts.
2. The listening and speaking activities should reflect the principles of
Collaborative Learning.
3. The listening and speaking materials should be in accordance with the genres
of the texts taught for the eleventh grade students of senior high school.
4. The writer should provide the students with various learning activities and
exercises.
5. The writer should arrange the learning activities and exercises from simple
activities to the more complex ones.
6. The lesson should include three stages, namely, pre-activities, main activities,
and post activities.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
67
After interviewing the English teacher of grade eleven, the writer then
distributed close-ended and open-ended questionnaires to the eleventh grade students
of SMA Negeri 1 Depok. The questionnaires were distributed to forty students in one
science class grade eleven. The questionnaires were distributed on 28 July 2008. The
writer presents the result of the data as follows.
Table 4.2: Summary of Students Needs analysis Questionnaires
No Statements Strongly
disagree
Disagree Agree Strongly
agree
1. The students participated
actively in Learning English
0 %
47,5%
47,5%
5 %
2. Listening and speaking skills
attracted students’ motivation.
0%
32,5%
55%
12,5%
3. The students enjoyed and
participated actively in learning
listening and speaking skills.
0%
55%
40%
5%
4. Listening and speaking
materials enabled the students
to get involved in each learning
activity.
0%
40%
40%
20%
5. The students often found
difficulties to learn listening and
speaking.
0% 10%
55%
35%
6. The students would tend to be
passive because of the difficulty
in leaning listening and
speaking.
2,5%
35% 50%
12,5%
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
68
No Statements Strongly
disagree
Disagree Agree Strongly
agree
7. The students consulted their
teacher and friends when they
found difficulties in learning
listening and speaking.
0%
10%
65%
25%
8. The students preferred listening
and speaking activities in form
of group works.
5%
17,5%
55%
22,5%
9. The students could develop
their ability in listening and
speaking skills through learning
activities in form of group
works.
5%
22,5%
55%
17,5%
10. The students preferred learning
activities like games, role play,
and discussion.
2,5% 5% 57,5% 35%
The data showed that many students were motivated to learn listening and
speaking skills. Nevertheless, many students were passive when they found
difficulties in learning listening and speaking skills. Most students stated that they
would consult their English teacher and friends when they found difficulties in
learning listening and speaking skills.
Additionally, most students preferred learning activities in form of group
works like games, role play, and discussion since they could develop their ability in
listening and speaking skills by experiencing such activities.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
69
There were still other data results from the questionnaires distributed to the
students. The students might choose more than one option. The data of the students’
questionnaires are presented as follows.
Table 4.3: The Results of Need Questionnaires
No. Statements Percentage
1.
The reasons why the students felt that learning
listening and speaking skills were difficult:
a. Lack of vocabulary items
b. Lack of confidence
c. Unable to concentrate well
92,5%
35%
5%
2.
The advantages of learning listening and
speaking in the form of group work:
a. Students could learn from each other
when they found difficulty in learning
listening and speaking.
b. Students could increase their confidence
in learning listening and speaking.
90%
45%
3.
Learning activities that were interesting to
encourage the students for developing listening
and speaking skills.
a. Role play
b. Games
c. Group discussion
62,5%
62,5%
65%
4.
The topics that attracted the students’ attention:
a. Health
b. Environment
c. Culture
32, 5%
7,5 %
55 %
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
70
No. Statements Percentage
d. Technology
e. Education
f. Social
50 %
55 %
0%
5. Students practiced their listening skill by
listening to English songs and news. They also
practiced their speaking skill by speaking in
English with their English teachers and friends.
95%
From the data above, it seemed that most students found difficulties in
learning listening and speaking skills because of their lack of vocabulary items.
Besides, the data above revealed that most students preferred to learn listening and
speaking in form of group works since they could learn from each other when they
found difficulties.
Based on the data and information on the students’ needs and interests
gathered from conducting the interviews and distributing the questionnaires, the
writer decided some learning topics, listening and speaking activities and exercises,
listening and speaking materials, and learning sources.
2. Planning
The planning step was conducted after the research and information collecting
step. In this step, the writer elaborated three steps of Kemp’s model, namely,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
71
formulating goals and general purposes, choosing topics, and specifying learning
objectives.
a. Formulating the goals and the general purposes
Based on the results of the research and information collecting, particularly
the ones related to the goals of English subject for senior high school students and the
standard competences of KTSP for English lesson for the eleventh grade students, the
writer formulated the goals and the general purposes of the designed materials. The
goals were adapted from the regulation of Education Minister of Indonesia No. 22/
2006 (Depdiknas, 2006: 307). The goals were:
1. Developing communicative competence in both written and oral forms in
order to achieve the informational literacy level.
2. Recognizing the essence and the importance of English language in order to
improve national and global competitiveness.
3. Developing learners’ understanding on the relation between languages and
cultures.
In addition, the writer formulated the general purposes by considering the
standard competences in KTSP. The general purposes of designing the materials are
presented as follows.
1) Listening
to enable the students to be able to understand the meanings in sustained
transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life contexts and to
access knowledge.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
72
to enable the students to be able to understand the meanings of short
functional texts and monolog in the form of report, narrative, and analytical
exposition in daily life contexts and to access knowledge.
2) Speaking
to enable the students to be able to express the meanings in sustained
transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life contexts and to
access knowledge.
to enable the students to be able to express the meanings in short functional
texts and monolog in form of report, narrative, and analytical exposition in
daily life contexts and to access knowledge.
b. Choosing some topics
In this step, the writer selected some learning topics by considering the
curriculum to find out whether the topics were appropriate or not to be given to senior
high school students grade eleven. Additionally, the writer considered the topics that
were interesting and suitable for the students by considering the results of the
research and information collecting. Hence, there were six topics selected in this
study. The topics are presented on the following page.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
73
Table 4.4: The Lists of Topics
UNIT GENRE OF TEXT TOPIC
1. Report Environment
2. Report Education
3. Narrative Legend
4. Narrative Porquoi Tale
5. Analytical exposition Digital Library
6. Analytical exposition Health
c. Specifying the learning objectives
In this step the writer stated the learning objectives in terms of students’
behavioral outcomes which should be achieved by the students at the end of the
course. The writer categorized the learning objectives into general learning objectives
and specific learning objectives. The general objectives were the objectives that were
not measurable. Whereas, the specific objectives were the objectives that were
measurable, as stated by Kemp (1977: 24) that objectives should be measurable.
The general learning objectives were taken from the basic competences for
listening and speaking skills for the eleventh grade students of senior high school.
The general learning objectives of designing the materials were specified on the
following page.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
74
Listening:
to enable the students to be able to respond meanings in sustained
transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse
accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts
involving expressions used for giving opinions and asking for opinions, and
expressing satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
to enable the students to be able to respond meanings in sustained
transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse
accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts
involving expressions used for giving advice, warning, permitting, and
expressing relief, pain, and pleasure.
to enable the students to be able to respond meanings in monolog texts using
spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life
contexts in form of report, narrative, and analytical exposition.
Speaking:
to enable the students to be able to express meanings in sustained
transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse
accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts
involving expressions used for giving opinions and asking for opinions, and
expressing satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
75
to enable the students to be able to express meanings in sustained
transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse
accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts
involving expressions used for giving advice, warning, permitting, and
expressing relief, pain, and pleasure
to enable the students to be able to express meanings in monolog texts using
spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life
contexts in form of report, narrative, and analytical exposition.
In addition, the writer formulated the specific objectives according to the
topics of the material units. The specific learning objectives were used and
developed as learning indicators to recognize the students’ achievement in the study
since the specific objectives could be used to measure the students’ performance
achievements. The specific learning objectives are presented as follows.
Table 4. 5: The Specific Learning Objectives of the Designed Materials
Unit Main Materials Specific Learning Objectives
1
Report text
“Environment”
• Identify the expressions of asking for
opinion
• Identify the expressions of giving
opinion
• Answer comprehension questions
related to the problems the students
listen/ watch
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
76
Unit Main Materials Specific Learning Objectives
• Find the meaning of vocabulary items
related to the problem discussed
• Express some opinions on the topic
discussed
• Identify the expressions of asking for
advice
• Identify the expressions of giving
advice
• Identify the expressions of warning
• Identify the expressions for giving
permission
• Use the expressions of asking for
advice.
• Use the expressions of giving advice
2
Report text
“Education”
• Identify the expressions of
satisfaction
• Identify the expressions of
dissatisfaction
• Answer comprehension questions
related to the report texts students
listen
• Identify the generic structure of
report text
• Mention the purpose of report text
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
77
Unit Main Materials Specific Learning Objectives
3 Narrative text
“Legend”
• Identify the generic structure of
narrative text
• Identify the main idea from narrative
text students listen
• Find the meaning of vocabulary items
students listen
• Answer comprehension questions
related to the story students listen
• Mention some examples of narrative
text
• Mention the purpose of narrative text
• Retell the story using students’ own
words
4 Narrative text
“Pourquoi tale”
• Complete a pourquoi text by listening
to partners
• Find the meaning of vocabulary items
students hear
• Answer comprehension questions
• Present the answers of the
comprehension questions in front of
the class
• Mention other examples of pourquoi
tale
5 Analytical exposition text
“Digital Library”
• Identify the main idea of analytical
exposition students hear
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
78
Unit Main Materials Specific Learning Objectives
• Identify some arguments listened
• Express some arguments on the
importance of reading
6 Analytical exposition text
“Health”
• Identify the expressions of relief
• Identify the expressions of pain
• Identify the expressions of pleasure
• Answer comprehension questions.
• Use the expressions of relief
• Use the expressions of pain
• Use the expressions of pleasure
• Present the answers for the
comprehension questions
3. Developing the Preliminary Form of Product
Having formulated the goals and general purposes, the writer began
developing the preliminary form of product. This step consisted of three parts,
namely, choosing subject contents, selecting teaching and learning activities and
instructional resources, and designing materials. The steps are elaborated as follows.
a. Choosing the Subject Contents
In this step, the writer selected some listening and speaking materials from
various sources. The writer gathered the listening materials in the form of videos
taken from some international networks since the listening sources were abundant and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
79
they were easy to use. Besides, the writer also gathered several articles consisting of
narrative, report, and analytical exposition texts for the speaking materials.
In addition, the writer took some theories on the generic structures,
communicative purposes of the genres, and several expressions related to some
language functions from an English textbook used for teaching English for the
eleventh grade students of senior high school. The title of the book was Look Ahead 2
“An English Course for Senior High School Students Year XI”.
b. Selecting the Teaching and Learning Activities and Instructional Resources
Having selected the appropriate subject contents, the writer then selected
teaching and learning activities. The writer selected some teaching and learning
activities such think-pair share, creative dictation, jigsaw activities, three steps
interview, simulation task, presentation, prediction task, problem solving task, group
discussion, and three minutes review since they were in accordance with the
Collaborative Learning principles. The writer also considered some support services
such as equipment and facilities in selecting the learning activities like language
laboratory, computer, and speakers.
In addition, the writer developed a syllabus and lesson plans to support the
goals and the general purposes. In this study, the writer developed a functional
syllabus. In the syllabus, each meeting time was allocated in 2 x 45’. The writer
presented various topics in six units including the learning indicators.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
80
c. Designing the Materials
As stated in Chapter II and III, the writer made use of materials adaptation
techniques in designing the set of materials (Tomlinson and Masuhara, 2004; 15).
The writer applied the Plus Category that included addition and expansion techniques
by adding different listening passages to develop listening and speaking activities.
Besides, the writer applied the Zero Category specifically modification technique by
changing the instructions of the listening passage.
In detail, each unit of the instructional materials was divided into three parts,
namely: pre-activity, whilst-activity, and post- activity. More specifically, each
section consisted of several learning activities selected by the writer which aimed to
achieve each learning objective. Here, the writer elaborated each section in the
designed set of materials as follows.
1). Pre-Activity
The writer wrote down the pre-activity step as Build up knowledge. This pre-
activity section aimed to activate the students’ background knowledge on the topics
discussed. This section included several pre-listening activities consisting of
vocabulary building and think-pair share. This pre-activity section was essential since
it enabled the students to be familiar with some vocabulary items that would be heard
in the listening passages. The students then were asked to find the meaning and/ or
synonym of several vocabulary items related to the topic discussed.
Additionally, the students would acquire better understanding on the topics
discussed by activating the students’ background knowledge by implementing think-
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
81
pair step activity. In think-pair step activity, the writer provided some pictures related
to the topic discussed and some questions based on the provided pictures.
2). Whilst-Activity
In this section, the writer divided the whilst-activity into two sections, namely
Let’s Listen and Let’s Speak. The listening section consisted of several activities like
jigsaw activities, creative dictation, listening and watching videos, answering
comprehension questions, and completing some missing words of narrative, report,
and analytical exposition texts. The speaking section consisted of several activities
like three- step interview, prediction task, presentation, simulation task, and group
discussion.
The designed materials also included language functions materials. There
were several language functions to teach as stated in the standard competences and
basic competences for the eleventh grade students of senior high school. They
included asking and giving opinion; asking and giving advice; warning; asking and
giving permission; expressing relief, pain and pleasure; and expressing satisfaction
and dissatisfaction.
Since this study aimed to design a set of integrated listening and speaking
materials, the writer tried to integrate the listening and speaking activities into
intertwine learning activities. Hence, the first main activities were mostly in the form
of listening activities or task. After that, the students were asked to do several tasks
and exercises based on the listening passage and/or video they watched. They would
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
82
continue the learning activities by learning particular language functions.
Subsequently, the students would do the speaking tasks and exercises after learning
the language function and experiencing several listening tasks and exercises.
3). Post-Activity
The post activity section aimed to find out the students’ achievement on the
materials learnt and to review what the students had learnt. The writer named the
post-activity section as Let’s Wrap up. This section included a learning task like
three-minute review.
4. The Preliminary Field-testing
After the materials design finished, the writer conducted the preliminary field
– testing. This step was aimed to know the appropriateness and evaluate the designed
materials for teaching the eleventh grade students of science class of SMAN 1 Depok.
In this step, the writer evaluated the materials by conducting expert validation and
trying out the designed materials in a Science class of SMAN 1 Depok. The
elaboration of the preliminary field testing steps is presented as follows.
a. Expert Validation
This step was aimed to gain product validation and evaluate the designed
materials from some respondents who were considered as experts in the fields of
language teaching and material design. The respondents were two English teachers of
SMAN 1 Depok and two lecturers of English Language Education Study Program of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
83
Sanata Dharma University. Both of the English teachers taught the eleventh grade
students. One of the lecturers taught listening and speaking classes, while the other
lecturer taught instructional design class. The writer presented the description of the
respondents as follows.
Table 4.6: Description of the Respondents
Group of
participants
Sex Educational Background Teaching experience
(years)
M F S1 S2 S3 < 5 5 - 10 10 <
English lecturers - 2 1 1 - - 2 -
English teachers 1 1 2 - - - 1 1
For conducting the expert validation, the writer distributed the designed
materials and interviewed the respondents to gain feedback and comments on the
designed set of materials. The respondents were asked some questions related to the
appropriateness of the materials designed. The questions were about the topics, the
listening and speaking materials, the activities and exercises, the materials
instructions, the materials arrangement (layout), and the strengths and the weaknesses
of the designed materials in general. Besides, the respondents were asked to give their
comments and suggestions on the designed materials. The results of the interviews
are presented on the next page.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
84
Table 4.8: The Results of the Expert Validation Questionnaires
No Aspect Respondents
The English teachers of SMAN 1 Depok The lecturers of English Education Study
Program of Sanata Dharma University
1. Material Contents
a. Topics • The topics were well selected and
arranged
• The topics were various and
interesting
• The topics mostly fulfilled
students’ needs because the
students needed to learn report,
narrative, and analytical exposition
texts.
• The topics were well selected and
arranged
• The topics were mostly various and
interesting
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
85
b. Materials • Most of the designed set of
materials had been developed to
improve both listening and
speaking skills.
• It seemed that the writer involved
more speaking materials than
listening materials.
• The learning materials matched
with the standard competence and
basic competence of KTSP.
• The quality of the recorded
materials was good enough
• The set of integrated listening and
speaking materials had already
covered listening and speaking
activities which enabled the students
to develop two skills at one time.
• The listening and speaking materials
were arranged with suitable
proportion.
• The learning materials matched with
the standard competence and basic
competence of KTSP.
• The quality of the recorded materials
was good enough.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
86
c. The materials in
general
• Generally, the materials were well-
arranged and well-elaborated.
• Generally, the materials were well-
arranged and well-elaborated
d. The strengths and
the weakness of the
materials
The strengths:
• The writer focused on
Collaborative Learning activities.
• The learning activities enabled the
students to participate actively in
the learning process.
• The listening and speaking
materials were various and
interesting.
The weakness:
• There were too many exercises.
• The size of the pictures was too
small.
The strengths:
• The writer had chosen the learning
activities appropriately to integrate
both listening and speaking skills.
• The writer had tried to find several
sources.
The weakness:
• The evaluation tools were not really
clear.
• The writer only used Times New
Roman font.
• There were too many exercises.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
87
2. Activities and Exercises
a. Activities
• Instruction
• The variety of
listening and
speaking
activities
• The instructions for each learning
activity were clear enough.
• The listening and speaking
activities were various and
interesting except for unit 2.
• The listening and speaking
activities enabled the students to be
actively involved in the learning
process especially for the speaking
activities.
• The instructions for each learning
activity were clear enough.
• The listening and speaking activities
were quite various and interesting.
The writer needed to vary the
learning activities in some units.
• The listening and speaking activities
enabled the students to be actively
involved in the learning process
especially for the learning activities
like jigsaw activity and group
discussion.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
88
b. The listening and
speaking exercises
• The listening and speaking
exercises were quite various and
interesting. The writer needed to
improve the exercises since it
seemed too many vocabulary
exercises.
• The listening and speaking
exercises matched with the
Collaborative Learning principles.
• The level of difficulty of the
materials was suitable for the
eleventh grade students except for
units 2 and 5.
• The listening and speaking exercises
were not various and interesting. The
writer needed to add listening and
speaking exercises, not only listening
and answering questions.
• The listening and speaking exercises
matched with the Collaborative
Learning principles.
• The level of difficulty of the materials
was suitable for the eleventh grade
students.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
89
3.
Materials Arrangement
a. Topics • It was better to arrange the topics
from the easiest to the more
complex ones.
• It was better to arrange the topics
from the easiest to the more complex
ones.
b. Activities and
exercises
• The activities were well organized.
The lesson covered pre-activity,
main activity, and post activity.
• The exercises were arranged
systematically from the simplest to
the most difficult ones.
• The activities were well organized.
The lesson covered pre-activity, main
activity, and post activity.
• The exercises were arranged
systematically from the simplest to
the most difficult ones except for
some units.
c. Lay out • The illustrations (photos, pictures,
etc) were appropriate to the topics
being discussed.
• The layout (position, size,
sequence, etc, both in text and
visuals) provided the focus of the
materials.
• The illustrations (photos, pictures,
etc) were appropriate to the topics
being discussed.
• The layout (position, size, sequence,
etc, both in text and visuals) provided
the focus of the materials.
• It was better to make the lay out of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
90
• It was better to make the lay out of
the designed materials more
colorful.
the designed materials more colorful.
• It was better to vary the font types
and sizes.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
91
Basically, all respondents agreed that the designed materials were well
developed. Two respondents stated that the materials had already integrated both
listening and speaking skills. The materials enabled the students to develop two skills
at one time. The other two respondents said that the designed set of materials using
Collaborative Learning was good and appropriate to motivate the students to learn
listening and speaking skills.
Nevertheless, there were some points to be considered by the writer. One
respondent stated that there were too many learning activities. Besides, two
respondents stated that there were several listening and speaking which were less
various and less challenging.
Therefore, the respondents gave some suggestions about the designed set of
materials. The suggestions are presented as follows.
1) The learning activities
Two respondents said that it would be better to vary the learning activities.
Besides, one respondent said that there were several learning activities which were
not challenging. Therefore, he suggested the writer to add other learning activities
that could challenge the students in learning listening and speaking.
2) The materials
The writer should rearrange the materials since there were some units which
were not arranged from the simplest materials to the most difficult ones. Besides, one
respondent said that the writer provided more speaking activities than listening
activities. Therefore, the writer needed to add some listening materials.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
92
3) The exercises
There were two respondents stated that there were too many exercises. They
suggested the writer to re-arrange the exercises.
4) The lay out
Four respondents suggested the writer to make the lay out of the designed set
of materials more interesting. One respondent suggested the writer to vary the fonts
used and make the pictures bigger. It would be better for the writer to make the lay
out of the designed materials more colorful.
b. Materials Try Out
The writer interviewed the English teacher to gain some feedback and
evaluation for the designed materials and revised them before they were tried out in
the class. Because of the time limitation, the writer only tried out one unit among six
units. The applied unit was a narrative text “Legend”.
After having tried out the designed materials, the writer distributed closed –
ended and open - ended questionnaires to the students. The questionnaires were
distributed to forty students of one Science class grade eleven at SMAN 1 Depok to
gather some feedbacks from the students on the tried out materials. The students were
asked to answer some questions dealing with the designed materials and give their
opinions as well. The data presentation of the results of the questionnaires is
presented on the following page.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
93
Table 4.8: Students’ Evaluation Questionnaires
No Respondents’ opinion on Agree Doubtful Disagree
1 The learning topic was interesting. 70% 30% 0 %
2 The applied listening and speaking material
enabled the students to develop listening
and speaking skills.
97, 5% 2,5% 0 %
3 The applied listening and speaking material
was interesting.
50% 45% 5%
4 The listening and speaking activities
enabled the students to participate actively
in the leaning process.
52,5 % 47, 5% 0 %
5 The students enjoyed learning listening and
speaking in form of group discussion.
62,5% 32,5% 5%
6 The students were able to improve their
confidence to speak in English by
experiencing the learning activities.
47, 5 % 50% 2,5%
7 The students could learn from other
students by learning in groups.
87, 5% 12,5% 0 %
8 The recorded materials were clear and
interesting.
72,5% 25% 2,5%
9 Learning activities in the form of group
works enabled the students to solve the
problems in learning listening and speaking.
70 % 25 % 5 %
10 In general, the applied listening and
speaking materials motivated the students
to learn listening and speaking skills.
75 % 25 % 0 %
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
94
From the results of the questionnaires, most students stated that the topic and
the listening and speaking materials were interesting. Most students agreed that the
learning materials and activities enabled them to develop listening and speaking skills
as well as to solve their problems in learning listening and speaking. The listening
and speaking activities enabled the students to participate actively in the leaning
process. Many students also stated that the applied listening and speaking material
motivated them to learn listening and speaking skills. In addition, most of the
students stated that the recorded materials were clear and interesting.
Most students stated that they enjoyed learning listening and speaking in form
of group discussion since they could learn from other students by learning in groups.
Nevertheless, many students were still doubtful whether the learning activities could
improve their confidence to speak in English. In addition, the students gave some
comments on the applied materials as follows.
The strength:
The materials enabled the students to cooperate in solving the problems in
learning listening and speaking. The students could change their opinions and
ideas using the target language. They could also develop their listening and
speaking skills and participate actively in the learning process
The weakness:
There were some students who did not participate actively in the learning process.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
95
In summary, the students enjoyed the tried-out materials since the topic, the
materials, and the activities were various and interesting. In addition, the students
could also develop their listening and speaking skills by learning from each other in
groups.
5. Changes to improve the materials
In this step, the writer revised and improved the designed set of materials. The
revisions and the improvements were based on the feedbacks gathered from the
evaluators.
Having gathered the data from conducting the evaluation, the writer revised
and improved the materials by considering some suggestions gained from the
evaluators. Based on the comments and suggestions from the evaluators, the writer
improved the materials related to subject contents, learning activities, and materials
layout. The revisions are specified as follows.
1) The learning activities
Responding to the suggestions of two respondents, the writer varied the
learning activities and tasks and added more challenging listening and speaking
activities. In addition, the writer also reduced the number of exercises in some units.
2) The materials
The writer rearranged the materials from the simplest materials to the most
difficult ones. Specifically, the writer rearranged the materials in units two and three.
The writer also provided more listening materials in unit five and six.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
96
3) The material scripts
The writer provided and enclosed the script of the listening passage for the
teachers.
4) The lay out of the designed materials
The writer improved the lay out of the designed materials and made it more
interesting. The writer varied the fonts used and made the pictures bigger. Besides,
the writer made the materials more colorful to make them more interesting. The
writer made improvements and adjustments based on the accepted suggestions.
B. The Presentation of the Designed Set of Materials
This section is presented to answer the second question stated in the problem
formulation dealing with the presentation of the designed set of materials. The
materials consisted of six units and each unit required 90 minutes except for unit 1.
There were some sections in each unit. They were ‘Building knowledge’, ‘Let’s
listen’, ‘Let’s speak’, and ‘Let’s wrap up’.
The writer presented the topics, the functions, and the sections of the designed
materials on the following page.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
97
Unit Topics Genre and Functions Sections
1
Meeting 1
Environment Report text
Asking and giving
opinions
1) Building knowledge : Think-pair share and vocabulary
2) Let’s listen : Listening to report text
3) Exercises
4) Let’s speak (Practice): Think-pair share and
presentation
5) Language focus: Asking and giving opinion
6) Let’s wrap up: Reviewing today’s material
1
Meeting 2
Environment Asking and giving
advice
Warning
Report text
1) Building knowledge : Prediction Task
2) Let’s listen: Watching and listening to videos
3) Exercises
4) Let’s speak (Practice): Three steps interview
5) Language focus: Asking for and giving advice and
warning
6) Let’s wrap up: Three minute review
Table 4.9: The Presentation of the Designed Materials
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
98
2 Education
Report text
Expressing satisfaction
and dissatisfaction
1) Building knowledge: Think-pair share
2) Let’s listen: Creative dictation and listen to an
interview
3) Exercises
4) Let’s speak (practice) : Simulation task
5)Language focus : Expressing satisfaction and
dissatisfaction
6) Let’s wrap up: Three minute review
3 Legend
Narrative text 1) Building knowledge: Think-pair share
2) Let’s listen: Jigsaw activity and vocabulary
3) Exercises
4)Let’s speak (practice): Group discussion and
presentation
5) Let’s wrap up: Three minute review
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
99
4 Pourquoi tale Narrative text 1) Building knowledge : Think-pair share and vocabulary building 2) Let’s listen: Creative dictation and Partner 3) Exercises 4) Let’s speak (practice) : Presentation 5) Let’s wrap up: Three minute review
5 Digital library Analytical exposition text
1) Building knowledge: Partner 2) Let’s listen: Listen to an analytical exposition text 3) Exercises 4) Let’s speak (practice) : Three steps interview, partner, presentation 5) Let’s wrap up: Three minute review
6 Health Expressing relief, pain, and pleasure
1) Building knowledge: Think-pair share 2) Let’s listen Listen to an analytical exposition text (videos) Creative dictation 3) Exercises 4) Let’s speak : Discussion, presentation, and partner 5) Let’s wrap up Three minute review
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
100
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
This chapter discusses two parts, namely, conclusions and suggestions. The
conclusions part presents the conclusions on the steps conducted in this study and
also the findings in order to answer the questions in the problem formulation. The
suggestions part presents the recommendation for the English teachers of the school,
for the students, and other researchers.
A. Conclusions
The objectives of this study were to design a set of integrated listening and
speaking materials based on Collaborative Learning for the eleventh grade students of
SMAN 1 Depok and to present the designed set of the integrated listening and
speaking materials. There were two problems in this study. They were: 1) how a set
of integrated listening and speaking materials based on Collaborative Learning for the
eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Depok was designed, and 2) what the
designed set of integrated listening and speaking materials based on Collaborative
Learning for the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Depok looked like.
From the results of distributing questionnaires to one class of Science
department grade eleven of SMAN 1 Depok, it turned out that the students were
interested in learning listening skill which was integrated with speaking skill and
100
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
101
learn those two skills in the form of group works. Therefore, the writer designed a set
of integrated listening and speaking materials based on Collaborative Learning by
adapting Kemp’s model, R & D method, and by considering the KTSP.
The writer employed the instructional design models proposed by Kemp
(1977) combined with R & D method in order to answer the first problem
formulation. The writer adapted Kemp’s instructional design model and R & D
method which were furthermore applied in this study into five steps. The steps were:
1) research and information collecting including conducting needs analysis or
identifying learners’ characteristics; 2) planning consisting of formulating goal and
general purposes, choosing some topics, and specifying the learning objectives; 3)
developing preliminary form of product including choosing subject contents,
selecting teaching and learning activities and instructional resources, and designing
materials; 4) preliminary field testing (evaluation) by carrying out expert validation
for the designed materials; and 5) main product revision. The writer, then, applied
those five steps in designing a set of integrated listening and speaking materials based
on Collaborative Learning for the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Depok.
The answer of the second problem was the presentation of the designed set of
integrated listening and speaking materials based on Collaborative Learning for the
eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Depok. The writer presented the final
revision of the designed set of materials on the appendix 8. The six units of the
designed materials are presented on the next page.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Unit 1: Environment (report text)
Unit 2: Education (report text)
Unit 3: The Legend (narrative text)
Unit 4: Pourquoi Tale (narrative text)
Unit 5: Digital Library (analytical exposition text)
Unit 6: Health (analytical exposition text)
Additionally each unit contained five sections, namely ‘Building Knowledge’,
‘Let’s Listen’, ‘Exercises’, ‘Let’s Speak’, and ‘Let’s Wrap Up’. The ‘Building
Knowledge’ section was applied for the pre-activity. The ‘Let’s Listen’, ‘Exercises’,
and ‘Let’s Speak’ sections were applied for the main activities. In addition, the ‘Let’s
Wrap Up’ section was applied for the post-activity.
B. Suggestions
Based on the conclusions, the writer would like to propose some suggestions
for the English teachers, students of senior high school grade eleven, and other
researchers. The suggestions are as follows.
1. For the English teachers, especially the English teachers of SMAN 1 Depok
a. The writer suggest the teachers apply the designed materials for teaching the
eleventh grade students in order to make listening and speaking classes more
interesting and challenging.
102
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
b. The teacher may use various sources such as international networks to select
interesting materials.
2. For the students
The materials were designed for the students, especially for the eleventh grade
students of SMAN 1 Depok. The writer suggests the students to cooperate well with
their pairs and groups in order to develop their ability to use English for
communication.
3. For the other researchers
The writer suggests the other researchers who have the same interest with the
writer apply Collaborative Learning approach to integrate four language skills to
achieve good mastery in English.
103
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
104
REFERENCES
Anderson, A. and Lynch, T. 1988. Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
Great Clarendon Street. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C, and Razavieh, A. 2002. Introduction to Research in
Education. Belmont: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
Astuti, C. P. 2005. Designing a Set of Speaking Instructional Materials Based on Cooperative Learning for Tourist Andong Drivers in Borobudur, Magelang. Unpublished Thesis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
Borg, W. R., and Gall, M. D. 1983. Educational Research: An Introduction (4th
edition). London: Longman.
Brown, H.D. 2001. Teaching by Principles. An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Davies, P. 2000. Success in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan
Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum, BadanPenelitian dan Pengembangan.
Goh, Christine C. M. (2002). Teaching Listening in the Language Classroom.
Singapore: SEAMEO. Hamacheck, D. E. 1985. Psychology in Teaching, Learning, and Growth.
Massachusetts: Allyn and Baconn, Inc. Harmer, J. 1991. The Practice of English Language Teaching. England: Longman. Hornby, A. S. 1995. Advanced Learners Dictionary. New York: Oxford University
Press. Hutchinson, T., and Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-
Centered approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
105
Johnson, D. W. 1994. Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative and Individually
Learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Kemp, J. E. 1977. Instructional Design. Belmont: Fearon Pitman Publishers, Inc.
Kessler, C. 1992. Cooperative Language Learning. New Jersey: Prentice – Hall, Inc.
Krahnke, K. (1987). Approaches to Syllabus Design for Foreign Language Teaching.
New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Larsen-Freeman, D. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Muslich, M. 2007. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP): Dasar
Pemahaman dan Pengembangan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. .
Nunan, D. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw Hill. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2006
tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Richard, J. C. and Rodgers, T. S. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rumjati, W. G. 2006. Designing a Set of Instructional Speaking Materials for the
Extracurricular Activities based on the Principles of Cooperative Learning for the Second Year Students of SMAN 1 Godean-Sleman, Yogyakarta. Unpublished Thesis. Yogyakarta: English Education Study Program, Sanata Dharma University.
Slavin, R. E. 1995. Cooperative Learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston:
Allyn and Bacon. Strevens, P. 1993. Teaching English as an International Language: From Principle
to Principle. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Tomlinson, B. and Masuhara, H. 2004. Developing Language Course Materials.
Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
106
Widdowson, H. G. 1979. Teaching Language as Communication. London: Oxford
University Press.
Wulandari, D. 2005. Designing a Set of English Instructional Materials to Teach Speaking to Street Children in MILAS Mangkuyudan, Yogyakarta Using Cooperative Learning. Unpublished Thesis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Letters of Permission
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
107
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
108
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
109
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Interview Guideline
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
110
List of questions for the interview (Interview Guideline)
Interview (need survey)
Respondent: English teacher of SMAN 1 Depok
1. How is students’ involvement in learning listening and speaking skills?
Do they participate actively in the learning process?
2. What are students’ experiences in learning listening skill?
3. What are students’ experiences in learning speaking skill?
4. What are students’ difficulties in learning listening?
5. What are students’ difficulties in learning speaking?
6. What learning materials do you apply to teach listening and speaking
skills?
7. What teaching media do you use to teach listening and speaking skills?
8. What is your opinion on the use of Collaborative Learning approach for
conducting listening and speaking activities?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Interview Transcript
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
111
Interview Transcript
No Questions Answers
1. How is students’ involvement
in learning listening and
speaking skills? Do they
participate actively in the
learning process?
Most of the students participated actively in
the process of learning listening and speaking
skills. They were interested in learning
listening and speaking. Besides, they were
quite cooperative to do the activities in class.
2. What are students’
experiences in learning
listening skill?
The students experienced some listening
activities through watching movies and
listening to the passages. Subsequently, they
analyzed the genre of the listening passages
including the generic structure, the moral
value, and the main idea of the listening
passage.
3. What are students’
experiences in learning
speaking skill?
The students experienced speaking activities
through story telling, presentation, role play,
and group discussion.
4. What are students’ difficulties
in learning listening?
1. The speakers spoke so fast that the
students could not comprehend the
materials well.
2. The students often found difficulties
in understanding the native – like
pronunciation.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
112
No Questions Answers
5. What are students’ difficulties
in learning speaking?
The students sometimes felt unconfident to
speak in English because of their lack of
vocabulary items.
6. What learning materials do
you apply to teach listening
and speaking skills?
The teacher mostly applied learning
materials taken from international network
and English textbooks.
7. What teaching media do you
use to teach listening and
speaking skills?
The teacher used handouts, English
textbooks, computer, headsets, and speakers.
8. What is your opinion on the
use of Collaborative Learning
approach for conducting
listening and speaking
activities?
The teacher thought that Collaborative
Learning approach could be applied for
teaching listening and speaking skills to
enable the students to participate actively
in the learning process.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Needs Analysis Questionnaire
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
113
Kuesioner (Need Analysis)
Respondent : Siswa SMAN 1 Depok kelas XI Program IPA Tahun Ajaran : 2008/2009 Berilah tanda centang (√) pada jawaban berdasarkan pernyataan-pernyataan di bawah ini! 1= sangat tidak setuju 3= setuju 2=tidak setuju 4= sangat setuju
Pernyataan – Pernyataan 1 2 3 4 1. Saya termasuk siswa aktif dalam kegiatan belajar Bahasa
Inggris.
2. Keterampilan mendengarkan (listening) dan berbicara (speaking) merupakan keterampilan berbahasa yang menarik minat saya.
3. Saya menikmati kegiatan belajar mendengarkan listening dan berbicara speaking serta berperan aktif dalam kegiatan belajar ini.
4. Materi pembelajaran listening dan speaking memampukan saya terlibat aktif dalam setiap kegiatan pembelajaran tersebut.
5. Saya sering mengalami kesulitan pada saat belajar Bahasa Inggris terutama dalam kegiatan belajar listening dan speaking.
6. Saya mengalami kesulitan dalam menerima materi pembelajaran listening dan speaking sehingga saya cenderung bersikap pasif.
7. Saya segera bertanya pada guru atau teman apabila mengalami kesulitan dalam menerima materi pembelajaran listening dan speaking.
8. Saya lebih tertarik belajar listening dan speaking melalui kegiatan belajar yang melibatkan kelompok.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
114
Pernyataan – Pernyataan 1 2 3 4
9. Saya mampu mengembangkan keterampilan listening dan
speaking melalui kegiatan belajar yang melibatkan kelompok.
10. Kegiatan belajar dalam bentuk games (permainan), role-play
(drama), dan group discussion (diskusi kelompok) lebih
menarik minat saya dalam proses pembelajaran listening dan
speaking.
Jawablah pertanyaan-pertanyaan di bawah ini dengan memberikan tanda silang (X) pada jawaban yang sesuai dengan pendapat anda! Anda dapat menambahkan jawaban anda sendiri. 11. Menurut anda, hal-hal apa saja yang menyebabkan anda mengalami kesulitan
belajar Bahasa Inggris, khususnya dalam keterampilan mendengarkan
(listening) dan berbicara (speaking)?
a. Kurangnya perbendaharaan kata.
b. Kurangnya rasa percaya diri untuk mengungkapkan kalimat.
c. (Lain-lain)
……………………………………………………………………….
12. Apakah manfaat yang anda peroleh dengan adanya kegiatan belajar
mendengarkan (listening) dan berbicara (speaking) yang melibatkan
kelompok?
a. Saya bisa belajar dari teman jika mengalami kesulitan dalam proses
pembelajaran listening dan speaking.
b. Saya bisa meningkatkan rasa percaya diri melalui kegiatan listening dan
speaking melalui kelompok.
c. (Lain-lain)
…………………………………………………………………………
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
115
13. Kegiatan belajar apa saja yang menurut anda menarik dan mendukung
anda untuk mengembangkan keterampilan listening dan speaking?
a. Kegiatan belajar melalui role play (drama) dan games (permainan)
b. Kegiatan belajar dengan group discussion (diskusi kelompok)
c. (Lain-lain)
14. Pilihlah topik-topik pembelajaran yang menurut anda menarik untuk
diterapkan dalam pembelajaran mendengarkan (listening) dan berbicara
(speaking)! (Jawaban bisa lebih dari satu)
a. Health d. Technology
b. Environment e. Education
c. Culture f.(lain-lain)
…………………………………………………………………………….
15. Apa yang anda lakukan untuk mengatasi kesulitan dalam kegiatan belajar
listening dan speaking?
a. Banyak berlatih mendengarkan (listening) dari lagu dan/atau berita dalam
bahasa Inggris.
b. Membiasakan diri berbicara dalam bahasa Inggris dengan teman dan guru.
c.(lain - lain)……………………………………………………………………
Terimakasih
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Designed Materials Evaluation Questionnaire
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Questionnaire (Feedback) Respondent : English teachers of SMAN 1 Depok grade XI
Year : 2008/2009
Put a tick (√) in the column which represents your point of agreement on the
following statements!
1= Strongly disagree
2=Disagree
3=Agree
4=Strongly Agree
Statements 1 2 3 4
1. The designed materials have already matched with the
standard competence and basic competence of Kurikulum
Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan.
2. The materials have already covered listening and speaking
activities which enable the students to develop those two
skills at one time.
3. The listening and speaking materials are arranged with
suitable proportion.
4. The designed materials have already fulfilled the students’
needs.
5. The learning materials are arranged systematically from the
simplest learning materials to the most difficult ones.
6. The level of difficulty of the learning materials is suitable for
the students.
7. The learning activities are various and interesting.
8. The arranged learning activities enable the students to be
actively involved in teaching-learning activities.
9. The chosen learning topics have already fulfilled the
students’ needs.
10. The arranged learning activities have already matched with
the collaborative learning principles.
116
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11. In general, which part of these materials that should be improved? Would
you please give some suggestions as the basis to revise them?
12. What is your opinion about the arranged syllabus and the lesson unit plan?
Would you please give some suggestions to revise them?
117
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Questionnaire (Feedback)
Respondent: The lecturers of English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma
University.
Berilah tanda centang pada jawaban berdasarkan pernyataan-pernyataan di bawah
ini!
1= Strongly disagree
2=Disagree
3=Agree
4=Strongly Agree Pernyataan 1 2 3 4
1. The learning materials have already matched with the standard competence and basic competence of Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan
2. The arranged materials have already developed constructivism.
3. The arranged materials have already facilitated Contextual Teaching Learning achievement.
4. The arranged learning activities have already matched with the collaborative learning principles.
5. The learning activities are various and interesting. 6. The learning materials are arranged systematically from
the simplest to the most difficult materials in which students are required to think critically.
7. The arranged learning activities enable the students to be actively involved in teaching-learning activities.
8. The level of difficulty of the learning materials is suitable for the students.
9. The materials have already covered listening and speaking activities which enable the students to develop those two skills at one time.
10. The listening and speaking materials are arranged with suitable proportion.
118
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11. In general, which part of these materials that should be improved? Would you
please give some suggestions as the basis to revise them?
12. What is your opinion about the arranged syllabus and the lesson unit plan?
Would you please give some suggestions to revise them?
119
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
VALIDATION OF PRODUCT
Arrangement:
1. How is the material instruction?
2. How is the material systematic arrangement?
3. How is the lay out of the materials?
Content:
1. How is the materials’ composition?
2. How is the materials’ clarity?
3. How is the materials’ entailment?
4. How is the materials’ influence to enable the students to interact with other
students?
5. How are the materials evaluation tools?
6. How is the relation between standard competence in KTSP with the topics and
indicators?
7. How is the materials relevancy and suitability?
8. How is the recorded materials’ quality in terms of sound and visualization?
9. What do you think about the materials in general?
10. What is the strength of the designed materials?
11. What is the weakness of the designed materials?
Comment and suggestion:
1. What is your comment and suggestion on the designed materials?
2. In general, which part of these materials that should be improved? Would
you please give some suggestions as the basis to revise them?
3. What is your opinion about the arranged syllabus and the lesson unit plan?
Would you please give some suggestions to revise them?
120
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
MATERIALS EVALUATION
Respondent: English teacher of SMAN 1 Depok grade eleven
Name :
Educational background:
• Bachelor Degree (S1) [ ]
• Master Degree (S2) [ ]
• Doctoral Degree (S3) [ ]
• (Other) ………
Teaching experience:
• 1 – 5 years [ ]
• 6 – 10 years [ ]
• 11 – 15 years [ ]
• 16 – 20 years [ ]
Please answer the following questions!
1. Topics:
Do the learning topics fulfill students’ needs? (Would you please give some
reasons?)
Are the learning topics various and interesting?
2. Listening and speaking materials:
Do the set of integrated listening and speaking materials cover listening and
speaking activities which enable the students to develop two skills at one
time?
Are the listening and speaking materials arranged with suitable proportion?
121
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Are the learning materials arranged systematically from the simplest to the
most difficult materials?
Is the level of difficulty of the learning materials suitable for the students?
Do the learning materials fulfill the students’ needs?
Do the learning materials match with the standard competence and basic
competence of Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan?
3. Listening and speaking activities:
Are the listening and speaking activities various and interesting?
Are the listening and speaking activities enable the students to be actively
involved in the learning process?
Do the arranged learning activities match with the Collaborative Learning
principles?
4. Exercises:
Are the listening and speaking exercises various and interesting?
Do the exercises match with the Collaborative Learning principles?
5. Instructions:
Are the instructions for each learning activity clear enough?
Thank you
122
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
MATERIALS EVALUATION
Respondent: Lecturer of English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma
University
Name :
Educational background:
• Bachelor Degree (S1) [ ]
• Master Degree (S2) [ ]
• Doctoral Degree (S3) [ ]
• (Other) ………
Teaching experience:
• 1 – 5 years [ ]
• 6 – 10 years [ ]
• 11 – 15 years [ ]
• 16 – 20 years [ ]
Please answer the following questions!
1. Topics:
Do the learning topics fulfill students’ needs? (Would you please give some
reasons?)
Are the learning topics various and interesting? (Would you please give some
reasons?)
Are the learning topics match with the standard competence and learning
indicators stated in KTSP? (Would you please give some reasons?
123
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2. Listening and speaking materials:
Do the set of integrated listening and speaking materials cover listening and
speaking activities which enable the students to develop two skills at one
time?
Are the listening and speaking materials arranged with suitable proportion
Are the learning materials arranged systematically from the simplest to the
most difficult materials?
Is the level of difficulty of the learning materials suitable for the students?
Do the learning materials fulfill the students’ needs
Do the learning materials match with the standard competence and basic
competence of Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan?
What do you think about the listening and speaking materials in general?
3. Listening and speaking activities:
Are the listening and speaking activities various and interesting?
Are the listening and speaking activities enable the students to be actively
involved in the learning process?
Do the arranged learning activities match with the Collaborative Learning
principles?
Do the learning activities enable the students to interact with other students?
4. Exercises:
Are the listening and speaking exercises various and interesting?
Do the exercises match with the Collaborative Learning principles?
124
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5. Materials evaluation tools:
How are the materials evaluation tools?
6. Material instructions:
Are the instructions for each learning activity clear enough?
7. Materials arrangement (lay out):
How is the lay out of the materials in term of color proportion of the
pictures
and the quality of the pictures?
8. How is the recorded materials’ quality in terms of sound and visualization?
Thank you
125
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Kuesioner (Feedback) Respondent: Siswa SMAN 1 Depok kelas XI IPA 1 Berilah tanda centang pada jawaban berdasarkan pernyataan-pernyataan di bawah ini! No Pernyataan Setuju Ragu-
ragu Tidak Setuju
1. Topik-topik pembelajaran dalam materi listening dan speaking menarik dan bervariasi.
2. Materi pembelajaran listening dan speaking memampukan saya mengembangkan keterampilan listening dan speaking
3. Materi pembelajaran listening dan speaking menarik dan bervariasi.
4. Kegiatan pembelajaran listening dan speaking memotivasi saya untuk terlibat aktif dalam proses belajar listening dan speaking.
5. Saya menikmati kegiatan belajar listening dan speaking dalam kelompok seperti diskusi kelompok, three-steps interview, dan think-pair share.
6. Saya mampu mengembangkan rasa percaya diri untuk berbicara dalam bahasa Inggris dengan kegiatan belajar tersebut.
7. Dengan kegiatan belajar seperti diskusi kelompok, saya bisa belajar dari teman apabila mengalami kesulitan.
8. Materi listening (video dan rekaman) cukup jelas dan menarik.
9. Materi listening dan speaking dengan Collaborative Learning membantu saya mengatasi masalah dalam kegiatan belajar listening dan speaking.
10. Secara umum, materi listening dan speaking lebih memotivasi saya untuk belajar listening dan speaking.
Jawablah pertanyaan-pertanyaan di bawah ini!
1. Menurut pendapat anda, apa saja kekuatan (strength) dan kelemahan (weaknesses) dari materi listening dan speaking dengan menggunakan Collaborative Learning?
2. Berikan komentar dan saran nda mengenai materi listening dan speaking
dengan menggunakan Collaborative Learning!
126
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Overview of the Designed Set of the Materials
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
DESIGNING A SET OF INTEGRATED LISTENING AND SPEAKING MATERIALS BASED ON COLLABORATIVE LEARNING FOR THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS
OF SMA NEGERI 1 DEPOK
OVERVIEW
This study is entitled “Designing a Set of Integrated Listening and Speaking
Materials Based on Collaborative Learning for the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA
Negeri 1 Depok”. This study is aimed at providing the eleventh grade students of
SMA Negeri 1 Depok with integrated listening and speaking materials that could
motivate them to learn, help to develop their listening and speaking skills, and also to
encourage cooperation among them.
A. Background
Listening and speaking skills play an essential role in acquiring the language.
Unfortunately, in a real listening and speaking class, it is noticed that students still
find many difficulties in learning the skills. Most students tend to be passive while
learning listening and speaking because of their lack of vocabulary items, difficulties
in comprehending some listening passages, and inability to make sentences. In
addition, most students are less cooperative with their pairs or groups in the process
of learning.
This study is aimed to offer a solution to solve some problems in relation to
Listening and Speaking. Therefore, it is essential to facilitate the teachers to provide
interesting listening and speaking materials which could meet both teachers’ and
students’ needs and solve the problems or difficulties they have in the real listening
and speaking class.
Collaborative Learning is a teaching approach where the learning activities
are conducted by grouping the students of different levels of ability into small teams.
127
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Through study teams and group discussion the students can learn from each other to
find out the meaning of new vocabulary items and learn how to make sentences. They
also have to be responsible to encourage each other to speak actively after listening to
their members’ opinions.
To encourage cooperation among the students so that they could help each other
to learn, Collaborative Learning is employed as the basis in designing materials. The
writer designs the materials by using several learning activities which are in
accordance with the principles of Collaborative Learning like jigsaw activities,
information gap, think-pair-share, and so on. These learning activities facilitate the
students in practicing listening to their group members’ ideas and information.
In brief, the writer attempted to design integrated listening and speaking
materials that could motivate the students to learn, to develop their listening and
speaking skills, and could encourage cooperation.
B. Purpose
The purpose of this design is to provide the eleventh grade students of SMAN 1
Depok with integrated listening and speaking materials that are expected to encourage
the students to learn and facilitate them to develop their listening and speaking skills.
The materials are purposely designed by employing listening medium (computer) and
listening sources from internets in the form of videos to provide interesting listening
materials, and speaking activities in the form of pair works and group works which
can enhance cooperation with other students in the learning process.
C. Content
There are six units in the designed materials. The activities of each unit are
categorized into three main activities, that is, pre-listening activity, whilst-listening
128
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
activity, and post-listening activity. The activities are structured into five main
sections, namely, ‘Building Knowledge’, ‘Let’s Listen’, ‘Exercises’, ‘Let’s Speak’,
and “Let’s Wrap Up.”
• ‘Building Knowledge’
This pre-activity section aimed to activate the students’ background
knowledge on the topics discussed. This section included several pre-listening
activities consisting of vocabulary building and think-pair share. This pre-activity
section was essential since it enabled the students to be familiar with some
vocabulary items that would be heard in the listening passages.
• Let’s Listen and Let’s Speak
Let’s Listen and Let’s Speak. The listening section consisted of several
activities like jigsaw activities, creative dictation, listening and watching videos.
The speaking section consisted of several activities like three- step interview,
prediction task, presentation, simulation task, and group discussion.
• Exercises
In this section, the students are asked to do several exercises after listening
and speaking activities like answering comprehension questions and presentation
practice.
• Let’s Wrap Up
This section aimed to find out the students’ achievement on the materials
learnt and to review what the students had learnt. The writer applies a learning
task like three-minute review.
129
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Syllabus and Lesson Plan
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
130
SYLLABUS
A SET OF INTEGRATED LISTENING AND SPEAKING MATERIALS BASED ON COLLABORATIVE LEARNING FOR THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 1 DEPOK
Standard Competence (KTSP)
Basic Competence Indicators Learning Materials
Learning Experiences Evaluation Tools
Time Source
Unit 1 Environment Listening 1. Understanding meanings in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life contexts 2. Understanding meanings in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life contexts
1.1 Responding meanings in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts involving expressions used for giving opinion and asking for opinion 1.2 Responding meanings in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts involving
Students are able to identify expressions of asking for opinion Students are able to identify expressions of giving opinion
Students are able to answer comprehension questions Students are able to identify expressions of asking for advice Students are able to identify expressions of giving advice
Asking for opinion: e.g. What do you think about it? Giving opinion:
e.g. I think it’s a good idea.
Asking for advice: e.g. Do you have any advice for …? Giving advice: e.g. I advise you to …?
Identifying the expressions of asking for opinion. Identifying the expressions of giving opinion. Answering comprehension questions Listening and watching video about environmental problems Identifying the expressions of asking for advice Identifying the expressions of giving advice Identifying the expressions of warning
Individual work Pair work Group work Group presentation Written assignment
4 x 45
Look Ahead 2, Jakarta: Erlangga http://images.google.co.id/images) http:www.youtube.com/watch?) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmFIzn3Ij http://images.google.co.id/images?q=landslide&btnG
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
131
Standard Competence (KTSP)
Basic Competence Indicators Learning Materials
Learning Experiences Evaluation Tools
Time Source
2. Understanding meanings in short functional texts and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life contexts
expressions used for advising, warning, and permitting Responding meanings in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately and fluently in daily life contexts in form of report, narrative, and analytical exposition texts
Students are able to identify expressions of warning Students are able to identify the expressions for giving permission Students are able to identify problems they listen and watch Students are able to complete a report text in form of news Students are able to answer comprehension questions related to the problems they listen/ watch Students are able to find the meaning of vocabulary items related to the problem discussed
Expressing warning: e.g. Stop illegal logging! Giving permission: e.g. No, I don’t mind. Listening passage: Flood in India (report) Video: Global warming and landslide (report
Identifying the expressions for giving permission. Listening to a report text in form of news about ‘Flood in India’ Completing a report text (news) based on the listening passage Answering comprehension questions related to the problem listened (Think pair share) Finding the meaning of vocabulary items Watching videos about ‘global warming’ and ‘landslide’ Identifying the generic structure of report text
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
132
Standard Competence (KTSP)
Basic Competence Indicators Learning Materials
Learning Experiences Evaluation Tools
Time Source
Speaking 3. Expressing meanings in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life contexts 3. Expressing meanings in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life contexts
3.1 Expressing meanings in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts involving expressions used for giving opinion and asking for opinion. 3.2 Expressing meanings in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts involving expressions used for advising, warning, and permitting
Students are able to identify the generic structure of report text Students are able to ask for group members’ opinion Students are able to express their opinion Students are able to use the expressions of asking for advice. Students are able to use the expressions of giving advice
Students are able to use the expressions of warning
Asking for opinion: e.g. What do you think about it? Giving opinion: e.g. I think it’s a good idea.
Expressing / sharing opinion (Think pair share) Prediction task: predicting what will happen if the environmental problems still persist by answering some questions Presenting the answers to the whole class Interviewing group members to ask for opinion concerning the problem discussed (Three steps interview) Three steps interview: asking for group members’ advice, giving advice, giving permission, and expressing warning toward the environmental problems discussed.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
133
Standard Competence (KTSP)
Basic Competence Indicators Learning Materials
Learning Experiences Evaluation Tools
Time Source
Unit 2 Education Listening Understanding meanings in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life contexts Understanding meanings in short functional texts and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life contexts
Responding meanings in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts involving the expressions of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Responding meanings in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately and fluently in daily life contexts in form of report, narrative, and analytical exposition texts.
Students are able to use the expressions for giving permission Students are able to identify expressions of satisfaction Students are able to identify expressions of dissatisfaction Students are able to complete report texts Students are able to answer comprehension questions related to the
Expressing satisfaction: e.g. I’m completely satisfied with ... Expressing dissatisfaction: e.g. I’m very dissatisfied with the condition
Identifying the expressions of satisfaction Identifying the expressions of dissatisfaction Completing report text ‘School’ by listening to partners dictating the words/ sentences which are missing (Creative dictation) Answering ‘True/ False’ questions Listening to listening passage about ‘education in developing countries’
Individual work Pair work Group work: Simulation task
2 x 45’
http://images.google.co.id/images?q=suasana+belajar+mengajar&btnG http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/school. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) http:www.youtube.com/watch?v=nymkp6cmc2c Look Ahead 2, Erlangga
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
134
Standard Competence (KTSP)
Basic Competence Indicators Learning Materials
Learning Experiences Evaluation Tools
Time Source
Speaking Expressing meanings in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life contexts
Expressing meanings in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts involving expressions used for expressing satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
report texts they listen Students are able to identify the generic structure of report text Students are able to mention the purpose of report text Students are able to express satisfaction Students are able to express dissatisfaction
Report texts: ‘School’ Listening passage: education in developing countries
Answering comprehension questions related to the listening passage Identifying the generic structure of report texts listened Mentioning the purpose of report text Simulation task: Expressing satisfaction/ dissatisfaction toward the quality of education Finding the solution for the problem discussed
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
135
Standard Competence (KTSP)
Basic Competence Indicators Learning Materials
Learning Experiences Evaluation Tools
Time Source
UNIT 3 Legend Listening Understanding meanings in short functional texts and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life contexts Speaking Expressing meanings in short functional texts and monolog in form of report, narrative, and
Responding meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately and fluently in daily life contexts in form of report, narrative, and analytical exposition texts Expressing meanings in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately and fluently in daily life contexts in form of report, narrative, and analytical exposition texts
Students are able to identify the generic structure of narrative text Students are able to identify the main idea from narrative text they hear Students are able to find the meaning of vocabulary items they hear Students are able to answer comprehension questions related to the story they hear Students are able to mention some examples of narrative text
The story of Mount Tangkuban Perahu The story of Mount Tangkuban Perahu
Jigsaw activity: Listening to different paragraphs of narrative ‘Mount Tangkuban Perahu’ Identifying the main idea from each paragraph of narrative text Finding the meaning of vocabulary items Identifying the generic structure of narrative Answering comprehension questions related to the listening passage (group discussion) Mentioning some examples of narrative texts Mentioning the purpose of narrative text
Individual work Pair work Group work: Simulation task
2 x 45’
http://images.google.com/images?q=Malin+Kundang&btnG=Search+Images&um=1&hl=en&sa=2 http://www.youtube.com/watch? http://images.google.com/imgres?)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
136
Standard Competence (KTSP)
Basic Competence Indicators Learning Materials
Learning Experiences Evaluation Tools
Time Source
analytical exposition in daily life contexts. UNIT 4 Pourquoi Tale Listening Understanding meanings in short functional texts and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life contexts Speaking Expressing meanings in short functional texts and monolog in form of report, narrative, and analytical exposition in
Responding meanings in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately and fluently in daily life contexts in form of report, narrative, and analytical exposition texts Expressing meanings in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately and fluently in daily life contexts in form of report, narrative, and analytical exposition texts
Students are able to complete a pourquoi text by listening to their partners Students are able to find the meaning of vocabulary items they hear Students are able to answer comprehension questions Students are able to present the answers of the comprehension questions in front of the class
Pourquoi text: Why Dogs and Cats Can’t Get Along
Retelling the whole story in front of the class in a form of presentation Creative dictation: completing the pourquoi text ‘Why Dogs and Cats Can’t Get Along’ by listening to partners Finding meaning of vocabulary items Answering comprehension questions Presenting the answers of the comprehension questions in front of the class Mentioning other examples of pourquoi tale
Individual work Group work Individual presentation
2 x 45
http://images.google.com/images?um=1&hl=id&q=cat&btnG=Cari+Gambar http://images.google.com/images?um=1&hl=id&q=dog&btnG=Cari+Gambar http://www.flint.lib.mi.us/kidsweb/PierceSarvis/Pourquoi/JeMiah%20G.shtml
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
137
Standard Competence (KTSP)
Basic Competence Indicators Learning Materials
Learning Experiences Evaluation Tools
Time Source
daily life contexts UNIT 5 Digital Library
Listening Understanding meanings in short functional texts and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life contexts
Speaking Expressing meanings in short functional texts and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context
Responding meanings in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately and fluently in daily life contexts in form of: report, narrative, and analytical exposition texts. Expressing meanings in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately and fluently in daily life contexts in form of: report, narrative, and analytical exposition texts
Students are able to mention other examples of pourquoi tale Students are able to identify the main idea of analytical exposition they hear Students are able to identify the arguments listened Students are able to express their arguments on the importance of reading
Listening passage: Why reading is important. Analytical exposition text; Why reading is important
Listening to listening passage ‘Why reading is important’ Identifying the main idea of an analytical exposition text from the listening passage Identifying the arguments from the listening passage Answering comprehension questions based on the listening passage Three steps interview: expressing arguments on the importance of reading Partner: presenting the analytical exposition text written about why reading is important.
Individual work Pair work Group work: Three steps interview Presentation
2 x 45
http://images.google.com/images?ndsp=20&um=1&hl=en&q=folktale&start=200&sa=N Look Ahead 2, Erlangga http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Librarym Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
138
Standard Competence (KTSP)
Basic Competence Indicators Learning Materials
Learning Experiences Evaluation Tools
Time Source
UNIT 6 Health Listening Understanding meanings in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life contexts.
Responding meanings in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts involving expressions used for expressing pain, relief, and pleasure.
Students are able to identify expressions of relief Students are able to identify the expressions of pain Students are able to identify the expressions of pleasure Students are able to answer comprehension questions Students are able to complete an analytical exposition text
Expressing relief: e.g. I feel so relieved Expressing pain: e.g. It hurts me so much! Expressing pleasure: e.g. It gives me great pleasure Video: Why smoking is dangerous’ Text: The danger of smoking
Watching video about ‘the danger of smoking’ Answering comprehension questions based on the video Identifying the expressions of relief Identifying the expressions of pain Identifying the expressions of pleasure Creative dictation: listening to partners dictating words/ sentences in an analytical text about ‘Why smoking is dangerous’ Completing an analytical exposition text about ‘The danger of smoking’
Individual work Pair work Group work Discussion and presentation
2 x 45
http://www.youtube.com/watch? http://www.exampleessays.com/viewpaper/58947.html http://images.google.co.id/images?gbv=2&ndsp=21&hl=id&q=smoking+people&start=84
http://res.hcpss.org/StudentDeveloped/smoking/dangers.html http://www.smokingaloud.com/death.html Look Ahead 2, Erlangga
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
139
Standard Competence (KTSP)
Basic Competence Indicators Learning Materials
Learning Experiences Evaluation Tools
Time Source
Speaking Expressing meanings in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life contexts.
Expressing meanings in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately and fluently using spoken language variety in daily life contexts involving expressions used for expressing pain, relief, and pleasure.
Students are able to use the expressions of relief Students are able to use the expressions of pain Students are able to use the expressions of pleasure Students are able to present the answers for the comprehension questions
Partner: making dialog using the expressions of pain, relief, and pleasure Discussion and presentation: presenting the answers for the comprehension questions
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
140
LESSON PLAN UNIT 1
(Meeting 1)
School : SMA Negeri 1 Depok
Subject : English (Listening and Speaking)
Topic : Report (Environment)
Time Allotment : 2 x 45’
I. Standard Competences:
Listening
Understanding meaning in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life context.
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports,
narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
Speaking Expressing meaning in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily
life context.
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
II. Basic Competences Listening
Responding meaning in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately, fluently, and acceptable using spoken language variety in daily life context involving expressions used for giving opinion and asking for opinion.
Responding meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately,
fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
Speaking Expressing meaning in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal
interpersonal discourse accurately, fluently, and acceptable using spoken language variety in daily life context involving expressions used for giving opinion and asking for opinion.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
141
Expressing meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
III. Indicators: • Identifying expressions of asking for opinion and giving opinion. (e.g. Would you please
give your opinion……?) • Identifying problems they listen and watch. • identifying the generic structure of report text.
IV. Objectives: • Students are able to identify expressions of asking for opinion and giving opinion. • Students are able to identify problems they listen and watch. • Students are able to identify the generic structure of report text.
V. Main materials: A report (news) about flood in India. Thanks for joining us today. We begin with heavy rains in eastern India have turned one village into a giant pool. Locals and the state of Behoars say, “The state government and local authorities are not doing enough to help them.”
VI. Learning Strategy:
Individual work, work in pairs and in groups, discussion, and presentation.
VII. Sources:
1. Handout and worksheet
2. News: (http:www.youtube.com/watch?)
VIII. Media:
Handouts, CD, computer, and speakers.
IX. Learning Activities :
Activities Time
Greeting and opening
Pre-activities
Think pair share:
• Students look at some pictures then answer questions by giving
their opinion based on the pictures silently.
1’
10’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
142
Activities Time
• Students exchange their ideas (answers) with their partners, then to
other pairs.
Discussing students’ answers (students’ opinion)
Vocabulary building: students find the meaning of some vocabulary
items.
Whilst activities
Students listen to news (report) and fill in the missing words.
Discuss students’ answers.
Students listen to the news (report) for the second time for checking their
answers.
Think pair share:
• Students answer some comprehension questions related to the
news they hear silently.
• Students exchange their ideas (answers) with their partners, then to
other pairs.
Discuss students’ answers (opinion) on the problem discussed.
Presentation:
• Students work with their partner to answer some questions related
to the problem discussed.
• Each pair presents the answers to the whole class.
• Other pairs give response to the presenters’ answers.
Post - activity
Reviewing today’s material
5’
9’
10’
5’
5’
15’
8’
20’
2’
90’
X. Evaluation
Pair work: presentation (mentioning and explaining several kinds of disasters caused by human
and kinds of disasters which occur naturally)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
143
LESSON PLAN UNIT 1
(Meeting 2)
School : SMA Negeri 1 Depok
Subject : English (Listening and Speaking)
Topic : Report (Environment)
Time Allotment : 2 x 45’
I. Standard Competences: Listening
Understanding meaning in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life context.
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports,
narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
Speaking Expressing meaning in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily
life context.
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
II. Basic Competences Listening
Responding meaning in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately, fluently, and acceptable using spoken language variety in daily life context involving expressions used for advising, warning, and permitting.
Speaking
Expressing meaning in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately, fluently, and acceptable using spoken language variety in daily life context involving expressions used for advising, warning, and permitting.
III. Indicators: 1. Identifying the expressions of asking for advice (e.g. Do you have any advice for ……)
and giving advice (e.g. I advise you to ….. )
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
144
2. Identifying the expressions of warning (e.g. No littering). 3. Using the expressions of asking for advice and giving advice. 4. Using the expressions of warning.
IV. Objectives:
1. Students are able to identify expressions of asking for advice and giving advice. 2. Students are able to identify expressions of warning. 3. Students are able to use the expressions of asking for advice and giving advice. 4. Students are able to use the expressions of warning.
V. Main Materials: Videos on global warming and landslide. VI. Learning Strategy: Work in pairs and in groups, discussion VII. Sources:
1. Handout and worksheet
2. Videos: (http:www.youtube.com/watch?)
VIII. Media:
Handouts, CD, computer, and speakers.
IX. Learning Activities :
Activities Time
Greeting and opening
Pre-activity
Reviewing previous material.
Whilst activities
Prediction task:
• Students listen and watch to part of videos about global warming and
landslide.
• Students work in pairs telling each other what they predict will
happen at each stage based on part of videos they watched.
1’
4’
4’
5’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
145
Activities Time
• Students answer some questions to help them make prediction.
• Students listen and watch the next part of videos to check their
prediction.
• Think pair share:
• Students work in pairs to answer some comprehension questions
silently.
• Students exchange their ideas (answers) with their partners, then to
other pairs.
Discuss students’ answers (opinion) on the problem discussed.
Teacher explains some expressions used to ask for opinion and give opinion.
Teacher explains some expressions used to ask for advice and give advice.
Teacher explains some expressions used to warn people.
Three steps interview:
• Students work in groups, each member of a group chooses another
member from different group to be a partner.
• Students interview their partners by asking some questions (opinion)
related to the environmental problems discussed.
• Students ask their partners to give some advice and warning to
overcome the environmental problems discussed.
• Students share their partners’ responses to their team members.
Post - activity
Three minutes review: Teacher gives three minutes for each group to review
what their group members have shared.
Students write down the expressions of asking for opinion and giving opinion
they use for interviewing their partners.
10’
5’
15’
10’
4’
4’
4’
20’
3’
1’
X. Evaluation
Group work: Three steps interview (e.g. What do you think about the causes of global warming?)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
146
LESSON PLAN UNIT 2
School : SMA Negeri 1 Depok
Subject : English (Listening and Speaking)
Topic : Report (Education)
Time Allotment : 2 x 45’
I. Standard Competences:
Listening
Understanding meaning in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life context.
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports,
narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
Speaking Expressing meaning in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily
life context.
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
II. Basic Competences Listening
Responding meaning in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately, fluently, and acceptable using spoken language variety in daily life context involving expressions used for expressing satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
Responding meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately,
fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
Speaking Expressing meaning in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal
interpersonal discourse accurately, fluently, and acceptable using spoken language variety in daily life context involving expressions used for expressing satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
147
Expressing meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
III. Indicators: • Identifying expressions of satisfaction. (e.g. It was satisfactory) and dissatisfaction (e.g. I
want to make a complaint) • Identifying the generic structures of report text.
IV. Objectives: • Students are able to identify expressions of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. • Students are able to identify the generic structure of report text.
V. Main materials:
• A report (School). A school (from Greek scholeion) is an institution designed to allow and encourage students to learn, under the supervision of teachers. Most countries have systems of formal education, which is commonly compulsory.
• A report (Education) I think first world countries for developed nations need to be more responsible for developing nations such as Africa, India, Indonesia. VI. Learning Strategy:
Individual work, work in pairs and in groups, discussion, and simulation
VII. Sources:
1. Handout and worksheet
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/school.Wikipedia.the free encyclopedia
VIII. Media:
Handouts, CD, computer, and speakers.
IX. Learning Activities :
Activities Time
Greeting and opening
1’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
148
Activities Time
Pre-activities
Think pair share:
• Students look at some pictures then answer questions silently.
• Students exchange their ideas (answers) with their partners, then to
other pairs.
Discussing students’ answers (students’ opinion)
Whilst activities
Creative dictation: students work in pairs, each pair dictates a written text
about ‘school’ to complete all the gaps in the paragraph.
Discussing the answers
Students answer ‘True/ False’ questions.
Students listen to a listening passage about ‘education in developing
countries’ then fill in the missing words.
Students answer several questions based on the listening passage.
Discussing the answers.
Students do simulation task to express satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
Post - activity
Three minutes review
5’
4’
15’
5’
10’
15’
10’
5’
17’
3’
X. Evaluation
Simulation task: Could you recommend the best solution to overcome the educational problem in
this country?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
149
LESSON PLAN UNIT 3
School : SMA Negeri 1 Depok
Subject : English (Listening and Speaking)
Topic : Narrative (Legend)
Time Allotment : 2 x 45’
I. Standard Competences:
Listening
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
Speaking
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
II. Basic Competences Listening
Responding meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
Speaking
Expressing meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
III. Indicators:
• Identifying the generic structure of a narrative text. • Identifying the main idea of narrative text. • Answering comprehension questions related to the story they hear.
IV. Objectives: • Students are able to identify the generic structure of narrative text. • Students are able to identify the main idea of narrative text. • Students are able to answer comprehension questions related to the story they hear.
V. Main materials: Listening passage of narrative text (legend) entitles Mount Tangkuban Perahu. Dayang Sumbi was a girl from West Java. She was beautiful, smart, and clever. Her intelligence made the prince from Kahyangan kingdom fell in love with her and married her.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
150
VI. Learning Strategy:
Individual work, work in pairs and in groups, discussion, and presentation.
VII. Sources:
1. Handout and worksheet
2. Listening passage (Mount Tankuban Perahu): (http:www.youtube.com/watch?)
VIII. Media:
Handouts, CD, computer, and speakers.
IX. Learning Activities :
Activities Time
Greeting and opening
Pre-activities
Think pair share:
• Students look at some pictures then answer some questions
• Students exchange their ideas (answers) with their partners, then
to other pairs.
Discussing students’ answers
Whilst activities
Jigsaw activity: students listen to different part of a complete narrative
text.
Group discussion: Students report what they hear from the listening
passage to other members in their group.
Group discussion: students arrange some jumbled pictures and sentences
about the narrative text they hear, then write the whole text.
1’
5’
4’
15’
10’
20’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
151
Activities Time
Students find the meaning of some vocabulary items.
Students answer some questions based on the narrative text they listened.
Discuss students’ answers (opinion) on the problem discussed.
Presentation:
• Students present the whole narrative text they have listened in
front of the class.
Post - activity
Reviewing today’s material
5’
9’
5’
15’
1’
90’
X. Evaluation
Pair work: presentation (presenting the whole narrative text)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
152
LESSON PLAN UNIT 4
School : SMA Negeri 1 Depok
Subject : English (Listening and Speaking)
Topic : Narrative (Pourquoi tale)
Time Allotment : 2 x 45’
I. Standard Competences:
Listening
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
Speaking
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
II. Basic Competences Listening
Responding meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
Speaking
Expressing meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
III. Indicators:
• Identifying the generic structure of a narrative text. • Identifying the main idea of narrative text. • Answering comprehension questions related to the story they hear.
IV. Objectives: • Students are able to identify the generic structure of narrative text. • Students are able to identify the main idea of narrative text. • Students are able to answer comprehension questions related to the story they hear.
V. Main materials: Narrative text (Pourquoi tale) entitles Why dogs and cats can’t get along. Long, long ago dogs and cats were very good friends. They played games like hide-and-go seek, fetch, and chase the tail. But times changed and soon they were no longer friends.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
153
VI. Learning Strategy:
Individual work, work in pairs and in groups, discussion, and presentation.
VII. Sources:
1. Handout and worksheet
2. http: //www.flint.lib.mi.us/kidsweb/PierceSarvis/Pourquoi/JeMiah%20G.shtml
VIII. Media:
Handouts, CD, computer, and speakers.
IX. Learning Activities :
Activities Time
Greeting and opening
Pre-activities
Students look at two pictures then answer several questions.
Whilst activities
Students find the meaning of vocabulary items.
Creative dictation: students work in pairs, each pair dictates a written
text of pourquoi tale to complete all the gaps in the paragraph.
Partner: students answer several questions in pairs
Discuss students’ answers
Presentation:
• Students present the answers in front of the class.
Post - activity
Students find other examples of pourquoi tale for their homework
Reviewing today’s material
1’
9’
10’
25’
15’
10’
20’
1’
90’
X. Evaluation
Pair work: presentation (presenting the whole narrative text)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
154
LESSON PLAN UNIT 5
School : SMA Negeri 1 Depok
Subject : English (Listening and Speaking)
Topic : Analytical exposition (Digital Library)
Time Allotment : 2 x 45’
I. Standard Competences:
Listening
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
Speaking
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
II. Basic Competences Listening
Responding meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
Speaking
Expressing meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
III. Indicators: • Identifying the generic structures of analytical exposition text. • Identifying the main idea of analytical exposition text. • Answering comprehension questions based on the listening passage.
IV. Objectives: • Students are able to identify the generic structure of analytical exposition text. • Students are able to identify the main idea of analytical exposition text. • Students are able to answer comprehension questions based on the listening passage.
V. Main materials:
• An analytical exposition text (Digital library).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
155
A digital library is a library in which collections are stored in digital formats (as opposed to print, microform, or other media) and accessible by computers.
• An analytical exposition text (Why reading is important) I think reading is important because it gives you knowledge of many different things. I
think that reading is fun because you read different kinds of things that can help you in your future. VI. Learning Strategy:
Individual work, work in pairs and in groups, discussion, and presentation.
VII. Sources:
1. Handout and worksheet
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Librarym.Wikipedia.the free encyclopedia
VIII. Media:
Handouts, CD, computer, and speakers.
IX. Learning Activities :
Activities Time
Greeting and opening
Pre-activities
Students look at a picture (library) then read a text about digital library.
Whilst activities
Partner: students answer comprehension questions in pairs.
Discussing students’ answers (students’ opinion)
Students listen to a listening passage about ‘why reading is important’
Students answer several questions based on the listening passage.
Discussing the answers.
1’
4’
10’
5’
5’
10’
7’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
156
Activities Time
Students read an analytical exposition text ‘why reading is important’
Students do ‘three-steps interview.
Students write an analytical exposition text about ‘the importance of
reading’
Students present the text in front of the class.
Post - activity
Three minutes review
5’
13’
14’
13’
3’
X. Evaluation
Three-steps interview (Why reading is important?)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
157
LESSON PLAN UNIT 6
School : SMA Negeri 1 Depok
Subject : English (Listening and Speaking)
Topic : Analytical exposition (Health)
Time Allotment : 2 x 45’
I. Standard Competences:
Listening
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
Understanding meaning in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life context.
Speaking
Understanding meaning in short functional text and monolog in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life context.
Expressing meaning in sustained transactional and formal interpersonal discourse in daily life context.
II. Basic Competences Listening
Responding meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
Responding meaning in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately, fluently, and acceptable using spoken language variety in daily life context involving expressions used for expressing relief, pain, and pleasure.
Speaking
Expressing meaning in monolog texts using spoken language variety accurately, fluently, and acceptable in daily life context in form of reports, narrative, and analytical exposition.
Expressing meaning in sustained transactional (to get things done) and formal interpersonal discourse accurately, fluently, and acceptable using spoken language variety in daily life context involving expressions used for expressing relief, pain, and pleasure.
III. Indicators: • Identifying the main idea of analytical exposition text. • Answering comprehension questions based on the listening passage.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
158
• Expressing relief, pain, and pleasure. IV. Objectives: • Students are able to identify the main idea of analytical exposition text. • Students are able to answer comprehension questions based on the listening passage. • Students are able to express relief, pain, and pleasure.
V. Main materials:
• A video (The danger of smoking). VI. Learning Strategy:
Individual work, work in pairs and in groups, discussion, and presentation.
VII. Sources:
Handout and worksheet
VIII. Media:
Handouts, CD, computer, and speakers.
IX. Learning Activities :
Activities Time
Greeting and opening
Pre-activities
Students look at a picture (library) then read a text about digital library.
Whilst activities
Partner: students answer comprehension questions in pairs.
Discussing students’ answers (students’ opinion)
Students listen to a listening passage about ‘why reading is important’
Students answer several questions based on the listening passage.
Discussing the answers
1’
4’
10’
5’
5’
10’
7’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
159
Activities Time
Students read an analytical exposition text ‘why reading is important’
Students do ‘three-step interview.
Students write an analytical exposition text about ‘the importance of reading’
Students present the text in front of the class.
Post - activity
Three minutes review
5’
13’
14’
13’
3’
X. Evaluation
Three-step interview (Why reading is important?)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
APPENDIX 8
PRESENTATION OF THE DESIGNED MATERIALS
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
UNIT 1
Look at these following pictures!
(Pictures taken from: http://images.google.co.id/images)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2
Activity 1: Think pair share
Instructions:
Work in pairs! Each student answers the questions silently.
Next, exchange your ideas and thoughts with your partner.
Finally, your partner shares your responses with other pairs.
Answer these following questions silently!
1. What is your opinion on the cases that are illustrated on the pictures
above?
2. What do you think about the main causes of each case illustrated in
the pictures above?
3. What do you think about the best solution to overcome those
environmental problems?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
3
Activity 2: Vocabulary building Find the meaning of these following vocabulary items!
Vocabulary Meaning
1. Illegal logging ( j )
a. Flooded
2. Destruction
b. Mud slide
3. Resident
c. Damage
4. Garbage
d. Gloomy
5. Grim
e. rise
6. Landslide
f. epidemic
7. Monsoon
g. rubbish
8. Inundated
h. inhabitant
9. Ascent
i. belongings
10. Properties
j. Cutting down the tress for timber illegally
11. Outbreak
k. Torrential rain
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4
Activity: Individual work Listening 1 Listen and fill in the missing words of the listening passage below!
News broadcaster: Thanks for joining us today. We begin with
heavy rains in eastern ……(1)….. have turned one village into a giant
pool. Locals and the state of Behoars say, “The state government and
local ………(2)……. are not doing enough to help them.” Here’s more
on their situation.
“The flood water have ……(3)… several major roads covering
transport into Chaos. Local site is making a mockery of the Monsoon
preparation climes made by the ……(4)………. government and local
authorities.
For the last eight to ten days, we have been surrounded with
water. They say that the government has sent some helps. But then, all
situation is not ………(5)…. This happens every year, and every year
they say that the ………(6)……. have been given, but these people eat
away all of it, and we remain in this flood like situation. There is nothing
to eat also. Resident also ……(7).. a possible outbreak of water-born
diseases.
Local said the situation is grim but necessary ascent for
……(8)….. becoming scares.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5
The road is up merge. The entire village is ……(9)….. People
cannot communicate. Goods and materials cannot be brought here.
And no government help is reached here until now.
The flood has damaged standing …(10)…… houses, and other
property. Every year the Monsoon rains leave a trial of death and
destruction across South Asia.
Source: http.www.youtube.com/watch?
Listening 2 Activity 1: Prediction Task (Teacher plays the video then pauses it to give students opportunity to predict what will
happen at each stage based on the environmental problems they watch).
Instructions:
Watch and listen to the video of global warming and landslide.
Work in pairs, tell each other what you predict will happen at each stage
based on part of video showing environmental problems you watch!
Answer the questions on the following page to help you make predictions!
Then, watch the next part to check your predictions!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6
Answer these following questions to help you make prediction!
1. What will happen in the future if this air pollution problem still persists? 2. What will happen if people keep on cutting down the trees illegally?
Video 1
Listening source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?, July 29, 2008 Picture: http://images.google.co.id/images? Video 2
Source: http://images.google.co.id/images? Listening source: http:www.youtube.com
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
7
Activity 2: Think pair share
Instructions:
Work in pairs! After watching and listening to the video of global warming
and landslide, answer the questions below!
Each student answers the questions silently.
Next, exchange your ideas and thoughts with your partner.
Finally, your partner shares your responses with other pairs.
Answer these following questions!
1. What is your opinion on the cases (global warming and landslide) as
illustrated in the videos? 2. Are those environmental cases caused by human? Or, do they occur
naturally? Explain your answers.
3. What do you think the best solution to overcome those environmental
problems?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
8
Instructions:
Study these expressions of asking for opinion, giving opinion, asking
for advice, giving advice, and warning!
Asking for opinion
Giving opinion
What do you think about ______?
What is your opinion about ____?
Do you think that ____________?
Would you share your opinion on
_________?
Would you please give your
opinion?
Well, I think ___________
In my opinion, _________
Yes, I think ___________
From my point of view,
___________________
Asking for advice Giving advice
Do you have any recommendation
about ______________________
Do you have any advice for _____
Do you have any ideas about ___
Can you recommend better
solution?
I recommend that ______
I advise you to _________
It would be a good idea to
_____________________
My recommendation is
that _________________
Warning
No littering!
Stop illegal logging!
No smoking! Source: Look Ahead 2, Erlangga
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
9
Activity 1: Think pair share
Instructions:
Each student answers the questions silently.
Next, exchange your ideas and thoughts with your partner.
Finally, your partner shares your responses with other pairs.
Answer these following questions silently!
1. What is the cause of the flood disaster which occurs in India?
2. What are the effects of the flood disaster?
3. Do the government and local authorities do enough to help the victims?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
10
Activity 2: Presentation
Instructions:
Work with your partner.
Answer the questions below, then present your answers to the whole class. (The
listeners give responses to the presenters’ answers.)
Answer these following questions! 1. Find several kinds of disasters caused by human!
2. Find several kinds of disasters which occur naturally!
3. What do you think the best solution to solve those environmental
problems?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11
Activity 3: Three - Steps Interview
Instructions:
Work in group of four students! (Each member of a team chooses another
member from different group to be a partner!)
First, interview your partner by asking clarifying questions about the
environmental cases you have listened and watched! (e.g. What do you
think about the causes of global warming?)
Second, ask your partner to give his/her advice and warning to overcome
those environmental problems. Next, reverse the roles!
Finally, share your partner’s responses to your team members! (You may
use the environmental terms stated in the ‘vocabulary building’ above)
Activity: Three minutes review
Instructions:
Teacher gives three minutes for the teams to review what their team
members’ have shared.
Write down the expressions of asking for opinion and giving opinion you use
for interviewing your partners!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
12
UNIT 2
Activity: Think Pair Share
Instructions:
Work in pairs! Look at the pictures below!
Each student answers the questions on the following page silently!
Next, exchange your thoughts with your partner!
Finally, your partner shares your responses with other pairs.
Source: http://images.google.co.id/images?q=suasana+belajar+mengajar&btnG
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
13
Answer these following questions!
1. What activities are illustrated in the pictures on page 12? 2. Where do the activities (as illustrated in the pictures on page 12) take
place?
Activity 1: Creative Dictation
Instructions:
Work in pairs as student A and student B! Student A is given a written text that
contains words or lines that are missing from student B’s text and vice versa.
Each pair takes turns to dictate each other the parts of the text they have in
their handouts.
Continue dictating to each other until they have completed all the gaps in the
text.
Combine each text into a whole text then do the ‘Task’ section!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
14
Text for student B
A school (from Greek scholeion) is an _______________ designed
___________________ students to learn, under the ____________ of
teachers. Most countries have ____________________ which is commonly
_____________________ in these systems, students ______________
through a series of schools. The names for these schools ______________
by country, but generally include ___________________ and secondary
school for ____________________ who have completed primary education.
In addition to these_________________, students in a given country may
also have access to and ____________________ both before and after
primary and secondary education.
Text for student A
Kindergarten or _______________ provide some to very young
children (typically ages 3-5). University, _______________ or seminary may
be available after secondary school. A school may also be
_________________ to one particular field, such as a _____________ or a
school of dance. __________________ schools may provide
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
15
_______________ curriculum and __________________. There are also
________________ schools, called _________________. Private schools
may be for children with _________________ when the government does not
supply for them; ______________ such as Christian Schools, Khalsa
Schools, Torah Schools and others; or schools that have
_________________ or seek to foster other personal achievements. In
______________________ teaching and learning take place outside of a
______________________ school building.
(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/school. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
TASK
Activity 2: Individual work
Circle ‘True’ if the statement is correct and circle ‘False’ if the statement is incorrect.
1. [True] [False] The word ‘school’ is derived from English which means an
institution designed to allow and encourage students to
learn, under the supervision of teachers.
2. [True] [False] In formal education systems, students progress through a
series of schools.
3. [True] [False] Secondary school is for teenagers who have completed
primary education.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
16
4. [True] [False] Kindergarten or pre-school is provided for young children
who are typically at the age of five to six years old.
5. [True] [False] In home schooling and online schools, teaching and learning
take place inside of a traditional school building.
Activity 3: Individual Work
Instructions:
Listen and fill in the missing words of the listening passage below!
Then, answer the comprehension questions!
I think first world countries for ……(1).. nations need to be more
responsible for developing nations such as Africa, India, Indonesia. These
(2)……. have very large populations. In Indonesia, there are near somewhere
around ……(3)… million people. And if we don’t do something about
standardtive education here, that’s going to be a much ……(4)….. problem
than your ……(5)…. global warming and the other affects the globe. I think I
first wrote first world …(6)…… need to get more involved in education, not
just in term of funds, but also in ………(7)…. of knowledge.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
17
We need to …(8)…….. our brothers and sisters in these developing nations
about how to improve their standard of living and how to help take care the
planet.
(Listening source: http:www.youtube.com/watch?v=nymkp6cmc2c)
Answer these comprehension questions!
1. What countries are included as developing countries as mentioned by
the speaker?
2. What should the developed nations do toward the developing nations
like Africa, India, and Indonesia?
3. What can you conclude from the listening text above!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
Instructions:
Study the expressions of expressing satisfaction and dissatisfaction!
Asking about satisfaction/ dissatisfaction Are you satisfied with something?
Was something not to your
satisfaction?
Is everything satisfactory?
Expressing satisfaction I’m completely satisfied
with ...
It was satisfactory.
Good enough.
Everything is fine, thank
you.
Everything was just
perfect.
It was okay.
Expressing dissatisfaction I am little dissatisfied
with the service here.
I am a bit disappointed
with the program.
I’m very dissatisfied with
the condition.
I want to make a
complaint.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
19
Activity: Simulation Task
Instructions:
Work in small groups consisting of four students. Student A plays role as a
minister of education, student B and C as the audience in the ‘Talk show’, and
student D as the presenter.
Act out the ‘Talk show’ program then discuss the educational problem in
developing countries, specifically in your country, as you have watched and
listened from the video.
Use these following guidelines to do the simulation! Student D (presenter) : Greets the audience, introduces the guest (the
minister of (education), then tells the problem
to discuss.
Student B and C (audience) : ask as many questions as possible to the
minister of education (student A) about the
educational problem discussed.
Student A (minister of education) : answers the audience’s questions then
explains the solution for the problem
discussed.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
20
Study these following examples of questions and answers to do the simulation task!
What do you think about the quality of education in this country?
Do you feel satisfied with the educational system in this country? Give
your reason!
Could you recommend the best solution to overcome the educational
problem in this country?
My recommendation is that we should improve our educational system
in our country.
Activity: Three minutes review
Instructions:
Teacher gives three minutes for each group to find the solution for the
educational problem discussed.
Then, each group asks one of its members to share the solution to the whole
class.
Write down the expressions of asking about satisfaction/ dissatisfaction you
use for interviewing your partners!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21
UNIT 3
Look at this following picture!
Pictures: http://images.google.com/images?um=1&hl=id&q=cat&btnG=Cari+Gambar
Activity: Think pair share
Instructions:
Work in pairs. Look at the picture above which represents a popular narrative story
from West Sumatra. Then, answer the questions on the following page silently!
Exchange your answers with your partner, and then share your answers to other
pairs.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
22
Answer these following questions! 1. What story is represented by the picture above?
2. Can you tell the story briefly?
Activity: Jigsaw Activity
Instructions:
Work in groups of four students. Each member of groups will listen to different
part of a complete narrative text. Try to remember the main points of what you
have listened!
While waiting for your turn to listen to the part of the listening passage, do the
vocabulary matching task!
After you have listened to each part of the narrative text, report what you
remember to other members in your groups!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
TASK Match the vocabulary items in the left column with their synonyms stated in the right column!
Vocabulary Meaning
1. intelligence (b) a. sentence
2. punishment b. aptitude
3. obedient c. understand
4. gold d. respectful
5. struck e. know
6. anger f. please
7. granted g. rage
8. external h. strike
9. exile i. everlasting
10. recognize j. decided
11. realize k. banish
Activity 1: Group Discussion Instructions:
Arrange the jumbled pictures and sentences! Next, write the paragraphs you
have listened into a meaningful narrative text!
Explain the generic structure of the paragraphs you have arranged!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
24
Arranged these jumbled pictures!
a. The king turned the prince into a dog e. Sangkuriang grew up to be
an obedient boy
b. Everyday he would hunt for food f. He kicked the large boat
c. Dayang Sumbi asked him to build g. Dayang Sumbi struck a dam Sangkuriang’s head
d. The boat landed up side down h. She was beautiful and clever
(Pictures: http://images.google.com/imgres?)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25
Write the paragraphs you have listened into a meaningful narrative text!
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Answer these following questions based on the paragraphs you have arranged!
1. Why did the king from kahyangan kingdom turn the prince into a
dog?
2. What did Sangkuriang do to find some food for his family?
3. What made Dayang Sumbi recognize that Sangkuriang was her son?
4. What did Dayang Sumbi do to prevent her marriage?
5. What can you learn from the story above?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
Activity 3: Presentation
Instructions:
Present the whole text you have written orally to the other groups in front of
the class!
Then, discuss the answers from the questions above!
Activity: Three minutes review
Instructions:
Teacher gives three minutes for the teams to review what their team members’
have shared
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
UNIT 4
Look at these following pictures. Then, answer the questions orally.
Pictures
Pictures: http://images.google.com/images?um=1&hl=id&q=cat&btnG=Cari+Gambar Answer these following questions!
1. What do you know about those animals? 2. Do they get along well?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
Activity: Vocabulary Building Find the meaning of these following vocabulary items!
Vocabulary Meaning
1. tired a. disregard
2. realize b. take care
3. disrespect c. exhausted
4. treat d. quarrel
5. argue e. recognize
Activity 1: Creative Dictation
Instructions:
Work in pairs as student A and student B. Student A is given a written text of
pourquoi tale that contains words or lines that are missing from student B’s text
and vice versa.
Each pair takes turns to dictate each other the parts of the text they have in
their handouts.
Continue dictating to each other until they have completed all the gaps in the
text.
Combine each text into a whole text then answer the questions!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
Why Dogs and Cats Can’t Get Along JeMiah
Text A (Student A)
Long, long ago _______________ were very good friends. They
_____________. like hide-and-go seek, fetch, and chase the tail. But
times changed and soon they were no longer friends.
Do you want to know what happened? In this story you will
____________ why dogs and cats can’t ______________ anymore.
It all started ______________. with a dog named ___________. and a cat
named _____________. Perro and Gato played together every day,
every hour, and every minute until one day, Perro and Gato just
_______________ They used to think they were the same species, but
suddenly realized that they were ________________.
“ _____________________________________ ” said Pero.
“What are you talking about? It’s you who has been _______________
me disrespectfully.”
“_____________________________,” replied Gato. So Perro and Gato kept
arguing back and forth, back and forth.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
Text B (Student B)
____________________________ Every time Gato came his way,
Pero went the other way.
Clickety clack…smash…clack..click…clackety….clickety.
Perro, the dog, got tired of Gato’s meows and hairballs,
__________________________.“ Ruff, ruff, ruff, that’s all you do.
_____________________?” said Gato _________________
“Meow, meow, meow, you can’t tell me to ______________, because
you’re meow, meowing yourself.”
“_______________________,” Gato and Perro said at the same time.
So now you know that ______________________, cats hate the sound;
and whenever ___________________________
Now you know the true story of why cats and dogs don’t get along.
Source: http://www.flint.lib.mi.us/kidsweb
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
Activity 2: Partner Answer these following questions with your partner!
1. Where did the story take place?
2. Who were the characters of the story above?
3. How was the relationship between cats and dogs in the past?
4. Why could not the dogs and cats get along anymore?
5. Does the story end in a happy or sad ending?
6. What can you learn from the story above?
7. What kind of text is it? What is the purpose of the text?
8. Explain the generic structures of the text!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
32
Activity: Presentation
Instructions:
Work with your partner.
Present your answers to the whole class. (The listeners give response to the
presenters’ answers.)
Activity: Partner TASK
Find other examples of pourquoi tale from international network or
other sources, then tell it to your partner!
Picture: http://images.google.com/images
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
33
UNIT 5
Instructions:
Look at these following pictures. Then, read the explanation about library.
Next, discuss with your partner to answer the questions.
Look at these following pictures!
Picture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Librarym Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
34
A digital library is a library in which collections are stored in digital
formats (as opposed to print, microform, or other media) and
accessible by computers. The digital content may be stored locally, or
accessed remotely via computer networks. A digital library is a type of
information retrieval system.
The first use of the term digital library in print may have been in a
1988 report to the Corporation for National Research Initiatives. The
term digital libraries was first popularized by the NSF/DARPA/NASA.
Digital Libraries Initiative in 1994.The older names electronic library or
virtual library are also occasionally used, though electronic library
nowadays more often refers to portal, often provided by government
agencies, as in the case of the Florida Electronic Library.
(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Librarym Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
35
Activity: Partner
Answer these following questions in pairs!
1. What do you know about digital library?
2. Have you ever made use of digital library?
3. What are the advantages of making use of digital library?
4. Do you like reading? Give your reasons!
5. Do you think that reading is important? Give your reasons!
Activity 1
Instructions:
Listen to the listening passage about ‘Why reading is important’!
Then, answer the question!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
36
Answer this following question:
Why does the speaker like reading books?
Activity 2
Instructions:
• Read this example of an analytical exposition text!
• Do the ‘Three steps interview’ by referring to this following example of an
analytical exposition text.
Why reading is important I think reading is important because it gives you knowledge of many
different things. I think that reading is fun because you read different kinds of
things that can help you in your future. Reading gives you knowledge of all
things because in the schoolbooks you can find everything you used to learn
how to read and write.
The only thing I can say to a non-reader is to start reading because in
your future it will help you out.
Source: http://www.exampleessays.com/viewpaper/58947.html
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
Activity 1: Three Steps Interview
Instructions:
Work in group of four students.
Each member of a team chooses another member from different group
to be a partner!
First, interview your partner by asking questions about the importance
of reading! (e.g. Why reading is important? What do you get from
reading books, novels, articles, and so on)
Second, ask your partner to share their reading interest.
Next, reverse the roles!
Finally, share your partner’s responses to your team members!
Activity 2: Partner and Presentation
Instructions:
Write a short analytical exposition about ‘the importance of reading’ with your
partner!
Next, present it to the whole class.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
38
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Activity: Three minutes review
Instruction:
Teacher gives three minutes for the teams to review what their team members’
have shared.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
UNIT 6
Activity: Think pair share
Instructions:
Work in pairs! Look at the pictures below!
Each student answers the questions silently!
Next, exchange your ideas and thoughts with your partner!
Finally, your partner shares your responses with other pairs.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
Pictures:http://images.google.co.id/images? Answer these following questions!
1. What is your opinion on the habits as illustrated in the pictures on page
38?
2. What are the dangers of smoking?
3. Share your opinion with your partners!
Activity 1
Instructions:
Watch and listen to the video about ‘The danger of smoking’!
Then, answer the questions!
Finally, underline the new vocabulary items stated in the text and find their
meanings in Indonesian language!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
Pictures:http://images.google.co.id/images? Activity 2: Creative Dictation
Instructions:
Work with your partner! Student A is given parts of an analytical exposition
text that contains words or lines that are missing from student B’s text and
vice versa.
Each pair takes turns to dictate each other the parts of the text they have
in their handouts.
Continue dictating to each other until they have completed all the gaps in
the text.
Text A
Smoking is the one of the main cause of …1… every year.
Smoking cause number of smoke related diseases such as ……2.. ,
respiratory problems, and …3…… ailments. These dangers of smoking
are increasing yearly.
Certain ……4…… disabilities are also the dangers of smoking. It
could also result in a decreased capability to enjoy ………5…….
capabilities because of the ailment or side effects like breathing
problems. Smoking leads to reduction in …6……… expectancy.
Over the years a …7…… will be more likely to develop
respiratory ailments, thickening of the arteries, blood clots, cancer of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
the lung, cervix, larynx, …8……, esophagus, bladder, pancreas, and
kidney, and emphysema, as well as exhibit ……9… such as reduced
stamina, poor athletic performance, wheezing, …10…… , dizziness,
and nausea.
Text B
In time, a smoker ……1….. increased resistance to the flow of air
into the …2……. and reduced lung capacity. Besides these serious
problems, prolonged ………3…. use leads to stained teeth and fingers
and bad breath. Even a smoker's ………4…… and living quarters tend
to smell of tobacco.
Another one of the ………5………… of the smoking is that
smoking not only …………6……. the health of the smokers but also
diminishes the ……7….. of the …………8………… around him through
secondhand smoking.
Thus ………9………. is harmful to health than the most people
are aware about the ……10……. of cigarette smoking.
Source:http://res.hcpss.org/StudentDeveloped/smoking/dangers.html)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
Instructions:
Study the expressions for expressing relief, pain, and pleasure!
Source: Look Ahead 2,Erlangga
Expressing relief:
• I feel so relieved
• I’m glad everything is
running well.
• What a relief!
• Thank God for that.
• Oh, that’s a relief.
• Good for you.
Expressing pain:
• Ouch! It hurts me so
much.
• Ooh! My head aches!
And my back hurts!
• Ouch! That hurts!
• Aw! The pain hurts me
very much.
• It’s very painful. I
can’t stand it.
Expressing pleasure/ pleased:
• I’m very pleased with
this room.
• Oh, how marvelous.
• Oh, it’s wonderful.
• It’s good news.
• It gives me great
pleasure.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
44
Activity 1: Discussion
Instructions:
Work in groups of four students.
Discuss and answer the questions!
Answer these following questions! 1. Mention the dangers of smoking?
2. What are the dangers of smoking for ‘passive smoker’?
3. What will you do to avoid the dangers of smoking?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
45
Picture: http://www.smokingaloud.com/death.html
Activity 2: Presentation
Instruction:
Present the result of the discussion to the whole class. (The listeners give
responses to the presenters’ answers.)
Activity: Partner
Instruction:
• Create a dialog based on the situation and practice it with your partner!
1. You want to go to the hospital because you have severe
stomachache.
2. You feel relief because you have passed your final examination.
3. You feel happy since you won a speech contest.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI