The Research Paradigm: Scientific Agenda Valerie Odero-Marah , PhD
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI - core.ac.uk · antisosial, egois, cepat marah, dominan,...
Transcript of PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI - core.ac.uk · antisosial, egois, cepat marah, dominan,...
A PSYCHOANALYTICAL STUDY ON MICHAEL SWANGO’S
PSYCHOPATH IN JAMES STEWART’S BLIND EYE
AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra
in English Letters
By:
DIAN PURNAMASARI
Student Number: 114214038
ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS
FACULTY OF LETTERS
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2015
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ii
A PSYCHOANALYTICAL STUDY ON MICHAEL SWANGO’S
PSYCHOPATH IN JAMES STEWART’S BLIND EYE
AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS
Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra
in English Letters
By
Dian Purnamasari
Student Number: 114214038
ENGLISH LETTER STUDY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS
FACULTY OF LETTERS
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2015
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
v
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN
PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini, saya mahasiswa Universitas Sanata Dharma:
Nama : Dian Purnamasari
Nomor Mahasiswa : 114214038
Demi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan
Universitas Sanata Dharma karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul:
A PSYCHOANALYTICAL STUDY ON MICHAEL SWANGO’S
PSYCHOPATH IN JAMES STEWART’S BLIND EYE
Beserta perangkat yang diperlukan (bila ada). Dengan demikian saya memberikan
kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma hak menyimpan, mengalihkan
dalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya dalam bentuk pangkalan data,
mendistribusikan secara terbatas, dan mempublikasikannya di Internet atau media
lain untuk kepentingan akademis tanpa perlu meminta ijin dari saya maupun
memberikan royalty kepada saya selama tetap mencantumkan nama saya sebagai
penulis.
Demikian pernyataan ini yang saya buat dengan sebenarnya,
Dibuat di Yogyakarta
Pada tanggal : 30 June, 2015
Yang menyatakan
(Dian Purnamasari)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vi
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY
I certify that this undergraduate thesis contains no material which has been previously
submitted for the award of any other degree at any university, and that, to the best of
my knowledge, this undergraduate thesis contains no material previously written by
any other person except where due reference is made in the text of the undergraduate
thesis.
Yogyakarta, June 30, 2015
Dian Purnamasari
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vii
but as it is written,
Things which eye saw not,
and ear heard not,
And which entered not into the heart of man,
Whatsoever things God prepared for them that love Him.
(1 Corinthians 2: 9)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
viii
I dedicated this thesis to:
Jesus Christ
My beloved family
My lovely friends
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My thanks go to my Lord, Jesus Christ for all blessings to me. Thank Him
for always being beside me to help, to support, and to give me each day to finish
this undergraduate thesis.
Acknowledgements are due to a number of people for their love,
assistance and commentaries in the process of writing this undergraduate thesis.
My deepest gratitude firstly goes to my Advisor, Drs. Hirmawan Wijanarka,
M.Hum, for his attention, care, patience and kindness in the process of writing this
undergraduate thesis.
I would like to dedicate this undergraduate thesis to my beloved family,
my mother, my father, my sister, and my brother. Thanks for all their support and
pray in the process of writing my undergraduate thesis. Thanks for to be my side
in my time of need. All of you are gifts for me that last forever. I am proud to
have all of them as my family. Thanks for being my reason to fight. They are my
family who build me up. I want to make all of you be proud to have me.
Last but not least, my gratitude goes to my lovely friends, Lenny’s Cell
Group, Disciples Connect Group, Maho Insaf badminton club, OKWS (Ojo Koyo
Wong Susah) group, Sanata Dharma University badminton club, KKN (Kuliah
Kerja Nyata) group, Music ministry, SPBU (Seng Penting Bahagia Uhui) group,
my senior high school friends who turned into my family. All of you are the
family I choose. Thanks for support, encourage, and pray for me in the process of
writing my undergraduate thesis. Thank you for standing by my side when times
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
x
get hard. They can make the good times better and the hard times easier. I am
thankful that all of them in my life.
30 June, 2015
Dian Purnamasari
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE ............................................................................................................. ii
APPROVAL PAGE ................................................................................................... iii
ACCEPTANCE PAGE .............................................................................................. iv
LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH ................................ v
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ......................................................................... vi
MOTTO PAGE ........................................................................................................ vii
DEDICATION PAGE .............................................................................................. viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................... ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... xi
ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. xiii
ABSTRAK ............................................................................................................................ xiv
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study ............................................................................. 1
B. Problem Formulation .................................................................................. 4
C. Objective of the Study ................................................................................. 4
D. Definition of Terms ..................................................................................... 4
CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF LITERATURE
A. Review of Related Studies ......................................................................... 6
B. Review of Related Theories ........................................................................ 9
1. Theory of Character and Characterization ............................................ 9
2. Relation Between Literature and Psychology ..................................... 11
3. The Characteristic Of Psychopath ....................................................... 12
4. Theories of Personality by Sigmund Freud ......................................... 15
C. Theoretical Framework ............................................................................. 22
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xii
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY
A. Object of the Study.................................................................................... 23
B. Approach of the Study .............................................................................. 24
C. Method of the Study .................................................................................. 25
CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS RESULT AND DISCUSSIONS
A. The Characteristic of Michael Swango as a Psychopath .......................... 27
B. The Factor that Make Michael Swango become a Psychopath ................ 47
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION ................................................................................ 48
BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................... 51
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiii
ABSTRACT
DIAN PURNAMASARI. A Psychoanalytical Study on Michael Swango’s
Psychopath in James Stewart’s Blind Eye. Yogyakarta: Department of English
Letters, Faculty of Letters, Sanata Dharma University, 2015.
Blind Eye is one of James Stewart’s works about a doctor who could be a
serial killer in the form of non- fiction novel. The murderer was a doctor, Michael
Swango, who murdered more than sixty of his patients, tried to poison his friends
in hospital and his lovely girls. He always did it with poison.
This study aims to find out the characteristics of Michael Swango as a
psychopath and the factors that made Michael Swango become a psychopath.
The method of the study is library research. Theory of character and
characterization, relation between literature and psychology, the characteristic of
psychopath, and theories of personality by Sigmund Freud were applied in this
study. The writer applied psychoanalysis criticism since it covered some aspects
that were relevant to answer the problem. In analyzing, the writer tried to identify
the characteristics of Michael Swango as psychopath with theory of character and
characterization, also the characteristics of psychopath. The writer also tried to
identify the factors that made Michael Swango become a psychopath by using
province of the mind, pleasure and the id: inhibition and the ego in theories of
personality by Sigmund Freud.
The results of the study can be formulated as follows. There are six
characteristics of Michael Swango as psychopath. They are antisocial, egoistic,
irritable, dominant, hypocritical, and cruel. The factors that make Michael
Swango become psychopath are the trauma in the past that cannot be eliminated in
hysteria major or dissociation, the trauma with his childhood experience in
obsessive- compulsive neurotic and he failed in the face of the competition in
neurasthenia.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiv
ABSTRAK
DIAN PURNAMASARI. A Psychoanalytical Study on Michael Swango’s
Psychopath in James Stewart’s Blind Eye. Yogyakarta: Prodi Sastra Inggris ,
Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Blind Eye merupakan salah satu karya James Stewart yang berupa kisah
nyata tentang dokter yang menjadi pembunuh berantai dalam bentuk novel.
Pembunuh dalam novel tersebut adalah dokter yang bernama Michael Swango
yang membunuh lebih dari enam puluh pasienya, mencoba meracuni teman-
temanya di rumah sakit dan pacar kesayanganya. Dia selalu membunuh dengan
racun.
Riset ini bertujuan untuk mencari karakteristik dari Michael Swango
sebagai psikopat dan faktor yang membentuk Michael Swango menjadi psikopat.
Metode yang diterapkan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian
kepustakaan. Teori karakter dan karakterisasi, hubungan antara sastra dan
psikologi, karakteristik psikopat, dan teori kepribadian oleh Sigmund Freud
diterapkan dalam penelitian ini. Dalam analisis, penulis mencoba mengidentifikasi
karakteristik dari Michael Swango sebagai psikopat dengan teori karakter dan
karakteristik, juga menggunakan teori karakteristik psikopat. Penulis juga
mencoba mengidentifikasi faktor yang membentuk Michael Swango menjadi
psikopat dengan menggunakan teori daerah pikiran, kesenangan dan id: hambatan
dan ego dalam teori kepribadian oleh Sigmund Freud.
Hasil penelitian dapat dirumuskan sebagai berikut. Terdapat enam sifat
yang ada dalam diri Michael Swango sebagai seorang psikopat. Sifatnya yaitu
antisosial, egois, cepat marah, dominan, munafik, dan kejam . Faktor yang
membuat Michael Swango menjadi psikopat yaitu trauma pengalaman masa lalu
yang tidak bisa dilupakan dalam hysteria pokok atau disosiasi, trauma pengalaman
masa kanak- kanak dalam obsesif kumpulsif neurosis, dan kalahnya persaingan
dalam neurasthenia
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
Literature is creative imagination which expresses the thought, feeling and
idea about life. It talks about love, hatred, happiness, sadness, war, and peace.
Literature is something that reflects society, makes people think about themselves
and their society. It usually allows people to enjoy language and beauty. It is used
to describe anything from creative writing, but the term is most commonly used to
refer of the creative imagination, such as poetries, dramas, and novel. The readers
usually learn about literature and enjoying the atmosphere of it.
One of the creative imaginative works is a novel. “Novels have been
specially crafted and constructed. Any novel, therefore, can be described as a
world specially made in words by an author. Any novel exists in the way it does
because an author has chosen to put it together in that particular way” (Gill,
1995:105). A novel has many fantasies. Novel is interesting because it can make
the reader continue to read it. Novel usually makes the readers surprised in some
way.
There are two kinds of the novel, fiction and non – fiction. Blind Eye is the
non-fiction novel that has a terrifying story about a doctor named Michael
Swango who got away with murder. According to Duke, nonfiction novel is
telling of an event or series of event that have occurred. The non-fiction novel is
about the real event and people, written based on the novel. The nonfiction novel
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2
presents facts, describes true-life experiences, or discusses ideas. It writes about
something factual, rather than fiction. The story of nonfiction novel cannot be
manipulated by the writer’s imagination. The writer of nonfiction novel has
specific information or ideas to convey the story. This makes the non-fiction genre
rather flexible.
Blind Eye presents the main character that has unusual behavior in the
social, family, career, and the main character’s life. The main character is a doctor
named Michael Swango who murdered more than thirty five patients and gave the
poison to paramedics and his girlfriends. Michael Swango always killed by using
poison. Michael Swango looked calm and acted like he did not kill people.
Michael Swango felt satisfied when he did that. Nobody believed that a doctor
who was young and handsome could be a serial killer. Wherever he practiced, he
looked like an ideal doctor until the discovery of the mysterious death. Strangely,
he always got away with murder. He moved to the hospital in Zimbabwe after no
hospital in America wanted to employ him. There were still many victims in
Zimbabwe. Michael Swango pursued the world of medicine for fifteen years, and
Michael Swango had the strong ambition with the sadistic death.
Most of the novels are designed to focus on history and the individual with
the problems in society. “A character is someone in literary work who has some
sort of identity (it needn’t be a strong one), an identify which is made up by
appearance, conversation, action, name, and (possibly) thoughts going on the
head” (Gill, 1995:127). A character is a person in a literary work. The authors
present the characters in society and show the action of their characters.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
3
“Characters are what they are like because of the way they’ve been made. The
kind of conversation they have, the things they do, their appearances and so on are
the particular ways in which the author has chosen to characterize his or her
character.” (Gill, 1995:127).
The characteristics of the people in the novel are not always good; there
are characteristics of the people that are bad. The good characteristics are
remembered in terms of the good that they do, their achievement or sacrifice. The
bad characteristics are usually remembered for the terrible things that they do and
make damages to other people and themselves. The behavior of the people
includes all those aspects of human activity which the writer can observe. That is
why literature is considered as one interesting thing to choose in this thesis.
There is not just one factor that influences the characteristics of the people.
The hundreds of different involvements of people’s experience throughout life
will develop the unique personality of the people. Throughout people’s lifespan,
there are many experiences that may compel them to change themselves. There
are hundreds of factors that develop and create what people know as identity.
People are not instinctively born with an attraction to certain things, people are
taught by other people around us.
The writer chooses the factor that shaped the main character and the main
character personality especially in the case of the psychopath in the Blind Eye
because this novel talked about the murder was done by the doctor. The other
reason is because Michael Swango, no one could believe that the handsome young
doctor might be a serial killer. Wherever he is hired in Ohio, Illinois, New York,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4
South Dakota, Michael Swango at the first seems the model physician then his
patients begin dying.
B. Problem Formulation
Considering the phenomenon clarified above, the writer proposes two
problem formulations:
1. What are the characteristics of Michael Swango as a psychopath?
2. What are the factors that make Michael Swango becomes a psychopath?
C. Objectives of the Study
The objective of the study is to answer the problem formulation. Based on
two problems, the writer sets two objects to be achieved. First is to describe more
the psychopath characteristic of Micahel Swango by using the theory of character
and characterization, also the theory of psychopath characteristic. Second is to
examine what the factors that make the main character as a psychopath by using
Freud’s Psychoanalysis.
D. Definition of Terms
To avoid the ambiguity, the analysis will provide some definition of
important words used in the analysis. It will help some perception. The writer
wants to give the definition of the psychopath. “Psychopath is a mentally ill
person who behaves violently without feeling guilt” (Krebs, Gordon, Hughes,
2009: 676). It means that psychopath is a person who has psychological brain
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5
different with a normal people. Psychopath does not care about other people and
does not feel regret like what normal people feel. Psychopath can do the criminal
cases. Psychopath is discovered as murder, rapists, drunks, gamblers, swindlers,
perpetrators of domestic violence and suicides.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
A. Review of Related Studies
In Hario Rustomo and Yan Ardian’s thesis on “Blind Eye: The Analysis of
Main Character of James B Stewart Novel by Using Psychological Perspective”,
they analyzed the psychological perspective of the main character that became
murder because of “inharmonic family”. Michael Swango liked to read murder,
death and criminal stories. Michael Swango did not get loves from his mother and
father. Everyone made him angry, hurt his feeling and did not believe him
anymore for anything. All mocked him about his hobbies that very like murder,
crashed car death and criminal story became obsession. The psychological
problems that the writer analyzes are: (1) what factors that shaped the main
character, (2) what kinds of psychological symptoms that the main character has.
When Michael J. Swango was a child there were many factors that shaped
the character of Swango. Swango grew up in inharmonic family. His father
always did the military roles and always gave punishment whenever he did
some mistakes. Besides, he always saw his mother quarrel with his father
almost every time when his father was at home. His mother very loves
Swango but she could not express it with physical expression like kissing
or hugging. The unusual hobbies appeared in Swango such as he liked to
read the detectives, mystery and murders stories. His mother always
bought them for Swango. When he grew up this hobbies about the death
had become obsession (Rustomo and Ardian, 2012:21).
Michael Swango had narcissism and antisocial symptom. Narcissism
appeared as he was crazy of compliment. It showed when Michael Swango with
proudly told to his paramedics friends that he worked hard with minimum wage, it
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
7
meant that just only hope that all people gave a praise to him. Michael Swango
felt angry when he heard someone comment about his body. The symptom of
narcissism seen when someone criticizes him, he was angry and while some of the
critiques he encounters may seem trivial.
Michael Swango had anti-social personality. Michael Swango in many
cases did not have responsibility on his job, his wife and did not care about the
death of his patients. Michael Swango changed his hobby to become obsession of
death. He was always interested in crash car, murder and the death.
There are the differences and similarities between Hario Rustomo, Yan
Ardian and the writer’s analysis. There are two analyses of Hario Rustomo, Yan
Ardian, and the writer. They analyzed the factor that shaped the main character in
the first point while that analyzed will be discussed in the second point of the
writer’s analyzed. The analysis about the factor is almost similar because they
analyzed about the factor that shaped the main character while the writer analyzed
about the factor that shape Michael Swango as psychopath, but the writer uses the
different theory from the theory that they used. They use Yungson’s theory while
the writer uses Freud’s theory about pleasure and the id, inhibition and the ego,
and province of the mind. They find that the factor that shapes the main character
is the harmonic family. The writer finds the factors that make Michael Swango as
psychopath are the traumatic in the past that cannot be eliminated in hysteria
major or dissociation, the trauma with his childhood experience in obsessive-
compulsive neurotic and he fails in the face of the competition in neurasthenia.
They analyzed about the kinds of psychological symptoms that the main character
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
8
has in the second point while the write analyzed about the characteristic of
psychopath in the first point. It is also different because they use Daviddoff’s
theory about kinds of psychological symptoms while the writer uses Meloy’s
theory about the character of psychopath. They find narcissism and antisocial
personality while the writer finds antisocial, egoistic, irritable, dominant,
hypocritical, and cruel in the personalities of Michael Swango as psychopath. The
writer wants to complement or added more information about what have been
analyzed by Hario Rustomo and Yan Ardian.
In Stella Marissa Yuda Wahu Lemek’s thesis on “The Significant Role of
Life and Death Instinct in Molding Henry Fleming’s Personality as Seen through
His Action in Crane’s The Red Badge of Courage”, she analyzed Henry Fleming’s
utterance. He was the major character in the novel. The discussion in her thesis
based on the objectives of the study which describe the characterization of Henry
Fleming, describe the forms of Fleming’s instinct based on Freud’s
Psychoanalysis theory and find out the significant role of Fleming’s instinct
toward Fleming’s personality.
There is the similarity between the analysis of Lemek and the writer. She
uses Freud’s Psychoanalysis theory to describe the characterization and finds out
the significant role of the major character’s instinct toward his personality.
Freud’s Psychoanalysis theory belongs to psychoanalysis criticism. The writer
also uses Freud’s Psychoanalysis theory to find province of the mind in major
character in Blind Eye through his personality. The writer analyzes the factor that
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
9
makes the characteristic of the main character through pleasure and the id:
inhibition and the ego in the theory of personality by Freud.
B. Review of Related Theories
1. Theory of Character and Characterization
According to M. H Abrams character is
The person presented in dramatic or narrative work, which are interpreted
by the reader as being endowed with moral, dispositional and emotional
qualities that are expressed in what they say- the dialogue- and by what
they do- the action- (Abrams, 1981: 23)
From the definition, the writer can conclude that the moral and emotional qualities
of the characters can be seen through their speech and action. Abrams mentioned
eight ways in which an author makes the rider aware of personalities and the
character of the people that he writes about in his book. An author does not make
us exclusively of anyone of these methods, but mix them skillfully together. The
rider can carried along by the stream of the narrative, is often unware of the skill
with which the author is revealing the characters and personality piece by piece.
The reader can tend to think of the author’s creation as real people. The writer
thinks that the eight ways are important to discuss here. The reader can understand
about personalities and characters of the people in the book. There are eight ways:
a. Personal description
The author can describe a person’s appearance and clothes. The telling and
accurate description can help the reader to know the character
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
10
b. Character as seen as by another
Instead of describing the character directly, the author can describe the
character through the eyes and opinion of another character.
c. Speech
The author can give us an insight into the character of one of the persons
in the book through what person says. It can be whenever a person speaks,
whenever they are in conversation with another character, whenever they puts
forward an opinion, they are giving the readers some clue to the character.
d. Past life
The author can give the readers a clue to event that have helped to shape a
person’s character by letting the reader learn something about the past life of the
character. It can be done by direct comment by the author, through the person’s
thoughts, through the conversation or the medium of another person.
e. Conversation of other
The author can give the reader a clue to the character through the
conversation of other people and the things they say about the character. People
talk about the other people and the things that they say can give as a clue to the
character of the person spoken about.
f. Reaction
The author can give the reader a clue to the character by letting the readers
know how the person reacts to various situation and event.
g. Direct comment
The author can describe or comment on the character directly
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11
h. Thought
The author can give direct knowledge of what a person is thinking about.
The author can tell the readers what different people are thinking.
The reader can understand why the character does the thing and emotional
feeling of the reader can also be involved when they read the story by knowing
about the characterization.
2. The Relation between Literature and Psychology
Literature and psychology are two different, but it is closely related.
Literature is representation of life in the form of language while psychology is
studies about human behavior. According to Wellek and Warren, literature is a
representation of human feeling, experience, and life:
Literature is the reflection of human feeling toward his life. It is closely
related to human experience through which we can learn the image of
human beings that is expressed in the written way. It can also be defined as
the work of arts which represents human life (Wellek and Warren,
1956:94).
According to Atkinson, psychology is the science that studies human’s
behavior and mental process. Psychology is only relation to human.
It is clear that both of them cannot be separated from the life of human
beings. According to Lindaurer, psychology is the studies about the
characteristics. The main object of this study is human being from real life.
Literature is also representation of human feeling and life. Lindauer said that
literature is the best describing human condition in dramatic form. Literary works
can serve as an object of psychoanalysis.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
12
Abrams said that human beings are presented through the characters,
defined as the persons in a dramatic or narrative work with moral and
dispositional qualities expressed in their speech and action in the literature.
People can find a lot of ideas from psychology and examples of
psychological cases revealed in the work if people do a close examination of
literary works. Literary works become a rich resource for the application of
psychology laws. Kalish said that the good literary works communicate the
characters’ feelings in a life like way and scholars from both fields may benefits
from the connection between psychology and literature:
Writers can use the understanding provided by psychologist to enrich their
stories, and psychologist can gain in their understanding of human
behavior by drawing from the deep sensitivity of good authors (Kalish,
1973:8).
People can conclude that literature and psychology are closely related
because of their mutual concern and object of study. Psychology becomes central
in literature to explain about each character’s minds, desires, and actions. It can
explain the whole work of literature.
3. The Characteristics of a Psychopath
According to Meloy, psychopaths are the abnormalities of the
psychopaths’ brain. Besides of the abnormalities of the psychopaths’ brain, the
genetic, environment, the absence of love, and lack of the emotional appreciation
are also influence the characteristic of psychopaths. “Two traits are essential in a
criminal: boundless egoism and a strong destructive urge. Common to both of
these, and a necessary condition for their expression, is absence of love, lack of an
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
13
emotional appreciation of (human) objects” (Freud, 1928: 178). Stress and the
pressure of life can also change people’s behavior to be brutal, but it cannot be
said of psychopaths if the condition is temporary and has the rational reason.
Psychopaths can be detected when someone was childhood through a variety of
unusual behavior. In criminal cases, psychopaths are discovered as murderers,
rapists, drunks, gamblers, swindlers, perpetrators of domestic violence, and
suicides. Otherwise, psychopaths are discovered as people who are intelligent of
speech, charming, have a tremendous attraction, and fun.
There are six characteristics of psychopath personalities. The first
characteristic is anti-social. Anti-social is the personality when people have not
good relation with other people in the society. They just have a few friends
because they have not good relation with other people. People who have anti-
social personality do not have attention to other people and only thinking about
themselves.
The second characteristic is egoistic. Psychopaths are very brilliant to
show their interest with something that they like and will ignorance with other
things. Some psychopaths look as charismatic people. The behavior of impulsive
psychopaths can be seen from not thinking first with their action that they do.
Psychopaths are generally acting of his willingness, for reasons that they like to
do it. Psychopaths have the big emotion and commit acts of violence to against
others. Psychopaths are enjoying others pain and even laughing with others
misfortune.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
14
The third characteristic is irritable. People who have lack of self-control
personality in the psychopaths cannot control their emotion and it makes
psychopaths look frigid. Psychopaths have lack of consciences because they do
not have a strong fear and anxiety in their life.
The fourth characteristic is dominant. Psychopaths’ behaviors look terrible
and astonish for the normal people. Psychopaths are looking the emotional as a
form of weakness. They utilize that feeling to enter into the others feeling with
purpose of exploiting them. They have an interest to control other people and do
not want anyone else have different opinions. Psychopaths are treating others
without feeling and also cruel. Psychopaths’ acts are generally involving of
violence act.
The fifth characteristic is hypocritical. The one of the psychopaths’ traits
are the attractive appearance. Psychopaths have the smooth – talking. Psychopaths
look very nice, interesting, and entertaining in their conversation. Psychopaths are
very smart to convince people about the positive things of them. They lie to other
people because they want to manipulate, cheating and lead on other people.
The sixth characteristic is cruel. Psychopaths tend to break the rules and
expectations of society. Psychopaths have no conscience. Psychopaths look their
self as superior people in their own rule.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
15
4. Theories of Personality by Sigmund Freud
a. Provinces of the Mind
According to Freud, personality is made up of three major systems. They
are the id, ego, and superego. “To Freud, the most primitive part of the mind was
das Es, or the “it”, which is almost always translated into English as id; a second
division was das Ich, or the “I” translated as ego; and a final province was das
Uber-Ich, or the “over-I”, which is rendered into English as superego.” (Feist,
1988: 27). Each of these systems has its own function, properties, components,
operating principles, dynamism and mechanism. The systems interact with the
three levels of mental life so that the ego can go into the various topography levels
and have conscious, preconscious, and unconscious. The superego is both
preconscious and unconscious. The id is completely unconscious.
i. Id
The id is completely unconscious. The id has no contact with the reality; it
is not change by the passage of the time or by the experience of the people. The
one of the important function from the id is to get the pleasure. “The id has no
contact with reality, yet it strives constantly to reduce tension by satisfying basic
desires. “Because its sole function is to seek pleasure, we say that the id serves the
pleasure principle” (Feist, 1988:27). In the id, the children’s desire is unchanged
for decades.
The id stands in direct opposition to the superego. The id is illogical and
can satisfying the thoughts that conflicting with one another because the id is
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
16
unrealistic and pleasure seeking without regard whether it is appropriate or not.
The id cannot distinguish between good and bad things.
These opposing desires are possible because the id has no morality; that is,
it cannot make value judgment or distinguish between good and evil.
However, the id is not immoral, merely amoral. All of the id’s energy is
spent for one purpose- to seek pleasure without regard for what is proper
or just (Feist, 1988: 28).
Essentially, the id is primitive, chaotic, and inaccessible to consciousness,
unchangeable, amoral, illogical, unorganized, and filled with energy received
from basic drives to the pleasure principle.
ii. Ego
The ego is only region of the mind that has contact with reality. The ego
controlled by reality principle which tries to replace the pleasure principle of the
id. The ego can make decisions on the conscious, preconscious, and unconscious.
The ego is the mediator between the id and superego, trying to ensure that the
needs of both the id and the superego can feel satisfied.
When performing its cognitive and intellectual functions, the ego must
take into consideration the incompatible but equally unrealistic demands of
the id and the superego. In addition to these two tyrants, the ego must
serve a third master- the external world. Thus, the ego constantly tries to
reconcile the blind, irrational, claims of the id and the superego with the
realistic demand of the external world. Finding itself surrounded on three
sides by divergent and hostile forces, the ego reacts in a predictable
manner- it becomes anxious. It then uses repression and other defense
mechanisms to defend itself against this anxiety (Feist, 1988:29)
The ego mediates between the id, superego and external world. The
purpose is to find a balance between primitive drives and reality (the ego devoid
of morality at this level) while satisfying the id and superego. The defense
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
17
mechanisms of the ego are often used when id behavior conflicts with reality and
either society’s morals, norms, and taboos.
The ego develops any strategies for handling the id’s unrealistic and
unrelenting demands for the pleasure. Sometimes, the ego can control the
powerful and pleasure seeking for the id, but it loses control at the other time.
iii. Superego
The superego includes the individual’s ego ideals, spiritual goals, and the
psychic agency (commonly called conscience) that criticizes and prohibits
people’s drives, fantasies, feelings, and actions. The superego tends to stand in
opposition to the desire of the id because of their conflicting objectives. The
superego acts as the conscience, maintaining our sense of morality and
proscription from taboos.
In Freudian psychology, the superego, or above- I, represents the moral
and ideal aspects of personality and is guided by moralistic and idealistic
principles as opposed to the pleasure principle of the id and the realistic
principle of the ego (Feist, 1988:30)
The superego has two subsystems, the conscience and the ego-ideal. The
conscience result from experience with punishment for behavior and tell people
what people should not do. The ego-ideal develops from experience with rewards
for behavior and tell people what we should do.
The superego watches closely over the ego, judging the actions and
intentions. The guilt is the result when the ego acts or intents to act, contrary with
the moral standards of the superego. The superego dominates the personality
through the guilt and inferior feeling. The inferior feeling arise when the ego is
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
unable to meet the superego’s standards of perfection. The guilt is a function of
conscience.
These pictures are show about the relation between id, ego, and superego
according to Feist about province of the mind by Sigmund Freud.
Id Ego Superego
A pleasure seeking person dominated
by the id
A guilt ridden or inferior feeling
person dominated by the superego
A psychologically healthy person
dominated by the ego
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
19
The first picture, the superego does not grow. The id dominated a weak
ego and a feeble superego. The ego cannot make the balance between the ego and
superego. Consequently, people who dominated by the id nearly constantly strives
for his pleasure regardless of what is possible or proper. The second picture, the
superego dominated the personality at the feeling of guilt or inferiority and a weak
ego. There will be many conflicts because the ego cannot make a balance and
cannot demand the superego and the id. The third picture, the ego dominated by
the id and superego. It is healthy person because the id, ego, and superego operate
in harmony and with a minimum of conflict. The strong ego can demand both the
id and superego. The id can control of both pleasure principle and the moralistic
principle.
According to all of three pictures, the superego is separate with id because
the superego grows of the ego. The superego watches closely over the ego,
supervise of the ego’s decision about actions and intentions. The circle of the ego
is connected with ego and superego because the ego must make the balance
between the id and superego. The ego has no strength of its own, but the ego
borrows energy from the id.
b. Pleasure and the Id: Inhibition and the Ego
According to Feist, “Neurosis is the result of a conflict between the ego
and its id” (Feist, 1998:54). The impulses of the id’s pleasure will increase if the
function of the ego is damaged. People who dominated by the id will become very
id driven because their ego no longer could inhibit basic drives and instincts. “The
underlying theme I the frontal lobe- injured patients is their inability to stay
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
20
“reality bound” (ego) and their propensity to interpret events much more through
“wishes” (id)” (Feist, 1998:55). It means they created the reality that they wanted
or wished for. Sometimes, neurosis called psychoneurosis and mental disorders.
Neurosis is a mental disorder that occurs only on the part of the personality, so
people who have neurosis can still do activity in daily life. There are six kinds of
neurosis and factors that make them.
i. Anxiety neurotic
Anxiety neurotic is apprehension about an unknown danger. The factor in
anxiety neurotic is something that should have been disclosed but buried.
ii. Hysteria neurotic
Hysteria is a neurotic characterized by emotional reactions that are not
controlled. There are two kinds in hysteria neurotic. First is hysteria minor or the
converse reaction. In minor hysteria, the anxiety is converted into somatosensory,
like paralysis, convulsions, death touch, blind, and deaf. Second is hysteria major
or dissociation reactions. Hysteria of this type can occur when the anxiety so
severe, it can separate the function of personality with one another. The hysteria
neurotic happens because of the traumatic experiences (painful experiences) and
then repressed or suppressed into the unconscious. The traumatic experience
cannot be eliminated, but there are still the traumatic experiences in the
unconscious.
iii. Phobic neurotic
Phobic neurotic is mental disorder with the main symptoms of phobia
which is a great fear with irrational object or situation. Phobic neurosis occurs
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21
because the patients have a great fear and shock with particular situation or object.
That experience is pressed into unconsciousness, but the experience cannot be lost
and will appear when there is a similar stimulation.
iv. Obsessive- compulsive neurotic
The obsessive refers to an immediate idea into the mind and the
compulsive refers to the impulse that cannot be detained for not performed even
though those actions are not necessary. The obsessive- compulsive neurotic occurs
when the conflict between the desires be pressed or transferred. It also occurs
when people who have obsessive- compulsive neurotic has a mental and
emotional trauma with childhood experience.
v. Depressive neurotic
The characteristics of depressive neurotic are less or not excited, low self-
esteem, and tend to blame themselves. Depressive neurotic occurs when people
who have depressive neurotic have the negative though and also creates a negative
atmosphere. People who have depressive neurotic understand reality is not what
reality actually is, but how they interpreted. Their interpretation can be wrong and
even contradict with the reality.
vi. Neurasthenia
Neurasthenia occurs when people who have neurasthenia are too long
pressing their feelings, inner conflict, and anxiety. The neurasthenia’s desires are
unobstructed. People who have neurasthenia often fail in the face of the
competition.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
22
D. Theoretical Framework
The writer uses the theory of the character and characterization to make it
easier to analyze the main character. The theory can help the writer to analyze the
behavior of the main character and help the writer analyzed the character through
the action, dialog, and the appearance. The writer uses the theory of the relation
between literature and psychology, the characteristic of psychopath and theories
of personality by Sigmund Freud to make easier when the writer described the
psychopath’s personality in the main character. The writer uses the theory of
personality by Sigmund Freud to help the writer analyze the factors that make the
main character becomes psychopath.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
A. Object of the Study
James B Stewart is the author of Heart of a Soldier, the bestselling Blood
Sport, and the blockbuster Den of Thieves. He is a former Page-One editor at the
Wall Street Journal. He won a Pulitzer Prize in 1988 for his reporting on the stock
market crash and insider trading. He is regular contributor to Smart Money and
The New York Worker.
Blind Eye is the work analyzed in this topic. The author of Blind Eye was
born in Quincy, Illinois. He lives in New York. He graduated from DePauw
University and Harvard Law School. He is a member of the Bar of New York and
Bloomberg Professor of Business and Economic Journalism at the Columbia
University Graduate School of Journalism. His first wrote about Michael Swango
in the November 24, 1997 of The New York Worker. His 1999 work, Blind Eye
won the 2000 Edgar Award in the Best Fact Crime category.
Blind Eye was non-fiction novel about a doctor who could be a serial
killer. The murderer is a doctor, Michael Swango, who murdered more than sixty
of his patients, tried to poison his friends in hospital and his lovely girls. He did
not many ways to kill many people but he always did it with poison. He felt
satisfied after doing it. FBI claimed that Michael Swango was responsible for
sixty murders.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
24
No one could believe that the handsome young doctor might be a serial
killer. Wherever he was hired, in Ohio, Illinois, New York, and South Dakota, he
at first seemed like the ideal doctor. His patients began dying under suspicious
circumstances. The workers in hospital and the police could not prove it even
though he did murder with poison.
A young and handsome doctor named Michael Swango was convicted of
poisoning five co-workers in Illinois at 1985. Michael Swango was in prison to
five years, but was paroled in 1987 and able to continue killing. Michael Swango
practiced in the hospital of Zimbabwe (Africa) after there were no hospitals in the
United States that would hired him. There were still victims in the hospital of
Zimbabwe, Africa. He has been involved as a doctor during fifteen years.
B. Approach of the study
The writer applies psychoanalysis approach to answer the problem in this
study. Psychoanalysis criticism is used in order to see the main character’s
personality. Psychoanalysis criticism is when people apply the same methods to
people interpretation of work literature. Psychoanalysis criticism is placed in the
conflicts of shaping behavior and personality. The aim of used psychoanalytic
approach is to investigate about the conscious and unconscious decisions.
“Psychoanalysis criticism is a form of literary criticism which uses some of the
technique of psychoanalysis in the interpretation of literature” (Barry, 1995:96).
The first psychoanalysis criticism was introduced to literary studies in
1920s and 1930s. During the first decades, it focused on exploring the author’s
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25
personality and life in order to understand their work, it is known as
psychobiography. The focus changed to character analysis in 1950s. There are
many mind aspect of the character that found in the analyzed of author’s work
which will be done in this paper. Now, psychoanalysis criticism involves the
reader’s mind in the interpretation work.
Psychoanalysis criticism is used in this paper because the subject is about
the characteristic of the person personality which closely related to the field of
psychology. It will be best explained through a psychological point of view.
C. Method of the Study
This writing is a library research. The data of this writing were taken from
Blind Eye by James Stewart. The theories taken from A Glossary of Literary
Terms by Abrams about character and characterization, The Psychology of Human
Behavior by Kalish and Theory of Literature by Wellek and Waren about the
relation between literature and psychology, A Psychoanalytic View of the
Psychopath by Melow about the characteristic of psychopath, Theories of
Personality by Feist about theories of personality by Sigmund Freud. The
approach was taken from Beginning Theory by Peter Barry about psychoanalytic
criticism.
There were several steps that are taken in the research. First, it was reading
the Blind Eye novel carefully to understand the idea of psychopath characteristic
through the story. The writer found the way the psychopath characteristic of the
main character presented in the story from this step.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
The second step was finding out some references related to the theory of
literature that was needed to help the writer to analyze the elements in the Blind
Eye novel such as theory of characteristic and characterization, relation between
literature and psychology, the characteristics of a psychopath, theories of
personality by Sigmund Freud.
The next was analyzing the character of Michael Swango as psychopath
by using theory characteristic and characterization and the characteristic of
psychopath after read the whole novel. The writer analyzed the factors that make
Michael Swango as a psychopath by using theories of personality by Sigmund
Freud after found out the characteristic of Michael Swango. Finally, the last step
was making a conclusion based on the overall analysis.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS
This chapter concerns on the discussion on the analysis psychopath
characteristic of Michael Swango and the factor that make Michael Swango as a
psychopath. Based on the problems formulation in the previous chapter, the
discussion on this chapter will be making into two subchapters. The first
subchapter attempts to present the description psychopath characteristic of
Michael Swango. The characteristic of psychopath in Michael Swango is
supported by theory of character and characterization, and the characteristic of a
psychopath. The second subchapter is the analysis on the factor that makes
Michael Swango as a psychopath. The factor that makes Michael Swango
becomes a psychopath is supported by theory of personality by Sigmud Freud.
A. The Characteristics of Michael Swango as a Psychopath
1. Anti-Social
The first characteristic of the psychopaths are anti-social. Anti-social is the
characteristic of the psychopath when people have not good relationship with
other people. They just have a few friends around them. They just think about
themselves, not other people
The book Blind Eye showed that Michael Swango was anti-social. He was
antisocial because he always came alone at midnight and did that assignment with
himself; he never came with his group to dissect the cadaver. He was not opening
up his self with other people. He had not good relationships with other people
around him.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
Michael Swango was the main character in this book. He had the antisocial
personality as a psychopath. In the first year, students divided into groups and
each student was assigned one part of the cadaver to dissect and present to the rest
of the group. Michael Swango‟s assignment was the tip and buttock region,
including the gluteus muscles. Every student had a key to the anatomy lab and
could come and go on their own time. The lab was busiest in the afternoon.
Michael Swango came to the lab after the mid night alone while other students
came to the lab in the evening.
But Swango never came in during the day or evening, preferring to work
on his dissection after midnight, when the lab was usually deserted. What
Swango gained in privacy from his unorthodox hours he lost in guidance
from faculty and other students (Stewart, 1986: 23).
Michael Swango had a view friends in the university. His friends did not
know about the background of his life. “Swango had few, if any, friends at SIU;
his fellow students later realized they knew almost nothing about his past, his
family, his education, or his military service” (Stewart, 1986: 23).
Michael Swango did not like chatting with other people. He did not
friendly with O‟Hare‟s nephew when he visited from South Dakota. “When
O‟Hare‟s nephew, Duncan, visited from South Africa, she insisted that Swango
come out to meet him. He did so briefly, seemed hostile, and immediately
returned to his room. When the Kerrs, other friends whom she wanted Swango to
meet, came for drinks, Swango refused to greet them” (Stewart, 1986: 262).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
2. Egoistic
The second characteristic of the psychopaths are egoistic. Egoistic is the
personality of the psychopath when they are enjoying others pain and even
laughing with others misfortune.
Michael Swango also had not empathy to his patients although it was
regarding about the people‟s life when his patients turned blue and need help in
the urgent situation. He was enjoying and even laughing when his patients were
died. He felt no empathy for his victims, so complete was his absorption in his
self. The thrill of killing and getting away with was simply had no deterrent in the
form of empathy of the people around him.
Michael Swango scrawled “DIED” in large capital letters across the
person‟s name when his patient died. Michael Swango liked celebrating the
demise and wanted to call attention to it. “Rosenthal went up to Michael and
asked him why he did such a thing “Don‟t you feel bad that she died?” Michael
gave Rosenthal a blank look, “No,” he replied. “That‟s just what happens”
(Stewart, 1986:33).
Michael Swango was on probation in America Ambulance. He had
responded to an emergency call in Rochester, Illionis, in a small town close to
Springfield. Michael‟s instruction was to administer any emergency treatment
called for and transport him in the ambulance to the nearest hospital but he made
the patient walk to his own car ad told the family to drive him to the hospital
themselves.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
At 8 A.M on February 6, the nurse, Richie, gave Barrick a bath. Barrick
was alert, talked, cheerful and seemed to be recovering after what happened
before. Richie noticed that the Central Venous Pressure (CVP) was low in the
central line, an intravenous tube supplying medication to the major blood vessels.
She called a doctor to check the line and checked other patients. Few minutes
later, Michael Swango entered to the Barrick‟s room. Michael Swango had drawn
the curtains entirely around Barrick‟s bed. Richie was shocked when she came
back to the Barrick‟s room. Barrick had turned blue and stopped breathing. The
nurse screamed “Code Blue! Code Blue!” then began mouth to mouth
resuscitation, desperately trying to get breath into the patient lungs. The nurse
looked up and saw Dr. Michael coolly watching her from the back of the room,
did nothing to assist her or the patient. “That is so disgusting,” Michael said of the
nurse of her efforts at mouth to mouth resuscitation, his voice tinged with
contempt” (Stewart, 1986:63).
On the afternoon, 20 February, Popko came to visit her daughter who had
undergone intestinal surgery for a deformed bowel. She was sitting close with her
daughter when Michael Swango came and asked her to leave the room to give the
injection to raise her blood pressure. He called Popko to his room after he gave
the injection to his daughter. He was enjoying the pain of the other people because
he had not empathy. “He leaned back and put his feet on the table. “She‟s dead
now,” Michael said of Mary‟s daughter. “You can go look at her” (Stewart,
1986:85).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
3. Irritable
The third characteristic of the psychopaths are irritable. Irritable is the
personality of psychopath when psychopaths look frigid because they cannot
control their emotion.
Michael Swango could not control his emotion; he was very angry and
said to cleaning woman that he would to blow up at her if she touched his
clippings again. He looked frigid to other people who made him angry and had not
a conscience.
Michael Swango liked to collect many clippings about articles of violent
death. He liked to make articles about violent death when he was a child and now
became an obsession. They did not like when someone saw him when he made the
clipping. He was very angry with a cleaning woman who touched his clippings.
Krzystofczyk and the other paramedics noticed that when Swanggo was on
duty and waiting for an ambulance call, he spent much of his time working
on four or five large scrapbooks. He‟d spread out articles on the table and
carefully paste them into one of the books. One day Krzystofczyk went
over to the table and looked at some of the articles. Many were about fatal
car crashes, and quit a few about poison. He could tell Swango didn‟t like
him sifting through the clipping. Swango told him that while he was living
in Colombus, a cleaning woman had “messed up” the order of the
clippings, and he said he‟d “blown up” at her. Krzyztofczyk took that as a
warning (Stewart 1986: 93).
There were a few complain from the nurse staffs to Michael Swango when
he worked in Africa. They said that Michael Swango was irritable and rude to
them. He was refusing to allow them to accompany him on his roads. “Swango
seemed unduly sensitive about his lab coat; he once flew into a rage after accusing
a nurse of touching it” (Stewart, 1986:230).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
32
4. Dominant
The fourth characteristic of the psychopaths are dominant. Dominant is the
personality of the psychopath when they have purpose to exploiting other people.
They are treating others without feeling and also cruel. Psychopaths‟ acts are
generally involving of violence act.
Michael Swango was dominant because he wanted to control the death and
life of the patients. He looked terrible with his action to monopolize the other
people around him. He was treating his patients without feeling and also cruel.
Michael Swango looked terrible and astonish because he felt satisfied
when he killed the patients. He was treating his patients and people around him
without feeling and also cruel. “Why did you kill?” “Well, people controlled me
for 18 years, and then I controlled my own destiny. I controlled other people‟s
lives, whether they lived or die. I had that power to control” (Stewart, 1986:296).
He had the control of the victim‟s life when he works as paramedic and
came to the scene of the accident. “In his work as paramedics, when he came to
the scene of accidents, and fantasies I which he would arrive on the scene of
disasters and have control over the fate of the victims” (Stewart, 1986: 291).
5. Hypocritical
The fifth characteristic of the psychopaths are hypocritical. Hypocritical is
the personality of the psychopath when they have the smooth – talking.
Psychopaths look very nice, interesting, and entertaining in their conversation.
Psychopaths are very smart to convince people about the positive things of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
33
themselves. They lie to other people because they want to manipulate, cheating
and lead on other people.
Michael Swango lied constantly to cover up his past in order to get a job
and to get away with something. He was very smart to convince people to make
them believe that he did not guilty. He was a good liar. He was very smart to
make people sure about the positive things on himself. He lied frequently because
he wanted to manipulate the life of other people. He was very adept at exhibiting
counterfeit displays of emotion.
Michael Swango falsified his data when enter into college, although he
had been one of the college‟s top applicant.
On a form he submitted to the college‟s public information office, he
falsely claimed that he had received both a Bronze Star for heroism in
combat, and a Purpple Heart for combat wounds during his relatively brief
tenure as a Marine (Stewart, 1986:26).
Michael Swango did plagiarism when he made three pages when he was in
the college. He just spent ten minutes with the patient to analyze; it was possible
his report was too complete and polished. He manipulated the data on his
research. The lecturer felt strange about his report and she visited the patient to
ask about Michael‟s visit. “Stunned, O‟Connor concluded that the entire three
page report was either a fabrication, a plagiarism from an earlier H and P by
resident, or combination of the two” (Stewart, 1986:49).
Michael Swango denied that he had failed to examine any patients and
denied plagiarizing about the report of H and P when the lecturer called him to the
room. He had no enough time to make the report because he worked as an
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
34
emergency medical technician. He said that he had no choice as an emergency
medical technician because his father had died earlier that year and he must gave
money to his mother and his two brothers. Psychopath had the smooth talking
with other people. He had the smooth talking about the untruth. In fact, his mother
had a well-paid job as business manager at the Casio Lanes bowling alley and
received a pension as the widow of military and Foreign Service officer and
helped to pay for Michael‟s school. He cannot graduate with his class and he told
to his mother that because of computer mix up, he had in advertently been
dropped from the list of graduates.
Louise who was Michael Swango‟s aunt scanned for Michael Swango‟s
name in the Springfiels State Journal Register before the graduation. There was no
Michael Swango‟s name. She looked over the entire list again to make sure, but
Michael Swango‟s name was also missing. His mother and aunt still went to
Quincy to see Michael Swango graduate. His mother told to Louise that her son
had not graduate with his class after Michael Swango called her when she arrived
at the motel. Michael Swango lied to his mother that he could not graduate
because the problem of the computer. “Just before leaving the motel, about an
hour before the graduation, Michael had told her that because of a computer mix-
up, he had in advertently been dropped from the list of graduates” (Stewart,
1986:54).
Dr. Carey did ask Michael Swango specifically whether he had done
anything to his patient or injection in her that made her turned blue then stopped
breathing and he said no but volunteered a detailed account that differed from his
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
35
answer to Dr. Freeman the night before. Michael said that he had gone into his
patient room because the patient had told him her feet were cold and asked him to
fetch her slippers. He did so and left immediately without doing anything. He lied
because he wanted to cover up his mistake and avoided the punishment.
Michael Swango denied about killing his patients and poisoning his
friends in the court. He spent weeks to prepare his own statement.
“I am fully aware that I have been found guilty in a court of a law. And
with all due respect to the Court, I wish to state once again that I am
innocent of these charges”. “After graduation from medical school I took
the Hippocratic Oath and I have never nor would I ever violate the sacred
trust of the doctor patient relationship… In no way, shape, or form, under
no conceivable circumstance and I now, or have I ever been, or will I ever
be, a danger to any human being on the face of this earth” (Stewart,
1986:142).
Michael Swango had a girlfriend named Kristin. He had a dinner with
Kristin‟s parents. Her parents asked to the Michael Swango about his life before
he met their daughter. He lied about his life before he met their daughter to her
parents. He covered up about the reality that he never killed his patients, never in
prison, and never dismissed in South Dakota.
The Coopers growing dislike of Swango only hardened as he talked
incessantly, boasting that he had been accepted at two medical residency
programs, and had chosen one in New York. He talked as though he‟d just
gotten out of medical school, hadn‟t been in prison, hadn‟t been dismissed
in South Dakota, and had nothing to look forward to but a bright future
(Stewart, 1986:207).
Michael Swango had a close friend named Lorimer when he moved to
work in Africa as missioner. Lorimer was twenty seven years old; he talked about
his background about his family to Michael Swango. Michael Swango also talked
about his background of his family but he lied about his age to Lorimer. He lied
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
36
about his age to cover up his past life. “For his part, Swango said he, too, was
twenty seven years old (in reality, he was now forty)” (Stewart, 1986: 228).
Michael Swango needed a lawyer to clear his name from his crime. He
lied that he had been summarily suspended by the provincial minister of health
with unclear reason. He said that he was not guilty about the death of his patients.
“All he knew, he said, was that he was accused of having given some patients
injection that caused “ill effect”, and that he was being unfairly blamed for the
death of a few patients who had died of natural causes” (Stewart, 1986:245).
6. Cruel
The sixth characteristic of the psychopaths are cruel. Cruel is the
personality of psychopath when psychopaths tend to break the rules and
expectations of society. Psychopaths have no conscience. Psychopaths look their
self as superior people in their own rule.
Michael Swango broke the rules around him. He was abusing his role as a
doctor. The patients hoped that they would get recovery from Michael Swango as
a doctor, but preyed on the trust and hopes of sick and helpless people. He had not
conscience because he could torture and killed people around him. He often
fantasizes about violence and disasters. He had exhilaration at his own superiority
and contempt for his victims when he successfully put something over on another.
On February 6, Anne reported to Rhodes for the morning shift, and
assigned to a neurosurgery patient in room 968, the Barrick‟s room. She had been
admitted to the hospital on January 17. She had fallen and hit her head at home ten
days earlier and suffered a cerebral hematoma. On January 31, the nurse named
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
Deborah had given breakfast to her and assessed her condition. At 9:45 A.M,
Michael Swango came to Barrick room. It was not the time to check the patients.
Actually, Michael Swango had time to check her at 6:30 A.M. Michael Swango
ordered Deborah to get out from the room. Twenty minutes later, Barrick was
barely stopping breath and her skin became blue.
Dr Swango had come into Barrick‟s room and told Deborah, “I‟m going to
check on her.” Deborah though this was peculiar, since doctors rounded at
6:30 A.M. and rarely returned unless there was a specific problem. In such
cases, it was the attending physician, not an intern by himself, who would
call on the patient. But Deborah gave the matter little though. She left
Swango alone in the room with Barrick. About twenty minutes later,
Deborah returned to check on Barrick. Swango was gone. Barrick was
now reclining and seemed to be asleep. Barrick was barely breathing. Her
skin was taking on a bluish cast, a sign of imminent death from respiratory
(Stewart, 1986: 61).
There were two patients in room 900, Cooper and Utz. They had the same
room for twelve days. At 9 P.M on February 7, an Ohio State nursing student,
Beery, came in to room 900 and she was shocked to see Michael Swango there.
Cooper had requested more pain medication and asked Utz to hold the call button
down for her because she could not reach it and Michael Swango accepted a
respond to the call. Beery continued to check the other patients and leaved
Michael Swango in the room 900. No more two minutes, Beery heard the
screamed from Utz, she run to the room 900 and shocked she found Cooper was
turning blue and had stopped breathing after Michael Swango gave the injection
to her.
He was standing at Cooper‟s bedside, only about three feet from Beery,
and the student noticed that he was adding something to Cooper‟s
intravenous tube by inserting a syringe. “Her line must have clotted off”
was her only thought; she assumed Swango was clearing a blockage.
Beery stepped outside to enter data on Utz‟s chart. She was running late,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
38
and ready to move on to her next patient when, no more than two minutes
later, she heard Utz call out, “Are you all right, Mrs Cooper?” Then Beery
heard a violent rattling of bed rails, followed by Utz‟s screams. She rushed
into the room. Utz cried out, “There‟s something wrong!” Cooper was
turning blue and had stopped breathing (Stewart, 1986: 65).
Michael Swango had often mentioned to the other residents how much he
loved fried chicken, and one night he offered to buy Kentucky Fried Chicken for
the residents. Michael Swango wanted to get separated box with other. Three
hours after they ate that fried chicken, they felt violently ill with fever, nausea,
and vomiting in their masks and stuff, but Michael Swango did not although he
ate friend chicken with them.
Thomas Vara, the senior resident said that would be fine, but suggested,
“Instead of getting separate boxes, why don‟t you get a big bucket for all
of us to eat?” “No, no,” Swango said. “Let‟s keep it separate.” He insisted
on taking everyone‟s chicken and drink order. He returned with the orders
about 5 P.M. “its extra spicy chicken, “Swango told Ed Hashimoto, one of
the residents, as he gave him his food. That was news to Hashimoto. He
knew that Kentucky Fried offered “extra crispy” chicken, but he‟d never
heard of „extra spicy”. Vara, Hashimoto, and a third resident, Douglas
Hess, ate the chicken. About three hours later, all there fell violently ill,
with fever, nausea and vomiting that lasted over a week (Stewart 1986: 85-
86).
The writer can conclude that Michael Swango is psychopath because he is
anti-social, has lack of empathy, has lack of self-control, has great desire to
monopolize, deceiver, and cruel.
B. The Factor that Make Michael Swango become a Psychopath
Id Ego Superego
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
The picture has shown the relationship between id, ego, and superego in
the Michael Swango‟s mind. In the province of Michael Swango‟s mind as
psychopath, the id dominated a weak ego and a feeble superego. Michael Swango
did the amoral things to serve his pleasure like the function of the id. The ego of
Michael Swango‟s mind cannot make the balance of the id‟s demands. His ego
cannot press the irrational demand of the id. Consequently, Michael Swango
nearly constantly strives for his pleasure regardless of what is possible or proper.
In the picture, the superego is separated with id because the superego grows of the
ego. The superego watches closely over the ego supervises of the ego‟s decision
about actions and intentions. The ego is connected with ego and superego because
the ego must make the balance between the id and superego. The ego has no
strength of its own, but the ego borrows energy from the id so the ego is in the
middle between the id and superego.
The function of the ego is to consider between true and false, but Michael
Swango does not think that his acts are true or false when he killed his patients
and gave poison to paramedics. Michael Swango‟s superego is very weak and
does not work properly. He does not feel guilty, depressed, and even
underestimate his error after he killed his patients and gave poison to the
paramedics. The superego has no power against the id to affect the ego.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
Michael Swango does not feel guilty. He still looked for the job as a doctor
after he went out from the jail because his case about killed his patients and gave
the poison to paramedics. He had a big possibility and opportunity to kill his
patients and give the poison to the paramedics when he got back his job as a
doctor. “The judge was amazed and dismayed that Swango had surface yet again,
en route to still another job as a physician” (Stewart, 1986: 287). He killed his
patients and gave poison to the paramedics again when he got back his job as a
doctor. He had been able to move from one hospital to another to kill his patients
and give the poison to the paramedics.
He did not feel guilty and he felt that his patients deserved the punishment
when he gave the poison to them until the point of death. He did not feel sad, even
felt satisfied and happy when he informed to the family about the death of his
patients. “This deficit may have been most evident in Swago‟s numerous callous
remarks about death, in his delight in being the doctor to inform relatives of the
death of a loved one” (Stewart, 1986:294).
The factor that makes the id more dominant is because neurosis. Neurosis
is the conflicts between the id and ego in people mind. The impulses of the
Michael Swango‟s id pleasure will increase because the function of the ego is
damaged. Michael Swango dominated by the id and very id driven because his
ego no longer can inhibit his basic drives and instincts. There are six kinds of
neurosis and factors that make them, but there are two neuroses and factors that
make Michael Swango become a psychopath. First was because Michael Swango
could not drop the traumatic experience in hysteria major or dissociation
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
reactions. Second was because Michael Swango had mental and emotional
traumas with past experience or his childhood experience in obsessive-
compulsive neurotic. Third was because Micahel Swango failed in the face of the
competition in Neurasthenia.
1. Hysteria major or dissociation reactions
The factor of hysteria major or dissociation reactions is because traumatic
experience cannot be elimited. Michael Swango had traumatic experience about
the critic for other people.
Michael Swango had a big attention to his body. He was fanatical devotion
to fitness. He always did sport in the morning. “When Rosenthal and other
classmate struggled out of bed in the morning after a late night of studying, they
would often see Swango outdoors doing early- morning calisthenics, chanting
Marine cadences” (Stewart, 1986:22). Some people praise him that he had slim,
tall body and he was also handsome boy.
Michael Swango and his girlfriend named Kristine went to the Kristin‟s
parents. Michael Swango nearly went berserk, ranting and pacing rapidly back
and forth in the living room when Sharon Cooper who was Kristin‟s mother said
to him that he put on a few pounds. He shouted, proceeding to denounce her
treatment of him.
They came over to see the Coopers the next day. Al was out, and Sharon
greeted him at the front door. Swango looked as if he‟d gained some
weight, which surprised Sharon, since he‟d always been so determinedly
trim and fit. “You look like you‟ve put on a few pounds,” she said
(Stewart, 1986:203-204).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
Michael Swango have a big attention to his body, he erupted in rage when
Sharon Cooper commented that he had put on a few pounds. The criticism he
encountered may seem trivial, but he could not brook criticism or challenge of any
kind because he always got praises from other people. He almost invariably
attributes criticism or a challenge to persecution.
2. Obsessive- compulsive neurotic.
The factor of obsessive- compulsive neurotic is because traumatic with
childhood experience. Michael Swango had traumatic with his past experience on
his family when he was a childhood. Michael Swango had not harmonic family.
Michael Swango‟s father named Virgil; he almost had not contact with his
three sons (Bob, Michael, and John) although he met them in the house every day.
“For he had almost no contact with him or his other sons, and had only sporadic
involvement with them a children” (Stewart, 1986:36-37). This condition made
Swango lost the figure of his father.
His father applied the military rule in Swango‟s family. He taught his
children about military lesson. Michael Swango was really afraid when his father
was at home. He gave the physical punishment to Bob although the small mistake.
Everything what his father said or command they had to do it. Bob was the first
child so he was responsible for his younger brother (Michael and John) mistake
liked officer was responsible for the conduct of their mistake in the military.
When the boys were young and the family was living at Fort Benning, he
trained them to march in formation, salute, and execute military
commands. He also enforced a disciplinary code derived from the military
principle that an officer is responsible for the conduct of those he
commands. In the Swango household, this meant that the oldest child was
responsible for his younger brother, so Bob was punished whenever
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
Michael or John misbehaved. Such as the time Bob stole $10 from his
father, or when he referred to an officer named Maloney as Baloney- when
Virgil whipped Bob with a belt. Michael, on the other side, was never
subject to corporal punishment, nor was John, but they saw it (Stewart,
1986: 36:37).
The love of his mother was just given more to Swango than the other sons
but the expression was not in physical expression like kiss or hug. She only gave
something special to Michael Swango such as gave him the music lesson, the
expensive clarinet, and the private school education. It showed that there was not
love of his parents. There was just only physical hardness that showed by his
parents.
Bob and John began to feel left out. Whatever love their mother could
muster for her children seemed to be allocated disproportionately to
Michael. Only he received the music lessons, the expensive clarinet, and
the private school education. But not even Michael received motherly hugs
or kisses. Muriel seemed incapable of expressing any physical affection
(Stewart, 1986:43).
His father always rejected the children‟s request to go picnic. Swango‟s
family just went to their grandfather and grandmother house every summer. He
was barking orders at his children and rejected with his children‟s request to visit
someplace where they passed at their trip. They used unconditioned car, and their
parents were smoking without thought about the children‟s comfort.
Until Virgil left for Vietnam, every summer he loaded the family and their
luggage into a station wagon and they set out for visit to the grandparents.
They boys were lodged in the rear of tear unairconditioned car for what
seemed like unending treks across the sweltering Southern or Plains states.
Their parents sat in the front seat, chain smoking. Virgil ran the
expeditions like military maneuvers, barking orders at the boys, rejecting
pleas to visit tourist attractions along the route or to make brief stops, even
to use a rest room (Stewart, 1986:39:40).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
44
Michael Swango who was rejected or ignored by their parents was not to
develop a warm feeling with others. He became less able to having empathy
feelings or needs of others. His attitude did not care about the other people.
His parents were always quarrel, they always quarrel in front of Swango
and his brother. His father was out late almost every day after his career was
winding down, so Muriel and her sons rarely saw Virgil.
One evening Bob, Michael, and John were watching TV and doing their
homework when their father returned. They heard their mother conform
him. “Why are you never home?” she angrily demanded. Some kind of
argument ensued, with shouting that left Muriel in tears. Virgil stormed
out the house. The boys were shocked (Stewart, 1986: 40).
Virgil and Muriel never told to their children about their romance and
courtship when they were young. Bob, Michael, and John almost never saw the
psychical contact between her mother and her father like kiss or hug. They usually
compared their parents with the parents of their friends. “Muriel and Virgil slept
in twin beds and there were no sign of physical affection between them. Not even
the boys ever saw them kiss or trade affectionate hugs” (Stewart, 1986:39).
Michael Swango interested with articles about violent death since he was
childhood. “Michael had a fascination for articles about violent death since
childhood, when he began clipping National Enquirer articles” (Stewart, 1986:
46). Sometimes, his mother helped him to clip articles into the book for him. His
father always did angry and punish his children when they did mistake although
the small mistake. His parents always quarrel in front of their children. Those
conditions shows that Michael Swango grown up where the environment of crime
culture was appreciated. His father also like with disaster, killing, and weapons.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
45
He also had scrapbooks of disaster. “Yet his fascination with disasters, with
killing, and with weapons echoed similar interests he perceived in his father, as
when he learned that Virgil also kept scrapbooks of disasters” (Stewart,
1986:291). It made him very interested in crime cases, murder, and everything
about accident. His interest made he had good reasons to do crime.
The residents complained to others doctor that Michael Swango was
“weird”. He did push up to punish himself when he got some critiques to his
performance in the hospital. “Whenever they criticized Swango – as they often
did, because of his incompetence – Swango would immediately drop to the floor
and begin a strenuous set of push-ups. He could do hundreds of them” (Stewart,
1986:59). The residents though his action was not only peculiar but highly
inappropriate for a doctor. Michael Swango persisted although they reprimanded
him. Michael Swango developed a sense that a certain thing must be done without
mistake because the traumatic experience about everything what his father did
about military rule when he was childhood.
3. Neurasthenia
The factor of neurasthenia is because people failed in the face of the
competition. Michael Swango failed in the face of competition with his friends in
the college.
In the first year, the students dissect a cadaver. The students were divided
into groups and each student in the group was assigned one part of the cadaver.
They also presented about their part in front of other group. Michael Swango‟s
assignment was the hip and buttock region, including the gluteus muscles. Every
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
46
student had keys to the anatomy lab and could come and go on their own time.
The lab was busiest in the afternoon, but Micahel Swango always came after
midnight when the lab deserted. Michael Swango lost in guidance from faculty
and other student because he liked to do his work alone. His friends shocked when
he opened his dissection to do presentation. His dissection was very untidy. His
friends tough that he had done his dissection using a chain rather than a scalpel.
“He had transformed the hip region of the cadaver into unrecognizable mess of
tangled flesh and bone” (Stewart, 1986: 23). Michael Swango could not describe
the region‟s anatomical characteristic using his own work. He made one of the
best known of seventy two members of the class about the cadaver tragedy. Many
students talked and derided about Michael Swango‟s dissection. He was angry
when teased and belittle in medical school because of this case. That experience
has been humiliating for Micahel Swango because he had received almost nothing
but praise and perfect grade.
He cannot graduated with his class because his three entire page about H
& P was a plagiarism from an earlier H & P by other resident or combination
between other resident and Michael Swango. The chief resident of OB/GYN
names O‟Corner felt strange about his report was too complete and polished
because he just spent ten minutes with the patient. Michael Swango‟s failure to
graduate with his friends was so humiliating. He could not bring himself to tell his
mother or show up at the dinner where he would have to face his mother and his
aunt.
Swango would not be allowed to graduate with his class. But either would
he be expelled or asked to withdraw. He would be required to repeat his
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
47
OB/GYN rotation. He would also be given assignment from some of the
faculty‟s strictest professors in other specialists, all of them aware of the
allegation against him. If he passed these assignments, he would be
allowed to graduate. If not, he would be dismissed. (Stewart, 1986:53).
Michael Swango was assigned to work at the Quincy Notre Dame High
School football game when he worked in ambulance. He was assigned to the
backup ambulance, not in the primary ambulance. “Swango was assigned to the
backup ambulance rather than (as he preferred) to the primary emergency vehicle”
(Stewart, 1986:98). Michael Swango gave poison to paramedics after he was
mocked for not being assigned to the primary ambulance.
Michael Swango assumed that those two incidents was extreme
humiliation to him. He always got awards and honors when he was in elementary
school until the day before those two accidents. He did murder and gave poison to
revenge because of the extreme humiliation.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
48
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION
Based on the analysis, finally the writer is able to find the answer to the
problem formulated in the first chapter. The writer has managed to answer the
first problem formulation about the psychopath characteristic of Micahel Swango
by applying the theory of character and characterization and also the theory of
psychopath characteristic. The first characteristic of Michael Swango was
antisocial. Michael Swango came alone in the lab when he had an assigned one
part of the cadaver with his group. He came after midnight alone while other
students came in the evening. Michael Swango had a few friends in the college
and his friends did not know about Michael Swango’s background.
The second characteristic of Michael Swango is egoistic. Egoistic showed
when his patients were died; he scrawled “DIED” with the capital letters. Michael
Swango made the patient walk to his own car and told the family to drive him to
the hospital themselves when he was on probation in America Ambulance.
Michael Swango did nothing and just watched when his patients had turned blue
then stopped breathing. Michael Swango called Popko who was the mother of one
of his patient to come into his room and told her that her daughter died without
sadness.
The third characteristic of Michael Swango is irritable. Irritable showed
when he was very angry when a cleaning woman touched his clipping. Michael
Swango was also very angry when the nurse touched his lab coat.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
49
The fourth characteristic of Michael Swango is dominant. The
characteristic of great desire to monopolize showed when he had desire to control
the death and life of his patients.
The fifth characteristic of Michael Swango is hypocritical. Hypocritical
showed when entry into the college, he falsified his data. Michael Swango did
plagiarism in his three pages paper. Michael Swango lied about his family when
the lectured asked why he did plagiarism. Michael Swango lied that he did not
gave the injection and killed the patients when other doctor asked him about the
death of one of the patient. Michael Swango lied about his life before met his
girlfriend when the parents of his girlfriend asked about his career and his family
before met their daughter. He lied about his age when his close friend asked about
his age.
The sixth characteristic of Michael Swango is having cruel behave to other
people. Michael Swango killed his patients with the injection. Michael Swango
also gave poison to his friends in the hospital.
The writer answers the second problem formulation about the factors that
make Michael Swango a psychopath by applying the Freudian theory. Michael
Swango’s id is more dominant than his ego and superego. His ego cannot make a
balance between the id and superego. There are three factors that make Michael
Swango becomes a psychopath. First, Michael Swango had a traumatic in the past
experience and he could not be eliminated that experience in hysteria major or
dissociation reactions. Other people gave praise that he had slim, tall body and he
was also handsome boy. Michael Swango nearly went berserk, ranting and pacing
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
50
rapidly back and forth in the living room when Sharon Cooper who was Kristin’s
mother said to him that he put on a few pounds. He had a big attention about his
body. He assumed that the criticism was a persecution.
Second, Michael Swango had a traumatic in the childhood experience
when he was a child in his family when he was a child in obsessive- compulsive
neurotic. He did not have a harmonic family. His father did not has contact with
his boys even though they met every day in the house. His father used military
rule in his family. He also gave a physical punishment when his children made a
mistake although the small mistake. He always gave punishment to Bob when
Bob, Michael, and John made a mistake because Bob was the first child like
officer was responsible for the conduct in the military. His mother could not
express her physical love to her boys like kiss or hug. His father refused his boys
request to go someplace to recreation. The parents always quarrel in front of the
Swango and the other child. The boys almost never saw their parents had a
physical contact like kiss and hug. Michael Swango interested with articles about
violent death since he was a child because he grown up where the environment of
crime culture was appreciated. He did push up to punish himself when he got
some critiques to his performance in the hospital. He had sense that a certain thing
must be done without mistake because the traumatic experience about everything
what his father did about military rule when he was a child.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
51
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abrams, M.H. A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York: Rinehart and Winston,
Inc., 1981.
Atkinson, Rita L.,Richard C. Atkinson, and Ernest R. Hilgard. Introduction to
Psychology. 8th
edition. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1983.
Bender L. Psychopathic Behavior Disorders in Children. New York:
Philosophical Library, 1947
Barry P. Beginning Theory. New York: Manchester University Press, 1995.
Bressler, Charles. Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice.
New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, 1999.
Duke. What’s the Difference between Informational Text and Nonfiction?
<http://teacher.scholastic.com> (Accessed on 4 July 22015)
Feist JG. Theories of Personality. America, New York: Mc Graw-Hill Companies,
Inc, 1998.
Frick P, Lilienfeld S, Ellis M, Loney B, Silverthorn P. The Association between
Anxiety and Psychopathy Dimensions in Children. New York: J Abn Child
Psychology, 1999.
Gordon. E, Hughes. G, Krebs. W. A. Collins School Dictionary. UK: Harper
Collin Publisher, 2009.
Gill, Richard. Mastering English Literature.London: Macmillan Press LTD, 1995.
Lye, John. On The Uses of Studying Literature.
<http://brocku.ca/English/jlye/uses.html> (Accessed on 30 April 2015).
Kalish, Richard A. The Psychology of Human Behavior. California: Brooks/ Cole
Publishing Company, 1973
Lemek, SMYH. “The Significant Role of Life and Death Instinct in Molding
Henry Fleming’s Personality as Seen through His Action in Crane’s The
Red Badge of Courage”. <http://library.usd.ac.id> (Accessed on: 2 Mei
2015)
Lindaurer B. Psychology and Its Allied Disciples. Vol 1. Englewood Cliffs:
Prentice-Hall,1999.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
52
Meloy JR. The Psychopathic Mind: Origins, Dynamics and Treatment. Northvale,
NJ: Jason Aronson, 1988
Meloy, JR. A Psychoanalytic View of the Psychopath. Washington DC: American
Psychiatric Press, 2006.
Pickering, James H, and Jeffrey D. Hoeper. Concise Companion to Literature.
New York: Macmillan, 1981.
Rustomo, Hario and Yan Ardian. “Thesis on Blind Eye: The Analysis of Main
Character of James B Stewart Novel by Using Psychological Perspective.”
<http://library.wanastra.ac.id> (Acceessed on: 12 September 2014)
Stewart,B James. Blind Eye. New York: Random House, Inc., 1986.
Wellek, Rene and Austin Warren. Theory of Literature. New York: Hartcourt,
Brace and World, Inc., 1956.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI