PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

26
PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards

Transcript of PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Page 1: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia

Journal Club April 2012

Chris Edwards

Page 2: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Introduction• What is your clinical practise with moderate to severe

pneumonia?• “48 hours IVs and then home on orals if culture

negative.”• But this doesn’t make sense ….

Page 3: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Plan• PICO• Search• Result• Trial Analysis• Summary• Discussion

Page 4: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

PICO• P- children with pneumonia• I – Oral antibiotics• C – IV antibiotics• O- time to recovery/time in hospital

Page 5: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Search• Medline• “pneumonia AND antibiotics”• RCTs• Children (0-18 years)• English language• ~80 hits• Then looked for developed world(few) rather than

developing world (lots)

Page 6: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Result• Comparison of oral amoxicillin and intravenous

benzylpenicillin for community acquired pneumonia in children(PIVOT trial): a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled equivalence trial

• M Atkinson, M Lakhanpaul, A Smyth, H Vyas, V Weston, J Sithole, V Owen, K Halliday, H Sammons, J Crane, N Guntupalli, L Walton, T Ninan, A Morjaria, T Stephenson

• Thorax 2007;62:1102–1106. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.074906

Page 7: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

Page 8: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis“A study was undertaken to ascertain whether therapeutic equivalence exists for treatment of community acquired pneumonia by the oral and IV route.”

Population: Children, but no upper age limit was specified.Intervention: IV v Oral antibioticsOutcomes: “therapeutic equivalence” taken as:

Primary outcome measure was time from randomisation until the temperature was <38°C for 24 continuous hours and oxygen requirement had ceased

Secondary outcomes: included time in hospital,complications (empyema, readmission, further courses of antibiotics),duration of oxygen requirement time to resolution of illness.

Page 9: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

Yes“A block randomisation sequence stratified by centre was produced using a random number generator. The sequence was accessed via the internet, therefore allowing concealment of allocation.

Children were randomly assigned to oral amoxicillin (chosen in preference to oral penicillin owing to the superior absorption and palatability) or IV benzyl penicillin.”

So not double blind.

Page 10: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

• Yes….

Page 11: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

Page 12: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

• No.• Could have cannulated all, given placebo IV to the oral

group and oral placebo to the IV group…

Page 13: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

• Yes

Page 14: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

Page 15: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

Children in the IV group were changed to oral amoxicillin on discharge or sooner if the clinical team considered their improvement warranted this.

Both groups completed a 1-week course of antibiotics in total.

IV group more likely to require another antibiotic / rescue medication.

?Does this mean there was an inherent difference in the two groups?

Page 16: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

Page 17: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

• Time to temperature less than 38.5 • Length of time in oxygen• Time to discharge• Time to resolution of symptoms• Number of complications

Page 18: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

Page 19: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

Page 20: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

AnalysisTime in hospital and oxygen requirement

“The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the oral group than in the IV group (1.77 days (25th–75th centile 1.2–2.0) and 2.1 days (25th–75th centile 1.8–2.9),respectively, p,0.001). We also calculated the median of the differences and this was found to be 0.60 days (0.15–1.13) (IV– oral). “

OxygenDuring admission, 18/103 children (17.5%) in the IV group and 28/100

children (28%) in the oral group required oxygen (p=0.07). The duration of oxygen requirement was significantly longer in the IV group than in the oral group (median 20.5 vs 11.0 hours, p=0.04).

Children randomised to IV treatment received a median of 6 doses (25th–75th centile 4.7–7.5) of IV benzyl penicillin before conversion to oral amoxicillin.

Page 21: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

• For the primary outcome measure, all p values are for equivalence. Therefore, a p value of ,0.05 indicates that the null hypothesis (a difference of .20% exists between the two treatments) has been disproved.

Page 22: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

• Yes – Nottingham isn’t that far away (especially now they widened the M1).

Page 23: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

• ? Chest X-ray resolution? • ?Longer follow up? • ?Lung function?

Probably wouldn’t make a difference to the decision re: treatment.

Page 24: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Analysis

• The change in practise maybe to start oral amoxicillin in AAU and keep overnight. If remains well, then home, vs

• IV for 48 hours then home. So the benefit probably does outweigh the costs.

Page 25: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Summary• Oral antibiotics appear to be equivalent to IV antibiotics

for pneumonia• Pts on IV antibiotics appear to have more complications

Page 26: PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards.

Discussion• Would you encourage the team to change practice in

AAU?