Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

download Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

of 14

Transcript of Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    1/14

    Food Security and Agricultural Production

    in Low-Income Food-Deficit Countries:

    10 years after the Uruguay Round

    Prabhu Pingali and Randy StringerAgricultural and Development Economics DivisionFAO, United Nations, Rome

    Capri ConferenceJune 2003

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    2/14

    Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Food Prices

    Food Imports

    Food Aid

    Overall Food Security

    What are the Post Uruguay Round food securitytrends in the LIFDCs?

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    3/14

    Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Low-income food-deficit countries

    Classification

    1. LIFDC com dep - 23 countriesSingle commodity dependent exporters

    2. LIFDC others 49 countriesNon commodity dependent countries

    3. China

    4. India

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    4/14

    Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Dimensions of Food Security

    Availability Access Stability

    Domestic production

    Import capacity

    Food aid

    Income distribution /Poverty

    Markets and infrastructure

    capacity

    Weather variability

    Price variability

    Complex emergencies

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    5/14

    Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Food Security Status - Availability

    Per capita food

    consumption1999-01

    Kcal/cap/day

    % change in per capita food

    consumption

    88/91 to 99/01 96/98 to 99/01

    LIFDC com dep 2314 2.7 1.7

    LIFDC others 2285 3.0 3.1

    China 2972 12 0.8

    India 2493 7.6 1.2

    Source: Calculations based on FAO data

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    6/14

    Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Food Security Status - Availability

    Source: Calculations based on FAO data

    Import Capacity = Exports - Debt

    Food Imports

    Before UR1989-91

    After UR1998-2000

    LIFDC com dep 34.1% 27.8%

    LIFDC others 26.0% 23.2%

    China 5.9% 1.2%

    India 3.5% 2.4%

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    7/14Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Food Security Status - Availability

    High dependence on agricultural exports 1999-2001

    export earnings as % of merchandise exports

    Source: FAO

    92

    67

    56

    45

    42

    42

    38

    37

    32

    30

    28

    28

    28

    2827

    26

    25

    23

    23

    22

    19

    17

    88

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    BurundiGuinea-Bissau

    MalawiEthiopiaUgandaRwanda

    Burkina FasoKiribati

    BeninChadCuba

    Sao Tome and PrincipeKenya

    ComorosMali

    Vanuatu

    Cte d'Ivoire

    GhanaNicaragua

    AfghanistanTanzania

    GuatemalaHonduras

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

    price of coffee (/lb.)

    1985 = 100

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    8/14Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Food Security Status - Availability

    Wheat f.o.b.

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

    Rice f.o.b.

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

    Source: UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics 2002, CD-Rom

    Maize c.i.f.

    0

    40

    80

    120

    160

    90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

    Trends in real cereal prices (1982 = 100)

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    9/14Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Food Security Status - Availability

    Source: FAO

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01

    Cereal Aid (million tonnes)

    Import value at base year 1989-91 , quantity (billion US$)

    Food prices and food aid

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    10/14Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Food Security Status - Access

    Incidence of undernourishment

    LIFDC com dep36%

    106 million persons

    LIFDC others 22%249 million persons

    China9%

    119 million persons

    India24%

    233 million persons

    Source: Calculations based on FAO data

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    11/14Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Food Security Status - Access

    Source: Calculations based on FAO data

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    Sub-Saharan

    Africa

    South Asia Latin America and

    Caribbean

    East Asia

    1990 1999 2015

    Millions of persons in poverty (US$1/day)

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    12/14Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Food Security Status - Access

    Source: Calculations based on FAO data

    Percentage undernourished by trade status

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    13/14Pingali & Stringer, June 2003

    Food Security Status - Stability

    Coefficient of variationof food consumption

    Probability of shortfall inconsumption below 95%of trend for 1980-2001

    LIFDC com dep 8.5 22%

    LIFDC others 5.2 14.5%

    China 2.2 1%

    India 3.6 8%

    Source: Calculations based on FAO data

    Measures of consumption stability

  • 7/30/2019 Pingali - Food Security and Agricultural Production

    14/14Pingali & Stringer June 2003

    Common Arguments for Special Treatment

    Trade liberalisation damages food security

    Agriculture plays a special role in developing countries

    Low income country agricultural sectors lack the necessary institutional

    and capital support

    Food security is an important development need

    Low income producers in developing countries are too vulnerable to

    international price variations

    Special protection is justified because of the asymmetry of support