Physics Expectations at the LHC
-
Upload
haviva-harding -
Category
Documents
-
view
29 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Physics Expectations at the LHC
![Page 1: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Physics Expectations at the LHC
Sreerup Raychaudhuri
IPM String School 2008, Isfahan, Iran
Tata Institute of Fundamental ResearchMumbai, India
April 9, 2008
![Page 2: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Plan of the Lectures
1. About the LHC
(the six-billion dollar experiment…)
2. Standard Model of Particle Physics
(what we already know…)
3. Physics beyond the Standard Model
(what we would like to know…)
4. Physics Prospects at the LHC
(what we could find in the next few years…)
![Page 3: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Part 1
The Large Hadron Collider
(the biggest science experiment ever…)
![Page 4: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Energy timeline…
atoms
electronsnuclei
quarks
W, Z
cathode rays
?
mesons
Reach Planck scale in 2243?
![Page 5: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
LHC is the Biggest and most Expensive
Science Experiment ever attempted
Price Tag: US $ 6.1 billion (Viking missions US $ 0.93 b)
No of scientists: 7000+
![Page 6: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
8.6 Km
![Page 7: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Working Principle of a Collider Machine
![Page 8: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8.6 Km
![Page 9: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Buried 100 m below ground to shield radiation
![Page 10: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Section of LHC tunnel showing pipe carrying liquid He
![Page 11: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ATLAS Detector
![Page 12: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The CMS detector weighs 1950 tonnes
(= weight of 5 Jumbo jets …)
![Page 15: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Typical LHC Event
![Page 17: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
About
1 000 000 000
such events per second…
Unprecedentedcomputing challenge…
Worldwide distribution of analysts
Gb/s data transfer rates
![Page 18: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Actual Gb/s transfer rates as monitored by BARC, India during a test run in 2006
![Page 20: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
LHC Timeline
First LHC studies were done in 1982
Project was approved in 1994 ; final decision in 1996
Construction started in 2002
LHC is expected to start-up in summer 2008
All the components are already in place
The detectors are being calibrated with cosmic rays particles
Cooling all sectors down to 1.9 K by mid-June 2008
First collisions will start around mid-August 2008
By October-November 2008 collision energy should reach 10 TeV
Energy upgrade to 14 TeV by early 2009
Higgs boson discovery (?) by 2011
![Page 21: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Interesting factoids about LHC:• LHC when running will consume as much power as a medium-
sized European town
• LHC budget is comparable to the GDP of a small country, e.g. Fiji or Mongolia
• LHC vacuum is 100 times more tenuous then the medium in which typical communications satellites move
• LHC magnetic fields of 8.4 Tesla are 100,000 times the Earth’s
• LHC magnets will use 700,000 litres of liquid Helium and 12,000,000 litres of liquid Nitrogen
• LHC protons will have energies comparable to that of a flying mosquito
• LHC optical grid at 1.5 Gb/s could eventually make the Internet 300 times faster
![Page 22: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
What is this tremendous effort for?
What does the LHC hope to achieve?
Is success guaranteed?
We shall try to address, if not fully answer, these questions…
![Page 23: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Part 2
Standard Model of Particle Physics
(what we already know…)
![Page 24: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The Standard Model is a (partially) combined model of strong and electroweak interactions
Gravity is ignored…
Major ingredients:
1. Quark model
2. Non-Abelian gauge theory
• strong and electroweak sectors
3. Scalar 4 theory with Yukawa interactions
4. Parity violation in the weak sector
5. CP violation in the weak sector
![Page 25: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Note (and Apology) on metric choice:
Minkowski metric: 2 22 0ds dx dx dx dx
Particle mass: 2 2 2 2p E p m
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1
η
Curvature of a 4-sphere: 0
Bjorken & Drell 1964
Wick rotation
1c
![Page 26: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Gauge structure of the Standard Model
All gauge theories have QED as the basic template
1QED 4
iD m F F
D ieA
F A A
L: Covariant derivative
: Field-strength tensor
Expands out to:
1QED 4
F F i m Aei
L
free gauge free fermion interaction
e
![Page 27: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Invariance under local U(1) gauge transformations:
( )( ) '( ) ( )
( ) ' ( ) ( )
ie xx x e x
A x A x A x e
: First kind
: Second kind
1QED 4
iD m F F L D ieA
F A A
( )' i xeD D e D
Conservation of Nöther current & Nöther charge:
3 0
0 ;
0 ; ( )
J J e
QQ d x J x e
t
electromagnetic current
electric charge
No other renormalizable terms
![Page 28: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Hermann Weyl (1885 – 1955)
This gauge symmetry gives its form to the QED Lagrangian and hence it is solely responsible for all the observed electromagnetic phenomena…
Extension of this idea: the form of strong and weak (nuclear) interactions are also dictated by gauge symmetries…
![Page 29: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Scalar electrodynamicsCharged scalar field :
( )( ) '( ) ( )i xex x e x
* 2 *QED D D M
L L
Expands out to:
* 2 * * 2 *sED M ie A e A A
�
L
sEDL
free scalar pair interaction
seagull interaction
1 2e k k
2ie
Nöther current
![Page 30: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Non-gauge InteractionsScalar field allows us to add on two more types of
renormalizable (gauge-invariant) interactions, viz.
1. Scalar self-interactions:
2*sED +LL
2. Yukawa interactions:
QED sED 1 2 H.c.h + +L L L
Requires at least two differently-charged fermion species
4 type
1 2 0e e e
![Page 31: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Q. QED works fine. Why do we need a scalar field at all?
The gauge boson (photon) must be massless for gauge invariance
1 12 2mass 2 2A AM A A M A e A e
L
Q. Why do we want the photon to have a mass?
Needed in a superconducting medium (not otherwise)
1 1 24 2 AF F M A A
L 2AF M A
Static limit : 0 00 ; 0 0A A E
2 2 ij ji A AF M A B M A
2 2 2 A AB M B B M B
Skin effect
![Page 32: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
A self-interacting scalar field can generate a mass for the photon in a renormalizable and ‘gauge-invariant’ way.
Trick is to utilize the scalar self-interaction…
* *2D
*E
*
2
s
( )
D D
D D V
L
For real the (x) field is tachyonic
improper choice of generalised coordinates
need to re-define coordinates
Ginzburg & Landau 1950
![Page 33: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Physical vacuum corresponds to the minimum of the potential :
22 * *( )V
V()
0
It is simple to show that and is arbitrary2
0 2
0arg
Vacuum choice leads to spontaneous breaking of the U(1) gauge symmetry
![Page 34: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
V()
0
After choosing the unique vacuum point = 0 , we are still free to choose the argument of …
Equivalent to rotation of axes in complex plane : re-parametrization
Common choice is to set : “unitary” gauge choice arg 0
![Page 35: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Proper choice of generalized coordinate is to replace :
002
v
Note that : 1 11 22 2
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )x x i x x
0
1( ) 0
2 2
vx v i
2
2v
This shifting breaks the gauge symmetry spontaneously…
Consequences:
1. Generates mass for the gauge boson
2. Generates real mass for the scalar
3. Causes fermions to mix through their Yukawa coupling
![Page 36: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
*kineticsED
v v
2 2
v v
2 2
D D
ie A
ie A
L1. Gauge boson mass :
2 21v ...
2e A A
Gauge boson thus acquires a mass :
2 2
v2A
eM e
Short-range interaction
![Page 37: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
2. Scalar mass :2 4
2
22 2
2 22
22
v v
2 2
6v ...2 4
6 ...2 4 2
...4
( )V
Collect quadratic terms
Scalar thus acquires a real mass :
2M
Other scalar (imaginary part) vanished from the theory by choice of “unitary” gauge
![Page 38: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
3. Fermion mixing :
fermion 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
1 2
1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2
v2
v2
H.c.
H.c. ...h
iD m iD m
h
m m
L
mass terms only
Break up into chiral components:
1 15 52 2 L R
L R R L
mass 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2
1 2 1 2v2
L R R L
L R R L
L R R Lh
m
m
L
mixing term
![Page 39: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
More convenient in matrix form :
1 1mass 1 2
22
v2
v2
H.c.
RL L
R
h
h
m
m
L
Again 1 and 2 are improper choices of coordinates
because they lead to coupled equations of motion
diagonalise the matrix for (decoupled) eigenstates
1 2
1 2
cos sin
sin cosa C C
b C C
where1 2
2 vtan C
h
m m
fermion mixing
violation of global U(1) flavor symmetries
![Page 40: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Some technical terms:
• Generation of gauge boson masses by a self-interacting tachyonic scalar field
Anderson-Higgs Mechanism
• Residual massive scalar field Higgs Boson
• Imaginary part of scalar Goldstone Boson
• Fermion mixing from Yukawa interactions and spontaneous symmetry-breaking
Kobayashi-Maskawa Mechanism
• Fermion mixing angle C Cabibbo Angle
Peter W. Higgs (b. 1929)
![Page 41: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Application of gauge theoretic ideas to strong and (weak) nuclear interactions :
Traditional picture of nucleus… Rutherford-Curie-Chadwick
Coulombic repulsion is overcome by strong nuclear interaction within a range of ~ 1 fm ; beyond 1 fm the repulsion causes instability and radioactive decay…
Weizäcker’s semi-empirical mass formula
Yukawa picture : exchange of mesons
![Page 42: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
This is only an effective picture since protons and neutrons (also pions) are composites made up of quarks and gluons…
Effective (Yukawa) theory with scalar exchange
Fundamental (gauge) theory with vector exchange
QCD
Murray Gell-Mann (b. 1929)
![Page 43: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
QCD : The gauge theory of strong interactions
Each quark carries one of three possible “colors”:
q q qGauge symmetry is a symmetry under mixing of these three “colors” :
1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3
R
R
R
B
B
GB
G
G
q U U U
q U U U
q U U U
q
q
q
'i i ij jq q U q
†
det 1
U U 1
U
SU(3)
![Page 44: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
1QCD 4
( ) ( ) Tr
( )
,
q
S
S
x i m x
ig x
ig
q D q G G
D 1 G
G G G G G
L
1QED 4
iD m F F
D ieA
F A A
L
QCD Lagrangian is constructed on the exact analogy of the QED Lagrangian :
1
2
where
a a
a a
G
G T
T λ
Gell-Mann matrices
Gluons
1,2,...,8a
![Page 45: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Expands out to:
1QCD 4
1
2
1 24
v aai i q i i a v a
S i a jij
S abc a v a b c
S abc dec a b d e
iq q m q q G G G G
ig q T q
g f G G G G
g f f G G G G
Lfree quark free gluons
vertex: quark-antiquark-gluon
3-gluon vertex
4-gluon vertex
Similar to QED interaction…
Gluon self-interactions are typical of a non-Abelian (multiple-charge) theory ,a b abc cT T if T
![Page 46: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
QCD Feynman rules
ij
q
i
k m i
quark propagator gluon propagator
2
abi
k i
1 2 3 1 23
1 2 cyclicS a a aig f k k
1
2
3
3-gluon vertex
S a ijig T
qqg vertex
4-gluon vertex
1
2
3
4
1 2 3 4 1 4 2 3 1 3 2 4
2 2 3
2 4
a a b a a b
S
f f
ig
![Page 47: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
QCD coupling gS is large since the interaction is strong
However, it runs at higher energies due to quantum corrections…e.g. vertex corrections…
2 2 22
22
QCD 2
( ) ( )( )
41 4 ( ) log
S SS
S
g QQ
Qb
2 2 2QCD 2
1( ) 33 2 ( )
48 qq
b Q Q m
+ …
![Page 48: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Since there are only 6 known quark flavors
2 22
2
QCD 2
( ) 1( )
44 log
SS
g QQ
Qb
Introduce the QCD scale :
2 2 2QCD 2 2
1 33 12( ) 33 2 ( ) 0
48 48qq
b Q Q m
2QCD
1
4 ( )sbe
As Q2 increases above 2, the QCD coupling decreases…
asymptotic freedom Politzer-Gross-Wilczek 1973
![Page 49: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
S
(EC
M)
![Page 50: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Quark confinement :
Free colored states have not been observed in Nature
Conjecture: only color singlets form stable states
x
( )V x
Open problem : to obtain a confining potential from the QCD Lagrangian
![Page 51: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Weak interaction sector is the most intriguing part of the Standard Model
The gauge theory of electroweak interactions
n
p
e-
e-udd
u d u
-decay : Fermi
-decay : quark picture
e-
d
u
W--decay : intermediate vector boson
Interaction must be of short-range nature, i.e. W bosons must be massive
![Page 52: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
To accommodate charged gauge bosons, we must have a non-Abelian theory…
Sheldon L. Glashow (b. 1932)
Choice of gauge group: SU(2) U(1)Acts on a complex scalar doublet :
1
2
† U U 11 11 12 1
2 21 22 2
'
'
U U
U U
![Page 53: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
† 2 †GSW
1 1
4 4
'2
Tr Tr
( ) ( )
,
g
M
B B
i g x B x
ig
B B B
D D
W W
D 1 W 1
W W W W W
L
Electroweak Lagrangian is again constructed on the analogy of the QED/QCD Lagrangian :
31 21 2 3( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2 2 2x W x W x W x
σσ σW
Generators of SU(2)SU(2) “charge” weak isospin
U(1) “charge” weak hypercharge
![Page 54: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
![Page 55: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
31 21 2 3
1 13 1 22 2
1 11 2 32 2
1 132 2
1 1322
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2 2 2
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
x W x W x W x
W x W x iW x
W x iW x W x
W x W x
W x W x
σσ σW
'
2
'32 2 2
'3 222
132 2
1322
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) 0
0 ( )( ) ( )
( ) ' ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ' ( )
g
g g g
gg g
g
g
g x B x
W x W x B x
B xW x W x
gW x g B x W x
W x gW x g B x
W 1
![Page 56: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Mass arises from spontaneous symmetry-breaking and Higgs mechanism :
†
22 † †
( )
( )
V
V
D DL
Vacuum at :
2 2v†42
Vacuum manifold has an SO(4) symmetry
2
2 2 2 2
1 1 2 2
vRe Im Re Im
2
Choice of vacuum leaves a residual O(2) symmetry unbroken U(1)em
Abdus Salam (1926 – 1996)
Steven Weinberg (b. 1933)
![Page 57: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
†kinetic
†'† †2
'
2
g
g
i g B
i g B
D D
W 1
W 1
L
Shift the vacuum :
2
v
0
Pick out the mass terms and expand…
1 2 2
mass 8
1 2 2 23 3 38
2 22 2
2
vv8 8cos
v
v 2 ' '
W
gg
g W W
g W W gg W B g B B
W W Z Z
L
3 cos sinW WZ W B 3 sin cosW WA W B
'tan W
g
g
1
2
cos
v
0
W
MWZ
W
M g
M
M
![Page 58: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
After shifting the scalar field:
1 1 2 2 3 3( ) ( ) ( )1 1 2
2 2 2
( )
0( )
ix x xr i
r iH x
ix e
i
σ σ σ
Freedom to re-parametrize, i.e. choose the “unitary” gauge
1 2 2( ) ( ) ( ) 0x x x
2
( )
0( ) H xx
22 ...
4( ) HV
as before…
massive Higgs boson
not (yet) found
![Page 59: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Fermionic sector of the Glashow-Salam-Weinberg model
e-e -
u d
sc
-
b
tI
IIIII
![Page 60: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
A little bit of history : Parity violation in weak interactions
• By 1955 it was established that o , have
intrinsic parity P = -1
• Cosmic ray experiments had found two particles, both having mass 498 MeV and decay lifetime 12.4 ns, of which one decayed to
+ + o (P = +1 state)
and one decayed to
+ + - + + (P = -1 state)
• Yang and Lee (1956) conjectured that (a) both are decay modes of the same particle – the K+ (b) P is violated in weak interactions (c) 3 is parity-conserving decay; 2 is parity-violating decay
![Page 61: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
• The 1957 Co-60 experiment of Wu, Amblers et al established that P-violation does indeed happen in weak interactions
• Did not establish the extent of P-violation, e.g.
+
1 15 52 2
H.c.2We
ge e WA B
L
1A B If A = B parity is conserved
If A = 0 or B = 0, parity is maximally
violated
• Goldhaber et al, later in 1957, proved that for inverse -decay, B = 0.
• V – A form of weak interactions suggested by Marshak &
Sudarshan (1956) and by Feynman and Gell-Mann (1956).
![Page 62: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Parity violation is accommodated in the Standard Model by making the left and right chiral fermions transform differently under SU(2)…
Doublets :
eL
Le
L
L
L
L
L
L
u
d
L
L
c
s
L
L
t
b
Re
Singlets :
R R
Ru
RdRc
RsRt
Rb
eR R R
![Page 63: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Lepton gauge couplings:
1,2,3
2
'lepton 2 2
2cos2
54cossin sin
' H.c.
H.c.
( 1 4 )
a
W W
g ga L L R R
g gL L L L
W
g
W
aL L
g
L L gL L
e W Z
e eZ e eA
W B Be e
σL
eLL
L
Le
52(1 )ig e
W
52cos(1 )
W
ig
Z
2
54cossin(1 4 )
WW
ig
eZ
e ie
e
e
Similarly in the Quark sector…
![Page 64: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Lepton masses:
An electron mass term breaks up into combinations of left and right chiral terms…
1 15 52 2
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )L Re x e x e x e x e x
mass ( ) ( )e
e L R L R
e L R R L
m e x e x
m e e e e
m e e e e
L
If eL has T3 = -1/2 and eR has T3 = 0, this mass term is not gauge invariant…
Hence the requirement of parity-violation and electroweak gauge symmetry make all Standard Model fermions massless… massive
![Page 65: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Lepton Yukawa couplings:
single
Yukaw
t
a H.c.L Rh L e
L
0
2 2
v
2
v
H.c.
H.c.
H.c.
L L R
L R
L R L Rh h
h e e
h e e
e e e e
Electron mass term
v
2e
hm
v2e eh m
Similarly for the muon and the tau masses
![Page 66: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Quark Yukawa couplings:
single
Yukaw
t
a H.c.L RhQ d
L
By analogy with the leptons
*2
singlet
' H.c.L Rh Q i u
v
2d
hm ' v
2u
hm
No constraint to restrict to one generation only…
*Yukawa 2
v v
2 2Yukawa terms
' H.c.
+ ' H.c.
ij i j ij i j
ij i j
L R L R
ij iR RjL L
h Q d h Q i u
h d d h u u
L
![Page 67: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
mass H.c.
' ' '
' ' ' H.c.
' ' '
dd ds db R
L L sd ss sb RL
bd bs bb R
uu uc ut R
L L L cu cc ct R
tu tc tt R
M M M d
d s b M M M s
M M M b
M M M u
u c t M M M c
M M M t
L
†d dR RV V †d d
L LV V
†u uR RV V †u u
L LV V
Kobayashi-Maskawa mechanism: v
2ij ijM h
v' '
2ij ijM h
diag
onal
izat
ion
Physical states
![Page 68: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
In terms of the physical states the charged current interactions are no longer diagonal…
†
CC H.c.2
H.c.2
H.c.2
u
L
L L
dL
L L
L
L
L L L L
L
L
L L L L
L
L
dg
u c t s W
b
dg
u c t sV W
b
dg
u c t s W
V
b
K
L
Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix †u d
L LV VK
![Page 69: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
In terms of the physical states the neutral current interactions remain diagonal…
0NC
0†
0
H.c.2
H.c.2
H.c.2
u
Lu
L L L L
L
L
L L Lu
L L L
L
L
L L L L
L
ug
u c t c ZLt
ug
u c t c ZLt
ug
u c t c ZLt
V V
c
c
c
1
L
No Flavor Changing Neutral
Currents
![Page 70: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
CP-violation:
We can take the and the to be complex ijh 'ijhv
2ij ijM h
v' '
2ij ijM h
Also complex complex
,,u dL RV
CKM matrix K can also be complex
CP is violated
Note that there is no explanation for the CP violating phases; they are just accommodated… like parity violation…
![Page 71: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Experimental tests:
Hundreds of tests till date … cross-sections, decay widths, branching fractions,…
QCD tests: DIS results, three-jet events,
line-shape fits, parton-density fits, etc.
Electroweak tests: Neutral currents, W,Z discovery,
precision tests at LEP and SLD, HERA, Tevatron, Babar and BELLE, …
Everything agrees with Standard Model within experimental errors…
![Page 72: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
QCD tests:
Three-jet events in pair annihilatione e
e q
qe
Gluons exist !!
Three-jet event seen at LEP in 1992…
g
![Page 73: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Hadronic final states at different energies
P. Schleper, Aachen 2003
QCD fits are amazingly good
![Page 74: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
pp ,e
QCD is tested to at least 2( )SO
![Page 75: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
s globalBethke 2002
s from QCD fits
s from hadr. processses
Very impressive success of QCD
Limited everywhere by missing higher orders
P. Schleper, Aachen 2003
![Page 76: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Electroweak precision tests:
The LEP Collider at CERN, Geneva (1991-2001) was a electron-positron collider running at an energy between 90 – 210 GeV.
Precision electroweak tests at LEP have established the Standard Model results to accuracy of (for some variables) 1 in 100,000…
Z-boson parameters
Light neutrino species:
Weinberg angle:
Universality of gauge couplings is tested at per mille level
![Page 77: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Altarelli and Grünewald, Phys. Rep. 2004
![Page 78: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
‘Measurement’ is the direct result from the LEP data at the Z-pole
‘SM fit’ is a minimum 2 -fit to all the LEP observables using all the SM variables….
… including the mass of the Higgs boson
Altarelli and Grünewald, Phys. Rep. 2004
![Page 79: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Altarelli and Grünewald, Phys. Rep. 2004
Dependence of loop corrections on MH is always logarithmic
114 GeV 237 GeVHM at 68% C.L.
480 GeV
![Page 80: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
CP Violation : fits to the Unitarity Triangle (2006)
Area of the triangle ~ sin
![Page 81: Physics Expectations at the LHC](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103100/568137e3550346895d9f8f8c/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
The Higgs Boson is the only missing piece…