Photovoltaics for the Terawatt Challenge
description
Transcript of Photovoltaics for the Terawatt Challenge
1
Photovoltaics for the Terawatt Challenge
Christiana HonsbergDepartment of Electrical Computer and Energy Engineering Director, QESST ERCArizona State University
Outline
• Terawatt Challenge– What is it?– Photovoltaics for the TW challenges
• Importance of rapid growth• Recent milestones in PV
– But what about ….. • Myths of photovoltaics: land area; efficiency; energy
payback time; materials availability; time to impact; duck curves, etc
• Future prospects• Education
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 2
Terawatt Challenge
• Terawatt Challenge: Encapsulates the dichotomy surrounding energy– essential for improved quality of life, but also tied among the most serious global challenges.
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 3
3
Terawatt Challenge
• Why is compound annual growth rate important?
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 4
4
Terawatt Challenge
• In the nearly two decades since the TW challenge paper, renewables have reached multiple milestones
• In US, renewable compound annual growth rate 4.8% from 2000-2012 (NREL data)
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 5
5
NREL,2012 Renewable Energy Data Book
Photovoltaic Milestones
• Germany, Spain, Italy have yearly installed PV capacity > yearly increase in electricity demand.
• In Germany, PV is 50% of summer peak electricity demand
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 6
6
Learning Curves for Photovoltaics
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 7
7
• PV learning curves show compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of ~30% over the last several decades
• Extending the growth rates shows ability of PV (renewables more generally if these are included) to make a substantial impact on electricity generations
Potential for PV in the US
Photovoltaic Milestones
• ASU – reached 50% of total electricity supplied by PV
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 9
9
Arizona Context
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 10
10
Photovoltaics “FAQ”
• Energy payback time
• Land use
• Cost
• What do you do at night for power?
• Materials availability– For silicon, limitation is silver
in grids, which cause a limitation at 2 TW
– Availability subject to efficiency, thickness
APS Tutorial Nanostructured Photovoltaics C. Honsberg 11 11
Duck Curves
• Power after sun goes down a concern for utilities.
• Can mitigate by load management.
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 12
12
PV for the Terawatt Challenge
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 13
13
• PV technology must be high efficiency, efficient use of materials, scalable, reliable, and enable path for future improvements
• High efficiency; overcome limits; thin
Present State of PV: efficiencies
APS Tutorial Nanostructured Photovoltaics C. Honsberg 15
Fraction of Efficiency Achieved
Types of PV Systems
• Optical configuration of photovoltaic systems: One-sun or flat plate; concentrating systems; tracking
APS Tutorial Nanostructured Photovoltaics C. Honsberg 16 16
Scope of QESST ERC
APS Tutorial Nanostructured Photovoltaics C.Honsberg 18
Multiple Junction (Tandem) Solar Cells
• Concentration or stacking multiple solar cells increases efficiency
• To reach >50% efficiency, need ideal bandgap 6-stack tandem, (assuming ~75% of detailed balance limit).
• Hard to get compatible materials with the right bandgaps.
APS Tutorial Nanostructured Photovoltaics C.Honsberg 19 19
What do efficiency calculations tell us?
Approaches to high efficiency:1. Concentrate sunlight. “One sun” = 1kW/m2, max
concentration ~46,000.• No entropy penalty for concentrating sunlight, but
etendue limits to acceptance angle and concentration.
2. Optically split solarspectrum (i.e. tandem)– No entropy penalty– Efficiency controlled by
existence of materials
3. Beneficially circumventone of the assumptionsin thermodynamics
# junctions in solar cell
1 junction
2 junction
3 junction
1 sun
30.8%
42.9%
49.3%
junction 68.2%
Max con.
40.8%
55.7%
63.8%
86.8%
APS Tutorial Nanostructured Photovoltaics C.Honsberg20 20
Tandem Solar Cells
• Key issue for III-Vs: need precisely controlled band gaps which are lattice matched
• “Missing” low band gap material• Approaches:
– Lattice matched; Ge-GaAs-GaInP– Metamorphic;Ge-GaInAs-GaInP– Metamorphic; GaInAs-GaAs-GaInP
• Band gaps for 4-tandem arepoorly lattice matched;5 band gapsand six band-gaps are better matched
APS Tutorial Nanostructured Photovoltaics C.Honsberg21 21
Ge-based tandem solar cells
• Metamorphic solar cell reached 40.7% at ~200X.
Carrier-Selective Contacts
Carrier-selective contacts enable ideal VOC
22
CSC Implementation: a-Si/c-Si solar cell
Demonstrated 746 mV on 50 µm wafers
23
APS Tutorial Nanostructured Photovoltaics C.Honsberg24 24
InAs QDs on GaAsSb barriers
• InAs QDs achieved on GaAsSb material• Increasing Sb composition decreases QD
size and increases QD density
InAs QDs on GaAs (5 ML) / GaAs1-xSbx (5nm) buffer layers with x = 23%, with density 2.6 x 106 cm-2
InAs QDs on GaAs
Experimental GaAsSb/InAs QD material
• Doping of QD layers to control occupancy of the QD.
GaAsSb (20nm)
GaAsSb (20nm)
S.I. GaAs substrate
InAs QDsδ-doping
GaAs (50nm)
(b)
(c) 8nm
GaAsSb/GaAs interface
APS Tutorial Nanostructured Photovoltaics C.Honsberg 26 26
Tandem Solar Cells
• Monolithic III-V tandem solar cells; Series connected; three junctions
• High efficiency used in high concentration, two-axis tracking systems
• High concentration meanssmall area (and lower cost) needed for solarcells
• Trade balance of systemsand solar cell cost.
Experimental GaAsSb/InAs QD material
0 50 100 150 20080
90
100
110
120
130
140 Sample 1 (undoped) Sample 2 (2 electrons per dot) Sample 3 (4 electrons per dot) Sample 4 (6 electrons per dot)
F
WH
M (
meV
)
Temperature (K)
(d)
0 50 100 150 200 250
1.06
1.08
1.10
1.12
1.14
1.16
Sample 1 (undoped) Sample 2 (2 electrons per dot) Sample 3 (4 electrons per dot) Sample 4 (6 electrons per dot)
En
erg
y (e
V)
Temperature (K)
(c)
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014C. Honsberg 28
28
Path for Continual Improvement
• Ideal solar cell consists of a light-trapped, thin solar cell
• Nanostructured surfaces allow light trapping and advanced concepts (e.g., multiple exciton devices)
Student Led Pilot Line• Silicon pilot line capabilities for interaction
among students, industry and researchers• 10 Fulton Undergraduate Research Initiative
Projects• 2 honors thesis• 4 capstone projects
ASU-UA-NAU Student Solar Conference 04/01/2014 C. Honsberg 30
30
Questions?