Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven ... filephotovoltaic deployment : from...

40
HAL Id: hal-00749385 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00749385 Submitted on 7 Nov 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés. Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach Anna Créti, Léonide Michael Sinsin To cite this version: Anna Créti, Léonide Michael Sinsin. Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach. cahier de recherche 2012-32. 2012. <hal-00749385>

Transcript of Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven ... filephotovoltaic deployment : from...

HAL Id: hal-00749385https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00749385

Submitted on 7 Nov 2012

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open accessarchive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come fromteaching and research institutions in France orabroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documentsscientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,émanant des établissements d’enseignement et derecherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoirespublics ou privés.

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to amarket-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

Anna Créti, Léonide Michael Sinsin

To cite this version:Anna Créti, Léonide Michael Sinsin. Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-drivengrowth: A panel econometrics approach. cahier de recherche 2012-32. 2012. <hal-00749385>

PHOTOVOLTAIC DEPLOYMENT : FROM SUBSIDIES TO A MARKET-DRIVEN GROWTH : A PANEL ECONOMETRICS APPROACH

Anna CRETI

Léonide Michael SINSIN

Cahier n° 2012-32

ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE

DEPARTEMENT D'ECONOMIE Route de Saclay

91128 PALAISEAU CEDEX (33) 1 69333033

http://www.economie.polytechnique.edu/ mailto:[email protected]

∗∗

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

Series: PCAPSample 2009Q1 2011Q4Observations 48

Mean        1.214713Median    1.254714Maximum   1.539921Minimum   0.646312Std. Dev.    0.249312Skewness   ­0.583199Kurtosis    2.196509

Jarque­Bera  4.012161Probability  0.134515

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

Series: CAPSample 2009Q1 2011Q4Observations 48

Mean        0.960943Median    0.885204Maximum   1.692099Minimum   0.096713Std. Dev.    0.466367Skewness    0.192064Kurtosis    2.188627

Jarque­Bera  1.611760Probability  0.446695

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6

Series: PRODSample 2009Q1 2011Q4Observations 48

Mean        2.508079Median    2.333437Maximum   3.562189Minimum   1.851258Std. Dev.    0.485045Skewness    1.092839Kurtosis    2.825001

Jarque­Bera  9.615632Probability  0.008166

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2.05 2.10 2.15 2.20 2.25 2.30 2.35 2.40 2.45

Series: MODULESample 2009Q1 2011Q4Observations 48

Mean        2.287031Median    2.309230Maximum   2.468347Minimum   2.053144Std. Dev.    0.122914Skewness   ­0.530992Kurtosis    2.276397

Jarque­Bera  3.302826Probability  0.191779

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

2009 2010 2011

 1

1.64

1.68

1.72

1.76

1.80

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

2009 2010 2011

 2

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

2009 2010 2011

 3

.45

.50

.55

.60

.65

.70

.75

.80

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

2009 2010 2011

 4

MCAP

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8

Series: MCAPSample 2009Q1 2011Q4Observations 48

Mean        0.952346Median    0.752265Maximum   1.796017Minimum   0.408054Std. Dev.    0.462922Skewness    0.898852Kurtosis    2.171048

Jarque­Bera  7.837794Probability  0.019863

­12

­10

­8

­6

­4

­2

0

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

2009 2010 2011

 1

­.28

­.27

­.26

­.25

­.24

­.23

­.22

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

2009 2010 2011

 2

­1.8

­1.6

­1.4

­1.2

­1.0

­0.8

­0.6

­0.4

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

2009 2010 2011

 3

­1.0

­0.8

­0.6

­0.4

­0.2

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

2009 2010 2011

 4

B

Dependent Variable: PROD     Method: Panel Least Squares     Date: 09/21/12   Time: 12:33     Sample: 2009Q1 2011Q4     Periods included: 12     Cross­sections included: 4     Total panel (balanced) observations: 48   

                  

Variable  Coefficient  Std. Error  t­Statistic  Prob.                     

MODULE  ­0.110894  0.297559  ­3.372679  0.0711 PCAP  1.782311  0.601552  2.962855  0.0050 WCAP  ­1.836926  0.789432  ­2.326896  0.0249 CAP  1.439234  0.668334  2.153465  0.0371 

MCAP  0.894005  0.814940  1.397019  0.1279 B  ­0.577727  0.024911  ­1.610174  0.1250                   

R­squared  0.852494      Mean dependent var  ­0.042852 Adjusted R­squared  0.861124      S.D. dependent var  0.425102 S.E. of regression  0.165093      Akaike info criterion  0.298999 Sum squared resid  2.951527      Schwarz criterion  0.532899 Log likelihood  ­1.175969      Hannan­Quinn criter.  0.387390 Durbin­Watson stat  1.943774       

                  

Dependent Variable: RES2^2 Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/20/12 Time: 11:27 Sample: 2009Q1 2011Q4 Periods included: 12 Cross-sections included: 4 Total panel (balanced) observations: 48 Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. MCAP^2 -0.000652 0.006362 -0.102553 0.9188 B^2 9.55E-06 4.30E-05 0.222166 0.8252 MODULE^2 0.014192 0.030488 0.465487 0.6438 R-squared -0.664139 Mean dependent var 0.003559 Adjusted R-squared -0.738100 S.D. dependent var 0.004360 S.E. of regression 0.005749 Akaike info criterion -7.419214 Sum squared resid 0.001487 Schwarz criterion -7.302264 Log likelihood 181.0611 Hannan-Quinn criter. -7.375018 Durbin-Watson stat 1.995618

Dependent Variable: RES2 Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/20/12 Time: 11:59 Sample (adjusted): 2009Q2 2011Q4 Periods included: 11 Cross-sections included: 4 Total panel (balanced) observations: 44

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C -0.001323 0.008406 -0.157449 0.8756

RES2(-1) 0.512306 0.145489 3.521272 0.0010 R-squared 0.227932 Mean dependent var 0.002024

Adjusted R-squared 0.209549 S.D. dependent var 0.062310 S.E. of regression 0.055399 Akaike info criterion -2.904139 Sum squared resid 0.128898 Schwarz criterion -2.823039 Log likelihood 65.89105 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.874063 F-statistic 12.39935 Durbin-Watson stat 1.891035 Prob(F-statistic) 0.001049

Dependent Variable: PROD     Method: Panel Least Squares     Date: 09/25/12   Time: 13:37     Sample: 2009Q1 2011Q4     Periods included: 12     Cross­sections included: 5     Total panel (balanced) observations: 60                     Variable  Coefficient  Std. Error  t­Statistic  Prob.                     C  ­0.249642  0.197953  ­1.261121  0.2128 CAPACITY  1.064859  0.085239  12.49265  0.0000 PRICE  ­0.095821  0.106322  ­2.901232  0.0315                     Effects Specification                       Cross­section fixed (dummy variables)                     R­squared  0.931898      Mean dependent var  2.055392 Adjusted R­squared  0.924188      S.D. dependent var  0.266278 S.E. of regression  0.073317      Akaike info criterion  ­2.278776 Sum squared resid  0.284893      Schwarz criterion  ­2.034436 Log likelihood  75.36327      Hannan­Quinn criter.  ­2.183201 F­statistic  120.8741      Durbin­Watson stat  1.836766 Prob(F­statistic)  0.000000