Philosophy of Law essay set #1 (Bohman)
6
Batool Alsamadi Phil of Law – Dr. Bohman March 6, 2007 [due] Essay Set I I. The acts committed by the Grudge Informers were certainly unjust and inhumane, in that they acted out of desire, with murderous intent, by using the court and laws as instruments for expedient means as ways to fulfill their illicit motives. I find that the following considerations given by the First Deputy and Second Deputy provide the most reasonable argument(s) for the resolution of the Purple Shirts dispute. First, I will go through the First Deputy and Second Deputy to show why their arguments are valid for a resolution; I will then go through the other Deputies’ arguments to show how their suggestions yield as legally invalid. The First Deputy suggested the actions of the Grudge Informers to have been “in the law of the land” at the time they were committed. Further, the First Deputy points out that all the actions the Grudge Informers reported were considered unlawful according to the rules of the government at the time. I give credit to the First Deputy’s reasoning by expanding on the opposition of Dworkin’s take on positivism. It would be unfair to deprive a defendant on the terms of laws that were not given reasonable notice of liability.
description
I got an \\\"A\\\" on this paper, the topic of the popular-discussed \\\"Grudge Informer\\\" topic in Philosophy of Law (Dr. Bohman)
Transcript of Philosophy of Law essay set #1 (Bohman)
Invalid document format
