Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

20
Philadelphia, May 2– 4, 2005 www.locationintellige How OGC Location Service Standards Enable Integration with Enterprise IT Carl Reed, PhD CTO, Open Geospatial Consortium May 2, 2005

description

Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 www.locationintelligence.net. How OGC Location Service Standards Enable Integration with Enterprise IT Carl Reed, PhD CTO, Open Geospatial Consortium May 2, 2005. What is the OGC?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Page 1: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005

www.locationintelligence.net

How OGC Location Service Standards

Enable Integration with Enterprise IT

Carl Reed, PhDCTO, Open Geospatial Consortium

May 2, 2005

Page 2: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

What is the OGC?

• The Open Geospatial Consortium, inc. (OGC) is a non-profit international voluntary consensus standards organization that is leading the development of standards for geospatial and location based services.

– The OGC facilitates a consensus process in which government, private industry, and academia collaborate to create open and extensible software application programming interfaces for geospatial and other mainstream information technologies

Page 3: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

The OGC vision enables a global geospatial and IT community

Composed of many collaborating organizations... authoring and publishing Composed of many collaborating organizations... authoring and publishing open standards for geospatial interoperabilityopen standards for geospatial interoperability

Page 4: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Some OGC Members providing solutions in LBS space

• Autodesk• Oracle• MapInfo• Intergraph• ESRI• Navteq• TeleAtlas• Ionic Enterprises• CPdQ• Webraska• TelContar• Northrup Grumman• Boeing

• Ordnance Survey• DeLorem• Mobile GIS• FEMA• NGA• Others

Page 5: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

What is Spatial Interoperability?

• Interoperability is the ability to:– Link business processes across organisational lines and

cost-effectively share information resources, – Find data, information and processing tools no matter

where they are physically located, and– Seamlessly operate no matter what type of computer

system or display device is being used, whether local or remote

• Also known as “on demand access”– Real time– As and when needed– Vendor and content model independent– Accessing the source of operational data

“My stuff operates with your stuff, and I don’t care where it is, how it works

and what the format is”

Page 6: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

“Invisible Success” of the enabling framework

MIC alert: storm warning for Liverpool area. Take precautions to protect your home and car from damage.

Page 7: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

OGC Standards and the Location Services Market

Page 8: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

The OGC OpenLS Interface Suite• OGC - Open Location Services – Core Interfaces

defined as XML for Location Services (XLS) Supports both HTTP and SOAP.– OpenLS ADTs– OpenLS Directory Service– OpenLS Geocoder – OpenLS Reverse Geocoder– OpenLS Presentation Service– OpenLS Route Service– OpenLS Gateway Service (Interface to OMA MLP)

• And of course GML (Geography Markup Language) for encoding payloads of geospatial content.

Page 9: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Role of OpenLS in LS Server Architecture

Provide Subscribers with Location-Based Application Services / Content

On the go

At work or home

Portal &Service

Platforms

GeoMobility Server

GMLC/MPC

Internet

•Navigation•Discovery•Presentation

•Maps•Routes•Directories•Points of Interest•Addresses

CORENETWORK

MobileSwitch

Position Determination Methods:LDT/PDE: cell/ID/sector, A-GPS,

E-OTD, AOA, TDOA, TOA

Page 10: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Example LBS Technology Providers Using OpenLS Interfaces

• Hutchison 3G – Location Enabled Application• Autodesk – LocationLogic• ESRI – Arc Location Services• TelContar – Drill Down Server version 3.2• Oracle - Oracle 9iAS Wireless Version 9.0.3 and Oracle

Application Server 10g  Wireless Edition(Version 9.0.4)• Ionic Enterprise – RedSpider Lobos (LOcation Based

OGC Solution)• MapInfo – Envinsa 3.0 (SOAP and HTTP)

Page 11: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Implementations of OpenLS• Intergraph – Will be part of next release of LocationServer

and GeoMedia WebMap• Webraska - SmartZone Geospatial Platform (Java and

SOAP)• LBS research Team, Telematics Research Division, ETRI,

South Korea• SAM (Mobile Services and Applications) is a CPqD Project

that aims to develop Location Based Services to public administration (Presentation, Gateway, and Geocoding)

• Sprint – Mobility Framework• Verizon• Others . . .

Page 12: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Example Application that Uses Standard Interfaces

Page 13: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Benefits of moving to a standards based LBS

architecture

Page 14: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Benefits and Value of using standard interfaces and protocols for LBS

• Integrate (fuse) many information resources on demand for better customer experience and decision support.

• Protect investment in legacy systems• More easily respond to changes in the LBS infrastructure• Change technology providers as well as better protect and

enhance relationships with existing partners.• Access and utilize content from many partners without

requiring a common format or model.– Can quickly wrap local or remote routing and geocoding

engines of any vendor (comment from a user)• More effectively plug into larger information infrastructures• Reduce coding development and maintenance costs

Page 15: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Cost reduction

• Initially the task of adding security to a Web service took 20,379 lines of code; adding reliable messaging took 5,988 lines of code and adding transactions took 25,507 lines of code, Rudder said. With an additional 4,442 for infrastructure plumbing, the total came to more than 56,000. Now security, reliable messaging, and transactions each require one line of code, he said.– Referring to the value of using the WS-Security and

WS-Discovery standards

Page 16: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

OGC Collaboration with other Standards Orgs

• OMA MLP 3.1 uses OGC standards and models for geometry and coordinate reference system expression.

• A new MOU defines how OGC and IEEE 1451 (sensors) collaborate and work towards harmonizing our standards work.

• Work with OASIS in several areas.• Work with ISO TC 211 in numerous joint work items.• The new Liberty Alliance geo-location Web service

interface references MLP 3.1 and therefore OGC standards.

• Collaborating with IETF Geopriv WG. The proposed enhancements to PIDF for location uses OGC GML encoding.

Page 17: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Webcam

EnvironmentalMonitor

StoredSensor

Data

Satellite-borneImaging device

HealthMonitor

AirborneImaging Device

Business IntelligenceAnalyst

StoredImagery

Data

StoredVector

Data

Internet and Intranet

Open interface ][ Integration with Sensor

Nets

Page 18: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Support Emergency Notification & Incident Reporting

Situation Notification ServiceSituation Notification Service• Common means for sharing Common means for sharing

location-based emergency location-based emergency notification messagesnotification messages

• Collaboration with OASISCollaboration with OASISIncident ReportsIncident Reports• Location-based incident reports Location-based incident reports

for cross-jurisdictional usefor cross-jurisdictional use• Collaborate with DOJCollaborate with DOJProjects with ORNLProjects with ORNL

Emergency Command Center

Page 19: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Summary – the value of good standards

• Enable innovation• Protect legacy and future investments• Enable integration and interoperability• Future proof current applications• Leverage value of legacy applications and infrastructure• Flexibility of choice and implementation • Enable co-opetition• Increase partner loyalty• Increase win-win in partner relationships• Enables technology convergence

Page 20: Philadelphia, May 2–4, 2005 locationintelligence

Thank you for your attention

Carl Reed, PhD

Open Geospatial Consortium

[email protected]

www.opengeospatial.org